Is JHeadstart 10.1.3.1 compatible with JDeveloper 10.1.3.0 (minimal SU2) ?

Is JHeadstart 10.1.3.1 compatible with JDeveloper 10.1.3.0 (minimal SU2) ?
I found different Compatibility notes:
C:\jdev1013\jdev\extensions\oracle.jheadstart.10.1.3\doc\releasenotes.html
. This release can be used with the Studio Edition of JDeveloper 10.1.3.0, 10.1.3.1 or 10.1.3.2.
In document "Building Enterprise JSF Applications with Oracle JHeadstart for ADF (10.1.3)"
. JHeadstart 10.1.3.1 is not certified to work with JDeveloper 10.1.3.0 Production.
http://blogs.oracle.com/jheadstart/2007/03/04
. Oracle JHeadstart 10.1.3.1 Now Available!
. This release can be used with JDeveloper 10.1.3.2 and 10.1.3.1. It can NOT be used with JDeveloper 10.1.3.0
(we use JDeveloper 10.1.3.0.4 SU5 and found no problems so far and we don't want to migrate to a new JDeveloper version if it is not 100% necessary)
Frank

........ I remember now, we also made a copy of the xml.jar from JHS to java-lib, because the embedded OC4J gave an exception (I thought this was related to not-finding the xml.jar in the JHS-lib) ......
I think this is cause that my JDeveloper/JHS configuration is working.
xml.jar copied from
C:\jdev1013\jdev\extensions\oracle.jheadstart.10.1.3\designtime\lib\xml.jar to C:\jdev1013\lib

Similar Messages

Jheadstart 11g upgrade tp1 to tp2 with jdeveloper build 5205

Hi
I use JDeveloper 11.1.1.0.2 (build 5205) and JHeadstart TP1.
Can we upgrade to JHeadstart TP2 with this version, because this buildnr is not in the blog?
I try to upgrade but after installing the war-file of the ViewController-project, I get an error java.lang.LinkageError, and I don't know if this is because of our JDeveloper/JHeadstart-combination or if this has another reason.
Regards,
LvL

The linkage error is a deployment issue.
Upgrading to new JHeadstart preview release is simply a matter of re-enabling and regenerating the app. (and re-applying any custom templates you might have).
Did you upgrade the ADF runtime libs as well on the server you deploy to?
Steven Davelaar,
JHeadstart Team.

Jheadstart(10.1.2.0) intergration with Jdeveloper(10.1.3)

Having followed installation notes for Jheadstart (I noted that it's certified for Jdeveloper 10.1.2 and not .3 but carried on), I cannot see "Jheadstart Settings " in Jdeveloper..tools..preferences. How can I include in Jdeveloper.
Terry

Ok.
It will be then better to ask this question on the JHeadstart forum
JHeadstart
And as far as I know JHeadstart 10.1.2 is not for use in JDev 10.1.3

JHeadstart version 9.0.3.58 compatible with Oracle10g iAS version 10.1.2.0.

Dear miss/sir,
Currently we have various JHeadstart applications running in an Oracle Applicatio server software version 10g (9.0.4.2) environment.
We plan to upgrade Oracle iAS to version 10.1.2.0.2 and have the following questions:
- Do we need to upgrade our current JHeadstart version (9.0.3.58) also in case of an OracleiAS upgrade ?
- Is our current JHeadstart version (9.0.3.58 compatible with Oracle10g iAS version 10.1.2.0.2
- To which version of JHeadstart do we need to upgrade in case an upgrade is needed ?
- Is a (substantial) rewrite of the JHeadstart applications ncessary in the last case ?
Regards,
Ger van de Goor
Oracle DBA

Ger,
The JHeadstart version you are using is quite old and not officially certified against 10.1.2.0. However, that doesn't mean it shouldn't work. I suggest you perform a test and see whether you run into any problems.
Of course, longer time it is advisable to upgrade to the latest jheadstart version. JHeadstart has evolved considerably since the version you are using, and is now fully based on ADF and JSF.
Migrating your JHeadstart application to the latest version will certainly have some impact since the underlying technologies have changed. The effort required to do the migration is hard to predict without knowing your application. Compared to the 9.0.3.58 version, the current JHeadstart release is much more powerful and flexible in terms of what you can generate, so functionality that took a long time to built post-generation with 9.0.3 might now be generated in a few minutes.
If you are interested in assessing the impact of a potential upgrade, I suggest you contact your local Oracle representative, or e-mail [email protected]
Steven Davelaar,
JHeadstart Team.

ADF from JDeveloper 10.1.2 not compatible with iAS 9.0.1

Hi,
We developed an ADF Application with JDeveloper 10.1.2 and we use the ADF interMedia domains (e.g. oracle.ord.im.OrdDocDomain). The application runs fine in JDeveloper, but doesn't run on our iAS 9.0.4.1. We get the following exception:
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: oracle/sql/DatumWithConnection
at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:219)
at oracle.jbo.common.java2.JDK2ClassLoader.loadClassForName(JDK2ClassLoader.java:38)
at oracle.jbo.common.JBOClass.forName(JBOClass.java:161)
at oracle.jbo.common.JBOClass.findDataClass(JBOClass.java:203)
at oracle.jbo.server.AttributeDefImpl.initFromXML(AttributeDefImpl.java:2061)
at oracle.jbo.server.AttributeDefImpl.loadFromXML(AttributeDefImpl.java:2013)
at oracle.jbo.server.EntityDefImpl.loadAttribute(EntityDefImpl.java:2815)
at oracle.jbo.server.EntityDefImpl.loadAttributes(EntityDefImpl.java:2779)
at oracle.jbo.server.EntityDefImpl.loadFromXML(EntityDefImpl.java:2362)
at oracle.jbo.server.EntityDefImpl.loadFromXML(EntityDefImpl.java:2106)
at oracle.jbo.server.MetaObjectManager.loadFromXML(MetaObjectManager.java:514)
[...rest of stacktrace omitted ...]
The problem is that the JDBC version of the iAS 9.0.4.1 is missing the class DatumWithConnection that is indirectly referenced by the interMedia classes supplied with JDeveloper 10.1.2.
In detail, oracle.ord.im.OrdDoc uses oracle.sql.STRUCT. The inheritance hierarchy of STRUCT is different in the JDBC versions on iAS 9.0.4.1 (oracle.sql.Datum <- oracle.sql.STRUCT) and JDeveloper 10.1.2 (oracle.sql.Datum <- oracle.sql.DatumWithConnection <- oracle.sql.STRUCT). The class file of oracle.ord.im.OrdDoc (from 10.1.2. JDeveloper) was apparently compiled the new JDBC driver version since it contains a reference to oracle.sql.DatumWithConnection. And that class cannot be found if run on iAS 9.0.4.1 with its old JDBC version.
I think this is a very serious problem, since it means that ADF from JDeveloper 10.1.2 is not compatible with iAS 9.0.4.1, in contradiction to the support matrix (http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/jdev/collateral/papers/10g/as_supportmatrix.html).
Upgrading the JDBC Driver on the iAS seems to be the only clean solution for this problem (we also tried using old versions of the ordim.jar etc. but that always leads to other problems). But simply exchanging the JDBC jar-files on the server breaks the Enterprise Manager on our iAS installation.
I have two questions:
1) Is there a recommended workaround for the compatibility issue described above?
2) Is there a documented and supported way to upgrade the JDBC driver of iAS 9.0.4.1? I searched OTN and MetaLink and haven't found anything about this.
Kind Regards,
Kay
P.S. It is surprising that this problem is rarely mentioned in the OTN forums at all. The only relevant thread is on the JHeadstart Forum:
JHeadstart Deployment Issue
P.S.2
More info on what we tested:
We have thoroughly checked that the 10.1.2. ADF runtime was correctly deployed on our iAS 9.0.4.1. We installed a OC4J 9.0.4.0.0 standalone on the same linux machine as our iAS 9.0.4.1 and deployed our application on it, getting the same error (java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: oracle/sql/DatumWithConnection) as on the iAS. Replacing the JDBC drivers of the OC4J standalone with the version that came with JDeveloper 10.1.2 solved the problem.

I don't think that mixing classes from different jar file is a good idea. Nevertheless, we tested this approach already. Adding the DatumWithConnection.class from the 10.1.0.3.0 JDBC version to the jar file of the original JDBC version (of the iAS 9.0.4.1.0) caused a java.lang.VerifyError to appear.
The DatumWithConnection class is not simply added in the newer JDBC version. It is inserted into the inheritance hierarchy of oracle.sql.STRUCT and oracle.sql.Datum. Simply providing the new class next to the old JDBC driver will not work.
To give more information about what's wrong with updating the complete JDBC driver, I justed tested it again. To update the JDBC driver I stopped the server, changed the contents of jdbc/lib, started the server. I tried it with JDBC Version 9.2.0.5 as well as 10.1.0.3.0.
In both cases, our own application works, i.e. no more NoClassDefFoundError caused by oracle.sql.DatumWithConnection.
The Enterprise Manager shows strange behaviour, however. Some features work as usual but, for example, when I click on the "Applications" tab for our OC4J instance, we just get the following error shown in the browser:
An error was encountered while loading page. Failed to initialize configuration management user session.. See base exception for details.
Root Cause: TDU
Resolution: See base exception for details.. TDU
In one of the server logs I found the following stacktrace:
java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: TDU
     at oracle.net.resolver.NavDescription.navigate(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.net.resolver.NavServiceAlias.navigate(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.net.resolver.AddrResolution.resolveAddrTree(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.net.resolver.AddrResolution.resolveAndExecute(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.net.ns.NSProtocol.establishConnection(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.net.ns.NSProtocol.connect(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.jdbc.ttc7.TTC7Protocol.connect(TTC7Protocol.java:1777)
     at oracle.jdbc.ttc7.TTC7Protocol.logon(TTC7Protocol.java:215)
     at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleConnection.<init>(OracleConnection.java:365)
     at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver.getConnectionInstance(OracleDriver.java:547)
     at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver.connect(OracleDriver.java:347)
     at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:512)
     at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:171)
     at oracle.context.isearch.admin.users.InstanceManager.getSchemaConnection(InstanceManager.java:688)
     at test.admin__status._jspService(_admin__status.java:112)
     at com.orionserver[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.1.0)].http.OrionHttpJspPage.service(OrionHttpJspPage.java:56)
     at oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspPageTable.service(JspPageTable.java:349)
     at oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspServlet.internalService(JspServlet.java:509)
     at oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:413)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.1.0)].server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.invoke(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:765)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.1.0)].server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.forwardInternal(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:317)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.1.0)].server.http.HttpRequestHandler.processRequest(HttpRequestHandler.java:793)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.1.0)].server.http.AJPRequestHandler.run(AJPRequestHandler.java:208)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.1.0)].server.http.AJPRequestHandler.run(AJPRequestHandler.java:125)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.1.0)].util.ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor$MyWorker.run(ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor.java:192)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
Kind Regards,
Kay

Mail app deleted and reinstall wont open, says not compatible with OSX

i accindetally deleted my mail app and emptied the trash, when I tried to reinstall from the startup disk, it installs but wont open, saying that the version of mail is not compatible with the version of OSX (10.5.8)

The Combo updater of Leopard 10.5.8 can be found here:
http://support.apple.com/downloads/Mac_OS_X_10_5_8_Combo_Update
There is no downloadable version of Mail.app - it comes with the operating system i.e. on your install disks.

I have Trend Micro antivirus for Windows 7, but I am being told it is not compatible with Mozilla 9.1, how do I get an older version or adapt?

I am using a lap top, just reinstalled everything, and now have Firefox 9.1 and am being told it is not compatible with my antivirus, Trend Micro Titanium. I am running Windows 7.

See:
* http://community.trendmicro.com/t5/Home-and-Home-Office-Forum/Read-Me-Before-Posting-Titanium-Hotfixes/m-p/55632

I have installed Firefox4 to find it is not compatible with my version of OSX how do I get version 3.6 back or do I just give up and use Safari?

I downloaded Version 4 and installed it. At no point did it say that it was not compatible with the version of OS X that I am running (10.4.11) now that it is installed it will not open but it has already up graded from 3.6 so I have lost the lot. How can I download a version of 3.6 so that I can use it again or should I just pack up and use Safari as all I can get from your site is version 4. HELP!!!

Go to this link and find your language:
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html

IPod 4,1 will not update to iOS 7. I updated my iMac to 10.9.1 (maverick). Latest Numbers version on iMac is not compatible with Numbers on iPod. Ideas? Can I go back a version with Numbers?

iPod 4,1 will not update to iOS 7. I updated my iMac to 10.9.1 (maverick). Latest Numbers version on iMac is not compatible with Numbers on iPod. Ideas? Can I go back a version with Numbers? I downloaded old version of Numbers 2.0.1 from DVD but with both versions the 2.0.1 will not open. So both versions are present but only the new version functions. I tried to drag the new version to the trash but the old version still runs error message and will not open. I did not try to restart with the new version in the trash.

Maybe. See:
Reverting to previous version of Numbers

I need to silently upgrade from 3.5 to 7 but get an error message after 7 install. Platform version 7.0 is not compatible with minVersion = 1.9.1

I'm trying to silently upgrade my environment to FF 7. I've gotten the silent install working great, it puts in my Proxy Server info, reassigns the home page and all that. But, the last version we pushed out was FF 3.5. If a user had that on their PC and they run the FF7 install, they get weird messages when clicking on the icon.
XULRunner: Error: Platform version '7.0' is not compatible with minVersion >= 1.9.1 maxVersion <=1.9.1
Another message they get is:
AutoConfigAlert:
Netscape.cfg/AutoConfig failed. Error: pref failed: [Exception... "Component returned failure code: 0x8000ffff (NS_ERROR_UNEXPECTED) [nsIPrefBranch.setBoolPref]" nsresult: "0x8000ffff (NS_ERROR_UNEXPECTED)" location: "JS frame :: prefcalls.js :: pref :: line 70" data: no]
This is on Windows XP

Do you have other virtualization or security software that might protect .ini and possibly other files in the Firefox program folder (C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\) and prevent Firefox from updating them properly?
You need to do a clean reinstall.
Download a fresh Firefox copy and save the file to the desktop.
* Firefox 7.0.x: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html
* Uninstall your current Firefox version.
* Do not remove personal data when you uninstall the current version or you lose your bookmarks and other data in the profile folder.
Remove the Firefox program folder before installing that newly downloaded copy of the Firefox installer.
* It is important to delete the Firefox program folder to remove all the files and make sure that there are no problems with files that were leftover after uninstalling.
Your bookmarks and other profile data are stored elsewhere in the Firefox Profile Folder and won't be affected by a reinstall, but make sure that you do not select to remove personal data if you uninstall Firefox.
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_backup

After update to 3.6.20, ERROR, platform version 1.9.2.18 not compatible with Min/Max v 1.9.2.20

Win2000 Pro SP4. Been running FireFox for several years. Ver3.6.6 since 03/22/2011. Got a msg window in FireFox stating important security update available. ''(ADDED INFO: Checked System Requirements of update and then...)'' As usual, I clicked yes load it. A few moments later I got the message: "XULRunner Error:
Platform version '1.9.2.18' is not compatible with
minVersion>=1.9.2.20
maxVersion<=1.9.2.20"
That is it, NO MORE FIREFOX!!! How can I fix it and not loose any of my 'stuff'?

You're welcome

Add management server: Setup version: 7.0.9538.0 is not compatible with database version: 7.1.10226.0

I want to add another management server to our existing SCOM environment. But whenever I run this setup on a new server I get stuck in the window for selecting the OperationsManager database. The database field stays blank and in the OpsMgrSetupWizard log
there are lines that the setup version is not compatible with the database version. But I use the same installer as when I installed the other management servers a year ago.
Maybe there is a newer setup installer? But I can't find it.
[10:42:54]: Error:
:Error:setup version: 7.0.9538.0 is not compatible with database version: 7.1.10226.0
[10:42:54]: Info:
:Info:Using DB command timeout = 1800 seconds.
[10:42:54]: Info:
:Info:isOMDatabase: Read returned true. so far, this is OM DB, not an empty DB
[10:42:54]: Debug:
:Connection was not open. We will try to open it.
[10:42:54]: Debug:
:SqlConnectionReady returned True.
[10:42:54]: Info:
:Info:Using DB command timeout = 1800 seconds.
[10:42:54]: Info:
:Info:isOMDatabase: Read did not return true. The MG is missing. This is not OM DB
[10:42:54]: Info:
:Info:Using DB command timeout = 1800 seconds.
[10:42:54]: Always:
:Azman store table not found in OperationsManagerDW table, assuming this is an not a valid OMDB for empty DB scenario.
[10:42:54]: Info:
:Info:DatabaseConfigurationPage: DB connection attempt completed.
[10:42:54]: Info:
:Info:DatabaseConfigurationPage: DB connection attempt completed.

Never mind, found it!
Apparently there was a newer version of SCOM setup in msdn and someone upgraded our existing SCOM environment. Downloaded the new setup, new report viewer controls and a System
CLR Types for Microsoft® SQL Server® 2012 and now it works!!

I'm getting this error statement: XULRUNNER error: platform version 6.0.2 is not compatible with min etc max etc6.0.1 - what is this about and how can it be corrected?

This is what I think may have happened. The other day, Thursday Sept 8th, I shut down my pc in the middle of a Firefox upgrade. Now when I try to access Firefox on my pc, I get this error message:
XULRUNNER Error: Platform version '6.0.2 is not compatible with min Version >= 6.0.1 max Version < 6.0.1
What is this about and how can I retsore access to Firefox on my pc?

If you use ZoneAlarm Extreme Security then try to disable Virtualization.
Do a clean reinstall and delete the Firefox program folder.
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Browser_will_not_start_up#XULRunner_error_after_an_update
*[[/questions/869812]]
*[[/questions/869951]]

How do I uinstall Yosemite? It's not compatible with my older MacBook Pro, and I can't connect to my printer or use safari

How do I uninstall Yosemite? It's not compatible with my older MacBook Pro and I can't connect to my printer or access Safari

How to Downgrade OS X Yosemite Back to OS X Mavericks

Is Ipod compatible with Windows VISTA?

Hi Folks
Sorry - may have posted in the wrong discussion, but here's trying!
Read some posts on this subject before, the suggestion is not, the iPod shows up as a removable drive in VISTA but iTunes won't sync - that was RC1 and not release versions. I'm looking to upgrade from XP Pro to VISTA on my home PC (I have the media and my PC is shown as compatible so just I'm itching to make the install!) but worried I'll lose connection to my iPod from iTunes. Anyone done this yet, what was your experience?
Regards
Jay

iTunes is not 100% compatible with Vista.
The filter driver for the burning component of iTunes does not function. If you install iTunes, you will need to remove it by going to Device Manager then View -> Show Hidden Devices.
Expand Non-Plug-and-Play devices, find PxHelp20. Right click that and select Uninstall.
You may have to restart. After this, iTunes will function except for the burning component.

Is JHeadstart 10.1.3.1 compatible with JDeveloper 10.1.3.0 (minimal SU2) ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for