Is samba included in Solaris 9 / x86?

Hello... I have Solaris 9 x86 platform, and I need Samba to make my HD visible from a MS Win network... is Samba included in my Solaris? or I must download it...? from where?
Thanks!

It is included in Solaris 9:
ls -l /usr/sfw/bin/smb*"cp /etc/sfw/smb.conf-example /etc/sfw/smb.conf",
configure the smb.conf file, then "/etc/init.d/samba start" and other
windows boxes on your network can use your solaris machine as
a windows file and print server.

Similar Messages

  • Is Sun ONE included in Solaris 9 x86?

    I can't tell for sure if it's included, but I would think the Platform edition would be included. Can anybody who has already installed it verify this?
    Thanks in advance.

    I can't tell for sure if it's included, but I would think the Platform edition > would be included. Can anybody who has already installed it verify this?Some pieces are there now in the EA, like the LDAP Directory Services, but the App Server is not there yet and the folks responsible got back to me saying it will be early '03 before that is delivered.
    Regards,
    Alan DuBoff

  • Solaris 10 x86 (10/08) and an nVidia Quadro4

    Hi all!
    I have an nVidia Quadro4 AGP graphics card that originally came with the box that I installed Solaris 10 x86 and Xandros 4.5 OCE on. I didn't have DVI to VGA cables at the time so I went with an ATI 32MB Radeon 7000.
    I know have the needed cables and would like to use this card. One question, nVidia lists their drivers for the x64/x86 Solaris 10. I have a P4 2GHz box-would this driver work? I am not above doing a reinstall as I can recreate everything I need on the box. Any pointers in this area would be most helpful.
    Regards,
    James

    It should. You probably won't need to download anything from nVidia either, what's included in Solaris 10 x86 10/08 will probably suffice for most uses.
    Tim

  • Xmessage on Solaris 10 x86

    Hi,
    I would like to know if there is a tool included in Solaris 10 x86 that replaces the old xmessage tool, which can be found for Solaris 10 sparc, but not for x86 ( I've searched in sunfreeware but could'nt find one ).
    Thanks by advance

    i like "zenity" which is a gnome thing which you can use to display lots of different messages, ask questions and so forth. It comes in handy quite often :-)
    7/M.

  • Retain SAMBA permissions while migrating from linux to solaris 10 x86

    Hello,
    We are migrating a system from Redhat to Solaris 10 x86 and this has brought up a question on how we can restore our SAMBA files and retain our permissions that are associated by the users name rather then their numeric ID(UID/GID). So far my research hasnt produced anything that gives a solid answer to how we do this and is it even possible.
    The problem is that Windows user and group accounts are mapped locally per host by default. That mapping is defined as the accounts are referenced, so unless there is a way to guarantee the order of accounts being referenced, the mappings from Windows SIDs to Unix UIDs will be different between old and new.
    If the data restoration option we choose for the new server is naive and restores only by UID and GID, the permissions in the ACLs will not map to the correct Windows accounts. We either must find a restoration option which restores permissions by name rather than ID or we must create a script which can automate pushing the ACLs into the restored filesystem correctly by name.
    Initially I thought ufsdump could handle this but we are on ext3 filesystem going to vxfs. I have read a little on star but havent heard about it before. Has anyone used star for backup/restore for the purpose of retaining ACL ownership/permissions? It seems like its an old utility, maybe not used much anymore. Does anyone have a utility they have used for this purpose?
    Your help is much appreciated!!
    LR

    The problem is that Windows user and group accounts are mapped locally per host by default. That mapping is defined as the accounts are referenced, so unless there is a way to guarantee the order of accounts being referenced, the mappings from Windows SIDs to Unix UIDs will be different between old and new.Is there anyway that you can sanitize and post a small snippet of what's going on with the mapping files? I think I can follow this but I'm a bit confused by the username/UID thing since usually if a username is defined in /etc/passwd than the files will display the username. If a username is not defined in /etc/passwd then the ls command will revert to just showing the numbers which I take it is what you don't want to happen.
    If you could also sanitize and post even one of the acl's that might help clear up that portion of the problem as well.
    alan

  • Solaris 10/X86 install appears to have destroyed my display.

    Hello folks -
    I'm new here, I searched and did not find anything that matched so I'm posting. If I'm asking about something previously covered, please be patient, I'll learn.
    I am running an Asus A7N8 Deluxe motherboard with an Athlon 2800+, standard ATA/133 drives and an Nvidia 6800 AGP supplied by PNY. My display is a Viewsonic VA2012wb, which I've since learned is only available at a well-known warehouse membership store.
    I've been using this setup under XP for some months now, and yesterday I decided to try and install Sol10/X86 again now that some new drivers are available that support my onboard LAN. Nothing untoward happened during the install (I'm very familiar with the process on Sparc hardware), and I was asked to reboot so I could start installing CD2.
    Suddenly, no display on boot. Troubleshooting ensued, and I found that I was able to get the monitor to display if I connected the VGA cable instead of the DVI interface I've successfully used all this time.
    Subsequent troubleshooting included:
    1. Changing out the 6800 with a 6200 I had on hand.
    2. Booting to XP to see if the Nvidia Twinview stuff had become confused - The Nvidia software behaved as if there was nothing available on the DVI input, so many menus did not even appear.
    3. Checking with Viewsonic to make sure that I was clear on how the monitor selects inputs. It's largely automatic, but hitting the '2' key on the front panel forces a rescan of the analog and digital inputs.
    4. Substituting another display on this workstation, with all cables unchanged, so I could verify that the DVI output on my video card still worked. Tested fine.
    5. Moving the affected display to another workstation, to see if it was capable of functioning on the DVI input from a different machine. It was not, test failed.
    6. Unplugging everything and letting it sit for over an hour (while I fumed) - test failed.
    7. Returned the affected display to Costco today, for a spanky new one. It worked great on DVI with existing hardware (and under XP) this afternoon, so I decided to re-start my Solaris install.
    Lather, rinse, repeat, or so I was about to find out....
    After I was asked to reboot from CD1, my display died again.
    Just like yesterday, it's currently working fine on the VGA input/dead to the world on DVI, and just like yesterday, everything was fine until the first reboot after the Solaris CD1. I repeated the most pertinent aspects of my prior diagnostic steps, and then I went out to the back porch to curse and throw tools until I felt better.
    I cannot find a hardware reset button for the display, and an old friend of mine reports that he had a similar issue under Solaris 8/X86 in which he ended up blowing up a CRT. The Sol8 installer was overdriving the monitor.
    That said, I don't think that the DVI interface is able to 'overdrive' a monitor, and that confuses me more deeply. I know that if I (re)abuse the return policy of this warehouse store once more tomorrow and get a new display it will fix the problem, but I'm hoping that I can fix this in house!
    I refuse to believe that Solaris is actually frying the DVI input on my display, but I do have clear evidence that it the installer is a destructive force, at least with Nvidia cards and a VA2012wb. I'm seeing some similar threads on the Linux forums, some mentioning the part number of my display in specific, but no clear resolutions yet.
    Any thoughts?
    - Eli

    OK, well... I did a restart, invoking the 'option' command, and the Lion Recovery partition did not show up, so I went ahead and booted back into SL, wherein I was given a 'The disk you inserted was not readable by this computer' with a choice of ejecting, ignoring, or initializing.  I chose Ignore, and the drive now just shows up in disk utility as 'media' with no opportunity to interact with it.
    I had the presence of mind to make a Lion DVD before I installed, so I booted with that, and it too was unable to interact with the drive.
    Given the degraded state of this drive, I have no reason to suspect that entering target disk mode and mounting to my MBP would bear any fruit... looks like this sucker is beyond hope.  Yay...
    I will not be re-installing Lion until at least .2 comes out at this point.. I can't afford a wasted day like this again.

  • Who knows - Has Oracle plan to make 9i on Solaris Intel x86 in the future?

    Now Sun continue support of Solaris Intel, But Oracle release only 8.1.7 exist.
    Any comments,please

    Hi again,
    assumption proven ;-)
    full details from Oracle below
    HTH,
    Peter
    Applies to: Oracle Server - Enterprise Edition - Version: 10.2.0.1
    SymptomsWhile installing Oracle10gR2 on a Solaris 10 x86-64 server, Oracle Universal Installer (OUI) reports the following errors while checking the kernel parameters:
    shmsys:shminfo_shmmax=4294967295 found no entry . Failed <<
    shmsys:shminfo_shmmni=100 found no entry . Failed <<
    shmsys:shminfo_semmni=100 found no entry . Failed <<
    shmsys:shminfo_semmsl=256 found no entry . Failed <<
    The overall results of this check is Failed.
    The kernel parameters do not meet the minimum requirements
    CauseOUI is looking at /etc/system to check the kernel parameter settings, but this file is not used (by default) in Solaris 10
    OUI should check the kernel parameter settings using the resource control utility ( /bin/prctl )
    SolutionTo implement the solution, please execute one the following steps:
    1. Verify that the kernel parameter settings are correct using the resource control utility ( /bin/prctl ) and then start OUI like this:
    ./runInstaller -ignoreSysPrereqs
    OR
    2. Include the recommended kernel parameter settings in the /etc/system file and start OUI as normal:
    ./runInstaller

  • Intel network interface with Solaris 10 x86

    Hi,
    I have been Googling all evening to try and find a solution to this, but here is the problem:
    I have a PC built around an Asus P4C800-E system board, and I have Solaris 10 x86 01/2006 installed. I would like to get the Ethernet interface (Intel adaptor, running on a CSA bus) up and running - but for some reason I can't seem to get the driver to bind to the proper address (pci8086,1019 - from what I have been able to find out): It instead insists on binding to pci1043,80f7. Even though pci8086,1019 is listed in /etc/device_aliases, it won't play nice.
    I know the NIC is working, and have tried it under other OSes (including Linux).
    Although Solaris x86 "sees" something there, and the interface is plumbed (it can even tell when the network link is up or down), I can't get the interface to work - pings do not work, etc.
    Is there a way I can convince the driver to bind to pci8086,1019 instead of pci1043,80f7?
    Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
    Joovilhar.

    <table border="0" align="center" width="90%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td class="SmallText"><b>Joovilhar wrote on Wed, 08 March 2006 02:14</b></td></tr><tr><td class="quote">
    I can't seem to get the driver to bind to the proper address (pci8086,1019 - from what I have been able to find out): It instead insists on binding to pci1043,80f7. Even though pci8086,1019 is listed in /etc/device_aliases, it won't play nice.
    </td></tr></table>
    Is 1043,80f7 the device's pci subsystem vendor and subsystem device id?
    And 8086,1019 is the normal vendor/device id?
    In this case everything would work as expected.
    What is listed by "/usr/X11/bin/scanpci -v" for the ethernet controller?
    <table border="0" align="center" width="90%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td class="SmallText"><b>Quote:</b></td></tr><tr><td class="quote">
    I know the NIC is working, and have tried it under other OSes (including Linux).
    Although Solaris x86 "sees" something there, and the interface is plumbed (it can even tell when the network link is up or down), I can't get the interface to work - pings do not work, etc.
    </td></tr></table>
    Try to boot the kernel with various settings of the "acpi-user-options" variable,
    to disable / enable ACPI. In previous Solaris x86 releases, when
    something went wrong configuring an interrupt vector for a nic device,
    the typical end result is a nic that is unable to receive incomming
    packets. Maybe your Asus P4C800-E is still problematic with ACPI, with
    S10 x86 1/2006, and needs the acpi-user-options workaround.
    http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/danasblog?anchor=configurin g_solaris_acpi_at_boot
    To change the "acpi-user-options" variable, edit the grub boot command
    line and edit the "multiboot" line, e.g. append "-Bacpi-user-options=0x2".

  • Solaris 10 x86 w/ Matrox G450 dual head and xinerama

    I have solaris 10 x86 with matrox g450 dual head and x.org x-server. The problem is to get xinerama work. When xinerama isn't enabled, two different desktops work well - or, they work, but they are pretty useless because I can't move windows between them. So, I have to enable xinerama, but it seems, that neither JDS/Gnome nor CDE haven't been built including support for xinerama.
    When I enable xinerama, X.org-x-server starts fine and there's dtlogin. When I login and it passes execution to gnome, it fails and x-server restarts. Same with CDE. But if I put 'exec /opt/sfw/bin/xterm to my .dtprofile', it starts ok and I can do some testing..
    % dtwm
    X Error of failed request: BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)
    Major opcode of failed request: 149 (XINERAMA)
    Minor opcode of failed request: 2 (XINERAMAGetScreenCount)
    Resource id in failed request: 0x0
    Serial number of failed request: 18
    Current serial number in output stream: 18
    % gtk-demo
    The program 'gtk-demo' received an X Window System error.
    This probably reflects a bug in the program.
    The error was 'BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)'.
    (Details: serial 13 error_code 3 request_code 149 minor_code 2)
    (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously;
    that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it.
    To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line<br />
    option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful
    backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.)
    % gtk-demo --sync<br />
    The program 'gtk-demo' received an X Window System error.
    This probably reflects a bug in the program.
    The error was 'BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)'.
    (Details: serial 13 error_code 3 request_code 149 minor_code 2)
    (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously;
    that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it.
    To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line<br />
    option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful
    backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.)
    If I start /opt/sfw/bin/fvwm2, it works fine too, so the problem seems to be gtk/glib/gnome and CDE. One odd thing is that, normal CDE-programs, like dtterm, dtcm, dtcalc etc. works fine. But dtwm doesn't work in xinerama mode.
    So, would anyone have any suggestion what could I do? Do I have to recompile my own GNOME, or could Sun do something to the next Solaris 10 update? (As far as I understood, current Solaris 10 release doesn't include zfs yet, so there will be update soon, I think)
    - Tuomas M

    Hello,
    I'm also using a g450.
    Now I'm trying for 5 days to get it work with xinerama under Xorg and/or
    Xsun.
    Can anybody tell me how to get it work ?
    I would like to see a working xorg.conf.
    (I don't know how to configure 2 screens for Xsun. Mybe someone can give my his configuration file(s) ?)
    Thanks to all who will help me !!!
    p.s. here is my latest attempt of xorg.conf which does not provide xinerama for me:
    Section "ServerLayout"
    Identifier "Multihead layout"
    Screen 0 "Screen 0" 0 0
    Screen 1 "Screen 1" Rightof "Screen 0"
    InputDevice "Mouse1" "CorePointer"
    InputDevice "Keyboard1" "CoreKeyboard"
    Option "Xinerama" "true"
    # Option "Clone" "off"
    EndSection
    Section "Module"
    Load "dbe" # Double buffer extension
    SubSection "extmod"
    Option "omit xfree86-dga" # don't initialise the DGA extension
    EndSubSection
    Load "bitstream"
    Load "type1"
    Load "Xst"
    Load "IA"
    EndSection
    Section "Files"
    RgbPath "/usr/X11/lib/X11/rgb"
    FontPath "/usr/X11/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType/"
    FontPath "/usr/X11/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/"
    FontPath "/usr/X11/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/sun/"
    FontPath "/usr/X11/lib/X11/fonts/F3bitmaps/"
    FontPath "/usr/X11/lib/X11/fonts/misc/"
    FontPath "/usr/X11/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/"
    FontPath "/usr/X11/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/"
    # FontPath "/usr/X11/lib/X11/fonts/local/"
    # FontPath "/usr/X11/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/"
    # FontPath "/usr/X11/lib/X11/fonts/freefont/"
    # ModulePath "/usr/X11/lib/modules"
    EndSection
    # Input devices
    Section "InputDevice"
    Identifier "Keyboard1"
    Driver "Keyboard"
    Option "AutoRepeat" "500 30"
    Option "XkbRules" "xorg"
    Option "XkbModel" "pc105"
    Option "XkbLayout" "de"
    EndSection
    # Core Pointer's InputDevice section
    Section "InputDevice"
    # Identifier and driver
    Identifier "Mouse1"
    Driver "mouse"
    Option "Protocol" "IMPS/2"
    Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5"
    Option "Device" "/dev/kdmouse"
    # Option "Emulate3Buttons"
    # Option "Emulate3Timeout" "50"
    EndSection
    # Monitor section
    # Any number of monitor sections may be present
    Section "Monitor"
    Identifier "nec"
    VendorName "NEC"
    ModelName "NEC LCD"
    HorizSync 30.0 - 81.0
    VertRefresh 50-90
    EndSection
    Section "Monitor"
    Identifier "nec2"
    VendorName "NEC"
    ModelName "NEC LCD"
    HorizSync 30.0 - 81.0
    VertRefresh 50-90
    EndSection
    # Graphics device section
    Section "Device"
    Identifier "Matrox"
    Driver "mga"
    VideoRam 32768
    BusID "PCI:01:00:0"
    # Insert Clocks lines here if appropriate
    EndSection
    Section "Device"
    Identifier "Matrox2"
    Driver "mga"
    VendorName "Matrox"
    BoardName "Matrox Millennium G450"
    BusID "PCI:01:04:0"
    # Option "MGASDRAM"
    EndSection
    # Screen sections
    Section "Screen"
    Identifier "Screen 0"
    Device "Matrox"
    Monitor "nec"
    DefaultDepth 16
    Subsection "Display"
    Depth 8
    Modes "1280x1024" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480"
    ViewPort 0 0
    EndSubsection
    Subsection "Display"
    Depth 16
    Modes "1280x1024" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480"
    ViewPort 0 0
    EndSubsection
    Subsection "Display"
    Depth 24
    Modes "1280x1024" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480"
    ViewPort 0 0
    EndSubsection
    EndSection
    Section "Screen"
    Identifier "Screen 1"
    Device "Matrox2"
    Monitor "nec2"
    DefaultDepth 16
    Subsection "Display"
    Depth 8
    Modes "1280x1024" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480"
    ViewPort 0 0
    EndSubsection
    Subsection "Display"
    Depth 16
    Modes "1280x1024" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480"
    ViewPort 0 0
    EndSubsection
    Subsection "Display"
    Depth 24
    Modes "1280x1024" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480"
    ViewPort 0 0
    EndSubsection
    EndSection

  • VmWare, Solaris 10, x86, Patch 120536-05, video drivers

    Hello,
    I have Solaris 10 x86 working under VmWare 5.x with JDS. I use the Xorg VmWare video driver with a resolution of 1280x1024.
    Everything works fine as long I don't apply the patch 120536-05 (updated video drivers and fixes).
    I mean the only reason I have for applying this patch is due to the "SUN Update Manager". It's the only one left. All the other patches are installed. I can work without the patch, it's only nice to have.
    As soon it is installed I get no longer a console outside of the windowmanager login screen.
    On the login screen I say "Command line". Then I have a blank Screen for about 1 minute. It flashes around 5 times in this minute and then I get back to the login screen.
    I think it's a bug in the patch. Any idea?
    Cheers El_Sol

    save a copy of the /etc/openwin/server/etc/OWconfig and or the /etc/X11/tX86config file it your have one, of running Xorg vs SUN X, then try running the kdmconfig -u and then the kdmconfig -v to reconfigure it.
    Open a sunsolve support ticket the contract support for your issue if it is reproducable and you can profice any errors on for Solaris 10 x86 is resonable if you already do not have one even if your on a whitebox clone, it's worrth looking into!
    http://www.sun.com/service/solaris10/index.jsp there is a feature that includes Interoperability Support for the $360

  • Where to obtain Update 3 for Solaris 10 x86

    Hello all,
    For some reason my smpatch is broken and won't download patches. I need to locate Update 3 for Solaris 10 x86 but with all the new changes to the website I'm completely lost and can't seem to find the download link.
    Can anyone help out?
    Thanks,
    Rob

    Hi
    google "download solaris", first hit, at the bottom of the page "Looking for prior versions of Oracle Solaris?"
    Here it says
    "Note 1: Previous versions of Solaris 10 are no longer necessary as the latest release includes support for all Solaris 10 supported platforms and includes important enhancements not found in earlier releases."
    and "Solaris 10 10/08" (aka Update 6) is the oldest available.
    Note that you now need a support contract to access all patches except for patches to the "Oracle Solaris" compiler (if installed) and to the patch system.
    Paul

  • Error compiling GCC 4.3.1 on Solaris 10 x86 (Update 5)

    I am getting error when building GCC 4.3.1 on Solaris 10 x86.
    Have any of you built GCC 4.3.1 on Sol 10 x86?
    Here's the background:
    $ cat /etc/release
    Solaris 10 5/08 s10x_u5wos_10 X86
    Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    Use is subject to license terms.
    Assembled 24 March 2008
    $ isainfo -x
    amd64: cx16 mon sse3 sse2 sse fxsr mmx cmov amd_sysc cx8 tsc fpu
    i386: cx16 mon sse3 sse2 sse fxsr mmx cmov sep cx8 tsc fpu
    $ isalist
    amd64 pentium_pro+mmx pentium_pro pentium+mmx pentium i486 i386 i86
    $ echo $PATH
    /usr/sfw/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X/bin:/etc:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/usr/bin
    $ ../gcc-4.3.1/configure program-suffix=-4.3.1 enable-languages=c,c++
    with-mpfr=/usr/local with-gmp=/usr/local
    with-gnu-as with-as=/usr/sfw/bin/gas
    without-gnu-ld with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld
    And here's the failure:
    /usr/local/src/gcc-4.3.1/s10i/./gcc/xgcc
    -B/usr/local/src/gcc-4.3.1/s10i/./gcc/
    -B/usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.10/bin/
    -B/usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.10/lib/
    -isystem /usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.10/include
    -isystem /usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.10/sys-include
    -O2 -O2 -g -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall
    -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
    -Wold-style-definition -isystem ./include -fPIC -g
    -DHAVE_GTHR_DEFAULT -DIN_LIBGCC2
    -D__GCC_FLOAT_NOT_NEEDED -shared
    -nodefaultlibs -Wl,-h,libgcc_s.so.1
    -Wl,-z,text -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-M,libgcc.map
    -o amd64/libgcc_s.so.1.tmp -g -fkeep-inline-functions
    -m64 -B./ muldi3s.o negdi2s.o lshrdi3s.o ashldi3s.o
    ashrdi3s.o
    cmpdi2s.o ucmpdi2s.o clearcache_s.o enableexecute_stack_s.o
    trampolines.o __main_s.o absvsi2s.o absvdi2s.o addvsi3s.o
    addvdi3s.o subvsi3s.o subvdi3s.o mulvsi3s.o mulvdi3s.o negvsi2s.o
    negvdi2s.o ctorss.o ffssi2s.o ffsdi2s.o clzs.o clzsi2s.o clzdi2s.o
    ctzsi2s.o ctzdi2s.o popcounttab_s.o popcountsi2s.o popcountdi2s.o
    paritysi2s.o paritydi2s.o powisf2s.o powidf2s.o powixf2s.o powitf2s.o
    mulsc3s.o muldc3s.o mulxc3s.o multc3s.o divsc3s.o divdc3s.o
    divxc3s.o divtc3s.o bswapsi2s.o bswapdi2s.o fixunssfsis.o
    fixunsdfsis.o fixunsxfsis.o fixsfdis.o fixdfdis.o fixxfdis.o fixtfdis.o
    fixunssfdis.o fixunsdfdis.o fixunsxfdis.o fixunstfdis.o floatdisfs.o
    floatdidfs.o floatdixfs.o floatditfs.o floatundisfs.o floatundidfs.o
    floatundixfs.o floatunditfs.o divdi3s.o moddi3s.o udivdi3s.o umoddi3s.o
    udivw_sdiv_s.o udivmoddi4s.o unwind-dw2_s.o unwind-dw2-fde_s.o unwind-sjlj_s.o
    gthr-gnat_s.o unwind-c_s.o emutls_s.o -lc && rm -f amd64/libgcc_s.so
    && if [ -f amd64/libgcc_s.so.1 ]; then mv -f amd64/libgcc_s.so.1 amd64/libgcc_s.so.1.backup; else true; fi
    && mv amd64/libgcc_s.so.1.tmp amd64/libgcc_s.so.1
    && ln -s libgcc_s.so.1 amd64/libgcc_s.so
    ld: fatal: unwind table: file /usr/local/src/gcc-4.3.1/s10i/./gcc/amd64/crtend.o: section .eh_frame:
    bad cie version 0: offset 0xfffffd7fffdfb700
    How do I build GCC 4.3.1 on Solaris x86?
    Thanks

    The bootstrap compiler is GCC 3.4.3.
    I tried Sun's assembler (/usr/ccs/bin/as) too and got another error (below)
    I also tried bootstrapping with Sun's Studio 12 compiler but that too failed.
    *$ pkginfo -x SUNWbinutils SMCbinut*
    SMCbinut binutils
    (x86) 2.17
    SUNWbinutils binutils - GNU binutils
    (i386) 11.10.0,REV=2005.01.08.01.09
    *$ whence gcc*
    /usr/sfw/bin/gcc
    *$ gcc -v*
    Reading specs from /usr/sfw/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.10/3.4.3/specs
    Configured with: /builds/sfw10-gate/usr/src/cmd/gcc/gcc-3.4.3/configure prefix=/usr/sfw with-as=/usr/sfw/bin/gas with-gnu-as with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld without-gnu-ld enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-shared
    Thread model: posix
    gcc version 3.4.3 (csl-sol210-3_4-branch+sol_rpath)
    The error this time is:
    /big1/usr.local.src/gcc-4.3.1/s10i/./gcc/xgcc -B/big1/usr.local.src/gcc-4.3.1/s10i/./gcc/ -B/usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.10/bin/ -B/usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.10/lib/ -isystem /usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.10/include -isystem /usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.10/sys-include -g -fkeep-inline-functions -m64 -O2 -O2 -g -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -isystem ./include -fPIC -g -DHAVE_GTHR_DEFAULT -DIN_LIBGCC2 -D__GCC_FLOAT_NOT_NEEDED -I. -I. -I../../.././gcc -I../../../../gcc-4.3.1/libgcc -I../../../../gcc-4.3.1/libgcc/. -I../../../../gcc-4.3.1/libgcc/../gcc -I../../../../gcc-4.3.1/libgcc/../include -DHAVE_CC_TLS -o gcov.o -MT gcov.o -MD -MP -MF gcov.dep -DLgcov -c ../../../../gcc-4.3.1/libgcc/../gcc/libgcov.c
    Assembler: libgcov.c
    "/var/tmp//ccYcw90K.s", line 1936 : Syntax error
    Near line: " repz cmpsb"

  • Keyboard messed up on Solaris 10 x86 after applying patch update

    I have run into a keyboard problem on my Solaris 10 desktop. The keyboard is messed up. When I type �root� then it echoes as �eiir�. It is a Solaris 10 x86 system with PS/2 keyboard. The keyboard layout is US-English and type is generic 104 keys. The keyboard works fine in text mode but gets messed up as soon as the graphical login screen comes up.
    The output for �eeprom kbd-type� is �kbd-type=US-English(104-Key)�.
    The output for �kbd -l� is
    �type=6
    layout=33 (0x21)
    delay(ms)=500
    rate(ms)=40�.
    Running command �showrev -p | grep 118966� shows �
    Patch: 118966-11 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWxorg-xkb, SUNWxorg-server, SUNWxorg-doc, SUNWxorg-graphics-ddx
    Patch: 118966-21 Obsoletes: Requires: 118860-01 Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWxorg-xkb, SUNWxorg-server, SUNWxorg-cfg, SUNWxorg-doc, SUNWxorg-graphics-ddx, SUNWxorg-client-programs
    The file /var/dt/Xerrors contains the following error �
    The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
    Error: No Symbols named "ralt_switch_multikey" in the include file "level3"
    Exiting
    Abandoning symbols file "basic"
    Error: Num_Lock added to symbol map for multiple modifiers
    Using Mod3, ignoring Mod2.
    Abandoning symbols file "default"
    My keyboard was working fine till around a couple of days back and messed up after performing updates with Sun Update Manager. The patch 118966-21 was installed during that update and so was patch 118844-30. I have not tried uninstalling either of these patches to see if that fixes the problem. Should I?
    Please help!!! Thanks�

    Problem solved... me the n00b...
    After reading the log in /var/dt/Xerrors more closely this time I found that it was trying to load module "Keyboard" for the device "Keyboard1" and was not able to find that module. The log was also suggesting that this module is deprecated and I should use "kbd" instead... Made the changes in xorg.conf and things are good now...

  • Solaris 10 x86  -  32/64 bit question

    I have a Sun X4500 running Solaris 10 x86. I am having problems installing a third party application because the vendor says their application only runs on the 64 bit platform. They say their application installer runs "uname -a" to determine the platform and our output says we are running 32 bit only. The application vendor went on the say that uname should indicate something like x86_64 or i386_64 to indicate that 64 bit support was installed. Our uname output is as follows:
    # uname -a
    SunOS storage1 5.10 Generic_125101-09 i86pc i386 i86pc
    The person who installed this server says he installed the 64 bit. I ran isainfo -v and got the following result which shows 64 bit was included at install.
    # isainfo -v
    64-bit amd64 applications
    sse3 sse2 sse fxsr amd_3dnowx amd_3dnow amd_mmx mmx cmov amd_sysc cx8
    tsc fpu
    32-bit i386 applications
    sse3 sse2 sse fxsr amd_3dnowx amd_3dnow amd_mmx mmx cmov amd_sysc cx8
    tsc fpu
    So my questions are: 1) Why doesn't uname indicate that 64 bit support was installed? and 2) What can I do after the fact to make uname indicate that 64 bit support really is installed so that I can get this application installed.

    Your uname output is already correct.
    You have Solaris on x86 architecture.
    That is all it will ever describe, no more and no less.
    Your isainfo output is correct.
    It confirms you are in an environment that can function on 32-bit and 64-bit "stuff" as needed.
    Your application vendor needs to re-think how their application confirms the environment and not just the underlying architecture.
    Perhaps they should not use uname
    but rather should parse from the more complex isainfo output.

  • Compling cups 1.3.5 on solaris 10 x86

    hello
    i try to install CUPS 1.3.5 on solaris 10 x86.
    configure ends normally
    but when i do "make"
    it ends like this:
    Linking cupsd...
    Symbole                 premi�re r�f�rence
    non d�fini                         dans le fichier
    ldap_initialize                     dirsvc.o
    ld: fatal :  Erreurs dans le r�f�rencement des symboles. Aucun r�sultat n'a �t� �crit dans cupsd
    collect2: ld a retourn� 1 code d'�tat d'ex�cution
    *** Error code 1
    The following command caused the error:
    gcc -L../cups -L../filter   -L/usr/local/lib:/opt/sfw/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/ccs/lib -R/usr/local/lib:/opt/sfw/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/ccs/lib
    -R/usr/local/cups/lib   -Wshadow -Wunused -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -fPIC -Os -g -o cupsd auth.o  banners.o  cert.o  classes.o  client.o
    conf.o  dirsvc.o  env.o  main.o  ipp.o  listen.o  job.o  log.o  network.o  policy.o  printers.o  process.o  quotas.o  removefile.o
    select.o  server.o  statbuf.o  subscriptions.o  sysman.o libmime.a \
    -lz  -lslp -lldap -lpam -ldl \
    -lcups  -lpthread -lresolv -lnsl -lsocket -lm \
    -lgss -L/usr/lib -R/usr/lib -I/usr/include/kerberosv5 -I/usr/local/lib -I/opt/sfw/lib -I/usr/lib -I/usr/ccs/lib -lkrb5
    make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `cupsd'
    Current working directory /Desktop/cups-1.3.5/scheduler
    *** Error code 1
    The following command caused the error:
    for dir in cups backend berkeley cgi-bin filter locale man monitor  notifier pdftops scheduler systemv test    conf data doc fonts p
    pd templates; do\
    echo Making all in $dir... ;\
    +(cd $dir ; make ) || exit 1;\+
    done
    make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `all'
    i set some environement variables before configure :
    export PATH="/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/ccs/bin:"$PATH
    export CFLAGS="-I/usr/local/lib -I/opt/sfw/lib -I/usr/lib -I/usr/ccs/lib"
    export CXXFLAGS="-I/usr/local/lib -I/opt/sfw/lib -I/usr/lib -I/usr/ccs/lib"
    export DSOFLAGS="-L/usr/local/lib:/opt/sfw/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/ccs/lib -R/opt/local/lib:/opt/sfw/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/ccs/lib"
    export LDFLAGS="-L/usr/local/lib:/opt/sfw/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/ccs/lib -R/usr/local/lib:/opt/sfw/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/ccs/lib"
    but the problem appears again

    Appears to be a bug.
    Applying Any Patch Set 10.1.x.x Fails During Configuration Assistant "Run One-Off Opatches" (Doc ID 1134259.1)

Maybe you are looking for