Is it Possible to Make an Object Dissappear in a Shot?

Hey Everyone...
I am finishing a short film and happened to notice one minor issue. In one of my master shots, I can see a light that should not be in the shot. Unfortunately, it cannot be wire framed out.
I know this is a crazy question, but is there any possible way to somehow color out the object and replace it with what's behind it (a white wall). It's a very minor issue that most likely I will only notice, but it is enough to drive me crazy and on the big screen, I'm afraid it could be an issue, etc.
This will be an easy shot to reshoot, but if there is a way I can fix it in post (and learn something new)..I am all for it.

but I am wondering if it is possible to keep the actors head in front of the object, if this is too much of a pain, then I am going to just reshoot this one shot. < </div>
Piece of cake if you understand rotoscoping. A monstrous disaster if you don't have the patience, skills, or tolerance for the imperfect result of rotoscoping without the services of a professional rotoscoper.
This is added to your OP and both posts carry the same "might as well reshoot" implication.
Yes. Reshoot it.
bogiesan

Similar Messages

  • Is it possible to make an object to always face the camera (in 3d)?

    I have an animation with a camera flying through a map in 3D.
    Is it possible to make all my texts layers automatically "face" the camera, no matter what movement the camera makes in 3d?
    Thanks in advance,
    Morimitsu Yamauchi

    Sure, just use the Basic Motion > Point At behavior and make the camera the target. You'll need to tweak the settings a bit.

  • Is it possible to make an object/colour that will not print but still be visible on screen once saved as a PDF?

    I want to show stuff in a PDF that will automatically not 'print' from Illustrator.
    For example create a colour to make shapes and text that you can read from the saved PDF but will not print once the PDF is printed out
    Thanks

    from illustrator you could put stuff on a template layer (check 'Template' in layer options), but then it would only be visible on the illustrator side; opened in Acrobat the layer would be invisible.
    you could do it from Acrobat Pro though. have 'Create Acrobat layers from top-level layers' checked in the PDF save options, then open in Acrobat and look in the layer properties (this is from Acrobat Pro 9):

  • Is possible to make Serializable a Connection object?

    Hi I would like to know if is possible to make Serializable a Connection Object, I would like to save the Connection object into a text file so other class can read it and execute a proper query. If is possible how can I do it?.
    Thanks.

    Actually, if a class isn't already Serializable, you can't make it become Serializable reliably. Consider the following case:
    class A
        int x = 0;
        public void setX(int new_x) { x = new_x; }
        public int getX() { return x; }
    class B extends A implements Serializable
        int y = 0;
        public void setY(int new_y) { y = new_y; }
        public int getY() { return y; }
    public static void main(String arg[]) throws Exception
        B b = new B();
        b.setX(10);
        b.setY(12);
        someObjectOutputStream.writeObject(b);
    }The problem with this is that the implementation of Serializable by class B does not affect class A. In the above example, the ObjectInputStream that obtains the instance of B will have a y value of 12, but an x value of 0 (not 10).
    Thus, unless the Connection object implemented Serializable to begin with, it can't become Serializable. And, as the above post has described, the implementers of the Connection object would not make it Serializable as the local Connection object uses underlying O/S resources which cannot simply be transformed into a byte array.

  • How to make the objects got even distance in the Blend?

    Wondering anyone has the same experience or not? I blend 2 circles together and adjust the spine from a straight line to wave curve line by adding points and adjusting the handles of the points. The space between the objects along the spine turn to uneven after that. I tried to use the "specified distance" in the option and add more points and modify the handles again. However, all in vain. Finally, I need to expand the blend and adjust the distance of those objects manually. Any suggestions to correct the stupid way? Thanks.

    There is not really any way to get even spacing in a blend when the spine path has uneven curvature. (What the Specify Distance option does is take the length of the path, and divide it by the requested distance to determine the number of blend steps, but then once it has that number, they get spread out by exactly the same algorithm that is used when the number of steps is specified by a fixed number or calculated from the color difference.)
    The length of the direction handles on a spine path affects the placement of objects, with longer direction handles pushing the blend steps away from the anchor point, and shorter direction handles pulling them in towards it. This tends to make the objects more tightly spaced when the path has sharp curves, and more loosely spaced where it is flatter.
    If the direction handles are of equal length, and the distance between the two direction points is the same as their length, such as occurs on a circle, then the "pulls" balance out and the spacing ends up even. But when the curvature varies, so does the spacing.
    This can be used to advantage to get non-linear gradations, by making a straight line and then pulling out direction handles that lie along the line. It can also be used to make objects on an elliptical orbit appear to be spaced in perspective, since they are closer together at the sharp ends of the ellipse and farther apart at the flat sides.
    Often, however, what is desired is spacing that is independent of the curvature, such as you get with scatter brushes.
    It was fully intended when live blends were implemented in AI 8 that even spacing would be an option, and would indeed be the default option, with logarithmic spacing and direction-handle controlled spacing being two other choices. The direction-handle controlled spacing was just implemented first not because it was most useful (it isn't) but because, believe it or not, it is
    easiest. (Points on the interior of a bezier curve are natively addressed by t-value, which is a fraction of the direction handle distance. To obtain a position that is a fraction of the path length, one must first flatten the entire path into a polygonal approximation, then find the position by adding up the lengths of the flat segments. In contrast, one can obtain a point at a given fraction of the bezier t-value without flattening the path. This is the reason, by the way, that while scatter brushes have more even spacing between objects, they do not fit as tightly to the bezier as blend steps do - they are being placed on a straight line approximation of the path instead of directly on it.) The intention was to get the easy case of t-value based spacing working, and then add the harder case that requires flattening.
    It turned out that we did not have time to add the extra options for AI 8, so it shipped as is. Then Macromedia sued us over live blends because Freehand had them first and as part of the settlement we had to promise to stop enhancing them. Now that the two companies have merged, that issue is moot, so enhancing blends is now a possibility for future versions of Illustrator. (All of you who complain about the cool features that Freehand has had for years and Illustrator hasn't, as if it were perverse and intransigent of Adobe not to follow suit, might want to keep in mind that copying the features of another company's software is often not allowed.)
    In the meantime, scatter brushes can be a good alternative if all your blend steps are the same, but obviously they won't work if your blended shapes are changing along the path.

  • Possible to make line corner not jagged, but not round?

    If you look at the attached image, you can the upper line is very jagged.  Is it possible to retain the object's shape but make that point, less pointy?

    There are three black partial segments in your screenshot. I will refer to them as the Upper Segment, Middle Segment, and Lower Segment.
    The unwanted outboard point is due to the mitering of the accute corner formed by the Upper Segment and Middle Segment, which are part of the same path. You can correct this by instead making the Upper Segment and Lower Segment parts of a single path, and let the Middle Segment be a separate path.
    Depending on the rest of the paths, which are beyond view, this may or may not require treating the Strokes as separte paths from the Fillls.
    JET

  • Is it possible to use 3D objects in Flash CS4 for animation?

    Hi,
    Is it possible to use 3D objects created in 3D Max, Blendor, iClone etc. to perform animation to make Flash Movie more realistic? Can I make nice animations like in iClone 4 Software?
    If it is possible to use 3D Objects in Flash, please provide a sample Tutorial Link if you have any.
    Thanks in advance.

    Here are some links to 3d tutorils which u might find useful
    http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flash/3d_animation.html
    http://www.adobe.com/designcenter/flash/articles/lrvid4059_fl.html
    http://www.flashandmath.com/flashcs4/
    http://www.kirupa.com/developer/flashcs4/intro_3d_flashcs4_pg1.htm

  • How to make an object mutable?

    Can any one tell me how to make an object mutable?
    Following is Class X & Y?
    class Y
    public static void main(String arg[]) {
    X a1=new X();
    Object a=a1.get();
    System.out.println(a.toString());
    a1.set(a);
    System.out.println(a.toString());
    class X implements Serializable
    public Object get(){
    return new Object();
    public synchronized void set(Object o)
    o=null;
    In my class Y when i say
    a1.set(a);
    I want local Object a of main method should be nullified.
    Can it be possible if yes what is the way or code to be applied so that
    my next a.toString() statement will give me NullpointerException.

    Isn't it more accurate to say that object references are passed by value?
    OP -- Basically you can't to what you want to do. When you "pass an object" as a method parameter, what you're really passing is a copy of the reference that points to the object. You now have two refs pointing to the same object--one in the caller and one in the method being executed. Setting either of those refs to null does NOT affect the object itself, and does NOT affect the other ref. It just means that the ref that's been set to null no longer points to any object.
    If you want the called method to make a change that the caller can see, you need to either 1) return a value from the method, 2) encapsulate the object to be changed as a member of new class, or 3) pass the object to be changed as the single element of an array. I would STRONGLY recommend against (3) as a way to simulate pass by reference. Better to examine your design and determine whether (1) or (2) more closely matches what you're really trying to accomplish.

  • Is it possible to make connection for the VC application the SQL Server

    hi
    I have requirement like, We have some data available in SQL server as central repositoty. My client want to make the Anylatics application like showing graphs in VC based on the data available in SQL server.
    My question. Is there any possiblity to make the connection the sql server by creating some system object using some JDBC connection Like that.
    What is the possibility.
    can u any body tell what is the work around need to be for this requirement. Whether it is possible or not.
    Regards
    vijay

    Hi Vijay,
    In your other thread, I have given the link to the following doc which will help you to in configuring the JDBC Connector.
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/uuid/b00917dc-ead4-2910-3ebb-b0a63e49ef10
    That was the first step.
    In the second step, you need to create a JDBC System in the portal. Go through the following doc which explains how to create BI JDBC system for VC. All you need to change is that on Page 10, choose JDBC system instead of BI JDBC system, and do the necessary configurations.
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/6209b52e-0401-0010-6a9f-d40ec3a09424
    As rightly said by Marcel, you can use stored procedures as well as SQL statements. As far as stored procedures are concerned, all you need to do is go to Enterprise Manager, and create procedures in your database in the same way by which you create new tables and users (Refer my article). Then you can use these procedures in your Visual Composer provided you have properly created the JDBC system in portal properly.
    Also have a look at the following doc:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/6339e7d4-0a01-0010-1c98-db00e52e989a
    Bye
    Ankur
    Do reward points for helpful as well as solved answers!!

  • How to make an object of inner class and use it ?

    Hi tecs,
    In my JSF application i have a need to make an inner member class in one of my bean class.
    How can i make the object of this class?(what should be the entry in faces-config)
    And there are text box and check box (in the JSP) associated with the elements of this inner class. What should be the coding in JSP so that elements in the JSP can be linked with the corresponding members of the inner class ?
    Plz help.
    Thnx in advance.

    Hi
    I am havin 10 text boxes in my application.
    But out of 10 , 3 will be always together(existence of one is not possible without the other two.)
    Now i want to create a vector of objects ( here object will consist of the value corresponding to these three boxes),there can be many elements in this vector.
    So i m thinking to make an inner class which have three String variables corresponding to these text boxes that exists together.
    What can b done ?

  • Is it possible to make a code editor in Java?

    I'm new to java and so i'd like to know if it would be possible to make a simple code editor for Mobile Phones with Java.
    The code editor will be for GML.
    I'd like to make it so that the code can be easily edited on a wide range Mobile phones (not necissarily smart phones).
    If this is possible, I would greatly appreaciate any help or advice. Thanks.
    skinnyeddy

    TuringPest wrote:
    Hippolyte wrote:
    skinnyeddy wrote:
    "first list the areas in which you are proficient" - I'm not. I thought it would be easy to make a simple text/code editor in java without any experience. That was a bit of a mistake. Looks like I'll have to learn the hard way :SIMHO, one should woodshed it, work on programming basics and object-oriented programming fundamentals, in Java for at least one year before attempting to write any GUI code. Even day in this forum we see what code looks like when this advice is not followed.my first java code 5 years ago was an applet with a changing 2d function being animated.
    it worked after 2 grueling days and i was so happy because visual feedback was my only motivation.
    so its hard to say. granted, my code was awful for a long time.I'm thinking of the guy last week who had Swing+JDBC code and kept pestering for help on an obvious syntax error (he was invoking a method with no arguments when it was defined to take a String array) and for the life of him, he couldn't see the error or understand the error message. Posters kept telling him to learn the fundamentals first, but he was stubborn and kept demanding someone fix his syntax error...

  • Is it possible to make a fixed size page in muse, so it doesn't resize?

    I want to make a fixed size page (pic1),
    but there always an extra space on the bottom… pic2

    Thank you for reply - I will check it out…
    Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 09:07:46 -0800
    From: [email protected]
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: Is it possible to make a fixed size page in muse, so it doesn't resize?
        Re: Is it possible to make a fixed size page in muse, so it doesn't resize?
        created by Zak Williamson (Adobe) in Help with using Adobe Muse CC - View the full discussion
    Assuming the screenshots are of the same page, the one that's taller is either taller because the minimum page height has been changed or due to some page content (that's not marked as a Footer Item) being located in the new space. This may be an empty text frame or the transparent area of a widget, text frame or other object.
         Please note that the Adobe Forums do not accept email attachments. If you want to embed a screen image in your message please visit the thread in the forum to embed the image at http://forums.adobe.com/message/5941664#5941664
         Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page: http://forums.adobe.com/message/5941664#5941664
         To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at http://forums.adobe.com/message/5941664#5941664. In the Actions box on the right, click the Stop Email Notifications link.
               Start a new discussion in Help with using Adobe Muse CC at Adobe Community
      For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to http://forums.adobe.com/thread/416458?tstart=0.

  • The requested transformation would make some objects too large.

    Please help.
    I load a PNG in Illustrator. However when it loads it doesn't load right. It loads HUGE. When I try and move it, it says:
    "Can't move the objects.The requested transformation would make some objects too large."
    I am pulling my hair out here. Why the hell can't Illustrator just open a bloody PNG and allow me to edit it?!
    Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks.

    I see, Christopher.
    It seems that something is seriously wrong.
    You may try the following (you may have tried/done some of them already) and see whether it helps (the following is a general list of things you may try when the issue is not in a specific file; 3) and 4) are specifically aimed at possibly corrupt preferences):
    1) Close down Illy and open again;
    2) Restart the computer (you may do that up to 3 times);
    3) Close down Illy and press Ctrl+Alt+Shift/Cmd+Option+Shift during startup (easy but irreversible);
    4) Move the folder http://www.bugge.com/Family-and-friends/Illy/illy.html (follow the link with that name) with Illy closed (more tedious but also more thorough and reversible);
    5) Look through and try out the relevant among the Other options (follow the link with that name, Item 7) is a list of usual suspects among other applications that may disturb and confuse Illy, Item 15) applies to CC, CS6, and maybe CS5);
    Even more seriously, you may:
    6) Uninstall, run the Cleaner Tool (if you have CS3/CS4/CS5/CS6/CC), and reinstall.
    http://www.adobe.com/support/contact/cscleanertool.html

  • Can't scale the objects. The requested transformation would make some objects too small to use.

    How does one remedy this Adobe error message? "Can't scale the objects. The requested transformation would make some objects too small to use." This one always gets me. I'll spend more time trying to find the object in question. This has happened in almost al versions, but this time it's CS5.

    Hmm, possible solution would be to select your object(s), scale them to 90%, and then hit Cmd+D or Control+D to repeat the transformation. I read that sometimes if you scale down too much and too fast it can cause this message.
    Hope this works for you!
    Michael

  • Is it possible to make a reflection of an image that will change with the image? [was: Reflection]

    Is it possible to make a reflection of an image that will change with the image?

    normfb wrote:
    I believe that a Smart Object will solve your problem.
    place your original image in a new file as a smart object and do the same for the reflection (made by Transforming, reducing the opacity and introducing a mild horizontal motion blur) on its own layer, then:
    by double clicking on the smart object in the layers panel and returning to the original image, any change you make in the original and save, will automatically update the upright image and its reflection.
    Nice one Norm.  Five Kudos points to you.

Maybe you are looking for