IPhoto 4.0.3 ignores max width/height for export to web page

I just exported a simple page of 6 photos (3 columns) with the default image Max width and height values of 640x480. It did not seem to pay attention to these numbers, because the images produced were 853x639. The thumbnails however were the correct size according to the thumbnail Max width and height values.
Has anyone else experienced this and/or have a solution? Thanks!

Run Disk Utility and repair disk permissions. If that doesn't help, try moving iPhoto to the desktop, duplicate it (Command-D), move the copy to the Applications folder and rename it to just "iPhoto". Now try it. Other than that you might have to reinstall iPhoto and re-update to 4.0.3.
If you have to reinstall you'll have to delete the current application and all files with "iPhoto" in the file name that reside in your HD/Library/Receipts folder beforehand.
OT

Similar Messages

Cannot force max width height for app

Hi
No matter what I set in my app's xml file it will always resize to the device width/height. At this stage we are only supporting iPhone 4 resolution (480x320), so if the app is installed on iPad it should be presented at 480x320 (we are landscape only). I'm not how and where to set this? The initial splash screen displays correctly but once the app has loaded it then reverts to fullscreen. Setting fullscreen to false enables the info bar at the top but the app is still presented at the native iPad resolution.
Thanks for any input.
Ben

In the app descriptor you can set which devices are to be used. If you set it to know devices 1 and 2, then it will fill the screen on the iPad. If you only set it to know device 1, it will show as a little area in the middle of the iPad screen, with the 2X button for the user to use if they wish.
Look for this line:
</InfoAdditions

Can the template used to export a web page in iPhoto be modified?

If not, is there a way at least to change its default settings? Thanks! --pete

I have iPhoto 9.4.3. The command is File>Export>Web page. The dialog box allows the user to set parameters for number of columns and pix per column, photo sizes, page color and template. There are only two template choices and I'd like to know whether additonal templates can be added, and whether there is any way to save the settings for exporting a web page. As usual, it works fine, it just doesn't do everything this user wants.

I made a slide show in iphoto and want to know how to put it on my web page I made with I web

I want to know how to put a slide show (Created in Iphoto) on one of my web pages creaatd in I web

You will have to export it out of iPhoto as a QT movie file and then add that file to the iWeb page.
OT

IPhoto 9.6.1 unable to render file for export

I am now no longer able to export photos as jpg after updating to iPhoto 9.6.1, running Yosemite 10.10.2

Are you running a Managed or a Referenced Library?
A Managed Library, is the default setting, and iPhoto copies files into the iPhoto Library when Importing. The files are then stored in the Library package
A Referenced Library is when iPhoto is NOT copying the files into the iPhoto Library when importing because you made a change at iPhoto -> Preferences -> Advanced. (You unchecked the option to copy files into the Library on import) The files are then stored where ever you put them and not in the Library package. In this scenario you are responsible for the File Management.

IPhoto still won't make web pages using the comments field

I am someone who makes use of the comments field in iPhoto. I don't edit the title, because I thought it edited the photo file name (perhaps only in earlier iPhoto versions). Unfortunately, the Apple's tools for making a web page from iPhoto '08 seem to still use the title field only and not the comment field. That means that I have to edit all titles (to blank or a proper title) if I just want to show an annotation on just a few photos in a web page. At least the comments field defaults to blank, so I normally use it, along with the Better HTML plugin to make web pages, http://www.geeksrus.com/software/betterhtmlexport/
Now, the web pages produced by Apple are now as good as and even better than the BHTML templates, and I'd like to use them. But this problem with the comments means I can't quickly convert my old photo albums to something that makes nice web pages using my annotations with the iPhoto tools.
Does anybody know of any solutions to this problem? E.g. a script to copy the comments field to the title field?

I know what you mean. I can't believe that after so many versions of iPhoto that have supported publishing of some sort that such a basic and obvious feature still hasn't been implemented. It can't take that much effort to add. I'd rather have that than the new (and IMHO completely useless) "Events" feature. Speaking of which, does anyone know if there is a way to turn it off? It's annoying the heck outta me. I hate it.

Native webcam capture width / height

the native width and height capture always seems to be 128x128. how can i change this? it's taking a square crop from the camera and publishing that as the stream.
also, i don't quite understand what resolutionFactor is doing. what are the three native width and height values? does setting resolutionFactor=3 for a 128x128 capture translate to a 384x384 resolution? no matter what i set resolutionFactor to, when i check the stream coming in the nativeWidth/nativeHeight is always 128x128.
can you help me clarify this?
Specifies the resolution factor of captured data; ResolutionFactor values range from 1 (lowest resolution) to 10 (highest resolution). Resolution factor gets multiplied by the native width and height of captured camera. We provide three native width and height values based on aspect ratios. That width and height when multiplied with this factor, gives the resolution.

Hi Adam,
If you look at the source code of StreamManager.as in the player 9 source we provide, we have three set of values for native width/height. I will copy them here
@private
          public static const AR_PORTRAIT_W:Number = 144;
@private
          public static const AR_PORTRAIT_H:Number = 112;
@private
          public static const AR_STANDARD_W:Number = 128;
@private
          public static const AR_STANDARD_H:Number = 128;
@private
          public static const AR_LANDSCAPE_W:Number = 160;
@private
          public static const AR_LANDSCAPE_H:Number = 96;
By default, we use the standard values for nativeWidth and nativeHeight i.e. 128 and 128. When you specify a reslotion factor, the native width and height doesn't change but the capture width and height is multiplied by the factor in
camera.setMode(StreamManager.ARSTANDARD_WresolutionFactor, StreamManager.AR_STANDARD_H resolutionFactor, _fps);
So, if you are setting resolution factor as 3 it will do for standard
_camera.setMode(1283, 1283, _fps); though the native width and height remains the same.
If you want to change them, you need to override the createMyStream function in WebcamPublisher.as and change the nativeWidth and nativeHeight( the code is same for 9 and 10, so even If you are using player 10 swc, you can refer to 9 source of this function), but you don't need to do the native width and height, just changing the resolutionFactor should change the capture width/height for you.
Please refer to updateSettings and createMyStream functions in the source code of WebcamPublisher.as for further clarity.
Hope this helps.
Thanks
Hironmay Basu

Max-width Ignored on fo:block and fo:block-container

I am writing an XSLT template using XSL-FO and I have an fo:block for which I want to limit the width. I set the property max-width to "3in" on the block, and that did nothing. Then I put the block into an fo:block-container and set the max-width property of it to "3in", and this was also ignored.
Is this a bug in the rendering engine or am I doing something wrong?
The block is in an fo:static-content.
Thanks,
Kurz

I'm not exactly sure I get what you intention is, but here are a few things to consider maybe.
max width will not make the image expand, just keep it from being any wider than the max width.
images by default display as in line. To make a width property work reliably, you will need to set it to block:
div#secondaries ol.secondary li div.item-img img {
display: block;
width: 100%;
image width as set above will be affected by its containers. (If you meant to limit the width of the image rather than to resize it, the same thing should still be true of a max-width on the image, though cross-browser support will be unreliable.)
The relevant container for the case above is:
div#secondaries ol.secondary li {
font-size: 1.1em;
width: 30%;
margin-top: 0em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;
margin-left: 0em;
So do you really mean it to be 30% or did you mean 100%.

How do i get the max width and height?

Hey
I want to get the max width and height, so my desktoppanes size can be set automatically.
I know i should use getBounds but i cant find a concrete example on goole, on how to use it.
Can someone point me in the right direction, with an example?

Ok, assuming you want to get the screen resolution, i.e. 1024 x 768.
You will need these imports:
import java.awt.Dimension;
import java.awt.Toolkit;and this line of code:
Dimension myScreen = Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit().getScreenSize() ;You can now use myScreen.width and myScreen.height to access the height and width of your screen's resolution. (width = 1024, height = 768 in my case)
Hope this helps,
Stern
Edited by: Stern on Apr 13, 2008 6:49 AM

What is Max value for Width,Height in "formsweb.cfg" to show full Form

Hi,
I have even changed the SeperateScreen=true and also the width & height parameter in formsweb.cfg but it makes no difference expect showing form now in a seperate window.
Plz help!
Many thanks!

it doesn't need to change SeprateFrame parameter !
i just set these parameters
Width=750
Height=420
it's approximately the size of browser in 800*600 screen size !

Implementation of gtk3's Height-for-width Geometry Management method

I've developed a gtk2 app (Conky Companion) in C to help users of my conky scripts
Click.
create their own conkyrcs with relative ease. A screenshot of the main screen is the following:
http://i.imgur.com/jWl88.jpg
The user can drag and drop icons or labels from the right side to the left, move them, resize them, change their size or colour, etc. When happy, he can press the generate button and generate a conkyrc file.
The screen is a top,non resizable window with a table. The 2 sides of the table are frames in which fixed containers have been put.
Whenever someones tries to place an icon or a label at the right or bottom border of the left frame/fixed container, the widget goes off bounds, as you can see from the screen shot above.
I'm now trying to port the app to Gtk3 and I'm facing a bizarre problem.
Whenever a user tries to place or move an object to the right or bottom border of the left frame/fixed container, it resizes itself to accommodate the newly placed widget.
http://i.imgur.com/d1lc4.jpg
If I move the object to the left (or up), the frame goes back to its size defined by gtk_widget_set_size_request.
Is there a way to make a fixed container... fixed? I don't want it to resize.
The code that places the frame and the fixed container in the window is this:
/* LEFT FRAME */
frame1= gtk_frame_new(NULL);
gtk_table_attach(GTK_TABLE(table), frame1, 0,14,0,49,GTK_SHRINK,GTK_SHRINK,0,0);
gtk_widget_set_size_request(frame1, 360,570);
gtk_widget_show(frame1);
/* LEFT FRAME - FIXED CONTAINER */
fixed1 = gtk_fixed_new();
gtk_widget_set_has_window(fixed1,TRUE);
gtk_container_add(GTK_CONTAINER(frame1),fixed1);
gtk_widget_modify_bg (fixed1, GTK_STATE_NORMAL, &color);
gtk_drag_dest_set (
fixed1, GTK_DEST_DEFAULT_ALL,
target_list, 1, GDK_ACTION_COPY|GDK_ACTION_MOVE);
g_signal_connect (fixed1, "drag-drop",G_CALLBACK (dr_data_rec_1d1), (gpointer)fixed1);
gtk_widget_show(fixed1);
I've tried the following things:
1)Fiddling with GTK_EXPAND and GTK_FILL for the placement of the frame. No change.
2)gtk_window_set_geometry_hints for the window, table, frame and fixed container. No change.
3)Replacing gtk_table with gtk_grid. No change.
After posting on StackOverflow, I was advised to consult the following page
http://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/3.2/ch2 … #id1482126
which I did. If I understood correctly, the new way of declaring
/* LEFT FRAME */
frame1= gtk_frame_new(NULL);
gtk_table_attach(GTK_TABLE(table), frame1, 0,14,0,49,GTK_SHRINK,GTK_SHRINK,0,0);
gtk_widget_set_size_request(frame1, 360,570);
is (ignore the height for the time being)
static void
my_widget_get_preferred_width (GtkWidget *widget,
gint *minimal_width,
gint *natural_width)
GtkRequisition requisition;
gtk_widget_get_requisition (widget, &requisition);
*minimal_width = *natural_width = requisition.width;
/* LEFT FRAME */
frame1= gtk_frame_new(NULL);
gtk_table_attach(GTK_TABLE(table), frame1, 0,14,0,49,GTK_SHRINK,GTK_SHRINK,0,0);
gint min_width=360;
gint nat_width=360;
GTK_WIDGET_GET_CLASS(frame1)->get_preferred_width=my_widget_get_preferred_width;
my_widget_get_preferred_width(frame1,&min_width,&nat_width);
It compiles OK, but, when run, it gives me this error:
(conky_companion:19700): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkFrame 0xa00e660: widget tried to gtk_widget_get_width inside GtkWidget ::get_width implementation.
without ever drawing the window and it segfaults after a while.
What am I missing here?
Or, TL;DR, what is the equivalent of
gtk_widget_set_size_request(frame1, 360,570);
in gtk3? (StackOverflow gave up, you're my last hope)

Solved (?).

Using PNG format with max width without clipping top and bottom of image?

I am using PNG format to preserve the transparency and drop shadow I am trying to incorporate to give the illusion that this slab object is floating above the other layers. I first tried file>place to position the menu object on edge of header/beginning of content. Doing that leaves no options to force the image to span the width of whatever screen. I need that so I've tried using object>fill> and then clicking the max width of the rectangle (which does solve the max width problem), but I am now dealing with a clipping problem of the top and bottom of the image. The next thing I can think of is to go back to Photoshop and distort the image so it isn't as tall. I feel there has to be a simpler way to accomplish this that won't also give my image a unnatural look. Thoughts? Thanks in advance.

Thanks, that helps. I also found that I cropped to much of the canvas. After increasing the canvas area AND setting to fill all is well now. I think your suggestion may help with the scrolling affect problem I'm having when using different resolutions. I am going to try to set the size in one dimension (height) so that different resolution screens see the same scroll actions. Thanks Mylenium!

Width*height vals changing in save for web ??

Hi all
I've opened an EPS file in illustrator cs4. And its width & height values are differing with width & height values in "save for web" option.
For example, normally in width & height boxes shows as
width : 247.499 pt
height : 116.524 pt
but in save for web
width : 249
height : 117
I've checked with various figures too.

Script lan : javascript
thanks for ur help!
Actually I've to resize the figure for the width 175, 525, 1400 and the height should change proportionally. So I tried, but I couldn't resize the figures using save for web. Becoz its horizontalScale & verticalScale treats values as percentage. eg. 175 treats as 175%. Then I grouped all items and changed its "width" and foud out the values' corresponding "height" values. But the problem is, exported file's values are changing nearly 3pts.
could u help on this?

How can I have a fluidarea with max width set?

I have a design where I want a div with the background set to full width - hence 100%
<div id="ContentArea" style="width:100%;background-color:#F55; >
<div id="FIXEDCOLUMN" style="width:60px; >
some content goes here
</div>
<div id="FLUIDAREA" style="width:MAX900;background-color:#FFF; >
some content goes here
</div>
</div>
I want to be able so set the div FLUIDAREA to a max width of 900
I want FIXEDCOLUMN to the left of FLUIDAREA (using float left or something)
I want the columns FIXEDCOLUMN and FLUIDAREA to be centred within the ContentArea (setting margin width to auto I assume???)
How can I achieve this?
Do I need another div around these to max 960 to wrap them up?
Thank you.

As simple as that!!!
Hmmm.
I've been searching with google for that but getting all sorts of answers.
Thank you for all your help.
Terry

Images are no longer scaling with (img {max-width: 100%; }) in css as of update 34.0.5 in firefox, this still works great in IE and chrome.

My website worked great until firefox update 34.0.5. Now the images will not scale to fit the box anymore. I am using flexbox so that the site scales to fit the size of the browser. In css I set img {max-width:100%;} and this would make the jpg files automatically size to fit the box they were in, but not anymore as Mozilla has really screwed this up with update 34.0.5. My site still works great with IE and Chrome but 70% of my web traffic is using firefox so I really would like this to work in firefox.
Any help is greatly appreciated!

I had the same problem, and this worked for me:
img {max-width:100%; width:100%;}

IPhoto 4.0.3 ignores max width/height for export to web page

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for