IPhoto conversion to JPEG poor quality

I have a Nikon D70s Digital camera and upload my Nikon raw files (.NEF) to an external drive connected to my iMac. I then use iPhoto 08 to import the pictures to the library. I then export to a folder on the desktop coverting them to JPEG (for printing) using the best quality and biggest size. The size of the files are from around 5MB in NEF format and after converting to JPEG it's around 1.3MB.
Now, I do realize that the formats are different and they will change in size, however:
When I use Nikon View on my iMac and open the files in .NEF format, convert to JPEG, best quality, biggest size and export the file, the size is around 3.4MB.
I am doing the same things but in different programs. I then send the JPEG files (iPhoto, Nikon View) off for printing at 3 different labs. After getting them back the iPhoto prints are very, very dull, bad colouring where as the Nikon View prints are vibrant and full of colour.
Anybody, help or have the same problem?

I am having a similar problem with an Olympus E410.
My wife imports the pics into her Macbook using iPhoto, and I copy them onto my PC using the camera as an external USB hard drive.
She ordered Kodak pictures through iPhoto and the quality was very bad. The pictures were dark, had low color, and looked as though there was a grey film over the photos.
I did a test order through my PC by loggin onto the Kodak website and uploading my versions of the same pictures, and the quality was very good.
We though she had recieved a bad batch on her initial order, so we did a second test from the Mac, and had the same bad quality. It seems as though something is wrong with iPhoto, and I was wondering if anyone has found a solution to this issue or knows what might be happening.
Thanks,
Trackaholic

Similar Messages

Burning iPhoto slideshow thru iDVD, poor quality

Hello,
i am having quality issues concerning my slideshow when burned onto a DVD thru iDVD. the slideshow is created in iPhoto with photos taken with a 10 megapixel camera. the photos look great when viewed thru my camera on my HD flatscreen tv. when i play the burned DVD on my tv, they look like low resolution photos and not as large on the screen. i have "professional quality" and NTSC format selected in the project settings. when i view the backed-up photos saved on the burned DVD as a DVD-ROM on my computer, they look great. help, suggestions?

i doubt Apple would have included three settings of quality in it's program if it couldn't deliver. especially one entitled "professional quality".
That has NOTHING to do with the quality of the slideshows that are produced - 0.3 megapixels says it all!
'Best Peformance' uses fixed bit-rate encoding that produces a DVD with about as high a playback bit-rate as a player can handle. 'Best Performance' can fit up to 60 minutes of content on a single layer disc. 5 minutes or 55 minutes, the encoded bit rate is the same.
'High Quality' uses a fixed bit-rate encoding rate that approximately fills a DVD with your content (the fixed encoding bit-rate is adjusted based on your content length). 'High Quality' can fit up to 120 minutes of content on a single layer disc. If you have 60 minutes of content or less, the bit-rate will be close to the 'Best Performance' bit-rate (although experience has shown that 'Best Performance' looks better than 'High Quality with less than 60 minutes of content). 120 minutes of content will be compressed more than 60 minutes of content.
'Professional Quality' (new with iDVD '08) uses two pass variable bit-rate encoding. If you have 60 minutes of content or less, the bit-rate will be close to the 'Best Performance' bit-rate. 'Professional Quality' can fit up to 120 minutes of content on a single layer disc. As your content gets closer to 120 minutes, 'Professional Quality' will usually look better than 'High Quality'.

Why are my photos i receive from iphoto and aperture such poor quality? On my iMac, they look fine, but when i get the pictures, they are awful. The color looks like there's a gray fog on them, and they're not focused well.

I use 2 great cameras, download them to iphoto, and now trying aperture. I edit the photos, they look fine, order pictures, and they are terrible! Looks like there's a gray haze on them, their dark, color is awful. Please help me out here!

What service are you using?
What is the color space of the image? If it is AdobeRGB, try using sRGB.

How do I delete unwanted photos (duplicates, poor quality How do I delete unwanted photos (duplicates, poor quality or old ones thator oones that I just don't want) from my IPhoto Library.I followed the instruction from Help and neither suggestion worked.

How do I delete unwanted photos (duplicates, poor quality or old ones that I just don't want) from my IPhoto Library.I followed the instruction from Help and neither suggestion worked.
Tried to select and press delete key...didn't work
Tried to select, press arrow on lower right and move to trash.. didn't work

select a photo in an event and either drag it to the iPhoto trash or press the delete key - then empty theiPhoto trash an dthe system trash and the photo is totally gone from the system
LN

IPhoto album to iMovie to iDVD, poor quality of projected images

I am preparing a slide show of digital photo images. The finished product shows poor quality images. I am import the images as an album to iMovie, add a few title slides, then export either to media file or directly to iDVD. The results remain unacceptable when projected on a flat panel HD TV. Where am I going wrong?
Marks 3

If you are using the Share ➙ iDVD menu in iMovie, don't. Use the Share ➙ Media Browser menu option and then drag the movie frome the Media/Movies pane in iDVD into the projects menu window. The Share ➙ iDVD route noticibly degrades the resulting movie. What size movie are you sending to iDVD? It should be Medium or Large.
What size images in iPhoto are you using? They shoujld be cropped to the 4:3 size ratio for iDVD before adding to either iMovie or iDVD.
Have you considered creating the slideshow in iDVD by adding the album of photos via the Media/Photos pane in iDVD. I've found I get better results that way. However, there is a 99 slide limit with that workflow.
What do you mean by poor quality. When going from a photo on your monitor to a TV screen the media gets resized and compressed/encoded down to 640 x 480 which can't duplicate the high resolution of the original image viewed on the monitor.
OT

Fujifilm X100T poor quality RAW conversion?

I've been experiencing what appears to be poor quality RAW image conversion from the new Fujifilm X100T camera that is now supported by Lightroom 5.7.
It appears that Lightroom may be "honoring" the Chromatic Aberration correction that the camera itself writes to the EXIF files. This causes images with high contrast areas to appear very blurry or almost like they've had a filter applied to make them appear hand drawn. It may also be that the camera itself isn't focusing properly, but my tests confirm that the camera can focus just fine.
I've collected a few examples and additional details here:
http://bigempty.com/projects/2014/fujix100t/
Generally speaking I don't apply any in-camera sharpening, noise reduction, or other corrections as I prefer to work with the RAW file in Lightroom. The examples linked above do not apply any post-capture noise reduction, sharpening, chromatic aberration correction, or any other post-capture edits.
Has anyone else experienced this with the Fuji X100T? Is this typical of the X100 series image quality, or with Lightroom's processing of those RAW images?

Besides white-balance, Adobe software generally ignores what camera settings you use. The poor quality is just the best Adobe has been able to do with unique XTrans photosite color layout. Adobe software is apparently optimized to the common RGBG photosite layout.

Poor quality iPhoto slideshows when imported to fcpx

When I imported my iphoto slideshows into fcpx the quality is terrible. I have tried everything I can think of but no luck. I export them as a QT movie then import them. Is there a better way or correct way to preserve the original quality?

I am also using a D80, and just recently switched from jpeg fine to RAW thinking it would give me some more flexibility in the post processing ... but I too have found that the images are very grainy...I'm a novice at some of the cutting edge digital editing technology... hence the use of Iphoto... but I'm disappointed that it seems my image quality has suffered.
any thoughts?

Why is an "original" iPhoto export poorer quality than my original photo?!

Hi Everyone,
I hope you're all well. I had a question regarding iPhoto - I have an SLR which takes really good quality pictures, and I wanted to back them up in more than one location. I already have them in my iPhoto library - however, when I tried to export them with the "Original" option on File Export, and compared the exported version to the ones in iPhoto, its poorer quality than the one in iPhoto! Even though I selected "Original" quality!! However, when I exported it using PNG, it was exactly like the photos imported in to iPhoto. I understand that PNG is a lossless file format, but I am very confused as to why exporting photos in its original format gives a worse quality picture!
Would someone please be able to explain what is going on, and why the original export is much worse than PNG?
Thank you for your time!
Regards

How are you determining that the export is "much worse" than the imported photo
What format are you shooting on the DSLR (I assume it is digital)? What format are you exporting?
For what it is worth I do two daily backups (Time Machine running hourly and a daily bootable clone of my entier system) and I dod an occasional off site backup and I use three 32 GB level 10 SD cards so even shooting 16 MP RAW I only rotate back to the oldest card about once a year giving me a year's originals in addito=ion to my other backups
LN

I must be doing something stupid: Very poor quality DVD rendering!

I am new to Apple products and after trolling this forum, I was able to create a DVD using iDVD on my Mac mini Core Duo - 2Ghz model. But, the video is of very poor quality (compression artifacts). I am lookging for guidance to creating a better video quality. But first, let me give you some background...
I have created enough DVDs for my home videos captured both from my S-VHS camcorder and min-DV camcorders (both PAL and NTSC) using Pinnacle Studio (buggiest software in the world) and Adobe Premiere Elements under Windows. I have clear expectation of video quality and understand the quality differences between various standards.
I have a fairly new toy - Canon Powershot TX1 digital camera which is an amazing compact camera that shoots 720p video @ 30fps and stores them in MJPEG format. Very good optics (10x optical image stabilized zoom). The only con is that it has very poor low light shooting ability.
The steps I took to create this DVD...
1. Import the .avi and .jpeg files from my camera into iPhoto library.
2. Use iMovie (all part of iLife'08) to stitch the avi clips and also some of jpegs. Added transitions, titles and music in iMovie.
3. Also, added some of my old low resolution avi files (from my older Canon camera - probably in 640x480 resolution).
3. Exported it in the largest file mode (960x540) which created a 1.8GB file.
4. Opened this movie file in Garageband and added the Chapter markers.
5. Shared it with iDVD which automatically launched iDVD and showed the chapters in very nice scene selections menus.
6. Invoked the Burn menu to burn the movie into a DVD using iDVD.
Am I using the right methodology (I want the chapters)? I also observed that an earlier project which was pure 15 minutes of 720p content created a 4.7GB size exported file from iMovie whereas this current project has 51min of avi (of which about 10min is low res and the rest is in 720p format) and 12min of still photos produced a 1.8GB file when exported. This clearly tells me that the exported file is of poor quality. Why did that happen? Was it because I mixed the content and included low res videos?
I should probably try creating a DVD from the pure 720p content and see how that looks.
Any pointers would be a great help. BTW, the mac mini, iPhoto and iMovie forums are just awesome. The quality of posts and responses is very high.

Thanks a lot, F Shippey.
I exported it as a .dv file and then I was able to produce the DVD correctly with the Revolution theme and 11 chapters. I haven't done any editing any clips yet in iMovie. In most cases, I will not need to do that in most cases as the Canon TX1 creates individual avi clips every time I record and stop a recording. Having used a camcorder for over a decade now, I know how silly most of the recordings are.
I will be rendering most of my videos as h.264 so that I can use the mac mini as a media server instead of using DVDs. I have to rip my own DVDs as h.264 soon (back to handbrake).
PS: While creating my first DVD in OS X + iLife'08 tools, I noticed the following bugs:
1. The clips disappear from the display in the editing window when the project becomes large and I had to zoom in and out to make them reappear. I verified that I wasn't viewing past the end of the last clip. If I hover the mouse in the blank window, it will show the clip in the preview window on the right.
2. I had 11 chapters marked in Garageband and then I shared it with iDVD, it created two pages of scene selections with 6 chapters in each page. In the 2nd page, it added a random window (unconnected) for the 12th chapter that I didn't have. I didn't check for that and so my finished DVD has this weird 12th chapter with a copied moving clip in the window, but when selected, it doesn't do anything.
These two bugs are way few compared to what Pinnacle Studio threw at me.
Message was edited by: new2appletv

Poor quality printing

About a year ago I remember seeing frequent complaints about the poor quality printing in photo books.
Is anyone else still having problems? I just recieved 2 books and I am just unimpressed (and quite disappointed) with the print quality.
One is a duplicate of a book I had printed through My Publisher last year and there is a night and day difference. The My Publisher book looks far superior.
I was having difficulty with My Publisher so I decided to give Apple's service a try.
I'm shooting with an 8mp dSLR camera (Canon) so I should have no issue with 8x10 prints. My scanned images were all at 300dpi.
Many of the photos in the book I've had printed locally and there is a big quality difference.
Is anyone seeing this problem or did I just get unlucky?
THANKS!

Welcome to the Apple Discussions. The Apple book cannot compete with your printing of the photos or pages on your own inkjet printer or thru a photofinisher. It uses a different type of printer. The current books (all sizes) are printed at 300 dpi. Here's what Apple send me regarding the books printing and material quality:
I contacted Apple and asked for information that I could pass on. Here's the reply I received from Apple:
"Thank you for contacting the Apple Print Products Customer Service.
I understand that you would like to know the printing process that is used and the color mode the files should be in, so you can better advise users in the iPhoto forum.
iPhoto version 4 or later, allows you to import and print files through the Apple Print Product service as RGB, grayscale, or CMYK color space. JPEG files with RGB color space are recommended for best results.
While iPhoto 2 can import files of various formats, including RGB color, grayscale, and CMYK, this version requires JPEG files with RGB color space when printing photos and books.
For more information regarding iPhoto 2, please visit the following article:
iPhoto: Color, Black and White Prints Appear Garbled or Distorted
For more information regarding iPhoto 5, please visit the following article:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=165501
Here are some of the technical specifications for the books, cards, and calendars. I hope this gives you an idea about their quality and form.
BOOKS
All iPhoto books are printed using acid-free paper for long-lasting image quality. The photos are printed at a high resolution (300DPI if you use iPhoto 6). There is no external modification--such as sharpening or contrast adjustment--of the photos; what you see in the application is what is printed in the book.
Hardcovers Books
The cover is hard-bound and covered in linen. You select the linen color during the book-ordering process. The hardcover books have a solid, stiff binding that is glued and crimped. The internal pages, measuring 8.5 x 11 inches, are printed on McCoy 100# Text Gloss paper stock.
Softcover Books
The softcover books come in three sizes:
- Large 8.5 x 11 inches
- Medium 6 x 8 inches
- Small 2.6 x 3.5 inches
All of the softcover books have internal pages that are printed on McCoy 100# Text Gloss paper stock. The large softcover book has a white cover (Kromekoteplus Folding Cover, 16 point) with a cutout on the front that reveals the cover-page photo in the book. The covers for the medium and small softcover books have the cover image and title printed directly on the cover. All of the softcover books have a glued binding and feature a thick cover of McCoy 100# Cover Gloss paper stock.
CARDS
All cards are printed on McCoy 120# Silk Cover paper stock. The postcards measure 4 x 6 inches, and the greeting cards measure 5 x 7inches.
CALENDARS
All calendars measure 8 x 10 inches and are printed on McCoy 100# Silk Cover paper stock.
To ensure the best print quality, we have chosen to use Kodak NexPress technology. The press uses a dry toner, which is fused to the surface of the paper. Please see NexPress' site for more information:
KODAK NEXPRESS 2500 Digital Production Color Press
I hope you find this information helpful in answering questions on the iPhoto forum."
Do you Twango?
TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
I've written an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.
MBP 2.16Ghz; G5 Dual Core 2GHz, 2G RAM ea, 250G HD; G4 Dual 1Ghz, 1.5G RAM; Mac OS X (10.4.10) 22" LCD, 710G FW HDs, Canon: SD700IS/i850/LIDE 50, Epson R200, 30G iPod, 2G Nano

Poor quality RAW file when captured on Nikon D80 and imported

Anyone,
I shoot a Nikon D80 and when I import the RAW files, mostly when shot in RAW+JPG(fine, normal, basic) format, the RAW file turns out in very poor quality, usually alot of Noise in pic. It never use to do that before, is it just because it is coupled with +JPG files? Help would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers

I am also using a D80, and just recently switched from jpeg fine to RAW thinking it would give me some more flexibility in the post processing ... but I too have found that the images are very grainy...I'm a novice at some of the cutting edge digital editing technology... hence the use of Iphoto... but I'm disappointed that it seems my image quality has suffered.
any thoughts?

Saving a Project In Pages, Images Poor Quality in PDF

I have just purchased IWork 09, i am new to pages and so far find the software very handy and easy to use to make very attractive documents.
i have one dilemma though.
i save a (e.g.) poster in pages, but when i go to open it in PDF Preview, the images that i have inputted into the document are distorted or of a poor quality, when i open them in pages they are fine?.... also when i go 2 open the saved document in Adobe Reader 9, it wont open? i tried taking frames and shadows etc out just in case they are not supported, like in MS Word but still no luck. i have to send flyers for advertizment via e-mail to clients who are more than likely using Windows Xp or Vista.
if some one could help with
1. Getting my images to stay good quality
2. opening it in adobe 9
it would be very much appreciated
jimbest

You can not see which programs have been involved in each compression, but as far as I know, at least some programs store information about both themselves (last edited by) and the compression level in the exif/iptc data.
The right way to work is to get as much data as possible off the colour capture in high bit and do the exposure correction getting into a normalised colour space either still in high bit or in scaled down 8 bit to save space.
The pixels should be left alone from this phase and out. It is not necessary to change a single source pixel either in matching to the display, the printer or the press. All of this is done on the fly in memory and not be changing the pixels in the disk-based image document.
As interchange file format for corrected colour captures stored in the normalised colour space, either use a linearised RGB space or high-bit CIELab. The file format should be lossless TIFF and not lossy JPEG (the way JPEG works internally is lossy by definition).
Live Picture and Apple Aperture are alike in the way they work. Rather than taking the pixels into memory for correction, which is they way Photoshop worked, they construct a colour managed proxy for manipulation and then provide for a rendering that is non-destructive.
Live Picture required ColorSync 2 and Apple Aperture is unable to work without colour management for the same set of reasons. Apple Pages is unable to work without colour management for the same set of reasons, although there are additional reasons for Apple Pages.
Just my ten cents,
/hh

Poor quality image with doing videos with photos/images HELP!

Hello,
I bought Adobe Premiere Element to make videos with pictures. When I do the video, the quality of my photos is good. When I save the video on my computer or I download it on youtube (example) the quality of my photos is extremely poor. Why? Does anyone can help me? Thank you!

What Project Preset did you choose at New Project? In the case of Video, composed of Still Images ONLY, you would set that to your desired delivery specs. Not so, if you are also using Video. I tried several types of parameters. Some parameters give poor quality when I upload it to Youtube (for example) and others in the design of video and upload to YouTube. So which settings should I use for photos only ?
This sounds like you are talking about the Export/Share settings for output to YouTube.
What I was asking is what did you start off with, when you were at New Project?
If you are doing an SD Project, you will have either 720 x 480 (NTSC), or 720 x 576 (PAL) pixels in the Project's Frame Size. If that is what you want, then I would Scale your camera original Stills to 640 x 480 (for NTSC), as you have Square Pixels, and the Project will have either 0.9 for NTSC Standard, or 1.21 for NTSC Widescreen).
PrE can Scale the Still Images, but the Scaling algorithms in Photoshop are much better, and offer more control.
Now, if you wish to do an HD Project, just choose that as your Preset, and then use the Images in about their original size. Note, there will be some black borders, as the screen-caps most likely have a different Aspect Ratio, than a Video Project, which for HD will be 16:9. Especially with screen-caps, that are pretty low resolution to begin with, I would NOT do any Scaling, and would live with the letterboxing, or pillar boxing, rather than Scale and effectively Crop.
Also, when Scaling in Photoshop, I do not Save_As JPEG, as it introduces compression, but only as either PSD (Photoshop's native format), or PNG.
Good luck,
Hunt

Poor Quality Export to AVI

Hi im a newcomer to Premier Pro and need some help in adjusting my settings for exporting my video.
The video in question is made up of 5 seperate videos (created from still jpegs with ImageVideoMachine at 1024x768 with 24fps and 1080HD Profile). When I view these videos seperately they are good quality and do not have any problems. However after i imported them to Premier Pro and added an audio track in the background and a small bit of text the quality after export is really bad in places.
I have tried lots of different settings in the export but just cant seem to get it right. The main problems that seem to occur is when the camera moves quickly from one scene to another and it seems to get very blurry and pixelated and sort of like half the scene is catching up (hope this makes sense!).
The entire video is only 4 and a half minutes long so I am not too worried about the size of the file. Any help would be greatly appreciated as im at a loss what to try next and the poor quality of the video takes away so much from my hard work in creating the presentation.
Hoping you can help
Alan

Just as further information for anyone who can help. These are the properties of one of the five .avi files I created using ImageVideoMachine. As I said these play at a good quality and without any pixelation of blurriness.
1.avi
Type: AVI Movie
File Size: 32.6 MB
Image Size: 1024 x 768
Pixel Depth: 1024
Frame Rate: 24.00
Total Duration: 00:00:41:21
Average Data Rate: 797 KB / second
Pixel Aspect Ratio: 1.0
AVI File details:
Contains 1 video track(s) and 0 audio track(s).
Video track 1:
Size is 32.58M bytes (average frame = 33.20K bytes)
There are 76 keyframes, 929 delta frames.
Frame rate is 24.00 fps
Frame size is 1024 x 768
Depth is 24 bits.
Compressor: 'DX50', ffdshow Video Codec
Now these are the properties of the best quality export from Premier Pro after I edited my video. Although this is my best quality export it is still very poor quality compared to the original videos I am using to create it.
Type: AVI Movie
File Size: 212.6 MB
Image Size: 1024 x 756
Pixel Depth: 1024
Frame Rate: 24.00
Source Audio Format: 48000 Hz - 16 bit - Stereo
Project Audio Format: 48000 Hz - 32 bit floating point - Stereo
Total Duration: 00:04:11:00
Average Data Rate: 867 KB / second
Pixel Aspect Ratio: 1.333
AVI File details:
Contains 1 video track(s) and 1 audio track(s).
Interleave: 1 : 24.00
Video track 1:
Size is 166.44M bytes (average frame = 36.10K bytes)
This movie appears to have DROPPED FRAMES
There are 28 keyframes, 5905 delta frames.
There are 91 empty frames.
Frame rate is 24.00 fps
Frame size is 1024 x 756
Depth is 24 bits.
Compressor: 'DX50', ffdshow Video Codec
Audio track 1:
Size is 45.95M bytes
Rate is 48000 samples/sec
Sample size is 16 bits
Hope this helps you to understand what im trying to do here.
Thanks again
Alan

Poor quality images on Slideshow

Hello all,
I recently downloaded Aperture from the Mac App store - seemed to good a bargain not to and I was already considering upgrading from iPhoto 08.
I imported all my pictures (along with the captions) into Aperture and created a slideshow from an album. I was quite disappointed to see that the image quality was really poor and very grainy. The photos themselves were fine in the album - but not so in the slideshow.
I thought this may have been down to importing from iPhoto, so I experimented by adding other images directly into Aperture. The same slideshow quality issue arose. I also possess a MacBook Pro and decided to re-perform the steps described above. The images and slideshow are absolutely fine on my MacBook pro.
I wish to maintain my photo library on my main iMac and will be very downhearted if Aperture cannot give me the same picture quality on slideshows that I achieved in iPhoto. Can anyone help me figure out why I'm suffering from poor quality images in slideshows on my iMac?
Thanks in advance,
Simon.

Hi Simon,
Aperture uses the image Preview in Slideshows:
_About Displaying Sharp Images in Slideshows_
To display slideshows at the best quality, you should set Aperture to create high-resolution previews. In addition to setting previews to their highest resolution, you should also use full-size previews to prevent upscaling with large displays. If previews are not available, images in the slideshow may not be as sharp as they would be otherwise. For more information about creating high-resolution previews, see Working with Preview Images.
From the [User Manual|http://documentation.apple.com/en/aperture/usermanual/index.html#chapter=21%26se ction=2]
What size Previews do you have?

IPhoto conversion to JPEG poor quality

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for