IOS blocking incoming SMS containing specific URL's

Does anyone know if a SMS can get blocked if it contains a specific URL? We sent a link to customers in an SMS so they can track an order. Now all iPhones have started to block these messages that contain our URL to track it. other devices receive the SMS with the URL OK, so it looks like Apple is blocking it.
They are only blocking our domain used for tracking, and not our other domains e.g company homepage.
Is there anywhere we can request it to be unblocked?
We tested on 6 different iPhones:
IOS 7.xx
IOS 8.02
IOS 8.13

Started carrer with afaria 7. I used to wonder as to why this feature not their in afaria while it works superb in case of Airwatch. You provided a workaround... Nice to see this.
Nice work Abdelaziz!!!
Hope this comes as a default  feature of afaria

Similar Messages

  • ICloud mail blocking emails containing certain URLs

    I've discovered that iCloud email is blocking both incoming and outgoing emails containing certain URLs in the body of the email.
    There is no indication to the sender that the email has been blocked.
    In my case, I was organising an evening out at a pub in West London called The Oak.
    The pub website is www.theoakw12.com and I put this in the body of the email, but nobody received the email.
    If I remove the "." so it is no longer a full URL, the email is received.
    It looks like Apple's email filtering is over-zealous... but I've been going round and round Apple's support pages but can't find anywhere to report this sort of issue except for these forums.

    Just to add further info: I check the Cloud Mail from a PC at work.

  • I have been putting in a URL and yahoo snags it parses it to several words then gives me a search page... I use Google for search andf I want to go to the specific URL I entered... How do I block Yahoo from doing this crap?

    I use google for my search engine. I do not have any reference to Yahoo in my plugins or extensions on Firefox. Every time I enter a specific URL in the Firefox box, Yahoo comes up, has the full URL I entered to go directly to. It has the URL in the Yahoo search entry field and it parses the name to several words that make up the entire URL. Asks me if I only want the name I entered and lists every site that contains the words it parses... Yahoo is really screw up if it hijacks the browser. How do I prevent them from doing this...

    Hi,
    The Reset Firefox feature can fix many issues by restoring Firefox to its factory default state while saving your essential information.
    Note: ''This will cause you to lose any Extensions, Open websites, and some Preferences.''
    To Reset Firefox do the following:
    #Go to Firefox > Help > Troubleshooting Information.
    #Click the "Reset Firefox" button.
    #Firefox will close and reset. After Firefox is done, it will show a window with the information that is imported. Click Finish.
    #Firefox will open with all factory defaults applied.
    Further information can be found in the [[Reset Firefox – easily fix most problems]] article.
    Did this fix your problems? Please report back to us!

  • While listening to a podcast on my iPhone I can e-mail the podcast ID. The email contains the url for the specific podcast. So you would assume that you could put that url into iTunes and it would take you to the podcast. This used to work but no longer.

    While listening to a podcast on my iPhone I can e-mail the podcast ID to share it with someone else. The email contains the url for the specific podcast. So you would assume that you could put that url into iTunes and it would take you to the podcast. This used to work but no longer. Months ago when I would e-mail myself the url all I had to do was click on the link in the e-mail and it took me right to the specific podcast in iTunes. Now it only opens iTunes and I can't figure out how to find the specific one. What good is the e-mail tab on the iPhone if it doesn't connect you to the podcast you sent?

    Same here. I just posted a question too.

  • Feature requests:  block outgoing SMS, unlink cell

    I'd love to know how to either submit this as a feature request to Apple, find out how to "fix" it myself, now, or discover how to get Apple to pay my unwanted text messaging costs...
    I see, now that I've upgraded to ios 6, that my cell phone's number (I'm on an iPhone 4s) is tied to iMessage.
    It would seem, then, that (because I cannot really count on Verizon's SMS block to work, all the time), this may cause me to start getting spam messages from people who are able to discover my phone # ?
    Is there any way to NOT link my cell phone number to my iMessaging?  It's NOT listed in my Apple ID profile, but it is entered and checked, on my phone, in iMessage settings. 
    Those who I want to iMessage me know my apple ID.  Those are the only messages I want to receive.
    In addition, Apple, please come up with a way for those of us who do not text (yes, we exist) and who have attempted to get our providers to block ALL (incoming AND outgoing) texts from our phones, to at least block outgoing SMS via your software.
    If anyone has any workarounds for me, on this, I'd love to hear them.
    Thanks,
    Em

    You cannot stop iMessage from associating your number with your account.  But, you do not have to use that number as your displayed ID on sent messages.  Just setup an alternate email address under callerID and use that (I use my @me.com address as my Caller ID, since I really never use it for anything else anyway).
    Note too, that any message sent to your phone number would go through your carriers SMS system anyway, unless specifically sent from another iOS devices.  Most spam emails do not originalte from an iOS device, so iMessage really has little to do with actual spam texts (which are generally sent from computer servers using your [email protected] address anyway).  Your carriers blocks should continue to catch those.
    iMessages only work from an iOS device to another iOS device, which does not absolutely mean that there will never be spam iMessage texts, but I'd think they would be few and far between.

  • IPhone 5 outgoing and incoming SMS works but incoming calls do not work. The dialler gets message this number is not in available in network.

    New I phone outgoing calls as well incoming SMS works but can not receive incoming calls. Caller gets the number does not exist in network.

         Like Superman, here I am to save the day! I can help you with your service in your home area dizzymslizzie. Let's start with what zip code are you in? Can I assume that there isn't any physical or liquid damage on the iPhone 5? Recently, there has been an update to the iPhone to iOS 7. If you have done this update then please provide the exact carrier version that's installed. Keep in mind that there is a difference in device performance between iOS 7 and the iOS 7 beta version. As you share this info, I will check the area to re-affirm that the issue is or is not network related.
    Thank you...
    ArnettH_VZW
    Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

  • I want to allow only specific url using class-map

    i have two  dir on server like abc and  xyz  on the web server , but i have blocked the url using class-map like *xyz*
    is there any way to allow specific url  like in dir /abc/login.html and block all the files from /abc dir

    Thanks.  Actually, I posted my query because I haven't been able to make Parental Controls in OS X do what I want. I've been trying that tool for a while.  It seems that there are sort of three options:
    1. Allow everything with no exceptions
    2. Block sites that fail an automated filter for "adult" content, and then add back allowable sites.
    3. Block everything, and then add a white list of allowed sites
    In my case, option 2 doesn't work, because frankly, I don't care if my kids choose to look at content that somebody has evaluated as "adult."  Generally, the web log says that they don't, and if that does become an issue, then I will deal with it when it arises.  
    What I want to be able to do is the direct opposite of option 3 listed above:  Allow everything except an admin-specified black list defined per user, and be able to modify that list from time to time when I have a specific issue with a specific user. 
    I just want to be able - from time to time, like when I know they are behind on school work - to be able block a short list of "innocuous" persistent time-sucking sites as Youtube, Facebook, Twitter etc., even though there is not necessarily any objection content per se on the sites I want to block for that specific user (the "user-specific, admin-defined blacklist").   It is the lost (mis-allocated) time, not the risk of loose morals that concerns me.
    Network-level solutions exist, but these do not allow me to discriminate among user accounts as far as I can tell.  If anybody knows of a good solution that works in OS X across various platforms - freeware or commercial - I will appreciate a lead.   Or, if there is a hack that will allow me to accomplish this in Parental Controls, I would appreciate a pointer in that direction, as well.

  • Access to incoming sms (non-port) and phone functionality

    I've been reading a lot about the inability for J2ME apps to access incoming SMS (if they aren't directed to a specific port #) and other phone functionality (like contacts data database, call status, etc.).
    Has that changed at all or is that still an issue with J2ME?
    Thanks.

    Unfortunately, it's not as simple as you think.  When caller-ID was developed, the Bell System was one big happy system. The telephone switches were all under the control of responsible companies.  The caller-ID protocol and system was setup assuming trusted entities through the link.
    Since then, the telephone system has greatly diversified and merged with data communications.  Now, we have VoIP services that interconnect with telephone services.  There is no provision in the caller-ID system to verify the source of the data.  It is trivial for someone to use VoIP to feed bogus caller-ID data into the existing system.
    This can be fixed with regulation by the FCC and money spent by the telephone companies, however in this economic and political climate it is unlikely.
    Annoying realities of life in the modern era.
    If a forum member gives an answer you like, give them the Kudos they deserve. If a member gives you the answer to your question, mark the answer as Accepted Solution so others can see the solution to the problem.

  • I want to Prevent a specific URL through My Computer

    I want to Prevent a specific URL through My Computer.No one can access any specific URL which i Block.
    e.g http://www.yahoo.com
    i want to block this specific site.Plz help me to block this site.

    Uncheck the song. Use the option to sync only checked songs and videos. Sync.
    tt2

  • Block incoming anonymous calls

    Hi,
    I'm trying to block incoming blocked/unknown/anonymous callers over a sip trunk? I've creaed a translation rule and applied it:
    voice translation-rule 5000
    rule 1 reject /^$/
    voice translation-profile CallBlock5000
    translate calling 5000
    dial-peer voice xxxx voip
    call-block translation-profile incoming CallBlock5000
    call-block disconnect-cause incoming invalid-number
    To try it out, I'm dialing (from a normal/off network cell and landline) *67 and then the number. This does not work; only if I match the exact number I'm calling from, then it does get blocked.
    When I show sip calls during the *67 call I see the calling number is blank.
       Calling Number         :
    When I show sip calls during the regular call, I see the proper Calling Number.
    As I understand it, with Call Manager and phones running SCCP, I cannot enable/use anonymous call blocking; so I do have to enforce the call blocking policy at this gateway device (UC520).
    I'm very new to Cisco voice, so sorry I'f I'm missing something obvious. Thanks in advance!

    Thanks, I tried the rule--still private gets through.
    *Feb 14 21:52:37.457: //394/0B18CF2B8382/SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
    Sent:
    SIP/2.0 100 Trying
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 207.2.123.180:5060;branch=z9hG4bK71b5401f596084541bb0894ae16bbbc8
    From: ;tag=3538245046-512161
    To: [email protected](CUBE external IP)>
    Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:52:37 GMT
    Call-ID: [email protected]
    CSeq: 1 INVITE
    Allow-Events: telephone-event
    Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x
    Content-Length: 0
    *Feb 14 21:52:37.457: //395/0B18CF2B8382/SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
    Sent:
    INVITE sip:[email protected](UCMBE IP):5060 SIP/2.0
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP yy.yy.yy.yy(UC500/CUBE IP)>;:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2B4F4E
    Remote-Party-ID: [email protected](UC500/CUBE IP)>;party=calling;screen=no;privacy=full
    From: "anonymous" ;tag=4C78DEC-1E4B
    To: [email protected]>
    Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:52:37 GMT
    Call-ID: [email protected]
    Supported: 100rel,timer,resource-priority,replaces,sdp-anat
    Min-SE: 1800
    Cisco-Guid: 0186175275-1452085729-2206375728-3952970709
    User-Agent: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x
    Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, REGISTER
    CSeq: 101 INVITE
    Timestamp: 1329256357
    Contact:
    Expires: 180
    Allow-Events: telephone-event
    Max-Forwards: 69
    Session-Expires: 3600;refresher=uac
    Content-Type: application/sdp
    Content-Disposition: session;handling=required
    Content-Length: 246
    v=0
    o=CiscoSystemsSIP-GW-UserAgent 2063 472 IN IP4 yy.yy.yy.yy(UC500/CUBE IP)
    s=SIP Call
    c=IN IP4 yy.yy.yy.yy(UC500/CUBE IP)
    t=0 0
    m=audio 19566 RTP/AVP 0 101
    c=IN IP4 192.168.20.5
    a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
    a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
    a=fmtp:101 0-15
    a=ptime:20
    *Feb 14 21:52:37.465: //395/0B18CF2B8382/SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
    Received:
    SIP/2.0 100 Trying
    Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:50:47 GMT
    From: "anonymous" ;tag=4C78DEC-1E4B
    Allow-Events: presence
    Content-Length: 0
    To: [email protected](UCMBE IP)>
    Call-ID: [email protected]
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP yy.yy.yy.yy(UC500/CUBE IP):5060;branch=z9hG4bK2B4F4E
    CSeq: 101 INVITE
    *Feb 14 21:52:37.469: //395/0B18CF2B8382/SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
    Received:
    SIP/2.0 180 Ringing
    Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:50:47 GMT
    Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, INFO, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY
    From: "anonymous" ;tag=4C78DEC-1E4B

  • How I can lock  undesired incoming SMS on iPhone 5 ?

    How I can lock  undesired incoming SMS on iPhone 5?

    Unfortunately, they're evading their responsibility and blowing smoke. No iPhone (and darn few phones per se) has ever offered and supported call blocking. That is inevitably the domain of who's forwarding the call: the carrier. The near-monopoly status that some have in some places does NOT help in prodding them to fulfull their duties.
    So, in summary, it would appear you are
    <Edited By Host>

  • Block incoming messages without blocking users?

    Is there a way to block incoming messages on iChat (so that no conversation bubbles pop up) but not block users or appear invisible? I'd to have my away message visible to everyone, but not have messages pop up.

    Hi,
    You can turn On Auto Decline.
    Go to iChat > Preferences > Alerts
    Select Text Invitation in the top drop down
    Tick the AppleScript Box
    Select Auto Decline form the AppleScript drop down.
    Chax lets you reply with specific auto Away messages.
    In iChat you can Auto Reply with the Away message (Set in the General Section)
    But these will not be sent if the first setting is chosen as the invite will be declined.
    9:49 PM Tuesday; May 4, 2010
    Please, if posting Logs, do not post any Log info after the line "Binary Images for iChat"

  • Blocking Incoming Texts By Sender?

    I'm asking this for a friend who is receiving incoming SPAM texts. The only way I know to block incoming texts is to have your carrier disable texting totally. I couldn't find anything in the iOS 6.1 User Guide about blocking incoming texts.
    So, does anyone know if it is possible to do this or if there is an app that can do this?

    No, you misread what I posted. The first part of the sentence referred to all cariers employing a process whereby you can report spam messages. For AT&T that would be here, and there is no charge:
    http://www.att.com/esupport/article.jsp?sid=KB115812&cv=820&title=Block%20spam%2 0text%20messages%20on%20your%20wireless%20phone#fbid=ozLqTsdlTGL
    Since spammers frequently change the spoofed numbers they send with just blocking a single number will not generally work. If you want to block a number of that psycho ex-girlfriend AT&T has a service that lets you do so for a fee ($4.95 per month). I believe Verizon lets you do up to 10 numbers for free. This works for the psycho ex but not well for spammers.
    There is no fee to turn off all texting and I never said there was.

  • For iphone users with att, can you block incoming texts all together? After paying $20 for data i dont want to pay as i go/pay more for texts

    For iphone users with att, can you block incoming texts all together? After paying $20 for data i dont want to pay as i go/pay more for texts

    SMS is exchanged over the same network as calls - no data involved.
    MMS requires data.
    iMessage requires the same as email - internet access via an available wi-fi network or via your carrier's cellular data network.
    You can disable SMS/MMS altogther with your account by requesting this with AT&T. You can turn iMessage off unless your iPhone is connected to an available wi-fi network.

  • Local router blocking incoming remote assistance request

     I have a user who recently moved. they received new equipment from their ISP. I use to be able to make remote assistance connections to their computer using a popular system center configuration manager remote tool. Now i can't get past the handshake when i try to connect. If he has split tunneling enabled would the new router block incoming traffic? I know by default most of the router's firewall will block all incoming traffic (if enabled). does this apply to VPN traffic?

    Hi, if the VPN terminates on an IOS router, then the split tunneling does not "block" anything. It simply decides which traffic is sent through the tunnel and which traffic is sent in clear text (as in Internet traffic). 
    If the router has ACLs on the outside interface, that could be blocking the traffic (even VPN traffic). 
    Make sure the desired traffic is part of the split tunneling rule and that if there's an ACL, it allows the traffic to pass.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How can I set default copies for specific report?

    I'm trying to set a default of one copy on a specific concurrent request. In this particular case, the NACHA request that produces the NACHA magnetic file. I have a dummy custom printer driver, style, etc. setup and attached to the NACHA concurrent p

  • Unable to open the document when combining files.

    We have a user that gets an error when combining files. It says Unable to open the document: <Filename and path> Please check to see if you have read permission for the above file. Retry and cancel buttons. We get this error on every subsequent file,

  • Contacts Display and Sort by Company Name

    I have over 1000 contacts in Outlook which synced wonderfully with my new iPhone. Alas, I need to lookup and sort by Company Name. This is a VERY standard method for contacts. The options presented by iphone are first and last name, sigh and tech sup

  • SOAP sender adapter and several interfaces

    I have several interfaces and want to connect them via SOAP sender adapter. How can I use 1 communication channel for this interfaces? or do i need to create communicaton channel for each interface?

  • Advice on Dreamweaver CS5.5

    I have spent 35 minutes attempting to purchase Dreamweaver CS5.5 from the Adobe site. The main page would not allow a change of country from USA and when I found an Australian download page Dreamweaver CS5.5 was not listed. I used the 'Send an email"