IOS support for MPLS QoS as stated in RFC 3270 L-LSP
Hi,
does anybody know something about the degree of implementation of RFC 3270 (Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Support of Differentiated Services), particularly on the classification based on Labels (L-LSP)?
From what is detailed on the CCO it seems that only Exp-bits based LSP are supported (configuring all links along the path for the proper data plane behaviour based on the Exp-bits values): E-LSP
Thanx in advance
Francesco
I guess, in PPP and LAN environments, E-LSP is the preferred method and in the ATM only L-LSP is possible. Maybe cisco chose to implement only the E-LSP for the LAN and PPP environments, i am not sure though.
Anyone knows this for sure?
Check out http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/732/Tech/mpls/docs/mpls_qos_jayk.ppt for more details on MPLS-QoS
Similar Messages
-
IOS for 2801 having support for MPLS
Assalam o Alaikum,
Is there any IOS for 2801 router which has the support for MPLS?Alaikum Al Salam,
Please use Cisco Feature Navigator to find information about Cisco IOS software images and the supported features for your platform(s) :
http://tools.cisco.com/ITDIT/CFN/jsp/index.jsp
Search by feature and choose MPLS, and then choose Cisco 2801 as the platform, you'll get a list of the IOSs that support MPLS on your platform, and please always check the required DRAM and Flash.
BR,
Mohammed Mahmoud. -
Getting this error message as of this morning: The version of iOS on “iPad” does not match any of the versions of iOS supported for development with this installation of the iOS SDK. Please restore the device to a version of the OS listed below, or update to the latest version of the iOS SDK. I've downloaded the latest SDK and gone through the usual turn off and turn on again for iPad and computer, removed and reinstalled the iPad from Organizer and have no idea how to make apps build now. I was prompted to update the iphone too but there's no way I'm updating it if this issue can't be resolved.
Okay these are the steps I took to solve the problem - they may not be the right ones for you but they've solved the problem and saved time hunting for some other solution. Firstly I changed my MAC system to Lion with the £20 download, then I deleted the old Xcode and installed the new version that is app based and doesn't support Snow Leopard, then all was well. I can now update my xcode via the app which is quicker and more logical and can update my iPhone rather than chug along avoiding updates as I need to update my existing apps on the app store and upload a new one.
-
IOS support for Flash Builder 4.5.1
I am getting the following message when I try to export a releae build to iOS using Flash Builder 4.5.1:
This platform is not currently supported for Flex Mobile projects
I have tried running the update again and gives me the update was successful message, but I still don't have iOS support.
I did update using the Eclipse updater and was unable to open Flash Builder, but since resolved that issue. I wonder if I need to reinstall Flash Builder and reapply the update or if there is an easier fix.I just created a project with Adobe Launchpad (http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/airlaunchpad/), and it looked like I setup all the options for iOS, but when I go to run configurations and try and deploy to an iOS device I'm getting the same problem: "This platform is not currently supported for Flex Mobile projects"
Anyone know why? -
IOS need for MPLS for 3600 ruter
Hi all
I want to build a mpls lab using 3640 router can any one tell me which ios support mplsHi,
use the latest Telco or Advanced Enterprise feature set. MPLS L3VPN (P and PE) and MPLS TE is supported. Some features might be missing compared to high end routers but the 3640 will still allow you to investigate MPLS in great detail.
If you are interested in configuration of f.e. VLANoMPLS I would also recommend to have a look at the c7200 router simulator allowing you to boot a REAL IOS with all the features of a 7200.
http://www.ipflow.utc.fr/index.php/Cisco_7200_Simulator
Hope this helps! Please use the rating system.
Regards, Martin -
881 IOS support for IPSEC and OSPF
Is there an IOS image for the 881 that contains IPSEC feature set AND support for OSPF? I recently purchased an 881 and it came default with this system image "c880data-universalk9-mz.152-4.M4.bin", however this image does not support OSPF. I need an IOS image that supports both OSPF and IPSEC feature sets. Please advise.
hi,
according to cisco's FN, you might need a c880data-universalk9-mz.153-2.T1.bin. -
HT4623 how do u make IOS supported for your ipod iphone etc.
How to make ios 7.1 supported for your ipod touch 5th generation
I don't know if you have the same trouble as me, but after upgrading my Ipod touch with the 7.1 ios it stop working correctly.
-
Hi! i'm trying to do a lab at my university implementing MPLS. I have routers cisco 2610 series. This is my configuration:
Cisco2600-2(config-if)# ip route-cache cef
Cisco2600-2(config-if)# mpls label protocol ldp
Cisco2600-2(config-if)#mpls ip
My problem is that i can't use te "set mpls experimental topmost " command at the policy-map. My options are:
Cisco2600-2(config-pmap-c)#?
QoS policy-map class configuration commands:
bandwidth Bandwidth
compression Activate Compression
drop Drop all packets
exit Exit from QoS class action configuration mode
no Negate or set default values of a command
police Police
priority Strict Scheduling Priority for this Class
queue-limit Queue Max Threshold for Tail Drop
random-detect Enable Random Early Detection as drop policy
service-policy Configure QoS Service Policy
shape Traffic Shaping
My version of the IOS is:
IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-TELCO-M), Version 12.3(15b), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
wich version do i need to run this command and configurations?? Any information will help. Thank you very much. Best regards!!It is my understanding that you don't have that capability in those images (or platform). I didn't find the feature in the feature set of the 2600 platform. The feature you are looking for is: "MPLS Quality of Service (QoS) Enhancements"
From the feature set definition:
- MPLS quality of service enhancements allow service providers to classify packets according to their type, input interface, and other factors by setting (marking) each packet within the MPLS experimental field without changing the IP precedence/DSCP field. For example, service providers can classify packets with or without considering the rate of the packets that PE1 receives. If the rate is a consideration, the service provider marks in-rate packets differently from out-of-rate packets.
HTH,
-W -
Cisco 2500 & 2600 support for MPLS ???
Can Cisco Router 2500 & 2600 Series provide provide MPLS switching?
2600 is fine for lab use....
milt-vpn-1>sh ver
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-J1S3-M), Version 12.3(1), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3)
Copyright (c) 1986-2003 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Thu 15-May-03 13:12 by dchih
Image text-base: 0x80008098, data-base: 0x819BC684
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
milt-vpn-1 uptime is 1 week, 6 days, 21 hours, 12 minutes
System returned to ROM by reload
System image file is "flash:c2600-j1s3-mz.123-1.bin"
cisco 2611 (MPC860) processor (revision 0x202) with 59392K/6144K bytes of memory
Processor board ID JAB0321051M (1822838117)
M860 processor: part number 0, mask 49
Bridging software.
X.25 software, Version 3.0.0.
TN3270 Emulation software.
2 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s)
1 Serial network interface(s)
2 Serial(sync/async) network interface(s)
32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
16384K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write)
Configuration register is 0x2102 -
What is the minimum software version for Cisco 2620XM to execute mpls?
I am running Version 12.2(24)but enable to run mpls command.
1)Router(config)#tag-switching advertise-tags
2)Router(config)# interface e0/1
Router(config-if)# tag-switching ip
Pls help!!It looks like MPLS really does disappear in 12.4 code for the 2651XM (see below). It's too bad because I could use the features and would rather not have to replace a bunch of routers.
PE#show ver
System returned to ROM by reload
System image file is "flash:c2600-spservicesk9-mz.123-18.bin"
PE#
PE#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
PE(config)#int fa0/0
PE(config-if)#mpls ip
PE(config-if)#tag-switching ip
PE(config-if)#end
PE#
PE#show version
System returned to ROM by reload
System image file is "flash:c2600-spservicesk9-mz.124-7a.bin"
PE#
PE#config t
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
PE(config)#int fa0/0
PE(config-if)#mpls ip
^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
PE(config-if)#tag-switching ip
^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
PE(config-if)#end
PE# -
Does the 7300 currently support MPLS TE, either in the PXF path or software processed?
The 7300 does support MPLS TE. You can choose the version that supports if you have access to the Feature navigator tool which requires a CCO account.
-
How many physical links does ios support for the same ip route entry?
6500/7600?12000?crs-1?
can etherchannel increase load balancing ways?check out the following link on EtherChannel Load Balancing :
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk213/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094714.shtml
hope it helps. -
Hi all,
need help. we r ISP and we need to implement L2-MPLS, we hv 7513 in our network as a PE and need to know which IOS will support L2-MPLS,QoS,MPLS OSPF,MPLS RIP.
Thanks & Regards,
CiscobuddyThe following images for 7500 which is of 12.0(26)S release might help you in implementing your requirement "rsp-pv-mz.12.0-26.S1" or "rsp-pv-mz.12.0-26.S". This image requires 128MB of DRAM and 16MB of flash .
-
Can Cisco 7200VXR support for VPLS?
Hi all,
I check Cisco Nagivator Feature to find which IOS support for VPLS on Cisco Router 7200VXR and found that IOS image "c7200-spservicesk9-mz.122-33.SRD.bin" can do it as below;
- VPLS Autodiscovery, BGP-based
- VPLS Multiple VCs per Spoke
When I try to configure Virtual Forwarding Instance, it's not allow me to configure the above features (VPLS Autodiscovery: BGP Based, Manual Configuration of VPLS) and only support point-to-point configuration mode you can see it as below
R1#show version
Cisco IOS Software, 7200 Software (C7200-SPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(33)SRD, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Copyright (c) 1986-2008 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Thu 23-Oct-08 12:58 by prod_rel_team
R1(config)#l2 vfi ?
WORD VFI name
R1(config)#l2 vfi VPLS_A ?
point-to-point Point-to-point configuration mode
R1(config)#l2 vfi VPLS_A point-to-point ?
<cr>
R1(config)#router bgp 100
R1(config-router)#bgp router-id 150.1.1.1
R1(config-router)#neighbor 150.1.12.2 remote-as 100
R1(config-router)#neighbor 150.1.12.2 update-source lo0
R1(config-router)#address-family ?
ipv4 Address family
ipv6 Address family
l2vpn Address family
nsap Address family
vpnv4 Address family
vpnv6 Address family
R1(config-router)#address-family l2vpn ?
vpls Address Family modifier
<cr>
R1(config-router)#address-family l2vpn vpls ?
<cr>
R1(config-router)#address-family l2vpn vpls
% BGP: Error initializing topology
R1(config-router)#
I can use "l2 vfi VPLS_A point-to-point" for Layer 2 VPN Pseudo-Wire Switching but not for VPLS multipoint configuration mode. Can Cisco 7200VXR support VPLS on this IOS image? If it can't, which IOS image can do it on this platform.VPLS is not supported on 7200, you can configure point to point here but not point to multipoint, you will have to move to 7600 for that.
-
MPLS QoS - SUP720BXL GE Port not supporting Strict Priority & Priority %
Hi Sir,
My customer have few C7609s with SUP720 3BXL and running IOS image s72033-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF6.bin within the MPLS network.
What I experienced is that I can't configured the built-in GE port of the SUP720 for Strict Priority & Priority Percent QoS.
Is there anyone outside there know what is the equivalent or alternative to above mentioned two QoS features ? This is mainly to priortize the voice traffic.
Thanks in advance.
Ray.The below has been recommended for a customer using 7600 in the
Core with GiGs as normal core facing links.
The implementation goes as below:
i) Enabling the MLS on the 7600 chassis.
mls qos
ii) Configuring Trust Boundary on all Interfaces.
interface GigabitEthernet1/1
mls qos trust
<--By default the Trust Command trusts the incoming DSCP/TOS.
When the ports are configured with the Trust Boundary as given above,
all incoming packets are mapped into Initial Internal DSCP values.
These values are used purely as a reference MAP for Internal QOS
processing on the 7600.
Internal DSCP Output COS
DSCP 0 7 COS 0
DSCP 8 15 COS 1
DSCP 16 23 COS 2
DSCP 24 31 COS 3
DSCP 32 39 COS 4
DSCP 40 47 COS 5
DSCP 48 55 COS 6
DSCP 56 63 COS 7
This deafault mapping can be modified by modifying the DSCP-COS MAP
within the MLS QOS. The the default mapping are as per standards,
and hence it is not recommended to change the mapping.
iii) Directing Traffic into the appropriate Egress Queue.
Once the incoming traffic is mapped to the Initial Internal DSCP,
and the same gets mapped to the Output COS, these values need to
be directed to the appropriate Queues for the desired QOS behavior
on the MPLS EXP packets.
interface x/x
wrr-queue cos-map
priority-queue cos-map
For Eg:
interface gigabitethernet 1/10
wrr-queue cos-map 2 threshold 2 0
wrr-queue cos-map 3 threshold 2 1 2
wrr-queue cos-map 4 threshold 2 3 4
priority-queue cos-map 1 5 6 7
iv) Defining Queue Bandwidth Limits.
After directing the COS to appropriate queues and then assigning them
to appropriate drop threshold values, it is required to define the
bandwidth allocation per queue. This can be done as below.
!<-- To Set minimum assured bandwidth to COS Queue 1,2 & 3
Use the Bandwdith Percentage command as below.
interface GigabitEthernet 1/1
wrr-queue bandwidth percent !
<--Total of Queue Weights should be =100%
To evenly distribute the available bandwidth during congestion for
all the 4 queues, it is required to set the Queue Scheduling Weights
between all the four Queues. This is done by assigning the queues
weights which are used during WRR scheduling.
!<--Set the Queue-Limit Weights of WRR Scheduling as below
interface GigabitEthernet 1/1
wrr-queue queue-limit
priority-queue queue-limit xx
!<--For Example:
interface GigabitEthernet 1/1
wrr-queue queue-limit 25 20 22
priority-queue queue-limit 33
!<-- The example above does a Queue scheduling for Queue 1 for 25% of BW,
Queue 2 for 20% and Queue 3 for 22 % and Priority Queue has 33 %.
To conclude if you want to use the conventional MQC based toggles,
you will need to use FlexWans with WAN ports or OSM's. Where you can
apply the conventional MQC based toggles.
FOr all the LAN ports in 7600 only hardware queues are supported which
can be controlled using MLS, the difference between SUP and Module based
LAN ports is withing the Scheduling alogirthms supported, the Egress and Ingress
buffers, and the number of queues and drop thresholds available.
For Reference use this link:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/core/cis7600/software/122sr/swcg/qos.htm
HTH-Cheers,
Swaroop
PS:
Policy Map Class Command Restrictions
PFC QoS does not support these policy map class commands:
?bandwidth
?priority
?queue-limit
?random-detect
?set qos-group
?service-policy
Maybe you are looking for
-
I have two tables; The first is my Order table which has a single row for each unique order - there are no duplicate order numbers.The order id column here is called OrderID. The second is my Submissions table which is similar to a transactions table
-
OS 9 Install problem on imac G3
hello all, i have an OS install problem on my imac . I just finished formatting the drive . the drive is paritioned : 1st partition = HD1: 5.5 Gb 2nd partition = HD2 : 2.5 Gb 3rd partition = HD3 : 110+ Gb Then, in order to save some time ( i thought
-
Pricing procedure - Formula / Requirement
Hello, I have a requirement for sales and distribution as follows: Condition ZXXX has the price of the material determined by an access sequence Another condition type (YXXX) has to be reported and it´s value should be calculated as follows: YXXX =
-
Preview is different than final compile? HELP PLEASE
This is a simple test animation, but 2 things go wrong when I compile it 1: the clouds in the compiled version move at different speeds than when I hit "play" in the workstation 2: one of the clouds dissapears (the bottom one), and then reappears ran
-
Screen is suddenly half dark. How do I fix it
Never had problem before. Screen said something about temperature hot. I left it alone and came back to the screen half dark on left side portrait ways. Can I fix?