Is it possible to config IPSLA DHCP broadcast to check DHCP relay + network performance for DHCP operation

We need to check our network performance for DHCP operation,to cover SLA through CPE(DHCP client)-send DHCPDISCOVER broadcast ,PE router relay agent-send DHCP operation packets to main and backup DHCP servers simultaneously(backup and main servers work standalone,they are communicate with each other and sends reply to DHCPDISCOVER message by DHCPOFFER),server vrrp,server (DHCP server).For this we need to create broadcast message from CPE end using cisco ipsla.Is there any possibility to check this.
Thaks & Regards  

Can we configure 12 DHCP pools for LAN users and wireless users in the Cisco WS-3750X-24S-S switch?
I believe you can configure this much DHCP pools.  
Can It Handle the DHCP Load of the LAN users and Wireless users together?
It can.  DHCP is not CPU intensive.  Plus you have lease time.   
Besides, it's a small network.  Should work.  The main thing though is this:  Why so many VLANs?
Downside is you don't have much features.  You can't trace a MAC address from weeks ago.  DHCP profiling is also not supported.

Similar Messages

  • Does the Airport Express support the DHCP BROADCAST flag

    In trying to connect a vista laptop to an existing Airport Express Network and the internet, went ot MS Help and found an article saying Vista is set with a 0 (Zero) in the Registry (whatever that is).The comment is -
    A value of 0 disables this registry entry. You can use this registry entry to prevent Windows Vista from using the DHCP BROADCAST flag. After you set this registry entry, Windows Vista never uses the DHCP BROADCAST flag.
    Can someone who doesnt type in UNIX or DOS tell me what might work and if this even applies. I am not inclined to do the following -
    Click Start, type regedit in the Start Search box, and then click regedit in the Programs list.
    If you are prompted for an administrator password or for confirmation, type the password or provide confirmation. 
    Locate and then click the following registry subkey:
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters\Interfaces \{GUID}
    In this registry path, click the (GUID) subkey that corresponds to the network adapter that is connected to the network.
    On the Edit menu, point to New, and then click DWORD (32-bit) Value.
    In the New Value #1 box, type DhcpConnEnableBcastFlagToggle, and then press ENTER.
    Right-click DhcpConnEnableBcastFlagToggle, and then click Modify.
    In the Value data box, type 1, and then click OK.
    Close Registry Editor.
    Hard wired to the Cable Modem the computer can connect to the internet without any of this. What in the Airport Express could be blocking this computer?

    Sorry, none of the Apple products support this.

  • Why can't Windows 7 be forced to use DHCP broadcast lease renewal?

    I have been going to this coffee shop for 11 years. It still has the same ADSL-based wireless internet service (an old wireless access point connected to the internet through ADSL).
    The ONLY way to communicate with the DHCP server in this wireless AP is via broadcast - lease renewal requests to the DHCP server via direct IP address are IGNORED. On top of that, the DHCP IP assignment pool is rather small, so to compensate the DHCP lease
    time is set to expire every 10 minutes. This is no problem normally, because an active DHCP client will request a lease renewal at half the lease time, or 5 minutes before the lease expires.
    Here is my problem: I had my registry setup to force DHCP broadcast and all was happy - UNTIL Microsoft decided to have an update ADD a "toggle broadcast" flag to the registry and make it impossible to override (so far, in spite of the kb928233
    page that supposedly tells you how to do so). Ever since then, I lose my DHCP lease (and therefore my internet connection) EVERY 10 MINUTES.
    BTW, the KB928233 page has manual registry editing instructions that are so poorly written that at least 2 or 3 different interpretations of those instructions exist. I tried at least 3 different interpretations of those instructions - none worked. A good
    part of the problem is no examples were given of what the resulting key tree should look like in regedit.
    I have invested at least 2 days in Google searches and various attempts to get these flags set the right way again - all to no avail. If I can't figure out how to solve this problem in 2 days of trying something is dreadfully wrong. Again, with emphasis,
    this USED TO WORK until somebody decided to put in a windows update that broke it.
    All I want to know is: for a particular wireless connection how to force broadcast DHCP lease renewal. Some update in the last several months seriously broke that, making it nearly impossible to force broadcast mode.  Oh yeah, it does a broadcast renewal
    request EVENTUALLY - AFTER THE CONNECTION WAS TERMINATED! That is useless - I just lost my remote terminal session or file transfer. I need it to do the broadcast request BEFORE the lease terminates.

    About 3 years ago (IIRC), when I first encountered this problem I used Wireshark to see what was going on. In the link you gave, the second bullet point under item 1 states that a broadcast DHCP renewal request would be given at 87.5 percent of the lease
    time. Wireshark never indicated that such a broadcast renewal went out. It did show the directed request at the 50% point.
    There is one other thing that may be relevant: at the time this problem re-appeared several months ago, a new registry flag also appeared: DhcpConnEnableBcastFlagToggle which was set to 1. I didn't put it there, so I surmise it came from a Microsoft update.
    At this same time the DhcpConnForceBroadcastFlag that I had set to 1 to fix my problem had been reset to 0, thus re-creating my problem.
    I have not looked at the traffic with Wireshark this time around, but I do know that I could use regedit to set the DhcpConnForceBroadcastFlag to 1, but 10 minutes later (at the exact second of the DHCP lease expiration) the connection was momentarily interrupted
    and when I did a regedit refresh, DhcpConnForceBroadcastFlag was now reset to 0 with a new lease expiration and *start* time.
    I suspect Windows rather than the access point for this reason: on a hunch last night, I tried stopping the DHCP client service, using regedit to set the DhcpConnForceBroadcastFlag to 1, then starting the DHCP client service. After this, at the DHCP lease
    expiration time there was no interruption of the connection, the DhcpConnForceBroadcastFlag was still 1 afterwards, and the DHCP lease time had been extended another 10 minutes with no new DHCP lease start time.
    So now my problem appears to be solved once again - and hopefully not temporarily this time.
    The laptop I am using has Windows 7 Home Premium edition with SP1 on it with all the latest updates. It does not appear to me to behave in the manner given in your TechNet note on Lease Renewals. If it would behave that way, I would not have had this problem.
    I am fully aware that the KB I list is for Vista - it was the only information I could find in what otherwise appears to be a void of information.

  • Is possible to config an subscrat rule for all the signatures enables in IPS?

    Hi.
    is possible to config an subscrat rule for all the signatures enables in IPS?
    Thnks
    Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

    Yes, In the event action filter configuration configure the signature range , victim IP address and the action to subtract.

  • Is it possible to config RAC in laptop(one PC)?

    Hi,
    I have never configed RAC before,and I want to do some test about RAC.
    Is it possible to config RAC in my PC (windows xp with one hard disk)?
    Thanks

    If you want to learn how it works, then use the link to Howard's site (Dizwell) that others have provided.
    Just a reminder though - it is not valid if you want to test what does and does not work, or check performance, or see proper admin techniques, or ...
    For that - if you are in the United States or western Canada, look at http://www.psoug.org

  • TCP connection for DHCP failover frequently are broken in Solaris 10

    Hi
    We have two dhcp servers which are installed in Solaris 10 and set to a failover pair. Currently, we can find that tcp connection for dhcp failover protocol are frequently broken. It looks like that primary dhcp server initiatively send FIN message to secondary one but in general, this tcp connection should always keep alive. On the other hand, the tcp connection can not completely be closed right now which FIN_WAIT_2 status in Primary one and CLOSE_WAIT status in secondary would last for a long time.
    Will Solaris 10 cause this fault? Is it a known bug in OS?
    OS info:
    -bash-3.00$ cat /etc/release
    Solaris 10 5/08 s10s_u5wos_10 SPARC
    Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    Use is subject to license terms.
    Assembled 24 March 2008
    -bash-3.00$
    -bash-3.00$
    -bash-3.00$ uname -a
    SunOS edns1 5.10 Generic_142900-03 sun4v sparc SUNW,Netra-T5220
    TCP connection info:
    Primary DHCP Server:
    2012 08 29 03:41:43
    PING 172.25.6.137: 56 data bytes 64 bytes from edns2 (172.25.6.137): icmp_seq=0. time=0.678 ms
    remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset disp
    ==============================================================================
    *idns1           195.26.151.151   3 u   45 1024  377     0.75   -0.071    0.05
    +idns2           195.26.151.151   3 u  162 1024  377     0.93    0.169    0.08
    clusternode1-pr 0.0.0.0 16 - - 1024 0 0.00 0.000 16000.0
    +clusternode2-pr idns1            4 u  406 1024  376     0.49   -0.154   15.12
    172.25.6.133.647 172.25.6.137.58107 49640 0 49640 0 ESTABLISHED
    172.25.6.133.647 *.* 0 0 49152 0 LISTEN
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    2012 08 29 03:41:47
    PING 172.25.6.137: 56 data bytes 64 bytes from edns2 (172.25.6.137): icmp_seq=0. time=0.535 ms
    remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset disp
    ==============================================================================
    *idns1           195.26.151.151   3 u   49 1024  377     0.75   -0.071    0.05
    +idns2           195.26.151.151   3 u  166 1024  377     0.93    0.169    0.08
    clusternode1-pr 0.0.0.0 16 - - 1024 0 0.00 0.000 16000.0
    +clusternode2-pr idns1            4 u  410 1024  376     0.49   -0.154   15.12
    172.25.6.133.647 172.25.6.137.58107 49640 0 49640 0 FIN_WAIT_2
    172.25.6.133.647 *.* 0 0 49152 0 LISTEN
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Secondary DHCP Server:
    2012 08 29 03:41:41
    PING 172.25.6.133: 56 data bytes 64 bytes from edns1 (172.25.6.133): icmp_seq=0. time=1.26 ms
    remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset disp
    ==============================================================================
    *idns1           195.26.151.151   3 u  450 1024  377     0.92   -0.067    0.06
    +idns2           195.26.151.151   3 u  552 1024  377     0.96    0.237    0.08
    +clusternode1-pr idns1            4 u  360 1024  377     1.85   -0.528    1.51
    clusternode2-pr 0.0.0.0 16 - - 1024 0 0.00 0.000 16000.0
    172.25.6.137.647 *.* 0 0 49152 0 LISTEN
    172.25.6.137.58107 172.25.6.133.647 49640 0 49640 0 ESTABLISHED
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    2012 08 29 03:41:45
    PING 172.25.6.133: 56 data bytes 64 bytes from edns1 (172.25.6.133): icmp_seq=0. time=1.36 ms
    remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset disp
    ==============================================================================
    *idns1           195.26.151.151   3 u  454 1024  377     0.92   -0.067    0.06
    +idns2           195.26.151.151   3 u  556 1024  377     0.96    0.237    0.08
    +clusternode1-pr idns1            4 u  364 1024  377     1.85   -0.528    1.51
    clusternode2-pr 0.0.0.0 16 - - 1024 0 0.00 0.000 16000.0
    172.25.6.137.647 *.* 0 0 49152 0 LISTEN
    172.25.6.137.58107 172.25.6.133.647 49640 0 49640 0 CLOSE_WAIT
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Thanks!

    Thanks, but had found a previous discussion with this hint and applied it.
    svccfg -s sendmail listprop shows config /local_only = false
    Yes, I would really love to fix the fault, but what I would really like is some hints as to how to debug ports under svc control.

  • Extended ACL for DHCP

    Hi,
    I'm having a problem creating an ACL to allow DHCP.
    I want to secure a VLAN running across our Cisco wireless network infrastructure to limit access as much as I can.
    Restricting access to limited ip addresses and ports is straightforward, but I can't seem to get the ACL correct to allow clients to obtain ip addresses via DHCP.
    I seem to remember that the ACL for DHCP was a little odd -this is what I currently have:
    permit udp any host 172.16.30.4 log
    permit tcp any host 172.16.30.4 log
    permit tcp 172.16.36.0 0.0.0.255 host 172.16.30.4 eq domain established log
    permit tcp 172.16.36.0 0.0.0.255 host 172.16.30.27 eq 8080 log
    permit tcp 172.16.36.0 0.0.0.255 host 172.16.30.82 eq 443 log
    deny ip any any (28 matches)
    172.16.30.4 is the DHCP server, and I would like to limit this to only the ports required for DHCP, but I haven't specified whilst debugging this problem - my inital config was for ports 67 and 68.
    I'm seeing traffic being logged against the deny ip any any, so I know the client is trying to send to the correct network etc.
    The IP helper address is configured on the interface and is 172.16.30.4.
    Can some one let me know what I'm missing.
    Cheers,
    Steve

    Hi,
    Thanks for the response - I'll try the ACL for DHCP shortly.
    With regard to the ACL:
    permit tcp 172.16.36.0 0.0.0.255 host 172.16.30.4 eq domain established log
    you are correct, that is for DNS.
    However, on reflection I believe I will need tcp and udp for this rule as the client device will update DNS dynamically when it obtains an IP address from DHCP and I seem to recall DNS updates require tcp port 53?
    Cheers,
    Steve

  • Using eDir as backend store for DHCP and DNS

    With SLES9 you can use LDAP as the backend for DHCP and DNS? Can you do
    this against eDIR? How? Do you manage it within iManager or still using
    the YAST2 tools?

    On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 14:29:30 +0000, edbmdave wrote:
    > With SLES9 you can use LDAP as the backend for DHCP and DNS? Can you do
    > this against eDIR? How? Do you manage it within iManager or still using
    > the YAST2 tools?
    Hmm, haven't tried that. I guess that it would be quite tricky. Even if
    you did manage to do it I don't think iManager would be able to see the
    config.
    Mark
    Mark Robinson
    Novell Volunteer SysOp
    One by one the penguins steal my sanity...

  • DNS record ownership for DHCP clients

    my configuration:
    dhcp/dns/dc installed on same system - Windows 2008 R2 SP1 in domain environment.
    all zones configured to secure updates only with aging and scavenging enabled
    dhcp servers are member of DNSupdateproxy group.
    dhcp are configured with standard domain user account (this user was made a member of dnsupdateproxy as well, DOES THAT MATTER?)
    dhcp scopes are configured with default DNS setup (force DNS update by DHCP)
    now...
    all DNS records for endpoint devices on dhcp lease (windows7, mac os X, ubuntu) are owned by SYSTEM
    in security tab for some DNS records i can see service account with write permission to record ( i believe this is desired state)
    in other records service account has no permission but timestamps are still updated by computer account (hostname$ has write permission). these records have pencil icon on computers in dhcp lease table.
    Problem with this (hostname$ has write permissions) is when user connect to network via VPN (obtains dhcp lease) it get's two records registered in DNS -> 1 record for ip distributed by dhcp server and 2nd record for his home private network.
    Have anyone seen this before?
    i've tried deleting DNS records / releasing ip on endpoint device (example win7). It would not register to DNS by DHCP. However if i do ipconfig /registerdns it will do it, but dhcp service account won't have permission no this record.

    Apparently it appears that DHCP may not be configured with credentials, DHCP DNS settings are not configured to force DHCP to register ALL requests, nor has the DHCP server itself have been added to the DnsUpdateProxy group. These are all prerequisites
    for DHCP to own all records, otherwise you will see default behavior, which is:
    By default, a Windows 2000 and newer statically configured machines will
    register their A record (hostname) and PTR (reverse entry) into DNS.
    If set to DHCP, a Windows 2000 or newer machine will request DHCP to allow
    the machine itself to register its own A record, but DHCP will register its PTR
    (reverse entry) record.
    The entity that registers the record in DNS, owns the record.
    In summary:
    Configure DHCP Credentials. The credentials only need to be a plain-Jane, non-administrator, user account. Give it a really strong password.
    Set DHCP properties, DNS tab, to update everything, whether the clients can or cannot.
    Add the DHCP server(s) to the Active Directory, Built-In DnsUpdateProxy security group.
    Make sure ALL other non-DHCP servers are NOT in the DnsUpdateProxy group. For example, some believe that the DNS servers or other DCs not running DHCP should be in it. They must be removed or it won't work.
    On Windows 2008 R2 or newer, DISABLE Name Protection.
    If DHCP is co-located on a Windows 2008 R2 or Windows 2012 DC, you can and must secure the DnsUpdateProxy group by running the following:
    dnscmd /config /OpenAclOnProxyUpdates 0
    Configure Scavenging one one DNS server. Set the NOREFRESH and REFRESH values combined to be equal or greater than the DHCP Lease length. What it scavenges will replicate to others anyway.
    DHCP Service Configuration, Dynamic DNS Updates, Scavenging, Static Entries, Timestamps, DnsUpdateProxy Group, DHCP Credentials, prevent duplicate DNS records, DHCP has a "pen" icon, and more...
    Published by Ace Fekay, MCT, MVP DS on Aug 20, 2009 at 10:36 AM  3758  2 
    http://msmvps.com/blogs/acefekay/archive/2009/08/20/dhcp-dynamic-dns-updates-scavenging-static-entries-amp-timestamps-and-the-dnsproxyupdate-group.aspx 
    Good summary:
    How Dynamic DNS behaves with multiple DHCP servers on the same Domain?
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/winserverNIS/thread/e9d13327-ee75-4622-a3c7-459554319a27
    DNS Record Ownership and the DnsUpdateProxy Group
     http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd334715(v=ws.10).aspx
    DNS Record Ownership and the DnsUpdateProxy Group
    "... to protect against unsecured records or to permit members of the DnsUpdateProxy group to register records in zones that allow only secured dynamic updates, you must create a dedicated (NON-ADMIN) user account and
    configure DHCP servers to perform DNS dynamic updates with the credentials of this account (user name, password, and domain). Multiple DHCP servers can use the credentials of one dedicated user account."
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd334715(WS.10).aspx
    DNS record ownership and the DnsUpdateProxy group
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/winserverNIS/thread/b17c798c-c4b2-4624-926c-4d2676e68279/
    Ace Fekay
    MVP, MCT, MCITP/EA, MCTS Windows 2008/R2 & Exchange 2007, Exchange 2010 EA, MCSE & MCSA 2003/2000, MCSA Messaging 2003
    Microsoft Certified Trainer
    Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
    Technical Blogs & Videos: http://www.delawarecountycomputerconsulting.com/
    This post is provided AS-IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.

  • Design for DHCP redundancy.

    Hi,
    Can somebody advice , how can i have dhcp server redundancy in my network. I need to design a network that will have around 30 vlans spanned across 50 buildings.

    Hi Renzil,
    I'm actually working on a similar solution at work at the moment. There are a couple of options (some have mentioned already)
    1. Have two dhcp servers in different locations, with the same scopes and settings configured. Add the IP helper address for both servers to any device that needs to relay dhcp broadcasts. Then choose either;
    a) Active/Standby - Configure the dhcp servers to act as a Primary/Secondary, by disabling all scopes on the secondary server until a situation arises where you need to failover. When you failover, enable the scopes on the secondary dhcp server. Be careful to prevent the Primary from giving lease when it comes back online.
    b) Active/Active - Split the scopes across both dhcp servers in a 20/80 or 30/70 configuration as mentioned above. You will need to ensure the same reservations are configured on each dhcp server.
    c) Active/Active - Disable some scopes on one of the servers, and have the same scopes active on the other server. When failover occurs, enable the scopes that are disabled on the server that is still reachable. Again be careful of the failed server issuing leases when it comes back online.
    2. If you have the option, Windows Server 2008 Enterprise now offers High Availability Clustering for DHCP servers. This is a good solution because the DHCP database is shared between the two DHCP servers, so you don't need to worry about duplicate addresses being issued. This also works across geopgraphically dispersed sites, which is great if you have multiple data centres in different locations. You need to have a storage solution in place thatcan replicate the DHCP database to the failover location.
    HTH
    Paul

  • VLAN on WAP (how do i make it use my existing ASA for DHCP requests?)

    Hey guys,
    I have a ASA 5520 and a subinterface created for my VLAN 54. However i set up the WAP, but it only seems to work if i actually hardset an IP address on the PC. How do i make it look at the firewall as the DHCP server. If i plug into an access port, it will automatically look at the firewall for DHCP, but not on wireless...
    Can you help?
    I want it to use the same ip addresses as the LAN is using.

    There should be no difference between connecting via an AP and access port.  Double-check your ip helper-address, but if access ports work then that should be fine.
    Can you post your AP config?  We should make sure there's nothing misconfigured on that.  Please also post your switchport config.

  • Is it possible to use the old iMac 2010 21inch as an external monitor for my 15inch Macbook retina?

    Is it possible to use the old iMac 2010 21inch as an external monitor for my 15inch Macbook retina? E.g. Using a mini-display cable to connect from the imac mini display port to thunderbolt port on my macbook.

    Apple shows only the 27" version supporting Target Display Mode.
    <http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3924>

  • HT201272 is it possible to not use a credit card, to download already purchase apps for iPhone to iPad?

    is it possible to not use a credit card, to download already purchase apps for iPhone to iPad?

    Contact iTunes Customer Service and request assistance
    Use this Link  >  Apple  Support  iTunes Store  Contact

  • Is it possible to create a configuration profile that will install multiple network printers and their associated drivers

    Is it possible to create a configuration profile that will install multiple network printers and their associated drivers?
    I was not able to find profile manager on my employer's installation of 10.6 Server. Is this only a feature of 10.7/10.8 server?

    10.6 server does not have profile manager, profile manager is only available in 10/7 and 10.8 server
    for 10.6 server you'll need to use wgm and server admin
    printer management with 10.6, I recommend you read the relevant server manuals regarding
    print server and user management, printer management

  • Is it possible to use Acrobat 9 sdk to check accessibility?

    Is it possible to use Acrobat 9 sdk to check accessibility of a pdf and get whether the pdf is accessible or not?
    I've found InvokeAccessibilityCheckerCmdSnip.cpp that seems to call accessibility validator, but I don't know if that will make what I need.
    I've been asked to include an accessibility validation utility in a Content Server after loading a pdf.
    Thanks in advance.

    Post your question in the 'Acrobat Developers SDK' forum.

Maybe you are looking for