Is gonna work the new Intel Iris Graphics with After Effects in GPU mode (ray traced) in a future?

I want to know if it will be posible... I don't want to think that lots of users (with intel iris MacBook's) are out of this option.

No.
The ray-traced 3D renderer is built on top of the Nvidia OptiX library, which requires CUDA.
Details:
http://blogs.adobe.com/aftereffects/2012/05/gpu-cuda-opengl-features-in-after-effects-cs6. html

Similar Messages

  • Is the GeForce GTX 760 compatible with After Effects CC?

    Hi!
    The tech specs page doesn't have the 760 listed as a compatible Graphics Card, but will it still work.
    Wouldn't it be better then the other listed cards?
    Thanks,
    Joshua Northeast

    The GTX 760 and several other cards have been added to the list of cards that After Effects will use for GPU acceleration of the ray-traced 3D renderer in the After Effects CC (12.1) update, coming in October.
    See this page for details:
    http://adobe.ly/AE_CC_12dot1_details

  • New problem of '' Replace with after effect composition ''

    Hi
    i'm a new user of adobe premiere pro , and i have really a big problem on it and i tired of searching about solution but with out any result , the whole problem is when i select a footage and right-clicking from the premiere timeline , the option of '' Replace with atfer effect composition '' is empty and this sentence has a Gray color wich means you can't open it .. i have  the CC demo versions for the both of atfer efect & premier , but i want to know if there is a solution for this or its normle just i have to buy the licence
    plzzz i need a solution :/

    Did you set AE as the default application for after effects projects (AEP) format?

  • Should I exchange my I Book G4 for the New Intel IMAC

    I just bought an G4 i book on 12-31 and maybe i should have waited untill after the conference to get a mac computer, but i really wanted the G4, and i been wanting to switch from PC to mac for a while, I guess i just chose the wrong time. I am not sure what to do now, should i take back my ibook and get an imac? I feel really dumb about getting the G4, even though it is great. I know they are going to come out with an intel one this year. Can anyone help me out and let me know what i should do? Any advice would be great. Thanks
    I Book G4   Mac OS X (10.0.x)  

    Hi Daniel,
    To your response about the programs not being able to work with the new Intels is true for the most part.Apple Developer Connection for a long time has had links on how to change program's code into Universal Binary. Many companies have switched their programs over to Universal Binary. Microsoft Office is available to work on the PowerMac. The PowerMac also works with FileMaker Pro and Quicken. I don't use MS Office or anything made by MS because I have iWorks '05, which is even better. It is fully compatible will MS Office.
    I am getting a PowerMac solely because I need a faster and more powerful machine. I have 8000 photos (2000 on iBook 6000 on iMac) and I can't fit and edit them all at the same time. I need the portability and the power to run the "pro" applications.
    I hope that helps,
    Jon
    PS I wouldn't say upgrade it to an Intel Mac unless you need to. The new Intel computers come with MS Office Test Drive, so I am guessing it works

  • Dynamic Link/ Replace with After Effects Composition between Premiere Pro CC to After Effects CC won't work. Says "importer reported a generic error"

    Trying to use the "Replace with After Effects Composition" to use Warp Stabilizer on a clip and transfer it back into Premiere Pro CC. The action is not  "grayed out" it allows me to click it and it opens up After Effects, then asks to open a new composition, but it doesn't open up the clip for me to work on it.
    Also is the Dynamic Link and Replace with After Effects Composition the same thing?
    Ive watched several tutorials and read threads but I still don't understand who to fix my problem.
    I have both CC versions of PP and AE, if that makes any difference.

    You have not provided any system information, no details about your sequence settings, your footage and whatnot. Nobody can even guess what may be going on.
    Mylenium

  • Replace With After Effects Composition... What's the Point...???

    Hi...
    So I have a timeline that I want to CC in AE....
    I select all the clips and choose "Replace with After Effects Compostion"
    PPRO correctly initiates an AE launch which then correctly makes a Composition with all my clips in it...
    Now, ALL the clips, while there in the AE Comp, DONT have the clip names I gave them in the Timeline in PPRO.
    They have the original clips names. Like MVI_9987.MOV which is totally misleading....
    Why on earth would PPRO NOT adopt the names of the clips in the timeline to the after effects compostion ??
    This is my major gripe with Adobe, you have so many GREAT and VERY Innovative but totally NON-Thought-Thru' features. It is killing me.
    This here among so manu other things is what makes your CS Suite (Aside from Photoshop) a Pro-Sumer Solution....
    A professional solution is NOT regarded professional because it has fancy features, it is regarded as such because the features it HAS have been WELL contemplated and integrated.
    I hope your CS6 version is going to take care of all those small problems...
    But then again, been having those hopes since CS4

    The bit I do not understand is why the need to rename the Clips and how that becomes of value in either PPRO or AEFX (or Resolve or elsewhere).
    Say YOU have to colorize my movie that I am currently cutting. The timeline consists of about 630 clips, derived from about 300 sources (Clips in Bin)
    The clips in the bin have the original rush name... Thus BLABLA.mov... This way you can alsways go back and in time. Adobe has integrated something called METADATA and THAT should be use to describe scenes, shots etc.
    That is why adobe made a BIG deal out of integrating Metadata..
    Now, in above scenario let us assume that you CC in AfterEffects. I'll send you the project via overnight on  a hard drive, and tomorrow you open it either via Importing the Project into AE or by opening it in PPRO and hitting replace with AE comp.
    You going to get 630 individual layers in the AE Com. The layer names are going to be derived from the source clips. So you are going to be looking at MAX 300 different names. YOU SHOULD be looking at 630 different names. But you are not.
    AE will ignore the PPRO clipsnames and just generically name the layers by the source clip name.... Again... even if I had renamed all the source clips in the bins ONE source clip could be contain 7 differen subclips in the whole timeline.. ALL THOSE clips would share the same name... Thus nothing to do with it label..
    So, now I have YOU on the phone, breathing down my neck, trying to communicate to me WHICH clip had THAT cool sunrise effect. I DID label it Sunrise... But PPRO and AE messed that up... So I go....
    Hoooold On, Shooter..... Let me just open the timeline and count from left to right.... 1,2,3,4,5,6.... 459,,,, Ohhhh there it is... Clip number 459 from the left... Have fun Counting clips.
    I hope you understand what I am saying, if not... OK...  at least then I can understand why you DONT understand -)   (No Disrespect Meant)
    You make the following over dramatic claim about how fast your workflow is ....but to me, that would be slow and imprecise.
    Based on your questions I can understand why you would feel that way.
    I bet you are one of those guys thinking FCPx's event library sucks ;-)
    Can you tell me how you name the clips in the workflow you describe here...?
    I select the clip, hit ctrl-r (rename clip), give it a name and move on to the next...

  • Will my printer and scanner work with the new intel mac?

    My first post.. so I hope i am in the right place! (was in wrong place last attempt!)
    I want to buy the new intel...but I would like to know for sure if it will work with my scanner and printer.
    Printer is Epson Stylus Photo 2100 and the scanner is Microtek ScanMaker 4900.
    I have emailed both Epson and Microtek... phoned Epson.. and I still do not know the answer.
    The responses were
    "At this point in time with have been given no information on whether our printer drivers will work or not....".
    "Yes it will work with OSX 10.4"
    "As you know this new intel chip has just hit the market. This particular configuration is in the alpha stage of testing. As of now there has not been any reports or customer correspondence of any concerns."
    I have been scanning these posts and it seems that only the operating system is relevant? If anyone could help I would appreciate it. I am finally able to replace my old, old, well loved G4 but am worried I will make the wrong decision.

    Thanks all for the helpful comments. I am getting closer to going out and buying the intel. As for the Canon printer... its not really an option for me, since the Epson cost me more than the computer will! But I will keep it in mind for the future. And do you think this applies to digital cameras as well Tomzo? I have been considering buying my first digital.. and thought the pentax might be best, since it apparently can use the lenses from my film camera.
    Thanks again all..I will keep checking the apple site list and the web sites as suggested by you.
    Power Mac G4 (AGP graphics)   Mac OS X (10.4.4)  

  • Does itunes work with  the new intel core duo processor?

    i want to go buy a new laptop and the one I have in mind has the new intel core duo T2300 or the T2400 processor. Can i still download itunes onto this computer? Does it meet the requirments becuase the download page says you need a pentium or BETTER? The new macs are putting them in their computers, but will the windows and intel duo be able to support the itunes application?

    are you asking if it is compatible meaning will it
    install/run or are you asking if flash is
    optimized to take advantage of this particular setup?
    --> **Adobe Certified Expert**
    --> www.mudbubble.com
    --> www.keyframer.com
    BAT06 wrote:
    > I am currently looking at up grading to a new pc but
    have heard that the new
    > Intel Core Duo Processor isn't compatible with Flash or
    Studio 8?
    >
    > Has anyone got a PC running with an Intel Core Duo
    Processor, and if so does
    > it work with Flash and or Studio 8?
    >

  • MacBook Pro Retina 13 with Intel Iris graphics breaks Premiere Pro CC hardware output

    Hi all,
    I just recently got a MacBook Pro 13 Retina, to use for basic editing as a secondary system to my iMac. The MacBook Pro sports a Intel Iris integrated graphics system. When I use GPU acceleration (Open CL), my Blackmagic or AJA Thunderbolt I/O outputs solid green. When I switch to software only, video plays back fine.
    I'm running Premiere Pro CC 2014 on Mac OS 10.9.4. I've read that Adobe is now optimized for Intel Iris graphics using Open CL, but why is mine not working when using external video IO?
    Anyone run into this?

    Does switching off Wifi make a difference?
    In UK and USA (and quite a few other places) you have 14 days from purchase to get a refund or replacement - no questions asked.  If there is nothing running then this does sound to be depleting rather fast.  My late 2013 13" MBP retina gives me about 10 hours using Pages (several documents open) and e-mail only.
    Get a replacement and see if you get the same problem.

  • Confusion In Intel Iris Graphics?

    Hi, I am willing to buy a new Macbook Pro but I am having confusion in choosing. First of all I would like to know what is Intel Iris Graphics? This is in new retina macbooks and Intel Iris Pro Graphics is in 15 inch models, whats the difference? I want macbook pro with a graphics card because I develop Unity3D games and unity crashes because graphics memory is not enough in view port rendering. If I buy new 13 inch macbook pro with Intel Iris Graphics , will this problem be solved? Or I need to buy macbook pro with external graphics card such as that of NVdia? Thanks.

    Intel Iris is the new integrated GPU included in the 13-inch MacBook Pro with Retina display, and it provides better performance than older Intel graphic cards.
    Instead, the 15-inch MacBook Pro with Retina display includes a slightly better Intel Iris Pro GPU. Both GPUs have got 1 GB of video memory, but if you need the best performance for your apps, go for the 15-inch MacBook Pro with Retina display, which also comes with a NVIDIA GPU that will provide you the best performance

  • Does the standard Intel HD Graphics 4000 in the 13 inch Macbook pro stand up to other graphics cards with dedicated memory ( 1GB of memory for instance)?

    Does the standard Intel HD Graphics 4000 in the 13 inch Macbook pro stand up to other graphics cards with dedicated memory ( 1GB of memory for instance)? I need a laptop for college and the Engineering program suggests a dedicated video card with minimum 1GB of video memory.

    I have a Intel HD 4000 in my Mac Mini (late 2012), and it's okay for what I need it.
    However:
    - there were a few issues with flickering on the video output to external monitors. These were solved through a firmware update that came with OSX 10.8.3 - for the majority of the users. There is apparently still a small group of users that still has issues. You can read long threads about this here:
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4472316?start=0&tstart=0
    and here
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4490924?start=0&tstart=0
    So for most of us (me included) this issue is solved, but it seems that certain displays / monitors don't work well with the intel HD4000, don't know if there is a pattern or a list of monitor models...
    - there was an issue with the color calibration on the HDMI output. No matter how much you tried to calibrate, the results remained unsatisfying. All light colors were crushed to white, wrong contrast, ...
    You can read about this here:
    http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1482487
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4480354?start=0&tstart=0
    The same firmware update improved this a little, good enough for me, but I can imagine it's not good enough if you do graphic work and need reliable colors from your monitor. On HDMI output, the thunderbolt/MDP output is fine. So it's mainly a dual monitor setup issue.
    If it's for graphic work, I'd go for a Mac Book Pro with dedicated GPU !

  • Can someone predict the spec's of the new Intel Mini's to current Mini's?

    How much of a drastic or slight change will there be. If someone could just predict the spec's of the new intell's then I might just wait.. I don't want to get a product now that will be considerably outdated in about 5months now.. Will there be a big graphic power increase, processor power increase or what? Also, do you think that Apple will still have the Intel Mini's be at a great price? Will Intel Mini's be 500-700 USD's like the older PowerPC ones?
    Thanks!

    stlouis --
    It is against the terms of use to speculate here.
    No one knows the answers to the questions you are asking.
    If they did, they could not discuss it here.

  • TransparentDock 2.3.6 and the new Intel iMac

    Just a quick question ?
    Does anyone know if this works with the new Intel iMac
    TransparentDock 2.3.6
    Thanks
    Mark

    Has anyone expirenced TransparentDock not working after installing the new OS X 10.4.5 update?
    iMac G4   Mac OS X (10.4.4)  

  • Software availability for the new intel processors

    Does anyone have an idea of when the Logic Pro/Express or Reason version for the new intel processors will be available?? or what software does already work with this technology, other than GarageBand?? Thanx!

    Logic Pro and Express 7.2 are available now, and are universal binaries.
    Propellerheads hasn't announced a timeframe for a UB version of Reason, so no one knows.

  • Is intel iris graphics good?

    I am considering bying a macbook pro retina 13", but im skeptical to the intel iris graphics. Now i have a macbook pro mid-2012, that i have NVIDIA Geforce
    GT 650M 512 MB, and i think thats quite good, but is intel iris graphics good? are they better, or are they worse?

    the 2012 has 2 Graphic cards, the Intel HD Graphics 4000 as well as the nVidia GT 650M.   The iris pro is a little better than the Intel HD Graphics 4000.
    Whether this will be sufficient depends on if you plan on doing any video editing or gaming? If so then you would want the better graphics card.

Maybe you are looking for