Is It possible to keep users behind WSA IPs without change?

Hello Guys,
I need to know if it is possible to deploy WSA to serve internal users without changing their IPs?
If yes, how to do it?
Thanks.

We would need to know a little more information to really help you on this, however if you have ASA you can do this with WCCP. 
This link might help:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/web-security-appliance/117810-configure-wsa-00.html
-MB

Similar Messages

  • Is it possible to copy and paste a formula without changing the cell references?

    I am trying to paste a formula to a cell adjacent to where it currently is but when I do, the cell references in it change. I am trying to get exactly the same formula in the cell (without re-typing it).

    dedwards96 wrote:
    Just another quick question, is it possible to make a large number of cell references 'absolute'?
    Individual cell references in formulas may have four distinct states: relative, absolute column, absolute row, or absolute column and row. These are set using the popup menu on the reference itself. Click on the reference in the formula and choose one of the four states from the popup menu.
    Once set, you can fill the formula into the rest of a column or row using the Fill Handle (small circle at the lower right of a selected cell). Cell references in the new copies of the formula will remain absolute or adjst to their new position dependent on the setting for each reference. You can also copy and paste the cell (single click to select it, command-C to copy) with the same results.
    You can also copy/paste without changing the formula's cell references if you select the formula (Drag across the formula in the entry bar, copy, press tab to deselect and reconfirm the formula in the original cell) rather than the cell. Pasted into a new cell, the formula will appear as if you typed it in exactly as it was in the original cell—neither absolute references nor relative references will have changed.
    Regards,
    Barry

  • Is it possible to import CDs in the background without changing focus

    Hello,
    I'm trying to import my CD collection into iTunes (9.0.3).
    I've setup preferences so that when I insert a CD it will automatically import and eject.
    At the same time I'm trying to watch an hour long video in itunes U.
    Is there any way to stop iTunes from stopping the video and switching to the imported CD everytime I insert a CD?
    Sorry if this is a repost.

    Hi Brandon,
    Thank you for your answer, I will try this then .
    Kind regards,
    Carl-Marius

  • Why do you keep alienating your user base with worthless UI changes?

    If it weren't for some add-ons that I've come to depend upon which are not supported in Chrome, I'd have switched long ago. But version 29 is the last straw. If I can't get version 28 re-installed and working again, I'm quitting FireFox for good.
    You claim that FireFox is so damned customizeable that it's easy to revert to the v. 28 UI, but that's simply not true. First of all, it requires an add-on which breaks other functionality. Second, that add-on doesn't restore everything. And Third, there were about:config setting that did fix some of these things (e.g. browser.tabs.onTop) but you've broken/removed those settings in v. 29.
    Why not simply make all of these things configurable in about:config, like browser.tabs.onTop? What's the point of forcing us to use an add-on, where we're dependent on a third-party developer who clearly didn't get it quite right because he's broken other things? Indeed, the support page even says that the only way to get TabMixPlus to work is to revert to the stupid curved tabs - I can't have square tabs and TabMixPlus, so right there it's impossible for this add-on to restore everything the way it was.
    You've broken FireFox for the last time, and as I said if I can't get v. 28 back I'm quitting you for good. I've already abandoned you on Android because you can't seem to make that work - it crashes all the time on both my phone and my tablet - and you're ruining what once was the premier browser.
    So, again, my question is: Why do you idiots keep alienating your user base with worthless UI changes? I believe that you developers are making changes for change sake, and you're so close to them you think everyone will think your crap UI "improvements" smells like roses. Well, they don't - they stink. If FireFox is so damned customizable, and you think your ideas are so fantastic, why not show people how to configure FireFox the way you prefer, rather than force the changes on everyone and tell us who don't like it to figure out how to put it back on our own. And if FF 28 wasn't flexible enough to get the look and feel you prefer with simple settings changes then you should have worked on making those changes possible, not worked on hard-coding them so nobody can change them.
    More importantly, perhaps you should concentrate on fixing bugs, instead. You should not have released v.2 until you'd addressed all bugs from v.1. BugZilla documents a history of bugs carrying over year after year. That is unprofessional. You still have memory leaks after all these years, forcing me to re-start FireFox on a regular basis - that is simply irresponsible. Yes, you've addressed them. Yes, you've made things better by not loading pages after a re-start until we click on that tab. But those are bandaids - you haven't fixed the actual memory leaks! To claim we must accept your willy-nilly UI changes to get security enhancements is ludicrous in the face of these memory leaks.
    ''Title was edited by a moderator due to language. See the [http://support.mozilla.com/kb/Forum+and+chat+rules+and+guidelines Rules & Guidelines] .''

    If you're on a 64bit OS I highly recommend waterfox. If not you can have a look at cyberfox and palemoon. All of those are built on firefox but are ignoring the terrible gui changes.
    Good luck and let me know how you get on.

  • In BD87  T /c  is it possible to control user based in Comp code...?

    In BD87  T /c  is it possible to control user based in Comp code...?
    Thanks
    Mahi

    BD87 is a transaction to work with IDOCs.
    one IDOC e.g. for vendor master can have several segments with different company codes.
    But you cannot post an IDOC only partially, that is technically not possible and does not make much sense.
    Further the IDOC segment in the table is just one huge field, It does not have single fields like company code.It is a generic field that can keep the segments of any IDOC.
    In my opinion there is no way to control it at company code level.
    In any case you posted it in the wrong forum. BD87 is not a MM transaction.
    Hence, moving it to the Abap Connectivity forum

  • Is it possible to keep the reference of VO Instance in AM session UserData

    Hi,
    I am using JDeveloper 11.1.2.0.0.
    Is it possible to keep the reference of ViewObject Instance in the Application Module Session User Data? Will it have any side effect and is it best practice?
    Instead of find the View Object every time form the Application Module, directly access the instance of viewobject stored in the user data and proceed further for our business logic implementations.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Perumal S

    Its not recommended(and it may fail in real life scenario). You may run in to issues when AM is getting passivated. VO has set of supporting components and most of them are not Serialize. Assuming you deal with data from third party data source and your VO is programmatic VO, a possibility could be caching the data used for populating VO through some cluster aware caching mechanisms instead of caching VO instance. Alternatively, if the number of rows are less, use transient VO
    Edited by: Jobinesh on Nov 15, 2011 10:23 AM

  • Is it possible to prevent users from viewing a page in Edit Mode?

    Hello everyone,
    I would like to know if it is possible to prevent users from accessing a portal page in Edit Mode. Currently, the users do not have access to any links that take them to edit mode, but if they add &_mode=16 to the end, they view the page in edit mode. Granted, they don't have permissions to add or edit content, but I would like to keep them from seeing this.
    I am using 9.0.4.1
    Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
    Jim

    hi jim,
    you cannot really configure this in portal. if somebody manually appends &_mode=16 we display the default edit mode, but fully enforce security. this means that the user cannot see anything he is not allowed to see: like pending items, hidden, expired or deleted items. as you said he also cannot add, edit or delete any items.
    regards,
    christian

  • I am using a Photoshop cs2, and I wonder if it is possible to keep the settings of the guidelines when closing an image, with the actual document ? It would be nice to have the guidelines locked down, I find it than when opening the same or another image,

    I am using a Photoshop cs2, and I wonder if it is possible to keep the settings of the guidelines when closing an image, with the actual document ? It would be nice to have the guidelines locked down, I find it than when opening the same or another image, the guidelines are not locked, it is annoying to have to lock them down again. and it would actually be nice, to ba able to give specific directions when placing the guidelines. Thanks

    Then why are the guides unlocked when I reopen a document that I saved with the guides locked ?
    Thanks.

  • Is it possible for multiple users to use a "generic" account simultaneously without screen sharing?

    Hey and thanks for checking out the thread.
    I am wondering if it is possible to have users use a generic account at the same time without any sort of screen sharing.
    I have set up a generic user account (for example useraccount, password 1234) for users to use in the time before I can set up a custom user name for them. However, I have run into some issues with this.
    When multiple users log on using this generic account, their applications seem to be shared on each screen. In the room with multiple Mac workstations, if someone starts working on Photoshop, Photoshop will open on every one elses screen who is logged on under that generic account.
    Is it possible for users to log on using a generic network account and have their own isolated work environment or is this sort of sharing a feature? I am new to Mac servers and am not sure.
    Thanks for reading the thread.

    That shared-account approach seems impractical for the various reasons you've identified, as well as the inevitable issue of cleaning up the detritus that'll inevitably build up in a shared account, and for the lack of accountability for activities occuring under the shared account for both auditing and security, and sharing directories would tend to introduce obscure conflicts around which-file-version-wins file updates when the same file is used in several places, and would probably be contrary to any per-user application software licensing agreements that might be involved.
    Put another way, get unique accounts created for folks, and work toward the ability to create accounts for arriving folks, and — if it's applicable here — talk to management about getting any per-user software licensing issues sorted out, whether that's having spare copies purchased and ahead or some advanced notice on accounts, or establishing group software licensing where that's available.
    AFAIK, there are tools around which can automate account creation, too.  Either generic, a tool such as Passenger, or it's certainly feasible to script the account creation sequence.
    Trying this shared-access generic-account approach just looks like it can create more work and more hassles and more effort to me...

  • Is it possible to keep an email account on the iPhone but stop if from checking for new mail?

    I have an email account that has been deleted from the provider (Gmail), but I want to keep the old mails on my phone, while stopping it from checking for new mail.  Is this possible? 
    If I disable the account to stop if from checking for new mail (and producing a bunch of annoying pop-ups every time the mail app is opened), the account becomes invisible and the old mails disappear.  I want to keep them visible to I can read and refer to them, but want to stop the phone from trying to download new ones or check the account.
    Any help appreciated. 

    Thanks for the thought.  In this case, that doesn't really help much, as it requires a bunch of button pushing just to check emails.  Plus, if I'm not mistaken, in addition to switching modes every time I check email, it also prevents the other accounts from downloading the most recent mails as well.  Since it's possible to keep an account on a Mac computer, but take it offline, it's very disappointing if there isn't a way to do the equivalent on an iPhone so that it passively holds the mails but doesn't send constant pop-ups every time the app is accessed.

  • Is it possible to keep the "Email me when someone replies" checkbox AFTER you make a posting?

    I'm not sure if I'm the only who does this, but sometimes I forget to check off this box before submitting a new post (i.e, starting a new message thread). Currently, this feature disappears after you submit a new message thread. It is real useful feature to have, and without it, makes your posting experience a lot less desirable.
    Is it technically possible to keep the check-off box available at all times during a posted thread?

    Hi SteveCT99,
    It is possible to automatically subscribe to topics you participate in:
    At the top of the page, click on the "My Settings" link, located after the "Sign Out" link by your name in the grey box.
    Click on the "Subscriptions and Bookmarks" tab
    Check box after "Notify me for my own posts and replies"
     - and/or - 
    Check box after "Automatically subscribe me to topics I participate in" to add the topics to your subscription list.
    Scroll down and Save changes
    You should now automatically get notices each time a new reply is added to the topic.
    Please let me know if this helps.  
    Thanks,
    SunshineF
    Clicking the "Kudos star" to the left is a great way to say thanks!
    When your problem has been solved, accept the solution by clicking the "Accept as Solution" button to help other members in the future!
    Rules of Participation

  • How Front End pool deals with fail over to keep user state?

         Hello to all, I searched a lot of articles to understand how Lync 2010 keeps user state if a fail happens in a Front Pool node, but didn't find anything clear.
         I found a MS info. about ths topic : " The Front End Servers maintain transient information—such as logged-on state and control information for an IM, Web, or audio/video (A/V) conference—only for the duration of a user’s session.
    This configuration
    is an advantage because in the event of a Front End Server failure, the clients connected to that server can quickly reconnect to another Front End Server that belongs to the same Front End pool. "
        As I read, the client uses DNS to reconnect to another Front End in the pool. When it reconnects to an available server, does he lose what he/she was doing at Lync client? Can the server that is now hosting his section recover all
    "user's session data"? Is positive, how?
       Regards, EEOC.

    The presence information and other dynamic user data is stored in the RTCDYN database on the backend SQL database in a 2010 pool:
    http://blog.insidelync.com/2011/04/the-lync-server-databases/  If you fail over to another pool member, this pool member has access to the same data.
    Ongoing conversations and the like are cached at the workstation.
    Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question please click "Mark As Answer".
    SWC Unified Communications

  • Is it possible to create user defined control in labview

    in .net we can create user defined contol in which i can put more then one control and,, can use it as single control when needed,, but,, how this possible in labview,,
    actually in my program i have a tab control and,, in that tab control there are 8 pages,, now there are 5 different kind option selection for each page lets say "a" "b" "c" "d" "e",,,,,.,. so,, when i select "a" configuration for tabpage 1 should show.. "a"(control collection)  on tabpage1....and,, same should b possible for all 8 pages............................. this can possible if its possible to create user defined contorl in labview
    while in .net its very easy task i m confused here,..,.
    i put these controls in another 5 different  VI,,,, and tried to call in subpanel but,, i dont find the solution,,,
    Attachments:
    tabcontrol.vi ‏1 KB

    Hi,
    I've tried to open you attachment but LabVIEW tells me it's not a vi... could you check it and repost please ?
    I'm not really sure of what you need but you CAN customize you control in LabVIEW, it is not hard, you just have to know how it works
    Sometimes being good at another programation language confuse you more than it helps because you try to do as you are used to... the difficulty it to "translate" functions from a language to another.
    I do know how frustrating it can be when you think "Damned, it would take me only 5 minutes to do that with language a and after 10 hours with language b it is still not working "
    You have to get in LabVIEW way of thinking, I wish you good luck !
    A quick exemple... this might not do exactly what you need but it may help you anyway.
    When my feet touch the ground each morning the devil thinks "bloody hell... He's up again!"
    Attachments:
    exemple.vi ‏55 KB

  • Mac: With my user profile, it is not possible for me to announce me to the Creative Cloud, with a different user profile, it goes without problems.

    With my user profile, it is not possible for me to announce me to the Creative Cloud, with a different user profile, it goes without problems. Creative Cloud Desktop has been uninstalled and reinstalled. There is no error message.

    john beardsworth wrote:
    John Waller wrote:
    However, Adobe will soon introduce Cloud only features into Lightroom CC for which LR6 (perpetual license) owners will have to wait until LR7 (paid upgrade).
    That is possible, John, but it is only speculation on your part. Might, not will.
    kwdaves wrote:
    There is a "Lightroom 6" upgrade available for US $79 if you have a valid license for any of the earlier versions. From what I can tell, the only difference between Lightroom 6 Full, Lightroom 6 Upgrade and LightroomCC is in the license. The download file is the same.
    Other differences - with CC you get LrMobile/LrWeb and they throw in a free copy of Photoshop too.
    Yes, but when I bought my standalone license and clicked on the "Download" button it took me to the LightroomCC page. The downloaded file is named Lightroom 6, but in the CC app the installed program is LightroomCC (2015).

  • Drop Box - possible for  other user to monitor progress?

    Is it possible, for the user whose Drop Box I am tranferring files to, to monitor the progress so they can tell when an upload is complete to their Mac?
    I get the progress window on my end, but they have no idea what is going on on their end.

    Pretty difficult, iirc the Filesize required is reserved at the start, so Get Info wouldn't help.
    Perhaps they could use Activity Monitor to observe the Network IN activity?
    Most likely someway to monitor it with a Script, but beyond me at the moment... Maybe Sharepoints with AFP Monitor!
    http://www.hornware.com/sharepoints/

Maybe you are looking for