Is PrProCS3 able to encode H.264 Blu-ray file?

It seems I overestimated the capabilities of CS3.  I have been unable to export a file to create a Blu-ray disc.
System specs:
2009 Mac Pro 4,1 3.33GHz Quad core
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512 (Apple)
16GB RAM
640GB HD for OS X 10.6.4, and all programs
3x 1TB HD in RAID 0 via Apple RAID card for data, scratch
LG WH10LS30 10x Super-Multi Blu-ray burner (kit for Mac Pro from OWC)
Adobe Production Premium CS3 (updated to 3.2.0 for Pr)
File specs:
DVCProHD P2 MXF footage, shot on Panasonic AG-HVX200P
1280x1080 29.97(24P), aspect ratio = 1.5
Project settings:
DVCProHD 1080i/1080p, 60Hz
23.976 frame rate, progressive scan
The project is 1 hour 32 minutes long, and I've tried Export to Encore, Export to AME and Export Movie to H.264 Blu-ray m4v, using the preset for 1080p High Quality 24p and 23.976fps.  Codec is MainConcept H.264.  The target bitrate is 25Mbps, Max 30Mbps.  I've tried both Main and High profile.  After I post this question, I'll be trying to change VBR to 1-pass, since it gets through the first pass during encoding every time, but crashes Pr during the second pass.  It doesn't even make it to Encore... it just won't encode the export file, despite my attempts to follow all the rules.
I'm out of ideas.  I don't want to give up and say Premiere Pro CS3 is worthless to me until I can confirm that as a fact.  I purchased CS5, and it's sitting on my shelf awaiting installation, but I thought switching versions in the middle of a feature film edit was bad, so I've been holding off.  However, if CS3 is unable to produce a Blu-ray copy, I might have to try that next.

Hi,
I have cs3 but dont have a machine powerful enough to edit HD of any kind that is more than about maybe 20 min ...I have a PC.
It slows up a LOT if I have HD on my timeline and I add effects etc.  That is why I haven't responded to your thread.
I have (approx ) a dual core 3ghz cpu and 4 gig ram, 2 hard drives with OS and programs on boot drive and projects on 2nd drive. I have no problems with SD video at all but HD is just NOT something I can do.
I suspect there may be some others using CS3 that also shun large HD projects simply due to the machines they have.
With the new 64bit OS and CS5, allowing PC users to actually "see" more than 4gig of ram, most HD users are now using new 64 bit OS and CS5....with a lot of ram and multiple cpu's and raid drive setups.
Although this doesnt help you out a lot re: your problem, at least it might explain a little bit why so few have responded yet...it's simply because I don't think that many cs3 ( 32 bit program ) users have done what you are trying to do.
Perhaps you could try exporting to encore for blue ray a very small segment of ONE timeline, and see if your hardware works OK with THAT...  ??  Sorry I can't help more

Similar Messages

  • Adobe prem / media encoder h.264 blu-ray jitters, flickers /w slow-mo

    hello
    using the Adobe Production Premium CS4 pack... hardware is not an issue, also all the latest updates are installed.. prem 4.2.1 (003), encoder 4.2.0.006
    after export and authoring, we are having strange glowing flickers, and bad slo-motion effect playback
    the problem seems to be consistent with slo-motion and time remapping, frame holds and especially when an additive dissolve is thrown in.
    the edit's are far from saturated with these effects, but a simple frame-hold with motion-rotation and motion-scale occurring with keyframes. the problem also happens with something as simple as a 30% speed/duration added onto a clip..
    the footage is captured and on a timeline at - 1440x1080 (1.3333) HD Anamorphic, 25fps (50i)
    the export profile after edit is - H.264 Blu-ray - 1440 x 1080i 25 High Quality
    i get the feeling the problem may be occurring as the footage is remaining as interlaced footage through-out and not being blended or discarded to progressive.
    i have tried making the footage progressive on export thinking it might solve the problem, but it turns out there is no such thing as progressive HD PAL in media encoder and encore
    i love adobe's workflow but we have never been fond of main-concept from the start with things like this, even Mpeg2-DVD exports come out softer than you'd expect
    any thoughts, light or general directions on what to do to help figure out the problem would be great..

    after around 30 small sample exports, builds and different renders... I have discovered the problem and am now on track to fixing it..
    it turns out certain adobe effects such as 'lighting effects' do NOT work well with slo-mo or frame held clips.. upon taking this one effect off, the clip looks flatter and less dynamic in context of my edit, but the clip plays normally no matter what the export settings, codec or format..
    what's hallarious is that these effects and edits export and author perfectly fine onto DVD through Mpeg2.. i guess they just flatten better etc.. i get the impression when Adobe started crafting their software for HD they just built on top of the normal effects etc they already had and expected them to work.. if only Premiere could get the updates, priority and attention Photoshop does..
    again, i love premiere's work flow, i just can't see how they can put the word 'Pro / Professional' near this software...
    many thanks all
    Steve

  • AME Shuts Down when exporting H.264 Blu Ray

    I have a current project that was shot in HDV and I am trying to export an H.264 Blu Ray file.  This is a 4 Disk set and the other 3 files exported with no problems but for some reason I cannot get this last one (which happens to be Disk #3).  I will start AME running as I am getting ready to leave my office.  When I come back in the morning there is nothing open on my desktop, just the normal screen.  Anyoen have any ideas???  Below are my export setting and computer info
    Format: H.264 Blu Ray
    Preset: Custom
    Pixel Aspect Ratio: Widescreen 16:9
    Profile: High
    Level: 4.1
    Bitrate Encoding: VBR 2 pass
    Target Bitrate: 20 Mbps
    Maximum Bitrate: 25 Mbps
    Audio: PCM
    Multiplexing: None
    Computer
    Windows XP Pro 64
    Intel Core 2 Quad 2.5GHz
    4 GB RAM
    300 GB System Drive
    1.5 TB Video Dive with 700 GB of free space.
    Thanks
    Phil

    This is from the regular LOG.
    5/9/2009 12:37:29 PM : Queue Started
    - Source File: C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\Kapadia Wedding_24.prproj
    - Output File: V:\DVD's\Kapadia\From Premiere\Disk_3_HD.m4v
    - Preset Used: Custom
    - Video: NTSC, 1440x1080, 29.97 [fps], Upper
    - Audio: PCM Audio, 48 kHz, Stereo
    - Bitrate: VBR, 2 Pass, Target 20.00, Max 25.00 [Mbps]
    That is it...  It does not show that there was a problem or that it was completed.
    I then went into the Errors Log and there was nothing about this particular project.
    Do you think that maybe the PC is shutting down and restarting?  Not sure how I would know that...
    Dont get me started on the Pr not supported by XP 64 thing.  Quite frustrating to me....
    Phil

  • Can PE9 burn Blu-ray files to DVD?

    I do not have a Blu-ray burner and do not anticipate getting one for a year or two.  I was not able to burn or copy Blu-ray files in PE7 and ask if it can be done in PE9.  I did download the trial version of Sony Vegas HD Movie Studio Suite and was able to burn the Blu-ray files to the hard drive and to a DVD; that DVD played brilliantly on both Samsung and LG Blu-ray players.  I have a lot invested in Premier over the years and would prefer to upgrade.
    The machine is 2.67ghz dual core, 4gb of RAM and a 500gb RAID 0 hard drive with more than 175gb free.

    Lots of other posts on this subject in this forum
    Yes it can - but
    My first attempt played on other players except my new Pioneer player. (Full HD)
    The video on the disk was perfect on my computer.
    I copied the file produced on the Blue Ray disk and used a simple authoring program (PowerProducer that cam with my burner) to burn another disk.
    This plays perfectly in everything.
    The only thing I can think of is that my LG player can write at 8x but I only had 4x blank disks (they are much cheaper). PE9 does not have any speed setting so perhaps the "grooves" werent burnt deep enough??
    or the name of the main folder on a PE9 burnt disk is different - maybe my player did not like it??
    I have a similar computer setup to you except you definately need at least 2 hard drives. The video on one and the project on a second one.
    You need a good fast video card for HD smooth preview, not just the one on the motherboard.
    Also look at recent posts on memory settings for resources.
    I split my raid up to 2 seperate disks and installed a third large disk for video capture files
    OS & PE9 on C
    Video on E
    Project and adove cache files on F
    LG computer burner is available for around $100

  • AE CS4 render engine / Adobe Media Encoder won't create a container for h.264 blu-ray

    here's the problem.
    First, I tried to render a comp using the render engine inside AE using h.264 blu-ray preset.
    It was supposed to create 1 file, but I ended up with 3 : audio track, video and a file with .xmpses extension.
    I then decided to render it in lossless .mov, which works fine, but 3:40 minutes is taking up over 8gb, which is of course, unacceptable.
    After that, I've put the .mov file into Media Encoder to try h.264 blu-ray there.
    Absolutely the same ********.
    I'm using the Mac version of AE CS4.
    Here is the screenshot of original .mov file and the result. As you see, it refuses to make a container. This is absolutely unacceptable

    It raises another question: what settings do I need to encode the comp in 720p resolution without taking up lots of space?
    Well, it depends on whether you need a production master (something for broadcast, for example, or to use as a source for other encoding tasks) or if you want a version for distribution. If it's the former, there's nothing wrong with "lots of space" - A Quicktime file with PNG or Animation codec is a good idea, but it will take a lot of space. If it's the latter, H264 is perfect but there's no built-in preset to take 720 material to the web.
    You could do this:
    * Pick the generic H264 template. You'll see that it will give an error if you attempt to render, because the default setting uses an H264 profile/level which doesn't let you use HD resolutions.
    * In the H264 video options, set the "Profile" menu to "Main" and "Level" to 4.0. That will keep it compatible to Quicktime and Flash player, while allowing larger frame sizes and higher bit rates.
    * Set Target Bitrate to 5-8 Mbps and Maximum Bitrate to 9-10 Mbps if you're targetting web delivery. That's a bit over what Apple uses for 720p content on the Apple TV, for example.
    The H264 original preset will instruct you in the comment field to stretch to 640x480 in Output Module. There's no need, since you are using a profile/level combination which allows higher frame sizes.

  • CS4 - Adobe Media Encoder - Encore - H.264 Blu-ray

    As many folks are aware, Encore's transcoding can sometimes be less than optimal. I played with the AME settings and with the help of other folks on these and other forums finally determined all the right settings so that Encore would treat my DVD quality videos as native and not attempt to transcode them.
    I am now trying my hand at Blu-Ray and am running into similar problems but so far I have not really found any answers that have worked. Based on my research, the following settings should work:
    AME
    Format: H.264 Blu-ray
    _Video_
    TV Standard: NTSC
    Frame Dimensions: 1920x1080
    Frame Rame: 23.976
    Field Order: None (Progressive)
    Pixel Aspect Ratio: Widescreen 16:9
    Profile: High
    Level: 4.1
    _Bitrate Settings
    Bitrate Encoding: VBR, 1 Pass
    Target Bitrate: 18
    Max Bitrate: 22
    _Audio_
    I have Multiplexing disabled because I am using DD 5.1 encoding and for DVD quality, I learned that Multiplexing is a no-no to prevent Encore from trying to transcode things. I assume the same thing applies to Blu-Ray so I'm not really worried about the Audio.
    Encore
    _Project Settings_
    Authoring Mode: Blu-ray
    _Settings
    Television Standard: NTSC
    Codec: H.265
    Dimensions: 1920x1080
    Frame Rate: 23.976
    Fields: No Fields (Progressive Scan)
    _Automatic Transcoding
    Maximum Audio/Video Bitrate: 25.0 Mbps
    _Audio Transcoding
    Audio Transcoding Scheme: Dolby Digital
    I have tried a number of other settings around these (including using 29.97 frame rate to match my source), but after 4 days of trying different things with AME, I am completely stumped. What I am primarily looking for is someone to be kind enough to post their settings, in the level of detail above, that allow them to import an asset into Encore so that it doesn't want to transcode the video.
    I know there are other tools out there that can do these things, but I paid my $ for Adobe Mastersuite so that it would do all these things for me. If at all possible, I would really like to stick with just these tools.
    I am not sure if it matters, but my source is a Panasonic HDC-TM700 set to record in 1080p30 (I don't use their proprietary 60 frame format). I have successfully downconverted this source with AME to DVD quality. I have also successfully outputted from AME to 1080p that was uploadable to Youtube. Again, I'm not sure that it matters other than I can make useable video from my source. Here are the properties of the video according to Premiere:
    Type: MPEG Movie
    File Size: 2.6 GB
    Image Size: 1920 x 1080
    Pixel Depth: 32
    Frame Rate: 29.97
    Source Audio Format: 48000 Hz - compressed - 6 channels
    Project Audio Format: 48000 Hz - 32 bit floating point - 6 channels
    Total Duration: 00;22;23;25
    Average Data Rate: 2.0 MB / second
    Pixel Aspect Ratio: 1.0
    My actual clip is about 6min, but my intention would be to use clips of up to an hour in length.
    Oh, I'm not sure if it is clear from my above information, but I am not using Adobe Dynamic Link. I'm not sure if that is where my problem lies, but my one attempt to use it did not produce the results I was looking for either.
    Thanks in advance for your time and for making it this far into my post
    -Jay

    Well, that's a bit of a disappointment. I have to imagine most Adobe users are bald due to Adobe providing settings/output options that it's own software doesn't like. I really don't understand the sense of that.
    In any event, I attempted to use:
    Format: H.264 Blu-ray
    Preset: HDTV 1080i 29.97 High Quality
    And Encore still wants to transcode the video. It also wanted to transcode the audio that the format put out (PCM audio). I tried messing with some of the settings in Field Order, Profile, and Level and no love all around. I also tried one of the 1440 formats and no love there.
    Does anyone truly have this working natively or am I just chasing my own tale? It really should not be this hard to get Premiere to output something that Encore will use without difficulty.
    -Jay

  • Adobe Media Encoder - Encore - H.264 Blu-ray

    I just exported a Premiere Pro timeline using the Media Encoder with H.264 Blu-ray format and the 1080i 29.97 HQ preset. Presumably, you would choose this so that you do not have to transcode when you get to Encore. However, when I put my 16GB M4V file in a timeline, it wants to transcode saying it is "Untranscoded". Why? It also says the Blu-ray disc is only 11GB.
    Please tell me there is something I can do to prevent from having to re-encode or transcode this file when it is already in a Blu-ray format.

    hello,
    "This bug is with only H264 VBR 2 Pass presets and if you change to VBR 1 Pass keeping evverything same, the bug should not be there."
    honestly speaking, most everyone agrees that 2 pass is better quality than 1 pass
    and if this issue has been happening since cs4 and we just received our first update
    to cs5.5.1 for ppro, why does adobe still require us to 'lower' quality settings...
    it's almost like adobe doesn't want us exporting a full quality BD...
    doesn't adobe have the resources to fix this issue already?
    unless there is an acceptable answer, then shouldn't this be unacceptable...?
    this is almost like saying, "yeah the full hd presets don't work, but if you use the standard def presets, you should be okay..."
    especially if other authoring programs can do 2pass BD discs...
    is there an acceptable answer as to why this issue hasn't been fixed?
    is there any plans to update encore?
    thanks,
    jeffrey

  • Audio not in sync after encoding to H.264 Blu ray

    I have recently been trying to author my first blu-ray and keep running into new problems everytime I think I find a new solution. My new problem is that when I encode my sequence from Ppro CC to H.264 Blu-ray and place the video file and audio file into Encore CS6 the audio seems to be falling out of sync. I tried placing both files into a new PPro sequence and checked the playback and they are also out of sync there. 
    Things I've tried:
    1) I went back and just encoded the audio from the sequence but this time I switched the audio coding to DD 320 bitrate instead of PCM. When I placed this file into the PPro sequence the playback was perfect. However, when I try placing the same two files (video and audio) into Encore they are out of sync.
    2) I decided to take the encoded video file and place it back into the original PPro sequence and use it to replace the original video track. The playback again fell out of sync. Since this sequence had the original pre-encoded audio track, I came to the conclusion that it is actually the video that is not keeping up with the audio once encoded.
    I am trying to encode to 1920x1080 HD 23.967 fps H.264 Blu Ray. I know I can just encoded to .avi match source and then let Encore do the transcoding, but figuring out this problem is a learning experience for me. Does PCM or Dolby Digital make a difference? What is the best way to do?

    It sounds like things went wonky the first time around.  Try exporing the whole thing again.
    PCM is higher quality.  Blu-rays have a lot of room compared to DVD, so I feel it's often the better choice.  I'd recommend using DD only when you have to.  But considering that I've put 3 hours of HD onto disk and still only filled 17GB, I think it's the very rare occasion when you'll run out of room and have to use DD on Blu-ray.

  • Encore insists on transcoding H.264 Blu-ray encoded file (Blu-ray legal)

    I have a Blu-ray legal .m4v file encoded out of Adobe Media Encoder as H.264 Blu-ray VBR 2-Pass, maximum render, target 25Mbps, maximum 30Mbps.
    My project is H.264, maximum 40Mbps.
    Encore keeps listing the video file as untranscoded and wants to transcode it.
    I've tried encoding just a portion of the video file instead of the whole thing using the same settings and when I bring this into Encore it recognizes it as Blu-ray legal and sets it to "Don't Transcode".
    Can anyone think of a reason as to why this is happening?  I really don't want to sit through another eight hour encode that could degregade pq further.
    Thanks!

    A .264 file from x264Pro or MeGUI that is BD-legal will import into En and be automatically set to Do Not Transcode.  So the file extension isn't the problem.  There are some esoteric H.264 parameters in x264 that must be set precisely in order to have En set the .264 file to DNT.  I suspect those same parameters will have to be set in MainConcept's encoder.
    If you want to jump in the deep end, here are the x264 parameters that produce BD-legal output that also make En happy:
    program --pass 2 --bitrate 16000 --stats ".stats" --open-gop bluray --interlaced --pic-struct --level 4.1 --bframes 3 --ref 4 --slices 4 --aud --nal-hrd vbr --b-pyramid strict --keyint 30 --min-keyint 3 --vbv-bufsize 30000 --vbv-maxrate 40000 --weightp 0 --colorprim "bt709" --transfer "bt709" --colormatrix "bt709" --output "output" "input"
    Obviously interlacing, bitrate, vbv-maxrate and such can be set as desired based on the source footage and delivery requirements.
    Jeff

  • H.264 blu-ray 720P60 sync problem

    I'm not able to maintain sync between sound and video when encoding 720P59.94 sequences (avi or mov) to 720P 59.94 h.264 Blu-ray (standard PrPro export settings). The sync is lost gradually, and at the end of a 42 minute clip, is off by more than a second. In trying to chase this down, I noticed that the exported elementary video file is longer than the source sequence by about 1 frame per minute. The elementary sound file (Dolby or PCM) appears to be the same length as the source sequence.
    Although I first noticed this in Encore (Blu-ray project),  an import of the "encode" files back into Premiere Pro confirmed the situation.
    I checked very carefully to ensure that my sequence settings and export settings are consistant - 1280x720 P 59.94.
    I don't see this sync problem with the non-blu-ray h.264 (multiplexed) encode, and I don't see this problem with the mpeg2 blu-ray encoder.
    I'm interested to know if this issue is unique to my setup, and if not, if there's a fix or workaround.
    I'm running the latest versions of software -
    Adobe CS 6.03 (monthly account)
    Kona LHi 10.3.2 (up to date)
    win 7, i7, 16G ram
    Thanks...Ben

    Jim,
    I found that, of the sequences I've been working with, those that were created by dragging the footage onto the "new" icon were NDF. Sequences that I initiated from scratch are DF. But even after exporting to h.264 from a "DF" sequence, when re-imported and dropped on the "new" icon, a NDF sequence was created.
    So...I established a new DF AVI sequence, and copied the source footage into it. This gave me a 720P59.94 DF cineform avi sequence, which doesn't seem any different than the NDF predecessor. Audio and video are in sync from beginning to end - 42 minutes duration.
    I did a fresh export from this sequence to the adobe h.264 blu-ray preset (720P59.94, dolby, high, 4.1).
    I then re-imported the resulting m4v, and dragged it onto an unused track in the source sequence. As expected, It extended beyond the source by 78 frames (in 42 minutes), and had the gradual drift out of sync.
    I applied the 50 % crop, and looked for the first sign of change between the two tracks. I noted that at 00;01;01;42, the h.264  "encode" track seem to take one step backward, resulting in a 2 frame difference for a while. I tried to find the next exact place where a change occur, but found it impossible to do so.
    Since this seems kind of weird, it would be helpful to know if anyone else has been successful in exporting a 720P59.94 sequence to h.264 blu-ray, without gradual loss of sync. The duration would need to be long enough for the sync loss to be obvious - 15 minutes or so?

  • Downsides to multiplexing audio for H.264 Blu-ray disc?

    I have a 9 minute video; personal/consumer use; 1280x720; 59.94; source video from a Contour+ helmet camera that stores .mov, H.264; audio is on a separate track from my own selection of mp3 files (it is a music video).   I have three intended playback targets: Blu-ray disc, Sony PS3 native, and PC/Windows Media Player.   Is there a big downside on video or audio quality in this case using multiplexing to produce a single .m2t file imported into Encore to produce the BD vs. separate .m4v/.wav files?   Not a huge deal, but having to maintain one production files vs. three is a minor plus if it makes little to no difference on the BD front.
    Depending on the answer, If I use the H.264 Blu-ray format/preset in PP to produce the .m2t file does Encore have to re-encode?   I am assuming Encore does not reencode if I am using separate .m4v/.wav files.
    Thanks

    You must always remember gents, when you multiplex, there is a BUFFER attached to that (computer term that means a chunk of size and bit defined fast memory space that holds an intermediate piece of data for shuttling to the next piece of hardware).  This changes the MAX Bitrate allowed for your video (but it doesn't show in AME cs6 and I don't think it shows in lower versions; not sure about cc).  Since you are tying one stream to another, and effectively weaving the data into one stream, you are maxing out the amount of data you can pass in that stream.  Only certain types of data can be read in this manner.  Think of it this way, you have taken two sets of data with different bit widths, and different bit-sample rates, and tied them together into one stream.  This stream still has to fit in the max data rates of the medium.  Your video cannot exceed 30mb\s and you are also left with another problem.  Audio, without mux, has so many different formats and bit fiddling profiles that it would be difficult to make sure it was within the sizing for data.  If, however, you limit it to one major codec, and use predefined bit\sample rates that can be sized up, you'll be able to tell if all the settings are "legal" or not, as you then have a predefined data-size for both audio and video.  If you don't multiplex, you get 2 streams.  It takes longer to load the disc, but both streams are cached.  Typically, with more motion, I like to non-plex, but with more emphasis on audio, I start leaning toward a TS file.  IF you want forward compatibility, select an intermediate codec, with little to no compression, save to a disc image, then burn a disc and file it away.  Every 10-15 years, hire an intern to turn their hair white recoding all your video and following the same procedure (unpaid internship time), but make them happy by hiring them as "Labor" on a short job or two and pay them well for standing around or stroking the egos of the "Talent".  What can I say, we all work more diligently and creatively when we feel more connected with it, whether we're brooding and trying to communicate the angst of a lost generation, or felling powerful enough to choreograph leaping tall buildings in a single bound.  Misery loves company, and powerful loves to be reminded it is by everybody whether it is or isn't.
    If you need better clarification...
    Lets go back to dvd for a moment.  DVD structure is Video TS and Audio TS.  TS is Transport Stream.  A stream is a BUFFERED movement of data that is transferred quickly in set sized chunks.  In DVD there were two transport streams to play back early on.  Later, many started muxing those streams and encrypting them, so that upon Decrypting they could be played.  Muxing made the encryption easier, as only one stream needed to be encrypted and it was all in the Video TS.  Audio TS folders are still written, but there is little data there.  In fact, removing this folder when no data is actually present has shown in some cases to do no damage, while in others, it will not play.  This is because, it is used as a shell to copy.  It initiates the audio stream playback on older players, and on newer players it isn't necessary.
    Blu-ray yields similar limitations.  You need to match the size of the buffer you are feeding.  Most players max out around 35mps from the old sets, and newer players actually pull more like 50mps.  If you don't know your target, you'll be out of luck.  I've seen blu-rays that don't play on older players being sold at video stores, at Frys, everywhere.  I've played them on an old one and found them to be unplayable.  Newer formats do not work with older players, but, they note it on the package that you need to meet certain specs, and those specs can usually be found on a sticker on your device so you can see if they match.  Remember your Target BitRate and Max Bitrate.  The Target should be less than the max for the device you aim for.  CS6 won't usually allow anything over 32.7mps, anyway, so setting this in AME even with dynamic linking could cause problems.  However, you do have the choice to locate a transcode... ...presents an interesting possibility.  I've been trying to get a project done or I'd try this myself:
    I'd use the x264 free codec, with some basic options and blu-ray-compatible flag, with --fake-interlaced, to create a transcode and link it into encore.  However, encore hasn't liked any of my transcodes that use multiple passes.  I'm going to try with a single pass later, and produce an intermediate output for now.

  • Exporting H.264 Blu-ray material in CS3

    System:
    2009 Mac Pro 3.33GHz Quad core
    Snow Leopard 10.6.5
    16GB RAM
    Radeon HD 5870
    Adobe Premiere Pro CS3, 3.2.0
    Video material:
    DVCProHD, 1080p60i/24p, 23.976fps shot on P2, MXF file format.
    Exporting to:
    H.264 Blu-ray via Adobe Media Encoder
    I can render Blu-ray material, and even burn it in an internal LG 10x Blu-ray burner that I installed.  The result was wonderful when played back on a Blu-ray player and HDTV.
    What I cannot figure out is why I have to render projects in small little segments, rather than one large one, and then line them all up on a timeline in Encore.  I then have to rearrange my chapter points, since Encore places a chapter marker at each clip.  It's not the biggest deal in the world, but it's just annoying.
    I've tried different settings, and the one that gives me the most success is starting with the preset for H.264 (Blu-ray), HDTV 1080p 23.976 High Quality, and switching the Profile from High to Main, and leaving the rest alone.  I'm not sure if I tried HDTV 1080i 29.97... maybe I should.  Whether it crashes or not seems to depend on how many effects are in the clip, or how long the segment is, but I can usually get away with up to about 10000 frames of video without a crash.  The crash almost always occurs during the second pass of VBR encoding.  It closes Premiere and offers the crash report window, which I am not good at decyphering.  Anyway, I always submit the crash report with what I was trying to do.  Adobe has many of them from me now.
    Can anyone shed some light as to why it only allows 6000-10000 frames go through this encoding process?  My system will show that it only used about 6 out of 16 GB of RAM after a fresh reboot.  It helps if I reboot between each encode session, as well.  If I try to encode two short segments without rebooting between, I usually get a crash.  Also, I can encode DVDs just fine with the same project.  I encoded the 105 minute movie with all the same effects, clips, etc. and the DVD was flawless on the first try.  It's just the H.264 Blu-ray setting that jacks it up.
    I'm glad I can get the thing done piecemeal, but I was hoping someone could at least explain why it's so difficult. (:

    I would agree, and I think it must have to do with RAM.  When I get a segment exported successfully, the Activity Monitor shows very close to all 16 GB used in many cases.  I surmise that when the program sucks too close to all 16GB up, it crashes.

  • Premier CS4 will export H.264 Blu Ray, but not a H.264 file.

    When I export the file under H.264, Adobe Encoder won't even load the project file. However, it loads and completely exports my 25 minute 1080p HD 24 fps film under the H.264-Blu Ray option which takes about 17 hours on my Dinosaur PC.
    So basically, I already have a 25 minute 4 gig film on a Blu-ray disc that I burned at my friends Modern computer, and now I just want a standalone MP4 file as a backup.   
    Anyone?
    Bill Hunt?
    Specs,
    Windows XP service pack 3
    2.8  Ghz
    3.25 GB RAM
    37G free HD
    and 30G free on a 640G EXTERNAL 

    Despite the Interlaced UFF export setting, the H.264 option doesn't respect that and exports out a poorly deinterlaced progressive video instead.
    If you need interlaced H.264, always use the H.264 Blu-ray option.

  • H.264 Blu-Ray rendered .m4v files won't playback in any media player except Adobe software

    Hello guys and thank you in advance for your help. I am going to pull my hair out!
    I had to reinstall Windows 7 and am experiencing an issue that is driving me crazy. All of my 720p H.264 Blu-Ray.m4v files rendered with After Effects will not play in any player I try in Windows. I've tried Windows Media Player, VLC, and Media Player Classic. I've tried with a clean install and no other codecs except those included with Windows 7. I've tried installing additional h.264 codecs. I've tried installing ffdshow and other codecs as well and no matter what I do, the files will not play at all.
    The only way I can preview the file it to load it in AE or Encore or something similiar. Unfortunately, this is not the best solution for me. I'd love to be able to preview the files quickly and efficiently through Windows Explorer / Media Player without opening Adobe software. I don't think that's too much to ask.
    Another issue is that before I reinstalled Windows that these files played back just fine in Windows Media Player! I don't know why it was working and now it's not on a clean install. All of the hardware is the same. On the original working install, I don't recall installing any additional codec packs or anything. It just worked...
    Regular .mp4 H.264 files (not Blu-Ray) play just fine in all players. Something the Blu-Ray spec is doing to the file causes it to not work. And changing the extension to mp4 does nothing.
    Please tell me what I am doing wrong! Is it something with the Mainconcept codec? Is it something with my drivers? What am I missing?!?

    Thanks for the suggesstion Mylenium, but that didn't help either.
    I installed PowerDVD which came with the Blu-Ray drive, and also a trial of ArcSoft's Blu-Ray player, and neither would play the files.
    Any other suggestions? This is killing me. I don't understand why they would play before and not now. The files arne't corrupt. Even new rendered outputs in the same preset won't play. They'll load into Encore just fine though and even are listed as "Don't Transcode", so I know the files themselves are okay.
    Could it have anything to do with drivers? I was testing an Nvidia video card with my last build and now I'm just using a Sandy Bridge chip with Intel's on-board video. But I do remember even when I took the Nvidia card out and just ran on-board video the last time, the files still played fine...

  • How do I determine correct media encoder settings for Blu-Ray

    I am successfully producing Hi Def Blu-Ray disks by using one of the presets available in Premiere media encoder. Actually using the HDTV 1080i 25 High Quality setting. They playback in beautiful high definition but I think I was just lucky. I would really like to know what determines the setting I should use.
    1. I live in Australia so I assume PAL.
    2. My camera is a Sony HDV. HCR HC9 1440 x 1080i. I assume this is irrelevant to export encoding settings for Blu-Ray.
    3. The export encoder preset has field order set to Upper. I would have thought I should either match the project settings which is interlaced to match my camera and project. OR more likely I should match the audience TV which would be a widesceen plama or LCD TV. I dont know if these TVs are interlaced or progressive. OR is it more a question of what field order the Blu-Ray player expects me to send on the disk?
    4. I will play on a TV 1920 x 1080 pixel capable and on slightly lower resoultion widescreens. The encoder preset is for 1920 x 1080 so I assume that's ok for all widescreen TVs even lower definition ones.
    As you can tell I am a learner. Any suggested links to basic reading on the subject would help me.
    Robert
    PS Put this item in wrong forum previously.

    Since no response I've been searching and found the following.
    When encoding to make a Blu-Ray disk from my HDV 1080i footage:
    1. Tell encoder the source is 1080i That is interlaced and it's TOP field first for HDV footage.
    2. Tell it to encode to 1440 x 1080 resolution. You could tell it 1920 x 1080 but it will take much longer to encode. Will be good but why bother. All BD players will automatically up the 1440 to 1902 full screen.
    3. Beware, not all players support BD-R and BD-RE recordable disks.
    Seems Panasonic is good. Samsung probably good. Sony and Sharp probably not able to read (yet).
    4. All players read MPEG-2 compression and H264 compression. Use a bit rate of 25 Mbps for MPEG-2 encode or 18 Mbps for equivalent result in H264 encode. Can use higher rates. These are minimums for a very good result
    5. One pass encode is pretty damn good but use two pass if you have the time to wait for the encode.

Maybe you are looking for

  • HELP PLEASE!  Home directory is full????  Anyone ever hear of this before??

    I try to open Mail and this is the pop-up that I get: "Mail cannot update your mailboxes because your home directory is full. You must free up space in your home folder before using Mail. Delete unneeded documents or move documents to another volume.

  • Audio problem with 2gen ipod touch

    Recently I've been having issues with my second generation Ipod Touch and I'm hoping that someone will be able to help me. The problem is a bit strange, so please bear with me as I try to explain it. As I said, I have a second generation 8GB Ipod Tou

  • Anyone tried the new Weblogic Scripting Tool (WLST)?

    Has anyone tried using the new WebLogic Scripting Tool (WLST) that was recently posted on the dev2dev WebLogic Utilities site: http://dev2dev.bea.com/resourcelibrary/utilitiestools/adminmgmt.jsp It looks to be a handy tool that is built upon jython a

  • Can I Modify .MDB VBA From Access 2010?

    Hello: Currently, I am using Access 2010 and 2013.  One of my clients is still using an mdb file created by Access 2003.  They don't want me to upgrade to .accdb, but want me to modify the VBA code. Prior to today, I had a version of Access 2003, but

  • FW-4-TCP_OoO_SEG: TCP reassembly queue overflow - session

    After upgrading a Cisco 892 to IOS c890-universalk9-mz.151-4.M3.bin from c890-universalk9-mz.124-22.YB.bin(reason was tracebacks) we have noticed the following message's in the logging: %FW-4-TCP_OoO_SEG: Dropping TCP Segment: seq:1628726886 1492 byt