IRQL Not Less Than Or Equal To [ B.S.O.D. ]

Okay, I really hope this is the right place for help, because I'm growing increasingly frustrated. Where to begin?...
Ah, alright. So, I just recently bought this computer in Janurary, and it was working fine until a few weeks ago.I shut the laptop and when I turned it on, it gave me the Blue Screen of Death. I started it up in Safe Mode, and found that this was the problem.
" Files that help describe the problem:
C:\Windows\Minidump\032812-54335-01.dmp
C:\Users\name\AppData\Local\Temp\WER-92992-0.sysdata.xml
I cleaned my temp files, but had to allow administrative permission to delete the latter. I'm not sure if I took care of the first one, but I went in and deleted stuff in the Disk Cleanup, and 'minidump' was in there...So maybe?
And I was hoping it would be okay. WELL, it was for an hour, but then I shut the laptop again and it brought the B.S.O.D up yet again, only with the IRQL etc thing.
I...don't have any idea about how any of that coding information, whatever it is, so...I ...Just have no idea.
Help. ;

1. Which computer? There is a label on the bottom.
2. Please attach the 032812-54335-01.dmp file from the C:\Windows\Minidump folder to your reply.
Bug Check 0xA: IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL
-Jerry

Similar Messages

Windows 8.1 Error (Blue Screen) DRIVER IRQL NOT LESS THAN OR EQUA

i need help with this its been very annoying every time i try to play a game after few minutes win 8 show and error and blue screeen apprear's
sorry we have encountered a problem DRIVER IRQL
NOT LESS THAN OR EQUAL please help me fix this
my laptop
HP Pavilion 15-n216se Notebook

We do need the actual log files (called a DMP files) as they contain the only record of the sequence of events leading up to the crash, what drivers
were loaded, and what was responsible.
Please follow our instructions for finding and uploading the files we need to help you fix your computer. They can be found here
If you have any questions about the procedure please ask
Wanikiya and Dyami--Team Zigzag

How to use not less than or equal to in condition

I written a querry based on the below condition in sql querry
b.key <= a.key
Based on this it will return records.
I need remaining records that not satisfy the above condition.
That means not less than or equal to records...

937506 wrote:
I written a querry based on the below condition in sql querry
b.key <= a.key
Based on this it will return records.
I need remaining records that not satisfy the above condition.
That means not less than or equal to records...you mean
b.key > a.key?

Synatax Query - Less than or Equal to

Running on Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP
I have an issue with a date query - possibly created by the
MySQL format YYYY-MM-DD
I want to create a recordset where activities are less than
or equal to today's date.
I've managed most of it but the result seems only to show
less than and not less than and equal to.
This is the part of the query that is in question:
CONTNOTES.ACTDATE<='coldatetil'
I have tried =< without success
Any ideas?

That's pretty much what the core of mine is:
SELECT CONTNOTES.ACTDATE, CONTACTS.CONTACTID, CONTACTS.LOGO,
CONTACTS.COMPANY, CONTACTS.FULLNAME, CONTNOTES.NOTEUSER,
CONTNOTES.STAGE, CONTNOTES.TYPE, CONTNOTES.NOTE, CONTNOTES.VALUE,
CONTNOTES.COMPLETED
FROM CONTACTS INNER JOIN CONTNOTES ON CONTACTS.CONTACTID =
CONTNOTES.NOTESCONTACTID
WHERE CONTNOTES.NOTEUSER='coluser' AND
(CONTNOTES.ACTDATE<='coldatetil' OR CONTNOTES.ACTDATE is null)
AND CONTNOTES.TYPE <>'10 note' AND CONTNOTES.COMPLETED=False
ORDER BY CONTNOTES.ACTDATE DESC
And yet it still only seems to return the less than part of
<=

Portege R100 - Random Blue Screen of Death (IRQL not less or equal)

Hi,
I've been getting random "Blue Screen of Death" screens in the last few weeks. The error is "IRQL not less or equal" and it's performing a memory dump every time. If I get the error and try restarting the laptop after, I usually get the same "Blue Screen of Death" screen when booting.
I didn't install any new hardware lately. Last upgrade was about a year ago; upgraded the memory. I've tried replacing the RAM with a spare one I had and I was still getting the same error.
I didn't install any new software in the last weeks that would coincide with this error.
I'm monitoring the CPU temperature and I doesn't go higher than 48 deg Celcius.
I'm not an expert but I would assume this is purely an hardware problem ? Since I rarely hear the CPU fan, I thought it could be the CPU overheating.
But even after making the CPU fan run at 100% using a freeware called "Speed Fan" I was still getting the same random "Blue Screen of Death" screen.
I would really appreciate any feedback and help. I really like my R100 and would like to fix it.
Mark.

Hello, I have a Portege R500 and I am also too having this error message. I was getting a blue screen when loading the pc advising of a memory dump issues.I ahve replaced the ram inside the laptop and this has failed to resolve the issue. I am now having the error, IRQL not less or Equal everytime. I have run a memtest86 scan and this did show up possible memory issues. SO I have replaced the memory chip again. Still showing up as memory issues.
You have mentioned this could be a cpu or memory controller. If this is the memory controller can this be replaced? or would a motherboard replacement be the best option?
I have not tried a re install of windows 7 32 bit as yet, As the memtest86 program has identified possible memory issues. Please can some one advise if replacing the cpu and possible memory controller would resolve this. Memtest log available if wanted.
Regards
John Powell

Windodws 8.1 - IRQL NOT LESS OR EQUAL

Hello everyone,
So I've been experiencing crashes with the error for IRQL NOT LESS OR EQUAL, I have searched on Google for possible reasons and it appears it could be software or hardware related (notably RAM) but I want more experienced and knowledgeable people to confirm
the root issue.
I have been getting them sporadically like once every two weeks or so, this is the latest one (not sure when they have started but longer than a month I think?).
I have installed new RAM around three weeks ago.
All my drivers are up-to-date.
I am not sure if my BIOS is up to date.
Crash Dump: http://www.mediafire.com/download/aw5s336ta6kvvi5/122513-9953-01.dmp
Not sure if useful, but I have included an event log file: http://www.mediafire.com/download/5ne2bt9swc4qk2z/12-25-2013%20Crash%20Dump.evtx
Thank you for your help!

Please run these tests to verify your memory and find which driver is causing the problem.
If you are overclocking (pushing the components beyond their design) you should revert to default at least until the crashing is solved.
If you dont know what it is you probably are not overclocking.
1-Memtest. (You can read more about running Memtest here)
2-Driver verifier (for complete directions see our Wiki here)
Advice offered in good faith. It is your decision to implement same.

NB200 - Bluetooth BSOD IRQL NOT LESS OR EQUAL

I have plugged my bluetooth dongle in, the hardware was installed, then toshiba drivers were installed.
When i try to pair, or send/receive via bluetooth i get bsod - IRQL NOT LESS OR EQUAL.
could this be down to the cheap nasty dongle i have (99p from taiwan off ebay) or perhaps due to the fact i seem to have microsoft bluetooth and toshiba bluetooth both on the laptop?

Hi
I think this BSOD appears due to software conflict.
It seems like some compatibility issue between hardware resources.
>There does seem to be alot of toshiba bluetooth software preloaded, i'm confused why this is, why would they put both on if they cant work together!!?
The NB200-12U does not support internal BlueTooth module but the software (Toshiba BT stack) was installed because its part of the image and the same image was installed on NB200 notebooks which were equipped with internal BT module too.
Maybe you should remove eh BT software from the system before installing this new BT dongle.

Less than or Equal to Variable on Calquarter is not working in Webi

Hi Guru,
I have Variable on Calquarter which brings the query result for all the cal quarters which are LESS THAN or EQUAL to entered one.
But, when we execute the Webi Report of this Bex Query, we get data for all the Calquarters in the infoprovider.
Its a "Single Value, Optional" variable with operand as LE.
Thanks in advance,
Deepak Jain

In BEx side, calquarter is mapped as key or text?
Maybe it is mapped as text and the variable in BO doesn't work correctly.
Regards.

Blue Screens, Vista 32-Bit. IRQL Not Less or Equ

Hi, before I begin, I'd like to thank anyone who can help for any assistance provided. This is my first system build and I've been running Vista for less than an hour (And it took about 0 installation attempts to do this), so forgive me for my lack of knowledge in this category. Basically whenever I try to install the drivers, I get a blue screen error that says IRQL Not Less or Equal. My system is as follows:
Creative X-Fi Fatalty Sound Card (The one with the front bezel and remote)
ASUS P5N-E SLI nForce 650i Chipset Motherboard
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 2.4GHz, Overclocked to 3.0GHz with Zalman CNPS9700 LED.
2GB Corsair XMS2 DDR2-800 RAM, Overclocked to 870MHz.
eVGA 8800GTS 320MB Graphics Card, Overclocked to 65 Core, 900 Memory
Seagate Barracuda 7200.0 320GB 7200 RPM SATA Hard Dri've
Samsung Write Master 8X DVD-RAM Lightscribe SATA Dri've
Basically, as I glimpsed through the posts I saw someone saying their 8800GTS conflicted with the X-Fi in Vista, so that's likely my problem.
Any time I installed the drivers, the blue screen happened before setup appeared to finish. Vista wouldn't boot after that and I had to use system restore from my Install DVD. I've tried undoing my overclocks but it does nothing... I doubted it would make any difference anyway though. I have no clue what to do to fix this, but if there is a possible way, it would help if it was a step-by-step thing because I'm unfamiliar with Vista, driver modification, or whatever else this will require.
Thanks again in advance for any assistance you can provide. I do appreciate it very much and am excited to get the card working again so I can resume gaming.
- Beau

Ok, by disabling my sound on my motherboard, I successfully got past this error. But now I noticed that it's interfering with my Logitech keyboard and mouse set. Basically what happened is that they stopped working and the driver install never finished (It appeared as if that program froze in action), while my mouse and keyboard were rendered useless. I restarted and did a system restore and installed the drivers for my logitech set, but now it's saying that I have not restarted since installing drivers when I attempt to install the creative drivers, despite restarting several times. Any ideas anyone?
Thanks again.
- Beau
Edit: After reading some of the other posts in this board, I would like to add that I understand that asking for X-Fi help on Vista is like asking for help in New Orleans after being in Hurricane Katrina, but I really would appreciate assistance to help getting things working.Message Edited by Supercoolyo on 07--200706:49 PM

The initial heap size must be less than or equal to the maximum heap size.

All,
Please help!!
I have tested my Application Client Project in WSAD on my pc and it works fine.
I have 1gb RAM on my pc. When I deploy the same app on another xp pc(same as mine but 512mb RAM) I get a heap size error. Here is the exact error:
Incompatible initial and maximum heap sizes specified:
initial size: 268435456 bytes, maximum heap size: 267380736 bytes
The initial heap size must be less than or equal to the maximum heap size.
The default initial and maximum heap sizes are 4194304 and 267380736 bytes.
Usage: java [-options] class [args...]
(to execute a class)
or java -jar [-options] jarfile [args...]
(to execute a jar file)
where options include:
-cp -classpath <directories and zip/jar files separated by ;>
set search path for application classes and resources
-D<name>=<value>
set a system property
-verbose[:class|gc|jni]
enable verbose output
-version print product version
-showversion print product version and continue
-? -help print this help message
-X print help on non-standard options
Could not create the Java virtual machine.
Press any key to continue . . .
Here is the batch file that runs my app:
@echo off
SET appClientEar=C:\corp\apps\mts\jars\MTSClientEAR.ear
set JVM_ARGS=-Xms256M -Xmx256M
set CLIENT_PROPS=C:\corp\apps\mts\jars\medicalclient.properties
set APP_ARGS=
call C:\bnsf\IBM\WebSphere\AppClient\bin\launchClientBNSF.bat "%JVM_ARGS%" %appClientEar% "-CCpropfile=%CLIENT_PROPS%" %APP_ARGS%
@pause
I have changed the value of Xms and Xmx of JVM_ARGS to different size but I sitll get error. Anyone knows what the problem is. Thanks..

Don't know why, but the "maximum heap size: 267380736 bytes" value is just slightly less than 256*1024*1024, wheras the reported initial size is equal to that.
Try setting the initial value to 255MB.

Less than or equal to broken?

Download the vi and check out the internals, as they will explain exactly what I'm trying to do.
Briefly, I am writing a deMUX for a signal that has digital components
of 0.25V, 0.5V, 1V, 2V, and 4V. The max signal being 7.75V and the min
being 0V. For example, if the input is 0.25V, the 5 bit digital output
will be 00001; if the input is 0.50V, the digital output will be 00010;
if the input is 0.75, then the digital output will be 00011; ... and if
the input is 7.75, then the digital output will be 11111.
In order to make the system realistic I have added tolerances to the
search. So, the tolerance I picked is 0.1V (which is well less than the
required 1/2 of the smallest voltage increment of 0.25V, which is
0.125V). Thus, any of the 32 possible voltages +/- 0.1V should decode
correctly according to the <= circuit I have set up toward the
bottom of my while loop in the attached vi. It does work for most, but
it does not work for 1.1V, 2.1V, and 3.1V... and possibly some others.
For these listed numbers, the comparison acts as a less than, rather
than a less than or equal to.
Let me know if you need more information.
Cheers,
Joe
Attachments:
Full.vi ‏39 KB

To solve your problem, all you need is to "quantize" the number to your smallest step (0.25 in your case) and convert it to an integer.
The attached code will probably produce the output you want.
Message Edited by altenbach on 12-21-2005 09:28 AM
LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .
Attachments:
FullMOD.vi ‏16 KB
FullMOD.png ‏3 KB

DS/SAP - DATAFLOW - This is less than(or equal to) the virtual memory 1609564160 bytes available for caches.

Hello,
my project is displaying the following error, when you generate a TXT record with 3 million.
I have a project that when executato DS goes to a Z table in SAP selects every record in this table (+ 3 million), and on DS it generates a TXT file separated by semicolons (;). But the DS is not getting serar this file with more than 3 million record, the DS displays the following error:
(12.2) 02-21-14 10:06:27 (2996:2952) PRINTFN: INFO - Definicao da $G_FF_Diretorio_OUT = C:\DS_Neogrid\Upload\QAS
(12.2) 02-21-14 10:06:27 (2996:2952) PRINTFN: INFO - Definicao da $G_FF_Diretorio_OUT = C:\DS_Neogrid\UpLoad\QAS
(12.2) 02-21-14 10:06:27 (5928:3040) DATAFLOW: Process to execute data flow <DF_TransfArq_035> is started.
(12.2) 02-21-14 10:06:27 (5928:3040) DATAFLOW: Data flow <DF_TransfArq_035> is started.
(12.2) 02-21-14 10:06:27 (5928:3040) DATAFLOW: Cache statistics determined that data flow <DF_TransfArq_035> uses <0> caches with a total size of <0> bytes. This is less
than(or equal to) the virtual memory <1609564160> bytes available for caches. Statistics is switching the cache type to IN
MEMORY.
(12.2) 02-21-14 10:06:27 (5928:3040) DATAFLOW: Data flow <DF_TransfArq_035> using IN MEMORY Cache.
Can anyone help me...
Thank you.
at.
Wagner

Error of the border of error of job.
(12.2) 03-06-14 08:41:54 (W) (1392:6492) SYS-170114: /JB_35_Neogrid_DimDemPrimaria/DF_TransfArq_035
Warning: Your system is running low on process virtual memory space. Available virtual memory is <22> megabytes.
(12.2) 03-06-14 08:41:55 (W) (1392:6492) SYS-170114: /JB_35_Neogrid_DimDemPrimaria/DF_TransfArq_035
Warning: Your system is running low on process virtual memory space. Available virtual memory is <22> megabytes.
(12.2) 03-06-14 08:41:56 (W) (1392:6492) SYS-170114: /JB_35_Neogrid_DimDemPrimaria/DF_TransfArq_035
Warning: Your system is running low on process virtual memory space. Available virtual memory is <22> megabytes.
(12.2) 03-06-14 08:41:57 (W) (1392:6492) SYS-170114: /JB_35_Neogrid_DimDemPrimaria/DF_TransfArq_035
Warning: Your system is running low on process virtual memory space. Available virtual memory is <22> megabytes.
(12.2) 03-06-14 08:41:58 (W) (1392:6492) SYS-170114: /JB_35_Neogrid_DimDemPrimaria/DF_TransfArq_035
Warning: Your system is running low on process virtual memory space. Available virtual memory is <22> megabytes.
Characteristics of our server.
It will be necessary to increase the virtual memory virtual?
at.
Wagner

Are there symbols for greater than or equal, less than or equal?

Hi,
I have occasional references that mention things like "Adjust the Kd pot until the voltage is <= 2.0 v" or "Turn the screw until the clearance is => .005 inch."
<= means less than or equal to.
=> means greater than or equal to.
I looked the the installed Character Sets PDF file and could not find these symbols. Is there an ASCII or ANSI code or a special font that has these items as a single symbol?
Yours,
Michael F
========

If you're using a FM8 or greater than you should use the Unicode values for these symbols:
<= is /u2264
>= is /u2265
However, the font that you are using must contain the glyphs in these code points.
With the ANSI Symbol and Dingbats sets, these symbols were coded at:
0163 (\xa3) (ctrl-q #) less than or equal to
0179 (\xb3) (ctrl-q 3) greater than or equal to

Date less than or equal to 60 days from sysdate

Hi there!
I have a doubt about an SQL query, which I don't have any idea on how to proceed.
I need the SQL to bring data only when 'e.dt_vencimento' is less than or equal to 60 days from sysdate.
Below you can see my query, and the line I stuck is the #24.
Thank you already,
Marcelo Melo
SELECT b.nr_contrato,
a.NM_PAGADOR,
a.NR_SEQ_LOTE,
a.dt_referencia,
a.DT_VENCIMENTO,
a.VL_PRE_ESTABELECIDO,
a.VL_COPARTICIPACAO,
a.VL_OUTROS,
a.VL_TITULO,
e.dt_liquidacao,
e.nr_titulo
FROM pls_mensalidade_wcp_v a,
pls_contrato b,
PLS_CONTRATO_PLANO c,
PLS_CONTRATO_PAGADOR d,
titulo_receber e
WHERE b.nr_sequencia = c.nr_seq_contrato
AND d.nr_seq_contrato = b.nr_sequencia
AND a.nr_seq_pagador = d.nr_sequencia
AND a.nr_titulo = e.nr_titulo
AND c.NR_SEQ_PLANO IN (17, 18, 25, 47, 50, 51,54,56,57,58)
AND d.cd_pessoa_fisica IS NOT NULL
and e.dt_liquidacao is null
--and e.dt_vencimento ***here I intend to write the condition***
AND a.dt_referencia =:dt_referencia
ORDER BY 2

It sounds like you want
and e.dt_vencimento <= (sysdate - 60)
That assumes that you really mean "60 days before sysdate" when you say "from sysdate". You might intend to say "60 days after sysdate". And you might mean trunc(sysdate) rather than sysdate in order to ignore the time component.

Subtotal less than or equal to a max value

Hi,
I have the following values in a table:
drop table t;
create table t (key number, ind varchar2(1), num number);
insert into t (key,ind,num) values (1,'Y',2);
insert into t (key,ind,num) values (2,'Y',10);
insert into t (key,ind,num) values (3,'Y',12);
insert into t (key,ind,num) values (4,'Y',9);
insert into t (key,ind,num) values (5,'Y',1);
insert into t (key,ind,num) values (6,'Y',1);
insert into t (key,ind,num) values (7,'Y',8);
insert into t (key,ind,num) values (8,'Y',1);
insert into t (key,ind,num) values (9,'N',11);
insert into t (key,ind,num) values (10,'N',6);
commit;The values are:
test@ORA92> select * from t order by key;
       KEY I        NUM
         1 Y          2
         2 Y         10
         3 Y         12
         4 Y          9
         5 Y          1
         6 Y          1
         7 Y          8
         8 Y          1
         9 N         11
        10 N          6
10 rows selected.
test@ORA92>For all rows with ind = "Y", I want to add "num" as long as the subtotal is less than or equal to a max value (15). For all rows with ind = "N", I want the sum of "num".
It should be as follows:
       KEY I        NUM
         1 Y          2    <- consider this, as subtotal is now 2 which is < 15
         2 Y         10   <- consider this, as subtotal is now 12 which is < 15
         3 Y         12   <- ignore this, as subtotal would be 24 which is > 15; keep running total as 12.
         4 Y          9   <- ignore this, as running total would be (12+9=) 21, which is > 15; keep running total as 12
         5 Y          1   <- consider this, as running total is now (12+1=) 13, which is <= 15
         6 Y          1   <- consider this, as running total is now (13+1=) 14 which is <= 15
         7 Y          8   <- ignore this, as running total would be (14+8=) 22, which is > 15; keep running total as 14
         8 Y          1   <- consider this, as running total is now (14+1=) 15, which is <= 15
         9 N         11 <- add this to subtotal for ind = "N"; subtotal = 11
        10 N          6 <- add this to subtotal for ind = "N"; subtotal = (11+6=) 17
Return "ac" (subtotal for ind = "Y") = 15 - the one we got at key = 8
Return "dc" (subtotal for ind = "N") = 17 - the one we got at key = 10I have a pl/sql block that does the same:
test@ORA92>
test@ORA92> --
test@ORA92> -- To derive "ac" value:
test@ORA92> --   Loop through t, and for ind = "Y", keep on adding "num" as long as
test@ORA92> --   the subtotal is less than "maxnum". Disregard values of "num"
test@ORA92> --   that would make the subtotal greater than "maxnum".
test@ORA92> -- To derive "dc" value:
test@ORA92> --   Sum of "num" values for ind = "N"
test@ORA92>
test@ORA92>
test@ORA92> declare
2    maxnum   number := 15;
3    ac       number := 0;
4    dc       number := 0;
5    prev     number := 0;
6 begin
7    FOR i IN (SELECT ind, num
8                FROM t
9              ORDER BY key)
10    LOOP
11       IF (i.ind = 'Y') THEN
12          ac := i.num + prev;
13          IF (ac > maxnum) THEN
14             ac := prev;
15          ELSE
16             prev := ac;
17          END IF;
18       ELSIF (i.ind = 'N') THEN
19          dc := i.num + dc;
20       END IF;
21    END LOOP;
22    dbms_output.put_line('maxnum = '||maxnum);
23    dbms_output.put_line('ac      = '||ac);
24    dbms_output.put_line('dc      = '||dc);
25    dbms_output.put_line('prev    = '||prev);
26 end;
27 /
maxnum = 15
ac      = 15
dc      = 17
prev    = 15
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
test@ORA92>
test@ORA92>Is there a way to do this processing in SQL instead ? The database version is 9i R2 (9.2.0.8.0).
Thanks and appreciate any help and/or pointers.
pratz...

Rob, as it was mentioned here it can be done by Hierarichal Queries, disregarding a lot of drawbacks of such a way.
SQL> with temp as (select t1.*,
2                 (select case when t1.ind = 'Y' and sum(num) > 15
3                               then null
4                               else sum(num)
5                         end
6                    from t t2
7                  connect by level <= t1.lvl
8                         and t2.key =
9                             regexp_substr(t1.path, '[^/]+', 1, t1.lvl - level + 1)
10                   start with t2.key = t1.key) summa
11            from (select t.*,
12                         level lvl,
13                         sys_connect_by_path(key, '/') path,
14                         sys_connect_by_path(rn, '/') path_rn
15                    from (select t.*,
16                                 lpad(row_number() over(partition by ind order by key),2,'0') rn
17                            from t) t
18                  connect by prior key < key
19                         and prior ind = ind
20                   start with (key, ind) in
21                              (select min(key), ind from t group by ind)) t1)
22 --
23        select ind, avg(summa) keep(dense_rank first order by path_rn) max_summ
24          from (select temp.*,
25                       decode(instr(lead(path_rn) over(partition by ind order by path_rn), path_rn),1, 0, 1) flag
26                  from temp
27                 where summa is not null)
28         where flag = 1
29         group by ind
30 /
IND   MAX_SUMM
N           17
Y           15
SQL>

IRQL Not Less Than Or Equal To [ B.S.O.D. ]

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for