IPv6 Support Needed

I am bewildered to see that the first posting about the need for IPv6 support in Linksys routers was made in August of 2006.  It is now April 2010, and there is still very little (if any) support for IPv6 in Linksys routers.
In case nobody was paying attention--the IPv4 address space will be exhausted next year!  Heelloo--wake up!
We need robust IPv6 implementation support now if we're going to have our app's ready to go when there will be no alternative.

Comcast starts trial testing of IPv6 with customers in June.  It's time to stop putting it off and get IPv6 support into the firmware.

Similar Messages

  • IPv6 support in JDMK 4.2

    Hi,
    We are working on enhancing our product to support IPv6. Currently we are using JDMK 4.2 with JDK 1.5. Wanted to know if there is any information about JDMK 4.2 support for IPv6?
    1) Does it support binding using IPv6 interface
    2) Can it accept SNMP request over IPv6 and send traps over IPv6 interface?
    Or should we migrate our application to newer version of JDMK?
    Regards
    -murali

    There is IPv6 support in the ASA version 8.2.
    We just posted an IPv6 Quick Start guide at https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-15973 and would appreciate feedback on it.
    The Public Servers features is a NAT/PAT feature.  The good news is that the immense address space of IPv6 eliminates the need for NAT, you can just use use access lists to set up your policy.

  • IPv6 support in IOS

    hi,
    we have a Cisco 2851 router and bought the following IOS::
    System image file is "flash:c2800nm-spservicesk9-mz.124-25d.bin"
    Cisco IOS Software, 2800 Software (C2800NM-SPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.4(25d), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
    I thought this version was supposed to have IPv6 support?
    TEST(config)#ipv6 unicast-routing
                                  ^
    % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
    TEST(config)#
    which IOS should we buy?
    regards,
    Paal

    I think you need the IOS  advanced IP Services.
    Cheers,
    Eehab
    - Please rate the asnwers you find useful.

  • E4200 IPV6 support (and the removal of it)

    Dear Linksys representatives,
    Could you please provide some detail on why IPv6 was available in the first builds of the router but then got removed in later firmware versions and the official lecture is that IPv6 is not being supported at all.
    I've had a nice little chat with one of your representatives and they could not clarify this at all. Actually, they say no Linksys devices EVER supported IPv6 period, which does not seem to be entirely true. Saw that 1.0.00 (build 13) for the e4200 actaully has IPv6 support in it and the current build has not.
    Could you also make a sticky post about IPv6 support on all Linksys devices with wether they will be supporting it in the future or not? Depending on the outcome to this question I'm deciding to return my Linksys device or not, since I actually need to have IPv6 support for development of new soft- and hardware.
    Kind regards,
    Michel
    ps: happy IPv6 day!
    http://www.worldipv6day.org/

    The E4200v1 and E4200v2 both support IPv6 in the latest firmware.  Do you still have a problem?  See also: http://home.cisco.com/ipv6 for a list of routers and the test suites that they have past.
    All future home routers are expected to have IPv6.

  • LMS prime 4.2.5 IPV6 support

    I'm attempting to configure LMS 4.2.5 to perform IPV6 addressing for  polling and device management I need advice on how to proceed as I see very little documentation and I'm not seeing any options in the configuration web  GUI

    I've not had a chance to exercise the features, but there's a table in Chapter 1 of the LMS 4.2 Admin Guide in the section "IPv6 Support In LMS" that outlines exactly where you can use IPv6 device addresses across the various LMS functions.

  • IPV6 Support in Cisco IOS

    I am having a difficult time determining why on a 2811 running IOS c2800nm-advsecurityk9-mz.150-1.M2.bin,  the router won't accept ipv6 commands.  The feature set from what I can discern includes ipv6 support. However, I have received mixed views.  Does advsecurity image support ipv6 or do I need adv ip services image?               

    The philosophical direction of Cisco is to have full IPv4 and IPv6  parity across feature sets.  Any IPv4 feature should appear in the same  license level of software for IPv6.
    That said, some older software and platforms may have been missed.
    See
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/community/netpro/network-infrastructure/ipv6-transition/blog/2011/09/21/ipv6-feature-packaging-in-cisco-routers-and-switches
    See if the problem persists with the latest version.  If so, I'd treat it as a bug and open a case.

  • IPv6 support, ARD

    When is IPv6 support expected in Apple Remote Desktop?
    I recently had the need to connect to a Desktop via IPv6 and was prevented by the requirement for an address in the format 'x.x.x.x'.

    No idea, since we're all just fellow users here and Apple's said nothing. It's certainly been an issue that's been brought up with Apple a number of times, but no word about IPv6 support has come and I know of no one who's gotten it to work. You can express your need for this here, if you wish:
    http://www.apple.com/feedback/remotedesktop.html
    Regards.

  • IPv6 support for oci

    Hi,
    I am using oci.dll 10.1.0.4. I would like to know whether it supports IPv6?
    In all forums related to IPv6 support for oci I find it redirected to IPv6 support Oracle database 9i and 10g (which do not support IPv6), but my question is whether the interface library support IPv6?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Richa

    No, there is no support for IPv6 in any part of 10g; you need at least 11.1.0.6. See Meatlink Note 579222.1.

  • E3000 IPv6 Support

    I know that the E3000 does not have IPv6 support. I wanted to know if it will get a firmware update to support it?

    I doubt very much that in the beginning when you can get IPv6 to the end-customer you'll see much of configuration options anywhere. IPv6 allows auto-configuration in the LAN and that's most likely where it will go.
    And that's at least the way it goes in places where you can get IPv6 to the home now: No configuration options. Yet, you can use IPv6 through the router without tunneling.
    What you want is to use all the same old concepts of IPv4 on IPv6 plus the extended complications due to the fact that's it's a migration process and for years to come you'll see IPv4 and IPv6.
    You pay for a consumer device which is made for easy deployment. You dont' need to set up addressing in the LAN environment. It's automatic. You don't need to make decisions on usable address ranges, it's automatic. You don't need DHCP, it's automatic.
    And the moment the ISP gets IPv6 to your door you won't need any relays, tunnels or whatsoever which is a nightmare to begin with if you wanted to explain a average consumer user about all this and what to set up there. And I still don't like the idea of Microsoft simply setting up those tunnels for you in Windows if you enable IPv6 because noone explains to you that's it's a privacy nightmare as all your IPv6 traffic goes through those tunnels and (depending) through Microsoft servers.
    If you want a device which you want to set up in any you might want you should not get a consumer device made for ease of use, i.e. not being able to set up in any way YOU want but only to be able to set them up in a way that they are easily to use.

  • IPv6 Support Question

    I'm trying to run a small Android app which requires link-local IPv6 communication over a WiFi link. Unfortunately, my BB Z10 seems to ignore IPv6 settings of the network device.
    I have enabled IPv6 support for the WiFi link, but in the advanced network view I don't see any IPv6 address.
    Trying to use ping with IPv6 results in an error message showing the available command line options of the ping6 utility. Any suggestions how to get this work?
    My OS version is 10.2.1.2141.

    No. Usually the ISP will assign you an IPv6 prefix which you can use in your LAN. You will still need a router. More than ever. Only instead of assigning private IP addresses in your LAN you can assign public IP addresses to your devices, i.e. you don't need NAT anymore.
    Anything else would make networking much more complicated. Just image you have a few dozen random IPv6 assigned directly by your ISP (i.e. a few dozen active internet connections). The ISP must keep track of each IPv6 address. And for your LAN network you must also know what is in your LAN and what not. It could well be the the IPv6 address of your printer today is assigned to somebody else tomorrow..

  • Please share your IPv6 information needs.

    Are you implementing IPv6 in your network? Please share any of your IPv6 information needs here. Also share any comments you have on the IPv6 Knowledge Base Portal.

    Hi John
    If it's like previous years, you can register for as many sessions as you want, providing there are no clashes as you can't register for sessions that conflict or overlap with previosly booked sessions. It's always worth booking for those sessions that are of interest as some often fill and if you're not registered, you're forced to wait in a standby queue and might miss out entirely.
    I only know as much as you do now regarding when the schedule builder will finally be available in that it's due sometime in July (which doesn't have too many days remaining).
    Now my sessions will obviously fill quickly so make sure you book early or you might miss out ;)
    Cheers
    Richard Foote
    http://richardfoote.wordpress.com/

  • Question about Oracle10g Net Services'IPv6 Support

    I'm working in a network group which is studying the IPv6.Recently I installed oracle10g in the RedHat Linux-9(kernel-2.4.22,which supported the IPv4/IPv6 dual mode),but I can't configure the oracle10g in IPv6.
    I tried every method to find the solution,including read the oracle10g document,use the google,ask the support service,but there was no answer.And I can't login into the metlink to ask question because I didn't have the CSI number.
    So who can give me some advice about the configuration.Thank you very muck!

    I read the document before it was taken down a couple weeks ago. It said that IPv6 support would be introduced with Oracle11g and not back ported.
    Kind regards,
    Russ Cannon

  • What is the maximum number of ARP entries (IPv4) and ND entries (IPv6) supported in our controllers?

    Q: What is the maximum number of ARP entries (IPv4) and ND entries (IPv6) supported in Aruba controllers?
    A: The maximum number of static ARP entries supported is about 2048 for M3/72xx/70xx platforms.
    The maximum number of static ARP entries supported is about 128 for 6xx platforms.
    The maximum number of static ND entries supported is about 2048 for M3/72xx/70xx platforms.
    The maximum number of static ND entries supported is about 128 for 6xx platforms.

    a)It depends upon software level. b) 16,000 per card, With release 9.3:
    60K Connections Support on BXM-E—Provides the ability to support a maximum of 60K per card for VSI applications for the BPX 8600, for example, PNNI or MPLS, used on enhanced BXM-E cards.

  • IPv6 support for sx300 series?

    Hi all,
    I'm wondering if we are going to be seeing some better IPv6 support on these switches? Maybe even some static IPv6 routing?
    Thanks.

    Apparently it's on the roadmap for 2012, so with a bit of luck we'll see it some time then:
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2113913
    Oh, whoops, it's already 2013! 
    Seriously though, an update on where this feature request got to would be appreciated - is there anyone at Cisco who can give us an update?.  Perhaps there's a version 8.0 of software for these phones about to be released with new support or something?  v7 has been out there a while now.

  • IPv6 support on ME 3400 Series?

    Hello,
    I'm looking into deploying a couple ME-3400G-12CS-A metro ethernet switches in our network. All the features listed on data sheet look great, however IPv6 support appears to be missing.
    Assuming the ME 3400 series does not support IPv6, will IPv6 support be available in the future through a mean of software upgrade for ME 3400's product roadmap? Or will enablement of IPv6 require complete replacement of ME3400 series products with something else (i.e. for example, Cat3550's hardware TCAM could not support IPv6, thus cat3560 is the right platform to upgrade into for v6 support).
    Thanks in advance for any suggestion that you can provide.

    ME 3400 does not support IPv6 currently in software. But there is no such limitation in ME 3400 hardware. So you can expect that IPv6 may be supported in near future.

Maybe you are looking for