Is Presence 7.0 compatible with CUCM 8.0

Is Presence Server 7.0 compatible with CUCM 8.0 or do I have to upgrade my presence server to 8 also ?

CUPS 7.x is not supported with Call Manager 8.0.
Pierre.

Similar Messages

Is Unity 7.0(2) compatible with CUCM 8.6 ?

Is Unity 7.0(2) compatible with CUCM 8.6 ?
The documentation reports the compatibility with CUCM 8.5(x), but is not updated for 8.6.
Thank you

The documentation related to 8.6 may lag behind for a bit. However, if you are running or update to the latest TSP (8.4.3) on your Unity server then you're likely covered. The version of TSP is really the only compatibility factor as far as Unity/CUCM is concerned.
Hailey
Please rate helpful posts!

Is UCCX - 8.5.1.11001-35 (8.5.1 SU1) compatible with CUCM - 8.6.1.20000-1 (8.6 1a)

Hi,
I am referring the UCCX 8.5 compatibility matrix:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_compatibility/matrix/crscomtx.pdf
Per the above document, UCCX 8.5.1 SU1 is compatible with CUCM 8.6.1, it doesn't specify whether it is compatible with CUCM 8.6.1a.
Can someone shed some light, is it safe to assume that CUCM 8.6.1a is also compatible?
Thanks in advance,
inner_silence

Su's are also supported.
Here are 2 examples which will answer both your questions.
If CUCM 8.5(1)SU1 is qualified with UCCX 8.5(1), then all ES of CUCM 8.5(1)SU1 is considered qualified with UCCX 8.5(1).
If CUCM 8.5(1) is qualified with UCCX 8.5(1), then all SU of CUCM 8.5(1)SU1 is considered qualified with UCCX 8.5(1).
Hope this clarifies.
Shirish

CIPC 7.0.5 compatibility with CUCM 9.1

Hi
I'm trying to figure out if Cisco IP Communicator 7.0.5.0 is compatible with CUCM 9.1
All i can find is the "Cisco Unified Communications System Release Summary Matrix for IP Telephony" but this matrix is "turned upside down" from my question.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/uc_system/unified/communications/system/versions/IPTMtrix.html
/Tony

Hi Tony,
It may work with CUCM 9.1 but with some limited functionality as it has not been tested with CUCM 9.1. Please check the release notes of the CIPC 7.0.x version
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cipc/7_0/english/release/notes/CIPC70_RN.html#wp116331
Highest callmanager version listed is 8.0
Ideally you should be using version 8.6 or higher
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cipc/8_5/english/release_notes/CIPC_Release_Notes_8_6_chapter_00.html#CIPC_RF_S79BC94C_00
It clearly lists cucm 9.1 as supported cucm version.
HTH
Manish

802.1x - Compatible with SHA256/KSP/v3 or v4 templates?

I'm preparing to implement a new PKI (two-tier, 2012 R2) in our environment, and we are also implementing 802.1x (on wired, currently, with wireless to come). All clients in the enterprise are Windows 7. I've been researching what is supported in relation
to certificate templates, hash algorithms, and cryptography providers. Everything I've seen so far states that 802.1x only works with v2 templates, SHA-1 hashing.
Has this changed at all in the past two years or so (latest documentation I could find on certificate template versions being compatible with 802.1x)? Is any combination of SHA256, Key Storage Providers, and/or v3 or v4 certificate templates supported
with 802.1x authentication?

I have a supplemental question regarding the 2003 update (KB968730). I have a Kace KBOX that we do patching/inventory of our servers with, and it tells me that all of our 2003 servers are patched with KB968730. However, when looking at one of
the 2003 servers, I didn't see KB968730 in the updates list, nor in the registry. After some research, it appears that the crypt32.dll file on the server now is already a newer version than the one in the KB968730 (it contains the version of crypt32.dll
from MS14-049 in August 2014). I went ahead and installed KB968730 anyways on the server, and it now shows up in the updates list. However, the crypt32.dll file was unaffected on the machine since it was already newer.
Upon reading the install log for KB968730, it seems that all the update did was add registry keys to say that the KB968730 was installed, but did not replace the crypt32.dll file, and no reboot was needed.
I believe this will be the case for all of my 2003 R2 servers. With the actual payload of the KB968730 being the crypt32.dll (and wcrypt.dll for x64), and those files already being newer than on my servers than what is in the KB968730, would it just
be considered to be SHA2 supported...or would the presence of the reg keys that state the hotfix is installed be needed (sounds pointless to me)?
EDIT: Not to mention that the KB968730 update never specifically mentions 2003 R2, just 2003. The install log shows failures during file version checks and other lines, so it really looks like it simply added the registry info for the hotfix and
that's all.

Firefox not remembering passwords etc. fix not compatible with ver. 34.05. So what to do?

Was pleased to find a fix for making my computer remember passwords, but NOT pleased to find that it is not compatible with my FF 34.05! How do I fix this or even go back to a previous version? Noticed that on some sites, the Password Remembering KEY does not show, particularly on Banking sites, so no option to save anyhow!

What fix are you talking about?
Current Firefox versions should offer to remember passwords regardless of the presence of autocomplete=off.
Firefox won't offer to remember a password when you are in Private Browsing mode.
Did you make sure that there aren't any exceptions?
You can inspect and manage permissions for the domain in the currently selected tab via these steps:
*Click the "[[Site Identity Button|Site Identity Button]]" (globe/padlock) on the location/address bar
*Click "More Information" to open "Tools > Page Info" with the Security tab selected
*Go to the Permissions tab (Tools > Page Info > Permissions) to check the permissions for the domain in the currently selected tab

Where can I find what phone loads are compatible with CME?

I recently upgraded one of our CME systems to CME v10.0
I noticed that even though the CMEv10 Supported Firmware page says the compatible phone load for my 7911 phones is 9-2-1TH1-13,
my 7911's running phone load 8-4-3-16 all seem to be registering and running just fine.
So I must conclude that 7911 phone load 8-4-3-16 is compatible with CME v10.0
Where can I go to find out what phone load versions are compatible with CME or perhaps, at least, where I can find what phone loads are no longer supported by a version of CME?

Hi Jared,
Specific CME versions are tested with the versions listed on the "requirements" doc like the one you mentioned (linked below), but are not limited to those firmware versions. The phone loads/firmware is completely independent from the CME/IOS version. And it is often appropriate to upgrade or downgrade phone firmware levels on CME and is fully supported :)
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucme/requirements/guide/cme10spc.html
I would look at upgrading the 8-4-3 firmware for the 7911's BUT you will need to move to an interim mid-point release like 8-5-2 as a first step due to the "important notes" shown here;
Firmware Upgrade Issues for SCCP
Note For all SCCP firmware upgrades from firmware release versions earlier than 8.3(3) to version 8.5(3) or greater, you must first upgrade your firmware to version 8.5(2). Once you have upgraded to version 8.5(2), you can upgrade your IP Phone to version 8.5(3) or later.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cuipph/firmware/8_5_3/english/release/notes/7900_853.html#wp57602
Cheers!
Rob

Just purchased and downloaded pe 13. While installing, I found out pe13 is not compatible with my OSX 7.5 system. Any Idea's on how to swap for pe 12? It's not available on the Adobe web site. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks

Just purchased and downloaded pe 13. While installing, I found out pe13 is not compatible with my OSX 7.5 system. Any Idea's on how to swap for pe 12? It's not available on the Adobe web site. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks

daleroach
Adobe is not going to swap 13 for 12. It is selling only 13 download as you found out. So, you are going to have to purchase 12 if you want to use that program. It may still be available at some retail locations, such as Amazon.
If you are within 30 days of purchase and have purchase the download from Adobe, then contact Adobe via its Adobe Chat to get a refund. To do that, click on the following link
http://helpx.adobe.com/sea/contact.html?step=PRE_membership-account-payment_payments-invoi ces-orders_stillNeedHelp
Premiere Elements
Membership, Account, Payment
Payments, Invoices, Orders
Chat Panel
If the link does not hold its set, then you will need to navigate to Chat Panel using the above titles as guides.
Please let us know if you are OK with the above. If any questions or need clarification, please do not hesitate to ask. Reminder..we are not Adobe. This is a user to user
forum with an undefined frequency of an Adobe presence in it.
Best wishes
ATR

UPS, USB-connectable with: UPSmart2000i. Is there software, compatible with Mac OS X 10.8..?!

I bought a 2000 VA interactive UPX ( Turbo-X brand, "PLAISIO" stores' proprietary, Greece), USB-connectable with software for Windows provided: upsmart2000i.
Is there other software available for it, compatible with Mac OS X 10.8..?!
I attempted to install the APCAGENT.app along with the "Growl": after installation, the APCAGENT.app was not able to find the IP address of the ULS or to establish any communication with it; it didn't even detec the presence of the already running GROWL app.

TYPOS CORRECTED:
...a 2000 VA interactive UPS ("Turbo-X" brand.....
...the APCAGENT.app wan not able to find the IP address of the UPS or ti establish....
....didn't even detect the presence...
Generic UPS software Mac-compatible needed
Apologies for typos and any inconvenience

Mail app deleted and reinstall wont open, says not compatible with OSX

i accindetally deleted my mail app and emptied the trash, when I tried to reinstall from the startup disk, it installs but wont open, saying that the version of mail is not compatible with the version of OSX (10.5.8)

The Combo updater of Leopard 10.5.8 can be found here:
http://support.apple.com/downloads/Mac_OS_X_10_5_8_Combo_Update
There is no downloadable version of Mail.app - it comes with the operating system i.e. on your install disks.

I have Trend Micro antivirus for Windows 7, but I am being told it is not compatible with Mozilla 9.1, how do I get an older version or adapt?

I am using a lap top, just reinstalled everything, and now have Firefox 9.1 and am being told it is not compatible with my antivirus, Trend Micro Titanium. I am running Windows 7.

See:
* http://community.trendmicro.com/t5/Home-and-Home-Office-Forum/Read-Me-Before-Posting-Titanium-Hotfixes/m-p/55632

I have installed Firefox4 to find it is not compatible with my version of OSX how do I get version 3.6 back or do I just give up and use Safari?

I downloaded Version 4 and installed it. At no point did it say that it was not compatible with the version of OS X that I am running (10.4.11) now that it is installed it will not open but it has already up graded from 3.6 so I have lost the lot. How can I download a version of 3.6 so that I can use it again or should I just pack up and use Safari as all I can get from your site is version 4. HELP!!!

Go to this link and find your language:
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html

IPod 4,1 will not update to iOS 7. I updated my iMac to 10.9.1 (maverick). Latest Numbers version on iMac is not compatible with Numbers on iPod. Ideas? Can I go back a version with Numbers?

iPod 4,1 will not update to iOS 7. I updated my iMac to 10.9.1 (maverick). Latest Numbers version on iMac is not compatible with Numbers on iPod. Ideas? Can I go back a version with Numbers? I downloaded old version of Numbers 2.0.1 from DVD but with both versions the 2.0.1 will not open. So both versions are present but only the new version functions. I tried to drag the new version to the trash but the old version still runs error message and will not open. I did not try to restart with the new version in the trash.

Maybe. See:
Reverting to previous version of Numbers

I need to silently upgrade from 3.5 to 7 but get an error message after 7 install. Platform version 7.0 is not compatible with minVersion = 1.9.1

I'm trying to silently upgrade my environment to FF 7. I've gotten the silent install working great, it puts in my Proxy Server info, reassigns the home page and all that. But, the last version we pushed out was FF 3.5. If a user had that on their PC and they run the FF7 install, they get weird messages when clicking on the icon.
XULRunner: Error: Platform version '7.0' is not compatible with minVersion >= 1.9.1 maxVersion <=1.9.1
Another message they get is:
AutoConfigAlert:
Netscape.cfg/AutoConfig failed. Error: pref failed: [Exception... "Component returned failure code: 0x8000ffff (NS_ERROR_UNEXPECTED) [nsIPrefBranch.setBoolPref]" nsresult: "0x8000ffff (NS_ERROR_UNEXPECTED)" location: "JS frame :: prefcalls.js :: pref :: line 70" data: no]
This is on Windows XP

Do you have other virtualization or security software that might protect .ini and possibly other files in the Firefox program folder (C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\) and prevent Firefox from updating them properly?
You need to do a clean reinstall.
Download a fresh Firefox copy and save the file to the desktop.
* Firefox 7.0.x: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html
* Uninstall your current Firefox version.
* Do not remove personal data when you uninstall the current version or you lose your bookmarks and other data in the profile folder.
Remove the Firefox program folder before installing that newly downloaded copy of the Firefox installer.
* It is important to delete the Firefox program folder to remove all the files and make sure that there are no problems with files that were leftover after uninstalling.
Your bookmarks and other profile data are stored elsewhere in the Firefox Profile Folder and won't be affected by a reinstall, but make sure that you do not select to remove personal data if you uninstall Firefox.
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_backup

After update to 3.6.20, ERROR, platform version 1.9.2.18 not compatible with Min/Max v 1.9.2.20

Win2000 Pro SP4. Been running FireFox for several years. Ver3.6.6 since 03/22/2011. Got a msg window in FireFox stating important security update available. ''(ADDED INFO: Checked System Requirements of update and then...)'' As usual, I clicked yes load it. A few moments later I got the message: "XULRunner Error:
Platform version '1.9.2.18' is not compatible with
minVersion>=1.9.2.20
maxVersion<=1.9.2.20"
That is it, NO MORE FIREFOX!!! How can I fix it and not loose any of my 'stuff'?

You're welcome

Is Presence 7.0 compatible with CUCM 8.0

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for