Is it possible to disable the Force closur button from QE11?

Hi
Is it possible to disable the Force closur button from QE11 transaction code level?
Thanks and Regards
GVD

Hello Chanti,
Disabling the force closure button is not possible by creating a security role as security restrictions work on organizational elements like co codes, plant, s loc etc.
Could you please let me know if the requirement is for all users or few users.
Also you may want to try the transaction variant/ Screen variant option. The force button is available in program SAPLQEEM and Function ABFO which you need to tick the inactive button during recording. Take help from ABAP if required.
Thanks
Sahil

Similar Messages

  • Is there a way to remove or disable the "Clear List" button from the downloads list?

    Is there a way to remove or disable the "Clear List" button in the downloads list? I like to _keep_ my list populated with what I've downloaded but occasionally end up with it getting clicked on accident and lose the whole thing. Given that "Tools > Clear Recent History" dialog can accomplish the same thing I find Clear List to be irritating. So can I get rid of it in any way?
    == This happened ==
    Just once or twice
    == my brain lapsed on me ==
    == User Agent ==
    Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/5.0.375.70 Safari/533.4

    Hello Chris.
    # go into ''Help > Troubleshooting Information...''
    # click ''Open Containing Folder''
    # in the folder that appears (new windo in windows explorer), go into the folder ''chrome''
    # open the file ''userChrome.css'' with a text editor
    # at the end of the file, in a new line, add the following code:
    <code>
    button#clearListButton
    </code>
    I haven't tested this, but it should work flawlessly. You can always erase this line if you want the button back. This will only work on your Firefox profile. If you want these changes to span across all Firefox users on your computer, please tell me.

  • Is it possible to disable the Export Application Button/functionality

    Hi fellows,
    I need to disable the export button/functionality in a customer's apex installation (3.2.1) as part of the security measures.
    Customer do not want developers to be able to export the applications they have access to. As the internal application is not editable (is it with some sort of trick??) , does anyone ever had this requirement and know how to do it?
    Thanks in advance for your support.
    JP

    Hello,
    >> I need to disable the export button/functionality in a customer's apex installation (3.2.1) as part of the security measures.
    >> this need applies for both development and production enviroments although if a solution is available, it will be first tried in the development enviroment.
    I agree with Tyler, this is indeed a really strange request. If your customer can’t rely on his developers, I would say you have a problem. I’m saying it because disabling the export button, even if it’s possible, doesn’t really give you any kind of protection. A malicious developer can still export APEX application using the Java utility APEXExport; it can be done with SQL Developer; it can also be done on a page level, and I only named the documented options.
    I don’t think this type of action should be considered for a development environment. Of course, the production environment is a completely different ball game. You can use the APEX run-time only environment, and by that neutralize most of the developer related “risks”.
    Just my 2 ¢,
    Arie.

  • Is it possible to remove the window control buttons from a vi? I am writing a vi for a production environment and don't want users to be able to quit the application.

    Jim
    LV 2013

    On a production line PC, the VI should never be stopped. My hope would be that a SysAdmin could bypass loading the VI during a reboot in order to work on the machine. I have tried deselecting everything but the run button, but when ever I do this on the top-level application, it ignores me. After clicking on OK, if I re-open the customize window appearance on the top-level application dialog, all of the defaults are checked again.
    Jim
    LV 2013

  • Is it possible to disable the 'edit layout' link on the record detail page

    Is it possible to disable the 'edit layout' link on the record detail page? Not the homepages, I know there is a switch for that, but I thought there was one for the detail pages?
    I want to disable this as I dont want users saving their own layouts, they must stick to the related sections defined in the default layout. The problem is that if they are to have access to certain related lists when an opportunity is of a certain type but NOT other types. If they have saved the layout (using the 'Edit Layout' link), and change the record type, they will see related sections that have been set to 'Not available' in the default layout (ie step 4) for that 'type'.

    Robbo, at this time it not possible to disable the Edit Layout on the record detail page.

  • Is it possible to disable the screen saver for a certain app?

    Is it possible to disable the screen saver just while a certain application is running?
    The app seems to crash when the screen saver comes on.
    Just so you know, application I'm using is Hogwasher; a newsgroup reader.

    Not really. Just disable it manually when you run that application. Then, send off a bug report to the app's developer and tell him to update it for the latest Tiger. Alternatively, use another newsgroup reader.

  • Is it possible to disable the OAWebBeanConstants.IGNORE_MESSAGES

    greetings all .... is it possible to disable the OAWebBeanConstants.IGNORE_MESSAGES . i have this ....................
    {                  OAMessageTextInputBean bi = (OAMessageTextInputBean)webBean.findIndexedChildRecursive("BI") ;
    System.out.println("BI"+bi.getValue(pageContext));
    if ((bi.getValue(pageContext)) != null)
    {                pageContext.setForwardURLToCurrentPage(//"OA.jsp?page=/oracle/apps/ap/MainPG",
    null,
    false, // Retain AM
    OAWebBeanConstants.ADD_BREAD_CRUMB_YES,
    OAWebBeanConstants.IGNORE_MESSAGES);
    System.out.println( "PM");
    OAApplicationModule am = (OAApplicationModule)pageContext.getApplicationModule(webBean);
    String paramPR = prnum2;
    Serializable paramPRParamList[] = { paramPR};
    am.invokeMethod("paidManuallyUpdate", paramPRParamList);
    System.out.println( " THE VALUE OF THE Cancel RB IS " + canx.getValue(pageContext));
    prnum1.setValue(pageContext, "");
    pReason1.setValue(pageContext , "");
    //either one of these confirmations will work . i use one or the other
    throw new OAException("Payment Has Been Updated To Paid Manually", OAException.CONFIRMATION);
    //or
    OAException msg = new OAException("Updated To Paid Manually", OAException.CONFIRMATION);
    pageContext.putDialogMessage(msg);
    the problem is if i include the setForwardURL my confirm messages dont work. if i dont include the setForward they work.
    is there a way to do the setForwars so i can redirect the page and make the table inactive and also use the confimations. i can see its going past my system.prints. it just isnt popping up my confirmations as i believe its due to the IGNORE_MESSAGES.
    any insight ....
    cheers.

    Hi,
    SetForward*()...It lets the current page processing complete. Your following code will complete its processing, after that it will be forwarded to next page.
    ForwardImmediately.... Forwards immediately without letting remaining code process.
    However, a good thing is pageContext of the same page is forwarded. That means, if you did pageContext.putDialog(message), in current page, that will be forwarded in both the cases to next page. Hence, for your problem...
    use putDialog method, as stated in previous post and
    use forward url as CONFIRMATION, NOT AS ERROR OR IGNORE_MESSAGE.
    pageContext.setForwardURLToCurrentPage(//"OA.jsp?page=/oracle/apps/ap/MainPG",
    null,
    false, // Retain AM
    OAWebBeanConstants.ADD_BREAD_CRUMB_YES,
    OAException.CONFIRMATION); //WHAT YOU HAVE PUT IN DIALOGS AND WANT TO SHOW IS CONFIRMATION.
    Please try this.
    Abdul Wahid

  • Is it possible to disable the optimized compiler in LabVIEW 2010

    Hello,
    I have a project that take 3 minutes in LabVIEW 8.6 to build and now with LabVIEW 2010 it take 10.5 minutes. 3x more longer.
    In fact my project as 61 .lvproj for a total of 4300 vi's that take 1 hour to build. If I interpolate, the entire build process will take 3 hours in LabVIEW 2010. This is not acceptable
    I know that the new compiler optimize the code for better performance, but if I don't need better performance.
    Is it possible to disable the optimized compiler in LabVIEW 2010 with an INI key in LabVIEW.ini.
    Dany Allard
    Dany Allard
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Jarrod S. wrote:
    One Application Builder setting you might try out to make builds go much more quickly is the Remove Unused Members of Project Libraries checkbox and the Modify Project Library File after Removi....
    This can drastically cut down the build times. Note, however, that this option does not work well if your application will load external plug-in VIs when it runs, because the libraries of those plug-in VIs may conflict with the modified libraries in the executable file. If you don't have a plug-in architecture, this will not affect you.
    The "Remove unused members of project libraries" was already selected but not the "Modify project library file after removing unused members" and selecting this cut the build time from 10.5 min to 4 min.
    Thank you Jarrod for this tips
    Dany
    Dany Allard

  • My kids use firefox on my computer. Is it possible to disable the private browsing feature so they can not go on and use it ?

    I want the computer to keep a history of all the site they have searched, but can not know for sure if they turn on/off the private browsing function. Is it possible to disable the private browsing function and put a lock / password on it ?
    Thanks,
    David

    Even if it was possible to remove or disable "Private Browsing" then that still won't make it impossible to delete private data like visited websites (history) or cache or cookies.<br />
    There are a lot of ways to clear such data, either via [[Clear Recent History]] or directly by deleting the History in the Library or sidebar.<br />
    Private Browsing makes it easier because all data is kept in memory and nothing is saved to disk, so nothing needs to be removed.<br />
    <br />
    If you want to see which sites have been visited then you should look at others means outside Firefox like a router or firewall with a password protected logging feature that can't be bypassed or a program like Wireshark.
    * http://www.wireshark.org/download.html
    * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireshark
    See also:
    * http://kb.mozillazine.org/Parental_controls

  • Is it possible to disable the camera on the nano 2 gen.  My grandaughter is in boarding school and no cameras are allowed.

    is it possible to disable the camera on a nano 2nd generation?  My grandaughter is in boarding school, and they do not allow any form of camera.

    Specs for iPod nano 2nd gen >  http://manuals.info.apple.com/en_US/iPod_nano_2nd_Gen_Features_Guide.pdf
    No camera.

  • Is it possible to disable the play button when exporting to exe or app files?

    Is it possible to disable the play button when exporting to exe or app files? Can the app just boot up without the playbutton?

    Are you talking about auto play option or the play button on Playbar?
    I just checked the EXE ran fine without requiring any play button to start as per my settings.
    Is this waht you are looking to achieve?
    Thanks,
    Anjaneai

  • Is it possible to disable the trackpad when a wireless or usb mouse is present? With Lion 10.7.2, I can not find the checkbox that was there before I installed Lion. Is the option gone on Lion?

    Is it possible to disable the trackpad when a wireless or usb mouse is present? With Lion 10.7.2, I can not find the checkbox that was there before I installed Lion. Is the option gone on Lion?

    There is no BIOS in OS X. There is only the EFI stored in ROM that is not user modifiable. OS X is probably checking Bay 0 for the boot drive since that is where it should be. It won't check the Tempo drive since it is treated like an external drive. I suggest you open Startup Disk preferences to see if the Tempo device is selected as the boot device. If it isn't, then select it. That will probably shave off a few seconds in the startup time.

  • Can I disable the force click action for 'tap to click' in the 2015 version?

    In the 2015 MBP version can I disable the force click action in system preferences, and use to tap to click as with previous trackpads?

    Hey petunia42,
    You should be able to disable Force Click on the new MacBook Pros, as noted in the following article:
    To turn off Force click, deselect the “Force click and haptic feedback” checkbox. This will disable the functionality described in the Trackpad preferences pane.
    Using a Force Touch trackpad - Apple Support
    Cheers,
    - Brenden

  • Is it possible to disable the autodimm function, so that the clock can be displayed all the time?

    Is it possible to disable the auto dim function, so that the clock can be displayed all the time?

    At this time it is not possible. Sorry. 
    Being able to do so would dramatically decrease your iPod's battery life between charges.
    B-rock

  • If my iPhone is stolen and the thief shut the phone down, I wouldn't be able to locate it anymore.  Is it possible to disable the possibility to shut down the phone when a passcode lock is set up?

    If my iPhone is stolen and the thief shut the phone down, I wouldn't be able to locate it anymore.
    Is it possible to disable the possibility to shut down the phone when a passcode lock is set up?
    enable prohibition shutdown option, with out a jail break tweek
    Apple should think about this, if not already in the new IOS 7

    No.
    The battery will run out sooner or later anyway, even if you could prevent shutdown.
    iOS 7 includes a feature that prevents anyone wiping and then re-setting up the phone without your AppleID and password.

Maybe you are looking for