Is ECC's enhpx(x=1,2,3,4) the same as PI's enhpx?

I get confused on this. Would you please help?
Thanks!

Hi Jennifer,
You would not have any confusion if you completely understand what an EhP is.
Here is what sap help says about Enhancement packages:
"SAP enhancement packages are optionally installed software
innovations for SAP . They include functional enhancements, industryspecific
functionality, and simplifications u2013 for example, to the user interface.
With enhancement packages, you can easily adopt ongoing SAP innovations
at a lower cost than full upgrades..."
ECC's enhancement pack will have additional functionality with respect to ECC 6.0 features whereas PI's EhPs will have its own additional functionality:
Read more here:
SAP Enhancement Package 1 for SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1
Regards,
Ravi Kanth Talagana

Similar Messages

Difference in Material availability date for ECC ATP check & for APO ATP check in the same order

Hi Gurus,
I have a question: on what basis material availability date is calculated in forward scheduling?
Eg:
For a customer GR hours are maintained in unloading point calendar in customer master and Customers are not CIF'ed across to APO.
GR hours are maintained for weekdays from 8:00 to 12:00 & 1:00 to 6:00.
In a sales order with two line items with Requested date today & plenty of stock on hand for two products( ECC & APO) where line 10 (product 1) triggers ECC ATP check & line 20 (product 2) triggers APO ATP check at same location (loc1).
RDD is today, material availability date for ECC ATP check (line 10) is today (working as expected) but where as the material availability date for APO ATP check (line 20)is pushed to next day by which for the same customer there are different delivery dates. And two delivery notes will be created & truck will be on road at different times for the same customer which is unacceptable.
What am I missing here to get the material availability date as today for forward scheduling? Please guide me on this.
Thanks,
Nihar

Hi Nihar
Though the logic you mentioned makes sense. I am confused here with the data you have provided:
UTC day
UTC time
CET day
CET time
UTC+6 day
UTC+6 time
RDD
30/04
17:24
30/04
7:24
30/04
23:24
MAD
30/04
17:24
30/04
7:24
30/04
23:24
Lod/GI
02/05
17:24
02/05
7:24
02/05
23:24
Del
12/05
17:24
12/05
7:24
12/05
23:24
Del
13/05
1:00
13/05
3:00
13/05
8:00
Load/GI
05/05
1:00
05/05
3:00
05/05
8:00
MAD
02/05
1:00
02/05
3:00
02/05
8:00
In the first row, the difference in RDD in UTC and UTC+6 is 6 hours. However, in the last three rows I can see the difference between UTC time and UTC+6 time is 7 hours. Would you know the reason to this? Also, in the first four rows, CET time = 7:24 which should had been 19:24. Please correct me if I am missing something here.
Thanks,
Parth Soneji

ECC and BW in the same system - Gotchas?

From the documents, and from the information from SAP, it appears that BW 3.5 can be installed into an ERP 2004 / ECC 500 system. Does anyone have any experience with this during the ECC 5 rampup?
I have a client that is considering this and would like to know of any gotchas before we hit them.
For instance the documents mention you need to tune the Oracle database with the parameter "star_transformation_enabled=true", which is normally used in a BW system. What impact, if any, will that have the ECC side of things?

Hi John,
Just to respond to your post and clarify some of the areas.
1. The mySAP ERP 2004 ECC 5.0 and it's internal SAP BW is not an MCOD implementation. The SAP BW is internal with the ECC (same instance, same database schema, and same database. Whereas MCOD is different instances, different schemas, but same database. One important point is that MCOD and mySAP ERP 2004 fully support three tier architecture.
2. MCOD was not recommended for a mix of OLTP and OLAP applications on all databases until recently (e.g. recommended for SAP R/3 Enterprise and mySAP SRM but not SAP R/3 Enterprise and SAP BW). This has recently changed where a combination of OLTP and OLAP is now supported: See http://service.sap.com/mcod or see SAP note 712777.
3. SAP BW Performance: In a mySAP ERP 2004 ECC 5.0 system with the internal SAP BW functionality active, the system must be configured for both the transaction processing and OLAP functions. This configuration must include load balancing if you have high usage. Without load balancing you are unable to target activities to specific servers or separate different user groups. Obviously if you have only one server load balancing is not available. It is strongly recommended to use the three system configurations for SAP ERP applications and SAP BW.
4. Automatic multiple Instance shutdown:
For MCOD this is not the case that shutting down one system in your MCOD installation will also shutdown your other MCOD systems; this only happens if you also close the database (remember it is the only part that this shared). The instances can be started and shutdown independently.
For the internal SAP BW within ECC 5.0 you have "one system" so if you shut it down, you really shut it down.
5. Impact of applying patches or doing client copies:
For MCOD systems, the systems are independent and can be patched and administered independently. The only common part is the database. The database maintenance and patching does affect all the connected MCOD systems. For processes like system copies, these are also independent of the other systems. Obviously if you share the same server for the different systems you need to take care with CPU and memory usage of these functions.
As SAP BW within ECC 5.0 is the same system, you have to patch the system all at once (recommendation is to use SP-Stacks). A SAP_BASIS support package applied to ECC is also applied to SAP BW at the same time. With regard to client copies, client copies are only supported for ERP 'OLTP' clients (not for the SAP BW client).
6. "The headaches just are not worth it....especially since server prices are low"
I would not totally agree with this comment. For mySAP ERP this low price server argument also works for adding more app servers to ERP and doing load balancing. The use of MCOD or the internal SAP BW within ECC will be made on a number of factors by the customer with different weighting being applied to each of the Pros and Cons.
The new "internal SAP BW within ECC 5.0" gives customer's system architects more options and increases the flexibility of the total solution in general (delivery of a centralized EDW, deliver of operation reporting, deliver of application or organization specific datamarts to name a few). With more options and flexibility, more decision points need to be reviewed and analyzed which can be a good thing.
I hope this helps,
Mike.

Can E-RECRUITING share the same box of ECC?

I always install E-RECRUITING on a dedicated server as an ABAP application. Then connect to its backend ECC.
Just curious, can I install E-RECRUITING on the same box where its backend ECC system is installed? ECC and E-RECRUITING will have
different SIDs but co-exist in one Oracle MCOD DB.
Further more, can E-RECRUITING and its backend ECC belong to the same SID but on different clients?
Thanks for help.

Yes and yes. The first scenario is comparable to I2-A and the second one to I2-B. See the application help for details.

BW and R/3 in the same box with a single instance ECC 5.0

Hi anybody using this scenario of having bw and r/3 in the same box....we are planing to consider in our project.
will be happy if anybody can provide me some help on this.
thanks and regards
neel

HI Neel Kamal,
I think its a better option to distinguish OLTP like R/3 or ECC and OLAP like BW rather on a single instance
from the above posts
Let us know if this holds good
Thanks,
Raj

PPDS: I have a setup matrix in SAP ECC 6.0, and want to transfer the same to APO using Core Interface.

PPDS: I have a setup matrix in SAP ECC 6.0, and want to transfer the same to APO using Core Interface. Has anyone done it before?

Hi Subhash,
Please open this link to see the details:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm70/helpdata/EN/89/bd3e42ce98033be10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
You perform the data transfer in the following sequence:
Plant
Setup groups
Work centers
Routings
You check the setup groups in SAP APO.
You create the setup matrixes in SAP SCM.
Thanks, Marius

ECC 6.0 and ECC 5.0 runing in the same Machine.

Hi Guys,
I have a challenge: Install a ECC 6.0 with HR and an ERP 5.0 on the same Machine and Operational System. Do you know some documentation, link or tips for this type of case? Do I need run something different than a normal installation?
Best Regards,
Jader Coelho.

Hi,
What OS are you going for....Windows / unix ?
Just make sure you have enough Memory CPU to facilitate both
and have enouge disk for the paging file.
Have you considered MCOD, and is there a reason why you want to run EEC6 and ECC5 why not just EEC6 for both.
Multiple Components in One Database (MCOD) [original link is broken]
Edited by: Mark Norman on Oct 16, 2009 5:22 PM

BD64 issue having ECC + BI on the same client

Hi there,
We do have a small instance having ECC and BI in the same System.
The ABAP RFC connection is fine and when Replicated in RSA1 Datasources from SourceSystem R3 went fine.
But I think we have an issue with the Idoc settings.
Went through the doc [http://ecohub.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/908836c3-7f97-2b10-4cb8-e6790361c152?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true] and found that when BD64 it asks me the Sender / Receiver to be different.
Though as mentioned in our case it is the same.
It is really needed to update these settings in BD64 when both systems are in the same System?
Thank you,
A.

Hi Asik,
Thank you for the reply.
Yes, that is right.
We access BW and R3 through the same logon.
I found the issue though !!
Would explain it in case someone faces a similar issue.
1- The ABAP RFC connection was fine.
    Tested and transfered the DataSources fine.
2 - though there was still an issue with table RSBASIDOC not showing Transfer Structure field.
Solution:
Read
     u2022     http://ecohub.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/908836c3-7f97-2b10-4cb8-e6790361c152?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
     u2022     Setting up Connection between BW and R3 for Data.pdf
     u2022     Step by Step on Changing ECC SourceSystem without affecting Datamodel Objects in BW.pdf
Followed the post:
Step by Step on Changing ECC SourceSystem without affecting Datamodel Objects in BW
1. Go to WE20 and check whether Partner profile T90CLNT090 exist in LS type,if not just add Parnter profile with same and save.
Partner profile Name: T90CLNT090
TYPE: LS
Give:
Ty: US
User: User Name
Lang: EN
and Save.
2. Again re-click on Partner Profile: T90CLNT090
you will see ,there will be some entries in Inbound & out Bound Tabs.
Delete the following from outbound:
1.RSRQST
Delete the following from inbound.
1.RSINFO
2.RSSEND
and save your partner profile.
3. now execute - RSA1, it will ask to active Workbench. Just activate it . it will work now.... Cheers.

Implementing ECC 6.0 for HCM as compared to the exisiting 4.7 system

We are currently on a 4.7 system without ESS / MSS and rather than technically upgrading to ECC 6.0 a new implementation is going to happen (due for many reasons, mainly finance). My concern is for the HCM parts of the implementation.
Can anyone advise on any items that should be completed to make sure this a success as well as make sure that there are no roadblocks for implementing ESS / MSS during or post go live and what other new functionality that can be leveraged?
My thoughts so far as the following:
- update all PA, OM, PY etc config in ECC 6.00 the same as in 4.7 - will this cover everything or are there additional tables to take care of?
- migration of data can be taken care of PA, OM data using LSMW's unless there is a better approach for this? such as org migration tools ettc
- Org structure must be correct with regards to reporting manager for ESS / MSS to function correctly - any other data items or risks to be taken care of for ESS / MSS implementation
- Main new functionality in 6.0. not in 4.7 I see as using of Adobe forms / webdynpro in MSS - what else can be leveraged?
Any thoughts you have would be greatly appreciated.
Many thanks,
Dannyboy

there is a lot of functionality available, and may processes available
I would recommend you to check the release notes of ESS MSS and ECC 600
ESS
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/80/7d6641df6c7f47e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
MSS
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/2e/5a5d45d9f24fbdb06be2ff53651c3e/frameset.htm

BI 7.0 and ECC 6.0 in the same server

Dear experts,
In my company the scenarion is like, we have installed ECC 6.0 in server where development work is going on.
Now we have requirement to implement the BI 7.0 in the same server as already BI content is existing in the same server.
My question is
Is it possible to implement the BI on the same server?
If yes, is it possible to extract the data from the development client on the same server where ECC 6.0 running?
If No, then what is the use of the BI contents in the ECC 6.0 server?
Regards,
SUD

Hi
> it possible to implement the BI on the same server?
Yes, why not? But that will be a separate SAP installation with different SID.
>If yes, is it possible to extract the data from the development client on the same server where ECC 6.0 running?
Yes, that is possible. Both the system will be having different Logical system name. You have to create a source system connection from ur BI to ECC system and then data extraction is possible.
>If No, then what is the use of the BI contents in the ECC 6.0 server?
BI Content in ECC is there to facilitate data extraction from ECC to BI. It would provide you the structure of data extraction. Presence of BI Cont does not mean a ECC system will be working as BI system.
Hope this clarifies your doubt.
Regards
Anindya Bose

BI and ECC 6.0 installation in the same server

Hello SAP Experts,
I am given a task of installing BI 7.0 and ECC 6.0 in the same server. Can someone suggest me of what are all the Do's and Don'ts in this scenario and what is the hardware requirements.
Thanks & Regards
Vanitha

Hi,
For installing BI, you have to install Netweaver.
You already have ECC 6.0 in the System.
As a part of BI system, you will be extracting data from ECC Ssytem and loading in BW System.
Hence if your requireement is like data is loaed in the the BW System every one hour, it will slow down the ECC System.
In future you may need to do some OS patch update, database patch update which is not required in ECC, but it will effect both systems
I have not seen any scenario where OLTP and OLAP System are in the same box
But if you are just doing for learning purpose and you are doing it in your sand box , that should be fine

XI and PI connecting to the same ECC system

I had read this thread XI and PI
Currently, our ECC is connecting to XI. In Integration Engine config of ECC, role of business system is "Application System". In XI, role is "Integration Server". If we need to add a PI and connect to ECC, what should be done or what is the workaround that can make XI and PI connecting to ECC at the same time?
Thanks.

Hi Mark,
Thanks for the suggested blog, I need some time to study this. I do not understand why 'standard' integration server is defined as 'Application System'.
I also need to study the limitation of SPROXY on SAP application server refer to only one XI/PI system. May be the issue of my scenario is not just connecting multiple XI/PI to ECC system.
The scenario:
Maximo MEA 6.2 <-> XI 3.0 <--> ECC (current)
Maximo MEA 7.5 <--> PI 7.x <--> ECC (to be added)
Any input or experience sharing? Thanks.
Regards,
Donald

Scenario-ECC system is down but still can run the warehouse operations in EWM

Hi,
We all know that EWM is an independent system , even if ECC system is down still we can run the warehouse operations in EWM.
However what happens once ECC system has got up, how would all the pending EWM goods movements updated in ECC?
Will it be ending with queue errors? Or is there any manual process required to process those movements to update ECC.
Thanks,
Ganesan

Hello Ganesan,
If the system is down, Queues will be stopped processing for that period of time. Once the ECC is up, the queues will start processing. If not, you can reset the status of queues, then they will be processing immediately.
Regards,
Sathish

Reg: If changes done in SAP BO Analysis office, then Changes can be done in SAP BW in respective targets. But, is it possible to do the same changes in SAP ECC? How?

Hello Everyone,
If any changes are done in SAP BO Analysis office, then the change can be done in the SAP BW in the respective Targets.
But how can we do the changes in the SAP ECC ? Is it possible to do the changes in the tables ?
Any answer is appreciable
Regards,
Karteek

We are using the "Input ready Bex query", in order to modify the values in "BO Analysis office".
ECC BI BO Analysis office
1 -------------> 1 ----------> 1 ------
 |
 | (Now Data is changed in Analysis office from 1 to 2)
 |
(?) <-------------- 2 <---------- 2 <-----
(Will it be updated in ECC)
(Diagram Explanation)
From ECC we can load the data (Consider Value-1) to SAP BI and from SAP BI we can load the data to BO analysis office.
So, now if we change the data in BO Analysis office (Value-1 changed to Value-2)..
Now the data is changed in SAP BI to Value-2.
So what about the data in ECC ? Whether it is changed or not?
Please provide us a real time business Scenario..
Thanks,
Karteek

RFC receiver adapter issue - ECC side we are seeing blank data for the RFC

Hi All,
We are using Receiver RFC adapter to call a custom RFC (Synchronous call). It was working fine, but recently RFC was modified (They added new fields). We re-imported the RFC into ESR and also modified the mapping to reflect the new RFC strucuture. Now when we execute the RFC, at the ECC side no data is beeing seen. On the PI side we see data in sxmb_moni. It looks fine. However we don't see anydata in ECC. We did full cache refresh but it did not help.
Please let me know if anyone has any thoughts on this issue.
Thanks
-Pradeep

I enabled the the RFC adapter trace in PI. It appears like adapter is not sending the structure and tabled that are populated. IT is sending only 230 bytes. Any clue why would rfc adapter drop the tables and structures??
FUNCTION Z_FI_AA_BAPI_ASSET_CHANGE
 handle = 2
 parameter = <null>
 parameter = <null>
 tables = <null>
>>>> [2] <unknown> EXT <ac: 6> >>> FLUSH (READ) (88578752)
Send RFCHEADER [2]: 01/BIG/IEEE/SPACE-U2/52494850
Send UNICODE-RFCHEADER [2]: cp:4102/ce:IGNORE/et:6/cs:2/rc:0x00000023
UUID: send_rfcuuid B6D708F0-B946-11E0-BC35-EEB4AC138154
UUID: RfcCallNew send the uuid to the partner:B6D708F0-B946-11E0-BC35-EEB4AC138154
>>>> [2] <unknown> EXT <ac: 7> >>> WRITE (88578752)
000000 | 01010008 01020105 04010002 01010103 |................
000010 | 00040000 020B0103 0106000B 04010002 |................
000020 | 01060200 00002301 06000700 1A003100 |......#.......1.
000030 | 37003200 2E003100 39002E00 31003200 |7.2...1.9...1.2.
000040 | 39002E00 38003400 07001100 02004500 |9...8.4.......E.
000050 | 11001200 06003600 34003200 12001300 |......6.4.2.....
000060 | 08003700 30003000 20001300 08001800 |..7.0.0. .......
000070 | 73006100 70007000 69002D00 64006500 |s.a.p.p.i.-.d.e.
000080 | 76002D00 64003100 08000600 28007300 |v.-.d.1.....(.s.
000090 | 61007000 72006400 62002D00 64006500 |a.p.r.d.b.-.d.e.
0000a0 | 76002D00 64003000 5F004400 52003300 |v.-.d.0._.D.R.3.
0000b0 | 5F003000 30000605 140010B6 D708F0B9 |_.0.0...........
0000c0 | 4611E0BC 35EEB4AC 13815405 14050200 |F...5.....T.....
0000d0 | 00050200 0B000600 36003400 32000B01 |........6.4.2...
0000e0 | 02003200 5A005F00 46004900 5F004100 |..2.Z._.F.I._.A.
0000f0 | 41005F00 42004100 50004900 5F004100 |A._.B.A.P.I._.A.
000100 | 53005300 45005400 5F004300 48004100 |S.S.E.T._.C.H.A.
000110 | 4E004700 45010203 37000003 37051400 |N.G.E...7...7...
000120 | 10B6D708 F0B94611 E0BC35EE B4AC1381 |......F...5.....
000130 | 54051401 3100E62A 54482A03 00E60000 |T...1..TH.....
000140 | 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 |................
000150 | 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 |................
000160 | 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 |................
000170 | 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 |................
000180 | 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 |................
000190 | 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 |................
0001a0 | 00000000 00000000 00000000 73617070 |............sapp
0001b0 | 692D6465 762D6431 5F445049 5F313839 |i-dev-d1_DPI_189
0001c0 | 34303530 00000000 00000000 63303432 |4050........c042
0001d0 | 35313733 62393435 31316530 38373562 |5173b94511e0875b
0001e0 | 30303030 30303163 65366132 00000000 |0000001ce6a2....
0001f0 | 02C04251 73B94511 E0875B00 00001CE6 |..BQs.E...[.....
000200 | A2B6D708 F0B94611 E0BC35EE B4AC1381 |......F...5.....
000210 | 54000000 01000000 002A5448 2A0131FF |T........TH.1.
000220 | FF0000FF FF000000 00000000 00000000 |................
 >> CPIC native call CMSEND [2] convid: 88578752 14:23:39,159
 << CPIC native call CMSEND [2] convid: 88578752 rc: 0 14:23:39,159

Is ECC's enhpx(x=1,2,3,4) the same as PI's enhpx?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for