Is it possible to ignore "Rigid relationships between attributes cannot be changed" when using ProcessUpdate for Dimension?

As per the title is it possible to ignore "Rigid relationships between attributes cannot be changed" when using ProcessUpdate for Dimension?
We have a case where very rarely an item might have been miscategorised so the brand is manually changed. We want this dimension to be rigid to speed up ProcessUpdate.
We do a ProcessFull each night, so it will get corrected then, but during the hourly updates we would just like to ignore this error if possible?

Hello,
The rigid relationship should be defined when the members will not change over time. Here are some threads regarding rigid relationship for your reference, please see:
Processing OLAP Cube: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/17a55593-9543-404e-a579-0a011965585d/processing-olap-cube?forum=sqlanalysisservices
Flexible and rigid relationship: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/2d8f5443-065d-4485-9385-6f0b5fa417da/flexible-and-rigid-relationship?forum=sqlanalysisservices
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here.
Regards,
Elvis Long
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

Is there any way to stop the delay between different sets of speakers when using airport express?

Is there any way to stop the delay between different sets of speakers when using airport express?

Unfortunately, I don't have either a Slingbox or iHome speakers so I won't be able to reproduce any of the issues you are having. With the fact that you live in large apartment complex would still lead me to believe that Wi-Fi interference may be the reason that you are having streaming issues.
I suggest you perform a simple site survey, using utilities like iStumbler, or AirRadar to determine potential areas of interference, and then, try to either eliminate or significantly reduce them where possible.

Does anyone know if it's possible to have more than 1 SCO in a Manifest when using Presenter 7?

I have several presentations that I want to be able to distribute to a third party SCORM LMS server. I want to have one Manifest and then have each presentation / quizz as an individual SCO so that I will end up with 1 course rather than having a manifest for each presentation. HELP!!!!!!! I have called Adobe Support and haven't been able to get any help at all. Well, I did get some help on working on my patience I've even called Sales thinking I may be able to get some help there - no such luck. If anyone knows how to do this please let me know!!! I've already spent about 40 hours trying different things and am at my whits end (or nearly). I am desperate
Shelby

Shelby,
Unless you find a way to modify the manifest file such that it accounts for each presentation as a separate SCO, then I'm afraid that the answer is no.
Unfortunately as a default, Presenter "sees" each PPT deck as a single SCO even if you have multiple quizzes within a PowerPoint deck...and because the slides contained within one presentation equate to one published "course," the net effect is a single SCO per deck.
I'm hoping that others will weigh in here, but at this point, I really don't think you'll be able to consolidate multiple presentations and come up with a multi-SCO course....Presenter just doesn't provide it.
Rob
http://www.robrode.com/yabb/

On the Apple Watch, has anyone figured out a way (if possible) to remove some of the redundant auto responses available when using Messages?

There are some responses that always show which I would never use, such as BRB, that I'd like to completely remove. There are other responses that are excessively redundant. I don't need Thx, Thanks, Thank you. and Thanks! as separate available auto responses every single time. Anyone else had better luck figuring that out?
Overall I'm really liking the Watch so far. The only thing bringing it down is sone of those small details.

Visit the Apple Watch app, then go to My Watch > Messages > Default Replies.
You can add your own but there will still be Apple auto default replies too.
Kinda lame. Hope there's a new option to get rid of those in the future. I'd rather ALWAYS dictate and not have those 'smart responses' there at all.

Is it possible to preset to JPEG High when using 'Save for Web...'?

Hi,
I am using photoshop elements 10. When I am ready to save an image under 'SAVE FOR WEB..' can I preset it to 'JPEG HIGH' cos right now it will pop up 'GIF'.
When I am using PSE2, I am able to launch it as JPEG HIGH. Now, I have to click on the popdown menu to select 'JPEG High'.

You need to right-click on the PSE desktop icon and choose "Run as Administrator".
Then, open a file in PSE, use Save for Web and change all the settings to what you prefer. Hold down the Alt key and the "Done" button will change to a "Remember" button. Click it and then save your image. The settings will be saved and you do not have to run PSE as an administrator again.
Ken

Are there any known issues with speed between excel 2003 and 2010 when using WAAS?

Request asked by customer. Thought I would run this by the forum first.
Can you please raise a ticket with Cisco TAC asking why Excel files in 97-2003 file format cannot be fully optimized when compared to the same file being saved in the latest file format?
When using the latest file format, the user experience is amazing and up to 100x faster to open and save files. Our testing has identified an issue with the older file format.

I deployed WAAS about 3 years ago. Part of the deployment was before and after testing. When the users used Office 2010 the results were good. When they used Office 2003 the results were terrible. Some files took minutes to open, some never opened. Solution was to upgrade to O2010.
Hope this helps.

Crmm_erm_cat and relationship between database questions and activities

Hello Guys,
Using this transaction, it´s possible to make the relationship between the questions from the solution database with activities, and it´s possible to locate some activities over there. These activities are not apearing. Is there something else in the transaction, or additional transaction, I have to execute, to make the crmm_erm_cat work fine?
cheers
Luiz David

Already solved, thanks

Problem with a 1:M relationship between two entity beans

I am having trouble trying to implement a 1:M relationship between two EJB2.0 entity beans using and EJBQL query. I have an ApplicantEJB, which contains a collection of phone numbers. The applicant table in the database has one primary key, applicant_id. The applicant_phones database table has a compound primary key--applicant_id and phone_type_id--so I have implemented a custom PK class to represent this, PhonePK. I have implemented a findByNameAndPhone method in my ejb-jar.xml file with the following syntax:
SELECT object(a) FROM applicants a, applicant_phones p where a.applicantID = p.applicantID and a.name = ?1 and p.phoneNumber = ?2
If I deploy this, Orion/OC4J translates the query in the orion-ejb-jar.xml with an incorrect reference to the applicant_phones.applicant_id column:
SELECT a.applicant_id FROM applicants a , applicant_phones p WHERE ((a.applicant_id = p.applicantID ) AND (a.name = ?) AND (p.phone_number = ? ))
I must have something wrong with the ApplicantEJB and PhoneEJB primary key mappings in my orion-ejb-jar.xml file, but I have tried many different combinations of values and keep getting them overwritten by the container with each deployment. Why is Orion/OC4J defaulting the applicant_id reference to the ob[i]Long postings are being truncated to ~1 kB at this time.

I have posted excerpts from my orion-ejb-jar.xml file in this posting: Problem mapping a 1:M relationship between two entity EJBs w/ a compound PK
Sorry for the duplicate postings, but I was getting errors on the submission.
April

Recently got a MacBook Pro. When I use it for work purposes, I plug in a large screen and key board. When in this mode I would like to shut off the laptop screen or even close the lid. Is that possible?

RECENTLY GOT A mACKbOOK PRO. WHEN USING IT FOR WORK PURPOSES I PLUG IN A LARGE SCREEN AND KEYBOARD, THAT WORKS FINE. HOWEVER WOULD LIKE TO CLOSE LID ON THE LAPTOP, OR AT LEAST SHUT DOWN THE LAPTOP SCREEN WHILE USING THE LARGE SCREEN. IS THAT POSSIBLE?

Hi Jim,
Craig is right on with his post. Hope he won't mind if I add the following link, as recently it has been noted by some posts here that there are some "quirks" with Clamshell Mode:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3131?viewlocale=en_US

1-to-1 Relationship Between UI and subVI Data Cluster

Discussion continued from here.
In summary:
JackDunaway wrote:
Yes,
I can see clear benefits in implementing this Idea - that is, if your
underlying datatype elements have a 1:1 relationship with the UI
elements.
I will
illustrate this point by showing some potential flaws in your example:
"Profile Running" and "Profile Complete" are mutually exclusive, no?
Wouldn't it be better to have a single enum named "Profile" with three
elements "Idle, Running, and Complete" for the underlying datatype?
Having two mutually exclusive pieces of data in an underlying datatype
is among my favorite of code smell indicators.
Also, the underlying datatype probably only needs "Forward Miles" and
"Reverse Miles" since "Total Miles" is derived. Exclude "Total Miles"
from the underlying cluster and just show the sum for display.
Another
argument against using a 1:1 relationship: the customer now wants to
multiply speed by -1 if Direction==Reverse and not show the Direction
enum on the UI. The data source (the VI that generates the data) would
need to be updated using your 1:1 relationship. Using underlying data
different from the display data, only the data client (the UI front
panel) needs to change. I would be much more inclined to service the UI
FP for a cosmetic upgrade rather than tracing the data source back
through the HMI framework, through TCP, back to the RT, back to FPGA...
Basically...
I question a perfectly overlapped Venn Diagram where the set of data
shown to the user equals the dataset used for underlying data
processing/messaging/storing. The underlying datatype should be as
stripped and streamlined as possible, while the display datatype can
inherit all the flair and post-processing that Upper Management wants to
see in a UI.
LabBEAN wrote:
<JackDunaway wrote
I will illustrate this point by showing some potential flaws in your example...
<LabBEAN response
The data you see maps directly to tags on the PLC.
<JackDunaway wrote
Yes, I can see clear benefits in implementing this Idea - that is, if your underlying datatype elements have a 1:1 relationship with the UI elements.
<LabBEAN response
JackDunaway wrote:
This is a good indicator that we're both aware at this point that I'm
missing something... in all seriousness, could you reply to the 1:1
argument? I really want to understand this Idea and learn how/if I need
to apply it to my own style (our last back-and-forth turned out to be an enlightening and introspective exercise for me).
***EDIT: By all means, please start a discussion on the LabVIEW board so we're not hindered by the Exchange's interface. ***
My long delayed response:
The indicators you see map to tags on the PLC. That is, we were connecting through OPC to an application on a PLC that was written ~15 years ago. I have a VI where I read a bunch of SVs (Shared Variables). Each SV is bound through OPC to a PLC tag. In the interest of disclosure, two 16-bit tags are required to represent each 32-bit mileage number. In the same subVI, I read each set of mileage tags, convert, and feed my subVI cluster indicator. The same is true for wheel size: three bits get converted to the enum. Regardless, though, I have one subVI that reads SVs and outputs the same "underlying data" cluster that is seen on the UI. The UI has a "Faults" cluster full of fault Booleans that follows the same logic. When the user configures a profile of steps, they do so via an array of "step" clusters (although the cluster look is hidden for aesthetics). It's the same thing as above except we write tags instead of reading them.
In my case, each set of 16-bit tags is worthless as two 16-bit numbers. They are only useful as a 32-bit mileage, so I don't pass around the raw 16-bit data. The same is true for the wheel size bits. My software can just as easily (in fact, more easily) operate on the enum. So, the underlying cluster from the subVI is programmatically useful and applicable to the UI. I would guess that the same is true for a lot of RT applications, where the read VI can have some intelligence to process the data into useful / applicable clusters.
There are going to be cases where "Upper Management" would like to see "flair and post-processing" as you say. Your speed illustration is a good example of this. There are also instances where the cluster works fine on the UI the way it is (like this one and many others that we've seen).
<JackDunaway wrote
"Profile Running" and "Profile Complete" are mutually exclusive, no?
Wouldn't it be better to have a single enum named "Profile" with three
elements "Idle, Running, and Complete" for the underlying datatype?
<LabBEAN response
Did you mean "not" mutually exclusive? We combined 3 "dependent" (not mutually exclusive) Booleans into an enum for Wheel Size, as I mentioned above. Not sure now why we went the other way with these two (this was 2 years ago). In any event, with regard to UI representation, I still pass a cluster out of my read-raw-data-and-process-into-cluster subVI up to the applicable queued state machines and to the UI.
<JackDunaway wrote
Having two mutually exclusive pieces of data in an underlying datatype
is among my favorite of code smell indicators.
<LabBEAN response
Working with applications written in ladder logic, it is not uncommon to see separate Booleans that indicate the same condition. This seems to be especially true when safety is a concern. That is, ladder Coil A ON and Coil B OFF == switch open. Coil A OFF and Coil B ON == switch closed. If you ever read OPC tags from Coil A and Coil B and the two are the same, you know the ladder is in transition (hasn't updated the tags). Throw that point out and read again.
I, too, appreciate our back-and-forths. Good discussion.
Certified LabVIEW Architect
Wait for Flag / Set Flag
Separate Views from Implementation for Strict Type Defs

Thanks for replying, Jason. Let me see if I can craft a coherent response after getting back up to speed...
(...later)
OK, let's go. I'm going to fully agree with you that LabVIEW imposes a strange constraint unique from most other languages where a Typedef defines two things: the underlying data structure, and also the view. A Strict Typedef should be more accurately deemed the Datatype-View-Definition, and a Typedef would be more accurately called the Datatype-Definition-and-View-Suggestion. And to be clear, there are two types of views: the programmer's view (a SubVI look and feel) and the UI view (what the user and Upper Management sees). (Finally, I admit I'm ignorant whether view or View is more a more appropriate term)
Linking the programmer's view to the datatype is perfectly fine with me, and based on your original Idea I think we both agree that's OK. I think we run into a disagreement where you have loosely tied the concept of "Strict TD" to "UI View".
Historically, I have used Strict Typedefs for the programmer's view (SubVIs), since I like to maintain a "functional UI" at the SubVI level. I don't use type definitions on User Interfaces - only Controls. That's the reason your Idea does not appeal to me, but perhaps if your Idea were implemented, it would appeal to me since View and Implementation would be divorced as separate entities within the Type Definition. (Does that classify as a Catch-22?) So, you're Idea is fundamentally suggesting that Type Definition .ctl files should be more accurately called "a container that holds both a Type Definition and any number of View Definitions as well".
Fundamentally, I think I finally understand the gist of your Idea: "let's ditch this weird constraint where View and Datatype are inextricably defined together in one file", and for that, I'll give Kudos to the original Idea. I got really tied up with the example you used to present the Idea, and plus I'm still learning a lot.
Additional thoughts:
This Idea reminds me of another: Tag XControl as Class View
We've still got some arguing to do on a 1:1 relationship between underlying datatype and UI presentation, so put your mean face back on:
Since our last conversation, interestingly, I have been on an anti-Typedef kick altogether. Why don't you drop some feedback on my attempt at a completely typedef-free UI framework?
a.lia-user-name-link[href="/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/88938"] {color: black;} a.lia-user-name-link[href="/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/88938"]:after {content: '';} .jrd-sig {height: 80px; overflow: visible;} .jrd-sig-deploy {float:left; opacity:0.2;} .jrd-sig-img {float:right; opacity:0.2;} .jrd-sig-img:hover {opacity:0.8;} .jrd-sig-deploy:hover {opacity:0.8;}

Error while adding a used relationship between the New DC and the Web DC

Hi Gurus
We are getting the Error in NWDS while Adding a used relationship between the New DC and the Web DC.
Steps what we are Done
1. Create the custom project from inactiveDC's
2.creating the project for the component crm/b2b in SHRAPP_1
3.After that we changed the application.xml and given the contect path.
4.Then we tried to add Dependency to the custom create DC we are getting the error saying that illegal deppendency : the compartment sap.com_CUSTCRMPRJ_1 of DC sap.com/home/b2b_xyz(sap.com.CUSTCRMPRJ_1) must explicitly use compartment sap.com_SAP-SHRWEB_1 of DC sap.com/crm/isa/ like that it was throwing the error.
so, we skip this step and tried to create the build then it is saying that build is failed..
Please help us in this regard.
Awaiting for ur quick response...
Regards
Satish

Hi
Please Ignore my above message.
Thanks for ur Response.
After ur valuble inputs we have added the required dependencies and sucessfully created the projects, then building of the projects was also sucessfully done and EAR file was created.
We need to deploy this EAR file in CRM Application Server by using the interface NWDI.
For Deploying the EAR into NWDI, we need to check-in the activites what i have created for EAR. once i check-in the activites ,the NWDI will deploy the EAR into CRM Application Server.
In the Activity Log we are able to check the Activities as Suceeded but the Deployment column is not showing any status.
When i right click on my activity Id the deployment summery is also disabled.
So finally my Question is that where can i get the deployment log file, and where can i check the deployment status for my application..
Any pointers in this regard would be of great help..
Awaiting for ur valuble Responses..
Regards
Satish

Relationship between unknown SAP-TABLES

Hi Folks,
Lets take a scenario of populating an ouput internal table with fields from 4 unknown sap tables(relation between the tables is unknown). How can we check the relationship between those tables to populate the internal table..? What are the possible ways to check the relationship between tables..?
Can u please help me on this.
Thanks n regards,
ram.

Hi Ram,
 I tried the following method to find relation between tables and i think it is quite useful. I hope this will be of some use to you.
-> Goto SE11 and display one of the tables.
-> Click on the Graphic icon on the toolbar or use shortcut ctrlshiftF11
-> It displays all the related tables by foreign key and even gives you all check tables involved. If the list is a long one, you can even use Find option to check if the other tables you are trying to find relation with, exist in the screen.
 Hope this Helps!! Do get back!!
Regards,
Naveenan.

Relationship between SAP R/3 and XI

Hi
I have a question. What kindoff relationship exists between an R/3 system and XI system. Is it 1:1 or 1:many.
Lets say i have a requirement where i have one r/3 system and 3 EAI system. I want to generate an idoc or rfc from a single r/3 which has to go through all the 3 EAI systems. Is it possible. If so how do i achieve it.
If not why is it so.
I was having a debate on this with my colleague at my work-place and i would like to hear from you all as to what your opinion is about this.
regards
Sameer

Hi Sameer,
it is no problem to implement an n:m relationship between systems. For example, you can have one R/3 sending an material master IDoc, configure in the receiver determination that this IDoc should go to 3 different receivers, than define for each receiver the interface as expected by the receiver (of course you will have to implement the payload mappings) and than choose three different adapters for sending the messages.
regards, frank

Display of relationships between nodes of multiple trees

Hello,
I am trying to develop a gui to display the relationship between multiple trees.
Tree1:------|---------------Tree2:----------------|--------Tree3:
------------|-------------------------------------|--------------
Root -------|----------------Root-----------------|--------Root
---Leaf1----|--------------------Node1------------|-----------LeafA
---Leaf2----|-----------------------Leaf11--------|-----------LeafB
---Leaf3----|-----------------------Leaf12--------|-----------LeafC
---Leaf4----|--------------------Node2
------------|-----------------------Leaf21
------------|-----------------------Leaf22
(The hyphens do not signifiy relationships, they are put there because the
preview takes away the blanks. The | characters are intended to act as separators
between adjacent trees.)
All the trees are scrollable and have been added to three different scrollpanes
and are displayed on a window. The relationships can only be between leaves
of the trees.
The only way I can figure out to show such relationships is by drawing lines
e.g. a line from Tree1.Leaf1 to Tree2.Leaf21 etc. Users may define relationships
by drawing lines from one tree node to another by dragging the mouse.
The lines may criss cross and there might be a lot of lines etc.
I would like to know about alternative ways to show such relationships on the
screen in a neater way.
I would also like a way to make lines "full fledged objects" e.g. they will get mouse
events such that actions can be triggered by double clicking or right clicking on a
line.
I would appreciate your help in this very much.
Best Regards,
Sandeepan

Joop Eggen and deriderj, thank you for your replies.
However, the JGraph framework is available only on Jsdk 1.4 and not on Jsdk 1.3.
I saw an item in the FAQ about the possibility of porting JGraph to 1.3 but there were
no links on the site for this.
I need to use Jsdk 1.3 as Jsdk1.4 is unsuported by the vendor of one of the tools that I need
to use and they do not have any plans to support 1.4 in the near future.
I would appreciate the forum's help in pointing out JGraph like functionality in Jsdk1.3 via some other API or maybe knowledge about whether someone has ported JGraph to Jsdk 1.3
Regards,
Sandeepan

PS-Relationship between the system status in wbs elements and activities.

Relationship between the system status in wbs elements and activities.
We have the following requeriment with the system status in PS. We have a project with complete technically status and we want to undo the complete technically status in one activity without changing the complete technically status in the WBS element or the project.
The reason is that after putting the complete technically status, users have to change the values in the P.O. We don´t want "open" all the project and we only need to "open" the activity where the P.O. are in.
Is that possible? How is connected the system status between activities, wbs elements and the project son I can change the status in the below step without changing the higher steps?
Thanks in advance.

Hi Bala
Yes, you have put it rather correctly.
We use WBS elements for booking and posting time (client requirement). So what I am looking for is WBS Elements with the system status TERL (Time and Expense Released).
I talked of the deletion flag also, because a WBS element flagged for deletion can't be used. It's one of the criteria to screen the WBS elements.
I hope it's clearer now.
Vinitha.

Is it possible to ignore "Rigid relationships between attributes cannot be changed" when using ProcessUpdate for Dimension?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for