Is Muse going to be a better choice than Dreamweaver for my very small company's website?

Very new to Dreamweaver and even newer to MUSE. Which program is going to be easier to help me maintain my companies website?

Really all depends on your needs. Muse will do for most small sites but as soon as your needs reach the requirement of doing anything dynamic or custom code then you are better of with Dreamweaver. Muse is easier if you aren't a coder but along with the ease comes restrictions on what you can and can't do.

Similar Messages

Better client than sqlplus for bulk fetch testing .

Hi,
I'm doing some test with rows speed retriving via Net8 and need some better client than sqlplus itself .
There is araysize limit of 5000 in sqlplus and its not oriented for massive row fetching , although Im using set termout off .
Test are in 10.2.0.3 environment and 100Mbit ethernet netowrk .
So is there any better client I can use ? Or I need to write it by myself :) ?
I've tried with pmdtm (informatica fetch utility) but it has got some problems with thread synchronization , basicaly strace profiling returns
% time     seconds usecs/call     calls    errors syscall
57.35    1.738975         161     10819      2145 futex
41.35    1.253799       32149        39           poll
1.21    0.036717           3     11869           read
0.08    0.002491           1      2163           write
0.00    0.000000           0        50           fcntl
0.00    0.000000           0        19           clock_gettime
100.00    3.031982                 24959      2145 totalso instead of reading it's latching :).
Regards
GregG

GregG wrote:
its not oriented for massive row fetching , although Im using set termout off .You can use SQL*Plus AUTOTRACE command to disable query result printing:
SQL> set autotrace traceonly;
SQL> select * from dba_objects;
18816 rows selected.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1919983379
| Id | Operation                      | Name        | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT               |             | 16154 | 3265K|    75   (3)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | VIEW                          | DBA_OBJECTS | 16154 | 3265K|    75   (3)| 00:00:01 |
|   2 |   UNION-ALL                    |             |       |       |            |          |
|* 3 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | SUM$        |     1 |    26 |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 4 |     INDEX UNIQUE SCAN          | I_SUM$_1    |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   5 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | OBJ$        |     1 |    25 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 6 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN           | I_OBJ1      |     1 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 7 |    FILTER                      |             |       |       |            |          |
|* 8 |     HASH JOIN                  |             | 19706 | 2290K|    72   (3)| 00:00:01 |
|   9 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL         | USER$       |    66 | 1122 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 10 |      HASH JOIN                 |             | 19706 | 1962K|    69   (3)| 00:00:01 |
| 11 |       INDEX FULL SCAN          | I_USER2     |    66 | 1452 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 12 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL        | OBJ$        | 19706 | 1539K|    67   (2)| 00:00:01 |
|* 13 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| IND$        |     1 |     8 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 14 |      INDEX UNIQUE SCAN         | I_IND1      |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 15 |     NESTED LOOPS               |             |     1 |    30 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 16 |      INDEX SKIP SCAN           | I_USER2     |     1 |    20 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17 |      INDEX RANGE SCAN          | I_OBJ4      |     1 |    10 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 18 |    NESTED LOOPS                |             |     1 |    43 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 19 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL          | LINK$       |     1 |    26 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 20 |     TABLE ACCESS CLUSTER       | USER$       |     1 |    17 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 21 |      INDEX UNIQUE SCAN         | I_USER#     |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   3 - filter(BITAND("S"."XPFLAGS",8388608)=8388608)
   4 - access("S"."OBJ#"=:B1)
   6 - access("EO"."OBJ#"=:B1)
   7 - filter(("O"."TYPE#"<>1 AND "O"."TYPE#"<>10 OR "O"."TYPE#"=1 AND (SELECT 1
              FROM "SYS"."IND$" "I" WHERE "I"."OBJ#"=:B1 AND ("I"."TYPE#"=1 OR "I"."TYPE#"=2 OR
              "I"."TYPE#"=3 OR "I"."TYPE#"=4 OR "I"."TYPE#"=6 OR "I"."TYPE#"=7 OR
              "I"."TYPE#"=9))=1) AND ("O"."TYPE#"<>4 AND "O"."TYPE#"<>5 AND "O"."TYPE#"<>7 AND
              "O"."TYPE#"<>8 AND "O"."TYPE#"<>9 AND "O"."TYPE#"<>10 AND "O"."TYPE#"<>11 AND
              "O"."TYPE#"<>12 AND "O"."TYPE#"<>13 AND "O"."TYPE#"<>14 AND "O"."TYPE#"<>22 AND
              "O"."TYPE#"<>87 AND "O"."TYPE#"<>88 OR BITAND("U"."SPARE1",16)=0 OR ("O"."TYPE#"=4 OR
              "O"."TYPE#"=5 OR "O"."TYPE#"=7 OR "O"."TYPE#"=8 OR "O"."TYPE#"=9 OR "O"."TYPE#"=10 OR
              "O"."TYPE#"=11 OR "O"."TYPE#"=12 OR "O"."TYPE#"=13 OR "O"."TYPE#"=14 OR
              "O"."TYPE#"=22 OR "O"."TYPE#"=87) AND ("U"."TYPE#"<>2 AND
              SYS_CONTEXT('userenv','current_edition_name')='ORA$BASE' OR "U"."TYPE#"=2 AND
              "U"."SPARE2"=TO_NUMBER(SYS_CONTEXT('userenv','current_edition_id')) OR EXISTS
              (SELECT 0 FROM SYS."USER$" "U2",SYS."OBJ$" "O2" WHERE "O2"."OWNER#"="U2"."USER#" AND
              "O2"."TYPE#"=88 AND "O2"."DATAOBJ#"=:B2 AND "U2"."TYPE#"=2 AND
              "U2"."SPARE2"=TO_NUMBER(SYS_CONTEXT('userenv','current_edition_id'))))))
   8 - access("O"."SPARE3"="U"."USER#")
10 - access("O"."OWNER#"="U"."USER#")
12 - filter("O"."NAME"<>'_NEXT_OBJECT' AND "O"."NAME"<>'_default_auditing_options_'
              AND BITAND("O"."FLAGS",128)=0 AND "O"."LINKNAME" IS NULL)
13 - filter("I"."TYPE#"=1 OR "I"."TYPE#"=2 OR "I"."TYPE#"=3 OR "I"."TYPE#"=4 OR
              "I"."TYPE#"=6 OR "I"."TYPE#"=7 OR "I"."TYPE#"=9)
14 - access("I"."OBJ#"=:B1)
16 - access("U2"."TYPE#"=2 AND "U2"."SPARE2"=TO_NUMBER(SYS_CONTEXT('userenv','curren
              t_edition_id')))
       filter("U2"."TYPE#"=2 AND "U2"."SPARE2"=TO_NUMBER(SYS_CONTEXT('userenv','curren
              t_edition_id')))
17 - access("O2"."DATAOBJ#"=:B1 AND "O2"."TYPE#"=88 AND "O2"."OWNER#"="U2"."USER#")
21 - access("L"."OWNER#"="U"."USER#")
Statistics
          0 recursive calls
          0 db block gets
       3397 consistent gets
         78 physical reads
          0 redo size
     908471 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
      14213 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
       1256 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
      18816 rows processed
SQL>

Is PLAYFORSURE for the ZEN MICRO a better choice than Creative Mediascour

Should i use the firmware, just to update bugs, or the 2 firmware, with playforsure. i am very nai've when it comes tto playforsure. I donno, what should i do?

my best advice is to research playforsure, do you want its features, and do you have a compatable system, if not then its probably not worth it.
not saying you are, but if you are under the impression that play for sure is the more up-to date firmware then you are mistaken as the two have such different features that they were updated simultaniously. and correct me if im wrong but it was the v firmware that was stable/ better for bugs than the v2 firmware. but its a personal choice. there is pleantly of info out there so have a read, see if its for you and that you are cumfortable changing the firmware.

What is better choice than Time Machine

I have a Seagaye GoFlex for Mac ( 2TB) external HD. I have fought with this drive and Time machine for over a year. I have partitioned the drive (2) to use for other purposes. 500 GB is for backup. Often it won't Backup. Sometimes it indicates it's read only. I end up erasing the disk, etc.. It's terrible as a Backup situation. I'm wondering if I would be better off with another application for my backup process? Something different than Time Machine.
Or is there someting I can do to correct my existing problem.
One of my situations is if i Shut Down my computer. When I start up, the Backup Partition does not mount. Is the volume just too large? I'm really confused, and upset with this ongoing problem.

Different backup software won't help if the external drive chipset is the source of the flaky mounting behaviour and other issues.
I use CCC and maintain an at home and off site clone, but neither CCC nor SuperDuper really replace TM as a file backup system. TM is ideally suited for finding and restoring specific files, or really, specific versions or time points of specific files. CCC/SuperDuper are single time point clones of your entire system - not really the same thing or useful in the same ways as TM.
Relying on a drive that you know has problems or issues that are likely or known to be tied to the actual hardware&firmware of the drive itself is a disaster waiting to happen. I would never trust any backup solution to such a device, and would bite the bullet and buy a drive that was, in fact, a reliable hardware device instead.
I've been using a 1TB WD My Book USB2 drive for TM for several years (so OS X 7,8 and up) without any errors or problems with mounting on reboot or after ejection (my clones are on portable firewire bus-powered drives). Had it ever shown any such issues, I would have stopped using it and gone to something that did not cause such problems - an unreliable backup volume or drive is an unreliable backup, period.
It is also generally considered a "best practice" to use your backup drives for nothing but that - backups. A dedicated backup drive is far preferable than a backup volume on a drive that sees all sorts of alternate uses as well - using a drive for both backup and general file use just increases the chance of some logical or physical error leading to the loss of the entire drive's contents.

PDF printer no longer an option? Need a better choice than "save as pdf"

We ungraded our work computer to snow leopard. Since then the pdf printer no longer works. In leopard to make a high quality pdf of our ad we would hit command print and select acrobat 7.0 as our printer. That no longer works in snow leopard so now we have to use "save as pdf" the problem with this is it doesn't compress the file and saves it as lower quality than the newspaper companies like. What's the best way to go about this now that snow leopard screwed things up?

Adobe has a Knowledge Base article, "Can't Print PDFs - Mac OS X 10.6" which explains that changes in Snow Leopard caused the old and well-loved PDF printer to disappear, or at least stop working.
Specifically for InDesign, I've read that the best alternative in Snow Leopard is to go the old-school route and print to a .ps file, then run that through Acrobat Distiller. Others have had success with exporting to PDF (as opposed to going through the Print dialog and using the Save As Adobe PDF).

Is there going to be a better cover than the smart cover for the ipad3 , the smart cover is crap!

My so called smart cover is useless, falls off doesn't stay supported up, all it does it put it to sleep. Is there a better cover coming for this?

Since Apple never released a "better" cover for the iPad2, I wouldn't count on it - but if Apple is planning releasing a new cover they haven't announced it, and nobody here can speculate (by terms of this forum) on what Apple might do.
That having been said, there are hundreds (thousands?) of covers available from other manufacturers, in a wide range of form and function, many of which work with the new iPad, and undoubtedly many more will be coming out soon now that the case manufacturers can tweak existing models to work with the 3rd generation. Do a search for "ipad covers" and see what you can find that meets your needs.

Sharepoint foundation 2013 collaboration - for a VERY small workgroup. Right choice???

Hi!
Let me start with a short background:
I've developed an ASP.Net application which currently uses Apache Solr for search and retrieval operations and for that purpose it works well. However, the users of this application has started to ask for facilities such as discussion forums, document-collaboration
(webdav, versioning, workflow...), calendars etc. and I'm faced with a feeling that I'm about to embark on a journey where I will develop functionality which is present in some of the "free" tools that Microsoft offers.
I've downloaded Search Server Express 2010 and in a very short amount of time I was able to develop a rather, well, sophisticated collaboration environment which gives me almost all of the above. Search is a KEY-feature that is one of the major concerns
for me as Solr provides alot of very sophisticated search-related operations but I've heard alot of good stuff about the Search Server included in SP Foundation 2013, which makes me wonder what that would give me if I take the plunge...
I'm a complete newbie to this SP-related stuff so I thought I'd better ask the pros in this forum so I don't make any unwise decisions leaving me in the dust :)
Soo, my dear fellow forum members - what would be the best way to go about this given the following facts:
small workgroup (8 people)
possibility to handle office-document, pdf-files and plain-text
discussion forums (both team-based and public)
team calendars
possibility to provide, say, a REST-api for digesting text-based data
powerful search facility able to index all of the document formats mentioned above
I'm leaning towards SharePoint Foundation 2013... what do you say - will it provide the above?
Many thanks to you all in advance,
/Peter

Simple answer: yes. SharePoint Foundation sounds like an excellent choice. There's one question that you'll need to answer: 8 people is not much, but how much data are they working with? That's probably not going to be an issue, but something you need
to be aware of.
Kind regards,
Margriet Bruggeman
Lois & Clark IT Services
web site: http://www.loisandclark.eu
blog: http://www.sharepointdragons.com

Why is better Preview than Acrobat for reading

When you install Acrobat Pro appears a window asking if you want to use it as default reader... SELECT NO!!!! and use Preview.
This is the reason:
Buggy Acrobat Pro (any version) can't handle large pages of PDFs and instead of Preview for Mac OS X that do it excellent because is better.
Try this:
1) Go to http://www.tastyapps.com/ and download Web Snapper and install it in Safari. This application capture any webpage.
2) Go to http://regexlib.com/Search.aspx and select RESULTS PER PAGE 100 to get a large webpage result.
3) Press the SEARCH button.
4) Now you have a large webpage of 100 items of results.
5) Capture this webpage with Web Snapper and create a PDF without pagination.
6) Open it in Preview for Mac OS X and you will see the PDFs Page PERFECT!!!
7) Open the same PDF page in Acrobat Pro... and you will see a BLANK PAGE!!!!
I capture a lot of PDFs and create one ebook using Acrobat Pro... but all with BLANK PAGES!!!
Cheers
Tom

Here may be part of the problem perhaps: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4664
The GMA X3100 found in 2008 MacBook models appears to be incompatible with the software, along with many other models of graphics card. Meaning a large percentage of users aren't technically meant to upgrade anymore, even though Lion will be okay on their systems.
It's bizarre to think I can import and export footage that will remain it's original colour/gamma, but during editing in the preview window [not even in the timeline or event browser thumbnails] it goes virtually grayscale. Every other part of FCPX works perfectly fine, no slowdown or anything.
Pretty disappointing if there is no workaround to this eventually!

Better options than DAVE for Win NT connection?

I work for a small Mac design group in a large business environment. We store Quark, InDesign, Photoshop files on the companies Win NT Server. To do this they have installed DAVE because they said just using OS X's PC connect ability was causing the documents to be looked at as .exe or unrecognizable files by the Mac. Lately some files are giving I/O errors on the server and getting corrupted. Is there a better option for communicating with a PC server than DAVE?

For just using OS X, I've never heard of any problems like that; I'm wondering if they're just confused? Or are they using a fairly fancy, unusual setup of some sort? Has anyone tried just connecting with the standard Mac feature?; I would be curious to hear what breaks (since if something does break, it probably implies that someone either misconfigured the Macs or misconfigured the server).
For the files in question: Are you able to access these files from a Windows computer?; can you read them there? I'm wondering if the IO error was a network problem (that DAVE might have a connection to), or just that their server's hard disk is failing.

Is Framemaker a better option than InDesign for footnote-intensive reports?

We currently used InDesign to layout our reports and briefings, and are exploring it's XML capabilities with a view to output in multiple formats: high-res PDFs, web pages within our CMS, and e-Pubs. We are unable to tag our hyperlinked footnotes for XML output in InDesign, and wondered if Framemaker would be a better tool. Our layouts are in colour, in a 2-column format, contain charts and tables and occasional exhibits, and we adhere to a strict template with both paragraph and character styles.
Any direction or insights would be appreciated!
Thanks,
Andrea

Andrea,
Your sample does not look like being »foot-intensive«, I only find two footnotes. And those will not be a problem for FrameMaker.
For 2-column text layout FrameMaker (as InDesign) gives you the option to create one text frame set to have two columns, or create two connected text frames, each of them one column. To keep the footnote in the original column, you would use the latter method. More information can be found in the online help:
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/framemaker/using/WS6C3D24E6-2965-48bb-B6CF-50D1439AEB01.html
Regarding other elements of the sample pages I don’t see any stumbling blocks. Just be aware that the general approach to layout, and especially when using XML-structured documents, is completely different from InDesign. With InDesign you just move all the frames wherever and whenever you want. With FrameMaker you plan ahead, create master pages and paragraph styles and then follow this original design. Creating layout changes »on the fly« is just not the way you work in FrameMaker. But this limitation is the reason for a higher layout consistency.
- Michael

Has anyone discovered a better system than itunes for a 3gs. I do not like itunes

I now find the latest itunes overly complicated. I would like a more simplified system for my music and for connecting my ipod touch and iphone to. I would prefer that they stop changing the ios. and just do a simple security update. I want an opt out for updates and toolbars. I also want to never need to sign up to itunes store as for free trade you should connect to anywhere to buy your music. Is there a Spotify app for iphone or download music torrents straight into itunes. These would vastly improve the system. Any comments welcome.

Stuart0007 wrote:
I now find the latest itunes overly complicated. I would like a more simplified system for my music and for connecting my ipod touch and iphone to.
If you would prefer the old look of iTunes, try these...:
CTRL+S put back the sidebar
CTRL+B puts back the top bar menu
CTRL+SHIFT+B puts back the Column Browser
CTRL+/ puts back the total number of songs and file size on the bototm ofg the iTunes window.
Stuart0007 wrote:
I would prefer that they stop changing the ios. and just do a simple security update. I want an opt out for updates and toolbars.
Yes, well, hope on. But you can opt out of updates, you always have that choice. Toolbars, I've mentioned.
Stuart0007 wrote:
I also want to never need to sign up to itunes store as for free trade you should connect to anywhere to buy your music.
You are not compelled to use the iTunes Store. You are free to purchase MP3 music from Amazon, among other sites, import it into your iTunes library and put it on your iPod. What makes you think otherwise?
Stuart0007 wrote:
Is there a Spotify app for iphone or download music torrents straight into itunes. These would vastly improve the system.
Usually, downloading by torrent means "illegally downloaded music". We will not be discussing that here.

Need better solution than FCPX for audio cleaning

Hi, I have a track for a wedding with a lot of background noise. The settings to improve audio on FCPX are not helping much. What's the bets solution to improve voice and reduce background noise?
Thanks

If Audacity or STP don't handle it for you, seriously consider giving ScreenFlow a try. ScreenFlow has about the best noise reduction I've ever heard from any app I've ever used. You can load the audio (or video+audio) up in SF (create a New Document from the File menu), drag and drop your media into the Media panel, then drag it to the timeline; select the audio track, go to the audio panel (speaker icon) and select: Filter: Remove Background Noise (accept the default setting of 80%) -- that's usually all there is to it! There's a free trial available (http://www.telestream.net/screenflow/overview.htm) — it's fully functional except that it watermarks the video output. It will export AIFF audio (LinearPCM 48kHz) and you can export audio only.

Better router than WRT160NL for wireless library?

I have been evaluating a WRT160NL. This router is used to allow wirless access to a set of multi-TB (USB) hard disks that comprise a wireless library. The idea is: I open a Pelican case in the middle of nowhere, and flip a power switch...presto...everyone in the local area has access to all of man's knowledge, including every book ever printed
The features I love StorageLink's ability to plug in multiple multi-TB hard disks (though a USB hub) as a NAS, and to make them available through either Cat 5 or 802.11b, g, and n. I have successfully tested a WD MyBook 2TB dual edition. The ability of the WRT310NL to run off a 12V DC (2.1mm x 5.5mm) plug really helps in the middle of nowhere. (I use 12V universal laptop batteries for power.)
The problems I have are:
(1) The routher looses its' configuration when power is pulled, making me log in by http to set up the NAS configuration all over.
(2) The router only supports SAMBA NAS (AFAIK) so no FTP or HTTP access to the NAS. (Have you ever tried to install SAMBA on a NOKIA 800 or an IPHONE?)
(3) Sometimes I have difficulty gettting the router to recognize multiple partitions. It seems if I change the settings on a partition, it's screwed for good. Togeather with the need to reset the settings after every router cold boot, this is a pain.
So, is there a better version of a Linksys by CISCO router for me?
Andy
P.S. I understand that some models (610) support 802.11a, and gigabit ethernet which would be good from a compatibility point of view, but that's not critical. The real issues are those I listed above.

Try to upgrade/reflash your router's firmware and reconfigure it...
Go to website linksysbycisco.com/downloads.........insert model no of your router in serach tab......select proper version of your router........download the firmware file......save that file on desktop
Follow these steps to upgrade the firmware on the device : -
Open an Internet Explorer browser page on a computer hard wired to the router...
In the address bar type - 192.168.1.1...Leave the Username blank & in Password use admin in lower case...
Click on the 'Administration' tab- Then click on the 'Firmware Upgrade' sub tab- Here click on 'Browse' and browse the .bin firmware file and click on "Upgrade"...
Wait for few seconds until it shows that "Upgrade is successful" After the firmware upgrade, click on "Reboot" and you will be returned back to the same page OR it will say "Page cannot be displayed".
Now reset your router :
Press and hold the reset button for 30 seconds...Release the reset button...Unplug the power cable from your router, wait for 30 seconds and re-connect the power cable...Now re-configure your router...
If your Internet Service Providor is Cable follow this link
If your Internet Service Providor is DSL follow this link

Is a PowerMac G5 2.4 Dual Chip (used) a better option than an iMac?

Hi Guys
I'm still reasonably new to Macs, and I am really more of a music person than a computer person (which is frustrating at times!!).
I am looking at selling my iMac 2.4GHz (4GB RAM) and replacing it with a current iMac 2.66GHz, because the new iMacs can handle 8GB of RAM, which would really help me run BFD2 with less problems.
But I noticed this on eBay:
APPLE POWERMAC G5 2.3 GHZ DUAL CHIP-240gb HD-1.5 gb RAM (eBay item 230346540784) - would this be a better choice than going with a new iMac?
I don't even know if this one is Quad Core. My knowledge of Mac Pros is zero! But I do know a lot of people go for them over iMacs, and even suggest getting a second hand Mac Pro in preference to a new iMac if it's for music.
Could someone help out and tell me if the above machine is a better bet than going for a new iMac?
Thanks heaps,
Mike

i dont have any evidence to prove this, but i would think that your iMac would run circles around the much older power mac G5 system.
a mac pro would be a diff story. mac pros are the 'new' version of the power macs now running intel chips.
www.everymac.com can give you all the tech specs you need on macs.

I use my ps3 online gaming, is the airport extreme or the airport express be compatible with ps3? Is it going to be a better connection compair to other router? Which one is a better choice for me, airport express or airport extreme??

I bought linksys EA3500 router. Its still in the box and before I open it I want to learn more about the apple airport router, is the apple going to work with my online games with ps3? I have iPad, 2 iPhones, apple tv and Mac mini. If the airport express or airport extreme is a lot better and will work for ps3 which one should I get?

Airport will work with PS3. From what you've stated, the Extreme is more than you need. Buy the Express.

Is Muse going to be a better choice than Dreamweaver for my very small company's website?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for