IPS and native IPv6

I would like to know what IDS/IPS feature or appliance is compatible with a native IPv6 network.
Thanks in advance for your help.

The Cisco IPS has the atomic IPv6 engine which is currently limited to about 7 signatures.
Cisco IPS is also able to montor IPv4 packets tunneled inside of IPv6 packets.
So with current versions the support of native IPv6 monitoring is limited.
You would need to contact your Cisco Sale Representative for any information about future IPS versions and support for IPv6.

Similar Messages

How do I configure ISP native IPv6 connectivity?

Hi!
I'm a network engineer for SECOM, an ISP in Southeastern Colorado. We will be making native IPv6 connectivity available to residential subscribers soon, and I've been tasked with verifying support for our IPv6 platform on home router products.
I have an AirPort Extreme purchased new in November of '09 that is running version 7.5.1, which I believe is completely current.
Under the IPv6 tab in my Advanced settings, I have the following configuration:
IPv6 Mode: Router
Block incoming IPv6 connections: NOT checked
Configure IPv6: Manually
WAN IPv6 Address: fdXX:XXXX:XXXX:a000::2
WAN IPv6 Prefix Length: 64
IPv6 Default Route: fdXX:XXXX:XXXX:a000::1
LAN IPv6 Address: fdXX:XXXX:XXXX:c000::1
(As you can see, I'm using ULA's for testing purposes, and I've replaced the global bits with X's for security.)
The problem is, if I plug a host into one of the LAN ports and assign it an address from the same /64 subnet (e.g. fdXX:XXXX:XXXX:c000::2), the host can't ping the Airport's assigned LAN address.
It can ping:
* the Airport's link-local IPv6 address, and
* the Airport's IPv4 192.168.x.x address
Also (and I'm gratified that this part is working), my CE router can ping the Airport's WAN IPv6 address!
So my question is, is there something in the IPv6 configuration I'm misunderstanding? Has anyone else gotten native statically-configured IPv6 working on the AirPort Extreme?
Thanks very much in advance,
John E. / SECOM
P.S. - I have verified with a packet capture that the AirPort extreme is not responding at all for the configured LAN IPv6 address; i.e., the ICMPv6 neighbor solicitation goes unanswered.
P.P.S. - I have tried a Windows 7 host, a Windows XP host, and an IPv6-certified multitester from JDSU. All exhibit the same symptoms.

I have follow your instruction to connect to my ISP as it shows the following message:
Serial connection established.
using interface sppp0
connect: sppp0 <--> /dev/ttya
local IP address xxxxxxxx
remote IP address 1.1.1.1
But when I ping www.sun.com, it shows:
www.sun.com unknown.
I start Mozilla and it said www.sun.com not found etc...
What has gone wrong?
Do I have to configure some files such as:
/etc/resolv.conf
/etc/hosts
/etc/hostname ?
or any other steps that can help me to connect to the internet?
Thanks...

DirectAccess - IPHTTPS Tunnel with native IPv6 client

I observed that in a DirectAccess KerbProxy scenario, a Windows 8.1 DirectAccess client with native IPv6 Internet connectivity is still using the IP-HTTPS transition technology for connecting to a Windows 2012R2 DirectAccess server also with native IPv6
Internet connectivity.
Is this normal behavior, even when native IPv6 Internet connectivity is available?
Note 1: the use of the IP-HTTPS transition technology is confirmed with a Wireshark/NetMon trace.
Note 2: see also the related thread
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/e4bbb30e-161a-4847-918d-ba34934b4877/directaccess-double-dns-registration-issue-with-native-ipv6-client?forum=winserverNIS
Regards,
Stefaan

After some more research I found the Technet article
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee844198(v=WS.10).aspx. If that's still valid then no IPHTTPS should be used at all as both the DA client and the DA server have a public IPv6 address and can reach each other.
DA Client:
   Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller
   Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 9C-B6-54-EF-D9-37
   DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
   Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
   IPv6 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 2a02:a010:1:12::10(Preferred)
   Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::75df:2d9e:9fa6:a730%3(Preferred)
   IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 172.29.0.16(Preferred)
   Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.240.0
   Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 2a02:a010:1:12::1
                                       172.29.0.1
   DHCPv6 IAID . . . . . . . . . . . : 60601940
   DHCPv6 Client DUID. . . . . . . . : 00-01-00-01-1B-74-91-FD-9C-B6-54-EF-D9-37
   DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 195.238.2.21
                                       195.238.2.22
   NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled
DA Server:
   Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : vmxnet3 Ethernet Adapter #2
   Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-50-56-87-24-4C
   DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
   Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
   IPv6 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 2a02:a010:1:20::203(Preferred)
   Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::7960:e687:d4f3:4bf6%18(Preferred)
   IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 193.75.143.203(Preferred)
   Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
   Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 2a02:a010:1:20::21
                                       193.75.143.21
   DHCPv6 IAID . . . . . . . . . . . : 520114262
   DHCPv6 Client DUID. . . . . . . . : 00-01-00-01-1B-39-9F-8F-00-50-56-87-31-60
   DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : fec0:0:0:ffff::1%1
                                       fec0:0:0:ffff::2%1
                                       fec0:0:0:ffff::3%1
   NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Disabled
Also, why do we see in the "DirectAccess Policy-DaServerToCorpSimplified" as "Local Tunnel Endpoint" on the DA Server and as "Remote Tunnel Endpoint" on the DA Client the IPv6 address 2002:c14b:8fcb::c14b:8fcb ? That's the "Tunnel adapter 6TO4 Adapter"
of the DA Server. Shouldn't that be the IPv6 address 2a02:a010:1:20::203 in our case?
Regards,
Stefaan

Airport extreme with native IPV6

My isp free.fr provide IPV6 native
In automatic tunnel mode AEBS provide 6to4 IPV6 mode
I tried to change in manuel mode with this set up
Remote IPv4 Address: my ipv4 wan address
Remote IPv6 Address: 2a01:0e35:xxxx:xxxx::1
Local IPv6 Address: 2a01:0e35:xxxx:xxxx::2
LAN IPv6 Address: 2a01:0e35:yyyy:yyyy::1
Reboot
Local IPv6 Address of my AEX has been discovered;
Octet 3 and 4 have been discovered too for Remote IPv6 Address and LAN IPv6 Address
ping6 and traceroute6 to AEX: OK
but
IPV6 on my network doesn't work.
Any idea ?
Is my setup wrong or is there a AEBS bug in IPV6 mode ?
PS: for free users i swithed off routing mode of my freebox

I'd be interested to know if it's possible to use the AEX with an ISP that provides IPv6 native. But I would think that in such a case, you shouldn't configure it in 6to4 tunnel mode (either automatic or manual). There are two other options besides "tunnel". One is "link-local only", doesn't sound promising. The other option is "node". Did you try that? Just a wild guess.
Bonne chance!

Native Ipv6 Routing

Hi All,
I'm one of the few people who have a native IPv6 on his router but i would like to use it on all my devices on the network.
To start with I will write a small topology of my network:
(IPv4 and IPv6 Connected) -- Fritzbox 7340 - (10.0.1.1) ----- (10.0.1.2) (Airport Extreme 2007) (10.0.0.1) ----- (10.0.0.x range for home network)
When i connect my Mac directly to my Fritzbox i will get a IPv6 adres and am on the IPv6 as well as IPv4 internet
But i would like to connect to my airport instaid of directly on my router.
What u tried was : Advanced -> IPv6 -> Mode = Host and Configure ipv6 = Automatic, which was a no joy.
No mac is receiving a ipv6 adres and am not able to see which ipv6 is configured for my airport.
Then i tried Advanced -> IPv6 -> Mode = Host and Configure ipv6 = Manual,
Wan IP = 2001:My:Range::10 (which i made up)
IPV6 Default Route = 2001:My:Range::1 (which is the same as my router but is on "the other side")
Wan ipv6 prefix length = 48 ( because my range is 2001:My:Range::/48)
What am i doing wrong?

I was hoping to get some anwsers before I go buy a switch.
When you write page 183, I assume you're referring to page 173:
What's confusing is that for ipv4, the document has seperate sections for configuring ipv4 in layer 2 and layer 3 modes. Also, the doc clearly states this routing between vlan is supported in layer 3 mode:
Operating in Layer 3 mode, the switch routes traffic between the directly attached
IP subnets configured at the switch. The switch continues to bridge traffic
between devices in the same VLAN. Additional IPv4 routes for routing to non-
directly attached subnets can be configured in the IP Static Routing Page.
But for ipv6, there's only one section for layer and layer 3, and then there's this:
• IPv6 Address—The switch supports one IPv6 interface. In additional to the
default link local and multicast addresses, the device also automatically
adds global addresses to the interface based on the router advertisements
it receives. The device supports a maximum of 128 addresses at the
interface. Each address must be a valid IPv6 address that is specified in
hexadecimal format by using 16-bit values separated by colons.
Also,t here's no explicting mention of routing between the vlans for ipv6.

Native IPv6 with Airport stops working

Hi!
My ISP has just started supporting native IPv6, which I would like to get working with my Airport Extreme as router.
After configuring the Airport in Router mode (AU 5.6), with automatic configuration, my router and all my devices are in fact configured with an IPv6 address.
However, now the weird problem starts:
After configuring the airport, it reboots, my devices receive an address, and IPv6 works!
....for about 10 seconds. During these 10 seconds, ping6 and telnet/browser to IPv6 addresses respond and work.
However, after about 10 seconds, ping stops responding, and new connections time out.
If I connect my computer directly to the cable modem, IPv6 works flawlessly.
I can also see the IPv6 router advertisement, where I receive a /64 network delegation.
I also know other users of the same ISP who have got this working fine with other routers.
Are there any known problems with the Airport Extreme with IPv6 in native mode?

jvbrandis wrote:
that is kind of a circular argument, isn't it? Unless people start using IPv6, the usage will not become any higher...
I was speaking of ISP's use of IPv6 when I cited only 1%. For users who's ISP's have not implemented it yet, they won't be able to use it.
I for one would like to perform some testing from my home environment, and if the Airport Express is not able to function as an IPv6 router, I will need to replace it with a devices that works.
Again, as far as I know it does, but in order to use it in your home environment, won't your ISP have to have implemented it natively as well (I know you said they did).
Btw; I have been using the Aiport Express in tunnel mode, which seems to work just fine (but has very bad performance, due to the 6to4 tunneling).
So perhaps your ISP only provides 6to4 tunneling when they said they implemented it. I know that has occurred in some Comcast areas. Perhaps a call to your ISP for some details is in order.

Reporting Services in both SharePoint 2013 connected and native mode?

Is it possible to configure Reporting Services (SQL Server 2014) to support both SharePoint 2013 connected mode and local Report Server in native mode on the same server using multiple instances of RS? The reason for this setup is to avoid having to purchase
SharePoint Enterprise CALs for other users than analysts and still be able to publish standard reports to all employees.
Management and analysts -> Custom reports published through SharePoint 2013 Enterprise (SP2013 ECALs and SQL Server 2014 core license). Data alerts and Power View enabled if possible.
All employees -> Standard reports published through Native Mode Report Server (SQL Server 2014 core license). Possible subscriptions.
I find the official documentation a bit lacking in this area but can't find anything stating against the above. It would be greatly appreciated if someone could confirm before planning the installs.
What I'm aiming for is somewhat similar to the "2 Tier Topology" described at: Example
License Topologies and Costs for SQL Server 2014 Self-Service Business Intelligence
With the difference that there is a separate SQL Server 2014 server used both by SharePoint and as a standalone BI-server.
SharePoint EE + SQL Server 2014 EE
Excel Services
SSRS Add-in (Reporting Services, Power View)
SQL Server DB for SP Content, Configuration and Service Application DB:s
SQL Server 2014 EE - SharePoint + Standalone for BI
SSRS SharePoint Mode
SSRS Native Mode
SSAS (Not in SharePoint mode, skipping PowerPivot for now. Would Power View still work?)
SQL Server DB for Data Warehouse
= 1 x SharePoint EE Server Licence, 2 x SQL Server 2014 EE Server Licenses?
Deployment
Topologies for SQL Server BI Features in SharePoint - Actually gives a good overview in the section "PowerPivot for SharePoint
2013 and Reporting Services Three Server Deployment". Just remove PowerPivot Service from Server 1 and change the Analysis Services in Server 2 to a regular native multidimensional mode. Server 2 would also be used for native Reporting Services.
Fallback or even beneficial option to install SSRS in SharePoint mode on the SQL Server instance used for content and configuration?

Hi Daniel Wikar,
As per my understanding, you want to install two SQL Server instances on the same server, and configure one of the Reporting Services to SharePoint integrated mode, another to native mode.
According to my knowledge, multiple instances of Reporting Services on the same computer, where one instance runs in SharePoint integrated mode and the other instance runs in native mode is supported. But we must run all report server instances at the same
level. For example, if we are using SQL Server 2014, all report server instances must be SQL Server 2014.
Besides, Analysis Services and Reporting Services can be installed as standalone servers, in scale-out configurations, or as shared service applications in a SharePoint farm. Installing the services in a farm enables BI features that are only available in
SharePoint, including PowerPivot for SharePoint and Power View.
For more information about Feature Comparison of SharePoint and Native Mode and Supported and Unsupported Configurations, please refer to the following documents:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms157231.aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-US/library/bb510781(v=SQL.105).aspx
For detailed information regarding to the license issue, please call
1-800-426-9400,
Monday through Friday, 6:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. (Pacific Time) to speak directly to a Microsoft licensing specialist. For international customers, please use the Guide to Worldwide Microsoft Licensing Sites to find contact information in your locations.
You can also visit the following site for more information and support on licensing issues:
http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/mla/default.aspx
If you have any more questions, please feel free to ask.
Thanks,
Wendy Fu
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here.

Mtune generic and native

I've had "-mtune=generic" in my makepkg.conf file since I upgraded GCC a few weeks ago. Why? Because I read it is a good idea. I really don't understand the scope of it. Now today with my newest Pacman upgrade, it mentions adding "-mtune=native". So here's my question:
What do these things do and should they be run together?
Hmmm. I guess my question answered itself. Generic is for if you plan to share your builds, and native is for your own local builds. Correct?
Last edited by skottish (2007-06-05 01:21:53)

Yeah, the GCC docs are a bit unclear about this part in my opinion. I've been doing some research about this too, and I've found some reactions from people who are certain this is added automatically as well as people telling you still have to add it your own. So I can't really help you on this. The only thing I can say is I add the -msse and -m3dnow (I have an athlon XP) flag because I'm not sure the -mtune=native flag is adding it by default and either way it's not bad to add it yourself.
But if someone could give a clear explanation it would be nice, I do understand skottish's questions about it being somewhat unclear

About IPS and its working

i want to know in detail about IPS and its working.Also is it using artificial intelligent or neural network for self upgrading reason.

No, the sensors are not intelligent. They will very happily sit there dumb until updated manually.

The JNI defines a mapping of Java types and native (C/C++) types.

As per the tutorial
The JNI defines a mapping of Java types and native (C/C++) types.Does the above sentence mean that I can use dll written in C/C++ only and not dll written in Pearl.
Could anyone please give me the solution.

Please do tell me how can I call a dll file created in Perl ....And I will point out again that I doubt that it is possible to create a dll that has the following characteristics
1. Is in fact a dll.
2. Is in fact intended to run anywhere outside of the perl engine.
Step 2 means that you run perl, not a "perl dll" via C.
You can do that or at least in the past you could. And that has nothing to do with java nor JNI. So you would learn about it on a perl site.
And I can only note that when I did that a number of years ago it was very difficult. Certainly much harder than getting JNI to work. And you had better have quite a bit of C/C++ experience before you attempt it.

Dynamic Range and Native ISO information

I manage the mobile app "Formats" (https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/formats/id890528993?mt=8), and I'm looking to find information on a number of Canon camcorders. In particular, I'm trying to verify the dynamic range and native ISO of the following cameras: XF100XF200XF300 I called Canon customer service and was told they "dont publish that infromation". Can anyone help me? Thanks!

zakray wrote:
I manage the mobile app "Formats" (https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/formats/id890528993?mt=8), and I'm looking to find information on a number of Canon DSLRs. In particular, I'm trying to verify the dynamic range and native ISO of the following cameras: 5D Mk II5D Mk III6D7DT5i I called Canon customer service and was told they "dont publish that infromation". Can anyone help me? Thanks!Dynamic range varies depending on the definition used.You might want to check clarkvision.com.

Dot1q-tunneling and native frames ( untagged )

hi all I have the following setup:
tunnel Port:
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/2
switchport access vlan 784
switchport mode dot1q-tunnel
switchport nonegotiate
l2protocol-tunnel cdp
l2protocol-tunnel stp
l2protocol-tunnel vtp
no cdp enable
spanning-tree portfast
Trunk Port - Into Carrier Network
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/25
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk native vlan 4094
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
load-interval 30
speed nonegotiate
spanning-tree bpdufilter enable
the Native Port on the tunnel interface = 1 and native vlan tagging is enabled on the switch.
what happens to untagged frames that hit the tunnel port from the customer? Imagine that they dont have their port as a trunk and are instead emitting untagged frames?
are these dropped or simply have a single Q-tag pushed and are then tunnelled through the carrier network?
I have followed the recommendation of making the trunk port have a native vlan that is not the native vlan of any of the tunnel ports.
thanks

Normally double-tag traffic is seen as NON-IP traffic by metro devices, since they cannot see beyond first tag.
Untagged customer traffic will behave like IP traffic in metro network, since it will have only one tag.
You can use a trick - create an IP access list on trunk port with "deny ip any any" - basically denying all IP traffic. That should stop all traffic that was not tagged by the customer. Ofcourse that will disable your management - so you need to plan this.
If more than one customer is using same S-VLAN, and one customer has e.g. VLAN 3 untagged, and other one has VLAN 5 untagged, their VLANs will be interconnected.

Comparing the ROI of Content Marketing and Native Advertising

Sharing an interesting article on the topic here: https://hbr.org/2015/07/comparing-the-roi-of-content-marketing-and-native-advertising?utm_source=twi...
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

Sharing an interesting article on the topic here: https://hbr.org/2015/07/comparing-the-roi-of-content-marketing-and-native-advertising?utm_source=twi...
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

Can IPS and AntiBot work in Active - Active Mode

Hi,
When we propose two firewalls in Active - Active mode with IPS module and Anti-Bot Licences, will the firewall along with IPS and Anti-Bot work in Active - Active mode? If not, how do the other OEM's claim that they are able to run their UTM in Active- Actvie Mode.

Hi,
I haven't seen any type of limitation with IPS and Botnet Traffic filtering on Multiple context mode; so it should work fine.
Luis

IPS and IDS- ARP Inbalance-of-Requests and TCP High Port Sweep

Does anybody knows about ARP Inbalance-of-Requests and TCP High Port Sweep IPS signature? We've been receiving numerous numbers of alerts with this kind of signature in the IPS.
Actually, I'm planning to tune these events in IPS and I really need your inputs if it is safe to tune. Based on my investigation, most of the source and destination IP's are internal to our network (e.g servers, workstation and other device).
I think this is false positive incidents...
Best regards,
Carlou

This will be a normal signature to see triggered if you are watching outbound traffic from your internal network. As long as the source of the traffic is your internal hosts, and the destination is external hosts, this is likely just normal behavior.
This signature triggers when a single host sends TCP SYN packets to a number of different hosts, perhaps because of multiple web sessions going, or pop-up windows while web surfing.
Check this bug-id:CSCsh94361

IPS and native IPv6

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for