IP address not used correctly at RT Ping Controllers.vi

It seems to me that the IP address provided to RT Ping Controller.vi and RT Reboot Controller is not used correctly.
What I do is: Set the Subnet flag true and give a numerical IP adress to RT Ping Controller.vi
What I get is the controller information for the controllers on the subnet, even if the IP does NOT match.
Why do I do this? I want to acquire the MAC of the controller specified by the IP to use it for the reset vi.
What I do second is: Set the subnet flag true and give an IP address to RT Reboot Controller.vi and provide a MAC address. The IP address does not match to the controller with the MAC given. The controller with the MAC reboots, independent of having a different IP.
What is going
on here and how can I get the correct MAC for an IP easily (i.e., without looking it up in MAX and typing it in somewhere)?

Try setting the Local Subnet value to FALSE and pass in the IP you want to ping. You should get just details back on the target you specified, including it's MAC address. If the IP isn't a valid RT target, you will get an error.
When Local subnet is set to TRUE, it will attempt to ping all controllers on the local subnet (regardless of the IP address passed in)--requiring you to search the resulting array for the IP you are interested in (and yep.. it might not be there).

Similar Messages

Optimizer not using correct execution plan

Hi ,
DB version : 11.2.0.3
My sql query ran last month 1 hour. But the same sql query today running for four hours. Looks like optimizer is not using correct execution plan. I have used tuning advisor and applied recommended sql profile and query execution is back to normal. I can see statistics are upto date for the tables. Any other factors why the optimizer is not choosing correct execution plan ?
Thanks.

What is the correct plan according to you? Multiple factors cause optimizer to chose a different plan. As a rudimentry example - A binary index column having low cardinality than expected, after new data has been inserted. Never ever expect your query to have same execution plan till the entire lifetime, until the underlying data does not change or nobody changes database settings.
You have to give a lot of information if you are looking for performance tuning. Pls see following thread
https://forums.oracle.com/message/9362003#9362003

Mail does not use correct outgoing server

Problem
Mail in Mavericks (and also IOS6 snf 7) does not use the outgoing smtp server associated with the account being used. This results in either a failure to send or mail being put into the wrong "Sent" folder.
Background
I have most of my non-icloud mail pulled down to a home server from which my laptops and ios devices access various accounts using imap. The local home server also provides smtp and relays all mail to my ISP. Recently I have been switching from an old home server (Mac Mini) to a new one (Raspberry pi running the debian Raspbian version with fetchmail, Dovecot and postfix setup).
While making the changeover I had access to both the old server and the new server enabled on my laptop. Naturally the majority of the settings (Name, email address etc) were the same although the name and address of the server to be used for both incoming and outgoing mail were different. This seemed tp work fine for incoming. However when I tested outgoing mail the copy that should appear in the "sentt" box went missing. This usually indicates some mistake in the setting of the sent mail folder on the accounts but this all checked out.
I eventually found the missing outgoing mail intended to go through the new server in the sent box on the old server. Further trials showed that no matter what I did the outgoing would always default to the old (and therefore first set up) outgoing server.
Deleting the old account and the old outgoing server of course should cure the problem and will eventually be the solution for me when I kill the old server. But i wanted to get to the bottom of the problem in case it reappeared in other contexts. Checking the "use only this server" box produced failure to send rather than the correct result.
Trialing various alterntaive settings showed that the problem occurs when there are two outgoing servers with the email address in the settings and the user name on the outgoing server name being the same. I had assumed that changing the description field would distinguish between the various settings; however this did not work. Changing the Name Field did work eg by putting (O) after my name.
It appears therefore that mail selects the outgoing server on the basis of email address (with the full name included) and user name (trrespective of the actual server or the Description that shows in the smtp server listing. In some ways this is logical but it produces problems in the context I have described and would also be a difficulty if you wanted to use an alternative server when in a different location.
I have trawled support and elsewhere for any thing similar. Lots of mail problems (don't get me started on the way icloud loses outgoing each time you edit the list!) but I have not found any posts on precisiely this point.
IOS devices seem to have similar problems, but a quick attempt at a similar solution does not work, and I cannot be bothered to test the options. I will simply clean them out and put in the new accounts.
Advice
Grateful for any comments or advice from people who have encountered similar problems and whether my diagnosis if correct. Have I missed any obvious corrections that would clear this up. I do not know whether this is a Mavericks issue or also appears in earlier OSX versions.
CPE

Peter,
Where ever the Sent and Trash folders show in the Sidebar, highlight first one, and then the other, followed by clicking on Mailbox in the Menubar, and choosing Use This Mailbox For, and choose the function.
Keep us posted on your progress.
Ernie

Windows File Share not using Correct NIC Interface.

Hi
I have Windows 2012 R2 server with two 1gb NICs. I want to use NIC1 for the regular network traffic/Internet and the NIC2 for database traffic. NIC1 has IP Addresses of 64.141.xxx.xxx (I am not showing the last 6 digits for security reasons)
and 192.168.10.21. NIC2 has the IP Address of 192.168.11.2.
The Workstation accessing this server also has two NICS. NIC1 has the IP address of 64.141.xxx.xxx and 192.168.10.22. NIC2 has the IP Address of 192.168.11.4.
I created a share on the server myDataShare$. On the Workstation I access the share using \\192.168.11.2\myDataShare$ and everything works accept that the data from the share is sent across NIC1 but I want it to go over NIC2. If I add static
routes to both machines it makes no difference all network traffic always goes out on NIC1 for both machines.
If look at the status of each NIC on the send and receive bytes only NIC1 show any traffic. NIC2 is silent. How do I get traffic for the 192.168.11.0/24 subnet to use NIC2?
The strange thing is that if I ping a 192.168.11.0/24 address it goes over NIC2 but file sharing seems to ignore NIC2 altogether.
Thanks,
Simon

Hi Simon,
Windows Vista and later are based on the strong host model. In the strong host model, the host can only send packets on an interface if the interface is assigned the source
IP address of the packet being sent. Also the concept of a primary IP address does not exist.
If the program specifies a source IP address, that IP address is used as the source IP address for connections sourced from that socket and the adapter associated with that
source IP is used as the source interface. The route table is searched but only for routes that can be reached from that source interface.
You can try to set the “skipassource” flag ,by using this flag, the added new addresses are not used for outgoing packets unless explicitly set for use by outgoing packets.
The detail information about skipassource flag:
Source IP address selection on a Multi-Homed Windows Computer
http://blogs.technet.com/b/networking/archive/2009/04/25/source-ip-address-selection-on-a-multi-homed-windows-computer.aspx
The related KB:
How multiple adapters on the same network are expected to behave
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/175767/en-us
The related third party article:
Exchange 2013 on Windows Server 2012 with multiple IP addresses on a single NIC
http://blog.enowsoftware.com/solutions-engine/bid/185076/Exchange-2013-on-Windows-Server-2012-with-multiple-IP-addresses-on-a-single-NIC
I’m glad to be of help to you!
*** This response contains a reference to a third party World Wide Web site. Microsoft is providing this information as a convenience to you. Microsoft does not control these
sites and has not tested any software or information found on these sites; therefore, Microsoft cannot make any representations regarding the quality, safety, or suitability of any software or information found there. There are inherent dangers in the use
of any software found on the Internet, and Microsoft cautions you to make sure that you completely understand the risk before retrieving any software from the Internet. ***
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Correct address not used in MAILTOfield of iCal files

I'm not sure if this is the correct forum for this, as it does have something to do with the GWIA (kind of) but I'm not sure if the GWIa should be responsible for dealing with the situation.
When GroupWise sends out an iCal file, it uses the userid in the email address instead of the preferred internet address. While this typically isn't an issue, we are having issues with some other email services adding the address in the iCal file as another attendee and not showing the original address (the preferred internet address) as having accepted the meeting. This causes further issue if the users of those other email systems modify the appointments, as it ends up removing the appointment from our GroupWise calendars.
For a more visual understanding:
Userid: mhk1234
Preferred Internet Address: [email protected]
Source of email sent when accepting appointment sent by [email protected]
Code:
Received: from mailserver (unknown [127.0.0.1])
by mailgateway with ESMTP id 165EB6FC159
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 15 May 2012 11:43:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailserver ([127.0.0.1]) by mailgateway with ESMTP id EiWHxRmVCUhQMQA8 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 15 May 2012 11:43:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from MTA by mailserver
with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 15 May 2012 11:43:41 -0400
Message-Id: <4FB2416A0200008D000678F7@mailserver>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 8.0.2
Content-class: urn:content-classes:calendarmessage
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 11:43:38 -0400
From: "Carol Heinicke" <[email protected]>
To: "Carol A Heinicke" <[email protected]>
X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Accepted: test2
Subject: Accepted: test2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=__Part5678A6BA.0__="
This is a MIME message. If you are reading this text, you may want to
consider changing to a mail reader or gateway that understands how to
properly handle MIME multipart messages.
--=__Part5678A6BA.0__=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Item Type: Appointment
Start Date: Thursday, 17 May 2012, 08:00:00am (EDT)
Duration: 1 Hour
Place: here
Action: Accepted
This electronic message is intended to be for the named recipient, and may =
contain information that is confidential or privileged. If you are not the =
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, d=
istribution or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. =
If you have received this message in error, or are not the named recipient,=
please notify us immediately by contacting the sender at the electronic ma=
il address noted above, and delete and destroy all copies of this message. =
Thank you.
--=__Part5678A6BA.0__=
Content-class: urn:content-classes:calendarmessage
Content-Type: text/calendar; method=REPLY; name=meeting.ics; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Novell Inc//Groupwise 8.0.2
METHOD:REPLY
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:(GMT-0500) EST
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
DTSTART:20001104T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11
TZNAME:EST
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
DTSTART:20000311T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:Daylight Savings Time
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID="(GMT-0500) EST":20120517T080000
DTSTAMP:20120515T154338Z
ATTENDEE;CN="Mark Kendall";PARTSTAT=ACCEPTED:
MAILTO:[email protected]
ORGANIZER;CN="Some Guy";ROLE=CHAIR:
MAILTO:[email protected]
SUMMARY:test2
LOCATION:here
DTEND;TZID="(GMT-0500) EST":20120517T090000
UID:52fac24d-024e-4079-ac80-298c99a7a2db
PRIORITY:5
CLASS:PUBLIC
X-GWCLASS:NORMAL
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
--=__Part5678A6BA.0__=--
So, is there something we need to change so that iCal files have the correct addresses in them or is this fixed in GroupWise 2012?

Here is another example I happen to own both accounts so both are my name. I removed all IP addresses and changed the domains.
Appointment from outside:
Code:
Return-path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mailgateway.ours.edu ([])
by mailserver.ours.edu with ESMTP; Tue, 22 May 2012 11:19:22 -0400
X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1337699962-04a200340000-O3jTvS
X-Barracuda-URL: http:///cgi-bin/mark.cgi
Received: from mx-tmp.outside.edu (localhost [])
by mailgateway.ours.edu (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 720C0A90B0
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 22 May 2012 11:19:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mx-tmp.outside.edu (mx-tmp.outside.edu []) by mailgateway.ours.edu with ESMTP id Y7SNFPBBn2Xt6XNN (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for <[email protected]>; Tue, 22 May 2012 11:19:22 -0400 (EDT)
X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: [email protected]
Received: from avs02.service.private (avs02.service.private [])
by mta03.service.private
(Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.13 (built Jun 8 2005))
with ESMTP id <[email protected]> for
[email protected]; Tue, 22 May 2012 11:19:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mta-avs03.service.private
(mta-avs03.service.private [])
by avs02.service.private (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4MFIV9j003016 for
<[email protected]>; Tue,
22 May 2012 11:19:20 -0400 (EDT envelope-from [email protected])
Received: from wmu-mailstore02.merit.edu
(wmu-mailstore02.merit.edu [])
by mta03.service.private (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.13
(built Jun 8 2005)) with ESMTP id <[email protected]> for
[email protected]; Tue, 22 May 2012 11:18:48 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 11:18:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Doug Jaquays <[email protected]>
X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Test
Subject: Test
X-Originating-IP: []
To: [email protected]
Message-id: <2096173697.114690.1337699927851.JavaMail.root@wmu-mailstore02>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.15_GA_2995 (zclient/6.0.15_GA_2995)
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Boundary_(ID_ImJ4PLpNObjAdaPs3nf0OQ)"
X-WMU-PMX-Version: 5.5.9.395186, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379,
Antispam-Data: 2012.5.22.150615 - Tue May 22 11:19:21 2012
X-WMU-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIIII, Probability=9% on Tue May 22 11:19:21 2012,
Report=' HTML_50_70 0.1, HTML_NO_HTTP 0.1, SUBJ_1WORD 0.1,
BODYTEXTH_SIZE_10000_LESS 0, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0,
BODY_SIZE_3000_3999 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0,
FROM_EDU_TLD 0, INVALID_MSGID_NO_FQDN 0, SPF_NEUTRAL 0, WEBMAIL_SOURCE 0,
WEBMAIL_XOIP 0, WEBMAIL_X_IP_HDR 0, __ANY_URI 0, __CT 0,
__CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0,
__HAS_HTML 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_XOIP 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_HTML 0,
__MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0,
__TO_NO_NAME 0, __URI_NO_PATH 0, __URI_NO_WWW 0, __URI_NS '
X-Barracuda-Connect: mx-tmp.outside.edu[]
X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1337699962
X-Barracuda-Encrypted: RC4-MD5
X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210
X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at ours.edu
X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02
X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1.8 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.3 tests=HTML_MESSAGE
X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.97691
Rule breakdown below
pts rule name description
0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
--Boundary_(ID_ImJ4PLpNObjAdaPs3nf0OQ)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
The following is a new meeting request:
Subject: Test
Organizer: [email protected]
Location: Here
Time: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 from 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM America/New_York
Invitees: [email protected]
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
--Boundary_(ID_ImJ4PLpNObjAdaPs3nf0OQ)
Content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
<html><body><h3>The following is a new meeting request:</h3>
<p>
<table border='0'>
<tr><th valign='top' align='left'>Subject:</th><td>Test</td></tr>
<tr><th valign='top' align='left'>Organizer:</th><td>[email protected]</td></tr>
</table>
<p>
<table border='0'>
<tr><th valign='top' align='left'>Location:</th><td>Here</td></tr>
<tr><th valign='top' align='left'>Time:</th><td>Tuesday, May 22, 2012 from 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM <span style='color: #686357'>America/New_York</span></td></tr>
</table>
<p>
<table border='0'>
<tr><th valign='top' align='left'>Invitees:</th><td>[email protected]</td></tr></table>
<div>*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*</div><br></body></html>
--Boundary_(ID_ImJ4PLpNObjAdaPs3nf0OQ)
Content-type: text/calendar; charset=utf-8; method=REQUEST; name=meeting.ics
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-disposition: attachment; filename=meeting.ics
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:Zimbra-Calendar-Provider
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:REQUEST
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:19710101T020000
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;WKST=MO;INTERVAL=1;BYMONTH=11;BYDAY=1SU
TZNAME:EST
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:19710101T020000
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;WKST=MO;INTERVAL=1;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=2SU
TZNAME:EDT
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:171ace1e-09bd-4720-a30c-84dbfa2ed5de
SUMMARY:Test
LOCATION:Here
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:jaquays
@ours.edu
ORGANIZER:mailto:[email protected]
DTSTART;TZID="America/New_York":20120522T140000
DTEND;TZID="America/New_York":20120522T150000
STATUS:CONFIRMED
CLASS:PUBLIC
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-INTENDEDSTATUS:BUSY
TRANSP:OPAQUE
DTSTAMP:20120522T151847Z
SEQUENCE:0
DESCRIPTION:The following is a new meeting request:\n\nSubject: Test\nOrgani
zer: [email protected]\n\nLocation: Here\nTime: Tuesday\, May 22\, 2012
from 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM America/New_York\n\nInvitees: [email protected]\n
\n*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*\n\n
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<html><body><h3>The following is a new meeting
request:</h3>\n\n<p>\n<table border='0'>\n<tr><th valign='top' align='left'>
Subject:</th><td>Test</td></tr>\n<tr><th valign='top' align='left'>Organizer
:</th><td>[email protected]</td></tr>\n</table>\n\n<p>\n<table border='
0'>\n<tr><th valign='top' align='left'>Location:</th><td>Here</td></tr>\n<tr
><th valign='top' align='left'>Time:</th><td>Tuesday\, May 22\, 2012 from 2:
00 PM - 3:00 PM <span style='color: #686357'>America/New_York</span></td></t
r>\n</table>\n<p>\n<table border='0'>\n\n<tr><th valign='top' align='left'>I
nvitees:</th><td>[email protected]</td></tr></table>\n<div>*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
*~*~*</div><br></body></html>
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
--Boundary_(ID_ImJ4PLpNObjAdaPs3nf0OQ)--
My acknowledgement:
Code:
Return-Path: [email protected]
Received: from proxy01.outside.edu (LHLO proxy01.outside.edu)
(10.108.1.55) by wmu-mailstore02.outside.edu with LMTP; Tue, 22 May 2012
11:29:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mx-tmp.outside.edu (mx-tmp.outside.edu [])
by proxy01.outside.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F2A102BB61
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 22 May 2012 11:29:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from avs04.service.private (avs04.service.private [])
by mta03.service.private
(Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.13 (built Jun 8 2005))
with ESMTP id <[email protected]> for [email protected]
(ORCPT [email protected]); Tue, 22 May 2012 11:29:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mta-avs03.service.private
(mta-avs03.service.private [])
by avs04.service.private (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4MFSxFW024753 for
<[email protected]>; Tue,
22 May 2012 11:29:00 -0400 (EDT envelope-from [email protected])
Received: from mailgateway.ours.edu (mailgateway.ours.edu [])
by mta03.service.private
(Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.13 (built Jun 8 2005))
with ESMTPS id <[email protected]> for
[email protected] (ORCPT [email protected]); Tue,
22 May 2012 11:28:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailserver.ours.edu (unknown [])
by mailgateway.ours.edu (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 461B36FC159
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 22 May 2012 11:28:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailserver.ours.edu ([])
by mailgateway.ours.edu with ESMTP id LLo6Jrxzne9upWoz for
<[email protected]>; Tue, 22 May 2012 11:28:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from KCMS-MTA by mailserver.ours.edu with Novell_GroupWise; Tue,
22 May 2012 11:28:58 -0400
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 11:28:54 -0400
From: Doug Jaquays <[email protected]>
Subject: Accepted: Test
To: Doug Jaquays <[email protected]>
Message-id: <[email protected]>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 8.0.2
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Boundary_(ID_qC6PCHl2hokBeG2aJp/IMQ)"
Content-class: urn:content-classes:calendarmessage
X-WMU-PMX-Version: 5.5.9.395186, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379,
Antispam-Data: 2012.3.13.151816 - Tue May 22 11:29:02 2012
X-WMU-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8% on Tue May 22 11:29:26 2012,
Report=' HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, SUPERLONG_LINE 0.05,
BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_2999 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0,
BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, DATE_TZ_NA 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0, NO_URI_FOUND 0,
SPF_PASS 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0,
__CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0,
__MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0'
This is a MIME message. If you are reading this text, you may want to
consider changing to a mail reader or gateway that understands how to
properly handle MIME multipart messages.
--Boundary_(ID_qC6PCHl2hokBeG2aJp/IMQ)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Item Type: Appointment
Start Date: Tuesday, 22 May 2012, 02:00:00pm (EDT)
Duration: 1 Hour
Place: Here
Action: Accepted
This electronic message is intended to be for the named recipient, and may contain information that is confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, or are not the named recipient, please notify us immediately by contacting the sender at the electronic mail address noted above, and delete and destroy all copies of this message. Thank you.
--Boundary_(ID_qC6PCHl2hokBeG2aJp/IMQ)
Content-type: text/calendar; method=REPLY; name=meeting.ics; charset=UTF-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-disposition: attachment; filename=meeting.ics
Content-class: urn:content-classes:calendarmessage
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Novell Inc//Groupwise 8.0.2
METHOD:REPLY
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:(GMT-0500) EST
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
DTSTART:20001104T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11
TZNAME:EST
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
DTSTART:20000311T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:Daylight Savings Time
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID="(GMT-0500) EST":20120522T140000
DTSTAMP:20120522T152854Z
ATTENDEE;CN="Doug Jaquays";PARTSTAT=ACCEPTED:MAILTO:[email protected]
ORGANIZER;CN="Doug Jaquays";ROLE=CHAIR:MAILTO:[email protected]
SUMMARY:Test
LOCATION:Here
DTEND;TZID="(GMT-0500) EST":20120522T150000
UID:171ace1e-09bd-4720-a30c-84dbfa2ed5de
PRIORITY:5
CLASS:PUBLIC
X-GWCLASS:NORMAL
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
--Boundary_(ID_qC6PCHl2hokBeG2aJp/IMQ)--

E-BUSINESS - OBIEE Email addresses not updating correctly

I am using out of the box configuration from E-Business to OBIEE, we currently have an issue where the Email addresses are not being updated correctly. When email addresses change in EBS due to a person getting married etc. I thought if i put in a headcount at the end of the report in the presentation layer this may fix the issue but it is picking up the old email address. What I need is the latest email address listed in all reports, Is this a known issue from EBS - OBIEE or can this be fixed via ETL or at RPD level?

Are you reporting directly off EBS tables or are you using BI Apps and have an analytics warehouse populated by ETL routines ?
Two reasons spring to mind why your not seeing your up to date data :
the warehouse has not been updated from the source system (yet), perform an ETL refresh to load the new data into the warehouse.
or
BI Cache is on, you need to clear the cache to view the most recent data, the BI Server does not know when the source tables change (without use of an Event Polling table)
to clear the cache : Administration tool (online ) -> Manage -> Cache -> Highlight all and hit delete.
Hope this helps,
Alastair

Outlook 2013 & Proxied accounts, FROM address not defaulting correctly

Hello,
We are hosted by Microsoft for our email. We have been on Outlook 2010 for a couple of years without any issues. I have proxy access to two other mailboxes for support purposes. Up until last Thursday, when I replied to an email in the support mailbox, the
default FROM address was the address for that mailbox. Last Thursday, something changed somewhere so the default FROM address is now my personal mailbox. I do have access to send mail from the proxied accounts so it isn't a rights issue. I am able to change
the FROM address each time I reply but this is cumbersome. My personal email should never be going out on replies but remembering has been a chore since it always used to work correctly.
Our helpdesk had me install a plugin called unisend which did fix one related issue but didn't correct the issue I'm experiencing. I have talked with our senior network engineer and mail administrator and both confirm they did not make any changes. I did
upgrade my PC to Office 2013 in hopes that something became corrupted with my installation (that the upgrade would fix) but that did not correct the problem.
Ideas?

Hi there,
We have received many reports as your description since last week. It sounds like the sending behavior in Outlook 2010 has been changed by some Windows/Office update and goes back to the behavior before.
Before we go any further, I have to mention some of the history for Outlook 2010. In Outlook 2010 without SP1, Mailto’s will use the default/principal account for message when you use Microsoft Outlook 2010 which has multiple accounts delivered to different
data file. However, in later version (Outlook 2010 SP1/SP2), Outlook doesn’t use the default account set in Account settings for new messages. Instead, it uses the account associated with the mailbox or *.pst file you have in focus.
Actually, this behavior is controlled by the registry keys. At this point, I suggest we check the following registry entries are exist and set it to the proper value.
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\XX.0\Outlook\Options\Mail
DWORD value: NewItemsUseDefaultSendingAccount
Value type: REG_DWORD: 1 for force, 0 to disable.
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Office\XX.0\outlook\options
Value Name: ForceAccountSelection
Value type: REG_DWORD: 1 for force, 0 to disable.
Close the registry editor and restart Outlook to check if the behavior what you want would come back.
In addition, our Outlook MVP, Diane Poremsky has written an article with more detail information:
http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/outlook-2010/multiple-accounts-and-the-default-account/
By the way, we still cannot figure out which update is the root of the issue, if someone could test it and share the result here, I would appreciate that. Feel free to post back.
Tony Chen
TechNet Community Support

Email Address Not Converting Correctly from .doc to .pdf

I'm attempting to convert a Microsoft Word document to a PDF. I have an email address in the footer of the document that reads [email protected] but when I convert it to a PDF, the hyperlink doesn't work correctly. When I click on the hyperlink in the PDF, it brings up the email address as [email protected] It completely cuts off the first name! The full email address displays correctly, but when you click on it, it cuts off the entire first name before the period.
Please help!

Be sure you use PDF Maker for the conversion. If that does not help, put such addresses in quotes and see if that does the job.

Sometimes Local Address not in ARP table and Ping fails (network problem?)

I see something like this on our network a couple of times a week.
The same replies have been received from different hosts.
ping fails
local subnet machine is not in arp table
ping fails
local subnet machine is not in arp table
traceroute may or maynot succeed
If traceroute succeeds an entry is in the arp table
if traceroute fails no entry will be in the arp table.
A netstat -s, ont the local host, doesn't show any thing strange except that udpNoPorts=10844982 (Unfortunately I don't know what udpNoPorts is)
The remote host IS UP.
Does anyone have an idea as to why this is happening?
Can our 100mb network, which is not that busy, be loosing that many ICMP or ARP messages?
This is a problem because I'm the guy getting paged if a system is down.
Local host is Solaris 7 on same subnet at IP 168.173.8.8
Remote hosts are usually NT boxes.
/usr/sbin/ping -svR stpaul_web2 56 3
----stpaul_web2.agribank.com PING Statistics----
3 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
/usr/sbin/arp stpaul_web2
stpaul_web2 (168.173.8.143) -- no entry
/usr/sbin/ping -svR stpaul_web2 56 3
----stpaul_web2.agribank.com PING Statistics----
3 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
/usr/sbin/arp stpaul_web2
stpaul_web2 (168.173.8.143) -- no entry
/usr/sbin/traceroute stpaul_web2
1 stpaul_web2.AGRIBANK.COM (168.173.8.143) 2995.868 ms 0.231 ms 0.211 ms
/usr/sbin/arp stpaul_web2
stpaul_web2 (168.173.8.143) at 0:1:2:cc:a3:51
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Ks

Hi,
I Think you need to do Teaming on the servers.
++ configure etherchannel between switch and the server.
configuring etherchannel b/w 4503 and server:
================================
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk213/technologies_configuration_example09186a008089a821.shtml
Sample NIC Teaming - HP NICs with Cisco Switches (EtherChannel) :
==============================================
http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX434260
There are several NIC teaming technologies available today from switch vendors. Cisco uses the term “EtherChannel.” Various switch vendors use various terms, and these may or may not provide the same exact functionality. Use of EtherChannel technology requires support from the server hardware vendor, NIC vendor, and Layer-2 switch vendor.
Hope this helps
Cheers
Somu
Rate helpful posts

Address not showing correctly in quotation Smartform

Hi Guru's,
We created smartforms for Quotaions. Based on Plant we selecting address.
For some quotaions address template table displaying fine. For few quotations its not working fine in printprivew mode.
Template table is same length for all. Also i checked for items . For some quotations items are more than 20 its also working fine. For some quotations items are 1 or 2 but its not working fine. Plz give any suggestions
Thanks & Regards,
Meenakshi.

Hi rajesh,
Thanks for viewing my thread..
Actually we created smartforms for Quotations. Based on plant we are picking address and displaying dynamically.
while executing it shows correctly for some sales document no's and not displaying for some sales documents no's..
Can you give some suggestion why this occuring
Meenakshi

Home address not shown correctly

Hello all,
   I just got my first iPhone today, the iPhone 4s, very happy I am.
   I also have an iPad 2 both have a similar issue.
   In my contact card I have my home address as
84 Beaconhurst Drive
Beacon Bay
East London
5241
South Africa
When I search for this address in maps, the maps more or less finds my address, albeit about 2 km out. However when I click the address on my address card it just slaps a pin in the middle of East London, and does the same for my work address, and any other address I have tried.
When I add a point to a map and try add that to my contact, all that comes up is Eastern Cape, East London.
This leaves me with two problems
1   When I Ask siri what is the weather for tomorrow, I am told, there is no weather for eastern cape, south Africa, despite the fact that the weather app is picking up my location.
2. When I tell Siri, remind me to xxx when I arrive at home, I am told Siri does not know where my home is.
Please help me ASAP, cause that feature is something I have been looking forward to, since I saw the ads.
Thanx

the problem isn't your iPhone - apple uses google maps to determine your location and secondly Siri location based services doesn't play 100% nicely in SA yet - it does work - mine does in Cape Town - weather, location based reminders etc.
try adding your location/s manually to your iPhone by using Maps and then using your address book to add those locations and then try the location based reminders again - might work.

VNic Mac addresses not associated correctly when installing OVM Server

We are trying to get our first Oracle VM environment running and noticed that on the UCS the mac assocated with eth0 ended with 0B but on the Oracle install the eth0 interface mac address ends with 08. The mac for eth3 on the Oracle install lines up with what the UCS sees as eth0. How do we correct this and ensure the interfaces line up so that eth0 on the UCS is eth0 on the Oracle service profile ?

This is going to depend on how Oralce numerates the PCI BUS. That will dictate which PCI device the OS sees in which order.
You can try manipulating the order using a vNIC placement policy. This will allow you to ensure certain vNIC/vHBAs appear first on the PCI BUS for the host.
Regards,
Robert

Wine - not using correct fonts under Xorg 7.0

How can I tell Wine to use fonts from the correct location under Xorg 7.0? There's nothing in winecfg that I can see related to it, and no file in /etc/wine to alter...

Snowman wrote:wine 0.9.5-1 was out today. Did you try it?
I did indeed, but sadly it had no effect.

Oracle not using correct index

Hi,
I have a fact table (a big table) and a dimension table representing dates.
My query is
select fdat.*, dd.dim_date from fdat_bitmap fdat, dim_dates dd where
fdat.dim_date_id = dd.dim_date_id
and dd.dim_date > TO_DATE('2011-12-20 00:00:00' , 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS');
and the corresponding plan is:
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 76M| 9173M| 709K (1)| 02:21:51 |
|* 1 | HASH JOIN | | 76M| 9173M| 709K (1)| 02:21:51 |
|* 2 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| UI_DD_DATES_ID | 6951 | 97314 | 8 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | FDAT_BITMAP | 198M| 20G| 708K (1)| 02:21:39 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
1 - access("FDAT"."DIM_DATE_ID"="DD"."DIM_DATE_ID")
2 - filter("DD"."DIM_DATE">TO_DATE(' 2011-12-20 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd
hh24:mi:ss'))
17 rows selected
When I change the query to:
select fdat.*, dd.dim_date from fdat_bitmap fdat, dim_dates dd where
fdat.dim_date_id = dd.dim_date_id
and fdat.dim_date_id > 20111220;
Explain plan changes to:
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 390K| 46M| 43958 (1)| 00:08:48 |
| 1 | MERGE JOIN | | 390K| 46M| 43958 (1)| 00:08:48 |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | FDAT_BITMAP | 390K| 41M| 43948 (1)| 00:08:48 |
| 3 | BITMAP CONVERSION TO ROWIDS| | | | | |
|* 4 | BITMAP INDEX RANGE SCAN | I_FDATB_DIM_DID | | | | |
|* 5 | SORT JOIN | | 6991 | 97874 | 9 (12)| 00:00:01 |
|* 6 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | UI_DD_DATES_ID | 6991 | 97874 | 8 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
4 - access("FDAT"."DIM_DATE_ID">20111220)
filter("FDAT"."DIM_DATE_ID">20111220)
5 - access("FDAT"."DIM_DATE_ID"="DD"."DIM_DATE_ID")
filter("FDAT"."DIM_DATE_ID"="DD"."DIM_DATE_ID")
6 - filter("DD"."DIM_DATE_ID">20111220)
22 rows selected
My question is why the first query not resulting in the plan similar to second one ? How can make it come with plan similar to the second one without changing the query ?
Thanks,
-Rakesh

user12257218 wrote:
My query is
select fdat.*, dd.dim_date from fdat_bitmap fdat, dim_dates dd where
fdat.dim_date_id = dd.dim_date_id
and dd.dim_date > TO_DATE('2011-12-20 00:00:00' , 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS');When I change the query to:
select fdat.*, dd.dim_date from fdat_bitmap fdat, dim_dates dd where
fdat.dim_date_id = dd.dim_date_id
and fdat.dim_date_id > 20111220;My question is why the first query not resulting in the plan similar to second one ? How can make it come with plan similar to the second one without changing the query ?
To a very large extent this is because the two queries are not logically equivalent - unless you have a constraint in place that enforces the rule that:
dd.dim_date_id > 20111220 if, and only if, dd.dim_date > TO_DATE('2011-12-20 00:00:00' , 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS')
A constraint like: (dim_date_id = to_number(to_char(dim_date,'yyyymmdd'))) might help - provided both columns also have NOT NULL declarations (or "is not null" constraints), and provided that that's appropriate for the way your application works.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com
Author: <b><em>Oracle Core</em></b>

MOVED: Graphics cards not using correct generation of PCIe

This topic has been moved to GAMING Motherboards.
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=253322.0

Quote from: jdthedj69 on 19-February-15, 09:12:38
Well see that's the weird thing, I've read a little about this and a lot of people have it switch when the render test runs because of power saving features in the graphics cards and such, but mine does the opposite, it starts in 3.0 and within 5 to 10 seconds switches down to 1.1.
if the freq. drops, it will also drop the gen version, its power saving feature of the card
stress the card with furmark or better render then watch out the gen version

IP address not used correctly at RT Ping Controllers.vi

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for