Is possible to Convert a 1 bit B&W Tiff image to a 16 Bit Greyscale Tiff image?

Hi there,
I am trying to convert a 1 bit Black & White Tiff image to a 16 Bit Greyscale Tiff image, Anyone out there know if it is possible and how it may be done? We are using Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro Extended.
Any help would be appreciated.
Cheers, Chris

Almost any graphic editor can do it, but it doesn't make a sense. The picture information remain the same - 1 bit. It has nothing to do with Acrobat.

Similar Messages

Is it possible to convert a PDF to a high resolution image with ColdFusion?

I would like to determine how to convert PDFs to high resolution images using ColdFusion.
I'm running ColdFusion 9,0,0,251028 on CentOS 5.5 with Apache 2.2.3.
The <cfpdf action = "thumbnail" ...> is all well and good for creating 72 dpi images of a PDF, but I need to be able to create 300 dpi images of a PDF.
The PDFs in question have a much higher level of detail available than 72 dpi.
The related scale attribute for the action="thumbnail" functionality has an accepted range of 1 to 100, but an example of what I need is something more like a value of 415.
I should mention that I did try to use the jpgdpi attribute, and set it to 300 dpi . . . which produced a JPG that was indeed set to 300 dpi, but still had the same pixel dimensions as the 72 dpi image, so this did not affect the pdf to jpg conversion process in any way to make the image higher resolution.
Alternatively, would another possibility be to use ColdFusion to alter the dimensions of the pdf to be 415% of its original dimensions in memory, and then output a 100% thumbnail of that altered PDF? Is this possible? I can not for the life of me work out how to alter the set dimensions of a PDF via ColdFusion, in order to determine if this would have an affect on the size of the thumbnail produced.
Or more broadly, how would you use ColdFusion to convert a PDF to a (or a series of) high resolution images?
Thanks in advance for any help on this.

Another idea:
Use a third party tool with CFEXECUTE if there's no other way. As you're on Linux you could easily run ghostscript on the command line to do it. gs lets you specify filetype as the device and also has options for resolution. For Windows there's gs as well (not sure though what it's command line capabilities are there) or tools like this: http://www.softinterface.com/Convert-PDF-To-Image/Convert-PDF-To-Tiff.htm
Cheers
Kai

Convert multiple page PDF to single TIFF doc

Is it possible to convert multiple page PDF to one TIFF file (with multiple pages). I also have access to Acrobat 6, 9 and 10.

Acrobat does not support writing multiple page TIFFs

Is it possible to convert a LabView .ldd Instrument Driver into a dll that can be used with MAX and visual basic?

I got the following problem. I'm using a Stanford DS360 UltraLow Destortion Function Generator, and would like to access it with the CwIVIFgen ActiveX Controll. In the driver database i found a instrument driver for LabView (ds360fg.llb). But its a llb file and i am not sure what to do.
Is it possible to convert it?
Is it possible to use it anyways?
Maybe i overread the answer, but i search the forums for quite a while now and i am not a bit wiser.
Thanks in advance
Felix

If you have LabVIEW and the application builder, a dll can be created from it but it cannot be used as an IVI driver. The only way to create an IVI instrument driver is with LabWindows/CVI. I personally don't have the time right now to create the dll but maybe if you post to the LabVIEW forum and get someone there to do it. Another other option is to hire an Alliance member to create either a dll from the LabVIEW code or to create an IVI driver from scratch.

24-bit audio files converted to 16-bit in Logic Pro 7

Hello,
I'm working on producing my band's demo and this is my first project in Logic Pro 7. The tracks were originally recorded into a Fostex D2424LV hard disc recorder as 24-bit wave files, then imported into Logic. At this point, I've done the editing and effects processing in Logic and exported the tracks as individual wave files, with the intent to put the tracks back on the Fostex and run them through a Yamaha 24-channel analog board for the final mixdown.
Everything has gone smooth until now. When I play the exported tracks back on the Fostex, most of them are peaking on the meters, while the same tracks played back in Logic don't even come close to peaking. I've tried re-exporting the tracks with reduced fader levels and still get peaks on the Fostex.
Given that the reduced levels still cause tracks to peak on the Fostex, I'm suspecting a bit-depth issue. I didn't realize at the time that the files were converted to 16-bit when they were imported into Logic. The Fostex only works with 24-bit files and I'm wondering if exporting the 16-bit tracks in Logic as 24-bit wave files might be causing the problem.
If this turns out to be the cause of the peaking tracks, is it possible to re-import or replace the converted 16-bit files with the original 24-bit files and apply the editing and efx processing that I've done to the 24-bit files?
I'll greatly appreciate any help you folks can give me on this one.
Kevin
Dual 2.0 Ghz G5 Powermac Mac OS X (10.4.1) RME Multiface
Dual 2.0 Ghz G5 Powermac Mac OS X (10.4.1) RME Multiface

i am very surprised that the fostex doesn't work with 24-bit files.
your peaking is not likely to be due to bit depth, although i can see why you might think so. maybe you're right.
logic has inbuilt -6db of head room you should know.
your suggestion of reimporting the original tracks from the fostex is exactly the thing you should do. remove the 16-bit files from the system and re-import the fostex files. open the logic project and it will look for the old files. for greatest ease make sure your fostex imported files have the same names as the ones you are removing. when it finds the files with the same name it should come up with an error message. select use anyway.
what's happening is logic stores information about the file, its length, bit-depth and so forth. so just get logic to use anyway and the files "should" playback alright.

Is it possible to convert an app from 12c to 11g?

I am using both 11.1.2.4 and 12.1.2.0.
If I have an app built with 12.1.2.0, which does not include any 12c specific features, is it possible to convert it to 11.1.2.4?
I am asking because I have a Development environment that is 12c, but a Production environment that is 11g and I am not sure we will be able to upgrade the Production environment
Thanks in advance..

It's possible but not an easy task. As 12c uses newer stuff you have to test everything with great care. You might find some things you have to rebuild add they won't work in 11.1.2.4.0 (e.g. components which are only available in 12c. If you read the what's new doc for 12c and you find something you have used, prepare to rebuild this part.
First thing to try ids to open the project in 11.1.2.4.0 and see if you can compile and run the app.
Timo

Is it possible to convert text captions to Smart Shapes?

Hello,
I have a collegue that is using Cp 5 to record software simulations which then need to be brought into Cp6. The problem is that our standards (for software simulations) employ Smart Shape call outs (not the Cp 5.5 and earlier text captions).
Is it possible to convert these text captions into our themed Smart Shapes either automatically inside Captivate 6 or by modifying the content within the CPTx file?
Thank you,
Shawn

Hello Lilybiri,
As always you are awesome! :-)
>I don't believe an automatic switch will be possible, because smart shapes are totally different objects.
I understand because there are a huge variety of shapes in either format. But I suspect that it should be easy to convert a text caption from any style to one specified smart shape style.
Actually, I am asking before the simulations get started. So nothing has been done yet. I am unsure what you are suggesting I should do in the preferences under Cp 5.5. Are you suggesting that there is a way to convert 'some format' of text callouts, in a Cp5.5 demonstration simulation, to Smart Shapes in Cp6?
>but since you already have created the simulations, it has to be done manually. Hoping for you that
>someone has a bright idea, but I do not see one immediately.
For anyone else in this situation, it would be handy to have a solution (rather than painstakingly convert each manually).
I am wondering if this might be a relatively easy search/replace within one of the xml files within the CPTx file. I'm going to look at this tonight.
Thanks for your assist.

Is it possible to convert PDF file into HTML

Dear friends
Is it possible to convert PDF file into HTML. I have few hundread PDF files i like to convert this files into HTML. I hope it can be done through Java but i don't know how to start this coding. anybody can give me a brief idea to go ahead.

Why do you want to do this yourself? I quick search on Google showed several utilities to do this, some freeware, some commercial.

Is it possible to convert to an AIFF file in itunes 10 and beyond, and if so what is the procedure?

Hello. Is it possible to convert to an AIFF file in itunes 10 and beyond, and if so what is the procedure?
I use FCP7 and often have a sound loop or the like that I need in AIFF format, I normally use itunes to do the conversion, but have heard that version 10 no longer performs this task...?
Thx for the help!
MBP 2.6 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo - Mac OS X 10.6.7 - itunes 9.2.1 (5)

Doolittle wrote:
I can't find convert to aiff as an option in itunes 10.
It still works the same as in past releases. Go to Edit > Preferences > Import Settings, and set "Import Using" to "AIFF Encoder," and then the option will be available. Consult this document for details:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1550

Really bad banding and artifacts in 16-bit layered greyscale file. Bad banding is retained when converted to 8-bit with No flattening. Flatten 16-bit image and banding and artifacts disappear even with no dither or noise layer. Is this a known bug?

Has anyone else experienced this?
I thought it was a monitor problem at first, but I'm using a 10-bit per channel Eizo. It seems to be a Photoshop bug based on many layers interacting with each other. When I flatten everything is fine. But I need to work on this image with layers and decent fidelity. Interestingly when I convert to 8-bit without flattening (and utilising the dither function to potentially reduce banding even further), it uses the terrible artifact laden/banding to do the conversion even though when I zoom into 1:1 in my 16-bit document it looks fine. But 50% or 25% zoom I suddenly get these awful artifacts.
Here's some screenshots to clarify. Please note I've used Photoshop for 24 years so I'm no slouch but this is the first time I've seen this. The problem is I need to do some subtle airbrush and texture work on this and it's almost unusable unless I flatten (please note, it does the same in the original 8-bit file and just to say I Gaussian-Blurred every layer with a 30px radius after converting to 16-bit so the there's no longer any 8-bit information in there or reasons for banding/artifacts). I can only think it is some of bug in Photoshop's layering engine.
Has anyone seen this before - dealt with this before?
Thanks in advance.
Not sure these embedded images will work.
8% zoomed - see all the strange banding and triangular artifacts
<a href="http://imgur.com/izrGuia"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/izrGuia.png" title="source: imgur.com" /></a>
Flattened view - all smooth:
<a href="http://imgur.com/Pn35IAK"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/Pn35IAK.png" title="source: imgur.com" /></a>
50% zoom, still there:
<a href="http://imgur.com/Z207hFd"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/Z207hFd.png" title="source: imgur.com" /></a>
100% artifacts disappear:
<a href="http://imgur.com/6aGOz0V"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/6aGOz0V.png" title="source: imgur.com" /></a>
100% 16-bit layered
<a href="http://imgur.com/0XJfe5e"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/0XJfe5e.png" title="source: imgur.com" /></a>
and finally 8-bit layered converted from 16-bit with dither.
<a href="http://imgur.com/PSxiu43"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/PSxiu43.png" title="source: imgur.com" /></a>
help!

I can't speak to why, perhaps someone more knowledgeable than I can speak to that. But if it only happens at certain views then it's purely a display issue; it won't happen in print or when you downsample to display size. Such banding issues have always disappeared for me when I output to 8 bit.
I'd assume that it's because of your monitor; it can't display all the colors and when zoomed out there's too wide of a range in a small area so banding occurs. But that's just my guess.

Is it possible to convert *.doc to *.rtf in a java program?

Hi :-)
My challenge is to develop a web-app in ADF Faces. Now i verify some technologies to store mailmerge letters in an easy way. The user of my web-app should upload a MS Word mailmerge document and a csv data source file. My web-app must thereupon convert this two files to a pdf per csv-row and store it to a ftp.
I have build a demo using the open office API. But now i want to try the same by using apache POI and FOP. I can merge the doc files with POI and i can create PDF with FOP.
My problem is, that POI cant convert to a rtf file and FOP uses an rtf file to create a pdf. I dont know, if its possible to convert a doc file to a rtf file. If its possible, is there an API, which will help me out?
Regards
Majo
btw...I am not sure, if its the right forum for my question :-/

HeHe, no sorry. The binary file is the same, because Windows bind doc and rtf with MS Word, it opens the file, which you have renamed to *.rtf in MS Word. But as a doc document, not as a rtf file ;-)
And i dont want to open the rtf file in MS Word. I want to process the rtf file in java.
Thanks
Majo

PS CC HDR toning in ACR then Converting to 16 bit major error!

So here's the deal - I'm an avid user of HDR and have always made my HDRs in photoshop (but tonemapped elsewhere). Now, with the new tonemapping in ACR I can get great results - BUT - there's a BIG problem.
After I've created my HDR and toned it in ACR it opens in photoshop as a 32 bit file (with the camera raw adjustments showing as a filter).
And it looks great.
BUT, when I try to make that a usable file by converting down to 16 or 8 bit - all that work goes to waste.
I've always used "exposure and gamma" to convert from 32 to 16 or 16 to 8 - that's the one we all know and love because it doesn't change anything as far as the image appearance.
However - with HDRs I create and tone in ACR: Once I do this to convert to 16 bits using exposure and gamma (like always and touching nothing) - the image turns almost white - horribly washed out and lousy looking. I've tried it every way I can think of. I'll flatten the 32 bit file as to get rid of the acr smart filter, I've rasterized the layer, I've duplicated the document, I've tried merging and not merging - everything. The preview that shows when I am about to convert 32 to 16 in exposure/gamma looks correct, but as soon as I do it - boom - washed out weird looking image.
Other issue:
If I save a 32 bit psd after toning in ACR to work on later - it looks way different the next time I open it. This happens whether I save the profile along with the file or not. It opens darker, for the most part and I can never get back to how it was (and was unable to save as 32, 16, or 8 looking right!).
Last issue: If I create a 32 bit hdr image but choose NOT to tone in acr and save it as a radiance file - if I open that radiance file later in photoshop and use the acr filter to tone it - again, it appears way different like a lot of data has been lost. The image is usually a lot brighter, washed out, less colorful, and the pixels seem to not be able to bend very far in any direction.
Can someone please explain if I am doing something wrong?? Or if this is a bug?? I love the way the 32 bit images look once I've toned them - but that's the only time they'll look remotely like that! Can't save, convert to 16 bit, or do doodly squat without the image drastically changing!

Ok! Thank you everyone for taking the time to help me figure this out! I appreciate it!
I have taken everyone's advice into consideration and tried everything suggested - watched every video - read every link - and here's where I'm at now.
There's some good news and bad news and just plain weird news.
I do have those profile settings enabled (always have) - and it does ask me if I want to embed, convert, or discard.
If I flatten a 32 bit toned image (to get rid of the acr filter) and save it as a 32 bit tiff - I can re-open that tiff with convert to working space on - and it looks the same. I can ALSO convert that tiff to 16 bit and have it look a LOT closer to the original (nothing like the washed out ones). That's good news!
However, if I save the 32 bit toned image with the acr filter still there as PSD - it will open washed out and crazy the next time I open it (using convert to working space - I've also tried every other option). So - working on a 32bit toned in acr image again is still impossible after closing it without it looking all washed out.
ALSO - there is one section in color profile settings that is puzzling me and affects all of this in a major way.
Above the three boxes to check about profile mismatches and warnings - there are 3 settings
RGB, CMYK, and Gray.
Now by default my RGB settings was RGB: Off
I know this is a weird issue because my working space is adobe rgb and the profile mismatch warnings are still on - so the same result happens when opening files. And also by checking the include the working color profile with an image when you save it should achieve the same result as haveing RGB: Preserve Embedded Profiles on. But there's a weirder area this causes a difference.
If I have that RGB setting OFF - and merge those 3 same images to hdr and then go to tone in ACR it looks really dark (not a problem it's a 32 bit hdr file - I use acr to make it look the way I want). It's rich in color and seems to have loads of data and tone available to play with.
HOWEVER - if I start with that RGB setting to "Preserve embedded profiles" - then merge those same 3 images to hdr and then go to tone in ACR it looks entirely different. It looks way less dark and contrasty, is very drained in color, and seems to have a lot less data to play with in terms of bringing out shadows or toning down highlights.
It's best for me to just show you a side by side - as I'm including here. This is the same hdr created with no changes other than that one setting (shown in the image) being different before I merge to hdr. (And the 32bit image that opens in ACR I have made zero changes to at the point of screen capture).
Any ideas?

I have acrobat 11 standard is it possible to convert pdf files to word files ?

I have acrobat 11 standard is it possible to convert pdf files to word files ? or is it just possible in the Pro version.

It sounds to me like you're using Reader, not Acrobat. Make sure you open
the PDF file in Acrobat, and then go to File - Save As Other - Microsoft
Word.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:55 PM, nickk23435928 <[email protected]>

Is is possible to convert the movies purchased on itunes to DVD?

Is is possible to convert the movies purchased on itunes to DVD? (In other words you would be burning the movie or tv shows to a blank DVD).

You can store just what you want on the external. Just set up folders for what you want. I have a music folder, movies and TV shows, and pictures folders. I also have mine partitioned for OSX and Windows. I have a few files I need if I am running on windows so I keep them on the windows side. I always keep a back up of my documents and a few other files it is a pain to download on the external.
You can also copy every folder and file on your machine to the external if it is big enough. This is a true copy not a back up file generated by a back up program. I like to do this if I get adventuresome and plan to do some major experimenting with my software. Saves having to reload everything if it crashes.
TTFN
Doc

Re: Is it possible to convert several licenses to one shared license

Re: Is it possible to convert several licenses to one shared license?

Hi Signe Hansen,
You cannot convert several retail license to volume.
Regards,
Romit Sinha

Is possible to Convert a 1 bit B&W Tiff image to a 16 Bit Greyscale Tiff image?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for