IP4 white balance camera app.

Okay, the white balance issue is getting pretty irritating, especially when I email photos or video directly from my phone. Rarely did I color correct the images on my original iPhone, seems like every image needs to be fix on my IP4.
Has anyone found a camera app. that will do color correction or adjust the white balance for photos and videos?
Thanks,

I use photogene. It works perfectly.

Similar Messages

  • White balance camera raw

    When I open a raw image in camera raw, the white balance sliders are alread at their maximum, making it impossible to improve the image. Teh default white balance window appears as "as shot".

    Try clicking on the pull-down menu to the right of “As Shot” and then choose another WB type or choose custom.

  • Does Aperture always apply white balance to RAW files?

    Hi Aperture users,
    I have been an Aperture user for many years.  Aperture handles the white balance of my Canon XTi RAW files just as I want it to: it interprets the RAW data by applying the white balance selected at the time of the photo.  I.e., when Aperture decodes the RAW file, it makes it look more-or-less like the in-camera JPG with respect to the white balance.
    However, in the past several months, many well-known contributors of this forum have stated "RAW is RAW -- Aperture will not apply any camera settings."  This statement was made in response to many "novice" questions about why a RAW photo in Aperture did not look anything like the JPG from the camera.
    So, my questions:
    Does anyone have a camera to whose RAW files Aperture does not apply in-camera white balance settings?
    Does everyone else agree that this exception to "RAW is RAW" is acceptable?
    thanks,
    nathan

    Hi Nathan -- I was hoping someone much more informed than me would weigh in with some engineering truth.  All I got on offer is the thin gruel of observation.
    Mr Endo wrote:
    So, my questions:
    Does anyone have a camera to whose RAW files Aperture does not apply in-camera white balance settings?
    Does everyone else agree that this exception to "RAW is RAW" is acceptable?
    1. I don't.  RAW is sensor data.  Most cameras record the White Balance camera setting as a metadata tag attached to the RAW data  (The WB has no effect at all on the captured data.)  Most RAW converters use this setting as the default WB.  Some RAW converters perform "colorimetric interpretation" -- they basically compare the data captured to a generic color space and assign a WB.  (This is, I assume, the same thing a camera set to "Auto WB" does.  My camera is superb at assigning a WB for any mixed scene; it's repeatably bad, though, whenever the actual scene is truly colored (meaning "away from average").)  In both cases -- 1. using the attached-to-the-RAW-data WB, and 2. analyzing the captured data to intelligently predict the WB -- a WB is applied to the RAW data.  It has to be, in order to produce an image from the data.
    2.  The problem here isn't that this is an exception -- it's that different people mean different things when they say "RAW".  The RAW data is RAW data.  As above, the WB setting has no effect on it.  But the image derived from the data -- any image produced from the data -- much have a WB set (and, for human use, a tone-curve applied).  Some people mistaken think that RAW is an image format, or that the image produced by the RAW converter is a "RAW" image.  It is not.  RAW data must be converted to an image format in order to be displayed as an image.  The conversion must apply a WB.
    I have found it useful (though perhaps mistaken) to conceive of my data-gathering to picture-making as following these steps:
    . Capture a pattern of light.  This is just data.
    . Convert the data to an image.  RAW conversion done by Aperture.  (NB: the settings for this can be changed.)
    . Adjust the image to my artistic satisfaction
    . Convert the adjusted image to an image format file
    . Publish the image-format file in one or two now standard forms: to be viewed on a computer monitor, or as a print.
    I mention only because at some point I consciously added the "Convert data to image" step in order to better grasp the process.  RAW data is RAW data -- but that step identifies an intermediate that many overlook.  At that step the information recorded along with the RAW data and stored in the RAW file is applied to the RAW data.
    To me, "RAW is RAW" is correct.  "Aperture will not apply any camera settings," is wrong.
    I am happy for any clarifications or corrections.

  • Will the iphone 4s  on 19th sept when ios6 comes  whit panorama camera

    hello i have seen on the keynote about panoramic stuff whit the camera app will that be avaiable whit iphone 4s on the ios6 update on 19th september ?
    Kind regards

    Yes.
    http://www.apple.com/iphone/compare-iphones/

  • Why does adobe camera raw keep saving images with the incorrect white balance?

    I am having an issue when I edit images.  here is the scenerio:
    I choose 50 Raw files and open them in Camera Raw.
    I edit each individually - many of them have different white balances.
    Once I have each image how I want them, I select all and click done.
    Sometimes all the edits are saved correctly, but very often all the changes are saved correctly except white balance.  The program seems to take the white balance from one image and applies it to all the images.
    Why???  Very frustrating to have to go back and individually edit all the white balances again.
    Thanks!

    It seems to not happen if I slow down a few seconds before I click select all and then done.
    That should not be the problem, once you changed settings and hitting done they all should be applied immediately. It even is not needed to first select all, that is only needed when you need to open or save the files.
      But I still don't know why it would only change the white balance in every shot and not everything.
    If it happens again could you first in Bridge select one of the none changed files and with right mouse click menu choose select purge cache for selection?
    And can you provide more details about system version, app versions and file types?

  • Can camera white balance be adjusted?

    A friend of mine has taken some images that look like old images that have weathered/faded over time, but they are brand new!  I suggested that it looked like the white balance was set wrong.  Is there any way to adjust it (it looked like it was set to florescent lighting)?

    The default Camera app does not have an adjustment for white balance. But there are other camera apps in the App Store that have this feature. There are also photo editing apps that allow changes to white balance. The iPhoto app is one of many.

  • Can you remove the camera white balance setting in Aperture

    I have a Canon 7D and use Aperture for processing and storing my images.
    With the Canon I shoot both video and still and frequently adjust the white balance in the camera.  I make a frequent mistake in leaving the wrong white balance setting on - eg when taking video indoors in the evening  I set the white balance to indoors (the Canon seems poor at white balance decision making on video) and then I forget I'm not using auto white balance and switch to taking a photo with flash.  The result is a horrible blue photo - which if I don't spot the problem at the time seems very hard to correct afterwards.
    I use the Aperture white balance adjustments frequently but unless there is a patch or white or grey I an use the dropper on, I find this particular situation seems to be right off the scale of what I can fix in Aperture.  I end up with sliders at the extremes of the scales and no intuitive sense of what numbers to type in manually to try and get realistic colour - so I often end up discarding these photos even if the shot itself is something I'd like to use.
    So my question is given I'm importing RAW, is there a way to show the phoo without the (wrong) white balance setting I applied in the camera, to let me choose white balance from scratch?
    Or if not, do you have any advice about how to adjust from this very bluey unrealistic colour of image?

    Kirkby - thanks for the quick reply.
    Didn't know you could drag inside a value field - that's helpful.
    But being able to get different numbers on the slider isn't the root of my problem.
    In a specific example I have two photos - one taken with white balance set to flash and the photo was with flash, where after a bit of tweaking to get the colour I want the temp slider is at 5000K (and tint 0).  The second photo has my shooting error with interior lighting white balance but taken with flash.  The two shots were taken from almost the same point of the same view (but different people in frame).  The shot with the white balance error comes off camera horribly blue coloured. I can fiddle with the two sliders - I take temperature to 20000K and tint to 40 to do the best with it I can, and with those settings one of the two faces is approaching flesh colour but the wall behind the subjects (which is a light blue in reality) is now appearing light yellow in places.  I just can't get a good looking colour effect no matter ow extreme the slider settings.
    I may have phrased my question badly - as I totally agree you can't show a raw without a colour setting - so maybe I'm better asking to be able to use a different colour setting on the raw data rather than having to start with adjustments on top of my white balance mistake.
    Given the two shots were in the same place against the same background and the same lighting (both with flash) it seems to me I ought to be able to get a similar colour effect on both and I just can't.  To illustrate here are the two photos (the one on the left was shot with flash wb and in Aperture I'm viewing it with 5000K and 0 tint, the one on the right was shot with indoor wb and in Aperture I'm viewing it with 20000K and 40 tint and it looks terrible!)
    https://www.box.com/shared/qle3t6ovyhrd1egez3vc

  • Lightroom: Why does auto white balance no longer work after changing the camera calibration profile?

    I'm using NEF raw files from Nikon.
    Lets say for example I import a NEF file into Lightroom (v4) and click on 'auto' for white balance. The white balance in the image is  adjusted correctly (somewhat). However, if I then change the camera profile (in the camera calibration section) from 'adobe standard' to 'camera standard' then the white balance in the image becomes very wrong. I then have to set the white balance back to 'as shot' and correct it manually instead.
    Why would 'auto white balance' no longer work just because I change the profile from 'adobe standard' to 'camera standard'?
    Any ideas?

    Works as expected here...
    Which Lr version and what OS??

  • White Balance in Camera raw

    Every time I open an image from Bridge in CS6, into camera raw the white balance always defaults  to fluorescent.  How can I change default opening to read as"shot as"?

    Hi there! Because the forum you originally posted in is for beginners trying to learn the basics of Photoshop, I moved your question to the Camera Raw forum, where you'll get more specialized help.

  • Adobe DNG converter is corrupting NEF files. The color is way off and it's not the camera white balance.

    I was using the converter for a few months and it was working fine. Now it will convert the files, but the color is really messed. I know it is not the white balance, because the same files convert fine to TIF files through Nikon's software. I am using this converter for Nikon d610 NEF files. Here's a sample DNG and the same image in TIF. Can anyone help? Thanks!

    When you use the DNG Converter to make a DNG from an NEF, the DNG Converter applies the default Camera Raw settings.  When I open your DNG it looks fine, but when you open it, it looks off.  That is because you've some how set your Camera Raw defaults to have a bunch of customized settings specific to a particular picture, instead of having them all be normal settings.  Below you'll see what Photoshop is saying the settings of the DNG-Converted-JPG are, with the non-defaults marked in bold.  The main problems are the WB being custom and a bunch of HSL setting changes.
    Here is what Photoshop reports that the JPG was created using:
          <rdf:Description rdf:about=""
                xmlns:crs="http://ns.adobe.com/camera-raw-settings/1.0/">
             <crs:RawFileName>hug_8290_0215_1.dng</crs:RawFileName>
             <crs:Version>6.0</crs:Version>
             <crs:ProcessVersion>5.7</crs:ProcessVersion>
             <crs:WhiteBalance>Custom</crs:WhiteBalance>
             <crs:Temperature>5732</crs:Temperature>
             <crs:Tint>+26</crs:Tint>
             <crs:Exposure>0.00</crs:Exposure>
             <crs:Shadows>5</crs:Shadows>
             <crs:Brightness>+50</crs:Brightness>
             <crs:Contrast>+25</crs:Contrast>
             <crs:Saturation>-4</crs:Saturation>
             <crs:Sharpness>90</crs:Sharpness>
             <crs:LuminanceSmoothing>0</crs:LuminanceSmoothing>
             <crs:ColorNoiseReduction>25</crs:ColorNoiseReduction>
             <crs:ChromaticAberrationR>0</crs:ChromaticAberrationR>
             <crs:ChromaticAberrationB>0</crs:ChromaticAberrationB>
             <crs:VignetteAmount>0</crs:VignetteAmount>
             <crs:ShadowTint>0</crs:ShadowTint>
             <crs:RedHue>0</crs:RedHue>
             <crs:RedSaturation>+11</crs:RedSaturation>
             <crs:GreenHue>0</crs:GreenHue>
             <crs:GreenSaturation>0</crs:GreenSaturation>
             <crs:BlueHue>+12</crs:BlueHue>
             <crs:BlueSaturation>+2</crs:BlueSaturation>
             <crs:FillLight>0</crs:FillLight>
             <crs:Vibrance>-6</crs:Vibrance>
             <crs:HighlightRecovery>0</crs:HighlightRecovery>
             <crs:Clarity>0</crs:Clarity>
             <crs:Defringe>0</crs:Defringe>
             <crs:HueAdjustmentRed>0</crs:HueAdjustmentRed>
             <crs:HueAdjustmentOrange>0</crs:HueAdjustmentOrange>
             <crs:HueAdjustmentYellow>+1</crs:HueAdjustmentYellow>
             <crs:HueAdjustmentGreen>+5</crs:HueAdjustmentGreen>
             <crs:HueAdjustmentAqua>0</crs:HueAdjustmentAqua>
             <crs:HueAdjustmentBlue>-9</crs:HueAdjustmentBlue>
             <crs:HueAdjustmentPurple>0</crs:HueAdjustmentPurple>
             <crs:HueAdjustmentMagenta>0</crs:HueAdjustmentMagenta>
             <crs:SaturationAdjustmentRed>-2</crs:SaturationAdjustmentRed>
             <crs:SaturationAdjustmentOrange>+14</crs:SaturationAdjustmentOrange>
             <crs:SaturationAdjustmentYellow>+25</crs:SaturationAdjustmentYellow>
             <crs:SaturationAdjustmentGreen>+26</crs:SaturationAdjustmentGreen>
             <crs:SaturationAdjustmentAqua>0</crs:SaturationAdjustmentAqua>
             <crs:SaturationAdjustmentBlue>+32</crs:SaturationAdjustmentBlue>
             <crs:SaturationAdjustmentPurple>0</crs:SaturationAdjustmentPurple>
             <crs:SaturationAdjustmentMagenta>0</crs:SaturationAdjustmentMagenta>
             <crs:LuminanceAdjustmentRed>+40</crs:LuminanceAdjustmentRed>
             <crs:LuminanceAdjustmentOrange>+13</crs:LuminanceAdjustmentOrange>
             <crs:LuminanceAdjustmentYellow>+3</crs:LuminanceAdjustmentYellow>
             <crs:LuminanceAdjustmentGreen>+15</crs:LuminanceAdjustmentGreen>
             <crs:LuminanceAdjustmentAqua>+3</crs:LuminanceAdjustmentAqua>
             <crs:LuminanceAdjustmentBlue>+4</crs:LuminanceAdjustmentBlue>
             <crs:LuminanceAdjustmentPurple>0</crs:LuminanceAdjustmentPurple>
             <crs:LuminanceAdjustmentMagenta>0</crs:LuminanceAdjustmentMagenta>
             <crs:SplitToningShadowHue>231</crs:SplitToningShadowHue>
             <crs:SplitToningShadowSaturation>32</crs:SplitToningShadowSaturation>
             <crs:SplitToningHighlightHue>45</crs:SplitToningHighlightHue>
             <crs:SplitToningHighlightSaturation>33</crs:SplitToningHighlightSaturation>
             <crs:SplitToningBalance>+74</crs:SplitToningBalance>
             <crs:ParametricShadows>-39</crs:ParametricShadows>
             <crs:ParametricDarks>-7</crs:ParametricDarks>
             <crs:ParametricLights>-15</crs:ParametricLights>
             <crs:ParametricHighlights>+14</crs:ParametricHighlights>
             <crs:ParametricShadowSplit>25</crs:ParametricShadowSplit>
             <crs:ParametricMidtoneSplit>50</crs:ParametricMidtoneSplit>
             <crs:ParametricHighlightSplit>75</crs:ParametricHighlightSplit>
             <crs:SharpenRadius>+1.0</crs:SharpenRadius>
             <crs:SharpenDetail>25</crs:SharpenDetail>
             <crs:SharpenEdgeMasking>0</crs:SharpenEdgeMasking>
             <crs:PostCropVignetteAmount>-24</crs:PostCropVignetteAmount>
             <crs:PostCropVignetteMidpoint>50</crs:PostCropVignetteMidpoint>
             <crs:PostCropVignetteFeather>97</crs:PostCropVignetteFeather>
             <crs:PostCropVignetteRoundness>0</crs:PostCropVignetteRoundness>
             <crs:PostCropVignetteStyle>1</crs:PostCropVignetteStyle>
             <crs:PostCropVignetteHighlightContrast>0</crs:PostCropVignetteHighlightContrast>
             <crs:GrainAmount>0</crs:GrainAmount>
             <crs:ColorNoiseReductionDetail>50</crs:ColorNoiseReductionDetail>
             <crs:ConvertToGrayscale>False</crs:ConvertToGrayscale>
             <crs:ToneCurveName>Medium Contrast</crs:ToneCurveName>
             <crs:CameraProfile>Adobe Standard</crs:CameraProfile>
             <crs:CameraProfileDigest>51B4314CF8312BA027EF3FC60481FB35</crs:CameraProfileDigest>
             <crs:HasSettings>True</crs:HasSettings>
    To fix the problem you're gonna need to reset your camera raw defaults:
    And then be careful when saving new camera raw defaults with the menu item just above, that your image has the camera raw defaults applied to it, except whatever small change you want to be the new default.

  • White Balance tool and Camera Calibration Profiles

    Downloaded Lightroom v4 Beta 1 for mac but the installer package failed to launch. (com.apple.installer.pagecontroller error -1.) So I've only watched the adobe tv presentations todate.
    Anyway just wanted to give some feedback as a pro photographer about use of Lightroom and improvments I would like to see in the next version.
    I am a commercial photographer who needs colour accuracy in photographing fashion/garment images - most of my work is reproduced on a printing press for catalogues and brochures. On average a shoot will yeild about 500 images for a client, so workflow is important as they normally want them all!
    As a previous user of Capture One Pro v6 and now lightroom v3.6 - the biggest issue I have with Lightroom is the dominace of red tint when setting the white balance from a gray card reference image, shot at the same time as the images to be processed. I'm not adding anything to the images other than doing a white balance, a tweak on exposure and camera neutral setting on profiles.
    To obtain a white balance setting I use the combination of an  Xrite white balance card and the Q-Card and the old fasioned Kodak Gray cards all mounted on the same surface. I've used spot and ambient light readings on the gray cards to measure exposure and I've used the Adobe DNG Profiler and the Xrite colour checker profiler with the large colour checker card as a reference, (I've made profiles for sunny days, cloudy days, dual illuminant etc etc) and I'm viewing my images on a colour calibrated apple monitor.
    Not withstanding all of the above the best results I get out of Lightroom are using the camera profile neutral setting! Everthing else is just too red!! even though the images do look more punchy; for accuracy of actual colour I choose the camera neutral profile.
    Well when I say best results, those for colour critical garment photography and skin tones, these results are similar to those obtained from capture one pro v6.
    So for the Lightroom v4 I would like to see.
    1. White balance RGB values in numbers rather than percentages.
    2. Add and delete a colour readouts points with a dropper tool on an image to enable more acurate colour balancing particularly in shadow areas - (already available on capture one pro and adobe photoshop)
    3. Curves adjustments in all RGB channels (think you've done this)
    4. Output to CMYK profiles.
    5. Individual levels channel adjustment for RGB
    6. Ability re-organize my tools palette (add and remove) is per Capture One and Photoshop
    Regards

    The legacy ACR X.x profiles are no more produced nor included for newer cameras (AFAIK, since ACR 5.1/LR 2.1). The Adobe Standard is the new default starting point for these.
    While I am at it....are the Canon camera profiles I downloaded for the 1Ds MKII the same as for the 5D MKII or do I have to download different one...I suspect they are the same or Lightroom wouldn't offer them to me...is that correct?
    The profiles are different for each camera model, even if they share the same name in the Calibration panel. If you can see them when developing 5DII files, it means the camera-specific profiles are installed for your particular camera model (otherwise, you wouldn't see them).

  • Can Bridge report in-camera settings for White Balance?

    No matter what settings I choose in Bridge Preferences, I cannot get it to tell me what was the White Balance (WB) setting of the camera when raw images were shot.
    This seems an odd omission because Camera Raw is passed this information and displays images correctly, although it doesn't report what WB value it was given, only that what you are viewing, prior to any editing, is the default "As Shot".
    I'm referring to raw files shot on my Canon 300D, Nikon D700 and Canon 5D Mark II.
    Currently I'm using PsCS6 (13.0.1.2 x64), Bridge CS6 (5.0.2.4 x64) and ACR 8.1 on a Windows 7 x64 8GB system, but the same omission existed on the same Windows system with ACR 7.x in CS6 and all releases of PsCS5, Bridge CS5 and ACR 6.6 and 6.7.
    On the opening dialog of Bridge Preferences, at the bottom you can choose whether or not you wish to 'Hide Empty Fields'. Selecting or unselecting this option does not have any effect upon Bridge's inability to report WB when, from within Bridge, you select File Info from the File menu or by hitting Ctrl + I.
    The only locations in Bridge Preferences I can find that need selection (and which I have selected) for Bridge to supply WB information upon invoking File Info are here:
    Preferences\Metadata\Camera Data (Exif)\White Balance; and
    Preferences\Metadata\Camera Raw\White Balance
    I have also selected Preferences\Metadata\File Properties\Supports XMP, and yet Bridge fails to give the in-camera WB in the Camera Data tab of File Info.
    I have been able to locate references to WB in the following tabs of File Info:
    File Info\Advanced, where there appears, under the sub-tab 'Exif Properties (http://ns.adobe.com/exif/1.0)', an entry such as 'exif:White Balance:1'; and
    File Info\Raw Data an entry such as '<exif:White Balance >1< /exif:White Balance>'.
    However, these are just code numbers, not names like 'Cloudy' or 'Shade', and they are not only inconsistent (both showing the code 1 for an unedited image I know was shot with Auto WB and another unedited image I know was shot with Flash WB) but also it would appear that the codes may refer to the WB as modified by ACR - because an image I know had its in-camera WB of Auto altered in ACR shows a code of 'Custom' rather than 0, 1 or some other number.
    So what am I missing? Does anyone know how to make Bridge Preferences display the in-camera setting for WB, and if so, under which tab of File Info do you look for the answer once you have set up Preferences properly?
    Message was edited by: Andrew_Hart
    Just corrected my current Photoshop version

    I'm afraid that you just haven't addressed the question that I asked in my original post.
    I still like to think I have but if you for whatever reason need this info showing in the metadata you probably be better of trying to alter it your self or find a way to address Paul personally (maybe via a private message).
    I have not heard from him for a long time and a small google search provided me with this forum post, hope it helps you, maybe you can also persuaded Paul to come back, he is very missed!
    http://www.ps-scripts.com/bb/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=5508

  • Camera Raw crashes with use of white balance eye dropper.

    Using PS CC2014.2.1
    Since this update, whenever I use the white balance eyedropper in Camera Raw, if placed over an over exposed region, instead of the dialogue box popping up to warn that the area is too bright, the system just freezes. Have to launch task manager and close PS.
    If eyedropper is placed on non-over exposed (not clipped) area, it seems alright. Anyone else experiencing this?

    Due to the current unavailability of clairvoyants and mind-readers in the forum, we respectfully request you supply sensible, complete details.
    BOILERPLATE TEXT:
    Note that this is boilerplate text.
    If you give complete and detailed information about your setup and the issue at hand,
    such as your platform (Mac or Win),
    exact versions of your OS, of Photoshop (not just "CS6", but something like CS6v.13.0.6) and of Bridge,
    your settings in Photoshop > Preference > Performance
    the type of file you were working on,
    machine specs, such as total installed RAM, scratch file HDs, total available HD space, video card specs, including total VRAM installed,
    what troubleshooting steps you have taken so far,
    what error message(s) you receive,
    if having issues opening raw files also the exact camera make and model that generated them,
    if you're having printing issues, indicate the exact make and model of your printer, paper size, image dimensions in pixels (so many pixels wide by so many pixels high). if going through a RIP, specify that too.
    etc.,
    someone may be able to help you (not necessarily this poster, who is not a Windows user).
    a screen shot of your settings or of the image could be very helpful too.
    Please read this FAQ for advice on how to ask your questions correctly for quicker and better answers:
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/419981?tstart=0
    Thanks!

  • Bug report: Wrong As Shot White Balance for Nikon D50 NEF in Camera Raw 7, Lightroom 4

    For Nikon D50 cameras Adobe Creative Suite 6 does not read "As Shot" white balance data whether it's specified or not. It defaults to "Automatic". We have the problem only for Nikon D50 and only in Photoshop CS6, Adobe Camera Raw 7.3 and Photoshop Lightroom 4. (Not in CS5. Not for Nikon D5100 or D7000 or Canon S95) .
    There is a more detailed posting at photoshop.com.
    Lightroom 4.2 / ACR 7.2: WB "as shot" does not read the WB of Nikon D50 NEF, defaults to "automatic"
    http://phtshp.us/10utPuk
    phtshp.us/10utPuk

    Moving the discussion to PS Forums

  • Z1 camera vs z camera, lacks white balance

    i have compared the camera shots yesterday. why is the camera of z produces better shots? z1's camera shot samples are so grainy and noisy. im disappoinyed because im planning to buy z1 soon. and it also lacks white balance on display which imprives the over all display quality of the device.
    SONY PLEASE DO SOMETHING!!!
    IM DISAPPOINTED, I WANT TO BUY Z1,
    BUT IT NEEDS MORE IMPROVEMENT.
    I HOPE MY CONCERN REACHES YOU.
    THANKS A LOT.

    It does
    http://userguide.sonymobile.com/referrer.php?region=global-en&product=xperia-z1#General-camera-setti...
    White balance
    This function adjusts the colour balance according to the lighting conditions. The white balance setting icon  is available on the camera screen.
    Auto
    Adjusts the colour balance automatically to suit the lighting conditions.
    Incandescent
    Adjusts the colour balance for warm lighting conditions, such as under light bulbs.
    Fluorescent
    Adjusts the colour balance for fluorescent lighting.
    Daylight
    Adjusts the colour balance for sunny outdoor conditions.
    Cloudy
    Adjusts the colour balance for a cloudy sky.
    This setting is only available in Manual capturing mode.
    "I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not." Kurt Cobain (1967-1994)

Maybe you are looking for