Is AMD Radeon r7 260x or Nvidia Gtx 750 Ti compatible with my PC?

Hi, I have a dell inspiron 3847 with intel core -5-4460 @3.2 GHZ proccessor and integrated intel hd graphics 4600. I think my power supply has 300 watts but I am not sure. I was wondering if an AMD Radeon r7 260x graphics card or an Nvidia gtx 750 ti card would be compatible with my PC. I know that the nvidia card uses less power but it costs 40 dollars more so if an amd card can go with my power supply then I will get that. Any help would be appreciated thanks.

R7 260X requires much larger power supply. 750 TI versions may need secure boot turned off.
ANY card longer than about 8.1 inches is not going to physically fit into the case.

Similar Messages

Does anyone know if the NVIDIA GTX 680 is compatible with Premier Pro 6?

I am looking for a graphics card to utilize the mercury graphics engine. Does anyone know if the GTX 680 works with Premier Pro 6?

Bill,
If I recall correctly, the only system difference between
the two scores was 24GB RAM @#1 instead of 12GB @#17.
It came as something of a surprise that doubling the RAM
was able to knock down MPEG-2 encoding by more than 50%.
I also seem to recall that once this fact was known... most everyone
doubled their RAM within a couple of weeks resulting in my stay
at the top of the list being pretty brief!

The video card Asus GeForce GTX 650 and GeForce GTX 750 are compatible with After Effects CC? An apology for my English.

I will buy one of the two, but I urge confirm if any of them will help me with Newest After Effects CC. Thank you very much.

This page lists the technical specifications for After Effects.
After Effects doesn't really use the GPU for much besides the obsolete ray-traced renderer (see here), so either one should be fine. Some third-party effects, such as Element 3d from VideoCopilot, make use of the GPU, but their requirements are different from AE's and if you plan to use them, you should check their requirements before you purchase.

Possible to Use Radeon 4870 AND EVGA NVIDIA GTX 285 at the Same Time?

Hello,
I just tried to connect a second 30 inch Cinema display to my early 2009 8-core MacPro with a Radeon 4870 card.
The second display maxes out at 1280 x 800 resolution.
I think that is a function of the second port on the 4870, rather than a limitation of the card itself.
To get around this, I ordered the EVGA NVIDIA GTX 285. At $499, that's a big yikes.
Here is my question: Will I get better performance running one 30 inch from the Radeon, and the second from the Nvidia? Can I even install both at the same time? Or should I remove the Radeon and use just the Nvidia?
FWIW, I use this Mac for Photoshop and other image software, and for some stats work. No games. I am using CS4, which would never recognize my 4870. Maybe I will do better with the EVGA NVIDIA GTX 285?
I would appreciate any and all help on this!
Thanks!
Charles

I just tried to connect a second 30 inch Cinema display to my early 2009 8-core MacPro with a Radeon 4870 card.
Are you using the Mini DisplayPort to Dual-Link DVI Adapter?
<http://store.apple.com/us/product/MB571Z/A?fnode=MTY1NDA5OQ&mco=MjkyNjI0Mg>
The second display maxes out at 1280 x 800 resolution.
That's the resolution the 30" will run at with a single-link DVI connection.
I think that is a function of the second port on the 4870, rather than a limitation of the card itself.
It depends on the adapter you use.
To get around this, I ordered the EVGA NVIDIA GTX 285. At $499, that's a big yikes.
It has twice the graphics memory, so may be better if you are processing lots of large images at once.
Here is my question: Will I get better performance running one 30 inch from the Radeon, and the second from the NVIDIA?
No. For only two displays, one card is better because it can handle moving windows between displays, or windows spanning both displays. With the displays on different cards, the main computer has to do more work. Even if the windows are never going to cross display boundaries, there is no way for the applications to know that, so they won't let the graphics cards do as much as they could.
Can I even install both at the same time?
No. There are only two auxiliary power connectors, and one card will use both.
Or should I remove the Radeon and use just the NVIDIA?
Try each card and see which gives the best results with your applications.
FWIW, I use this Mac for Photoshop and other image software, and for some stats work. No games. I am using CS4, which would never recognize my 4870. Maybe I will do better with the EVGA NVIDIA GTX 285?
The extra video RAM may give better performance with lors of large images.

NVidia GTX 970 loses compatibility with OS X 10.10.2 updates

Hi
Running a MacPro (early 2009), 2.66 Quad-Core Intel Xeon. Recently installed an NVidia GTX 970 GPU to aid in video and graphics production. Upgraded to Yosemite from Mavericks and installed the NVidia web-driver (343.02.02f02) and CUDA panel and had it working fine.
I ran software update today to get my printer set up (HP F380) with the drivers provided through Apple Software Update, as directed by the HP website. Updates pictured below.
When I restarted my Mac, as prompted by OS X. The display failed to display. Using my (trusty old) Macbook to screen share to see what was going on revealed that the current NVidia web-driver is incompatible with, I assume, something in that update list. Looking at the NVidia section of the System Preferences shows the NVidia options greyed out and the OS X Drivers option selected. Pictured below.
Contacted NVidia to check I had the right driver. They claimed the card wasn't supported in OS X and that I should ask Apple. So here it is. Anyone else have or know of this issue or, even better, know a way around it?
Thanks in advance.
Kevin

Hi
Running a MacPro (early 2009), 2.66 Quad-Core Intel Xeon. Recently installed an NVidia GTX 970 GPU to aid in video and graphics production. Upgraded to Yosemite from Mavericks and installed the NVidia web-driver (343.02.02f02) and CUDA panel and had it working fine.
I ran software update today to get my printer set up (HP F380) with the drivers provided through Apple Software Update, as directed by the HP website. Updates pictured below.
When I restarted my Mac, as prompted by OS X. The display failed to display. Using my (trusty old) Macbook to screen share to see what was going on revealed that the current NVidia web-driver is incompatible with, I assume, something in that update list. Looking at the NVidia section of the System Preferences shows the NVidia options greyed out and the OS X Drivers option selected. Pictured below.
Contacted NVidia to check I had the right driver. They claimed the card wasn't supported in OS X and that I should ask Apple. So here it is. Anyone else have or know of this issue or, even better, know a way around it?
Thanks in advance.
Kevin

Is nvidia geforce gtx 675mx card compatible with fcpx

Is the Nvidia geforce gtx 675mx comes with the new iMac 27" compatible with fcpx?
I could not find it on Apple's list of cards required or fcpx

It should be.
I have only heard about issues with the 640mx card..
But FCPX uses OpebCL and other system API's to use the GPU, so if someting is not working, it should be the OS having issues..

It is NVIDIA 4800 for MAC Compatible with a Mid 2010 MACPRO,... 5,1

I would like to know if my MACPRO Mid 2010 (5,1) it is compatible with NVIDIA FX 4800 for mac or NVIDIA 4000
thank you

Apple no longer lists it, Nvidia web site though:
Go to • About This Mac
Click on the • More Info button
Select • Hardware
The model identifier should be MacPro3,1 or MacPro4,1 (2008 or 2009) or later
http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_quadro_fx_4800_for_mac_us.html
And if you are going to spend say $798 for Q4000 (Amazon, Mac Pro version) maybe wait and see but 10.7.4 support for a GTX 570 2.5GB might do a better job even where Quadro use to (due to drivers, not hardware itsself)
http://www.amazon.com/PNY-Quadro-DisplayPort-PCI-Express-VCQ4000MAC-PB/dp/B004CR S78O/
http://www.jigsaw3d.com/articles/gpu-performance-review-nvidia-quadro-4000-for-m ac

NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 compatible with 23" display ?

Hi,
I would like to know if my graphic card is compatible with a 23" apple display ?
I have a NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 with 128Mo, this card has a PCI connexion,
but I am not sure if my card could support a cinema display at 1900x1200 ?
Does anyone have an idea ?
Is there a list somewhere giving compatble graphic card ?
The nvidia site does not say a word about cinema display !
Thanks for the answers,
Ben
no Mac .. V. sad indeed ! Other OS linux and xp user

Apple doesn't make compatibility information known
for non-Apple systems.
But yes, they do.
Here is the list of tested video cards for the ACDs:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=301066
I highly recommend the Quadro cards; they are fantastic.
nansaidh
Dell Windows XP Pro 23" Cinema Display

Is NVIDIA GeForce 6600 card compatible with OpenGL 2.0?

Hi there -
Is my GeForce 6600 card compatible with openGL 2.0?
I have some software that tells me it is not and I've just spent lots of money buying it - I did make a quick check on-line before making my software purchase and found out that the whole 6000 series was compatible.
Reading again it says it has been OK for 2.1 from June 2006 onwards. I bought my Mac in May 2006
Can I install a new driver or something (almost sounds like I know what I'm talking about)?
If so is this something I can do or do I have to take my whole machine to the hospital?
I'm not that confident messing with too much technical stuff so treat me like an idiot ... please!
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Regards - Deano

Hi-
Back from work......
BD has you going the right direction on RAM.
CS4 needs as much RAM as you can throw at it.
Buy only guaranteed Mac compatible RAM.
As for hard drive, getting a TB or so for storage is great, but you also need a fast scratch drive, separate from the system drive.
Improvements to hard drive technology have been made since the G5 was released, so replacing the system drive with a new one is a good idea.
For the fastest system drive, which helps overall performance, the Western Digital Velociraptor 300GB is an ideal candidate.
For more of a budget drive, but still fast, a WD6400AAKS 640GB drive is an overall winner, with fast read and write times, and all that capacity confined to two platters in the drive.
This is one of the keys to the drives performance prowess.
For scratch, you will have large files that are written, changed, erased, as filters, etc. are applied.
PS gobbles drive space even more than it eats RAM.
Again, the WD6400AAKS, or a WD1001FALS 1TB drive is what you should look at.
And when we talk scratch drives, I mean that it does nothing else.
Not for file storage, etc.
File storage needs to be relegated to a third drive for system optimization.
To recap, a fast boot drive (OS and applications only), a scratch drive, and as many file storage drives as you need for multiple copies (min 2) of all work.
As for graphics card, yes there is improvement to be had, especially with regard to OpenGL support in CS4.
PS also leverages the GPU of the graphics card, so power is desired.
A Mac 7800GT, Radeon X1900 G5 Edition, or a flashed Geforce 7800GTX are the three top performing cards.
A Geforce FX4500 is also a possible candidate if your pockets are very deep.
http://www.jcsenterprises.com/Japamacs_Page/Blog/71BBF3EF-9713-4C53-8B80-26771F8 A4087.html
Of the three cards, the 7800GTX is the top card, and is relatively easy to find. The 512MB version is the most desirable.
You will be looking on eBay for Mac compatible PCIe graphics cards in one of the flavors that I have named.
A bit from Adobe:
http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/404/kb404898.html
http://www.adobe.com/products/aftereffects/opengl.html

Video Card Upgrade - NVidia GeForce 8600 GT compatible with this PC?

I would like to upgrade my son's graphics card on his computer - an HP Pavilion D4100E with an AMD Athlon 64 Processor 3800+ 2.39 GHz running Windows XP. Can anyone tell me if the GeForce 8600 GT is compatible?

The new GT240 bridges the gap in performance between 9600gt and 9800gt, adds a couple of new features, and uses significantly less power than the 9800gt and may use less than a 9600gt (due to NVidia moving to a 40nm manufacturing process for that chip.)
*disclaimer* I am not now, nor have I ever been, an employee of Best Buy, Geek Squad, nor of any of their affiliate, parent, or subsidiary companies.

Gtx 750 ti compatibility with m93p 10a8 sff?

okay so am planning to upgrade by the next few weeks and i want to know if This graphic card is compatible and is the vga on it removable if i want to put a low profile bracket on it or i have to do some crazy stuff on it to be able to remove it?

It should be obvious that none of us has actually attempted to use that MSI card in an M93p SFF case. So you're not going to get any additional information that we have not already shared... which is based on our own perusal of web pages describing products and their dimensions. You're just going to have to go with what seems to make the most sense, and be prepared to return it if something doesn't work.
As I have repeated said, I HAVE used the Sapphire AMD R7-250 1GB DDR5 single-slot single-wide low-profile card in a multiple M930 SFF machines, and it works perfect. Fits, and runs with 240W PSU just fine. So in worst case that's your fallback, and it will still be superior to the built-in Intel HD 4600 graphics.
Note the dimensions shown for this R7-250 card, as well as the picture which absolutely shows a low-profile PCB card with matching low-profile bracket. The dimensions are 170mm (6.69") x 67mm (2.64") x 18mm (.71"). The card is absolutely a single-slot single-width low-profile PCB with low-profile bracket attached.
Now compare that to the single-fan double-slot double-wide Gigabyte card (i.e. the correct one that I pointed to, priced sensibly and with the multiple DP,. DVI and 2xHDMI digital connectors and no VGA) This one purports to be 175mm (6.97") long by 121mm (4.76") high by 42mm (1.65") thick. The length sounds ok, and the double-thickness is understandable from its double-slot form factor. But I am absolutely certain that the 121mm (4.76") height dimension cannot possibly be correct for the low-profile bracket. This can only be measured with the full-size bracket attached, as that clearly is not low-profile size. But with the low-profile (included in the box) bracket installed I would guess it now probably matches the size of the PCB card itself, which although not actually provided certainly looks from the picture to be about 1/2 the size of the full-size bracket and also looks very similar to the height of the AMD R7-250.
And finally, there is the double-fan single-slot double-wide MSI version of the card. This one (which has DVI and HDMI, but no DP) shows as 5.75" by 2.72" (sounds correct for low-profile bracket size height) by 1.5" (double-thick, single-slot). Again, this sounds good, being in fact more than 1" shorter than the Gigabyte card. But then the Gigabyte card's length matches that of the AMD R7-250, which for sure fits in the SFF case anyway.
That's the best I can offer. All three cards should work once the low-profile brackets are attached. That's just a guess however, for the two GTX 750ti cards that I've never actually used myself.
Look... these multple web site descriptions seem to be using the same pictures, but have different (and seemingly impossible) dimensions, so I can't help that. Just contact the seller and ask for specifics, and buy what you believe will fit and work problem-free, and hope for the best. If not, you'll just have to react.

Nvidia 173xx driver updated, compatible with latest xorg

http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthr … ?p=2557225
This driver was removed from extra in September. Now, in may you can finally update to a current xorg.

Not quite. The 32bit version tries to use a symbol that was removed some time ago, so it has non-working opengl. The 64bit version works fine. Nvidia is aware of it, so maybe there will be an update.

How to turn on the AMD Radeon R7 M260 (2GB) on Thinkpad E450

Hello everyone, I have just bought a thinkpad laptop edge 450 . However, despite I have installed all the drivers that needed, the AMD Radeon R7 M260 (2GB) still couldn't be used. Instead, what is always in use is just the Intel graphic card, which has a poor display quality. I have tried to reinstall all the drivers several times, even the system. But it still doesn't work. Thus, I wonder if anyone know how to turn on the AMD Radeon R7 M260 (2GB)? Is there anything wrong with it? I am really looking forward to your reply. Thanks very much!

Hi Guoftao,
Welcome to Lenovo Forums!
To know if the card is currently enabled please go to:
Control panel > System > Device manager > Display adapters > Right click on your R7 M260 and check if it’s set to ‘Enabled’
You can also check the properties of the graphic card to see if it is listed as functioning correctly by Windows.
Please let us know whether the above steps helped you.
Regards,
Naveen.v

I can't update my Graphic Card AMD Radeon HD 7670M

Hi Guys ,
i'm new Here ,i have Hp Pavilion G6 2332se ,it has AMD Radeon HD 7670M ,i tried to update it but it makes intel hd graphics 4000 not defined ,and this is the result when i update the card

Hi @AhmedZizo
Welcome to the HP Support Forums!
I understand that you are having trouble after trying to update your video driver for the AMD Radeon 7670M. I am happy to assist you with this. Firstly can you verify the full product number for your notebook, for some reason I did not see that version on the list when I looked for it. Also the operating system in use would be helpful. Please read the following documents if you need help in finding those.
How Do I Find My Model Number or Product Number?
Is the Windows Version on My Computer 32-bit or 64-bit?
Once I have that I can find the correct driver page for you.
You can check out this page as an FYI.
Switchable Graphics on Notebooks Configured with Intel and ATI GPUs
Another choice would be to try to either reload your old drivers from the recovery partition, or try a system restore in the hopes that may be all that is necessary. If you use the System Recovery option just be sure you are only choosing to reload drivers. A full recovery would reimage your hard drive. Just in case you may wish to back up any data on your notebook first.
Using Microsoft System Restore (Windows 8)
Using Microsoft System Restore (Windows 7)
Performing an HP System Recovery (Windows 8)
Troubleshooting HP System Recovery Problems (Windows 8)
Performing an HP System Recovery (Windows 7)
Troubleshooting HP System Recovery Problems (Windows 7)
Malygris1
I work on behalf of HP
Please click Accept as Solution if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click Kudos Thumbs Up on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!

Alpha transparency no longer working on iMac retina with AMD Radeon R9 M295X 4096 MB

Purchased new retina iMac with all the trimmings, including AMD Radeon R9 M295X 4096 MB. Now all presentations with alpha transparency no longer have transparency!
Having so many display issues with this new card. Anybody else with the same?

I've found the issue. Sort of.
The numerous display issues are a bug with the graphics driver (software) that cause problems with various software packages, such as Photoshop etc. Awaiting a fix from Apple.
The Keynote problem is exactly that. I loaded Keynote on my non-retina macbook pro, and the same issue is there. Maybe Keynote or Yosemite.
Found out that in order to restore transparency I have to select the image, select Alpha Channel, click on the image (after a couple of times I realised that there is no need to result the area to be transparent), and then it's back.
Somehow the image needed to be reminded that it had an alpha channel.
Yet another software bug.

Is AMD Radeon r7 260x or Nvidia Gtx 750 Ti compatible with my PC?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for