Is JDBC multi threaded

Newbie to JDBC and XMLDB
Is it possible to create a java application that has multpule threads that are inserting xml documents into10g using the JDBC driver that comes with 10g?
(Is the JDBC multi-threaded?)

Yes....
Search otn for the sax loader example...

Similar Messages

Multi Threading in EJB by sending requests to JDBC or JMS queue

Hi,
I know that multi-threading is not permitted on EJB, but I'm planning an application which has to send a copule of requests to another system in parallel. So the EJB should be talking to any number of other systems at one time.
In an application I would simply create some threads, and that's it. With EJB this is not possible, so I've come up with the following idea:
A Queuing system will be implemented. This can be a simple table in a database or a message bean (JMS-Java Message Service). In both cases request objects have to be serialized into byte streams and stored as a Binary Object (e.g. Oracle BLOB) in the database or attach somehow to the JMS message.
Some sort of queue processor looks at the queue, deserializes the requests, does something and sends back a response (again by serialization and through db or jms).
Technically the db solution should work, I've been doing ths (de)serialization of java objects into an oracle blob, and it works. Creating a process which scans a database should also work, and with timestamps I can implement a queue.
With JMS I'm not that sure, mainly because I'm not familiar with it :-). But as far as I know some JMS vendors (I do not remember who) are using database for messaging anyway.
Any comments ?
Thanks

As I understand JMS, the database is used for persistence of messages before they are acknowledged.
If persistence is turned on, once a message arrives on the queue, the message object is serialized and stored in the database with an appropriate primary key.
When the consumer calls the receive() method the Message Object is sent to the consumer, when this acknowledged the corresponding entry is removed from the database.

Enterprise User and Multi Thread Server

Hi,
We are going to build a system which uses a configuration:
10g2
Enterprise User
Multi Thread Server
Client apps accesses db over JDBC/SSL
Could some please share experience about issues regarding
using Enterprise User and Multi Thread Server ?
Is MTS transparant for Enterprise User authentication ?
Regards,
Cezary

If you build simpserv with -t, and set MIN and MAXDISPATCHTHREADS, you
should have an example of a multithreaded server.
Scott
Johan Philippe wrote:
>
We have been going to the documentation on multi-threading and contexting in servers
on Tuxedo 7.1.
And the impression so far is that apart from the function definitions there is
not much information around.
Didn't even find a simple example of a multi-threaded server in the Bea refs yet.
Does anyone know/have such an example?
And is anyone using multi-contexting in a server, because the limitation that
only server-dispatched
thread get a context puts quite a limitation on its usefullness.

Is Oracle JDBC driver thread safe

Is the Oracle JDBC driver thread safe?

Seems that this is not totally true.
We have a Problem with Oracle JDBC driver 9.2.0.5.0 (thin)
Using an IBM JDK 1.4
Szenario:
Thread 1 access to a CLOB via
ResulSet.getCharacterStream(int)
Thread 2 normal access via some select and
ResulSet.getString(int)
(Both using the same connection)
The following threads appear to be in a circular deadlock.
Further information can be found by looking in the Overall Thread Analysis
section of this tool.
Multi-threaded deadlock 1:
"Servlet.Engine.Transports : 6" of (sys:0x39778800) (TID:0x104590D0)
Holding Resource: oracle.jdbc.ttc7.TTC7Protocol@1ADEB358/1ADEB360
Thread Waiting: "ProcessNotificationTask" (sys:0x3C51FC18) (TID:0x103B4C40)
"ProcessNotificationTask" of (sys:0x3C51FC18) (TID:0x103B4C40)
Holding Resource: oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleConnection@1AE45160/1AE45168
Thread Waiting: "Servlet.Engine.Transports : 6" (sys:0x39778800) (TID:0x104590D0)
4XESTACKTRACE at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatement.doExecuteQuery(OracleStatement.java:2667)
4XESTACKTRACE at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatement.doExecuteWithTimeout(OracleStatement.java:2840)
4XESTACKTRACE at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement.executeUpdate(OraclePreparedStatement.java:608)
4XESTACKTRACE at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement.executeQuery(OraclePreparedStatement.java:536)
4XESTACKTRACE at com.top_logic.knowledge.service.db.DBKnowledgeBase.getObjectsByAttribute(Unknown Source)
4XESTACKTRACE at oracle.jdbc.ttc7.TTC7Protocol.getLobChunkSize(TTC7Protocol.java:3050)
4XESTACKTRACE at oracle.sql.LobDBAccessImpl.getChunkSize(LobDBAccessImpl.java:687)
4XESTACKTRACE at oracle.sql.CLOB.getChunkSize(CLOB.java:692)
4XESTACKTRACE at oracle.sql.CLOB.getBufferSize(CLOB.java:717)
4XESTACKTRACE at oracle.sql.CLOB.getCharacterStream(CLOB.java:345)
4XESTACKTRACE at oracle.sql.CLOB.characterStreamValue(CLOB.java:1377)
4XESTACKTRACE at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatement.getCharacterStreamValue(OracleStatement.java:5817)
4XESTACKTRACE at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleResultSetImpl.getCharacterStream(OracleResultSetImpl.java:1230)
It seems that the access to the CLOB needs another,
internal SELECT to the Database and this way
TTC7Protocol and OracleConnection lock out each other.
This only happens on a true multiprocessor machine.
We tried to reprodcue it on a Single Processor
and some HyperThreading Machine but had no real sucess.
Now where can I sumbit this as a Bug ?

JMS multi thread best practise

Hi,
I would like to code a JMS layer that could be accessed by
a multi thread environment (a web app)
Is there any "Connection-Pool/DAO" equivalent design
pattern for JMS ?
Form what I know, connection are Thread Safe and Sessions
are not ...
Philippe

Many J2EE providers have their own JMS facades which provide pooling - so you could just use your container's JMS wrappers.
Another option, if you are inside a Servlet Engine, is to use Jencks which provides JMS & JDBC connection pooling as well as pooling of threads & message listeners & exception handling when consuming JMS messages.
e.g. here's inbound message consumption...
http://jencks.org/Message+Driven+POJOs
and here's outbound JMS (i.e. pooling when sending JMS messages etc)
http://jencks.org/Outbound+JMS
Jencks is basically a Spring based JCA container so it takes care of all the pooling for you as well as handling message inflow & outflow and can work with XA if you need it as well as local transactions.
James
http://logicblaze.com/

Multi thread D/B access design.

Hi,
I'm trying to performance test a 3 tiered design from client > TCP/IP to Server > ODBC to MSQL.
I have a multi thread requesting client which connects via sockets to the server.
The server kicks off multithread servelets which create a connection via ODBC ( Or reuse an existing one ) and communicates the data back to the requesting client.
However, no matter the number of threads/ports/connections/ODBC data sources/Device managers I use I always get a linear progression for the data I am accessing.
ie 1 file of 1000 records is 390 milliseconds, 10 is 4600 milliseconds etc.
Is there somethings simple I'm missing out to make the access to the server linear ?
The only option I'm considering at the moment is that the MSQL V 7.0 I have is the free one with visual studio and so has been "enhanced" to provide reduced performance.
Any ideas ?
Cheers,
Gary

The answer to you question is JDBC-ODBC BRIDGE IS SYNCHRONIZED..meaning it is SINGLE THREADED. No matter how many threads you create to access your database, only one thread enters the monitor at a time. The monitor I am referring to is the process space allocated to the thread at any given time, in your case I am referring to the process space as the particular lines of code which are responsible for database access. Your problem can be solved if you go for other database drivers( like type 4 drivers ). There are a variety of mutithreadd drivers available for most of the databases. I have raised this question at Sun Seminars also , and apparently this seems to be the only solution..
Cheers,
Shafique Razzaque,
Senior Apps Developer,
Singapore.

Multi-thread serialization

In order to bench my database i made an application that just call some procedures (rselect only no update or insert).
The application instanciate 15 threads, each with a connection to my database.
My problem is that it seems that my calls are serialiazed and take a lot of time to answer.
But if I launch multiple instances of my application ( each with only 1 thread) I don't have this problem.
How can I avoid this problem ?
Thanks, bernard

Here's the test code I've been using for ad-hoc multi-threaded testing; it's a bit sloppy, but it works and I no longer have time to finish the project up right and pretty. At the risk of derision from the better Java programmers here, I post it and hereby dedicate this mess to the public domain. Enjoy...
3 Java files.
File 1:
import java.util.ArrayList;
public class DBTest {
    public static void main (String args[]) {
        TestHarness testSuite1;
        ArrayList testSet1 = new ArrayList();
        for ( int i=0; i< 2; i++) {
            testSet1.add(new Check1(2) );
        testSuite1 = new TestHarness (testSet1);
        testSuite1.go();
        testSuite1.report(System.out);
class Check1 extends Thread {
    private long runLength;
    private int myThreadNumber;
    private static int threadNumber = 0;
    private static Object lockObj = new Object();
    public Check1 (int _runLength) {
        runLength = _runLength;
        synchronized(lockObj) {
            myThreadNumber = threadNumber++;
    public Check1 () {
        this(10);
    public void run () {
        try {
            BusyDB workload = new BusyDB();
            workload.beBusy (runLength, myThreadNumber);
        catch (InterruptedException e) {
            System.err.println("Interrupted !");
        catch (Exception e) {
            e.printStackTrace(System.err);
    public String toString() {
        return "thread " + myThreadNumber + ": iterated for " + runLength + " iterations\n";
}File 2:
import java.sql.*;
public class BusyDB
        private static long iterModulus = 1000;
        public void beBusy(long iterations, int threadID)
                throws Exception
                Class.forName("oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver");
                Connection con = null;
                PreparedStatement ps1;
                ResultSet rs1;
                int i = 0;
                try {
                        while ( i < iterations )
                        con = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:oracle:thin:user/password@db_host:1521:db_sid");
                        con.setAutoCommit(false);
                        ps1 = con.prepareStatement("select sysdate from dual");
                        rs1 = ps1.executeQuery();
                        i++;
                        if (i % iterModulus == 0)
                                System.out.println("Thread number " + threadID +": " + iterModulus
                                                        + " more iterations " + i + " total iterations");
                                con.commit();
                        rs1.close();
                        if( con != null ) con.close();
                catch (Exception e)
                        e.printStackTrace(System.out);
                        i = i + 1;
                } finally {
                        if( con != null ) con.close();
}File 3:
import java.io.PrintStream;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.Iterator;
public class TestHarness
    private Collection subTests;
    private boolean wasInterrupted = false;
    private final long created = System.currentTimeMillis();
    private long start, end;
    private String testSuiteName;
    public TestHarness ( Collection subTests ) {
        this.subTests = subTests;
        this.testSuiteName = "anonymous";
    public void go () {
        start = System.currentTimeMillis();
        System.out.println("Test suite " + testSuiteName + " started: " + start);
        Iterator i = subTests.iterator();
        while (i.hasNext() ) ((Thread)i.next() ).start();
        System.out.println("All subtests finished starting at: " + System.currentTimeMillis() );
        i = subTests.iterator();
        try {
            while (i.hasNext() ) {
                ((Thread)i.next() ).join();
        catch (InterruptedException e) {
            wasInterrupted = true;
        end = System.currentTimeMillis();
        System.out.println("All subtests finished running at: " + end );
    public void report( PrintStream out) {
        out.println ("\nTest Suite: " + testSuiteName);
        out.println ("Runtime millis: " + (end - start) );
        Iterator i = subTests.iterator();
        while (i.hasNext() ) out.print( i.next().toString() );
        if (wasInterrupted) {
            out.println("======== ERROR ========");
            out.println("Test thread interrupted");
}

Multiple Containers read/write access in multi-threaded environment

I'm been reading the Berkeley DB XML Transaction Processing document and have a few questions. I have a multi-threaded environment (not multi-process).
1) In the "Summary and Examples" section, there is an example of several worker threads that perform many writes to a shared container. The one container is passed to all the worker threads, rather them having their own instance of the container. In my application, I could potentially have multiple worker threads acting on the same container, is it better to provide some type of connection pool, so each thread has access to the same container? Is their a problem with each thread creating a new instance of the container and writing to that? Is their pros and cons to each approach?
2) In some specific web applications, they only require read-access and have no intention of writing to the database. If the environment was created with transactions, can these applications open the environment in read-only mode, so as to not suffer the performance penalty of using transactions? Or do they still require transaction support since other threads in other applications might be writing to it. Is it better in this case to
3) Is there any decent connection pooling framework that work well with BDB XML? If transactions are involved, it seems pretty important to always close the container once you are finished with it, which kind of defeats the purpose of pooling. I see a container somewhat analogous to a JDBC transaction, where in connection pooling these transactions remain open, but in BDB XML, it doesn't seem like this is good practice. So clarification here would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance...
Chris

Chris,
I'd be careful about trying to draw too many analogies with other sorts of systems. In many ways BDB XML is simpler -- it's just a library, no server process.
An open container is analogous to an open file handle/descriptor in your operating system. It can safely be shared by all threads within a given process. In fact, you should not create more than one -- while that works, it can just be confusing, and a source of errors (for example, if you use a different path to open the container each time, you'll have problems). So by all means share them. Most Java applications just point them in a class that is accessible to all threads.
Other objects that can, and should be shared among threads include:
Environment
XmlManager
XmlQueryExpression
Most others should not. You also mention closing your containers -- there is no reason to close your active container objects until your application needs to shut down. A long-running application will want to use db_checkpoint (or equivalent) to ensure that modified pages are flushed from the transaction log to the database files, but that's about it.
As for concurrency, you obviously need transactions for concurrent write operations. If you want concurrent read access to the same containers, they should use transactions as well. Even if you don't explicitly use transactions, locks are always taken on pages in transactional containers. You cannot open the same container transactionally and not transactionally at the same time -- bad things could happen.
Depending on your performance needs, you could using snapshot concurrency, and see how it works for you. While locking does incur some overhead, it may be acceptable.
You mention creating your own "snapshot" of a container and running read-only on that copy. That's possible to do, but you have to be careful of how you create the snapshot (following hot backup procedures). Also, if you intend to open that "new" container in the same environment or application as the old one, you need to run a program on it to change its internal identification so Berkeley DB won't think it's the same file. That is, you can't just copy a container file to a new name and just open it like it's a new container if it's still in the vicinity of the original. See the -r option for the db_load program.
Now that you are probably really confused, good luck!
Regards,
George

SSRS - Is there a multi thread safe way of displaying information from a DataSet in a Report Header?

In order to dynamically display data in the Report Header based in the current record of the Dataset, we started using Shared Variables, we initially used ReportItems!SomeTextbox.Value, but we noticed that when SomeTextbox was not rendered in the body
(usually because a comment section grow to occupy most of the page if not more than one page), then the ReportItem printed a blank/null value.
So, a method was defined in the Code section of the report that would set the value to the shared variable:
public shared Params as String
public shared Function SetValues(Param as String ) as String
Params = Param
Return Params
End Function
Which would be called in the detail section of the tablix, then in the header a textbox would hold the following expression:
=Code.Params
This worked beautifully since, it now didn't mattered that the body section didn't had the SetValues call, the variable persited and the Header displayed the correct value. Our problem now is that when the report is being called in different threads with
different data, the variable being shared/static gets modified by all the reports being run at the same time.
So far I've tried several things:
- The variables need to be shared, otherwise the value set in the Body can't be seen by the header.
- Using Hashtables behaves exactly like the ReportItem option.
- Using a C# DLL with non static variables to take care of this, didn't work because apparently when the DLL is being called by the Body generates a different instance of the DLL than when it's called from the header.
So is there a way to deal with this issue in a multi thread safe way?
Thanks in advance!

Hi Angel,
Per my understanding that you want to dynamic display the group data in the report header, you have set page break based on the group, so when click to the next page, the report hearder will change according to the value in the group, when you are using
the shared variables you got the multiple thread safe problem, right?
I have tested on my local environment and can reproduce the issue, according to the multiple safe problem the better way is to use the harshtable behaves in the custom code, you have mentioned that you have tryied touse the harshtable but finally got
the same result as using the ReportItem!TextBox.Value, the problem can be cuased by the logic of the code that not works fine.
Please reference to the custom code below which works fine and can get all the expect value display on every page:
Shared ht As System.Collections.Hashtable = New System.Collections.Hashtable
Public Function SetGroupHeader( ByVal group As Object _
,ByRef groupName As String _
,ByRef userID As String) As String
Dim key As String = groupName & userID
If Not group Is Nothing Then
Dim g As String = CType(group, String)
If Not (ht.ContainsKey(key)) Then
' must be the first pass so set the current group to group
ht.Add(key, g)
Else
If Not (ht(key).Equals(g)) Then
ht(key) = g
End If
End If
End If
Return ht(key)
End Function
Using this exprssion in the textbox of the reportheader:
=Code.SetGroupHeader(ReportItems!Language.Value,"GroupName", User!UserID)
Links belowe about the hashtable and the mutiple threads safe problem for your reference:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2067537/ssrs-code-shared-variables-and-simultaneous-report-execution
http://sqlserverbiblog.wordpress.com/2011/10/10/using-custom-code-functions-in-reporting-services-reports/
If you still have any problem, please feel free to ask.
Regards
Vicky Liu

Memory leaks and multi threading issues in managed client.

In our company we use a lot of Oracle, and after the release of the managed provider we migrated all applications to it. First the things were very impressive : the new client was faster, but after some days applications that uses 100MB with old client goes to 1GB and up. The memory is not the only issue, we use a lot of multi threading, and we experience connection drops and not disposal, after 1 days working one of the application had over 100 sessions on the server. I think there is something wrong with connection pool and multi threading.
Is someone experience same problems.
Yesterday we went back with unmanaged provider. Now things are back to normal.

connection drops: did you try to use "Validate Connection=true" parameter in your connection string?
the new client was faster: are you sure with this statement? Even in 64bit environment? I got quite serious performance problems when running application under 64bit process: https://forums.oracle.com/thread/2595323

How to write a multi threaded Cache Event Listener

I have a distributed data cache called tokenCache for my application. I have also added a mapListener to this cache to listen to a particular kind of events.
tokenCache.addMapListener((MapListener) new TokenCacheListenerBean(), new MapEventFilter(tokenFilter), false);
So bascially everytime a token (The domain object of this cache) is updated the entryUpdated() method in my EJB TokenCacheListenerBean is invoked.
The issue I have though is that, from what I observe on running my code is that the Cache Listener is single threaded. So if two Token Objects on my tokenCache are updated,
lets say Token Object A and Token Object B one after the other, the entryUpdated() method in my EJB is invoked for Token Object A and once the invocation is complete
then the entryUpdated() method is invoked again for Token Object B(). At a given point of time there is only one instance of TokenCacheListenerBean EJB. Is there a way to
make this happen in multi-threaded manner ?
Is there a configuration setting somewhere which allows multiple CacheListeners to be instantiated at a given point of time ?
TokenCacheListenerBean EJB_
package oracle.communications.activation.asap.ace;
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.Set;
import java.util.logging.Logger;
import javax.ejb.Stateless;
import com.tangosol.net.NamedCache;
import com.tangosol.util.MapEvent;
import com.tangosol.util.MapListener;
import com.tangosol.util.ValueUpdater;
import com.tangosol.util.extractor.PofExtractor;
import com.tangosol.util.extractor.PofUpdater;
import com.tangosol.util.filter.EqualsFilter;
import com.tangosol.util.filter.LikeFilter;
import com.tangosol.util.filter.LimitFilter;
import com.tangosol.util.processor.UpdaterProcessor;
* Session Bean implementation class TokenCacheListenerBean
@Stateless
public class TokenCacheListenerBean implements TokenCacheListenerBeanRemote, TokenCacheListenerBeanLocal, MapListener {
NamedCache asdlCache;
NamedCache tokenCache;
private final int PAGE_SIZE = 1;
private static Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(ConnectionManager.class.getName());;
* An instance of the JCAModeler EJB, represents the JCA-JNEP
JCAModeler jcaBean;
* Default constructor.
public TokenCacheListenerBean() {
// TODO Auto-generated constructor stub
public void entryDeleted(MapEvent Event) {
public void entryInserted(MapEvent Event) {
public void entryUpdated(MapEvent Event) {
Token newToken = (Token) Event.getNewValue();
Token oldToken = (Token) Event.getOldValue();
if ((oldToken.getState() == Token.TOKEN_RESERVED)
&& (newToken.getState()== Token.TOKEN_AVAILABLE)) {
String networkID = newToken.getNeID();
asdlCache = AceCacheFactory.getCache("asdlCache");
tokenCache = AceCacheFactory.getCache("tokenCache");
EqualsFilter filterNE = new EqualsFilter(new PofExtractor(String.class,Asdl.NETWORKID), networkID);
LimitFilter limitFilter = new LimitFilter(filterNE, PAGE_SIZE);
Set removeASDL = asdlCache.keySet(limitFilter);
Iterator asdlIterator = removeASDL.iterator();
if (asdlIterator.hasNext()) {
logger.info(printASDLCache());
ValueUpdater updater = new PofUpdater(Token.STATE);
System.out.println("Token ID:" + newToken.getTokenID());
UpdaterProcessor updaterProcessor = new UpdaterProcessor(updater, Integer.toString(Token.TOKEN_RESERVED));
tokenCache.invoke(newToken.getTokenID(), updaterProcessor);
jcaBean = new JCAModeler(tokenCache);
Object asdlID = asdlIterator.next();
Asdl provisionAsdl = (Asdl) asdlCache.get(asdlID);
asdlCache.remove(asdlID);
jcaBean.provision(provisionAsdl, newToken.getTokenID());
logger.info(ConnectionManager.printTokenCache());
logger.info(printASDLCache());
}

Here is what I am asking!
I have added 2 listeners (Listener A and Listener B) which each listen on for changes made to 2 different token Cache Objects (Token A and Token B).
for (i = 0; i < 2 ; i++) {
Token tokenAdded = new Token(UUID.randomUUID().toString(),TOKEN_AVAILABLE, networkID);
tokenCache.put(tokenAdded.getTokenID(), tokenAdded);
     tokenCache.addMapListener((MapListener) new TokenCacheListener(), tokenAdded.getTokenID(), false);
Now assume that updates are made to Token A and Token B simuntaneosly.
Why do i observe in my diagnostic messages that only one Listener is invoked at a given point of time.
Which means I see Listener A getting invoked and then once invocation of Listener A is complete I see Listener B bieng invoked.
Ideally I would want both listeners to be invoked simultaneously rather than in a one off fashion.
Here is the code for my token cache Listener
package oracle.communications.activation.asap.ace;
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Set;
import java.util.logging.Level;
import java.util.logging.Logger;
import com.tangosol.net.CacheFactory;
import com.tangosol.net.NamedCache;
import com.tangosol.util.AbstractMapListener;
import com.tangosol.util.Filter;
import com.tangosol.util.MapEvent;
import com.tangosol.util.MapListener;
import com.tangosol.util.ObservableMap;
import com.tangosol.util.ValueUpdater;
import com.tangosol.util.extractor.PofExtractor;
import com.tangosol.util.extractor.PofUpdater;
import com.tangosol.util.filter.AndFilter;
import com.tangosol.util.filter.EqualsFilter;
import com.tangosol.util.filter.LikeFilter;
import com.tangosol.util.filter.LimitFilter;
import com.tangosol.util.processor.UpdaterProcessor;
public class TokenCacheListener extends AbstractMapListener {
     NamedCache asdlCache;
     NamedCache tokenCache;
     AceCacheFactory cacheFactoryBean = new AceCacheFactory();
     private final int PAGE_SIZE = 1;
     private static Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(ConnectionManager.class
               .getName());;
     * An instance of the JCAModeler EJB, represents the JCA-JNEP
     JCAModeler jcaBean;
     * This is a utility method and prints the tokens cache.
     public String printTokenCache() {
          NamedCache tokenCache = cacheFactoryBean.getCache("tokenCache");
          LikeFilter tokenList = new LikeFilter(new PofExtractor(String.class,
                    Token.STATE), "%", (char) 0, false);
          Set keySet = tokenCache.keySet(tokenList);
          StringBuffer cachedTokenList = new StringBuffer("\n################################## Token(s) Cache ##################################");
          int counter = 1;
          for (Object tokenInCache: keySet) {
               Token tokenObject = (Token) tokenCache.get(tokenInCache.toString());
               cachedTokenList.append("\nS.NO:" + (counter++)
                         + "\t ID:" + tokenInCache.toString()
                         + "\t State:" + Token.tokenToString(tokenObject.getState()));
          cachedTokenList.append("\n####################################################################################");
          return cachedTokenList.toString();
     * This method is a utility method and it prints all the ASDL(s) currently present on the
     * asdlCache.
     private String printASDLCache() {
          NamedCache asdlCache = cacheFactoryBean.getCache("asdlCache");
          LikeFilter asdlList = new LikeFilter(new PofExtractor(String.class,
                              Asdl.NETWORKID), "%", (char) 0, false);
          Set keySet = asdlCache.keySet(asdlList);
          StringBuffer cachedASDLList = new StringBuffer("\n################ ASDL Cache ######## ########");
          int counter = 1;
          for (Object asdlInCache: keySet) {
               cachedASDLList.append("\nS.NO:" + (counter++) + "\t ID:" + asdlInCache.toString());
          cachedASDLList.append("\n################ ASDL Cache ######## ########\n");
          return cachedASDLList.toString();
     public TokenCacheListener() {
     public void checkASDLCache(MapEvent Event) {
     // Not currently used
     public void entryUpdated(MapEvent Event) {
          Token newToken = (Token) Event.getNewValue();
          Token oldToken = (Token) Event.getOldValue();
          logger.info("\n=============================================================================================="
                    + "\nTOKEN CACHE LISTENER"
                    + "\n=============================================================================================="
                    + printTokenCache()
                    + "\n==============================================================================================");
          if ((oldToken.getState() == Token.TOKEN_RESERVED)
                    && (newToken.getState()== Token.TOKEN_AVAILABLE)) {
          String networkID = newToken.getNeID();
          asdlCache = cacheFactoryBean.getCache("asdlCache");
          tokenCache = cacheFactoryBean.getCache("tokenCache");
          EqualsFilter filterNE = new EqualsFilter(new PofExtractor(String.class,Asdl.NETWORKID), networkID);
          LimitFilter limitFilter = new LimitFilter(filterNE, PAGE_SIZE);
          Set removeASDL = asdlCache.keySet(limitFilter);
          Iterator asdlIterator = removeASDL.iterator();
          if (asdlIterator.hasNext()) {
          logger.info(printASDLCache());
          ValueUpdater updater = new PofUpdater(Token.STATE);
          System.out.println("Token ID:" + newToken.getTokenID());
          UpdaterProcessor updaterProcessor = new UpdaterProcessor(updater, Integer.toString(Token.TOKEN_RESERVED));
          tokenCache.invoke(newToken.getTokenID(), updaterProcessor);
          jcaBean = new JCAModeler(tokenCache);
          Object asdlID = asdlIterator.next();
          Asdl provisionAsdl = (Asdl) asdlCache.get(asdlID);
          asdlCache.remove(asdlID);
          jcaBean.provision(provisionAsdl, newToken.getTokenID());
          logger.info(printTokenCache());
          logger.info(printASDLCache());
I only see one instance of this listener alive at any given point of time.
Edited by: 807103 on Nov 3, 2011 1:00 PM
Edited by: 807103 on Nov 3, 2011 1:12 PM

Multi-Threaded FTP

Multi-Threaded FTP was a huge attraction for me, and one of the features that sold me on upgrading to Dreamweaver CS6. However, I haven't seen any sign of it in the product or any documentation to help me use it. My files keep transferring in the traditional one-at-a-time way.
Is there something I need to do to enable this feature? Has anybody used this feature yet?

Might not help but I saw this in the comments on David Powers' blog
http://foundationphp.com/blog/2012/04/23/my-verdict-on-dreamweaver-cs6/
"Multi-thread FTP is the default in Dreamweaver CS6. You can neither turn it on nor off. It handles a maximum of three transfers simultaneously in either direction (so you can download at the same time as uploading). However, it doesn’t work with Check In/Check Out."
He also has the following comments in the body of the blog entry:
Multichannel FTP
Let’s be honest. In the past, Dreamweaver’s FTP client was a dog. Not any more. It now supports multichannel transfers, and can even download at the same time as uploading. Orange arrows indicate items queued for transfer. When the transfer begins, the arrow turns green. And if you’re transferring a large item, hovering over the filename displays a tooltip of how much of the file has been transferred. With Dreamweaver CS5.5, it took more than 90 minutes to upload a WordPress site on my internet connection. Now, it’s more than ten times faster.
The FTP error messages are also more meaningful. No one is likely to buy Dreamweaver CS6 for its FTP client alone, but this is a major improvement to the program.

Multi Thread Server over TCP/IP

Multi Thread Server over TCP/IP. Does it work?
In my box it works only over IPC protocol.
null

S C Maturi (guest) wrote:
: Mark Malakanov (guest) wrote:
: : Multi Thread Server over TCP/IP. Does it work?
: : In my box it works only over IPC protocol.
: Mark,
: Multi threaded server over TCP/IP will not work with
: the current distribution of Oracle 8.0.5 on Linux.
: This is corrected and a patch would be released soon.
: Maturi
tcp 0 0 bock.nettek-ll:listener bock.nettek-
llc.co:4196 ESTABLISHED
tcp 0 0 bock.nettek-llc.co:4196 bock.nettek-
ll:listener ESTABLISHED
(I have serveral of these)
TNS Ping Utility for Linux: Version 8.0.5.0.0 - Production on 07-
JAN-99 18:45:52
(c) Copyright 1997 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
Attempting to contact (ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=localhost)
(PORT=1521))
OK (440 msec)
...and from my install log you see that I selected MTS:
-[ YESNO
Q> Would you like MTS (Multi-Threaded Server) configured
and the SQL*Net$
A> TRUE
Please explain? Will TCP/IP MTS work via the loopback adapter
only? So far I have not tried a remote TCP/IP connection.
-STEVEl
null

OIM 9.1.0.2 - Weblogic JDBC Multi Data Sources for Oracle RAC

Does OIM OIM 9.1.0.2 BP07 support Weblogic JDBC Multi Data Sources (Services>JDBC>Multi Data Sources) for Oracle RAC instead of inserting the "Oracle RAC JDBC URL" on JDBC Data Sources for xlDS and xlXADS (Services>JDBC>Data Sources> xlDS|xlXADS > Connection Poll> URL) ?
If yes, is there are any other modifications that need to be made on OIM, or just changing the data sources?

Yes, it's supported. You install against one instance directly of the Rac Server. Then you update the config.xml file and the jdbc resource in your weblogic server with the full rac address. It is documented for installation against RAC. http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E14049_01/doc.9101/e14047/database.htm#insertedID2
-Kevin

Running a Java Multi Thread Program in database

I have created a multi threaded program in Java and it runs successfully from the command prompt. I want to create a DBMS Job which will wake up at regular intervals and runs the java program(Java stored procedure). Is this possible in 9.2/10G ?? If Yes, will there be any impact on the DB performance/increase memory etc.,
The database (9.2...) resides on a RH 2.3 AS box.
Any ideas...
Thanks,
Purush

Purush,
Java stored procedures cannot be multi-threaded. Well, they can, but the threads will not run in parallel. You may be able to find some more information in the Oracle documentation, which is available from:
http://tahiti.oracle.com
Good Luck,
Avi.

Is JDBC multi threaded

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for