Iphone 4s box weight and dimensions

Hi guys,
Can anyone please help me by asnwering the following qs
What is the total weight of iphone 4s box(including iphone and all accesories) and dimensions of box as well.
I need to know as i have to ship the phone oversease.
Thank you

Hi i have the wieght for u which is .409 kg

Similar Messages

What is the PACKAGING (box it comes in) weight and dimensions for the 3rd generation Apple TV?

Hi
What is the PACKAGING (box it comes in) weight and dimensions for the 3rd generation Apple TV?
Thanks
CTV

The clear thing is a stand. The white thing is the dock adapter.
The stand can be seen in use here:
http://www.silvermac.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/ipod_touch.jpg

Update new material master weight and dimension in open sales orders and de

Hi,
Iu2019m maintaining gross weight, net weight, volume in material master. When the time of sales order entry in VA01 its calculating weight and dimensions based on material master and order quantity. And I create deliveries in VL01N.
If I made a correction in the net and gross weight in material master after I created the sales order will the correct net and gross weight will pick up at the delivery creation.
In other term is the VL01N net and gross weight is taking from which is available in SO or Material master.
Is there any standard transaction to update already existing open sales order, delivery net and gross weight once it is corrected in material master?
Please advice.
Sam

Is there any standard transaction to update
No it is not possible to update the weight in existing sale order or delivery. You have to change it manually or create a new sale order. Weight in delivery will be fetched from sale order only and hence, whatever delivery you create referencing a sale order, system will copy whatever is there.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Need to find the weight and dimensions of RSP and Power Module of ASR 9922

Need to find the weight and dimensions of RSP and Power Module of ASR 9922. I am unable to find the same in the data sheet. Please help
Regards
Thanveer
"Everybody is genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is a stupid."

duplicate post
https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/4143520#4143520
Riv

What is the total weight and dimentions of a Mac Pro with retina 13"? Including any extra delivery packaging (i.e box, bubble rap, etc)? Thx

What is the total weight and dimentions of a Mac Pro with retina 13" including any extra delivery packaging (i.e box, bubble rap, etc)? Thx

What is the total weight and dimentions of a Mac Pro with retina 13" including any extra delivery packaging (i.e box, bubble rap, etc)? Thx

When importing photos from my iPhone black boxes appear in place of random photos in the library and in Photostream.

When importing photos from my iPhone black boxes appear in place of random photos in the iPhoto library and in Photostream. It has no apparent pattern, the photos are just blank. It's not just icons, when I go to edit the photos externally in Photoshop it opens an image filled with nothing but black.
This is more than annoying. It's effectively deleting photos I'm taking on vacation and so forth.
Anyone?

The ! turns up when iPhoto loses the connection between the thumbnail in the iPhoto Window and the file it represents.
Option 1
Back Up and try rebuild the library: hold down the command and option (or alt) keys while launching iPhoto. Use the resulting dialogue to rebuild. Choose to Repair Database. If that doesn't help, then try again, this time using Rebuild Database.
If that fails:
Option 2
Download iPhoto Library Manager and use its rebuild function. (In Library Manager it's the FIle -> Rebuild command)
This will create an entirely new library. It will then copy (or try to) your photos and all the associated metadata and versions to this new Library, and arrange it as close as it can to what you had in the damaged Library. It does this based on information it finds in the iPhoto sharing mechanism - but that means that things not shared won't be there, so no slideshows, books or calendars, for instance - but it should get all your events, albums and keywords, faces and places back.
Because this process creates an entirely new library and leaves your old one untouched, it is non-destructive, and if you're not happy with the results you can simply return to your old one.
Regards
TD

HT1848 When trying to transfer my purchases on my phone to my computer, I went to file devices transfer purchases, and said I have done so. But if I try to update my iphone a box pops up and says I should still transfer my purchased items first. But I alr

When trying to transfer my purchases on my phone to my computer, I went to file>devices>transfer purchases, and said I have done so. But if I try to update my iphone a box pops up and says I should still transfer my purchased items first. But I already have, am I doing something wrong?

No, just a reminder that you should do so beforehand, which you have already done.

On my iPhone 4, I cannot get the "not enough storage on iCloud" message to close. Therefore, I can't get past this box/screen AND I can't turn the device off. Please help.

On my iPhone 4, I cannot get the "not enough storage on iCloud" message to close. Therefore, I can't get past this box/screen AND I can't turn the device off. Please help.

Try resetting it by holding the power and home buttons at the same time until you see the Apple logo, then releasing. You won't lose any data by doing this.

I have moved the photos of my iPhone 4s to my and now I want them back. What do I do?

I have moved the photos of my iPhone 4s to my and now I want them back. What do I do?
Help me very urgent !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Go into iTunes, select the name of your iphone on the list on the left hand side of iTunes, looks right above the picture of your iphone and you'll see summary info apps etc. go all the way to the right and you'll see photos, check mark the box to sync photos and chose the folder where you imported the photos to your computer from.

I have lost all my notes saved on my iphone after syncing it. and my default mailbox is gmail. notes were very important. and now i dont know how to get them back. can anyone help me out please? thanks in advance.

i have lost all my notes saved on my iphone after syncing it. and my default mailbox is gmail. notes were very important. and now i dont know how to get them back. can anyone help me out please? thanks in advance.

Try this ..
On your Mac open System Preferences > iCloud
Deselect the box next to: Notes
Then reselect it.
Give iCloud a few minutes to re sync the data.
Other than that, try Time Machine > http://pondini.org/TM/15m.html

Expert help needed to connect iPhone / iPad using BlueTooth and Wi-Fi

We need expert help to connect iPhone / iPad using BlueTooth and Wi-Fi. If you have worked with Apple MFi Program [http://developer.apple.com/programs/mfi], or have expertise/experience in this, please contact me. Thanks! Kevin.

Hi there.
I connected to my livebox after about three attempts. You have to pair the livebox by pressing either the number one or two that is on the box. When it is in pair mode it stays that way for ten minutes so it gives you chance to try your wep code that is on the bottom of the box a few times. I can't remember which one was successful but i did try the letters in uppercase and lower and one of them seemed to connect.
Welcome to discussions by the way.
Hope this helps JB

Unable to see planning application and dimension menus under navigate tab

Dears
Unable to see planning application and dimension menus under navigate tab in EPM 11.1.1.1 workspace.
Is there any configuration lost?
All EPM service have already started.
Thx
Hector

I also don't see the menu under "Consolidation" or "Planning" applications. I can naviaget to these applications from Navigate -> Application ->Consolidation or Planning and I see a box with up arrow and down arrow. If I keep my cursor between these two boxes, or the boundary, sometime I could start my applications in these two modules. I checked context.properties in \Hyperion\home\deployment\Tomcat5\workspace\webapps\workspace\conf folder.
#Appended properties
#Sat Jan 17 14:14:43 EST 2009
Reports=Y
HFM=Y
HPSU=Y
HP=Y
HPS=Y
Analyzer=Y
BPMA=Y
ChangeManagement=Y
Subcontext.properties file is as follows:
Analyzer=WebAnalysis
Reports=hr
HMB=metrics
HPS=HPSWebReports
HFM=hfm
HP=HyperionPlanning
BPMA=awb
HFM-version=9.3.1
HP-version=9.3.1
HPS-version=9.3.1
HMB-version=9.3.1
BPMA-version=9.3.1
# Parameters for all contexts
#KeepAliveInterval=10
#SessionTimeout=30
#logon=bpm.logon
#startup=cds.mode
I also removed # character in the last four lines but I cannot see my aplications under "Consolidation" or "Planning.
This is in Hyperion 9.3.1 environment all my websites are working. Workspace, Shared Services etc. I checked all my servies and they are working ok.
http://lewisxphub:19000/workspace/index.jsp
Any Ideas?
Thanks
Jay
Edited by: Keerthi on Jan 29, 2009 4:31 AM

I just plugged my iPhone in my computer and now it synced my iPod pictures and everything to it. i would like to go back to nomad, how?

I just plugged my iphone in my computer and it synced my ipod and now everything is messed up, help!

I'm guessing you don't want your Photos synched to your iPhone (and that is your definition of not being "messed up"). It's really pretty hard to tell from your note.
Anyway, if that's the case, in your computer's iTunes display, when you have your iPhone plugged in, click on the iPhone on the left, then the "Photos" tab in that display. Then uncheck the box near the top that says "Sync photos from ...". Then click the "Apply" button near the bottom of the display and all will be well.

Tough question: Can I purchase an off-contract iPhone 5 from Verizon and let my brother use it in Europe?

I have an iPhone 4S with Verizon, and I wanted to know if it would be possible for me to buy an iPhone 5 for the off-contract price just as if I was purchasing it for myself, and then ship it to my brother in Austria and let him use it there on the GSM network.
The reason I think this might be possible is because the GSM part of the Verizon iPhone 5 comes unlocked out of the box (or so I've been told)
One obstacle that might stand in the way is if I have to activate the iPhone 5 with Verizon before I send it to him.
Let me know if this would be possible.

If it is truly unlocked (versus the sim slot being unlocked), then yes you would be able to do this. I have no way of actually verifying if my VZW iPhone 5 is truly unlocked (I don't know of a local iPhone 5 AT&T customer to use their sim to see if my phone will work) but maybe someone on here has been able to verify this further than just what some articles state. Otherwise, if it's just the sim slot being unlocked then you would need to keep the phone active on VZW and your brother can use simcards on Europe to roam instead of paying the VZW roaming charges.

Relative Weight and vCPU allocation query

Hi all
I've done a lot of reading around this subject mainly starting here:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/1234.hyper-v-concepts-vcpu-virtual-processor.aspx
So I know the technical descriptions and some of the background but there is one key area on which I am seeking some clarification if possible.
Most of my Hyper-V experience is with 2008 and 2008R2 so that's what I will be asking about (but it would be useful to know if 2012 changes anything).
I understand the concept of virtual CPUs (vCPU) as given to a VM via the VM settings dialog box. I understand that giving a VM 1 to 4 vCPUs does not give the VM any sort of 1:1 or exclusive right to any of the parent's CPU cores. My understanding is that
(basically) the parent server's cores are formed into a 'pool' and each VM is given a 'time share' of this pool of CPU. I know it is more complex than that due to the way threads may not easily be moved from core to core but let's ignore that!
I understand the 'relative weight' option is used to distribute the 'grunt' from the pool of parent CPU to the VMs such that each VM gets a proportion of the parents CPU-pool as per the ratio of the relative weight scores.
So as an arbitrary, simplified example let's imagine the parent has 2 physical quad core CPUs running at 2.0Ghz. So that's 8 cores running at 2Ghz. So let's imagine the CPU-pool 'grunt' is 16Ghz. (Grunt could be also called 'power', 'horsepower' etc.) I
know it doesn't work out quite like this but this is simplified.
So we add some VMs.
Let's add 4 VMs all with 1 vCPU and all equal 100 relative weight (RW). For the sake of argument all the VMs are 'busy' so that they always need CPU. Let's say each of them shows fairly constant 80% CPU activity in Task Manager within the VM. None of the
VMs are Terminal Servers. Let's also ignore the Hyper-V parent partition's draw on CPU as negligible.
So in this case, if there is contention for the parent CPU, then each of the 4 VMs would be allocated an equal time share of the parent's pool of CPU. So it might be said that on average each VM runs as if it had 4Ghz of 'grunt'. Inside each VM the applications
would see a single vCPU running at 4Ghz. (Bear with me on Ghz, I could have called Ghz 'gruntz' or indeed anything, but I think it helps to talk in terms of Ghz as this is familiar).
Is this correct? Assuming it is then ...
So now I need more 'grunt' to be available to the first VM. So some people may consider two options. Increase the number of vCPU assigned to the VM or increase the Relative Weight. This is where I am confused.
So my question is if the RW is kept constant does increasing the number of vCPU make any more grunt available to a VM or is the grunt simply divided up. For example:
I change VM1 so have 4 vCPU. My understanding is that because RW has not changed then the applications running on VM1 see things change from 1 vCPU running at 4Ghz to 4 vCPUs running at 1Ghz. I surmise this because the RW is what dictates the amount of time
a VM gets on the parent pool of CPU so the VM's allocation (of 4Ghz) must be divided by the number of vCPU.
However I am continually faced with clients asking to allocate more vCPU because they feel this improves the performance of the applications running on the VM, hence I wanted some clarification on whether my understanding is correct or not.
I know that Brian Ehlert, and others, have often stated that it is best to try and give VMs as few vCPUs as possible so that the VM's OS doesn't need to spend time shuffling threads. If this is the case then what is the background or reason for increasing
the allocation of vCPU to a VM? Why add more? When does it have benefit? Is it also required to increase the RW at the same time as adding the vCPU?
It would be great if there was an in-depth article from Microsoft explaining how this all works, in the meantime I'm hoping for some enlightenment from this forum.
Thanks in advance.
Ian

Thanks for your input Ben, that is a very interesting document indeed.
The section that is most pertinent is this one:
<<18.2.3 CPU
Weight
The CPU weight is a relative weight assigned to each of the virtual processors of the partition. Unless otherwise constrained by reserves and caps, the scheduler will attempt to weight the run time of the virtual processors scheduled on
a given logical processor according to their relative weights. Let’s consider the case where three partitions, each with one virtual processor are being scheduled on a single logical processor, their weights are 100, 200 and 700, no reserves or caps are in
effect, and all three of the virtual processors have work to perform (that is, they are not idle). In this case, the fraction of physical CPU capacity provided to the three virtual processors would be approximately
10%, 20%, and 70%.
The CPU weight value is expressed as a decimal value from 1 to 10,000 where 100 (the geometric mean) is the typical value.
By default, a partition’s weight is set to 100.>>
After having read this (and your statement about scheduling processors not VMs) I have had a 'lightbulb moment' where I first understand that the various 'switches' such as Relative Weight are per vCPU and not per VM.
I went back to the online help from Hyper-V and it points to this document:
Performance Tuning Guidelines for Windows Server 2008
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/hardware/gg463394.aspx
In this document there are some useful statements that I was not aware of i.e.
<<Hyper-V in Windows Server 2008 supports up to 16 logical processors and can use all logical processors if the number of active virtual processors matches that of logical processors. This can reduce
the rate of context switching between virtual processors and can yield better performance overall.">>
This is not something that I was aware of. I thought that if you had fewer vCPU than logical CPUs on the host then the vCPU would be shared around the logical CPUs in order to fully utilise the parent CPUs. After reading this above it is obvious that this
is not the case.
And this statement:
<<Virtual Processors
Hyper‑V in Windows Server 2008 supports a maximum of four virtual processors per VM. VMs that have loads that are not CPU intensive should be configured to use one virtual processor. This is because of the additional overhead that is associated
with multiple virtual processors, such as additional synchronization costs in the guest operating system. More CPU-intensive loads should be placed in 2P or 4P VMs if the VM requires more than one CPU of processing under peak load.>>
These two statements lead me to the feeling that it is better to add more vCPU to VMs than fewer if you want to 'make the most of' the CPU you have available on the parent. So going back to my original example of a parent with two quad core CPU (no hyper-threading)
we have 8 logical CPUs available. If we have four VMs that running approximately equal, and busy workloads, we should set each VM to at least 2 vCPU. This would ensure all 8 logical CPUs were used.
First question: What would the potential downside be to setting all four VMs with 4 vCPU which would overcommit the vCPU to logical CPU by a factor of 2. Would this cause scheduling overhead and therefore wasteful of CPU?
Second Question: If I wanted to give a greater share of parent CPU to one of the VMs how would it be best done? Adding more vCPUs to the VM or changing the Relative Weight? Or both? Assuming I was using a Hyper-V 2012 parent that allows more than 4 vCPU
per VM which would be the best way of boosting the performance of one of the VMs:
a) VM1 gets 8 vCPU and each other VM (VM2, VM3 & VM4) each gets 4 vCPU
or
b) VM1 gets 200 Relative Weight and 4 vCPU and each other VM (VM2, VM3 & VM4) each gets 100 Relative Weight and 4 vCPU
Many, many thanks for helping me here.
Ian

Iphone 4s box weight and dimensions

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for