IPad photos sort by size, largest disk size to smallest?

iPad photos sort by size, largest disk size to smallest?

PS. I searched for exact phrase "sort iPad photos by size" on Google and I am aghast that there were ZERO RESULTS.
https://www.google.com/search?site=webhp&ei=yEsuU9nNGYzkoASmmILoBQ&q=%22sort+iPa d+photos+by+size%22&oq=%22sort+iPad+photos+by+size%22&gs_l=mobile-gws-serp.3..0i 22i30.19488.31073.0.31755.19.19.0.0.0.2.350.3389.0j15j3j1.19.0....0...1c.1.37.mo bile-gws-serp..2.17.2771.LsiZBTPRvQk

Similar Messages

IPhone and iPad photos - Sort by date taken

If your photos are not sorted by the date the photos were taken, here's how to troubleshoot and resolve the problem.
I encountered the problem when syncing my photo library from my computer to my iPhone and iPad. Almost all the photos were sorted properly by the date they were taken except for photos taken with a Nikon D70S SLR Camera. The photos from the Nikon D70S were being sorted using the date the sync was performed (not the file creation date nor the EXIF data date). This caused my photo album to not have all the photos in a nice chronological order.
First I checked to ensure the photos output from the Nikon D70S contained the EXIF "date taken" data and they did indeed have the proper date in the EXIF data. Next I checked to see if the EXIF version number was in each file and it was. I then noticed the EXIF version number output by the Nikon D70S was formatted differently than the other sources (e.g. differently than other Nikon cameras, other iPhones, etc).
I then viewed the EXIF data for the Nikon D70S photos in the Adobe Photoshop organizer and found the EXIF version number was missing. It was clearly in the Nikon original files (I use RAW format when taking photos with the Nikon D70S). This led me to suspect Adobe Photoshop Elements was not exporting the data in a form Apple iTunes could read when I was converting the Nikon .NEF files (RAW format) to .JPG files (needed for Apple iTunes and the iPhone and Ipad products). Most likely iTunes needs both the EXIF date taken and EXIF version number when syncing photos into iTunes, if the EXIF version number is missing, it uses the date the sync was performed as the date when sorting the photo file in the iPhone and iPad photo viewer.
I then used Adobe Creative Suite / Adobe Bridge (at our office, it's used for graphic arts work along with regular Photoshop, Illustrator, In-Design, etc.) to export the files from Nikon .NEF RAW format to .JPG format and found it output the EXIF data including the EXIF date taken date and EXIF version in a form readable by iTunes.
By using Adobe Creative Suite / Adobe Bridge instead of Adobe Photoshop Elements Organizer to convert the Nikon D70S .NEF files to .JPG format (for subsequent import into the iPhone and iPad via iTunes), the process worked properly and the photos are sorted by date taken properly.

Maybe this will help
iOS: Understanding photo sorting

Folder Size Exceed Disk Size

I am using Western Digital 2TB external HDD for Time Machine backup for 3 Mac. The remaining disk space now is 733GB. I am confused that one of the backup folder occupy more than 2TB. And the other 2 folders are still calculating since I started about 6 hours ago.
My 2 questions are:
1) Why the folder size is 3.13TB which is more than the physical size of the harddisk
2) Why it is taking such a long time to compute the disk space for the other two folder

Hi,
Actually, it may be a display error, anyway I would record this issue.
Although, I would give you some short description about this issue.
Files would have two properties about size:
Size: is the actual size of the file in bytes.
Size on disk: is the actual amount of space being take up on the disk.
I believe Windows Explorer is invoking GetCompressedFileSize function to retrieves the actual number of bytes of disk storage used to store a specified file. If the file is located on a volume that supports compression and the file is
compressed, the value obtained is the compressed size of the specified file.
We can see everything works well in Windows 8 and previous versions. To prove this is a misread issue, let’s use GetCompressedFileSize function to see if we can retrieve the right value of compressed file size.
Here is the first picture in Windows 8:
The second is in Windows 8.1, but we use PowerShell script to retrieve the right value:
About the whole process, you can refer to this article:
Get the size of a file on disk
http://www.powershellmagazine.com/2013/10/31/pstip-get-the-size-of-a-file-on-disk/
GetCompressedFileSize function
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa364930(v=vs.85).aspx
So, I think it just don't read the compressed file size successfully, so it use the "Size" value directly to calculate the Size on disk.
Hope this could make it clear.
Alex Zhao
TechNet Community Support

IPad photo sort order issue is ridiculous. Why is this not fixed?

Apple,
Sometimes you might want to come down from the mountain and just fix the most obvious and insanely frustrating issues with your software. The one that rises to the top at the moment is when images are imported to iPad from folders (not iPhoto) they are not sort by name. Whose universe are you in that thinks this is helpful to anyone not using iPhoto and why did the 4.2 update not fix this issue. The iPad is made to present photos in the most amazing way. One of the top three uses for the device. Third party apps for photo presentation/portfolio are a sorry lot of problems and forcing them to import one image at a time is brutal.
This may also be a good time to rant about changing the orientation switch on the side of the iPad. That was one thing that just worked now it doesn't. You now need to take 5 steps to stop the orientation from changing. Again in what universe is this a good idea?
Thanks for all the incredible things you make but please take a minute and fix the simple stuff.

Apple does not really read these forums. If you want to make a suggestion to Apple go here:
http://www.apple.com/feedback/ipad.html

How the Performance data depends on Number of CPU/ RAM size/ Hard Disk size

Hi,
I have started Performance testing (web test and Load tests) using VSTS 2012. I was analysing the VSTS results summary page.
I could not find a way by which we can find a co-relation between the Performance Result data Impacted by Server's Configuration such as
1- # of CPUs /Cores
2- RAM size
3- Hard Disk capacity
Could you help me out if we can reach to a point, through which we can say that, For eg - the Server Performance can be improved if we increase any of the dependent hardware configuration and Also, How the Hardware configuration impacts the Performance.
Thanks.
Thanks, Anoop Singh

The results show the performance with the hardware and software configuration
when the test is run. The results may show that some parts of the configuration are lightly loaded (and hence have plenty of spare capacity) whereas other parts are heavily loaded (and hence may be limiting the system performance).
To see the effect of changing the hardware or software configuration would need running exactly the same test with that changed configuration. Then the results of the two (or more) different runs can be compared. Microsoft has some details on how
to compare load test results. See
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd728091(v=vs.120).aspx
Regards
Adrian

Ipad Photos sort order

I'm posting this entry to add my voice to the group of iPad users who have reported a defect in the order that the iPad displays photos, in the hope that Apple iOS and iTunes development will soon provide a fix for this defect. The following is a description of my encounter with this defect, using a new iPad (3) with iOS 6.0 and iTunes 10.7.0.21.
I have a set of 1000 photos on my Windows 7 64-bit PC. I re-arranged the photos in an order different from the order that they were taken with the digital camera. I did a mass rename of the photo files so that the first file in this re-arrangement is named P0001, the second file is named P0002, etc. I used iTunes on the PC to import the phptos into the iPad. I checked the order of these photos displayed on the iPad and it matched the order P0001, P0002, etc. I disconnected the iPad and exited from iTunes. Later I reconnected the iPad and started iTunes. I checked the order of these photos displayed on the iPad and it DID NOT match the order P0001, P0002, etc. I found that it matched the order in which the photos were taken.
I consider this a defect because the order of displaying the photos is not consistent from the first time to the second time. I would like the iPad to always display photos in the order of the ascending sequence of the photo file names.

When you say that you've followed instructions in other posts, have you tried deleting the photo cache from your computer and then re-try the photo sync and see if they then copy over in the correct order ? The location of the cache, and how to delete it, is on this page http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1314

How can I find the largest files on my hard drive (sorted in descending order of size)?

To make most efficient use of Time Machine backup, I would like to have the option to exclude certain larger files that I don't need to save in case of a disk crash (e.g. a Windows partition under Parallels Desktop, which is backed up at the office anyway) etc.
I can't figure out how I can scan my entire hard drive and obtain a list of all files in descending order of size, irrespective of within which subdirectories such files are hidden. Anyone having an idea on how this simple task can be accomplished?
Thanks,
AnLe41

While Finder is active, press Command-F (Find in the File menu).
In that window you can set search criteria. In the second sub-toolbar should be a couple of buttons representing pulldown menus; by default, the first usually shows "kind". Click that one.
In the menu that opens, if "Size" or "File Size" is not available, select "Other". Then in the new window select "Size" or "File Size" and okay the window. From then on that choice will be available in the first pulldown menu.
You can use that to search your drive.
Note - by clicking the "+" button at the far right of the strip containing the pulldown menus, you can add additional search criteria, thus restricting a search to exactly what you want.

Help, how do I get iPad Photos to sort the way I want?

I'm at wits end!
After a week of constant sync/re-sync/re-name-stripping out all EXIF data, I'm still at the mercy of some random sort order for some of my photos.
I have read: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4221 - which seems to indicate that it reads the EXIF data first. I have stripped all EXIF data from all my photos in hopes that it will resort to alphabetical order of the file-names. But it doesn't seem to do so - it seems to still rely on last modified date of the file itself. Short of copying individually hundreds of photos over in the order that I want - I don't know what to do. Additionally, through trial and error, it seems that it doesn't recognize differences in timestamp in the seconds, only minutes - ARGH!! Is anyone else having such a hard time to get the iPad to sort the photos by filename in an order that I specify?
I am not on Mac and cannot use iPhoto to sort, so I am on the PC side and order my photos using ACDSee and batch rename them so that they are alphabetically correct.
Please, its essential that they are grouped in my order, but I can't for the last week coax my iPad to display in alphabetical filename order (it seems simple enough?!) I'm so frustrated!!
Please help.

I do not understand what you mean by a problem with downsizing large image, the images I have dragged over are exactly the same size as on my home computer, I can see it may cause the IPad problems if you are trying to transfer 50 mb tiff files or something similar, it really is not designed for that type of image.
My workflow is as follows, I work up my raw files and save a copy as a tiff for printed output, for web or iPad use I make an approx 2 Mb jpeg file.
I make a folder with an appropriate title, insert the required images, the images are sorted either by the original camera file numbering or if I want items in a particular order I will start a number 1 and continue, Airsharing will respect your ordering sequence, so number 1 will always be number 1.
As a viewer Air Sharing in my opinion is better than the photo app because it leaves your images in the order you have set, to view an image you open the folder click on number 1 or whatever is your 1st image, that
opens full screen, you have the choice of moving through the folder singly by clicking the arrow head at the bottom right/left of the screen or a slide show by clicking the centre arrow head, you set the time on screen etc.
If you put the same selection of images on the iPad via the Photo app it would number your images in a way you have little control over and will even optimise your image even if you do not want it to !
The Airsharing library is seperate from the photo library, you can move images to the photo library but why would you want to do that ? All your image sorting is done on your computer prior to the transfer, surely you do not want an app making decisions on you behalf ?
To me it is a perfect portfolio app because I make all the decisions about file size, sequence of images how I want to display them, singly or as a slideshow I am in control not Apple.

Disk Utility: Reporting wrong size for disk after a restore

First up, hardware is G4(PPC) running OS 10.4.11
I've just purchased and installed a new 500G drive for this old workhorse as an upgrade for the previous secondary drive. Set it up with a single partition, JHFS+. No problems so far. Went to copy the files from the old drive to this new one and thought, "Why don't I try that handly looking Restore button?". +Yeah, apparently a bad idea+. The old drive is 120GB. I set its (only) volume to be the source and my newly created partition to be the target; set it going and left it alone. All appeared to be well when I came back, until I checked the available space on the new drive.
Disk Utility now reports that this new, 500G drive has a Total Capacity of 128G (137,438,952,960 bytes).
*Remedies tried so far:*
- I've tried reformatting/partitioning, but wasn't able to convince it otherwise. Also tried it booting from an install DVD just in case that made a difference.
- I downloaded a utility from the drive manufacturer which I managed to get on to an ancient, dusty w2k box. Reformatted the drive with 2 NTFS partitions. This seemed to do the trick as they both mounted when I rebooted the Mac. However, when I went to reformat the volumes to JHFS I noticed that the total disk size was still being reported as 128G. Still, they reformatted fine and I transfered my data to them. On a reboot, though, the Mac decided that it didn't want to see the second partition and only shows me disk1s10, ignoring the second partition I set up.
- I have an identical, empty drive to the 500G. I thought I might be able to use the Restore "feature" to trick it back. Set up the second 500G in a firewire box, ran the restore from the empty volume to the screwed up one. No dice.
I thought that OS X ignored any sort of BIOS info on a drive and merely looked at the physical media. Is this correct? Does it store this gathered info in a file somewhere that I can delete?
*This is a call for help.*
I have no problems playing with the command line as root, if that's the sort of suggestions you've got. I just thought I'd ask here before I fdisk/dd etc from new500 to old500. Geometry of the new500 is 60801/255/63.

Thanks! That sounds like a good short term solution for a backup.
EDIT: Cross reference link for anyone who happens to google this thread with a similar problem:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=7230072&tstart=0
Message was edited by: mr_lunch

Disk Size Increasing very Fast

I am facing very critical issue, disk size, where E2k13 is installed reducing its free space daily near 1 GB and on other hand database file is not taking too much size over the Disk. please suggest me some good option to sort it .
BRAT

Hi,
Based on my knowledge, circular logging is not recommended in a normal Exchange production environment. Also, enabling circular logging is not a long-term option.
I recommend you disable it and do a full backup to solve your issue.
For more information, here is a thread for your reference.
enable circular logging (Note: Though it is Exchange 2010, I think it also applies to Exchange 2013 about this issue)
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/a01579af-8cdc-40d3-aef4-b5f569833553/enable-circular-logging?forum=exchange2010
Hope it helps.
Best regards,
Amy
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support

WMV and Disk Size issues

So I am a pretty avid Encore user and I have come into some issues lately and could use some help.
Background-
I filmed a 14 hour conference on SD 16:9 mini dv
I captured 14 hours with Premiere as .AVI - I edited the segments and exported as .AVI
I used Media Encoder to convert the files to NTSC Progressive Widescreen High Quality (.m2v) - Reduced the file size drastically
I then used Media Encoder to convert the .m2v files to .wmv files - Reducing the conference size to 5.65 GB in total.
I then imported the .wmv into Encore - my issues begin
At first, Encore CS4 imported the .wmv files without a problem however the disk size (of 5.65 GB) registered in Encore as around 13 gigs??? Why is that? The .wmv files only consume 5.65 gb on my harddrive. Where is this file size issues coming from?
So then Encore CS4 gets upset that I have exceeded the 8.5 DL Disk size and crashes...
I reopen the program and try to import my .wmv files again (forgot to save like an idiot). 3 of 8 .wmv files import and then Encore starts giving me decoder errors saying I cannot import the rest of the .wmv files...
Can anyone help me with this issue? Im quite confused by all of this. Things seemed to work fine (sorta) at first and now Encore is pissed.
I want to get this 14 hour conference on 1 DL DVD and I thought it would be as simple as getting the files reduced to a size sutable for a 8.5 gb disk. Why is my way of thinking incorrect?
Thanks for any help,
Sam

ssavery wrote:
Thanks everyone for your help.
Im still not giving up.... It's become an obsession at this point. My uncle does this with kids movies for his children. He'll download and compress entire seasons of children shows and put them all on one dvd which he then plays in a dvd player for them to watch. Im currently trying to get ahold of him....
Thanks for the help
Sam
i've done this as well for shows that are never to be seen again for the light of day from the 80s and such... i use VSO Software's "ConvertXtoDVD v4" i ONLY use this for archival purposes of xvid or wmv or stuff that encore would throw fits over. the menus are all mainly default stock stuff. but for these projects i'm not concerned about menus or specific navigation, i just need to get the job done. i can squeeze around 15 hrs of 720x480 on one DL (it compresses the ever living dayligths out of the video... but for most of the source footage... it really doesnt matter at that point, its mostly all VHS archives i use for this program anyway) if you just absolutely HAVE to have a 1 disker, you could check that app out, burn it an see how it looks.
edited to add: that to really squeeze crap in, you can also use a DVDFab program (any ersion should do... Older ones are cheaper) make a disc image with ConvertX, if yiu have alot f footage it may push it beyond the normal boundary of a dvd-dl and fail the burn. So then you can just import the disc image into DVDFab, and choose it to burn to a DVD-DL, and it may compress it by about 3-7% more to fit it. I would NEVER use this method EVER for a client... But if you are just hell-bent on doing 1 disk. Tries these 2 apps out. It may work out if you can live with the compression.
if you do try this, I recommend trying this workflow. Open premiere with your first gem captured AVI. set up your chapters how you want them or whatever, then save each chapter or lecture or segment or whatever as it's own AVI. the. Import all those separately into ConvertX and set it up to play one after the other when each segment ends. [i can't confirm this 100%, because i usually drop in already compressed files... but if for some reason it don't wanna work out... then i would suggest dropping in the mts files instead] (if say you want a new "movie" for each lecture instead, and have chapters per movie that can be done too... But it's more work, but I can expound later if need be) To save time on encoding, set up the menu to be the "minimalist" menu. It's strictly text. Then just create sn ISO. if you donthe full thing, I can almost guarantee you'll have to use DVDFab to burn to disc, because it'll probably be about 5-8% overburn.

Disk size in Solaris 10

I have some confusion about disk subsystem in Solaris, i am trying to clarify from this forum.
I have recently installed Solaris 10 in one SPARC box. After i installed, the format gives the bellow output.
0 root wm 19491 - 29648 4.88GB (10158/0/0) 10239264
1 swap wu 0 - 4062 1.95GB (4063/0/0) 4095504
2 backup wm 0 - 29648 14.25GB (29649/0/0) 29886192
From the above output, is the size of my disk is 14 GB ?, or the size of my disk is 14+2+5=21 GB ?
I am trying to learn ZFS, so i want another partition in this disk so that i create ZFS on that partition.
I have gone to single user mode by using CD. I assumed that, from the above "format" command output, i thought i have 21GB of disk size and 14GB of free space. So i created another partition with 14GB. Now the format command gives bellow output.
0 root wm 19491 - 29648 4.88GB (10158/0/0) 10239264
1 swap wu 0 - 4062 1.95GB (4063/0/0) 4095504
2 backup wm 0 - 29648 14.25GB (29649/0/0) 29886192
3 reserved wm 0 - 29127 14.00GB (29128/0/0) 29361024
When i am creating ZFS, it given me a warning that the the partition i have specified is spanned into root partition (first partition), and it mentioned to use "-f" option.
With "-f", it created successfully.
If i assume now that the size of my disk is 14GB only then,
(1) how come two partitions are pointing to the same area in the disk ?
(2) How come two different filesystems are pointing to the same area ?
Please anyone clarify my doubts. Thank you.

Assuming a standard labeled disk it is standrad practice to have section/slice 2 being 'whole disk' for purposes of 'backup'. That would tend to indicate you have a 14GB disk. A prtvtoc /dev/dsk/c?t?d?s2 (change the ?s to the right values) will give a little more on the disk geometry.
In the display from format column 4 is the start cylinder of the partition and column 5 is the end cylinder. From the first set out output it looks like cyclinders 4063 to 19490 are not allocated
In the second set you have created a new slice (section 3) that overlaps both sections 0 and 1 - which is generally considered to be bad!

MS 6147 max memory and disk sizes

For the MS 6147 can anybody confirm the max Hard disk size and max memory.
It will not recognise the 40Gb HD I am trying to fit, and only recognises half of the 256Mb memeory simm I have fitted.
The BIOS version is 1.9 but I think that is a 'special' by Packard Bell. The MSI BIOS download site makes no mention of disk problems rectified right up to V1.8 which is the latest, with the exception of one for the ZX chipset only which addresses EDMA 66 problem.
Anybody got a definitive answer on this?

Supports a maximum memory size of 256MB (8M x 8) or
512MB (16M x 4) registered DIMM only
how many chips on dimm is what counts with older boards
go to drive makers web site get jumper settings to limit it to 32gb and try

Is there a max SATA disk size in OSX 10.4.11 and G4/1.25?

Hello,
I am trying to set up a G4/1.25 (2 gig in memory) as a fileserver with a SATA card and 2 x 3 TB seagate disks. This is the setup:
http://lowendmac.com/ppc/mdd-power-mac-g4-1.25-ghz.html
http://firmtek.com/seritek/seritek-1v4/
http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Seagate/ST3000DM001/
The system is OSX 10.4.11. I am unable to initialize the disks in disk utility. The process starts but then halts and says that it can not continue.
My question is if there is a max disk size in OSX 10.4.11?
Any help greatly appriceated.
Best regards,
Ingolfur Bruun

Hello again,
I tried to work my way around armed with your input and succeeded
By using a FireWire dock I was able to see the disks in 10.4.11. What I did was to partition the disks with ONE partition in Disk Utility and then format with GUID partitioning scheme instead of the Apple Partition Mapping scheme which I had done before. And as I am using a ATA disk as a startup disk it dosen't matter if the 3 TB disks are not bootable. They will only be used for data, not as system disks.
You saved my day! Thanks again.
Best regards,
Ingolfur

How do I find out the file size of my photos, and change them to the size

This will sound inane, but I cannot figure out where to find the file size of my photos in iPhoto. I need a jpeg of a certain file size and image size for my blog background, but can't figure out how to even start.

If the limited quality options do not get you the file size you need export the full size image files to a folder on your Desktop and use Resize! to batch resize the image dimensions and file size (jpeg compression level) to what you need.
Click to view full size
With Resize! you can fine tune the pixel dimensions and file size.
OT

IPad photos sort by size, largest disk size to smallest?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for