Is ACR redundant for me?

I hate to ask stupid questions but here goes: I import raw files for my Nikon into Aperture. Occasionally, I will export them to PSE 6.0 for creative purposes--so how will ACR help me? Or, maybe the better question is, what will it do that Aperture and PSE don't do? thanks, Mike

60young wrote:
I hate to ask stupid questions but here goes: I import raw files for my Nikon into Aperture. Occasionally, I will export them to PSE 6.0 for creative purposes--so how will ACR help me?
ACR should have no effect because Aperture has already performed the RAW conversion.
Or, maybe the better question is, what will it do that Aperture and PSE don't do?
ACR does a less-good job of converting Nikon RAW (.NEF files) than Aperture does. Note that if you do a raw conversion in PSE it is ACR doing the conversion.
-Allen Wicks

Similar Messages

How to provied Redundancy for VRF MGMT with help of BGP over MPLS(MPBGP)

Hi,
Please find the Network Topology.
This is One Remote site and mamaged by Mgmt office.
All devices on remote site is accessed by MGMT Office. My organisation seek for Redundancy for Managing devices.
My administration is from MGW to R1. I am new to MPLS.
AS u can see in diagram, R1 have 3 VRF(Voice,Signal and MGMT).Currently i have primary link over whitch we are running MPBGP.
Traffic from these VRF goes to this primary link. Currently Secondary link is not connected.
Now my organisation proposed for the secondary link and they want that only traffic from VRF -- MGMT should go through MPLS RTR R2 (the secondary link ) , when the mgmt routes not learned from MPLS RTR R1 (Connected to the SP1 ).
Current R1 config
There is IBGP betweem R1 to both MPLS RTR.
BGP Config
router bgp 64513
synchronization disable
neighbor 10.36.150.1 remote-as 64513
neighbor 10.36.150.1 activate
neighbor 10.36.150.1 update-source loopback1
address-family ipv4 vrf signalling
    redistribute connected
    redistribute static
$
address-family ipv4 vrf voice
    redistribute connected
    redistribute static
$
address-family ipv4 vrf OAM-T
    redistribute connected
    redistribute static
$
address-family vpnv4
    neighbor 10.36.150.1 activate
    neighbor 10.36.150.1 send-community
$
!<ospfv2>
router ospf 100
interface gei-3/3
    network point-to-point
$
network 10.36.150.49 0.0.0.0 area 0.0.0.0 --- loopback ip (Configured)
network 10.36.149.60 0.0.0.3 area 0.0.0.0 ---- p2p ip bet R1 and MPLS R1.(Configured)
network 10.36.149.64 0.0.0.3 area 0.0.0.0 ---- p2p ip bet R1 and MPLS R2. ---------- (till now not configured as secondary link is not connected)
router-id 10.36.150.49
so what configuration need to done at R1 to achiev the redunancy for MGMT vrf ?
if possible please reply with sample configuration.
or
IN MPBGP protocol, where i will apply routing policy to apply as- path prepand    so that Route would be secondary to neighbor.
IGP-OSPF and BGP over MPLS is running.
on Which address-familiy nbr,should i apply, is it in VPNV4 or IPV4 or IPV4 VRF ?
if i want 10.36.128.0/26 prefix should go to Neigbhor MPLS R2, what should i use access-list or Prefix list?
please provide the reply with its config .
thanks in advance,
Regards,
Ajay
Message was edited by: Ajaykumar yadav

Hi,
Please find the Network Topology.
This is One Remote site and mamaged by Mgmt office.
All devices on remote site is accessed by MGMT Office. My organisation seek for Redundancy for Managing devices.
My administration is from MGW to R1. I am new to MPLS.
AS u can see in diagram, R1 have 3 VRF(Voice,Signal and MGMT).Currently i have primary link over whitch we are running MPBGP.
Traffic from these VRF goes to this primary link. Currently Secondary link is not connected.
Now my organisation proposed for the secondary link and they want that only traffic from VRF -- MGMT should go through MPLS RTR R2 (the secondary link ) , when the mgmt routes not learned from MPLS RTR R1 (Connected to the SP1 ).
Current R1 config
There is IBGP betweem R1 to both MPLS RTR.
BGP Config
router bgp 64513
synchronization disable
neighbor 10.36.150.1 remote-as 64513
neighbor 10.36.150.1 activate
neighbor 10.36.150.1 update-source loopback1
address-family ipv4 vrf signalling
    redistribute connected
    redistribute static
$
address-family ipv4 vrf voice
    redistribute connected
    redistribute static
$
address-family ipv4 vrf OAM-T
    redistribute connected
    redistribute static
$
address-family vpnv4
    neighbor 10.36.150.1 activate
    neighbor 10.36.150.1 send-community
$
!<ospfv2>
router ospf 100
interface gei-3/3
    network point-to-point
$
network 10.36.150.49 0.0.0.0 area 0.0.0.0 --- loopback ip (Configured)
network 10.36.149.60 0.0.0.3 area 0.0.0.0 ---- p2p ip bet R1 and MPLS R1.(Configured)
network 10.36.149.64 0.0.0.3 area 0.0.0.0 ---- p2p ip bet R1 and MPLS R2. ---------- (till now not configured as secondary link is not connected)
router-id 10.36.150.49
so what configuration need to done at R1 to achiev the redunancy for MGMT vrf ?
if possible please reply with sample configuration.
or
IN MPBGP protocol, where i will apply routing policy to apply as- path prepand    so that Route would be secondary to neighbor.
IGP-OSPF and BGP over MPLS is running.
on Which address-familiy nbr,should i apply, is it in VPNV4 or IPV4 or IPV4 VRF ?
if i want 10.36.128.0/26 prefix should go to Neigbhor MPLS R2, what should i use access-list or Prefix list?
please provide the reply with its config .
thanks in advance,
Regards,
Ajay
Message was edited by: Ajaykumar yadav

Router redundancy for Channelised E1s?

Well I have two 7606 routers and around 40 channelised E1s, I have two STM - 1 mux and four STM - 4 mux at my premises, I need to design a topology such that the two 7606 routers should be redundant i.e. in case of failure another 7606 router should switch over and provide connectivity from my LAN to the MUX.
While searching I found Automatic Protection Switching as one solution where I would have to use sonet card on 7606 routers and this sonet card would connect to an Add/Drop multiplexer.
I need to know whether STM-4 mux can be connected to STM-1 card.
Also, If I use STM - 4 card then can I have 1000 interfaces for channelised E1s on one single STM-4 card?
PA-MC-STM-1 card seems to support only 256 interfaces.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/port_adapters/install_upgrade/multichannel_serial/multichannel-stm-1_install_config/2746ovr.html
Suppose if I use multiple STM-1 cards and configure APS for redundancy, and only one SONET card fails, so will the switchover be for all the cards or just the for the card which has failed?

I need to design a topology such that the two 7606 routers should be redundant i.e. in case of failure another 7606 router should switch over and provide connectivity from my LAN to the MUX.
Automatic PRotection Switching (APS) is solution for STM1 card failure.Suppose if your 7606 is working but your STM 1 card fails then other card will be used by APS. But if you need redundancy for your 7606 router then i think you have to use HSRP,VRRP,GLBP whichever suits for the traffic pattern.
I need to know whether STM-4 mux can be connected to STM-1 card.
You cannot connect STM 4 card to a STM 1 card but you CAN connect STM 1 card on your STM 4 mux to STM 1 card in router.
if I use multiple STM-1 cards and configure APS for redundancy, and only one SONET card fails, so will the switchover be for all the cards or just the for the card which has failed?
APS is 1+1 kind of protection so 1 card is protecetd by 1 different card and can be used only for you have defined. So if you have 2 STM card/port in your router and want to use protect both of them then you need 2 more card/port in your router

ACR 4.4, ACR 3.3...What does the "ACR" stand for ?

In the Camera Calibration tab in Camera Raw or Lightroom, we can choose the profile from the menu.
There are so many profiles in the menu, ACR 4.4, ACR 3.3...What does the "ACR" stand for ?

ACR x.x designates an older style of profile where Adobe named their profiles for the version of Adobe Camera RAW that first supported the camera--basically the vintage of the profile, so if Adobe updated the profile then you'd be able to pick whether you wanted the old one or the new one.

Redundancy for single IDSM on two separate chassis

Can EtherChannel protocol be used to provide active/standby redundancy for single IDSM on two different chassis.
Rgds.

From the given link, I understand that active/standby redundancy configuration is not possible for IDSM's on two different chassis. Only active/active is possible.
Secondly, please let me know whether the below configuration is for two IDSM's within same chassis or across two separate chassis.
intrusion-detection module 4 management-port access-vlan 100
intrusion-detection module 5 management-port access-vlan 100
intrusion-detection module 4 data-port 1 channel-group 5
intrusion-detection module 4 data-port 2 channel-group 6
intrusion-detection module 5 data-port 1 channel-group 5
intrusion-detection module 5 data-port 2 channel-group 6
intrusion-detection port-channel 5 trunk allowed-vlan 200-204,208
intrusion-detection port-channel 5 trunk allowed-vlan 708
intrusion-detection port-channel 5 autostate include
intrusion-detection port-channel 5 portfast enable
intrusion-detection port-channel 6 trunk allowed-vlan 260,280,400,401
intrusion-detection port-channel 6 trunk allowed-vlan 111-114
intrusion-detection port-channel 6 autostate include
intrusion-detection port-channel 6 portfast enable
Rgds.

Normal redundancy for voting files

Hey, currently I configured normal redundancy for my ocr and voting disks.
crsctl query css votedisk is showin orcl:ocr1, orcl:ocr2, orcl:ocr4 as configured disks.
All disks resides on the same storage but in two different aggegrates - two raid groups.
Does it makes sense to put one voting file on a seperat nfs share ?
Just in case, one raid group is malfunctiong. I know, in case the storage is powered off, the cluster will die.

Hi,
I never heard about raid group is malfunctiong by itself (except when somebody makes a mess on RAID).
RAID System (storage) is designed to support failures, you can choose the RAID level as needed. Raid is a feature of STORAGE the manufacturer of the storage must ensure that it will work. If it is proven that the issue of data loss was caused by failure of storage (bug) you can sue the manufacturer.
I believe that the data (database) are on the same storage. right? If you have only two raid and one fails you will lose a part of your environment (e.g database, etc.). So NFS option is useless if it can't provide high availability.
If you have more than 2 raid group you can use the other raid group instead of NFS, is more easy NFS fail than RAID fail. (but it's your choice)
Regards,
Levi Pereira

Anyone help me redundancy for serial in to fast ethernet

We have connected some customer through leaseline through router serial interface .
the main problem is sometime the leaseckt is down for 2 or 3 days continously.
so we want redundancy for those customer.
we have backup rf link
so any possiblities are there for if serial interface line protocol went down automatically traffic swithover to ethernet interface of 3550 switch fa interface

Hi
in this figure the customer have one ip 16 ip block that is oruted with IGRP in PE router
we want either link customer use same ip block.
and in RF link Base Station is connected in L3 Swith Fast Eternet port.
All rf customers are in different VLANS.
if the LeaselIne went down the traffic will automatically swithed over to rf link
means the L3 swith fast ethernet port have several vlan membership in this it automatically go.
sorry for poor english.
looking forward u r reply.
thanks

Latest ACR version for CS3?

I have CS3 and ACRv4.6 which does not recognize Panasonic Lumix LX3 raw files.
What is the latest ACR version for CS3 and where can I download it from?
Thanks.

Version 4.6 is the last update for Photoshop CS3. You will need to either download the free DNG Converter version 5.4 (or the beta 5.5) and convert the raw file to DNG or update to Photoshop CS4. If you go the DNG route, even versions of Camera Raw as far back as 2.4 in Photoshop CS will be able to read the converted files.

– Enable high availability and redundancy for Cisco WAAS

How this is available
– Enable high availability and redundancy for Cisco WAAS appliances in data centers.
Thank you.

Hi,
You can serially cluster two WAE devices with the Cisco WAE Inline Network Adapter installed to provide higher availability in the data center if a device fails. If the current optimizing device fails, the inline group shuts down, or the device becomes the overloaded, the second WAE device in the cluster provides the optimization services. Deploying WAE devices in a serial inline cluster for scaling or load balancing is not supported.
More deatils here: Clustering Inline WAEs
Hope this helps.
Regards.
PS: Please mark this as Answered, if this answers your question.

ACR support for EOS 5D MkII

Greetings.
I have a simple question - how soon can we expect to have ACR support for the 5D MkII once the camera starts shipping? I will need to sell my MkI to subsidise the upgrade, so will need to time my purchase so that ACR support will be out there when I take delivery.
Kind regards
Joanne

I've already got my CS4 upgrade and love it! It's the best yet! CS2 was okay, CS3 was better, but CS4 really is absolutely brilliant. The improvements are very plain to see.
Sorry Jeff, I didn't mean to put you on the spot - my sincere apologies!
Previously I've not had a problem. I wasn't gemmed up on raw when I bought my 20D (my first DSLR), and I didn't buy my 5D until more than a year after launch. I wasn't expecting a precise answer, only a generic one. The latest arrivals have been incorporated within weeks of them starting to ship and the 5D MKII has just missed the boat.
I haven't placed my order for my new camera yet, so can plan ahead and hold back a little. It was better to give consideration to the raw support now than jump in and suddenly find myself limited to DPP as that would spoil my fun with CS4/ACR5.1 and Lightroom 2.1.
Thanks all.
Joanne

How to implement long-distance box-box Redundant for CSS product?

I want to config box-box redundancy for CSS,but It's about 1200+ meters from one to the other,
so it couldn't implement using crossover UTP cable.
(DOes it work well when link with Fiber optical transceiver between the two Content Switches ?)
or
Would you pls. give your solution for this ?
Thanks,
thomas

As far as my knowledge goes I think cross over cable is the only option.When the CSS are too far apart, Box-to-Box
redundancy cannot be used.A gige-cable cannot be used for failover.
Have a look at this:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/webscale/css/advcfggd/redndncy.htm#xtocid145103

AutoAttendant Redundancy for Unity in SRST

I'm trying to acheive redundancy for AA configured in Unity in a Centralised UCM 7.x environment for a remote site in SRST using TLC script, the solution works fine in MGCP environment but I'm trying to acheive it utilizing H323 as the link is CAS R2 and not PRI, the problem is that the aa number does not hunt for the VoIP dial-peer and always hunts for the pots dial-peer because of the "incoming called number" and "service aa" under the pots, is there away that we can acheive this?

Thank you for your reply, but I already tried this and it still hunts to the pots dial-peer a snapshot of the config is as follows :
dial-peer voice 1 pots
incoming called-number .
direct-inward-dial
dial-peer voice 10 voip
preference 0
incoming called-number [Unity AA Number]
destination-pattern [Unity AA Number]
session target ipv4:[UCM IP Address]
codec g711ulaw
no vad
ip qos dscp cs3 signalling
dial-peer voice 100 pots
preference 1
incoming called-number [TLC AA Number]
service autoatt
destination-pattern [TLC AA Number]
port 1/0/0:15
where [Unity AA Number] = [TLC AA Number]
and still the pots gets invoked prior to the voip if I shut down the pots or take incoming called-number for it it goes to unity

Redundancy for Cisco Unified Communications Manager Business Edition 8.0.

Hi,
Is there redundancy for Cisco Unified Communications Manager Business Edition 8.0.
Can I deploy more than one server at a site for redundancy?
Thanks
Mudassir

No. UCM-BE is a single-server solution. You can use CME in SRST mode for survivability if the server is offline.

No ACR Update for Photoshop Elements 13.1 ?

Hello all,
that latest ACR update for Photoshop Elements 13 seems to be 8.7.1 released in December.
In the meantime ACR 8.8 and ACR 9.0 have been released, but obviously not for Photoshop Elements.
Does anybody have an idea whether there will be further ACR updates for PSE or not ?
Best regards
Stephan Nicolay

12 hours later, I tried a Help / Updates in PSE13.1 Editor and I am getting ACR 9 so it just took a few more hours for Adobe to get the update ready, at least in the US.

Questions on redundancy for RAC

Grid Infra version: 11.2.0.4
Platform: Oracle Linux
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e18951/asmdiskgrps.htm#OSTMG13711
Question1.
We use Enterprise class storage from Hitachi Data Systems called VSP for our diskgroup LUNs. They provided frame(hardware) level RAID protection. Hitachi SAN admins confirmed that the LUNs they allocate are created our disks from different failure groups. In this case , do we need to use High or Normal redundancy ?
Question2.
We are going to build a 3 node RAC cluster for a very critical application. For the +OCR_VOTE diskgroup, we are going to use LUNs from Hitachi VSP. SAN admins are going to allocate 1GB LUNs for this. In addition to the hardware level protection provided by Hitachi , we would like to have an ASM level redundancy as well. We prefer High Redundancy for +OCR_VOTE diskgroup. So, how many 1GB LUNs will be required for this ? How is this calculation done ? The above oracle documentation just says "three way mirroring" for High redundancy , does this mean, that, to protect data in a 1GB LUN we need another three 1GB LUNs (total four 1GB LUNs ) for High Redundancy ?

Thanks. Billy.
It looks like +OCR_VOTE diskgroup is a special case in which
the number of disks for Normal redundancy is 3
the number of disks for Hig redundancy is 5
Using three 1GB LUNs , i tried to create +OCR_VOTE diskgroup with High redundancy. But, it errored out saying
INS-30510 Insufficient Number of ASM disk selected
Action: For a disk group with redundancy level 'High', at least '5' disks are recommended.
So, I had to allocate five 1GB LUNs in total to create a High Redundancy +OCR_VOTE diskgroup.
Confirmed from ML Note ID:428681.1
For Voting disks (never use even number of voting disks):
External redundancy requires minimum of 1 voting disk (or 1 failure group)
Normal redundancy requires minimum of 3 voting disks (or 3 failure group)
High redundancy requires minimum of 5 voting disks (or 5 failure group)
Any idea why do we need 5 disks instead of 3 disks for High redundancy when it comes to OCR_VOTE diskgroup ?

Is ACR redundant for me?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for