Is Aperture for me? (Photo organisation for a non-professional)

I'm not a professional photographer, I'm just looking for a way to better organise my personal photos. However I am a graphic designer and know my way around editing photos and I have some of RAW files too.
So, currently, my iPhoto library is a wasteland- mostly duplicates that I imported at some point for some reason or another.
The rest of my photos are simply in named folders. I have about 200 gigs of the stuff, going back to 2006 (plus older ones on other drives)
Currently, I simply use cover flow and quick view to browse photos. It works surprisingly well, but it's no match for a proper solution (geotagging, face recognition, creating books, flagging, rating, etc.)
So, if you use Aperture, I'd love to ask you:
• Is Aperture your primary photo organisation tool, or do you also continue to use the finder or other solutions at the same time?
• How is storing photos on an external drive handled in Aperture? Is it easy, or does it involve a lot of dragging stuff around and messing up your existing events/albums?
• Once photos are stored on an external.. how do you back them up in case that drive fails?
• On the Apple "iPhoto to Aperture" page, they say iPhoto and Aperture share their libraries. So what happens to photos Aperture has moved to an external drive, do they disappear from iPhoto?
• How's the speed? I always found iPhoto to be slow and unresponsive. I do have the 13" MBP from 2010 (2.4 Ghz, Intel Core 2 Duo) but it does everything else smoothly so I fail to see what is so intense about iPhoto to justify the poor performance.
I plan to upgrade to a new MBP, so maybe this is a moot point.
• Is importing all my old photos gonna be pretty straightforward? I'd assume Aperture will take the dates on the files, rather than the date I import them.
• Since I never used iPhoto much, I don't get the difference between an Event and an Album- though I assume that events are for separating photo dumps (say, your visit to italy and your skiing trip) and albums are for combining an arbitrary set of photos (for instance your best travel photos featuring images from italy and the skiing trip among others), so when you delete one from an album, the image is still in the event, but if you delete from an event, it goes to the trash?... is this correct?
• any other advice you may have
Thanks!

I will comment on some of the items and exclude the external drive questions as I use a 'Managed' library on the internal drive.
• Is Aperture your primary photo organisation tool, or do you also continue to use the finder or other solutions at the same time?
I use Aperture specifically for organizing, viewing and enhancing images from my camera (with one proviso noted at end of this section). Since I use Photoshop and Illustrator to create composites and other graphic images, I keep that type of work outside of Aperture and use Bridge to view those in the finder disk structure. Basic line of thought here is just like iTunes is for music files, Aperture is for camera image files.
Although I could hold composite PSD files from Photoshop inside the Aperture library, I don't simply because I don't know if Apple may decide not to support those fully in the future. I used to keep PSD files in the library, but moved away from that practice.
Note - the proviso mentioned above is that I do have one Project that contains imported composites and rasterized Illustrator files that I wish to sync with iDevices. This is the only place I keep anything other than JPEG or RAW original camera files in the library.
• How's the speed? I always found iPhoto to be slow and unresponsive. I do have the 13" MBP from 2010 (2.4 Ghz, Intel Core 2 Duo) but it does everything else smoothly so I fail to see what is so intense about iPhoto to justify the poor performance.
I plan to upgrade to a new MBP, so maybe this is a moot point.
Aperture's speed depends on what you are doing in the program. Importing many images can take a little time, but no more so than other programs (e.g., Lightroom or even Bridge - which has to build it's cache). Face detection can take some time if you have a lot of faces in the images, but once it completes it is done.
Making adjustments to images can be quick in most of the adjustment bricks and HUD's, although; the retouch and skin softening brushes can become slower when you are adding a lot of local adjustments. This is no different than in Lightroom or Adobe Camera RAW when using brushes. Photoshop actually edges out these programs if you use layers and masks when brushing as far as processing speed goes, but that takes time to create a layer > fill > brush adjustment. Since Aperture does the masking for you on the fly, the speed is pretty much a wash.
Note - if iPhoto is slow and unresponsive on your machine, it may be due to something in the library database being the issue. However, it seems that most software creators (Apple, Microsoft, Adobe, etc.) always want to take advantage of the leading edge hardware when possible, which can lead to depleted performance in underpowered machines. With your machine, I would probably look at the library first aid items to improve performance though as iPhoto should be able to run decently.
• Is importing all my old photos gonna be pretty straightforward? I'd assume Aperture will take the dates on the files, rather than the date I import them.
Importing is easy and you have a number of options. Aperture will read the metadata of the image files and if the date and time are there, you can use that as the naming scheme if you wish. I would suggest reading the bit about file naming presets here:
http://documentation.apple.com/en/aperture/usermanual/index.html#chapter=4%26sec tion=6%26tasks=true
I will leave the external drive ideas to others who run a reference library as they will have much better information than I can provide.
• Since I never used iPhoto much, I don't get the difference between an Event and an Album- though I assume that events are for separating photo dumps (say, your visit to italy and your skiing trip) and albums are for combining an arbitrary set of photos (for instance your best travel photos featuring images from italy and the skiing trip among others), so when you delete one from an album, the image is still in the event, but if you delete from an event, it goes to the trash?... is this correct?
In either iPhoto or Aperture, you have to import image before the programs know about them and therefore before you can work with them in the program. iPhoto uses 'Events' to hold imports and Aperture uses 'Projects'. They are really the same thing - a container for the imported images.
In both programs, Albums are manually created collections of 'aliases' to the imported images that reside inside the Events / Projects. If you delete an image alias in an Album, it only removes the link to the image in the Event / Project. If on the other hand you delete the imported image from the Event / Project, then it will remove the image as well as any aliases to that image that you have created in Albums.
In both programs, if you delete an image from the Event / Project where it resides, it will go to the program's internal Trash first. If you then emtpy that internal Trash via command, it will go to the Finder trash. Note - you can put an image back from the program's internal Trash without re-importing. If you send to the Finder trash, you will need to re-import the image if you want to replace it.
Both programs also incorporate 'Smart Albums' which are created using filtering criteria and remain dynamic. Meaning any current image that meets the filter criteria will be shown as well as any future image that meets said criteria (either via import, ranking, keyword, adjustment, etc.).
Note - the library structures in both programs don't really mirror the file structure on disk. While you can try to set it up that way (and many users may well do that) - I just felt it was too time consuming for me. So I just use Aperture like I do iTunes. Camera image in > organize > enhance as needed > enjoy.
One thing in Aperture that is really nice is a feature called 'Quick Preview Mode'. With the click of a button or a keyboard press, you can tell Aperture not to worry about rendering an adjustable version and just show you the image as it currently is. Really great for cruising the images. Just remember to switch off the Quick Preview Mode when you want to make adjustments.
http://documentation.apple.com/en/aperture/usermanual/index.html#chapter=5%26sec tion=7%26tasks=true
Hope that helps.

Similar Messages

  • Advice for Basic Non-Professional Home Recording Studio

    I am new to Mac (2 months) but am interested in setting up a VERY basic recording studio at home using Garageband to record primarily voice only, plus maybe a single instrument (non-digital Dulcimer) in the future. Main purpose is to record a single acappella voice to create 4 part harmony by individually recording harmony tracks one at a time. Final output will be to use the song files in Slideshows and iDVD movie projects. Also will plan on burning music CDs of the songs for family members and non-commercial use.
    So... no need for a major budget or high level professional equipment. I have used my Intel iMac's internal mic for recording test songs as I learn my way around garageband. Internal mic works pretty well but I am wanting a little more control of ambient sounds and possibly some voice boost. I have been reading the forums fairly extensively and have some equipment in mind already but would appreciate experienced input and suggestions from the forum members.
    My current equipment ideas are:
    Shure M57 Cardioid Dynamic Mic - $89 Amazon
    Shure A2WS Windscreen -$10 Amazon
    On-Stage Stands Tripod Mic Stand with Boom -$23.55 Amazon
    XLR to XLR Microphone Cable - $8 Amazon
    M-Audio DMP3 Dual Mic Pre and Direct Box $160 zZounds (if I just need a mic preamp)
    M-Audio Fast Track US44010 USB with Session Software - $89 Amazon (if I need an audio interface)
    Since I am certainly not a recording expert and have never setup anything like this before, I could use honest input regarding what my studio needs are for the planned purpose as stated above.
    If I have read forum articles correctly, using an external dynamic mic such as the Shure M57 will require that I get either a preamp or audio interface that can bring the mic signal up to a compatible level with the Line input jack on my iMac?
    Is there any advantage to getting an audio interface instead of just a preamp for the recording purposes I have planned?
    If I do decide to add the Dulcimer instrument, since it is non-digital I would just need a second mic to add its input into the iMac using either the second XLR input on the M-Audio preamp or the audio interface?
    Am I overlooking any obvious equipment, cables, hookups I will need for the simple voice recording planned?
    Any comment on the prices listed above and better sites to purchase equipment from?
    I know this is a lot of questions. Appreciate any comments, input or ideas that your experience can offer. Thanks!

    Well I just ordered the Samson C01U Recording / Podcasting Pack from Amazon for $145. Includes the mic, clip, 10ft USB mic cable, MD5 Desktop mic stand, SP01 Shockmount, Cakewalk's Sonar LE software and a nice aluminum protective carrying case. For the price I figure I can't go too far wrong and seems like a good entry level setup into basic home recording. Thanks for the info on this USB mic. I will probably download the Samson free software since I have read that can solve some issues with the gain.
    Hopefully I can report back in a week or so and give an update on how its working on my iMac.
    Thanks for your help!

  • Photos app vs Aperture, for adepts?

    Hi guys,
    Are all Aperture adjustment tools available to a semi-adept like myself who migrates to the Photos app? Can I adjust my images in Photos to the same level of precision and have as many options (and stay within the Apple universe), or do I have to look elsewhere, like Lightroom? I need high-end software.
    I'm offered a Beta version, but not sure whether it's for me. BTW, I have just installed Yosemite and am keeping my fingers crossed.
    Thanks,
    Raphael

    Hi Raphael,
    With the _coming_ demise of Aperture, users are either:
    - staying with Aperture for a bit: it works well; migrating the database is, _at best_, tricky, incomplete, and inefficient; Aperture will continue to work well under Yosemite for as long as you have a Mac running Yosemite, or
    - using another program/programs for the digital asset management and digital camera image editing that they used to do in Aperture.
    Those who are moving are either:
    - putting only or mostly new/recent digital camera files into another program(s), and developing a workflow with the other program(s), or
    - porting all of their Originals, all of their adjusted Versions, and as much of the database as possible into another program.
    The other programs that are most often mentioned as being useful to Aperture users are:
    - Adobe's Lightroom.  Functional overlap with Aperture is nearly 100%.  Widely used.  More support and resources than you can use.  Aperture users general don't like being constrained by a modal interface, and don't like the actual interface.
    - Capture One Pro.  Functions similar to Aperture.  Well-liked by those who use it.  Strong editing tools.  Less strong digital asset management tools.  Very much smaller installed user base.  Imho, a more Aperture-like experience than LR.
    - Apple Photos for OS X.  Properly understood as the successor program to iPhoto (it is _not_ a successor to Aperture).  The design emphasis is on ease of use.  Adequate editing tools.  Strong but non-customizable digital asset management tools.
    All three feature non-destructive workflows (your digital camera files are never over-written).  All of them — like Aperture — store _the information needed to create new files_, rather than new files themselves.
    rshammaa wrote:
    If I am to switch, I would like to switch to a software that is elegantly thought out, that offers at least as much control as Aperture does, and that is widely supported and understood; and that has a forum like this one with competent people responding.
    An excellent list.  Imho: 
    - LR is the least elegant of the three.
    - LR and C1Pro offer as much editing control as Aperture.  Neither offers as much digital asset management options/utility.
    - All are (or will be) well supported.  LR is much more used and discussed, and has many more supporting materials available, than any of the others.
    - This forum provided — not just my opinion, and something I'm proud of — a rare combination of quick response, high-quality content, and little chaff.  There are (afaik) good forums for both LR and for C1Pro.
    HTH,
    —Kirby.

  • How do you choose which photos from Aperture for Apple TV screen saver?

    How do you choose which photos from Aperture for Apple TV screen saver?

    How do you choose which photos from Aperture for Apple TV screen saver?

  • Best use of Aperture for Graphic Designer

    I am new to Aperture. I had been browsing my images and photos in Bridge but doing all editing in Photoshop. In Aperture I will be using Referenced instead of Managed.
    I am a graphic designer, and edit, create, handle a large amount of images which is my primary usage. I also have need for comparison, as well as archival browsing of the work in one place. I am handling stock images, images I create, client jobs, etc. My jobs often involve photos sent to me by the client, and any photos I take (camera or iPhone) can be downloaded to camera app or even iPhoto, or Aperture now if one is better than the other.
    I am aware that Aperture does not mirror the Finder therefore when I make any changes (either in or outside of Aperture) or add anything to the folder in Finder, Aperture is not updated. Is there any way to have this be in sync with the content on the hard drive? Or just import the corrections back into Aperture? or does it matter?
    So I am wondering whether to just use Aperture for new image / photo editing and adjustments then export the corrected photos to the hard drive? Then for any future browsing of old content use Bridge?
    The other thought rolling around in my head is since I already keep a well-organized folder structure outside of Aperture, I don't know the need for re-organizing / moving things around in Aperture. I think it is great that it has the flexibility for that, and perhaps I would think of a reason for doing so.
    I am pondering the best use of this app for my purposes and would appreciate your experienced thoughts. Thank you!

    If you decide to use Aperture to edit your images then you should consider to use Aperture as Digital Asset Management System as well. Aperture is very versatile, and any mixed setup Finder - Aperture sooner or later will lead to trouble.
    You do not need to fall back on the Finder, if you want to use Photoshop or another Editor for editing in edition to Aperture. If you launch your Editor as external editor from inside Aperture, then the edits will be updated in the Aperture database, there is no extra synching necessary.
    Regards
    Léonie

  • Using Aperture for collecting and adjusting scans?

    I am in the process of digitizing a few thousand LPs, DATs and even CDs. I scan all the covers and use them in a FileMaker database as well as iTunes.
    Does it make any sense to get and use Aperture as the holding place for these? I know about Bridge and QPict and GraphicConverter has a nice browser too. But I'm thinking about the organizational abilities of Aperture as well as the nice image adjustment corrections it provides.
    Is this overkill? Does anyone here use Aperture for managing images other than RAW photos?

    Commentary (including mine) on this topic is at
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=753016&tstart=25
    Bridge I personally do not think much of.
    Since you own Photoshop and Filemaker I would just use those two apps, scanning into PSCS2 for editing then copying into FMP. Build your keywords in FMP and have each image have a unique I.D. number. The full resolution scans live elsewhere, identified by the I.D. number.
    Put each image into a FMP container field, but before copying into FMP first reduce the image size as much as possible for your needs to keep the DB as small as possible. Do note that once you start the process you cannot make the images larger; you need to go find the original for that.
    FMP 8 has a way to reference images without importing them but I have not used it yet. That may be appropriate for your purposes so you should check it out.
    -Allen Wicks

  • HT4906 just purchased aperture for my new macbook pro, do i know have to purchase again for my desktop?

    just purchased aperture for my new macbook pro, do i now have to buy another copy for my desktop?

    Use the AppleID you originally used when you bought Aperture. If you have forgotten the password, activate it again at the My Apple ID page:
    (https://appleid.apple.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/MyAppleId.woa/)-iForgot,
    see this link:
          Apple ID: All about Apple ID security questions

  • IPhoto won't open and is asking me to upgrade Aperture (for $80). I've never purchased or used Aperture. How to I get around this?

    iPhoto won't open and is asking me to upgrade Aperture (for $80). I have never purchased or used Aperture. Does anyone know why this is happening and how I can get past this so that I can just use iPhoto?
    Thanks.

    Can you give us the exact error message you get?

  • Aperture for iPad

    I'd like to see a version of Aperture for iPad in the future. Anyway just a thought.

    It would need to be a cut down version as the iPad isn't powerful enough to support a lot of the functionality that is in Aperture on the Mac : http://www.apple.com/feedback/ipad.html

  • Aperture for my OX 10.6.8..?

    Why cant I buy Aperture for my Imac with OX10.6.8??? Have Apple being like the apes Microsoft? MUST I have the Mountain Lion when I am so satified with Leopard with many many apps and program I have buy for much MONEY and dont want to only put in the trash???????
    Make my day....
    Rolfino

    If Amazon is an option for you, you could get this:
    http://www.amazon.com/Apple-MB957Z-A-Aperture-3/dp/B002I0JKSS/ref=sr_1_1?s=softw are&ie=UTF8&qid=1349736305&sr=1-1&keywords=aperture+3
    Note - it says 'Only 1 left' as of this posting, so you may need to be quick.
    If you can purchase the retail disc (either at link or somewhere else), you could then update to 3.2.4 by downloading this update package:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1538
    That's as far as you can go on OS X 10.6.8, but it is not bad at all.

  • Photo organisation

    Hi - im thinking of switching to Aperture (from iPhoto) to collate my photos.
    Now.. I've always kept a backup of all my photos before I've imported them to iPhoto simply down to the fact that they get reorganised in such a strange folder structure that finding them again in the future (outside of iPhoto) would be a nightmare.
    If I switch to Aperture Im sure Id still keep those original backups but I was wondering how the whole Vault thing works? Can the Vaults be accessed without using Aperture?
    At the moment Im thinking of using Aperture for workflow and image editing but keeping all my photos organised in iPhoto - would this be a wise thing to do?
    Thanks for your help.

    Aperture's library, and Aperture's vault, are just folders. You can ALWAYS get the pictures out of them, without Aperture. You just need to control-click on the library and select "show package contents," rather than double-click on it, to get to the files.
    I do not think keeping your files in your iPhoto library and editing in Aperture is a nice workflow... you will have to import them into Aperture to do the editing.
    My recommendation is to import your stuff into Aperture, then make a full backup of your iPhoto library to a DVD or external disk and just keep it forever as a backup. Use Aperture from that point forward, and if you need more info on how to find the files outside of Aperture (really, this shouldn't be necessary in nearly every case), it's easy to do. You can even define a smart folder in the Finder which will immediately show you every image file in the Aperture library, and then save that smart folder in your Finder sidebar.

  • I have imported my I photo library into Aperture.  all the old i photo events are now in the aperture library showing number of photos but when clicked none display.  I can see the photos if i run the cursor over the project.  Help please.

    I imported my i photo library into aperture.
    I can see the i photo events in aperture library as events with the number of photos in each event.
    When you click events in the aperture library no photos appear although if you roll the cursor over the event icon it show the photos.  If you click on the event either on the event icon or in the library no photos appear.
    Help

    Check, if you have any filters set. The search fields in the Insector panel and the browser should be showing "All items" or "Showing All".
    The Browser search field could be set for each project and album individually, so you have to check it for each project.
    Regards
    Léonie
    For example: The projects count shows "20 items", but the browser is empty, because the project's filter is set to show only rejected items.

  • Aperture = iPhoto + Bridge Photo Downloader + Photoshop?

    I am considering to use Aperture to streamline my workflow but I wonder about its file management capability. Let me explain the details:
    I love iPhoto to browse, find and preview photos. It provides the most intuitive, easy and fast way for that. The interface is also nice. The photo-editing capability is negligible for me as I use Photoshop for this.
    But I really hate the way it manages imported photos as Rolls and keep everything hidden under the 'Package'. So instead, I use Adobe's Bridge Photo Downloader from Photoshop to download photos from my cameras/iPhone and I set it to organize the files into folders: year/year-month/date-time of the photos taken. Then I'd import them to iPhoto - but without copying the originals. So basically I create a Reference Library for my iPhoto. I then tag/assigning Keywords the photos accordingly (I have plenty of keywords assigned). I sometimes create Events or Albums too - especially great for showing photos on my computer to friends and family.
    Photoshop is set as the external app to edit photos so from iPhoto I can open the file in Photoshop (which I have been using for all my photo editing needs including RAW).
    From what I gathered so far, Aperture seems to be a more efficient alternative to process RAW photos, and I've been wanting to find an alternative to the iPhoto-Bridge-Photoshop method above. Basically I need a Photo App that can do all the following:
    1. Import original photos from cameras/iPhone and then automatically organize them chronologically (in folders of year/year-month/date-time of the photo taken) a la Bridge's Photo Downloader
    2. Tag/Keywords, create Events and Albums, and to Preview photos quickly a la iPhoto
    3. Edit RAW files without harming the original files a la Photoshop
    I wonder whether Aperture is suitable for the usage I described above?
    Thanks in advance for any inputs!

    Hi freefire,
    So Aperture can import photosfrom cameras/iPhone and automatically organize, rename and save them into folders outside of Aperture Library?
    You can rename files on each import. However, saving files is not Aperture's job. If you put the files wherever you want, and then import them into Aperture as referenced images, they stay where they are.
    Alternately, and this would be much more tedious, you could import them all into Aperture as managed photos, and then use Aperture to "relocate masters" to somewhere else. That's sort of like two steps where one (my first paragraph) would suffice.
    If you want to organize photos by year, that is the job of Aperture. However, that is the job of Aperture *within the confines of Aperture*. Aperture is built primary to help you organize your photos within its database. You can make smart albums to show you every photo from 2010, for instance. That smart album is meaningless in Finder because it is not a primary function of Aperture to help you organize outside of Aperture. Basically, if you want to use Aperture to make directory structures for Finder, you aren't using Aperture in the most effective way.
    When I edit a RAW file in Photoshop, Photoshop keeps the new setting within the RAW file itself without creating new file and I can go back and make further changes or revert back to original state - all in the file itself.
    Are you sure about that? I thought Photoshop used the sidecar XMP files for that sort of thing. I'm no expert, but there's generally no provision in the file formats (including RAW files) for "this is how you undo something." I don't use Photoshop like that, but it sounds fishy that Photoshop will choose to write new data to a RAW file, as RAW files are proprietary and will never be produced by anything but a camera. It sounds doubly fishy that it will also write *undo data* to a RAW file. Again, I'm no expert at Photoshop, but I am an expert at software engineering, and it sounds pretty strange and error-prone.
    http://forums.adobe.com/message/3359633
    Now, when I do that with Aperture, will Aperture then make a new copy of the RAW file to be kept in Aperture Library?
    Aperture will not make a new copy of a master (RAW or not) unless you explicitly duplicate it (and that is not what you are asking about). Aperture, being a Digital Asset Manager, will never modify your masters. (Except if you change the date/time and choose to modify the master.) This is unlike photo editors like Photoshop, which may manipulate their input files and save those changes to the same files. Aperture makes a version, which is a recipe for changing the appearance of your master.
    nathan

  • Am I correct that Photos does not support external editors? i.e., in Aperture, I click Photos Edit with.... and can open in Photoshop or various plug-ins. Changes are then automatically saved back to Aperture. Nonexistent in Photos?

    Am I correct that Photos does not support external editors? i.e., in Aperture, I click Photos > Edit with.... and can open in Photoshop or various plug-ins. Changes are then automatically saved back to Aperture. Nonexistent in Photos?

    Thanks Larry. That certainly gives me some understanding. Can't imagine I'm the only Aperture user with that concern, so I certainly hope Adobe and others will fill the void. Without that feature, Photos is pretty much a non-started for me.

  • Is there place in Aperture where a photo can be given  a different look, like a painted canvas, cartoon look, or other effects?

    Is there place in Aperture where a photo can be given  a different look, like a painted canvas, cartoon look, or other effects?

    Only by sending the photo to an external editor or using a plug-in, like Toonit (see ToonIt! For Aperture (Digital Anarchy)).
    The effects in Aperture (see the are very basic. Some simple effects Quartz Filter effects can be added by using Automator services, see my user tip here:
                     Using Quartz Filters with Aperture
    For example, using the ColorPencil effect:

Maybe you are looking for

  • Conversão de medida

    Pessoal, bom dia Estou em um projeto e me deparei com um problema no GRC quando a unidade de medida do XML é CNT (cento), criamos uma tabela "Z"de unidade de medidda (De  Para), onde informo que a unidade do xml - CNT é = a CEM no SAP. Fui no cadastr

  • Date time in XML message

    Hi All, How do i get the message datetime in the XML message. I want to handle this is iStudio instead of the application, since it should be for populated for both the published or subscribed applications. Don't want to modify the underlying applica

  • How to remove duplicate entries in OID due to an AD-OID bootstrap

    Don't worry about the "why" but there were changes made to the mapping file for an AD-OID synch and dipassistant commands mp and bootstrap run and now there are some duplicate entries for users in OID. The only difference between the duplicates for e

  • IPhone4 to Apple TV movie streaming problem

    Movies recorded using my iPhone stream no problem to Apple TV via Airplay but movies that have been downloaded seperately and loaded onto my iPhone and are stored in my iPod part of the iPhone do not have the Airplay icon to allow streaming. Any idea

  • Cd image viewer

    Hi all, Please help me, i want to know how can i read cd image, search for a topic in a cd image. Thanks and regards Afsal