IPv6 support for sx300 series?

Hi all,
I'm wondering if we are going to be seeing some better IPv6 support on these switches? Maybe even some static IPv6 routing?
Thanks.

Apparently it's on the roadmap for 2012, so with a bit of luck we'll see it some time then:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2113913
Oh, whoops, it's already 2013! 
Seriously though, an update on where this feature request got to would be appreciated - is there anyone at Cisco who can give us an update?.  Perhaps there's a version 8.0 of software for these phones about to be released with new support or something?  v7 has been out there a while now.

Similar Messages

  • IPv6 support for oci

    Hi,
    I am using oci.dll 10.1.0.4. I would like to know whether it supports IPv6?
    In all forums related to IPv6 support for oci I find it redirected to IPv6 support Oracle database 9i and 10g (which do not support IPv6), but my question is whether the interface library support IPv6?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Richa

    No, there is no support for IPv6 in any part of 10g; you need at least 11.1.0.6. See Meatlink Note 579222.1.

  • AVC support for 3500 Series AP on 5760 platform

    Hi all,
    The title says it all. According to the 5760 Configuring Application Visibility and Control guide only the following AP types are supported
    Cisco Aironet 1600 Series Access Points
    Cisco Aironet 2600 Series Wireless Access Points
    Cisco Aironet 3600 Series Access Points
    What about the 3500 Series? Is it not (yet) supported? They are still relatively new and AVC works on AireOS based WLCs.
    Had not yet the chance to do a test myself, so I am asking here.
    Regards,
    Patrick

    Hi Patrick,
    Here is the latest AVC guide for 5760. Only addition was 3700 to the list of 1600,2600 & 3600.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/docs/wireless/controller/technotes/5700/software/release/ios_xe_33/iosXE_3point3_AVC_DG.html
    So no support for 3500.
    I do not think Cisco will make it work as they want to discontinue 3500 series.
    HTH
    Rasika
    **** Pls rate all useful responses ****

  • IPv6 support for RV082

    Is there any IPv6 support planned or in the works for RV082?

    Latest version of RV0xx does support IPv6
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/csbr/rv0xx/administration/guide/rv0xx_AG_78-19576.pdf

  • Vss quad sup support for 4500 series

    Hi all
    I'm looking at at 4507r+e with dual supervisor 7
    I want to run vss, however does it support quad supervisors?
    I hear the second one will have to be in rommon?
    In a failover how would I get the 2nd supervisor working ?
    Would you need to manually boot it?

    Have a look at the config guide:
    Quad-Supervisor (In-chassis Standby Supervisor Engine) Support
    The Catalyst 4500 series switches support dual supervisors in a redundant chassis, which can be configured for SSO or RPR mode. However, when a chassis is running in VSS mode, it supports a second supervisor engine, but only in rommon mode. In-Chassis-Standby (ICS) can not participate in control, management, or forwarding plane functioning. This makes ports on the supervisor engine in rommon mode available for forwarding although it neither participates in any switchover nor provides protection against any failure. In VSS mode, an In-Chassis-Active (ICA) supervisor engine participates in VSS control/ management operation and manages ports on the supervisor engine in rommon mode.
    If the second supervisor engine is inserted in a redundant chassis, the following information applies:
    •It must also be manually configured for VSS mode, i.e., it must have been converted from standalone to VSS mode previously. If you insert a supervisor engine that was not configured for VSS mode, it will disrupt the operation of the ICA supervisor engine. If it was previously configured, automatic boot must be disabled (i.e., to boot only to ROM Monitor) with the confreg command in rommon.
    The supervisor engine does not takeover or boot automatically when the ICA supervisor engine fails. A manual boot up is required to make it participate in VSS; it then functions as an ICA supervisor engine.
    More details on rommon commands are found at this URL:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/15.1.2/XE_340/configuration/guide/rommon.html#wp1013959
    •A supervisor engine's conversion from standalone to VSS occurs per engine. If two supervisor engines exist in a chassis, one should be retained in rommon or removed, before conversion occurs. You can convert the second supervisor to VSS mode while the first supervisor is removed or in rommon, with the additional step of setting it to "boot only to ROM Monitor." When both engines are converted to VSS, they can be inserted into the chassis together and re-booted.
    •Booting a chassis with two supervisor engines configured for VSS causes one of the engines to become the ICA and participate in VSS. The other engine, which becomes the ICS, will continuously reload. The secondary supervisor (the ICS) must be configured to "boot only to ROM Monitor" with automatic boot disabled.
    •When the ICA fails, the ICS doesn't take over because ICS support of SSO or RPR mode is unavailable. ICS (the secondary supervisor) must be booted manually to become the ICA and manage the VSS operations. For this to happen, the former active supervisor engine must remain in rommon mode.
    •ISSU support requires ICA supervisor engines on both chassis. The ICS supervisor engine does not participate in upgrade or any forwarding operations.
    •Because ICS supervisor engines do not communicate with ICA supervisors, VSS and other configurations must be done at conversion time on the ICS. If not done or the configurations do not match the necessary VSS parameters (like, SwitchId, Domain, and VSL configurations), it cannot form a VSS when ICA goes down and ICS is booted manually. You can, however, enter these "bootup" commands to make it join an existing VSS domain.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/15.1.2/XE_340/configuration/guide/vss.html#wp1204229
    HTH

  • Sigma raw (x3f) support for Merrill series of cameras . . .

    Just wondering when and if Adobe is going to support it in camera raw. I've been a Photoshop user since version 2 or 3 - would really like to continue with it.
    Thanks and look forward to your response!

    Actually They do they use  a Converter that changes all Camera formats to DNG Format. That Photoshop actually can read. It works with all versions of Adobe Photoshop. The people from adobe claim  (When I wrote and asked why they simply couldn't use the Camera Raw system That Apple updates every month or two to add new Cameras) That NEF and the other format that Nikon, Cannon Sony are just something they just made up and are not legitimate file formats. (despite their being used by their respective companies for years.)
    Each new version of Photoshop comes with a new version of this converter built in. And in the the past Until they came out with their way over priced subscription service you had to upgrade to a new version of PS in order to use your new camera. I have to note that Lightroom4 apparently doesn't need the converter.(on Mac they evidently uses built in Apple's Raw Converter).
    Go to Adobe's website > support and put in search box DNG Converter. 

  • NIDAQmx Base Support for E-Series PCCARD?

    Hi all,
    are there any plans for supporting the PCCARD boards (as my DAQCARD 6062E) by NIDAQmx base for Linux in (near) future? I have built a measurement software in C++ combined with a Java surface that I also would like to test on Linux. It runs fine with MSWindows.
    Thanks
    Thorsten

    pkreitler wrotevi Maps can't look inside my own phone at the Contacts for an address.  So often I am looking for an address that is in my contacts.  It would be great if Ovi Maps could look up a contact.  Should be easy, right? 
    Try opening the contact you want in Contacts and then look in Options.

  • IPv6 support for Mail/Postfix

    After adding and enable an IPv6 address, how do I get xserver to start listening for ipv6 mail requests?
    Looking at the main.cf I see:
    inet_interfaces = all
    But running netstat -an | grep 25 I don't see tcp6?
    tcp4 0 0 *.25 . LISTEN
    Just to check sanity, I can ping it via ping6.
    And ssh is listening:
    tcp4 0 0 *.22 . LISTEN
    tcp6 0 0 *.22 . LISTEN
    Is there something more missing?

    You need to edit /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
    You need to change your listen command to the following:
    listen = *, [::]
    Please note that the above command needs to have brackets around the colons - for some reason the forum software is deleting them.
    Also, I found that not only did you have to change the listen command at the top of the configuration file but also change the listen command to the above within the IMAP and POP3 (I only edited the IMAP since I don't use POP3) specific configurations that are found further down in the file.

  • ACE module support for IPv6 ?

    what is the latest on IPv6 support for ACE module? I saw something saying 2HCY10, but that's where we are now. Any documentation pointers to current compatability and or roadmap are greatly appreciated.
    thanks
    Bob O.

    As mklemovitch described in the following thread, IPv6 will be
    supported on ACE30 module but not in the initial release.
    There is no plan for ACE20 module.
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3192517#3192517
    I'm not sure but maybe around Q3 CY11 or later.
    I cannot see the documentation regarding this feature on CCO.
    I would suggest to contact your account team for details.
    Regards,
    Yuji

  • E4200 IPV6 support (and the removal of it)

    Dear Linksys representatives,
    Could you please provide some detail on why IPv6 was available in the first builds of the router but then got removed in later firmware versions and the official lecture is that IPv6 is not being supported at all.
    I've had a nice little chat with one of your representatives and they could not clarify this at all. Actually, they say no Linksys devices EVER supported IPv6 period, which does not seem to be entirely true. Saw that 1.0.00 (build 13) for the e4200 actaully has IPv6 support in it and the current build has not.
    Could you also make a sticky post about IPv6 support on all Linksys devices with wether they will be supporting it in the future or not? Depending on the outcome to this question I'm deciding to return my Linksys device or not, since I actually need to have IPv6 support for development of new soft- and hardware.
    Kind regards,
    Michel
    ps: happy IPv6 day!
    http://www.worldipv6day.org/

    The E4200v1 and E4200v2 both support IPv6 in the latest firmware.  Do you still have a problem?  See also: http://home.cisco.com/ipv6 for a list of routers and the test suites that they have past.
    All future home routers are expected to have IPv6.

  • Cisco Prime LMS 4.x IPv6 support

    Is there a document that describles the IpV6 support for LMS?

    It's not documented in any one place that I have found.
    Joe Clarke covered it in a post a post early last year. See here.
    Per the release notes, I don't believe LMS 4.1 has changed that significantly.

  • BT Infinity IPv6 support

    Yes, its time for this question again - when are BT rolling out IPv6 support for residential subscribers?
    Esp. with only one /8 remaining at ARIN - https://twitter.com/TeamARIN/status/458955310086909954

    Or if the goal is just to connect to IPv6 addresses, then teredo is built into Windows:
    C:\Windows\system32>netsh int ipv6 set teredo client teredo.trex.fi
    Ok.
    C:\Windows\system32>ping -6 www.google.com
    Pinging www.google.com [2a00:1450:4009:808::1011] with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 2a00:1450:4009:808::1011: time=21ms
    Reply from 2a00:1450:4009:808::1011: time=29ms
    Reply from 2a00:1450:4009:808::1011: time=21ms
    Reply from 2a00:1450:4009:808::1011: time=21ms
    Ping statistics for 2a00:1450:4009:808::1011:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 21ms, Maximum = 29ms, Average = 23ms
    Oliver.

  • IPv6 Support Question

    I'm trying to run a small Android app which requires link-local IPv6 communication over a WiFi link. Unfortunately, my BB Z10 seems to ignore IPv6 settings of the network device.
    I have enabled IPv6 support for the WiFi link, but in the advanced network view I don't see any IPv6 address.
    Trying to use ping with IPv6 results in an error message showing the available command line options of the ping6 utility. Any suggestions how to get this work?
    My OS version is 10.2.1.2141.

    No. Usually the ISP will assign you an IPv6 prefix which you can use in your LAN. You will still need a router. More than ever. Only instead of assigning private IP addresses in your LAN you can assign public IP addresses to your devices, i.e. you don't need NAT anymore.
    Anything else would make networking much more complicated. Just image you have a few dozen random IPv6 assigned directly by your ISP (i.e. a few dozen active internet connections). The ISP must keep track of each IPv6 address. And for your LAN network you must also know what is in your LAN and what not. It could well be the the IPv6 address of your printer today is assigned to somebody else tomorrow..

  • IPv6 support on ME 3400 Series?

    Hello,
    I'm looking into deploying a couple ME-3400G-12CS-A metro ethernet switches in our network. All the features listed on data sheet look great, however IPv6 support appears to be missing.
    Assuming the ME 3400 series does not support IPv6, will IPv6 support be available in the future through a mean of software upgrade for ME 3400's product roadmap? Or will enablement of IPv6 require complete replacement of ME3400 series products with something else (i.e. for example, Cat3550's hardware TCAM could not support IPv6, thus cat3560 is the right platform to upgrade into for v6 support).
    Thanks in advance for any suggestion that you can provide.

    ME 3400 does not support IPv6 currently in software. But there is no such limitation in ME 3400 hardware. So you can expect that IPv6 may be supported in near future.

  • Does Aironet 1100/1120/1130 support for IPv6 ?

    Experts,
    I find much document, but not found information about whether those support for IPv6 e.g. dual-stack like newer series.
    Has anyone used to test on those?
    Thank you in advance for any info,
    Nipat.p

    Hi,
    When working with WLCs if you are running code 7.2 you will be able to support IPV6 but this code is only supported by the latest model of WLCs and the APs that are supported under this code.
    On previous WLCs models that support up to code 7.0, the WLC only handles IPV6 pass through after code 6.0 since it does not support native IPV6.

Maybe you are looking for