Is the iPhone 5c better than the 4 or 4s?

My son dropped his iPhone several times, so we are looking to replace it. The 5c in green is his choice. Is this iPhone better than or the same as the 4/s generation? He does not need a super phone, he does a lot of texting and some game apps, as well as things like dictionary apps. Yes, he does call sometimes. Any comparisons would be helpful in choosing his next iPhone.

The 4 and 4S are discontinued. The 5c is essentially the original 5 in a plastic housing. Yes, it's better.

Similar Messages

  • Is the iPhone 5 better than the Samsung Galaxy S4/Lumia 1020?

    Is the iPhone 5 better than the Samsung Galaxy S4/Lumia 1020?

    Like almost everything in this world is a matter of choice, but, if it is to logically make a choice here are a few criteria you should consider before picking up a smartphone:
    Do you really need it? - if not, the money will stay better in your account;
    Set up the budget and consider the fact that smartphones get upgrades faster than computers and laptops, will you be able to upgrade?
    Which operating system are you familiar with?
    What are your needs and expectations from the smartphone?
    What type of person you are (email/chat/SMS/Social Media-man aka. communications, multimedia, productivity, gamer, etc.) this will help you chose the appropriate hardware and check out what are your options regarding the existing applications for your needs;
    Are you always on the run or work in an office? - this will help you decide from the battery life point of view;
    If you own a tablet you might just need a simple smartphone.
    Samsung does not really innovate in terms of functionality and usability, they only copy what others do and make it their own way. Android is not a mature operating system, yet. I like some of its features, of course, but I can rely on it when it comes to productivity as I'm a person who sends 100's of emails per day and need to easily manage the messages.
    You can have the best hardware in the world but that's useless if you operating system is bad at managing those resources, you will not be able to exploit the device to the fullest and you might cry over the money you've spent :-) Nevertheless Samsung has a large market share, makes good phones, but not quite smart, they are rather... intelligent, a smartphone is smart from the day you buy it, you don't have to put it in training mode :-)
    As about Lumia, I don't have much to say, it's what iPhone had at the iPhone 4 version minus the 40MP camera and the operating system. If I want a good camera then I buy a camera, a Canon or Nikon :-) Yes, the Krait CPU, so what? That CPU is managed by a Wi*dows OS and that should say everything. I'm not against Micr*soft, they had/have their part in technology progress, but I'm more into stable operating systems, I'd chose Android over Wi*dows, yet Nokia were always great at hardware and batery life. Bad choice for Nokia, look at their sales and you will understand.
    That's just my two cents, but iPhone is the choice of millions when they chose their first smartphone: is user friendly, solid, great hardware specs, lovely screen, wonderful support, high-level security, multimedia at its best, a design that catches the eye, looks and feels great in your hand, it's light, you have millions of verified apps in the store and a nice community to tell you all these :-)

  • What is the range of an Airport Express 2nd generation? The range is better than the 1st generation?

    What is the range of an Airport Express 2nd generation? The range is better than the 1st generation?

    150 feet in clear space with no obstructions in the signal path.  It is not possible to predict range with any obstructions in the signal path.

  • Is the external isight better than the internal?

    I have a macbook, but I am considering purchasing an external isight as well. I know the external has auto focus (I do not believe the internal does) but I am more interested in color. Does the external have better color and low-light picture? Is the same 1/4 inch chip from the external used in the internal, or is the internal a lessor chip?
    I enjoy the macbooks isight, but I would like to make some movies with iMovie. The internal is not overly impressive with it's colors when doing this. Sharpness is also not excellent, it seems the external will definitly improve upon this.
    Any input is greatly appreciated. I would really like to hear from owners of both cameras who could possibly compare and contrast these two.
    Kalel

    Hi Kalel,
    I agree with Eddie. I have an external mounted on my G5 at the office and an internal on an Intel iMac at home. If nothing else, the ability to reposition makes the external the hands down winner.
    Personally, I believe the external records ambient light better than the internal, but I have different lighting situations at both locations.
    Both the internal and external have autofocus.
    One of the best additions you can get for either one is a program called iGlasses. I has been mentioned many times in this forum with plenty of user comments.
    Good Luck
    John

  • Is the 17 inch better than the 15 inch mac book pro?

    Which one is better to get and use? 15 or 17 inch?

    I have both. One is not necessarily better than the other, really depends on what you plan on using the computer for. Even though the 17" is classified as a portable computer, IMO it's not very portable at all. Go to a store, view handle each for yourself. The 17" is quite large, mine sits on a desk as a desktop replacement. In terms of performance, equipped the same(processor, RAM & GPU), there is only about a 3% performance gain with the 17". Not enough to write home about. The big advantage of the 17" is screen real estate. But, if you want portability, get the 15".

  • Is the nokia 7390 better than the 6290

    this might seem like silly question but I am hoping someone could help me on this.
    I recently perchased a 6290 and think its agreat phone however someone told me brifley about it
    I have tryed to compare the two but am having trouble with my computer

    The 6290 is a series 60 smartphone that was released around the middle of this year.
    The 7390 is a series 40 fashion phone that was released late last year or early this year.
    The 6290 is a has more features and the abilty to accept more programs but the 7390 has a better camera and smoother operating system.
    If you prefer smartphones then the 6290 is the better phone but if you prefer fashion phones the the 7390 is better.
    It's a case of S40 phone versus S60 phone, neither is better than the other, just different.

  • Is the 70D significantly better than the 7D at handling high ISO situations?

    I have a 6D and it has really spoiled me with it's low noise high ISO capabilities. I'm wondering if the 70D is significantly better than my 7D when it comes to handling high ISOs. It has the same sensor as the 6D and I really like that view screen on the 70D.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    The 6D has a "full frame" sensor - physical dimensions are close to the 36mm x 24mm size of a 35mm film negative frame.
    Both the 7D and 70D have APS-C sensors - physical dimensions are close to 22mm x 15mm and close to the same size of a negative frame from "Advanced Photo System - Class" size film.
    While the 7D and 70D have sensors which are roughly the same size, the sensors themselves are very different because the 70D has the new dual-pixel AF technology.
    Tim Campbell
    5D II, 5D III, 60Da

  • Does the iPhone developer beta disable the phone's radio?

    Multiple reports have said that installing the iPhone developer test software will disable the phone's radio, making it impossible to make calls -- unless the phone is unlocked, which I don't want to do. In the experience of other people who have been accepted into the program, is this true?

    Nevermind, please direct replies to http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1461594&tstart=0

  • Is the complimentary bottom replacement on the Macbook made better than the defected one?

    I just ordered another Macbook bottom and I was wondering if i'm just getting another defected one or did they actually fix the problem?

    We all have different priorities and needs.  For me the most meaningful change in the newer MBPs is the USB 3 connectivity.  Much faster than USB 2 or Firewire.  This is important when transferring data to and from external HDDs.  Note that in the 13" MBPs, one still can install larger HDDs if the need arises.
    Ciao.

  • Is the hardcover photobook better than the softcover one?

    I was just wondering, because I really don't know which one to buy. It is for my girlfriend, I'm moving away for a year or so and we won't see each other so it's a leaving present. I really it want it to look good, and last for a long time. So which one would be best for me? Thanks.

    That is strictly a personal choice - for me the hard cover is best - but others like the softcover - your pays your money and takes your choice
    LN

  • IPod better than the nano?

    Do you think that the nano is better than the real iPods? I think that the real iPod is better than the nano because it has all the same features as the nano execpt the nano is smaller. But the real iPod makes up for that by having more songs than the nanos. So what do you think?

    i love my nano its the best.
    Nano 4GB black,Moto RAZR V3 black, PSP, all kinds of cases for nano,radio/remote   Windows XP   <img src="http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e13/superman5656/s.gif"align="right"</span>

  • Is the reception of iPhone 5c better than 5s.

    Was advised at a Telstra store that the reception of the iPhone 5s was worse than that of the 5c. Am thinking of upgrading from 4s.
    Has anyone experienced this?

    Not sure about the 5C but the 5S is hugely worse than the 4S for data. And tethering is a dead loss in poor signal areas where it would work reliably with the 4S.
    However it's not that simple - the 5S voice call performance seems BETTER than the 4S. I did a 45 minute call yesterday during a drive through several known blackspots where my 4S and indeed other non-Apple phones reliably drop the call, and not only did the 5S maintain the call but I didn't even have any dropped audio at all.
    But despite the audio being solid I couldn't get ANY data out of it at all - and yes it was on 3G so should have been able to do voice and data simultaneously.
    So my guess is a serious bug in the firmware or baseband around data handling rather than inherently poorer hardware in the 5S. Or at least that's what I hope as one wouldn't expect a newer phone to be worse than the previous model especially after the bizarre mess of the iPhone 4 and antennagate!

  • Is the battery life better on the iphone 5s than on the iphone 5?

    Is the battery life better on the iphone 5s than on the iphone 5?

    I have the iPhone 5s and my wife has the iPhone 5.  They both last a few days between charges.
    I am not sure that I can tell a difference, as I use mine less than she uses hers, but they both seem to last.

  • ATI Radeon HD 4870 not better than the Nvidea Geforce 120?

    I bought av new ATI Radeon HD 4870 card to my MacPro. But are wery disappointed. My old NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 performes almost better than ATI. I ran Cinebench test and this is the results:
    *NVIDIA GeForce*
    Rendering (Single CPU): 3225 CB-CPU
    Rendering (Multiple CPU): 18880 CB-CPU
    Multiprocessor Speedup: 5.85
    Shading (OpenGL Standard): 6107 CB-GFX
    *ATI Radeon HD 4870*
    Rendering (Single CPU): 3218 CB-CPU
    Rendering (Multiple CPU): 18852 CB-CPU
    Multiprocessor Speedup: 5.86
    Shading (OpenGL Standard): 5846 CB-GFX
    I also ran the Photoshop Actiontest from www.retouchartists.com on a large .tiff file, and my ATI Radeon used 1,10,2 and NVidea used 1,09,4. That is almost 1 second better for the old card.
    Apple says that the ATI 4870 card performs 2x better than the Nvidea 120. That is not my experience!

    Hello,
    I currently have a 2008 3.0Ghz Harpertown mac pro and I am trying to figure out what to do here. I just purchased the 24 inch cinema display, but yet I have a nice 1GB 4870 ati radeon I got off ebay. Its more powerful than the Apple version, but lacks the mini-display port.
    Currently, I have the ATI RADEON 2600 XT connected, though inactive, while my 4870 is active.
    So, should I just get the Nvidia GT 120 and keep my 1GB 4870, or should I get rid of the 4870 I have and just buy Apple's? Either way, the GT 120 works in a 2008 mac pro despite what Apple says on their site that it only works in 2009 mac pros.

  • When transferring volumes to a new drive, is a cloning app better than the finder?

    When transferring volumes to a new drive, is a cloning app better than the finder?
    I’m adding a new (bigger) external hard drive.  I have created five partions on it as the old drive has.  Is it, better, faster, more accurate, etc. to use an app, or just drag and drop the folders on to the new partitions.  The sofware I have are; TechTool6, Drive Genius3 & SuperDuper.  Two of the partitons have a Mac OS on them.  The others just have files.
    Thanks,
    Larry

    If the drive is to be functional as a boot drive then cloning is the better approach as it will grab all hidden configuration files and preserve the file access permissions properly; however, if you are setting up a data drive then the Finder's copy options should be adequate. To ensure file permissions are properly attributed to the copied files, select them and press Command-C to copy, followed by Shift-Option-Command-V to paste the items in the new location and preserve their file attributes (you may need to authenticate when copying them in this manner). If you do not need to preserve permissions then a basic drag-and-drop copy should suffice.

Maybe you are looking for