IOS 7 security flaw

Major Security flaw in IOS 7
I your phone is locked with a passcode (even the complex one) and you swipe up to get to the control centre
Click on alarms
hold down the sleep on/off button until you get the slide to power off
Cancel this
Double click the Home button
hey presto you can get to the apps that were open
The phone is also unlocked
However this doesnt work if you had left the camera app open

I tried it in all different ways, it wouldn't open the phone. But when i do open the phone normally, it opens immediatly in the mutlitasking page. But I am sure this could be a security flaw that might work with others.

Similar Messages

Security Flaw: Since upgrading to iOS 8.3, I can by-pass passcode security by simply hitting RETURN on my bluetooth keyboard

I noticed when I typed my passcode incorrectly on my Logitech Fabric Skin Keyboard Folio, the iPad allowed me to log in. I checked again, but this time by just hitting RETURN key without entering any passcode, and again it allowed me to log in.
If I disconnect the keyboard, and use the soft keyboard on the iPad itself, it only allows the correct passcode.
Has anybody else seen this security flaw?
iPad Air
iOS 8.3

Please describe the problem in as much relevant detail as possible. The "etrecheck" fad hasn't made that step any less necessary. The better your description, the better the chance of a solution.
For example, if the computer is slow, which specific actions are slow? Is it slow all the time, or only sometimes? What other changes did you make, if any, just before it became slow? Have you seen any alerts or error messages? Have you done anything to try to fix it? Most importantly, do you have a current backup of all data? If the answer to the last question is "no," back up now. Ask if you need guidance. Do nothing else until you have a backup.

IOS 7.03 security flaw

There is still a security flaw in iOS 7.03 even after update on iPhone 5s. If you have control centre activated on the lock screen, press the home button while on standby, slide the control centre up and open, switch the torch on and off and the repeatedly press the home button. You'll be into your iPhone 5s without entering the passcode or using the finger print scanner.
Not good enough for a £500+ product. This needs rectifying immediately.

There is still a security flaw in iOS 7.03 even after update on iPhone 5s. If you have control centre activated on the lock screen, press the home button while on standby, slide the control centre up and open, switch the torch on and off and the repeatedly press the home button. You'll be into your iPhone 5s without entering the passcode or using the finger print scanner.
Not good enough for a £500+ product. This needs rectifying immediately.

IPhone location tracker - still a security flaw?

I hear a lot about a security flaw in the iPhone OS, allowing others to track the location of my phone without my consent and with no straightforward way to protect myself. On the internet, I see semi-legal app's offered, said to track any iPhone, "just enter the phone number".
First - is this still true? I have updated to the latest iOS5.
If not, what are the settings I need to be aware of?
If yes, has Apple announced a plan to plug that security flaw?
Short of jailbraking my phone and installing unauthorized software - what can I do about it?
/Lars

There is not, and never was, a security flaw in iOS that allows or allowed others tot track the location of the phone.
The "apps" you see are generally bogus. They are "joke" apps. They can NOT do what they appear to do. It's simply not possible.
... unless ...
If the phone is jailbroken, tracking apps can be installed. If your phone is not jailbroken, you have nothing to worry about. The only way anyone could track the location of your phone would by by accessing your iCloud account and using Find my iPhone. So long as you keep your password secure, this isn't an issue. Oh... and Find my Friends if you've agreed to share your location with someone.

ITunes no longer syncs to iPhone or iPad after iOS security update

I did the iOS security update on my iPhone 5 and my iPad Air. Now, iTunes will not sync with either device - neither one. In both cases, I get the error message "iPhone5 (or iPad) can not be synced. An unknown error occured (1140)."
I then did the iTunes update that just came out - still the same problem.
The Mac is a MacBook Pro 2.4 GHz Intel Core 7 running OSX 10.7.5. Everything worked fine before the iOS security update.
What is going on? What to do?

Finally, I had time to do a on-line support session with the Apple Care help people (excellent). We went through and verified a lot of things. Finally, he had me run the disk utility and run "repair disk permissions". That resolved things and it works now.
Also related is that the iOS 7.1 update installed a lot of stuff on the iPhone - including iMovie, Numbers, Pages, Keynotes - stuff that I will use on the iPad but not on the iPhone. The result of automatically installing all these things on the iPhone was to but it way over the limit on memory. I deselected thos apps (and a few others) plus some movies and am now below the memory limit on the iPhone.
Things are now working well with both the iPhone and iPad - both syncing correctly. So, with that, I will close out this case.

Branch office setup with L3 switch and router with IOS security

Hello,
I am in the process of putting together a small branch office network and I am in need of some design advise. The network will support about 10-15 workstations/phones, 3-4 printers, and 4-5 servers. In addition we will eventually have up to 25-30 remote users connecting to the servers via remote access VPN, and there will also be 2-3 site-to-site IPSec tunnels to reach other branches.
I have a 2911 (security bundle) router and 3560 IP Base L3 switch to work with. I have attached a basic diagram of my topology. My initial design plan for the network was to setup separate VLANs for workstation, phone, printer, and server traffic. The 3560 would then be setup with SVIs to perform routing between VLANs. The port between the router and switch would be setup as a routed port, and static routes would be applied on the switch and router as necessary. The thought behind this was that I'd be utilizing the switch backplane for VLAN routing instead instead of doing router-on-a-stick.
Since there is no firewall between the switch and router my plan was to setup IOS firewalling on the router. From what I am reading ZBF is my best option for this. What I was hoping for was a way to set custom policies for each VLAN, but it seems that zones are applied per interface. Since the interface between the router and switch is a routed interface, not a trunk/subinterface(s), it doesn't seem like there would be a way for me to use ZBF to control traffic on different VLANs. From what I am gathering I would have to group all of my internal network into one zone, or I would have to scrap L3 switching all together and do router-on-a-stick if I want to be able to set separate policies for each VLAN. Am I correct in my thinking here?
I guess what I am getting at is that I really don't want to do router-on-a-stick if I have a nice switch backplane to do all of the internal routing. At the same time I obviously need some kind of firewalling done on the router, and since different VLANs have different security requirements the firewalling needs to be fairly granular.
If I am indeed correct in the above thinking what would be the best solution for my scenario? That is, how can I setup this network so that I am utilizing the switch to do L3 routing while also leveraging the firewall capabilities of IOS security?
Any input would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Austin

Thanks for the input.
1. I agree, since I have only three to four printers, they need not be in a separate VLAN. I simply was compartmentalizing VLANs by function when I initially came up with the design.
2. Here's a little more info on the phone situation. The phones are VoIP. The IP PBX is on premise, but they are currently on a completely separate ISP/network. The goal in the future is to converge the data and voice networks and setup PBR/route maps to route voice traffic out the voice ISP and data traffic out the other ISP. This leads up to #3.
3. The reason a router was purchased over a firewall was that ASA's cannot handle routing and dual ISPs very well. PBR is not supported at all on an ASA, and dual ISPs can only be setup in an active/standby state. Also, an ASA Sec+ does not have near the VPN capabilities that the 2911 security does. The ASA Sec+ would support only 25 concurrent IPSec connections while the 2911 security is capable of doing an upwards of 200 IPSec connections.
Your point about moving the SVI's to a firewall to perform filtering between VLANs makes sense, however, wouldn't this be the same thing as creating subinterfaces on a router? In both cases you are moving routing from the switch backplane to the firewall/routing device, which is what I am trying to avoid.

Acrobat 9.2.0 Update Breaks Text Box Tool, Possibly Introduces a New Security Flaw.

Anyone have any ideas for this one?
Once we upgraded to version 9.2.0 (This is a major security release that fixes a Javascript security flaw) our text box tool no longer works the way we want it and crashes the program.
Try this:
1. Open any PDF document on a Windows XP SP3 computer with Adobe Acrobat 9.2.0.
2. Add the 'Text Box Tool' to the toolbar by right-clicking the toolbar and selecting 'MoreTools' then placing a checkbox next to the 'Text Box Tool'.
3. Click the 'Text Box Tool' on the toolbar and draw a new textbox anywhere on the PDF document.
4. Click out of the textbox to cancel typing mode, then single click back on the textbox that you just created.
5. Right-click the textbox that you created and select 'Properties..."
6. Under the 'Appearance' tab,
a. Select Style: No Border
b. Select Fill Color: No Color
c. Check the box 'Make Properties Default'
d. Click OK.
7. Click the Text Box Tool again, and draw another textbox (Since there is no border you will not see it but you will still be drawing a textbox).
8. Let go of the mouse when you are done drawing your textbox rectangle and the program will crash at this point.
Results:
1. "An internal error occurred." dialog box is displayed.
2. After clicking ok the following "Microsoft Visual C++ Runtime Library" dialog box is displayed:
"Runtime Error!
Program: C:\Program Files\Adobe\Acrobat 9.0\Acrobat\Acrobat.exe
R6025
- pure virtual function call
3. After clicking ok another dialog box is displayed:
Error signature
AppName: acrobat.exe AppVer: 9.2.0.124 ModName: acrobat.dll Offset: 000509dd
4. The same error has occurred on all five computers that we tested the new version on.
Expected results: A new textbox is created and you may start typing in text (This was the behavior in version 9.1.3).
Additional Information
At times, we need to add information to PDF files (i.e missing dates, etc). We have always used the Text Box Tool to do this with no border, and with no fill color as this is the EASIEST and FASTEST way to add information to PDF files in a precise manner. We want the fill color to be transparent so that we can fit text in between and exactly on lines easier, and so that there is not a solid background box behind the text. We want no border because a border around text that needs to go on a line looks stupid. Up until version 9.2 this procedure worked fine. Now, the program will crash. Perhaps this even adds another security vulnerability if the crash could be exploited. We want to maintain security by patching Adobe to address the JavaScript vulnerability that was addressed in version 9.2.0, however, we are not able to update our users as the new version breaks the fundamental purpose that we use Adobe Acrobat for. We are stuck with the vulnerable version 9.1.3 until this problem is addressed. Disabling JavaScript is not an option either, as we use a Java plug-in on a daily basis.
Any thoughts would be great, I have attached screenshots of the errors.

The question still is not answered.
The problem continues in Acrobat 8.1.7 for Windows, even after updating toAcrobat 8.2.0. ( I can't comment on whether recent updates to Acrobat 9 fix the problem in Acrobat 9.)
The internal error after text insertion problem occurs even with PDF documents created in Acrobat 8, i.e., not only old versions of PDF files. We have the text box insertion icon in the toolbar, and the properties set to "no color" for the box and "0" width for the text box lines, as other commentators have noted.
The problem did not exist when Acrobat 8 Pro was installed, it was introduced by one of the updaters.
The main reason we use Acrobat, rather than much cheaper PDF-creation software, is to annotate PDF files (including inputting data into spaces in standard forms).
So justify the high price of Acrobat and fix the problem please, Adobe !

Security flaw-To use CSOM/Javascript code for Custom Office365(Sharepoint Online) application

Hi,
I've developed custom application in Office365(Sharepoint Online) using CSOM/Javascript. Security team from client side has been reported one major issue to the our application that any end user can comment our CSOM/Javascript code and bypass the validation
or can update / insert into sharepoint list item using developer tool/ Console in Google Chrome(F12 Key).
Also end user can write his own separate code in console of Google Chrome (Developer Tool / F12) and can update / insert into Sharepoint List.
Note:- End user has Add, Edit, View permission on all Sharepoint List.
This is one major security flaw of the Sharepoint/Office365 to use CSOM /Javascript for writing code, to overcome this issue could you please provide me some solution.
Your help would be greatly appreciated!!!
Looking for reply.
Thanks,
Mahesh Sherkar
Web: http://Mahesh-Sherkar.com
Email: [email protected]

Hello Paras,
Did you get any solution for this? I think your website was implemented this form. Can you please tell me the way how I can achieve it? I am also facing same problem. Please reply me as early as possible.
Thanks,
Mihir

Serious security flaw found in IE

*Important Information*
A serious security flaw is found in Internet Explorer today and everybody is been advised by 'MICROSOFT' not to use Internet Explorer for any confidential banking transactions until the new patch is released.
The new patch would be released at the earliest and Microsoft advices everybody to use the browser from their rivals until the patch is released.
Click on the below link to read:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7784908.stm

I advise everybody to use the browser from their rivals, even after the the patch is released!
I couldn´t agree more
Maybe the browser was patched now so the data is not stolen by "someone" but to Microsoft instead when surfing MSDN
</cynism>
Markus

Security Flaw on iPhone???

Critical iPhone security flaw found
Fortify Software, a security firm, has uncovered a critical security flaw in the Apple iPhone which could lead to phishing attacks.
Because the iPhone only displays the first few characters of a URL in its Safari web browser, phishers could easily hide a fraudulent URL at the end of a link without the user even knowing it.
Even worse, the iPhone connects the browser and the phone in such a way that it may be possible to embed scam telephone numbers into a site to make the phone automatically dial the scam number.
Let’s hope Apple is working on a fix for this one because that is some scary stuff. Now, if you input addresses yourself and use bookmarks, the chances of being affected by this are relatively minimal. That said, watch out for strange emails and Google results — you can’t always trust that either.
Anybody read this? Any comments or thoughts??? Valid?

It's hardly a new flaw since disguising URLs in links has been common practice for some time. However, while the browser does indeed only show a limited number of characters from the URL being opened (more if in landscape mode than portrait) to get to the URL at all the user would either have to enter it manually, or encounter it in an email or web page where the full URL should readily be discovered.
It seems probable to me that over time, security holes will be found as in all accessible and discoverable devices on the internet. Based on experience with Apple and MacOS, I would have confidence that genuine weaknesses found in the iPhone will benefit from security fixes as expeditiously as possible.

Security flaw in bt home hub 4 & bt home hub 5

there is a security flaw in the lastest two home hubs I recommend you avoid using these

That's a sweeping statement. Do you want tell us what it is?
EDIT: I see your other post
https://community.bt.com/t5/Other-BB-Queries/WPS-no-longer-gets-disabled-by-BT/td-p/776140/page/2
about the "security flaw" and I see you have also been answered.

BusinessObjects security flaw left users vulnerable to attack

Audit found this web article "BusinessObjects security flaw left users vulnerable to attack" http://searchsap.techtarget.com/news/2240025968/BusinessObjects-security-flaw-left-users-vulnerable-to-attack?asrc=EM_NLN_13056439&track=NL-137&ad=804092
and they were wondering if our installation of BusinessObjects was also vulnerable. I was not able to answer for sure, so I asked our BASIS team. They said that it is not clear from the article what components are actually affected or in what patch level this is corrected.
Does anyone know specifically where the security flaw is?
Thanks,
~Matt Strehlow

Hi Denis
thanks for the reply.
Are you absolutely sure that the passage should not be in the file any more?
I've checked now 3 different installations and I've even checked the axis2.xml in the war files I found (dated 04/22/2010) and they all do contain these two lines:
<parameter name="userName">admin</parameter>
<parameter name="password">axis2</parameter>
The installation were BOXI 3.1 SP3, meaning we used the "merged" installation files that include the SP3. One of the installations I checked has even Fix Pack 3.4 installed.
The only axis2.xml file I found that did not contain this passage was from a BODI installation...
am I missing something here?
thanks for any help!
MU

FLASH SECURITY FLAW / FLASH 10.1 BETA

Re: Regarding the Flash security flaw, on the advice of an expert I installed ver 10.1 beta but now I can't stream audio. The players all say i need flash to play. But since I installed 10.1, don't I already HAVE Flash?

Hi, Yes you do have the Flash Player, however the 10.1 is a prerelease and is still a "work in progress" This will be the next version of Flash Player when the final release comes out which I don't know yet when that will be.
You can read about it here and if you want to Uninstall 10.1 and Install the shipped version, which is 10.0.45.2, page down until you see Uninstallers.
http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html
This is a thread that gives a little more info:
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/653155?tstart=0
Thanks,
eidnolb

Fatal Security Flaw in WRT54GS?

Sorry I don't have the hardware revision handy.
Firmware is 1.52.0. Model is WRT54GS.
I'm configured with WPA2-PSK/AES. Broadcasting my SSID. No MAC access filtering.
HTTPS access only to the config pages. Custom (not default) password. Remote management disabled.
Summary:
The router simply "forgot" its assigned SSID and reverted to broadcasting as "linksys".
It also ceased encrypting its broadcast.
I was able to log in and change it back. It retained many of the OTHER settings I had previously configured.
What causes this? Is it a known issue? Is there a fix?
Details:
Two days ago, I noticed my client (laptop) could no longer see the usual SSID that I connect to on my home network.
However, there was a new SSID in the area, named "linksys", broadcasting UNSECURED.
Coincidentally, this new "linksys" access point had the exact same signal strength that my usual access point typically had.
So, I connected to it, you know, just to see.
I was only able to access the config pages at my custom IP address (not at x.y.0.1), prefixed with the "https://" scheme identifier.
And it didn't prompt for a password. Hopefully because it recognized the cookie my browser still carried from the last time I logged in to it. But maybe because it had temporarily dropped ALL of its security measures...
It was definitely my router. Just, stripped of its usual encryption/authentication and its usual SSID.
So, I switched the SSID back to what it usually is.
And I turned the WPA2-PSK/AES encryption back on.
The router "remembered" my WPA2 passphrase, which it helpfully displayed to me as plaintext when I pulled down the "security mode" dropdown menu and selected "WPA2 Personal".
After re-configuring, it works as well as ever.
Is this a known security flaw in the WRT45GS? Because....it seems like a fatal one, as far as network security is concerned.
Is it limited to one firmware release? Is there a firmware upgrade to fix it?
(Again, I regret not having my hardware revision handy.)
Thanks.

Thanks for the reply.
Yeah, the initial configuration was done wired.
Subsequent reconfigurations were done wirelessly, on the encrypted wireless, connected via https.
Remote management was NEVER enabled (and remained disabled, even after the router's little spell of amnesia).
This particular router has been up and (mostly) stable for something like three years. For the past year, WPA2-PSK encryption ahs been enabled. The present WPA2-PSK passphrase is NOT the same as the old WEP key.
I'll assume (just for a moment) that nobody hacked the router. The only reason my router would be intresting for anyone to hack is simply because it's there. And there are half a dozen other WPA2-PSK networks and a handfull of WEP networks within shouting distance. And, if it was hacked from the outside, that would also indicate a "fatal security flaw" in the WRT54GS...
So, let's assume it just glitched out and forgot its own name for 12hrs.
Tell me more about what happens to NVRAM as it ages. Does it become less N(on) and more V(olatile) with time?
I know the router got hit by a storm-related power surge about 9 months ago. It was reset at that time, exhibited some strange behavior (not wanting to display the config web pages) and then it "settled down" after a day or two.
While it's performed fine since then, it may have sustained some subtle sort of damage at that time.
But no parameters were lost or altered in the NVRAM. And there was no obvious surge-type event to precipitate it now.
What's the life expectancy of these things anyway? Is this an early warning sign that I should upgrade to new hardware?

Security flaw in Femtocells

You should all read this.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/07/15/us-verizon-hacking-idUSBRE96E06X20130715

That's a sweeping statement. Do you want tell us what it is?
EDIT: I see your other post
https://community.bt.com/t5/Other-BB-Queries/WPS-no-longer-gets-disabled-by-BT/td-p/776140/page/2
about the "security flaw" and I see you have also been answered.

IOS 7 security flaw

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for