Is it possible to see 'EXIF' data in video footage?

Is it possible to look at a video file and see what camera settings were used, which lenses were used. I believe I shot a scene with a 400mm lens and 1.4 TC extender but am not sure. Wish I could look back at the file and see that information like I can using still photography under 'file info.'
I'm using a Canon 7D and Canon lenses.
TIA,
Ken

From the Canon forums:
"The .THM file is simply a jpg file. Rename it to .jpg, and you'll see the data you're looking for. As far as I know, there's no other way to see what you shot the video at."
I've always noticed that the .MOV files from the camera also have an independent 'sidecar' file with the extension .THM, which I thought meant thumbnail, like of the first frame, but now this is what that file is.

Similar Messages

  • Is it possible to see the data after backing up iPhone on iTunes?

    Of course the pics are in there, but what about the contacts and apps etc.  Cant you see this info? whats the point of backing it up if you can't find it - lets say u lose your phone or left it somewhere and want to find a contact number…

    Since you backed up your device to iTunes, you can restore to Factory Settings, and the select Restore from Backup, then you select the backup you want to restore from and let it restore.
    And yes, your Photos take up an enormous amount of space. You can check yourself to see how much space they are taking (once you get restored) by going to Settings>General>Usage>Manage Storage. There you will see the list of items on your device and how much room each of them takes.
    You need to import your photos to a computer, or store them on a cloud service like Dropbox or Flikr.
    To import to a Mac or PC:
    PHOTO IMPORT IOS TO MAC/PC
    And again, you did not indicate whether you have Contacts turned on in iCloud. If you do, then you can see them in iCloud.com on your computer.
    Cheers,
    GB

  • Is it possible to transfer stored (b-roll) video footage from Final Cut Express to Final Cut Pro event library? Is so, what do I need?

    I have been editing in final cut express and now that I'm working in Pro X I would like to transfer my b-roll footage from FCX to Pro X. I read that there is an app. that you can buy that does this for Final Cut Pro 7, is this possible with Final Cut Express?

    Any media used in FCE can be used in FCP. No third party software is required.
    You cannot take an FCE project to FCP. 7toX will not help as FCE has no XML export.

  • Photoshop not seeing lens model in exif data from A3 export

    Hi, I am trying to use the lens correction features in CS5 but the lens type can't be read in the exif data of an image I've exported from A3. It sees the focal length and body type. The lens type is listed in the Metadata Inspector in A3. I took the image into iPhoto and checked "extended photo info" and the lens type isn't there either. This happens with at least 2 lenses. One prime and one zoom. Any ideas?

    Hi again
    Having played with metadata a bit more, it is possible to include EXIF data for the lens size etc.. eg...EF300mm f2.8L IS USM But it doesn't append the manufacturer's name, eg I use Canon, yet 'Canon' is not appended to the Lens data like it is to the camera name..
    In the library Inspector click > Metadata > where it says 'General' click the down arrow, then click > Edit > from the window that appears click > EXIF > from the drop down list click > Lens (scroll down a bit)
    The lens you used will now be appended to your data.
    I have not tried exporting this to Photoshop so maybe you could post back if its possible to export this data to PS or not.
    Maybe someone has information on this and can chip in here with advice....
    Hope this is helpful....... Gerry....
    PS to all reading this, I also noticed while playing around with this ( I have not delved into metadata too much since Ap2) that all my personal details like mobile number, address, email etc are all appended by default, I imagine my address book info has been used here.
    A useful feature indeed while selling photo's, or if you intend it to be there..... but not so good if you are not aware it's there in the first place.....!
    Just a shared thought to whom it may concern....... Gerry.
    Message was edited by: windhoveruk

  • Sony A6000 DRO: is it possible to view Dynamic Range Optimization EXIF data in Lightroom?

    The Sony A6000 has a feature called Dynamic Range Optimization.  You can set this to DRO Auto or set manual DRO levels (1-2-3-4-5).  This setting is recorded in the Metadata (EXIF) by the camera.  The Sony IDC software can see it - but LR5 does not. (LR supports the A6000.)  I assume Sony does something non-standard here, but it there any possibility of LR showing this EXIF data?  It is very handy for sorting through the photos (especially when you use DRO bracketing where the camera creates three JPGs with different DRO settings - either 1-2-3 or 1-3-5).
    David

    Hi Quinn.
    I'm not sure if this will help, but here's a snapshot of the table I'd like to use as source for a pop-up. It's part of a Sheet called "Rolling Rota", and whilst you can see each cell is presently a pop-up, it needn't be. I'd be happy to use this range of cells to set the staff names which then feed a range of pop-ups (in defined cells) when I run a script.
    Once again, any help would be appreciated.
    Ces

  • Seeing a photos exif data inside iPhoto

    Is there anyway to find and view the full realm of EXIF data of photos inside iPhoto? I want to be able to see the shutter speed, aperture, exposure value, etc. I know that I can see this in Photoshop but would like to be able to see it in iPhoto without opening the picture up in Photoshop. Can anyone help me here? Thanks.

    The only way would be to set up a 3rd party EXIF viewer as the editor of choice in iPhoto. Then you could double click on a photo and bring up it's EXIF data in the EXIF viewer. A good viewer is EXIF Viewer.
    Once you set up the viewer as the editor of choice you can reset the editor to iPhoto but still open the viewer by clicking on the photo and selecting "Open in external editor" from the contextual menu. That way you get the best of both worlds.
    TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto (iPhoto.Library for iPhoto 5 and earlier) database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
    I've created an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger or later), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. It's compatible with iPhoto 6 and 7 libraries and Tiger and Leopard. iPhoto does not have to be closed to run the application, just idle. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.≤br>
    Note: There now an Automator backup application for iPhoto 5 that will work with Tiger or Leopard.

  • Is possible to see group currency data in SAP provide report or query ?

    Dear experts:
             Is possible to see group currency data in SAP provide report or query for Assets. When the Depreciation area currency is different with the group currency?
    My SAP version is ECC 6.0.
    Depreciation area currency: USD,
    Company code currency: USD,
    Second local currency: Group currency(TWD)

    You must have defined an additional dep area for group valuation too.
    then only you can get the asset values in TWD curency.

  • I am new to Photoshop Elements.  How can I see the exif data of my photograph?

    I am new to Photoshop Elements.  How can I see the exif data of a photo?

    I have Elements 10.  Sorry I am really struggling with the programme and I
    don’t see the word Menu anywhere on the editor screen.
    Rev. Dr. Jill Morley
    PO Box 51059
    Musgrave Rd.
    Durban.
    [email protected]
    0837791978 (c)
    0312080473 (h) and (f)

  • Where can I give feedback regarding Aperture? I'd love to see the ability to removes EXIF data when exporting, especially to social networks.

    Where can I give feedback regarding Aperture?
    I'd love to see the ability to removes EXIF data when exporting, especially to social networks.

    Robert,
    For any normal Export, simply cilick the list of option and further click on Edit.  There deselect to include Metadata, and there will be no EXIF data exported.  But no copyright info either.
    The option already exists to do what you want.  Once a normal Export has deselected that, I believe even exports via plugin for say FB will not have it either.  I tested with an export to SmugMug after deselecting in an earlier ordinary export, and EXIF info was not transmitted.
    Ernie

  • What are the forensic limitations of Metadata & Exif Data+ Adobe Photoshop 3 question; e.g. Metadata

    I have some questions regarding metadata, and exif data on digital   cameras and its forensic limitations in Adobe photoshop 3;
    For  instance; After a picture is taken and has a metadata/exif digital   stamp of the "picture being taken day" under what circumstances can  that  "picture being taken day" be changed?
    Does the picture  being taken day change when you import it into adobe  photoshop 3 and  add a caption?
    Does it change only when the picture is edited,  to perhaps add a white  sidebar that says "family photo" or whatever?
    Under what circumstances does the exif/metadata digital time stamp  of  the "picture being taken day" change?
    Also, is it possible  to change the picture being taken day on a  photograph in adobe  photoshop 3 manually?
    Thanks-
    Phil

    I guess it would be easier to give you an example. The above picture shows the exif data as 9.11.2001. How is this possible if this is a 911 victim? In the top metadata, it says Adobe photoshop 3. I assume this is the program it was last edited in? Or was adobe software used exclusively in cameras back then perhaps? I am not sure, I just know I have many questions I really want answers to. Was the exif data changed perhaps in the above photo on 9.11.2001 to add that white sidebar, which says (Family photo) ?? Click the image below to see the screenshot of what I am looking at, this way we are on the same page or picture so to  speak.
    Any help you can give will be greatly appreciatted...
    Thanks,
    Phil

  • How to view video Exif data in Bridge

    I cannot view video Exif (i.e., camera settings) data in Bridge.  I can see it for still images.  I shoot video in both MOV and MTS, but can see it for neither.  How do I view it?

    Thanks.  Is there some equivalent of Exif information for video?  For stills, I shoot RAW and much appreciate being able to veiw the camera settings once the file is in Bridge.  I'm new to video.  It would be even more helpful for me to see the video details, so I can better learn from my practicing.  I can view some video file data in my camera after shooting:  f-stop, white balance method, compression method, aspect ratio, and frame rate.  So, this data is being captured and stored on my memory card.  After downloading to Bridge, I'd like to be able to view this same info there.  Is this possible?

  • Lightroom strips very valuable EXIF data - details

    Hey everyone - I've just been playing around with some EXIF stuff, and I noticed something very concerning.
    I do a lot of macro photography, specifically with Canon's MP-E 65mm 1x-5x Macro. This lens records its macro magnification factor in the EXIF data, and does so far more accurately and conveniently than I can.
    I know that Lightroom and Photoshop strip out A LOT of obscure EXIF data when processed, but this magnification data is extremely valuable when reviewing my photos at a later date.
    I can provide sample files if needed, and here is my observations so far:
    - data stays intact when converting from .CR2 to .DNG
    - data is stripped when converting to JPG, TIFF, and other formats
    - data is stripped by both Lightroom and Photoshop
    Here is the EXIF data (from exiftool) right from the Canon CR2 or DNG file (both are identical):
    http://don.komarechka.com/exif/exif-original.txt
    Here is the EXIF data (from exiftool) from a jpg that has gone through Lightroom:
    http://don.komarechka.com/exif/exif-lightroom.txt
    You'll notice a HUGE amount of extra data in the original raw file. It is certainly worth noting that the EXIF data in a JPG, unaltered from the camera, contains all of the same data as the RAW file.
    So, is this something that has been overlooked, is there any way to change this behaviour? Even though Lightroom might not be able to decode this data, I don't see a reason why it cannot be left intact.
    Thank you.
    - Don Komarechka
    http://don.komarechka.com

    donkom wrote:
    clvrmnky, thanks for your response.
    Here's an example for you, the one I've been giving:
    I shoot with a special macro lensm the Canon MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1-5x Macro. This lens does not zoom, but the magnification can change from 1x to 5x.This lens communicates its magnification to one decimal point accuracy to the camera, which adds it to the maker notes.
    This is important in reviewing images for a number of reasons, including calculating the effective aperture and depth fo field. This is a valuable piece of information that is stored within the makernotes that is removed from the image when sending it through LR, Photoshop, or ACR.
    That isn't the only valuable information, however.
    The makernotes will tell me if the image was captured using LiveView, if Mirror Lockup was used, if the shot is part of a bracketed set, what the internal camera temperature was, etc. etc.
    I'm not sure you've justified your reasoning behind why this block of data shouldn't be blindly copied. If it is removed simply because it is not understood, I would like the option to understand this data on my own, using third-party tools, after the image has left LR.
    I understand that this can be proprietary, but likely far less so than the RAW file formats that LR and ACR already understand. It would be trivial to understand where this block of data begins and ends and to leave it in the file on export.
    I think this would allow for more in-depth searching based on metadata, for whoever wants to take up that torch. For example, what if I want to see all macro photos I took at a 4x magnification or higher. What if I want to see all photo I took using LiveView. Even if LR doesn't want to do this, stripping the data out prevents anyone else from doing it in the future.
    Well, there is an SDK for metadata that has been around for awhile, which allows for custom metadata definitions. But, according to the SDK:
    "Values stored in custom metadata fields are stored only in Lightroom's database. In the current release, a plug-in cannot link custom metadata fields to XMP values or save them with the image file."
    So, this is more for searching and interfacing with tagset plugins.
    Even so, using the SDK to get at maker notes is a losing proposition.
    Note that some metadata is proprietary and will not be read into the database. This is to be expected. Lr is not an arbitrary metadata reading app, and there is no guarantee that any app could read all metadata. For example, Lr tries its best to get the serial number info, but this is because there is a lot of value in that for other Lr operations. So the contortions necessary to reliably get that is worth it. Another example is lens info (which is a twisty maze of passages; no app is ever guaranteed to actually retrieve lens info reliably in all cases) where there is a lot of value trying to extract the information that makers often store in very interesting ways. In some of those cases I think Lr will look in the maker notes, but only after exhausting other avenues, and with the caveat that it may never be able to get some information. The app does its best to get at the most valuable info it can get that fits with the standardized metadata models in place.
    However, the key here is that maker note data is not in exported files that Lr makes, because it is not normalized data that belongs to the vendor. (This obviates the recommendation of using Metadata Wrangler, which can filter out only that metdata that exists in Lr; I had vaguely remembered a setting that referred to this section but was wrong.)
    The field and data formats are not standardized, so you are asking Lr to understand most or all data from all or most lenses and bodies (all of it in varying degrees of similarity and difference) not just data from this lens and this body.
    This is also not a trivial matter of "copying" the maker notes over, because copying implies parsing and duplicating what is essentially unknown formatted data containing proprietary data, possibly by custom serialization routines. Remember that maker notes were never intended to be editable, and could be composed of any number of data formats. Some cameras make maker notes that are megabytes of nulls and nothing else!
    I think you are out of luck for this specific case.  Perhaps with EXIF 3 we will have a more standardized interface cameras and software can more easily interoperate on shared data. Makers need to stop using the maker notes! It was always an egregious hack.
    One workaround I can think of is to have a post-export action that uses EXIFTool to update exported images. For those cases where it matters, you could create your own "sidecar" file that has only the maker notes, and then shove those into the JPEG after they are created, or just read it from the on-disk copy and then put it in the new file (possibly in the same directory and added back into the catalogue for convenience.)

  • EXIF data - Why is so much is missing in LRx but in RAW / DNG / CR2 images

    I've seen the limitations in the EXIF data as shown in LR. I've seen the comments that it would be SO useful to sort / filter by all the EXIF data available in LR.
    However LR shows a small proportion of the information that is available in the Meta data but there is missing EXIF data, that is of use to users, not every day, but it is there and with the aforementioned improvement of searching / sorting / grouping / stacking, I'd like this data to be accessible.
    I was looking to find all the correctly exposed images in sets of 3 auto bracketted images -2, 0, +2 from todays shoot but this info is not listed in LR
    So I looked in PhotoGrok, and it told me that the image I was looking at was AEBBracketValue -2, ie 2 stops under exposed in a set of auto bracket.
    It also told me my camera was 37º when I was shooting in Cape Town this morning. It most certainly was not that warm outside.
    My reason for finding the correctly exposed images in the sets was to see if they had sufficient exposure data to be used as one image rather than combining the 3 bracketted images using fusion / enBlend software to rescue the shadow detail and highlight detail in my shoot.
    If you do play with PhotoGrok, you see more info than may be / is / could possibly be useful. But it does list a great deal.
    I do get the basics
    exposure
    aperture
    focal length
    35mm equivalent
    focal distance
    hyperfocal distance
    colour balance
    AEBBracketValue
    and the list goes on.
    More importantly, this data has been extracted by LR from Canon 5DII CR2 files to DNG, so LR can see all this info.
    Anyway, that is my request.
    There is limited EXIF data displayed in LR, there are requests for sorting / searching / listing / stacking by more of the meta data that LR accesses.
    I would like to see much more of this data available to be sorted / searched / stacked, so I can find amongst all the EXIF data, the AEBBracketValue = 0, ie correctly exposed images.
    Rob Cole  - Does your anyfilter access more of this info?
    Hillrdg- you asked me to give my motivations for making suggestions, so I''ve taken your advise on board and to substantiate my argument.
    yes, there is a workaround - It is to sort all the photos by capture time or file number and arrange them into 3 images in a grid view and just select the correct column, but this is slow. More importantly, this request is about vastly improving access to EXIF data and for other uses of the vast amount of EXIF data available in images.
    hamish NIVEN Photography

    EricInsalaco wrote:
    Now I was under the impression Preview/Versions only take up a miniscule space on the HD since they don't FULLY copy the master file, they more create a bridge between the two that amounts to a few MB. Is it possible that it's taking up a much larger amount than intended here (a la the same basic mail attachment problem, but with Preview)? If so, what directory would that be located in?
    Apple's documentation on Versions and what is kept in the Versions database is misleading, in my experience, though others will argue to the contrary.
    In any case, all the Versions files and the database that keeps track of them are in an invisible folder in the root directory called
    .DocumentRevisions-V100
    The easiset way to check its size is to show invisible files by pasting the following command in Terminal:
    defaults write com.apple.finder AppleShowAllFiles TRUE; killall Finder
    press 'return' on the keyboard.
    Now navigate to the hard disk in Finder and you should see DocumentRevisions and its size.
    To turn off invisible files, use the same command as above but replace TRUE with FALSE.
    Message was edited by: softwater

  • Exif Data in pages

    Hello all,
    Does anyone know if it's possible to automatically include EXIF data (like, lens type, camera model...) in Master pages or in pages? If yes, please tell me how. I need to print a book with technical shooting data and possibly, I want them auto inserted.
    Thanks for Help
    Riccardo

    Hey, wow that was a quick reply
    Well all my photos are in Aperture, so I did think that I could grab the EXIF data from there and then place them in text boxes on my pages. I have hundreds of photos and doing it that way could take a long time! I was curious to see if there was something that would automate this for me within iWeb. For example, RapidWeaver allows you to check a tick box to display EXIF data under each photo. That's what im looking for within iWeb

  • Missing/Corrupt EXIF Data

    I was looking at a folder of images today, and noticed that the camera data was not showing up and the images looked out of focus. Moments later the camera data showed up but the images still looked blurry (thumbs). Suddenly all the thumbs in the folder disappeared, being replaced by the .nef icon. I mean instantly, they all changed to the icon. I tried to open but got the message:
    "Could not complete the request because it is not the right kind of document. "
    So I tried to open it using DXO and it returned :
    "This image cannot be processed since its EXIF data cannot be read or is missing".
    Right click the image and the File Info is missing from the menu.
    How does this happen? I have opened these images in the past. I can imagine the instant insanity should all my .nef's suddenly do this!
    I am using Bridge running Photoshop CC on Win 7 64 bit. The .xmp data exists according to Win Explorer. There is no Bridge cache showing for the folder in Win explorer.
    I am unsure as to whether this belongs here or in Bridge or???

    I don’t think WFW would know about any outsider accessing the file on dropbox since it runs on your local computer.  If this is the first time you’ve used dropbox, it may have been asking for permission for dropbox to access your local system via the public network (there are local, domain and public tiers in the firewall rules) since dropbox synchronizes things between computers via the data stored in the dropbox cloud storage. 
    In other words, I downloaded the file to my local computer using the public link you provided, and wasn’t logged in as you, so would have been accessing the dropbox cloud for retrieve the file but not be logged in as you, but I don’t think the WFW would know I was doing anything for that interaction because that is between me and the cloud, not something on your local computer.  Depending on how you answered the WFW question, you may have blocked dropbox from doing its normal things.  You can get into the WFW configuration in Admin Tools (or maybe Control Panel) and enable things for a particular program that you may have disabled by mistake.
    Back to the corrupted file issue:  spot-check a few of the bad files on the backup, right-click Properties, and look at the Created Date and Modified Date, compared to the expected date the backup first would have copied them, to see if either indicates the date the zeros were written.  You might want to compare those dates on files that are ok, to see if there is some difference in pattern.  It is possible the backup software updates those dates to be what the source files dates are which might mask the backup-software's last-copy date, which is what you want.
    If you can determine the date for the zeros and it is fairly recent, then the system event log might list something as having occurred. 
    If there haven't been any viruses, then I'd say it was a transient condition, either in the circuit-boards or cabling or the hard-drive media, itself. 
    Has the computer ever locked up so you had to turn the power off to get control back of the mouse? 
    You can test the hard-drive media for errors by chkdsk d: /r or chkdsk d: /b (or the gui-scandisk equivalents) to scan for data errors--iffy media problems.  Move any virtual-memory swapfile off that drive if you want to test it while the computer is running.  Maybe do a plain chkdsk, first, one where you don't fix problems and don't test the media, which would find problems indicated with zeros in the directory-structure, first.  And if you find any of those, disconnect your backup drive in case the "fixes" corrupt even more things and that gets replicated.
    A chkdsk that fixes media problems will likely take several/many hours.

Maybe you are looking for