Is the cisco ironport c170 end of sale?

Hi,
I was wondering whether the Cisco Ironport C170 is end of sale?, if so what is the replacement?
Thanks

Hi Juan,
As far as I know C170 is not in end of sale.
You can verify with your Cisco Account contacts for more details.

Similar Messages

I have a cisco ironport c170, i want set up URL redirect? But i don't khow how to ? Can you help me?

I have a cisco ironport c170, i want set up URL redirect? But i don't khow how to ? Can you help me?

The C170 does not support URL redirection prior to OS release 8.5. What exactly do you need to accomplish?

What is the cisco ironport C680 and M680 configuration backup file size?

what is the cisco ironport C680 and M680 configuration backup file size?

Size of the XML itself? That is going to vary based on what you have configured, total lines of code, and # of appliances you may/may not have in cluster.
M680, based on SMA as stand-alone, should be similar --- you are probably looking @ < 1 MB...
Looking @ my test environment, in which I have a nightly cron job set to grab a backup of...
-rw-rw---- 1 robert robert 161115 Sep 26 02:00 C000V-564D1A718795ACFEXXXX-YYYYBAD60A5A-20140926T020002.xml
So, 161115 bytes = .15 MB
-Robert

Backup and restore quarantines cisco ironport c170

Hello,
Is there anyway to backup and restore the spams quarantine to another ironport c170?
Thanks in advance.
Alexandre

You have the wrong forum... Try posting it on this forum:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/community/netpro/security/ironport

Cisco Ironport C170

Hi ,
I already configure the ironport C170 for incoming , outgoing , Content Filtering and Antispam.
But Antispam is not working properly. If I send out the email , messsage hearder never show the ironport antispam.
I can see the Ironport Antivirus header only. How can we test the anti spam is working before we added the incoming
production domain to ironport? Please see in the pictures. Currently OS running with 8.0.1.Please help me check thanks,
Thanks,
infoakh

Please see the following:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/email-security-appliance/117865-qanda-esa-00.html
-Robert

Backup and restore logs, quarantines cisco ironport c170

Hello,
Is there anyway to backup and restore logs and quarantine to another ironport c170?
Thanks in advance.
Alexandre

Hello Alexandre,
logs can easily be downloaded via FTP or SCP, there is a folder per logs subscription, i.e.
/mail_logs
/system_logs
/error_logs
Each folder contains multiple logs, thos e are with extention .s are the ones that have rolled over, while .c and .current are the ones currently written to. I would not recommend to upload them to another appliance, as this may cause problems or at least confusion. Quarantines cannot be backed up, that functionality is limited to SMAs (M-series).
Hope that helps,
Andreas

A "Web Reputation Filters" key was downloadedfrom the Cisco Ironport key server.....

Recently we received an alert from our Ironport S370 appliance indicating that a new Web Reputation Filters key had been downloaded and placed into the pebnding area: EULA acceptance required. This key shows a 256 days validity however our current key still has 250 days left on it..... Why would a new key be downloaded when the old one still has so much time left on it? My undestanding is that a key is just used to enable a feature but being that the feature is already enabled and has several months of validity why would a new key be needed? I find it a little strange.
Thanks

When Web Reputation Filters (WBRS) expired, all web sites that accessed using WSA as Web proxy will not get any reputation score and the filtering in WSA policies based on reputation score will not function therefore if for example accessing web site that has bad reputation score and should be blocked automatically by WSA when WBRS in functioning will not happened and all sites will be accessible without reputation score filtering (expose threats and strongly recommend to validate the feature keys).

Requirement Email attachment configuration in Cisco Ironport C170

Dear All,
We have a requirement from one of the customer that they are asking to configure filters based on below condition
1.Internal user sending to Public Domain (Gmail, Yahoo,rediff..etc) without attachment
2. Internal user sending to Public Domain (Gmail, Yahoo,rediff..etc) with attachment
3.Internal user receveing from Public Domain (Gmail, Yahoo,rediff..etc) without attachment
4. Internal user receving from Public Domain (Gmail, Yahoo,rediff..etc) with attachment
I am unable to put nested if condition in the content filter. eg. if the user under condition 3(refer above) get an email with attachment it should quarantine.
Also, if the email is sent to multiple users (who are under condition 3 and 4) then emails should deliver for the user under condition 4 and email should get quarantined for the user under condition 3.
your assistance is appreciated.

Hi Arjun,
Best scalable solution is to use LDAP groups in the Incoming/Outgoing mail policies.
You can first configure an LDAP profile, with LDAP group query, then enable that query on listeners.
After that create Mail policies with members as recipients/senders from LDAP group.
By using Mail Policies, system will splinter (split) the messages if there are other recipients not member of that group.
Content Filters does not give an option to configure nested conditions. This can only be done using Message Filters from CLI -> filters command. However, Message filters work on whole message and are not per recipients.
I would recommend going through the Admin guide/online help to get all the details and differences between message filters and content filters.
Hope this will help.
Rehan

UC560 - license counts and end-of-sale for license upgrades?

One of our customers would like to keep their UC560 system in production for awhile, but we may need to add licenses.
First, with the UC560 now past end-of-sale, how long will we be able to buy license upgrades? I could not find any information when I tried searching. It looks like the distributors are still selling L-UC-PRO-8U=.
Second, how does Cisco count the UC560 licenses? (I'm sure I knew this when I went through the training courses.) Here is their current license summary:
#show platform software license
License UDI                  : UC560-FXO-K9:...
Maximum User Licenses        : 40
Used User Licenses           : 24
Available User Licenses      : 16
Base License                 : 24
CSL Base License             : 16
Max number of upgrade PAK allowed: 13
In one post, I read that the license count was based on the number of ephones. Based on this report, it looks like only registered ephones are being counted. It doesn't look like floating extensions or extension mobility user profiles count against the "Used User Licenses" total. Does that sound right?
Thanks! -dpm

Adobe doesn't care, they don't have to. I like Phsotoshop and have been using it professionally for 20 years, but lets face it, I wouldnt mind some really good competition from another source. It didnt use to be the only game in town, and doesnt have to remain so.
I could brainstorm how I would want competing software to look like. Pshop is not the easiest workflow possible. Illustrator is clearly deficient to even CorelDraw, and certainly Freehand. I've been meaning to reconnect with CorelDraw. It did some cool things.
Google Chrome is pulling a lot of manoevers software wise and I hope they try to go a little deeper and give Adobe a run for their money on the one program they feel justifies unbelievable gouging. Go investigate Ableton Live if you want to see what a company that cares about its customers is doing, ADOBE. Audition is a JOKE compared to Ableton Live. Thank God we're not powned on the audio side by these suits.
The idea that a company would peddle buggy software, which CS4 was..., although some of that was Apple's fault, is bad, the upgrade prices were ridiculous, and this is the end of the road for me currently. The idea that a company would actively
push away customers is pretty incredible. "But I sent you an email!" Whoops, you gotta pay $1900 for production premium CS6! HAHAHAHAHA. Time for a YT video with my old hard copy box. Sounds like a good idea.
There are too many options on the motion graphics side, and I'll keep a static machine to run Pshop and AE CS4.
The masters of the universe will have theit way, and the rest must bow to their ambivalent greed. At least that's the way they think. It would seem that Adobe and Apple really, really want some upstarts to come up. Maybe $360 for a year to figure out an exit might work. It will be interesting to see if this hits earnings. VERY interesting.

Ironport C170 Config file restore

Hi Team,
We have 2 clustered Ironport server with AsyncOS 7.5.2 with site 1 and now we are building new DR site for Exchange 2010 and buiding Ironport on DR site.
We have one ironport AsyncOS 7.6.2 for Cisco IronPort C170 build 201 at DR site.
We have to restore configuration file from Site 1 to DR site.
Can you please provide me the steps to restore the file from site 1 to DR site
I have removed the one node from ironport cluster from site 1 and taken the backup of the configuration file.
Regards,
Pravin

Pravin -
You will need to upgrade all appliances to the same revision in order to have the configuration used from site 1 to the DR. Also, 7.5.2 and 7.6.2 are EOL, and you would be strongly suggested to upgrade to the minimum of 7.6.3-019 for all appliances.
After that - it would just be a matter of looking at this two ways - while upgrading the appliances at site 1, just save the configuration copy once upgraded as needed to 7.6.3-019. Make a copy and modify the Network Configuration section: Hostname, Interface <IP>, Routing Table... and then load that copy on the DR site.
Or - the other way to look at it would be to just join the DR site to the cluster. That way all configuration is shared among the three appliances.
I hope this helps!
-Robert
(*If you have received the answer to your original question, and found this helpful/correct - please mark the question as answered, and be sure to leave a rating to reflect!)

Cisco IronPort Alert Notification 12/15/2011

To Cisco IronPort customers:
License key notification emails that were sent from Cisco IronPort yesterday between 11am and 4PM PST and that appear to have incorrect end dates can be disregarded. The key information within those emails contained old data. Customers can view their correct license key information through the Cisco IronPort appliance GUI.
We sincerely apologize for any confusion this has caused.
Best regards,
Cisco IronPort

Hi, this is a (XML) report generated by AutoSupport feature. It contains information about alerts, uptime, output of status command etc.
AutoSupport is used by Cisco to better support and design future system changes and it can be used for some troubleshooting purposes also.
AutoSupport can be enabled/disabled in System Administration -> Alerts -> Alert Settings.
You can choose to send these reports only to the Cisco and not to send weekly reports to system users configured on the appliance by removing checkbox "Send copy of weekly AutoSupport reports to System Information Alert recipients.". Reports are sent to users configured to receive system alerts (info level).

Cisco IronPort Plug-In 7.3 breaks when multiple profiles are used?

In our testing of the Cisco IronPort Plug-In 7.3 we found that if seperate Outlook profiles are used that are configured to different e-mail accounts the plug-in gives an error.
Here's the scenario.
Profile A configured with [email protected] up and running receives the BCS Configuratoin File and the plug-in recognizes it and enables the ENCRYPT button.   User1 can use Outlook along with ENCRYPT and all works well.
But, if that same workstation users opens a different Outlook mail profile is opened that is configured to a different e-mail account. Profile B configured with [email protected] the following error is generated: "An error occurred during C:\ProgramData\Cisco\Cisco IronPort Email Security Plug-in\user1\config_2.xml configuartion file initialization. Some settings have been set to the default values."   Outlook works fine, the decrypt button is greyed out, which is expected, [email protected] is not ENCRYPT enabled.
The problem is when the user opens up Profile A again, a different error occurs "
"An error occurred during C:\ProgramData\Cisco\Cisco IronPort Email Security Plug-in\user1\config_1.xml configuartion file initialization. Some settings have been set to the default values." and the ENCRYPT button is still disabled, even though this user is authorized for ENCRYPTION.   At this point the user has to open the BCS Configuration File again, which does give the message 'This message contains a secure attachment with settings for [email protected] Do you want to apply these settings?".   If they answer YES, the ENCRYPT button is re-enabled.
Is Cisco aware of this?   What is the resolution?
Thanks.

Same workstation AD login that has full access to both e-mail accounts.
Email account A profile A is the same as the workstation login used.   Email account B profile B is a different e-mail address / AD object but user A has full access to the mailbox.
I would expect Encryption to work for Profile A and not for Profile B, e-mail address B was never sent the configuration file. But when I go back to use Profile A, encryption is no longer enabled, requireing me to run the configuration again.

Cisco IronPort Customer Support - Alert

Dear Cisco IronPort customers.
As of 2:30PM PST 08/06/2010 the Cisco IronPort Customer Support ticketing system experienced a system problem that may prevent customers from being able to view their open support tickets. If you are encountering a new Cisco IronPort appliance problem or need an update on an existing problem, please call us at (877) 641-IRON or (650) 989-6533.
We hope to have this problem resolved within the hour, and appologize for the inconvenience.
Cisco IronPort Customer Support Management

Update As of 3:32PM PST the Cisco IronPort Customer Support ticketing system problem has been resolved. Customer should be able to view their tickets and ticket updates at this time.

Cisco IronPort Knowledgebase Retired

I tried accessing the Cisco IronPort KB this morning only to find out that all articles have been removed. You are now supposed to utilize the TechNotes in the respective product page. How on earth are you supposed find anything in this convoluted mess? Am I really supposed to utilize the search bar in the upper right corner that searches through everything on the Cisco website? Clicking on each Subject item (i.e. Troubleshooting Technotes) is extremely inefficient and most of the time you don't find what you're looking for.

Sorry to hear that Mark. In being the one that implemented this change, and the preliminary project to migrate the old articles over to the Cisco.com publishing standards, I'll be happy to take the feedback. This was noted to occur previous to now:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/blog/12176911/updated-access-customer-knowledge-base
I am already aware of some users unhappiness w/ the search aspects of the TechNotes.
Previously - the search mechanism was the same, albeit that was limited to the knowledge base articles per our previous board's engine. Currently - we have to adhere to Cisco's publishing standards in writing and presenting our knowledge base articles - and that was one of the primary drivers for the change. I hope that you'll find the articles at least a little more clean and uniform in presentation. If not - you can submit feedback directly on the articles, and we take the results of what people find useful/not useful very seriously, and appreciate the feedback.
From within the advanced search - you can use the "ESA" tag when searching, it will limit results presented from Cisco.com. It will return result directly relating to the Email Security Appliance:
http://tools.cisco.com/search/results/en/us/get/advsrch?q=ESA
Happy to help or address concerns that you have - just reach out to me and let me know - [email protected]
-Robert

Cisco Ironport

Cisco Ironport S370 is able to fetch only 1000 users from the AD, while testing. There are more than 5000 users in the AD. Is there a limiitation ?

Hi sridharmohanraj21,
As far as i know the license for Cisco Ironport is only for the license itself and not per user but i will check you need any additional license for this. what type of license do you currently have for the Cisco Ironport?
Thanks,
Ferdinand Guasque
[email protected]

Is the cisco ironport c170 end of sale?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for