Is Informatica 9.0.1 with hot fix 2 is supported with AIX 7.1

Informatica is not an Oracle product - pl ask in the Informatica forums - https://community.informatica.com/index.jspa

Similar Messages

Installed WIndows 7 & correct bootcamp drivers, windows will not activate "hot fix" or "Support drivers"

Hello, i hope someone can help,
i have repeated this whole process 3 times already, it has taken 8 strait hours of my time and i still have had no success.
QUICK SUMMERY
To put it simply, After windows is up and running on my mac, the wireless network wont work, so i cannot download the hot fix, and the support driver files from bootcamp will not open because it says they are not "32 Valid" ?. But im using a 64bit disk.
The wireless network adaptor automatically doesn't work on windows right after installation,
so i had to load the Hot Fix onto an SD card along with the bootcamp drivers, then open the hotfix file in windows.
The first time i was able to install the fix, windows restarted and installed the update, logged back on... and nothing changed.
At that point i attempted to open the "Setup" file in the bootcamp support folder, and an error message came up saying it wasn't valid.
LONGER EXPLANATION OF MY COMPLETE PROCESS: (to cancel out any questions)
i was able to find my support driver from here:
http://swscan.apple.com/content/catalogs/others/index-leopard-snowleopard.merged -1.sucatalog
its some old fashion coded page that has a bunch of apple drivers you can download by pasting one of the codes in your browser,
i searched for bootcamp support drivers, and found the code for my exact model (Mac Pro 8,2)
i was able to manually downloaded the drivers instead of using bootcamp assistant.
As a side note,
i was able to download the bootcamp drivers via boot camp assistant after the 5th try,
so now i have both files that i know are supposed to work 100%. they are loaded and unzipped on an SD card like they are supposed to be for when i open windows.
I have a Genuine Windows 7 Home Premium x64 bit CD from the inlaws so i used that CD after i partitioned my drive in bootcamp.
Bootcamp run like it was supposed to, and i followed step by step instructions in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uVfRQ0YIDUI&feature=related
once windows was finished installing,
it automatically would not detect a network card, so i couldn't connect to the internet and download the apples bug fix. (The Hot fix)
instead i downloaded the hot fix on a separate SD card, turned windows back on and loaded the hot fix from the SD card.
Windows installed the hot fix update, restarted, but nothing changed.
Ive even tried skipping right to uploading the drivers, and windows wont activate the support because it says its not "32 Valid"
I completely removed windows 7 vis bootcamp to rinse and repeat hoping i made a simple mistake, but no same thing happened.
Conclusion
-im Wondering if i should "Istall important Windows Updates" during the begining of windows preperation...
maybe that will fix the issues of it not reconizing wierless network, and not being able to upen up the bootcamp file?
(it says you are not supposed to install any windows updates untill the HOT FIX and BOOTCAMP SUPPORT is activated on windows)

Keith Doherty3 wrote:
You have been too cleaver for a Boot Camp install.
The partition system does NOT like anything other than a standard arrangement which creates 4 partitions.
EFI -200mb
OSx - Extended Journaled
Buffer-200mb
Windows -NTFS
Return to OSx -Open Boot Camp tool from the utilities folder reset to a single partition.
Start again and when you get to Windows - Let all the drivers load on the CREATED partition. Use the External for storage !
Just for your information, as it doesn't seem you have ever used BC.
When starting the boot camp assistant the first thing it want to do is download the Windows Support drivers and asks you to save them to a DVD, it will also allow you to save them to your OS X hard drive or to any drive connected to the system. Once those drivers are downloaded it then starts the Win install. What you must do is copy those support drives to a media that Windows can See and Read from. Like a DVD or a thumb drive formatted FAT32
No where in the OPs post does he say anything about fooling with any partitions on his internal drive other then creating the BC partition.
His problem is he saved those support files to a Mac OS X formatted external drive. Windows can not read Mac Extended (Journaled) formatted drives. So he can't load the drivers for Windows until he copies those support files ove to something that Windows can read.

Hot Fix error message for KB979344 "this update is not applicable to your computer", on Windows 7 64 bit with SP1

I've been having issues with an external Esata drive. Instead of being seen as a removeable drive, it is seen as a hard drive. This has caused us nothing but problems since our full disk encryption software automatically starts to encrypt
the drive rendering it useless.
The real problem I'm having is installing the Hot Fix, KB979344, for this issue. when tring to install, I get the message, "this update is not applicable to your computer" I've looked and this hot fix doesn't seem to be part of SP1, but
I could be missing it. Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Keith

Hi Keithk,
This hotfix is already contained in Windows 7 Service Pack 1.
Please add the registry key to check if the issue persists. (For added protection, back up the registry before you modify it. Then, you can restore the registry if a problem occurs. )
Navigate to: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Storage
Create a DWORD Value, name SATAHotplugPolicyOverride,
set 1 in Value Data.
Restart the computer to check if it works.
Regards,
Miya
TechNet Subscriber Support in forum. If you have any feedback on our support, please contact
[email protected]
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. | Please remember to click "Mark as Answer" on the post that helps you, and to click "Unmark as Answer" if a marked post does not actually answer
your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

XP to Win7 Upgrade Task Sequence failing with the error 0x800700C1 (Already applied the Hot Fix KB 2910552)

Hi all
I'm having the same error that is described in this article http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2910552/en-us
So i have applied this hot-fix to the SCCM 2012 server and update the distribution points of all boot images. and also i have deployed the hot-fix client package to my XP machines. client's Task Sequence component is now updated to 5.00.7958.1104.
Still i'm getting the same error in SMSTS.log
Please help me on this.
Asitha

Which boot image are you using? It has to match the architecture (x86 / x64) of XP if I am not mistaken.
Torsten Meringer | http://www.mssccmfaq.de

I made a dual boot of windows 7 and mac os x lion in my macbook pro .i installed m icrosoft support software also. now, can i install windows updates? do i turn on the automatic updating of updates? does hot fix of microsoft helps in stop freezing?

i made a dual boot of windows 7 and mac os x lion in my macbook pro .i installed m icrosoft support software also. now, can i install windows updates? do i turn on the automatic updating of updates? does hot fix of microsoft i.e, " support.microsoft.com/kb/979491" helps in stop freezing in dual boot mechanism?

Windows has a software updater built into Windows and when you install the Boot Camp drivers then it will install an Apple software updater also. I believe Windows is set to automatically download and install your updates as does the Apple software Updater. They both will update the individual files it needs to periodically.
"Microsoft updates" and "Windows updates" are basically the same thing in Windows. Are you talking about the "Windows support software" when downloading from Boot Camp Assistant? Apple installs a software updater for it's Boot Camp drivers in Windows 7 so you can do it manually or automatically.
The "Hot Fix" your referring to is only for certain motherboards built from other Windows only computer manufacturers and does NOT pertain to any Apple computers.
If you have a problem with your computer then it's best to ask a specific question so we can help better.

Cumulative Hot Fix 2 for ColdFusion 8.0.1?

We've been feeling a little leery about Adobe's stance with
CF8 for a while now due to the lack of patches and updates compared
to what we've been used to expecting from Macromedia. We've been
checking the patch and security pages a couple times a week looking
to see if there have been any changes. I noticed a change date on
the CF8 patch page the other day but no new patches showed up.
http://www.adobe.com/support/coldfusion/downloads_updates.html
Then today I noticed the date changed again at the bottom and
now there was a new patch at the top replacing the 2 that were
there before. Cumulative Hot Fix 2 for ColdFusion 8.0.1
The patch says it's from 10/20/2008 and if you decompress the
file it gives a date of 10/17/2008 on the file. This patch was new
to the public as of this week though. The reason I'm posting is to
try to understand why this patch has been sitting unreleased for
nearly 5 months now? There clearly have not been any changes to the
file in that time frame so that was either the best written patch
with the most exhaustive testing ever or someones been neglecting
posting the patches that have been completed.

@brentil, ah, ok. I understand now. Yep, that is curious. I
can confirm that it wasn't there on Mar 17, per the Google cache
page:
http://74.125.93.104/search?rlz=1C1GGLS_en-USUS291US306&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=cache:h ttp://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/viewContent.do%3FexternalId%3Dkb402604%26sliceId%3D1
Of course, by the time someone reads this in the future, it's
possible that the cached page will be different again. One would
want to note the date offered by Google at the top of the page it
shows.
So the real question is why the CHF link was note posted here
until now. I'm with you that some resources are not always updated.
I blogged about it:
http://www.carehart.org/blog/client/index.cfm/2008/7/16/beware_technotes_may_not_be_listed _elsewhere
Perhaps more dismaying is that the CHF2 technote lists many
more HFs included than appear in the main hotfix page (the URL you
pointed to). So one might ask why we should have had to wait for a
CHF to get those hotfixes.
Also, I notice that the main cf8 downloads page (which you
pointed to originally) does not, in fact, refer to the 8.0.1 CHF
(though it does list 8.0 CHFs). That should be address.
I agree that we should expect the hotfixes page to list any
hotfixes or CHFs as soon as they're available. Sorry I missed your
main point.
Sadly, I don't know that we can expect too much to come of
this discussion here. There's just no guarantee that anyone
responsible would see it. But here's good news. A couple of blog
entries have raised the concern:
http://www.creative-restraint.co.uk/blog/post.cfm/coldfusion-8-0-1-cumulative-hotfix-2
http://blog.pengoworks.com/index.cfm/2009/3/18/ColdFusion-v801-Hot-Fix-2-released-in-Oct-2 008
And Ben Forta is a party to the second one, where I've just
added a comment asking to find who we can press about this.
Finally, just an FYI: that URL you offered is indeed the same
page that I'd offered. The URL I gave (
http://www.adobe.com/go/kb402604)
comes from the "permanent link" offered at the bottom of all Adobe
technotes, which is just a nice shorter URL.

Cisco ISE: 802.1x [EAP-TLS] + List of Applicable Hot-Fixes

Dear Folks,
Kindly suggest the list of all possible Hot-Fixes required for the Cisco ISE EAP-TLS solution... We have applied 9 HotFixes so far. But, still the connectivity is intermittent. Is there any list for all applicable Hot-Fixes?
OS = Win 7 SP1 (32/64 Bit) and Win 8
Thanks,
Regards,
Mubasher Sultan

Hi Mubasher
KB2481614:      If you’re configuring your 802.1x settings via Group Policy you’ll see      sometimes EAP-PEAP request from clients in your radius server log during      booting even if you’ll set EAP-TLS. This error happened in our case with      1/3 of the boots with some models. The error is caused by a timing problem      during startup. Sometimes the 802.1x is faster and sometimes the Group      Policy is, and if the 802.1x is faster than the default configuration is      taken, which is PEAP. Which lead to a EAP-NAK by the radius server.
KB980295:      If an initial 802.1x authentication is passed, but a re-authentication      fails, Windows 7 will ignore all later 802.1x requests. This hotfix should      also fix a problem with computers waking up from sleep or hibernation –      but we’ve disabled these features so I can’t comment on them.
KB976373:      This hotfix is called “A computer that is connected to an IEEE      802.1x-authenticated network via another 802.1x enabled device does not      connect to the correct network”. I can’t comment on this, as we’ve not      deployed 802.1x for our VoIP phones at this point.I would guess it is the      same for Windows 7 too. The linked article tells you to install the patch      and set some registry key to lower the value.
KB2769121:      A short time ago I found this one: “802.1X authentication fails on a      Windows 7-based or Windows 2008 R2-based computer that has multiple      certificates”. At time of writing I’m not sure if it helps for something      in my setup. According to the symptoms list of the hotfix, it does not,      but maybe it helps for something else, as the one before does.
KB2736878:      An other error during booting – this time it happens if the read process      starts before the network adapter is initialized. Really seems that they      wanted to get faster boot times, no matter the costs.
KB2494172:      This hotfix fixes a problem if you’ve installed a valid and invalid      certificate for 802.1x authentication. The workaround is just deleting the      invalid certificate. I’m not sure at this point if it affects also wired      authentication.
KB976210:This      problem occurs only during automated build processes and if you use an EAP      method which needs user interaction – as I don’t do that I can’t comment      on this hotfix.
For more information please go through this link:
http://robert.penz.name/555/list-of-ieee-802-1x-hotfixes-for-windows-7/
Best Regards:
Muhammad Munir

Where can I download the hot fix for ADAPT01074306?

Hi:
The web application which uses Crystal Report XI is deployed on Webspher Application Server 5.0. Currently when a PDF file is generated, the images are mixed up with other images in the report. This is a bug of Crystal Report XI.
Could anybody please tell me where can I download the hot fix AND also this hot fix can work with Java version 1.3?
Your help is very very appreciated!!
Ying

Hi Ying,
Yes is was fixed and shipped in CR4E 2.0 and It appears it was fixed in CR4E 1.7. Updating CR4E should fix the issue.
Thank you
Don

Are there any hot fixes or releases due soon?

It's been a while since I've seen anything released from the update centre. Are there any fixes due for release soon?
Despite several months, a few hot fixes and the JSC2 Update 1 release, JSC2 doesn't seem to have improved all that much since the initial release.
The main issue for me at the minute is performance. I know this has been discussed several times on this forum, but there is very little information on when we might see a release that starts to address this issue. I realise that the issue is complex and probably covers many functional areas of the app, so a hot fix or two will not address the problem. However, at the minute working with JSC2 on a medium sized application is unproductive and is becoming almost unusable. For example, even minor code tweaks or property changes completely lock the IDE for around 30 seconds and send my CPU usage to 100%. The thing is that, functionally JSC2 is excellent. This is the way I want to be building my JSF applications and I'm very grateful to Sun for making it available for free. If it wasn't hampered with these performance issues I'd be knocking out web apps in no time at all but unfortunately, as it stands now, it is almost a hinderance. I have some new projects coming up where I would like to use JSC2 but I cannot recommend it on the grounds of productivity.
When can we expect something to be released that starts addressing performance? When can I start recommending JSC2 again?

As per previous posts, complete agreement.
I have built a production system in-house for a large company using JSC. I had to get my machine upgraded to 2GB just to get some usuability but it still needs a few jsc re-starts and appserver restarts through out the day.
Functionality wise, JSC is such a winner and the guys at SUN have indeed did a great job. I come from a VB environement for the last 12 years, so having a rich web client tool was high on my priority. But if I am to try and preach to the rest of the J2EE guys here, the performance issues really need to be addressed. They are used to Eclipse and I don't need to go on about how good that tool is. If any other company gets JSF to work under Eclipse the way JSC does, I would have no hesitation in using that tool.
I hvae tried some of the Eclipse based JSF IDE's and they don't even compete with JSC in terms of ease of use and putting apps together. But they do not lock the machine for 30 secs when I click a property or right click on a component !
I have been one of the champions of JSC from the start and I still am. The system I wrote has near 300 users and is working fine with not one
problem in 3 months. If this performance problem can be beat, JSC will set the standard for GUI development for years. If not, then it will be consigned to the nearly made it bin.
To the guys at SUN:
After all the time and effort you have put into this product, I'm sure there is no overnight cure for the problems. I am sure you are working on the problems. For me, I don't care about any new Ajax components, etc in the updates. If the next patch gets JSC even working 50% better performance, I will be a happy man. Then I can go and try to convert the unimpressed.
if not, then I will be forced into a corner to use IDM RAD tool for JSF development, of which I do not want to do. My company has an IBM affiliation, but I like to use the best tools for the job.
Overall, impressed by JSC but the final hurdle has not been jumped.
Regards,
LOTI.

Need help in installing hot fix and updated

Hi,,
we r having exchange svr which is running on w2k8 R2 sp1, now we have to update the service pack and security patches..
we have some hot fix relating to clustering also to be fixed in this server...
so anyone pls guide me which one is to be installed first and so on...
tell me what are the impact that we will face during this activity...
whether we can carry all this activity at a same time.. if so in wat order...
thanks in advance...

You need to supply more information about your Exchange environment.
What Exchange version are you using today?
How many Exchange do you have and which server holds which role?
Are you using CAS with NLB?
Are you using DAG?
Any way, the order of servers updates are:
Client Access Server (if you have multiple sites internet facing sites first)
Hub Transport
Mailbox
Unified Messaging
You can start with this:
Preparations:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff637981(v=exchg.141).aspx
and
http://www.msexchange.org/articles-tutorials/exchange-server-2010/management-administration/applying-service-pack-and-rollup-updates-exchange-server-2010-part1.html
CAS servers:
http://exchangeserverpro.com/how-to-install-updates-on-exchange-server-2010-cas-arrays/
DAG servers:
http://exchangeserverpro.com/how-to-install-updates-on-exchange-server-2010-database-availability-groups/
Please take a moment to Vote as Helpful and/or Mark as Answer where applicable. Thanks.

CFMX 7.0.2 Cumulative Hot Fix 3 Question...

I feel like an idiot for asking this, but I'm hoping someone can clarify the install instructions for CFMX 7.0.2 Cumulative Hot Fix 3 for me.
I totally get uploading the chf7020003.jar file through the CF Admin (which really just copies the JAR to the cfusion/lib/updates folder), but what's throwing me off is in the bottom of the document where it talks about hot fix #65719 (CFDocument hot-fix). This hot fix requires manually swapping out some JARS in the cfusion/lib folder. I'm all good with that too.
My ultimate question here is DOES CFMX 7.0.2 Cumulative Hot Fix 3 ****require**** hot fix #65719 (CFDocument hot-fix)? Or can I just install the chf7020003.jar and not worry about the CFDocument hot-fix? I'd like to NOT install the CFDocument hot-fix unless it's required.
Also, I know the instructions for installing the Cumulative updates say to remove other installed hot-fixes, but I didn't see hot-fix #65719 in the list of hotfixes that Cumulative Hot Fix 3 includes, so I'm guessing I'd need both?
This has got to seem like a silly question, but it just doesn't seem clear to me, any help to clarify this is greatly appreciated.
- Kurt
CFMX 7.0.2 Cumulative Hot Fix 3 install instructions
http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/402/kb402465.html
Hot Fix #65719 (CFDocument hot-fix) install instructions
http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/402/kb402093.html

My reading of the cumulative hotfix 3 page is that the #65719 hotfix
is not included in the cumulative hotfix 3 and needs to be installed
separately. (Especially from "The following update requires that the
files be installed directly to the operating system and not through
the standard hot fix procedure" I read that #65719 cannot be installed
via a normal hotfix, which cumulative hotfix 3 seems to be).
Mack

Hot fix 4 is 64 bit. What to do if need to sequence for W732 bit embedded ?

Hello,
hot fix 4 for APP-V 5 SP2 is 64 bit
what to do if I want to sequence for W7 Embedded 32 bit (Hp Thin Client)
On sequencer (w7 32bit) and client W7 32 bit SP2 I cannot install hotfix 4.
Probably, it will affect the functionalities fixed by Hotfix 4?
I guess I have to try and see if it considerable in my environment?
Thanks.
"When you hit a wrong note it's the next note that makes it good or bad". Miles Davis

Those are 32-bit executables that will install the right hotfix or Sequencer on x86 or x64 Windows.
Please remember to click "Mark as Answer" or "Vote as Helpful" on the post that answers your question (or click "Unmark as Answer" if a marked post does not actually
answer your question). This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.
This forum post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of my employer, Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.
Twitter:
@stealthpuppy | Blog:
stealthpuppy.com |
The Definitive Guide to Delivering Microsoft Office with App-V

Uninstalling the Arial Narrow hot fix ?

I have a bit of a dilemma. As many others here have experienced, when I went to Vista Home Premium on a new system and running Office 2007, the only Arial Narrow font showing up in InDesign CS2 was regular. I did some online research and read something about older versions of Arial Narrow fonts would fix the problem. I have a CD of fonts I copied from my previous system that has an older version of the Arial Narrow family than currently on my new system, so as a test I decided to install just one and see if it works. So I chose Arial Narrow Bold and installed the older version (v2.30) over the newer version (v2.37). Normally, I back up any files/fonts I'll be overwriting but didn't do it this time (old age setting in). Well, it didn't work and after reopening InDesign, Arial Narrow Bold was still not in the list.
I then read about the hot fix, so downloaded it and installed it as well as deleting all the AdobeFnt10.lst files on my system. I reopened InDesign and low and behold, all Arial Narrow fonts were in the list...except bold, the one I'd replaced. Thinking reinstalling the original version would get it back, I had a friend send me the 2.37 version of Arial Narrow Bold and installed it over the older version. Nothing. Still no bold showing up in the list even after again deleting all the AdobeFnt10.lst files.
This leads me to believe the hot fix only works when the original fonts are in the system at the time it's installed. Once the hot fix is installed, reinstalling the font after the fact doesn't work. Is that how it works? If so, I'm wondering if I were able to uninstall or somehow remove the hot fix, then reinstall it, I may get the bold back along with the others.
BTW, in checking the current versions of Arial Narrow that were loaded with my new system, they're all v2.40 except the bold which is v2.37. I had two of my friends who are running the same OS and Office check their Arial Narrow versions and their bold version is 2.37 as well.
If anyone knows how to remove the hot fix, please let me know.
DC

Take a look in Regedit at HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Fonts and see if you see all those numbered versions. That's the location in XP and it might be different for Vista, but you should be able to find it doing a registry search for Arial Narrow. I'd do this after deleting the font from the fonts folder.
Just to be safe, set a restore point, and back up the registry, because While I think it will be safe to edit this key, I haven't tried it and blind registry editing is always a risk.
If there are multiple entries, try deleting them all. If only one, double-click to see the value data and try editing to remove the number, or delete the entry entirely (probably better if the font has been removed).
Peter

Where to download the "Windows 2000 Wireless 802.1X hot fix"?

From the "Cisco Aironet Wireless LAN Client Adapters Configuration Guide for Windows", it indicates that Windows 2000 can support host-based EAP with the "Service Pack 3 or greater and the Windows 2000 Wireless 802.1X hot fix".
However, I cannot find the 802.1x hot fix in Microsoft. Please kindly advise how I can download this hot fix. And, what is the function of this 802.1 hot fix?
Thanks!!!!

Hi!
Here you have the link to the hotfix :
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/release.asp?ReleaseID=45017&area=search&ordinal=1
Regards
Fredric

JSPM: Error during validation of the dependencies of the selected hot fixes

Hi,
We have a strange problem, recently we have upgraded our server from XI 3.0 to PI 7.1 and after the upgrade
as part of post upgrade steps I had to deploy few SDA/SCA files, while I am trying to deploy these files
I am getting the error "Error during validation of the dependencies of the selected hot fixes" during the check queue phase and I am not able to go ahead..
As I am facing the same error for three different kinds of SDA files, I was trying to apply SP03 for my
JSPM version 7.11.0.0.119 but even here I am facing the same error.
I am sure that what ever the files I am trying to deploy are correct because these are instructed by SAP.
I guess I have some problem with my JSPM.
Please help me.
Thanking you in advance.
Sonali

Just updated your other post -
Java deployment tools on NW 7.1
Error during validation of the dependencies of the selected hot fixes
Btw, could you check the documents of these SDA files in case there is soem common dependency?

Is Informatica 9.0.1 with hot fix 2 is supported with AIX 7.1

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for