Is it possible to disable the multitouch feature?

I hate this two finger scrolling nonsense, I find it counter-intuitive and obnoxious (if I wanted Mac interface, I'd've bought a Mac, you guys!). Is it possible to disable it and use the normal, common sense single finger scrolling that I know, love, and desperately want to return to?
My specific laptop is HP Pavilion G7, Intel i3 Processor, Windows 7.

You can find a solution already posted here for this issue
//Click on Kudos and Accept as Solution if my reply was helpful and answered your question//
I am an HP employee!!

Similar Messages

  • Is it possible to disable the facetime feature or put security on it? Thanks!

    Is it possible to disable the facetime feature or put security on it? Thanks!

    You can disable FaceTime via Restrictions.  So head to Settings -> General -> Restrictions and make sure that at least the FaceTime restriction has been turned On.
    B-rock

  • I have a DV8T-1000 with an i7-720 CPU. Is it possible to disable the hyperthreading feature?

    in the bios, can't find options for disable....

    Jarrod S. wrote:
    One Application Builder setting you might try out to make builds go much more quickly is the Remove Unused Members of Project Libraries checkbox and the Modify Project Library File after Removi....
    This can drastically cut down the build times. Note, however, that this option does not work well if your application will load external plug-in VIs when it runs, because the libraries of those plug-in VIs may conflict with the modified libraries in the executable file. If you don't have a plug-in architecture, this will not affect you.
    The "Remove unused members of project libraries" was already selected but not the "Modify project library file after removing unused members" and selecting this cut the build time from 10.5 min to 4 min.
    Thank you Jarrod for this tips
    Dany
    Dany Allard

  • My kids use firefox on my computer. Is it possible to disable the private browsing feature so they can not go on and use it ?

    I want the computer to keep a history of all the site they have searched, but can not know for sure if they turn on/off the private browsing function. Is it possible to disable the private browsing function and put a lock / password on it ?
    Thanks,
    David

    Even if it was possible to remove or disable "Private Browsing" then that still won't make it impossible to delete private data like visited websites (history) or cache or cookies.<br />
    There are a lot of ways to clear such data, either via [[Clear Recent History]] or directly by deleting the History in the Library or sidebar.<br />
    Private Browsing makes it easier because all data is kept in memory and nothing is saved to disk, so nothing needs to be removed.<br />
    <br />
    If you want to see which sites have been visited then you should look at others means outside Firefox like a router or firewall with a password protected logging feature that can't be bypassed or a program like Wireshark.
    * http://www.wireshark.org/download.html
    * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireshark
    See also:
    * http://kb.mozillazine.org/Parental_controls

  • If my iPhone is stolen and the thief shut the phone down, I wouldn't be able to locate it anymore.  Is it possible to disable the possibility to shut down the phone when a passcode lock is set up?

    If my iPhone is stolen and the thief shut the phone down, I wouldn't be able to locate it anymore.
    Is it possible to disable the possibility to shut down the phone when a passcode lock is set up?
    enable prohibition shutdown option, with out a jail break tweek
    Apple should think about this, if not already in the new IOS 7

    No.
    The battery will run out sooner or later anyway, even if you could prevent shutdown.
    iOS 7 includes a feature that prevents anyone wiping and then re-setting up the phone without your AppleID and password.

  • Is it possible to disable the 'edit layout' link on the record detail page

    Is it possible to disable the 'edit layout' link on the record detail page? Not the homepages, I know there is a switch for that, but I thought there was one for the detail pages?
    I want to disable this as I dont want users saving their own layouts, they must stick to the related sections defined in the default layout. The problem is that if they are to have access to certain related lists when an opportunity is of a certain type but NOT other types. If they have saved the layout (using the 'Edit Layout' link), and change the record type, they will see related sections that have been set to 'Not available' in the default layout (ie step 4) for that 'type'.

    Robbo, at this time it not possible to disable the Edit Layout on the record detail page.

  • Is it possible to disable the screen saver for a certain app?

    Is it possible to disable the screen saver just while a certain application is running?
    The app seems to crash when the screen saver comes on.
    Just so you know, application I'm using is Hogwasher; a newsgroup reader.

    Not really. Just disable it manually when you run that application. Then, send off a bug report to the app's developer and tell him to update it for the latest Tiger. Alternatively, use another newsgroup reader.

  • Is it possible to disable the OAWebBeanConstants.IGNORE_MESSAGES

    greetings all .... is it possible to disable the OAWebBeanConstants.IGNORE_MESSAGES . i have this ....................
    {                  OAMessageTextInputBean bi = (OAMessageTextInputBean)webBean.findIndexedChildRecursive("BI") ;
    System.out.println("BI"+bi.getValue(pageContext));
    if ((bi.getValue(pageContext)) != null)
    {                pageContext.setForwardURLToCurrentPage(//"OA.jsp?page=/oracle/apps/ap/MainPG",
    null,
    false, // Retain AM
    OAWebBeanConstants.ADD_BREAD_CRUMB_YES,
    OAWebBeanConstants.IGNORE_MESSAGES);
    System.out.println( "PM");
    OAApplicationModule am = (OAApplicationModule)pageContext.getApplicationModule(webBean);
    String paramPR = prnum2;
    Serializable paramPRParamList[] = { paramPR};
    am.invokeMethod("paidManuallyUpdate", paramPRParamList);
    System.out.println( " THE VALUE OF THE Cancel RB IS " + canx.getValue(pageContext));
    prnum1.setValue(pageContext, "");
    pReason1.setValue(pageContext , "");
    //either one of these confirmations will work . i use one or the other
    throw new OAException("Payment Has Been Updated To Paid Manually", OAException.CONFIRMATION);
    //or
    OAException msg = new OAException("Updated To Paid Manually", OAException.CONFIRMATION);
    pageContext.putDialogMessage(msg);
    the problem is if i include the setForwardURL my confirm messages dont work. if i dont include the setForward they work.
    is there a way to do the setForwars so i can redirect the page and make the table inactive and also use the confimations. i can see its going past my system.prints. it just isnt popping up my confirmations as i believe its due to the IGNORE_MESSAGES.
    any insight ....
    cheers.

    Hi,
    SetForward*()...It lets the current page processing complete. Your following code will complete its processing, after that it will be forwarded to next page.
    ForwardImmediately.... Forwards immediately without letting remaining code process.
    However, a good thing is pageContext of the same page is forwarded. That means, if you did pageContext.putDialog(message), in current page, that will be forwarded in both the cases to next page. Hence, for your problem...
    use putDialog method, as stated in previous post and
    use forward url as CONFIRMATION, NOT AS ERROR OR IGNORE_MESSAGE.
    pageContext.setForwardURLToCurrentPage(//"OA.jsp?page=/oracle/apps/ap/MainPG",
    null,
    false, // Retain AM
    OAWebBeanConstants.ADD_BREAD_CRUMB_YES,
    OAException.CONFIRMATION); //WHAT YOU HAVE PUT IN DIALOGS AND WANT TO SHOW IS CONFIRMATION.
    Please try this.
    Abdul Wahid

  • Is it possible to disable the optimized compiler in LabVIEW 2010

    Hello,
    I have a project that take 3 minutes in LabVIEW 8.6 to build and now with LabVIEW 2010 it take 10.5 minutes. 3x more longer.
    In fact my project as 61 .lvproj for a total of 4300 vi's that take 1 hour to build. If I interpolate, the entire build process will take 3 hours in LabVIEW 2010. This is not acceptable
    I know that the new compiler optimize the code for better performance, but if I don't need better performance.
    Is it possible to disable the optimized compiler in LabVIEW 2010 with an INI key in LabVIEW.ini.
    Dany Allard
    Dany Allard
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Jarrod S. wrote:
    One Application Builder setting you might try out to make builds go much more quickly is the Remove Unused Members of Project Libraries checkbox and the Modify Project Library File after Removi....
    This can drastically cut down the build times. Note, however, that this option does not work well if your application will load external plug-in VIs when it runs, because the libraries of those plug-in VIs may conflict with the modified libraries in the executable file. If you don't have a plug-in architecture, this will not affect you.
    The "Remove unused members of project libraries" was already selected but not the "Modify project library file after removing unused members" and selecting this cut the build time from 10.5 min to 4 min.
    Thank you Jarrod for this tips
    Dany
    Dany Allard

  • Is it possible to disable the camera on the nano 2 gen.  My grandaughter is in boarding school and no cameras are allowed.

    is it possible to disable the camera on a nano 2nd generation?  My grandaughter is in boarding school, and they do not allow any form of camera.

    Specs for iPod nano 2nd gen >  http://manuals.info.apple.com/en_US/iPod_nano_2nd_Gen_Features_Guide.pdf
    No camera.

  • How can I disable the system feature which automatically restarts applications i had open during a previous session ?

    How can I disable the system feature which automatically restarts applications i had open during a previous session ?

    When you log out, uncheck the box to reopen applications. If you're still using 10.7.3, then you will have to uncheck the back with each shutdown or restart.
    10.7.4 update was suppose to fix it that when you uncheck the box, it should remain unchecked for restarts after that.
    For the resume features, check this link:
    http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-13727_7-20083707-263/managing-mac-os-x-lions-applic ation-resume-feature/?tag=mncol;title

  • Is it possible to disable the play button when exporting to exe or app files?

    Is it possible to disable the play button when exporting to exe or app files? Can the app just boot up without the playbutton?

    Are you talking about auto play option or the play button on Playbar?
    I just checked the EXE ran fine without requiring any play button to start as per my settings.
    Is this waht you are looking to achieve?
    Thanks,
    Anjaneai

  • How can i disable the resume features of OS Lion?

    How can i disable the resume features of OS Lion?

    http://www.apple.com/feedback/macosx.html and select bug report as type. BTW, the per app turn off works. If you want to globally turn off resume, empty the Containers and Saved Applications State folders in your home Library folder and lock them.

  • Disable the TV features entirely? (IdeaCentre B320)

    Is there a way to disable the TV features on an IdeaCentre B320 entirely?
    I work with a user who is let's just say, not computer-savvy who has a B320. She has has no need for the television functions at all, and is often confused when she accidentally activate it either as PIP or full screen, which happens a LOT more often than you might expect.
    She's not satisfied with the simple path to get back to her Windows desktop, so I'm hoping there's some way to just disable the TV altogether. Can anyone think of a way to do this?

    Some things yoi could try if noone comes up with a defintive answer.
    Try uninstalling drivers and pull the card though have my doubts.  Take away the remote and tape the tv on the side might be easier.

  • HT4623 I just lost my iPhone 4, then someone picked it up & disable the tracking feature.

    Note I just lost my iPhone 4, then someone picked it up & disable the tracking feature in iCloud.
    If that person use this stolen iPhone, can apple store trackiong him & blocked him? or even reset the phone status to default. Serial # of this iPhone is 86107QW6A4T.
    Note iPhone is now a very personal item in life, we may drop & lost, or even stolen or by attack to kinapped, strongly request Apple can do something to protect their loyalty customers & their image, no one can stole iPhone, no one can use something which not belong to them, once the device is registrate, only change with by actual owner's authorization whne them sell or gift.
    Even your turn off the tracking feature of Find My iPhone, but we still can found by seria # with GPS founction. Is this against the law of privacy?

    The phone can no longer be tracked by you if it's not signed into your apple id, not even by Apple. It can't be tracked by the serial number either.
    The registration of the device can be changed by the person who has access to the serial number, which I know is unfortunate, but that's how it works.
    It's against the law to steal an iPhone, for sure.
    If the tracking feature of Find my iPhone is turned off, the device is no longer broadcasting a GPS signal. If someone were to sign into the phone with their apple id, it would then be trackable by them but by no one else
    It's against Apple's Privacy Policy to access personal information on the phone unless they explicitly need it for troubleshooting purposes. This is unfortunately not one of those instances.
    The best thing you can do is call your local law enforcement and report the phone as stolen

Maybe you are looking for