Is it possible to order ONLY a new dust jacket for Aperture Book?

I made a typo error on dust jacket only , so i would like to order only that .
Re -print dust jacket with error corrected .

The mininum number of pages in an order is 20 pages.
I'd use the "Report a problem" link on the email receipt to contact the Print Products Store and ask for help.
See: How to report an issue with your iTunes Store, App Store, Mac App Store, or iBookstore purchase

Similar Messages

Which New MacBook Pro for Aperture...?

I'm need to get another Mac laptop and would like to get one of the new 15" MacBook Pro models. It seems like the entry-level model is the sweet spot this time. I would have to pay $500 more to get more VRAM and 50GB more disk space and a slightly faster processor. For Aperture it's all about the graphics card and both of the 15" models have the same card except the cheaper one has 256mb VRAM and the other has 512.
Would I notice the difference (with Aperture) between 256 and 512 on the VRAM? I think this is the deciding factor.
Thanks,
Robert

I'm not so sure about the need for 512 MB as opposed to 256. I'm running Aperture on a two year old iMac with 128 MB of GPU RAM and it works just fine. A 512 MB card is not inherently faster than a 256 card; in fact, unless those extra 256 MB are used, they are just as fast.
On the other hand you will most certainly benefit from the larger L2 cache. There is no question that the 2.5 model is a faster computer when running Aperture but I personally think that the $500 price difference between the 2.4 and 2.5 model is just a little too much. I will probably order the cheaper model and save that $500 towards a D300 instead!
/Martin

Will new camera updates for Aperture only come to OS X 10.5 users?

I was trying to understand how new camera RAW definitions were added to Aperture. It sounds like its actually through updates to the OS (so everything can understand the files...which sounds good on the face of it).
But if that's the case, does that mean that an Aperture on Tiger installation (10.4.x) won't be getting the future camera RAW updates?
Is that right?
Scott

I think your right. The initial size of the update (beta) was 480MB, which is truly gargantuan for an OS update....they're definately tweeking alot of things.
Apple decided to break the graphics drivers out of the update at some point and that (along with some other stuff) helped bring the size down to 350MB, but that's still really big.
I think, as long as 10.4 doesn't give me problems (like not getting camera defs), I'll wait till summer and let OS X 10.5 stabilize some more.

Best way to transfer everything on new hard drive for mac book pro

Hi have a mid-2009 macbook pro with 4 GB ram and 250 GB hard drive, which is full now. I just bought 8 GB RAM to speed it up and a new 1 TB hard drive. I am running latest Lion (that I downloaded from mac app store - I have the original install DVD for Snow leopard). What would be the best and cleanest way to transfer everything (OSX, applications, data, files, user preferences, passwords, etc from the old hard drive to the new one)^
1- I heard I can hook the new hard drive via USB and do a clean install of my Snow leopard DVD, then update to Lion via mac app store. Then how do I transfer everything else?
2- I also heard about carbon copy cloner, but somewhere it says there is a file in Lion that this will not copy.
Anybody have any helpfull answers?
thanks
Naniners

My suggestion would be to use Migration Assistant. This program you have in your Utilities folder and once you hook up your old Hard Drive to the new computer via USB or Target Disk mode, it will pretty much direct you on how to do the whole process. If you have any other questions, let me know.
Migration Assistant steps for 10.6xxx
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4413
Migration Assistant steps for 10.7xxx
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4889
I've done this many times and it works very well.

How to change credit card info for Aperture book I ordered

Hello Forum:
I need to change the credit card number that I used to order my photobooks.
How do I change that info?
Thanks,
Steve

If it is within 90 minutes of ordering, cancel the order, make the correction and reorder - other wise there is no way
http://www.apple.com/support/photoservices/cancel/
LN

New 15" MBP for Aperture & Adobe - I5 or I7

Hi.
I have an older MBP with a blown screen (note to self- laptop screens and lemonade don't mix well). I use it for basic applications like Mail, Safari, MS Office. I'm also starting to use it for photos using PS CS3 and Aperture. Can anyone tell me what the 15" I7 will do for me over the I5 (or for that matter if there are any negatives vs the I5). I know that the I5 or I7 are both overkill for the basic stuff. I'm most concerned about what type of benefit I'll see in adobe, which is painfully slow on my current mac.
Also, is there any benefit to upgrading to the 7200 rpm hard drive over the stock 5400 rpm hd?
Thanks
Ken

Hi Ken,
The i7 will definitely be faster, especially for graphically intensive applications like Photoshop because the chip can temporarily overclock itself when needed. The only downside I can think of for the i7 is that it costs more money. However, in some cases, the graphics card is more important than the CPU. If you're using CS4 or planning to upgrade to CS5, you will definitely want a computer with the beefiest graphics card you can get as Photoshop CS4 and above can use OpenGl, thus taking the load off the CPU. But for most people, I feel that the i5 should suffice. I'm still running a 1.5 year old 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo chip and my computer is still zippy when it comes to Photoshop, Final Cut, or anything else for that matter.
As for the HDD, If you're doing a lot of Photoshop work, definitely go for the 7200rpm drive. I just upgraded my laptop to a 7200rpm drive, and I can tell you that my computer is definitely faster. That's not only doing intense graphics work, but also in everyday tasks like booting up.
Hope this helps.

Aperture book page order help

I have created a wedding book (80 pages) in Aperture. The pages are in perfect order in Aperture BUT when I preview the book something is throwing the pages off by 1... I don't know how to remedy need help!

How do you Preview your book? With print tp pdf, or using the preview, that is available when you order the book? Like described here? http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1040 That preview should be exactly what you get, when you order the book.
Open Aperture.
Click the Buy Book button.
Click the Preview Book button. Aperture will begin assembling the book. This may take several minutes depending on the size of your book.
When the assembly is complete a PDF of your book will open.
Note: With Aperture 3, the first page of the PDF is the wrap-around dust jacket for your book, and the second page is the photo wrap cover that will be wrapped around the casing of your hardcover book.

Need a dust jacket only....

Is it possible to order just the paper cover / dust jacket for a previously printed large hardcover ibook?

Lynn:
Definitely suggest that option to iPhoto via http://www.apple.com/feedback/iphoto.html.
An alternative might be the following:
1 - while in the book mode Control-click on the gray area next to a page and select Preview in the contextual menu.
2 - after the book has been rendered and you're looking at the preview do a Save As PDF.
3 - in the PDF file the first page will be the dust jacket as seen here. I'm sure you can find a printer like Kinko's to print that one page to glossy stock suitable for the dust jacket. If I'm not mistaken the size is 32.67 x 8.78 inches.
TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto (iPhoto.Library for iPhoto 5 and earlier) database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
I've created an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger or later), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. It's compatible with iPhoto 6 and 7 libraries and Tiger and Leopard. iPhoto does not have to be closed to run the application, just idle. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.

HT204364 how do i just order prints? i see options for ordering cards, books, etc. on my computer but not just prints

HOw do I order prints? I see options for cards, books, calendars and slideshows on my computer but not prints?

What version of iPhoto are you using? For iPhoto 9 click on the Share button at the bottom right of the iPhoto window and select Order Prints from the options presented:
Note: I recommend that you crop the photos to the print size you want before ordering so that you can determine what part of the photos gets cropped out rather than let the photofinisher's software do the cropping.
OT

"Posting with reference to pur. order only possible for integrated whse"

When I try posting GR with mvmt type 101 wrt PO I am receiving the error “Posting with reference to pur. order only possible for integrated whse”
The scenario is storage lcation is maintained with the external warehouse management .
Is there anything i need to maintain warehouse as decentralised one or should i need to maintain any moment types or is there anything else i should maintain in the customisation.
Kindly guide me regarding this as I am new to WM ,Thanks in advance.

Hi ,
In my case i have not maintained as decentralised one.
also the thing is there is no warehouse house data managed over here .the requirement is when connected to extended warehouse the system has to create inspection lot after the GR has done ,
whereas in normal scenario everything is normal,
can you please suggest what should be done in this case.
Also if possible can you please tell me what from the scratch so that it will be helpful to come through .

Serialized purchase orders processable in new transaction only

Hello All,
I have a program which uses BAPI_PO_RELEASE to release the blocked POs.
A job has been scheduled to execute this program.
In the job log, I get the following
Date       Time     Message text                                                                             Message class Message no. Message type
09.02.2011 01:03:59 Release effected with release code Z2                                                         ME           106          S
09.02.2011 01:03:59 Serialized purchase orders processable in new transaction only                 MEPO          130          S
09.02.2011 01:03:59 NB-Standard PO 4501932233 changed                                                          06           023          S
Though it mentions that the release is affected, the particular PO still remains blocked.
Also there is a success message, "Serialized purchase orders processable in new transaction only", can anyone help understand this message?
Regards,
Smita

Hi Xavier ,
Purchase orders :
Open and Completed only -- All PO in EKKO Table
Open Only -- Table EKPO for which Final Invoice Indicator(EREKZ) is not set
Completed Only -- Table EKPO for which Final Invoice Indicator(EREKZ) is set
Regards
Ramesh Ch

How to apply the constraint ONLY to new rows

Hi, Gurus:
   I have one question as follows:
   We need to migrate a legacy system to a new production server. I am required to add two columns to every table in order to record who updates the row most recently through triggers, and I should apply not null constraint to the columns . However, since legacy system already has data for every table, and old data does not have value for the 2 new columns. If we apply the constraint, all of existing rows will raise exception. I wonder if there is possibility to apply the constraint ONLY to new rows to come in future.
Thanks.
Sam

   We need to migrate a legacy system to a new production server. I am required to add two columns to every table in order to record who updates the row most recently through triggers, and I should apply not null constraint to the columns .
The best suggestion I can give you is that you make sure management documents the name of the person that came up with that hair-brained requirement so they can be sufficiently punished in the future for the tremendous waste of human and database resources they caused for which they got virtually NOTHING in return.
I have seen many systems over the past 25+years that have added columns such as those: CREATED_DATE, CREATED_BY, MODIFIED_DATE, MODIFIED_BY.
I have yet to see even ONE system where that information is actually useful for any real purpose. Many systems have application/schema users and those users can modify the data. Also, any DBA can modify the data and many of them can connect as the schema owner to do that.
Many tables also get updated by other applications or bulk load processes and those processes use generic connections that can NOT be tied back to any particular system.
The net result is that those columns will be populated by user names that are utterly useless for any auditing purposes.
If a user is allowed to modify a table they are allowed to modify a table. If you want to track that you should implement a proper security strategy using Oracle's AUDIT functionality.
Cluttering up ALL, or even many, of your tables with such columns is a TERRIBLE idea. Worse is adding triggers that server no other purpose but capture useless infomation but, because they are PL/SQL cause performance impacts just aggravates the total impact.
It is certainly appropriate to be concerned about the security and auditability of your important data. But adding columns and triggers such as those proposed is NOT the proper solution to achieve that security.
Before your organization makes such an idiotic decision you should propose that the same steps be taken before adding that functionality that you should take before the addition of ANY MAJOR structural or application changes:
1. document the actual requirement
2. document and justify the business reasons for that requirement
3. perform testing that shows the impact of that requirement on the production system
4. determine the resource cost (people, storage, etc) of implementing that requirement
5. demonstrate how that information will actually be used EFFECTIVELY for some business purpose
As regards items #1 and #2 above the requirement should be stated in terms of the PROBLEM to be solved, not some preconceived notion of the solution that should be used.
Your org should also talk to other orgs or other depts in your same org that have used your proposed solution and find out how useful it has been for them. If you do this research you will likely find that it hasn't met their needs at all.
And in your own org there are likely some applications with tables that already have such columns. Has anyone there EVER used those columns and found them invaluable for identifying and resolving any actual problem?
If you can't use them and their data for some important process why add them to begin with?
IMHO it is a total waste of time and resources to add such columns to ALL of your tables. Any such approach to auditing or security should, at most, be limited to those tables with key data that needs to be protected and only then when you cannot implement the proper 'best practices' auditing.
A migration is difficult enough without adding useless additional requirements like those. You have FAR more important things you can do with the resources you have available:
1. Capture ALL DDL for the existing system into a version control system
2. Train your developers on using the version control system
3. Determining the proper configuration of the new server and system. It is almost a CERTAINTY that settings will get changed and performance will suffer even though you don't think you have changed anything at all.
4. Validating that the data has been migrated successfully. That can involve extensive querying and comparison to make sure data has not been altered during the migration. The process of validating a SINGLE TABLE is more difficult if the table structures are not the same. And they won't be if you add two columns to every table; every single query you do will have to specify the columns by name in order to EXCLUDE your two new columns.
5. Validating the performance of the app on the new system. There WILL BE problems where things don't work like they used to. You need to find those problems and fix them
6. Capturing the proper statistics after the data has been migrated and all of the indexes have been rebuilt.
7. Capturing the new execution plans to use a a baseline for when things go wrong in the future.
If it is worth doing it is worth doing right.

Sales Order Unable to Use New Condition Tables for Tax Condition Type

Dear All,
I am currently working on SAP R/3 4.0. I have a new requirement for my tax where I need to create new condition tables other than the 4 standard SAP tables which are Customer/Material, Division/Customer, Departure Country/Destination Country, Domestic Taxes and Export Taxes. My new tables consists of Departure Country/Destination Country/Shipping Point/Tax Code. The requirement is that the tax code is based on the chosen destination country and shipping point. The problem I am facing now is that no matter what types of table I create or even I generate with reference to the standard table, the access sequence will only refer to the 4 standard SAP tables above. Even if I put my own table in the highest priority for the access sequence, the same thing happens. My sales order will only pick up date from the standard table.
I wonder if anyone encountered the same problem as me.
Kindly advise.
Thank you.
Regards,
Yvonne

Hi
Yvonne
I suggest fist check a simple thing ,whether u have successfully determined shipping point for each line item ,it is possible that just adding a line item will not trigger shipping point determination . So after u update the shipping point on line level u can rerun pricing and check agian if u r getting it .
Secondly for tax purposes I suggest Try to have Customer and material tax classification approach this allows to u have long term flexibiliy and also reduces your maintenance activity . As if u change or add number of shipping points and business changes using the sequence of shipping point ,the logic of just using shipping point will not work.
In Tax classification u cna add new condition table for each new tax category and use it in different access sequences.
This information can be passed on to FI using Different Tax code for Different combination.
I hope this helps
Regards
Mandar

How to list OPEN sales orders only

Standard B1 sales analysis reports, report on ALL orders whether they are closed or not.
(i.e. sales A/R - Sales Reports - Sales Analysis - click the orders button - select date range)
The above returns all orders and I'd like to return ONLY the uninviced orders
Is it possible to report on OPEN orders only? If so how?

Hi Martin ,
I am providing you this suggesstion so that you can solve another issue effectively.
For example , You need to get sales order with status open,
Fo to sales ->Sales Order
On the menu bar -->View -->System information
Lets say you need togo to Check status , point your cursor at the particular field --you can see at the status bar it is coming from OCRD .Docstatus .similarly you can get information about the field you want in your report
So -go to query generator ,
select the table --OCRD ,
Select the field you want and execute .You build your query based on your need . You can put more filter based on where clause --where Docstatus='o'
Some basic sql command willbe more helpful to improve your skill .
Hope this helps .
'Bishal

Sales orders ONLY in APO and not in R/3

Dear Friends,
I have this peculiar but very critical problem wherein:
APO creates an extra schedule line to an ALREADY EXISTING sales order only in APO with a quantity in decimals like 130.320 PCs or whatever. Also, important to note is that this line has a required date very much in the future starting from 12-2009. Also, this sales order schedule line is non existent in R/3!
- I have checked the R/3 SD tables but nothing which relates to this qty.
- I have checked the sales order changes, but nothing in the history which suggests that someone might have changed it.
- I checked the UOM both in R/3 & APO but nothing.
Now, the problem is that:
How & what created this sales order?
If it is in APO, then y it isnt being sent to R/3 like all the other normal sales orders?
Most critical: APO sees this reqt & automatically creates a planned order (bckgrnd) which is then sent to R/3 as a recpt!!
Thanks in advance !

Team Eusap,
You say you ran LC consistency (which would be /SAPAPO/OM17). Did you also run CCR as I mentioned earlier?
Although there are no Queue errors, it is possible that someone has deleted the item from the queue. So, continue.
You can try to delete the order in APO using program /SAPAPO/SDORDER_DEL. Select Delete on database tab, deselect test, select the appropriate product/location(S). Select 'without check'. Select both boxes in Additional functions. Since you are not using GATP, you are not using allocations, but it is OK to select these items too. Execute. Stay away from the 'Delete all DB Sales order Data" tab!, or you may have to re-cif all your orders across. Now redo your LC consistency.
As far as your models are concerned, you need to assure yourself that there are no ATP (transactional, not material independent) models open. Use CFM5 to search.
As for the material independent CIF, it is a good idea to inactivate this model after the initial transfer. If you ever do any ATP config within APO, this model can overwrite some of the settings you created in APO. Usually this is undesirable.
Let me know if any of the above steps allow you to delete the APO order you don't want.
Rgds,
DB49

Is it possible to order ONLY a new dust jacket for Aperture Book?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for