Is it normal for a BADI Implementation to be deactivated after an Upgrade?.

We've upgraded CRM 7, bringing it right up to the latest version. However, I noticed some functionality that stopped working and after investigation noted that a BADI Implementation was Inactive, although was Active and working before the upgrade.
Would you expect this to happen. I can see why it might if the BADI code had changed, but otherwise I always considered implementations as Z code, which they are, so should not be touched by anything that SAP do.
Jason

Jason,
Only thing I can think of is that the generation of the object failed and thus it was put in an inactive state after an upgrade. Normally I would agree that the BADI's should be active even after an upgrade(I have never had to reactivate them as far as I can remember).
Take care,
Stephen

Similar Messages

Okay so I just got a new MacBook and I'm setting it up. I decided to not download all of my files to iCloud drive and its taking forever to load to the next page. Is this normal for it to take so long? After all I didn't even download my stuff?

why is it taking forever to load!?

The files you are loading into the new computer are by wi-fi? If you have no other option
that may be OK but slow. A faster method would be Ethernet cable from internet router
or modem, instead of wireless. Most of the setup process can take some time.
What are these files? Where are they now?
Do you have a backup on-site, & not online?
Did you check to see if the operating system was updated as part of the setup before use?
The Software Update can locate later parts to the as-shipped system, that may be needed.
Other upgrades or new apps are through the Mac App Store, some through App Store, etc.
As part of the setup, you could use a migration assistant if you have a backup from the old
computer or have other files saved in an external hard drive to import.
Hopefully your process won't be drawn out too long...
Good luck & happy computing!

Fix for HP 7410 All-In-One Freezing after SN Upgrade!

I upgraded to SN and immediately my trusty 2 year old HP 7410 All-In-One went into an endless initialization loop. All it would do was display the HP logo and a continuous progress bar at the bottom of the little screen on the front of it. After no effective solution from the HP site, and nothing that worked here, I went into online search mode and found a blog entry that walks you through getting the device back up and running. It sure saved me $500 that I didn't have to spend!
I'd caution that this worked for me but I have no idea what the root cause was except something to do with the wireless card. The blog gives excellent step by step instructions to disconnect the wireless card connection but if your machine is still under warranty you COULD void that warranty I'd assume. But since this involves a simple unplugging of a connector that can be reconnected it's sure worth a try!
As I mentioned it seems that there's an issue with the wireless card that is somehow responsible for the device locking up permanently as well as it becoming invisible over the network. It becomes unusable over a wireless network as well as via direct USB connection. This shakes it all loose and gives immediate access via USB. There is apparently a few ways to reestablish wireless connectivity but I need to research that a bit more. If/when I find that I'll add another post to this thread.
http://larrycrazyness.blogspot.com/2009/01/hp-fixed.html
After the initial blog entry there are over 150 responses from people that it has worked for including me. I'm not associated with that blog but I thought the information could save many the expense of a service call (that apparently doesn't result in a fix) and the cost of a replacement. Enjoy!

UPDATE: As it stands, I opened the scanner bed and cleaned the glass Home Position strip (for the 6th time now) and low-and-behold, the printer functions properly again.
I know this issue will happen again in a few weeks to a month or so...
My question still stands...
Can ANYONE come up with a permanent solution to repair this issue?
Thanks again in advance.

More than one filter in a BAdi implementation

Hi Experts,
   Is it possible to have more than one filter value for one BAdi implementation?
   Or should I create separate implementation for every filter value?
   I tried creating second filter in an existing BAdi implementation and it is not allowing.
Thanks and regards,
Venkat.

Hi,
I agree with Sandeep.
You can create n number of filter values according to the bussiness need.
Thanks
Arbind

BADI implementation is not working in background for MRRL

Hai frnds,
BADI: MRM_WT_SPLIT_UPDATE is used for deducting withholding tax in MRRL(Invoice verification). This BADI was implemented and working fine in foreground, but not working in background.
After implementing the BADI, the standard method of calculating TDS(from vendor master) is over written by BADI implementation.Now standard deduction is also not workijng in background.Plz help me to solve it.
Bala.V

HI,
COR6N is the Enjoy Transaction and sap does not suggest to write the BDC on these transaction as most of these transaction uses the GUI elements foe better display and which cannot be recorded while processing the BDC in back ground.
Check for the Normal transaction and write the BDC for it.
Or
Pass X to Rcommit flag in the CTU_PARAMS option and check.

How to know if implementation with a filter value exist for a BAdI in code?

Hi all,
Scenario:
I created a BAdI. There will be a button on the UI to call its implementation(s); while if there is no implementation with specified filter value, this button needs to be hidden. Thus I need to know if the implementation exist before calling it.
Question:
In the ABAP code, how to get whether implementation with specified filter value exists for a BAdI?
If it's possible, please help provide code.
Thanks and regards,
Said

Problem solved:
data: r_badi type ref to YOUR_BADI,
          badi_impl_num type i.
get badi r_badi
    filters
      flt_name = fit_val.
badi_impl_num = cl_badi_query=>number_of_implementations( badi = r_badi ).
if badi_impl_num > 0.
    "there are badi implementation(s)
endif.

BADI implementation for NOTIF_EVENT_POST not getting triggered

Hi All,
We have created an implementaion for the NOTIF_EVENT_POST. And it was working fine previously. Now it is not working for some reason. In fact issue is that the implemetation is not getting triggerd at all. I have put a BREAK-POINT statement in the code, but does not even goes into the code.
I have checked all the properties. It is active. The table V_EXT_IMP has a entry corresponding to the BADI definition and implementation.
I tried to debug the standard transaction IW52 (which uses this). The program runs till the FM call for CL_EXITHANDLER=>GET_INSTANCE. It created a instance also. But it does not get inside the call for the method of the BADI LR_BADI_INST->CHECK_DATA_AT_POST.
I am at a fix now. Can somebody answer this issue? It would be very helpful.
Regards
Barada.
Edited by: Baradakanta Swain on Aug 5, 2008 4:06 PM

I did not get the issue with the BADI implementation. But as our time line was very tight, we moved the code to BTE event for Updating Notifications.
This required a little tweaking of the code and now it is working.
I am marking it ANSWERED so as to remove it from the list of unanswered questions.
Regards
Barada

Unable to create the implementation for BBP_PD_DOWNLOAD badi

Hi ,
Iam trying to create a new implementation for this BADI BBP_PD_DOWNLOAD as zbbp_pd_download but when iam trying to activate it .iam getting a message that already active implementation is there and i cannot create a new implementation unless i deactivate the other one.since it is a standard one i cannot deactivate it .
Has any one used this earlier . any inputs on this wil be of great help .
Thanks in advance

Hi
You can create any number of Customer Implementations, provided only one is active at a time.
Here are the steps ->
Either Using SE18 / SE19 Transaction, or
After you call the IMG activity, the system displays a dialog box where you enter a name for the implementation.
If implementations of this Business Add-In have already been created, the system displays them in a dialog box. You then choose one of them by choosing Create, and continue as follows:
1. In the dialog box, enter a name for the implementation of the Add-In and choose Create. (Say ZBADI)
The system displays the initial screen for creating Business Add-In implementations.
2. On this screen, enter a short description for you implementation in the Implementation Short Text field.
3. If you choose the Interface tab, you will notice that the system has filled in the Name of the Implementing Class field automatically, by assigning a class name based on the name of your implementation.
4. Save your entries and assign the Add-In to a package.
5. To edit a method, double-click its name.
6. Enter your implementation code between the method <Interface Name>~<Name of Method>. and endmethod. statements.
7. Save and activate your code. Navigate back to the Change Implementation screen.
Note: You can also create an implementation for an Add-In and not activate it until later. If you want to do this, do not carry out the following step:
8. Choose Activate.
When the application program is executed, the system carries out the code in the method you wrote.
Regards
- Atul

!!URGENT!! BADI Implementation for creation of G/L accounts

Please can you urgently help. I am trying to implement a user exit or badi to check the uniqueness of the description while creating a G/L account.
I tried to create a BADI implementation to the definition FI_LIMIT_ACCOUNT but it gives error messages that this is for SAP internal use.
The user exit ZXF03U01 used in enhancement SAPMF02H cannot be used as this exit passes only SKA1 and SKB1.I would like to check on SKAT. The fields affected in SKAT-TXT20 and SKAT-TXT50.
Do you see a solution to this?
I have the same to be implemented for KS01/KS02 - Create/Change Costcenter.
A prompt response would be appreciated.

Also try :
CL_IM_QISR1_GL_ACCOUNT_CRE Class
Or FM`s
GL_ACCOUNT_INSERT
GL_ACCOUNT_IN_COA_INSERT
GL_ACCOUNT_IN_COMPANY_INSERT
GL_ACCOUNT_SAMPLE_INSERT
GL_ACCT_CH_REQ_CREATE_ACCOUNT
Thanks

How may implementations can we have for a BaDI?

How may implementations can we have for a BaDI?

if BADI check Multi-USE , then u can
Multiple-Use Business Add-Ins
You can differentiate between single-use and multiple use Business Add-Ins. The distinction is based on the procedure or event character of an enhancement. In the first case, the program waits for the enhancement to return something, usually a return code. A typical example could be a benefit calculation in HR. Depending on the implementation, alternative calculations can be executed. With multiple use add-ins, an event that may be of interest to other components is processed in program flow. Any number of components could use this event as a hook to hang their own additional actions on to.
In addition to importing parameters, you can also use changing parameters for multiple-use Business Add-Ins. There is no sequence control for multiple-use implementations of BadIs. Therefore, using changing parameters can cause problems. There is no guarantee that implementations will not overwrite the results of previous implementations. Sequence control is technically impossible, since at the time of the definition the interface does not know which implementations there will be and which parameters will be changed by implementations. It is not possible to have a decision as to which implementation should be executed before which other (future) implementation.
Example:
In a particular application, you want to be able to continue processing indexes after another component has saved data (in other words, the system should allow you to use an add-in after saving). Since this point in time can be useful for different purposes, you can create an enhancement here that can be used by multiple subscribers.
To create a multiple-use Business Add-In, proceed as follows:
       1.      Define an add-in and select the Multiple Use checkbox from the Administration tab.
       2.      Define an interface with the method OBJECT_SAVED'and the importing parameter OBJECTNAME.
Calling your enhancement in the application program:
program event.
data exit_obj type ref to if_ex_event.
call method cl_exithandler =>get_instance
     changing instance = exit.
form save_object using obj_name type c.
update
call method exit_obj->object_saved
     exporting objectname = obj_name.
endform.
For the caller it is irrelevant whether (and how many) subscribers use the event as a starting point for further actions. The active implementations are called in the adapter method.
more in http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/ee/a1d548892b11d295d60000e82de14a/content.htm
Regards
Prabhu

Sending Email using cl_bcs from a badi implementation

Hi,
I have written my code to send Email, inside AFTER_SAVE method of BADI Implementation of DOCUMENT_MAIN01.
Now this method of cl_bcs requires COMMIT WORK for the mail to be sent. And inside BADI implementation, we cannot write a COMMIT statement.
What is a workaround for this? While going through few other posts, I came across remote enabled FMs.
Is that the only way? Can I use some additions like STARTING NEW TASK etc. Following is the call used in case of cl_bcs:
   CALL METHOD G_REF_SEND_REQUEST->SEND(
          EXPORTING
            I_WITH_ERROR_SCREEN = 'X'
         RECEIVING
            RESULT              = G_SENT_TO_ALL ).
I also tried using SO_NEW_DOCUMENT_SEND_API1 STARTING NEW TASK and it works fine. But the subject length is a constraint their.
Please suggest.
Thanks in advance.

Hi friend.
*& Report ZTEST_273068_EMAIL_CL_BCS
REPORT ZTEST_273068_EMAIL_CL_BCS.
CONSTANTS:
    gc_subject TYPE so_obj_des VALUE 'ABAP Email with CL_BCS',
    gc_raw     TYPE char03 VALUE 'RAW'.
DATA:
    gv_mlrec         TYPE so_obj_nam,
    gv_sent_to_all   TYPE os_boolean,
    gv_email         TYPE adr6-smtp_addr,
    gv_subject       TYPE so_obj_des,
    gv_text          TYPE bcsy_text,
    gr_send_request TYPE REF TO cl_bcs,
    gr_bcs_exception TYPE REF TO cx_bcs,
    gr_recipient     TYPE REF TO if_recipient_bcs,
    gr_sender        TYPE REF TO cl_sapuser_bcs,
    gr_document      TYPE REF TO cl_document_bcs.
TRY.
      "Create send request
      gr_send_request = cl_bcs=>create_persistent( ).
      "Email FROM...
      gr_sender = cl_sapuser_bcs=>create( sy-uname ).
      "Add sender to send request
      CALL METHOD gr_send_request->set_sender
        EXPORTING
          i_sender = gr_sender.
      "Email TO...
      gv_email = '[email protected]'.
      gr_recipient = cl_cam_address_bcs=>create_internet_address( gv_email ).
      "Add recipient to send request
      CALL METHOD gr_send_request->add_recipient
        EXPORTING
          i_recipient = gr_recipient
          i_express   = 'X'.
      "Email BODY
      APPEND 'Hello world! My first ABAP email!' TO gv_text.
      gr_document = cl_document_bcs=>create_document(
                      i_type    = gc_raw
                      i_text    = gv_text
                      i_length = '12'
                      i_subject = gc_subject ).
      "Add document to send request
      CALL METHOD gr_send_request->set_document( gr_document ).
      "Send email
      CALL METHOD gr_send_request->send(
        EXPORTING
          i_with_error_screen = 'X'
        RECEIVING
          result              = gv_sent_to_all ).
      IF gv_sent_to_all = 'X'.
        WRITE 'Email sent!'.
      ENDIF.
      "Commit to send email
      COMMIT WORK.
      "Exception handling
    CATCH cx_bcs INTO gr_bcs_exception.
      WRITE:
        'Error!',
        'Error type:',
        gr_bcs_exception->error_type.
ENDTRY.
Just Execute it.
Regards,
Thrimu

HT4060 Is it normal for someone to have general diffuculty charging an ipad? I see the "not charging" message even when I am using the charger and cord that came in the original box, plugged into a wall socket directly. It just seems to be exceedingly f

Is it normal for someone to have general diffuculty charging an ipad? I see the "not charging" message even when I am using the charger and cord that came in the original box, plugged into a wall socket directly. It is normal for me to plug it in overnight and to see no charge whatsoever the next day. I have never had so much trouble using a friggin charger in my life. It just seems to be exceedingly finicky. What am I missing?

Charging your iPad should not be problematic. It should be an easy thing to do using the charger provided with your iPad connected to a known good wall outlet.
The charging problem you are experiencing is most like caused by:
1. A faulty charger
2. A faulty cable
3. A bad wall outlet
4. A problem in the iPad.
The first three of these are easiest to eliminate. Try a for ends charger and cable. Make absolutely sure your outlet is good. Try other outlets.
If the charger, cable and outlet a proven to be good then the problem lies in the iPad.
Make an appointment at an Apple Store to have your device examined by a technician. Or contact Apple Support.

Classic badi implementation zac_document not being called

For classic BADI AC_DOCUMENT I had prior and currently have an implementation ZAC_DOCUMENT.
I had this working but now it is not working and I am unable to determine why not. I deleted the implementation and recreated it with SE18.
If I view the implementation in change mode of transaction SE19, I see on the attributes tab that the implementation is activated. On the interface tab it says....
interface name IF_EX_AC_DOCUMENT
name of implementing class ZCL_IM_AC_DOCUMENT
I double click on method CHANGE_AFTER_CHECK to see my code which passes syntax check... I'll abbreviate....
method IF_EX_AC_DOCUMENT~CHANGE_AFTER_CHECK.
data:
loop at IM_DOCUMENT-ITEM into wa_accit.
lc_nomod = 'X'.
substituted alternative account
if ....
if lc_nomod is initial.
append wa_accit_sub to ex_document-item .
endif.
endloop.
endmethod.
The code here is not being triggered, nor is a set break-point. Thanks in advance for any help getting this to work again.

check if you are using the valid data to hit the BADI

BAPI Check in BADI Implementation

Dear All,
We have made an enhancement through BADI in ME21N / ME22N transaction like validating certain entries, in that I am checking the t-codes ME21, ME21N, ME22 and ME22N. If it fails then PO wonu2019t create and populate some messages.
Now there is one custom program which creating POu2019s through calling BAPI in the program and itu2019s not validating the above as its calling through custom program.
(i.e SY-TCODE eq SE38)
Now how I should put a condition on BAPI in my BADI implementation?? If it is normal user exit, we can use runtime structure T158 and check the TCODE in that. But as I am using the BADI ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST with the method CHECK doesnu2019t have any transaction code info.
And currently I have an idea of using the GET / SET Parameters and need to set in the custom program and get that info in BADI? But I donu2019t know whether this idea good or not?? If anyone has any idea please let me know?
Thanks,
Raghu.

Hi Raghu,
If sy-tcode ne 'ME21'
and sy-tcode ne 'ME21N'...
IMPORT lv_data ....
do processing...
endif.
Best regards,
Prashant

Query in Badi Implementation!!!!

Hi all,
I have a requirement which requires me to Implement the Badi 'DOC_PERSONALIZE_BCS' .
This is a filter dependent Badi.
When I try to Implement this Badi , I am required to give a filter value.
When I give the filter value and try to activate the Badi , I get a message as follows:
"There are already Active Implementations for these Filter types"
I checked and found out that there is already a Standard Implementation for this Badi.
I want my Badi to get activated.
Please tell me how I can activate my Badi for the Filter type.
Kindly reply immediately as this is bit urgent.
Regards,
Vijay

Hi,
You can get your BADI activated even though the filter value is already defined in other implementation. This condition should not give any problem in activitating the BADI. But this condition should be avoided. Because if two implementations are present in BADI with same filter value then whenever the BADI is called, all implementations with the given filter value are executed which is not desirable.
You need to deactivate the std implementation and then create new implementation or copy the std implementation and make changes in it as per your requirement.
Please reward if useful.
Regards,
Ashlesha

Is it normal for a BADI Implementation to be deactivated after an Upgrade?.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for