Iphoto11, noise reduction dont save. it goes retour to de original if i restart the programm.

If i use "noise reduction", iphoto maks it. it works. but if i quit the photo or copie the photo, ist lost de reduction effect.
(sorry for my englisch)

I'm suffering this same problem. Any changes I make to the de-noise slider are lost when the file is exported. Within iPhoto itself, the changes are visible. But the exported image shows none of the noise-reduction. I've noticed that this bug is present on all large images. Smaller-size photos do not seem to be plagued by this problem, however. I do hope that this bug is fixed soon.
David Mills
Huntington, WV

Similar Messages

  • When i close firefox.how to save firefox.without losing any data,and when i restart.the tabs come back.how

    how to save firefox,without losing data.that means when i am closing firefox its not asking to svae or not

    In the Tools menu select Options to open the options dialog. Select the General panel and change the setting "When Firefox starts" to "Show my windows and tabs from last time".

  • Noise Reduction and RAW

    I use a Rebel T4i, but the model really should not matter I think.
    When Hi ISO or Long Exposure Noise Reduction is set does it apply to RAW?
    I am under the impression that RAW get no additional processing. But I'm learning to look at my images in new ways. Something doesn't add up. It seems like the noise reduction is applied to RAW images. My mind is going to explode pretty soon if somebody doesn't set me straight.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Long exposure noise reduction is applied directly to RAW.  It's "destructive", burnt into the file.  It takes the noise readings from the second "dark" shot and subtracts them from the first image, and creates a single RAW out of it.
    High ISO noise on the other hand is just listed as a setting.  Programs like Lightroom will ignore it, but some programs, like Canon's DPP will apply it on import.  I don't use it so I can't say for sure, but I'd imagine that you can adjust it since it's just a setting.

  • Noise reduction on track1 using noise print from track2

    I have an audio track from a video project that was recorded on track1 that has a lot of interference from the wirelss mic that was so strong that it crossed over to the idle track2. Track1 has the voice and interference intermixed. Track2 just has the interference. How can I take a noise print from track2 and use it to reduce the corresponding noise on track1? Any ideas?

    Bristol87 wrote:
    In addition, to make the process more challenging, I am unable to get the audio in the edit frame to play at the same gain as in the multi-track frame. In edit mode I seem to be at a 0db gain whereas the multi-track is playing at over 12 to 20db.
    I am also unclear how to get the changes back to Final Cut. When I go to File to save it I do not see a Save option that would transfer the edited audio back to the Final Cut Project.
    For the additional items you mention:
    1. In your multi-track project, check your volume envelopes on the track, and check the level on your submix and master. To do this, click the the disclosure triangle just left of the track name. You'll see in purple the envelopes section, which is like keyframes in FCP.
    2. You have to export a mix to send it back to FCP. Go to File -> Export, save the master mix with a file name, and most likely as an aiff file, then in the dropdown "After Export" choose "Send to Final Cut Pro Sequence."
    For your noise reduction questions - applying noise reduction is for broadband, sustained noise, like an air conditioner or a hum. Are you trying to apply the same noise reduction to several files because they have the same type of background noise? I generally just save my settings, but set a new noise print for each file. I'll give you a quick step by step:
    Select a bit in the file where there's JUST noise. Then go to Process -> Noise Reduction -> Set Noise Print. Then select the entire file, and go to Process -> Noise Reduction -> Reduce Noise. When the noise reduction window comes up, you just need to listen and play with the settings until you're satisfied with how it sounds. As a starting point, take a look at the level of the noise alone, and use that as the threshold. Usually 100% noise reduction doesn't sound good, but you just have to use some trial and error. Too much sounds worse than too little, in my opinion. When satisfied, apply it and save the preset.
    Hope this helps!
    Matthew

  • Noise reduction on almost chroma key edges

    I have a footage of a person in a white tee shirt in front of a very intense bright yellow backgroung (It looks like a chroma-key).
    On the edges of the person and specialy on the edges of the white tee shirts (that is a over-exposed) there is some noise / artefacts.
    I desaturated in FCP with the 3 way filter for the yellow to get less intense.
    I checked plugins sites like: Natress, CHV, Kurt Hennrich and revisionfx and they have noise reduction plugins.
    But I was wandering if anyone knows what's the best plugin (or filter) for this kind of noisy / artefact edges problem ?
    Also, is there any setting in Compressor that could help to reduce this ?
    I filmed on DVCAM NTSC, and this is for a DVD (replications).
    Thanks.

    Wow, you've got a bunch of problems here starting with your camera of choice which I'm assuming since it was DVCAM, was something like a PD150/170, the choice of video format which is extremely compressed, the exposure.
    I think your main issue stems from video format and exposure, however. Depending upon the camera model, you probably should dial down your chroma settings and for something like this, I may have been inclined to under-expose a bit.
    There is a very good reason that good lenses cost as much as cars or houses. Cheap cameras with cheap lensing exhibit a bit of chromatic aberration which you've also got going on. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromatic_aberration
    Your best solution would be to reshoot with a more robust video format if possible. You can try creating an edge matte for the yellow background and applying a light blur/defocus to the edge matte.
    If Goggi comes up with a suitable solution be sure to post the details for future readers.

  • Script for noise reduction

    I would like to apply noise reduction using a script. I captured the noise profile then recorded the script.
    When I play it back, nothing happens. If I select "stop at dialogs" then the noise reduction dialog comes up and tells me that I need to capture a profile.
    Is there any way to use the existing captured profile in a script?
    Bruce

    Thank you, that did it!
    For the benefit of anyone else wanting to use noise reduction in a script, here is all you need to do. Before recording the script, capture and save the noise profile. In the example below, it is saved to
    i C:\my_profile.fft.
    Then record the script. In the noise reduction dialog, select
    i Load from Profile
    and choose the profile you saved. Adjust any other parameters, do the noise reduction and save the script.
    Here's an example of what a script that just does noise reduction looks like:
    Title: NR Test
    Description: Applies noise reduction process
    Mode: 4
    Undo: 1
    Selected: 0 to 605032 scaled 605032 SR 48000
    Freq: Off
    cmd: Channel Both
    Selected: 0 to 605032 scaled 605032 SR 48000
    Freq: Off
    Comment: Restoration\Noise Reduction (process)
    cmd: {974C27BF-7D77-4136-B697-0941F91251D7}
    1: 0.6
    2: 0
    3: C:\my_profile.fft
    4: 4096
    5: 4000
    6: 7
    7: 48000
    8: 1
    9: 32
    10: 4
    11: 2.88106e-011
    12: 1.94006e-006
    13: 2.80101e-010
    14: 1.94061e-006
    15: 4000
    16: 6
    17: 2
    18: 1
    19: 2
    20: 0
    21: 1000
    22: 16384
    23: 1000
    24: 0
    25: 1
    26: 1
    27: 0
    28: 0
    29: 9
    30: 65
    31: 0
    Freq: Off
    End:
    Bruce

  • Record actions bug. does not execute the dont save action even though it acknowledges in action list

    i am using macbook pro running Lion
    so i am trying to save a series of actions that i want applied to a batch of images. i do all the actions correctly (i've done this before in earlier version of photoshop). stop recording my actions, and open the same image to make sure the automation process works properly and i get the same image through automation that i got when building my actions. one
    of the actions is cutting and pasting a portion of the image in a different location, yet during the automation it always ends up somewhere else, and not in the same place, which makes no sense. another issue is during the recording of my actions i close out of all the files b4 i stop recording and click dont save. so this should be automated, but when i run the automation it prompts me to click dont save which it shouldnt do. i cant sit at the cpu and click dont save for thousands of images. whts the point of automation if i have to actually do something. stupid program. and i can clearly see in the list of actions tht it recorded me clicking dont save yet it still prompts me every time. i really do hate cs6. i wld install my old photoshop but b/c i have lion it doesnt support it... of course.. *rolls eyes*

    @conroy - one of the actions means one task in an action (see screen shot).
    @noel - i am able to run my action properly when i "play selection", but when i try to run a batch of images through the "automate" function is when the issues begin to arise. at least most of the issues.
    i would insert an image to show what i did, but i cant seem to get that to work (on my pc or mac... weird).  i loaded it to my fbook page and u can view it by following the below link
    https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=750482081505&l=4d1bb044bd
    you can view an image of what i did here.
    so in detail what i am trying to do is:
    record an action of the edits i make to a raw image so i can then run that same action on a batch of thousands of images via "automate."  the specific tasks i am trying to complete during my action should be visble in the link i provided. to explain in detail what is occuring that is being recorded as an action:
    1)- i press begin record
    2)- I am open a raw image
    3)- there is a time stamp in the image and i select and copy the time stamp from the corner of the image
    4)- i then open a new document and past the time stamp into the new document
    5)- i then increase the size of the pasted time stamp by about 3x by changing the resolution
    6)- i then go back to original image
    7)- i crop the original image to exclude the time stamp and other superflous things on the edges of the image
    8)- i then rotate the original image 90 degrees CCW
    9)- i then go back to the new document w/ the time stamp and select the time stamp with the marquee tool, so I can copy the time stamp to the original image
    10)- i copy and paste the time stamp to the original image, i use the "move tool" and move the time stamp to the top of the original image.
    11)- i then flatten the original image (i thought when this was done this is essentially combining layers, so there should be no possibility of the edited time stamp moving around as it has been flattened onto the original image)
    12)- i then save the original image (that was flattened w/ the edited time stamp) as a .jpeg  As part of the save process i also select the resolution.
    ***issue***
    so i am now having an issue on this section as well.  as you can see in the link i provided i have told adobe to do all this, yet now at this section it prompts me to make a decision about the resolution (i.e. press "ok").
    13) -after this step i then select "close all" from the file menu which closes the original image that i just saved and prompts me if i want to save the new document i created for the time stamp i edited
    14) - i select "dont save"
    15) -i press stop record
    16) - i then go to the folder where i saved the file i just edited in photoshop and change the name.
    17) - i start the action process to see if i can replicate the manual actions i just completed through automation.  i have no issues replicating this when i manually start the action, except for my issue w/ the time stamp detailed below.
    ***issue*****
    when i do this the time stamp that i edited and pasted back into the image is not in the same place. i have only gotten it to be in the same place once, and the only thing i did differently was continually re-create the above action in the same manner.  each time i recreated the action the time stamp was in a different place and one time it was finally in the place i moved it to.
    18) - after checking that the action works, i then attempt to automate a batch of files
    19) - i select file -> automate -> batch
    20) - in batch i choose the folder with the original raw images that i now want to run the action on and also select the folder where to place the altered images
    21) - in the batch menu i do not have any of the boxes checked (i.e. suppress color profile warnings, etc.)
    22) - i select "ok" and the automation process starts
    this is where i run into issues.  originally i would get prompted @ step 14 (above) instead of the automation process just reading the task in the action that says select "dont save". somehow i do not get prompted there anymore. now i get prompted at step 12.  it saves its as jpeg, but instead of completing the save process, at the resolution screen it prompts me to select "ok" instead of reading the task in the action that says select "ok"
    i have created new actions for the images i collect since CS4 and CS5 and i have never run into any of the issues i have described above. i appreciate any and all help you can provide, as it currently stands i am pretty upset b/c i have wasted an entire day or productivity messing w/ what appears to be a buggy program.

  • How to separately control color and luminescence noise reduction?

    Most of the time a little bit of Chroma noise reduction is all I need. I don't want to degrade the sharpness by applying luminescence blur unless I have to. Lightroom 3 has separate sliders. Is there a way to do this in Aperture 3?

    What code do you already have for changing the color and the number of elements?  Whatever it is you need to somehow tie that to being able to control it with a slider.  Would this be one slider to control both properties, or a different slider dedicated to each?

  • Photos with noise reduction filters applied shows too much noise in preview mode

    The Noise Reduction filters do an impressive job in Lightroom, but the preview of photos when zoomed out is sometimes poor.
    This becomes especially visible on photos with a high amount of noise reduction applied.
    When zooming in to 1:1 I see that the noise reduction works as it should. Also when exporting the images the noise is removed as it should.
    I wish the non-zoomed preview inside Lightroom was able to show the image with the noise reduction applied more correctly than in version 3.4.
    I'm using Lightroom 3.4 64-bit in Windows 7.
    See samples of image with heavy noise reduction applied in 1:1 screen shot, and then a unzoomed screen shot of the same part of the image. As you can see the unzoomed preview contains much more noise than the zoomed image does.

    I've had to encode with no noise reduction which is a shame, but have to get this DVD done.
    Any ideas for the next one?
    Thanks
    Mark

  • Adjustment brush with exposure setting cancels noise reduction

    Hello,
    I just noticed the following problem:
    1) Camera Raw 6.5; Bridge CS5 (4.0.5.11); Mac OS X 10.6.8; Mac Pro 3,1; Dual Quad-Core Xeon; 8GB RAM.
    2) Start with a noisy raw file (mine is from a Canon 5D II).
    3) Apply Noise Reduction (Luminance:30; Lum Detail:75; Lum Contrast:0; Color:25; Color Detail:50).
    4) Go to Adjustment Brush and set a non-zero Exposure value.
    5) Apply brush to image and notice the Noise Reduction effects disappear (noise returns).
    6) Click Clear All button to clear Adjustment Brush and Noise Reduction works again.
    This seems to only happen with Adjustment Brushes with a non-zero Exposure value (applying brightness or other settings don't seem to produce the problem).
    Anyone else seeing this?
    Thanks!

    Richard (and others),
    Yes, very good idea to check that. The problem does indeed get applied to the full sized, opened image as well as to the display previews. After working with this more, I now notice that I was wrong to say that the entire noise reduction is cancelled - rather it "changes", sometimes subtly, sometimes more dramatically depending on what the noise reduction settings are set to. Further, how dramatic the "changes" appear depend greatly on the preview zoom (the changes are more subtle at 100%, but it can look like the noise reduction is completely turned off at 50% and 66%).
    Now I realize that the noise reduction does not ordinarily display at all preview sizes (especially smaller ones), but this is different. At preview sizes where it does normally get applied, applying an adjustment brush with any non-zero exposure value (even just +0.05) can have the appearance that the NR is completely turned off for the whole image. Simply nudging the exposure value back to zero brings all the noise reduction back.
    Also, to be clearer and avoid confusion for others, the change in noise I'm seeing is not localized to just the brushed spot. Obviously if one increases exposure, you'd expect to potentially see more noise. Instead, what I'm seeing happens to the entire image, even if I simply paint a single small brush dot, say in a far corner. Having the image change globally in response to painting a small spot with the adjustment brush cannot be a correct result. Further, this does not happen with any of the other adjustment brush settings like brightness, contrast or saturation. There must be something unique about the exposure setting that perhaps introduces a new step into the processing pipeline, and this step is affecting the entire image.
    In any case, the problem only seems to be an issue in somewhat extreme cases and is less noticeable at 100% (and the finally opened image). It's more just annoying when previews are generated for viewing in Bridge, for example.
    I suppose one alternative might be to rob a bank and go buy one of those new 1D X's. Then maybe I wouldn't have to worry about noise anymore.
    Thanks for the responses!

  • Noise Reduction Export

    I used noise reduction on a clip with a fade in, but when I export the noise reduction doesn't kick in for the first second of audio. Does this have something to do with doing a fade in?

    I'm having the same problem...in Premiere, when I play through the timeline, the noise reduction is applied very effectively to every clip.  You never hear the background noise.  However, when I export and playback in QuickTime, every time a new audio segment begins in the video, the first few seconds play the original, unaltered audio (with no noise reduction), then suddenly the noise reduction kicks in and audio sounds good.
    Here is a export that demonstrates the problem pretty well:  https://vimeo.com/47687525
    I'm just now making the switch from Final Cut to Premiere so I don't even know where to start troubleshooting!  Surely this is not the way the noise reduction effect is supposed to function in Premiere...there's got to be a fix without using Audition.
    Any ideas?

  • PV2010 Color Noise Reduction Robs Dark Tones

    No pun intended.
    I thought at first it was the raw-conversion/de-mosaicing, but its turned out to be the color noise reduction.
    Here is a the latest example of a picture that looks better in PV2003 than PV2010 no matter what I do, because of loss of clarity / contrast / dark-tones resulting from the new Color Noise Reduction algorithm. Note: This loss can not be restored using clarity or contrast sliders.
    This probably ought to be a feature request: A slider that controls the coarser aspects of color noise reduction (color waves or clarity/contrast) versus the most localized aspects (color specs). In this instance, just getting rid of the specs without trying to reduce the waves might leave the dark tones(?) - Something like that. In any case, there is room to improve color noise reduction so that it leaves the dark tones / contrast / clarity in certain cases like this.
    (Its a 100% crop of a section of a fish under water)
    PV2003:
    PV2010:
    The difference is striking when viewing the whole photo from afar...
    PS - I just discovered that minimizing noise reduction will maintain the dark tones better - I've therefore added down-throttling of color noise reduction to my PV2003  -> PV2010 practice.
    Rob

    dorin_nicolaescu wrote:
    Luminosity Contrast slider also helps maintain some darker tones.
    Indeed it do.
    And, last but maybe (or maybe not) least, one can cheat a bit at the end and add some grain, to give the illusion of greater detail / texture. So, if you really want to preserve full detail when converting high ISO shots from PV2003 to PV2010, you need to:
    1. Crank up the luminance noise reduction detail slider pretty darn high (if not all the way up).
    2. Crank up the luminance noise reduction contrast slider pretty darn high (if not all the way up).
    3. Minimize color noise reduction amount.
    4. Crank up the color noise reduction detail slider fairly darn high (not all the way up! - color artefacts - bleh).
    5. Maybe add a touch of grain (pretty darn low).
    (I've left out the luminance NR amount slider and sharpening because they are the more obvious ones).
    I'm guessing I'm not the first person to fall into the trap of trying to recover detail lost by noise reduction by decreasing luminance noise reduction amount and increasing sharpening detail (and maybe amount too), and winding up right back where you started - too much noise. The detail/contrast sliders of the noise reduction controls really work a lot better for that, and minimizing color noise reduction is also a hot tip for you detail junkies.
    I hope I'm not the last person on this forum to realize what is now seeming sort of obvious to me, whilst everyone has a good laugh...
    (I had previous just left color noise reduction and detail, plus luminance NR contrast at their defaults (I discovered the importance of the lum.NR detail slider long ago...) - but not anymore. It has helped me to articulate all this - hope it helps somebody else too..........
    Rob

  • Very neat algorithm for noise reduction for high ISO

    I thought of this algorithm for the suppression of parasitic points occurring at high ISO
    ISO 6400
    before
    http://i053.radikal.ru/1009/26/ba1c56f4837b.jpg
    after
    http://s56.radikal.ru/i153/1009/73/ffcdcd185821.jpg
    Operation for photoshop, but for the Russian version and the English version must rename the layers ...
    http://rapidshare.com/files/417172652/Noise15.atn
    P.S.
    Maybe it will help you to further improve noise reduction algorithms

    Hi travojed !
    Thank you for your message
    I came to the conclusion that the high level "Median" (or "Dust&Scratches") destroys parts in this algorithm.
    And it seemed to me that the best result (when the contours remain sharp) will be if, instead of a "median" using the Topaz Denoize (Raw-moderate), because Topaz protects the sharp contours in this algorithm.
    Example (at full resolution - copy the address into a separate window)
    (RAW 6400)
    before
    http://s57.radikal.ru/i157/1009/73/ec1fbac57a83.jpg
    after
    http://s43.radikal.ru/i101/1009/fd/c30219adfc74.jpg
    P.S.
    I do not recommend using a constant value "Threshold" because at different values of the ISO get different noises
    travojed If you give me your example of a noisy image, I can see how best to remove the noise

  • Noise reduction makes robotic voice

    I have been using Noise Reduction feature on "Audition" with no problems. When I have upgraded to "Adobe Soundbooth" I have an issue with this feature. When I turn it on I hear robotic echo of the voice no matter what the parameters are, even if the slider of parameters is on the 0 point (no noise reduction at all). Furthermore, it makes no difference if I am doing it with noise reduction profile or not.

    I tried using noise reduction for old recordings namely background hiss...then I discovered the audio effects work better for this...called "remove hiss" and also in the simple effects "Parametric" called "Under a blanket"

  • Recovery connected to noise reduction rendering

    Just noticed when I crank the recovery slider up (ACR 4.4 Profile), Lightroom stops rendering fit view with color noise reduction applied when I get to 55 in the develop module. i.e. at recovery of 55 and greater, no color noise reduction is applied, 54 and below, color noise reduction is applied.
    Not sure what to say about it - just an interesting observation for the hyper-inquisitive...
    R

    Yeah, it does tend to dull a photo, however with ACR 4.4 (a linear profile) it can be cranked all the way to 100 without screwing up the hues, and I often crank it all the way up as a test and then lower to taste... - that's when I noticed the unexpected connection with the color noise reduction.
    PS - I sometimes use recovery to recover highlights (and dim the light tones as side effect), then use the tone curve to brighten the light tones back up.
    Summary:
    - With ACR 4.4, I feel free to use recovery 0-100 - often in conjunction with the tone curve to compensate for side-effect repression of non-highlight tones. With non-linear profiles, I strive for highlight-recovery=0 in most photos, due to unfavorable hue shifting.
    - For some reason, Highlight Recovery amount is affecting Lightroom's decision about whether to render color NR in the fit view.
    Cheers,
    Rob

Maybe you are looking for