Is the new version of the bios worth going to?

This is more a generaly question about the BIOS. currently. my system works fine (i think.. havn't had much time to really test it, as i just got it up last night), and I figure if i'm going to flash the bios, i may as well do it now before i get too far into getting it tweaked and set up the way i like it.
so.... is it worth the risk to flash the BIOS? i've never done a bios flash before, so i want to be sure it's something that won't kill my board, as i already went through hell getting it from a supplier in the first place.
any suggestions?

whoops! no i have the K8T neo FIS2R.... i must have missed that line when i grabbed your example Sig. i shall update it.

Similar Messages

  • I am trying to install a newer version of iTunes. It goes to the end of the install and cannot remove the older version. Now it does not work at all. Help!

    Trying to uninstall an older version of iTune on a PC running XP pro.  It goes to end of install and has a conflict. Uninstalls the new version, but will not reload the older version.  No iTunes will boot up.

    It goes to end of install and has a conflict.
    What's the precise text of the error message you get at that stage, please?

  • Using Vista operating system Firefox Version 3.05 tried to update to new version but after download it goes to run then my only option is save the file it will not run the file.

    the firefox set 7.01 up file can be downloaded but will not run do I have to update to 4 the 5 up to 7?
    download run setup
    unable too run setup everytime

    The longer this thread continues, the more ancillary comments you throw in that aren't directly pertinent to your problem with your DVR software not working with Firefox 4.0. Sorry, I don't intend to continue with this discussion.
    I do agree that ''something'' needs to be done better with regards to plugins for Firefox, but I do disagree with you as to whose responsibility that ''something'' is.

  • New version of communicator

    Dear Nokia,
    I have been using communicators since 2004: 9210i, 9500 & now E90 since 2007.
    Now. My E90 is in bad shape just bcoz i have been waiting4 the new version. Never felt like going to apple or android phones. My friends also use the same e90 & they are also waiting as we had formed a small club of communicator owners. The wait for the new model has been agonizingly long, i m sure people at Nokia are just not concerned with this& u guys do not realise what this phone means to us as a part of our lifestyle. Pls let us know if nokia has scrapped the idea of launching anynew model for this royal series of phones. Its important pls understand this as an obligation to people like us.
    Thanks
    Rahul

    hi rahulshiv76!
    your post has made me emotional, but let me get to the point.
    1. only symbi-sister (s80/s60) had the nerve & cheek to handle 2 screens as in the communicators. present S^3 is not tested for dual screens, atleast publicly.
    2. ansi v of nokia has made it violently clear that E7 is the new communicator, his presentation is in the youtube.stephen e of nokia has made it morbidly clear that nokia's "the" platform is WP.
    3. Only during 2011 A.D.,  WP7.5 has just started handling simple functions one by one (not completely but 1by1), those, that 6630 did way back in 1200 BC. Dual screens, therefore, is way beyond the capacity of WP7.5. May be in future, i do not know, but definitely cannot imagine.
    4. I however agree with you, Nokia SHOULD consider a market / revenue opportunity for Communicator Owners (like its Vertu (which got cancelled anyway)).
    5. Me being "a Communicator", i have given up. E7 is my last nokia, until "something happens" and symbi sister is back.
    6. But who can stop me from wishing an improvement of E90:
    a. 4.5" inner capacitive multi-touch screen
    b. 2" outer screen without touch
    c. Penta band 3G / LTE / quad band GSM
    d. Infra red
    e. BT v.4 (read somewhere it is in the works)
    f. Aluminium body
    g. Removable 2000mA battery
    h. 32/ 64 g microSD slot
    i. 1gb RAM, 1gb ROM
    j. All vid codecs
    k. better music player with dolby surround (samsung omniapro B7610 had way back in 2009)
    l. better email client with twin views - folder+content, like the E90 viewed SMSs & IMAP/POP emails
    and the list can go on, and we can all dream on.

  • I've tried the new iWork and feel cheated. I'm gonna stick with my old '09 version. It appears to have lost utility, and is now easily surpassed by Word 07. Is a new version that's worth the money and hype coming?

    I've tried the new iWork (on a friend's new MacBook Pro) and feel very disappointed. I'm gonna stick with my old '09 version. It appears to have lost utility, and is now easily surpassed by Word 07. Dear Apple, from a veteran user: In your rush to market, you have dropped the basket on this one! Is a new version that's worth the money and hype coming?

    Welcome to Apple Support Communities
    A lot of users have complained about the lack of features of the new iWork version. However, I'm sure Apple will add features with more updates in the future, like with Final Cut Pro X. See > http://support.apple.com/kb/HT6049?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US
    Until then, you can carry on using iWork '09, or try Microsoft Office 2011 or even LibreOffice, which is free and open-source

  • New NF980-G65 with an AMD X6 1090T and the BIOS Update Utility Crashes?

    Last week I received my new NF980-G65 board and with it an AMD Phenom II X6 1090T (Thuban 3.2GHz Socket AM3).  After installing the board and starting it up for the first time I noticed that it reports BIOS version 1.1 and CPU unknown.  Next I downloaded the BIOS update to version 1.3 from msi, made a boot USB stick and powered up again.  System will not boot from USB.  I tried now over 20 different sticks from 256MB to 64GB and none of them worked!
    Went back to my old system and ripped its floppy drive out to install it in the new computer.  Had to go to RadioShack since I have not touched a floppy in over 10 years, but they had some on clearance.  Made me a boot disk, put the new BIOS and install utility on it, booted the system with the floppy, started the BIOS update utility and watched it crash.  When I start it by itself it gives me three screens of options and commands, but as soon as I try to use one of the commands or update the BIOS it keeps crashing.
    What do I have to do to get the BIOS on the NF980-G65 updated so it will run with my AMD X6 1090T processor?
    Thank you in advance for ANY help...
    Tyler

    Quote
    I am sorry, but I need to work with this thing since I make a living writing code, I do not play with it!  This thing and the support I am getting for it are not worth my time or money!
    What thing are you talking about?  You are experiencing the a certain symptom for which you do not know the cause.  For some strange reason and without any in-depth tests you seem to assume that the board must be the problem (ignoring all other components (for example your factory overclocked memory modules).
    Quote
    the support I am getting for it are not worth my time or money!
    What support have you tried to get that actually has to do anything with money?  Please note that this is not MSI Technical Support but a User-to-User forum, run by users (just like you) that do not get paid for donating their private time to try to help others.  Whatever your level of frustration is in regards to the money spent for your components, please do not use it to insult anyone here in this forum.
    Quote
    The result remains the same, the update utility keeps crashing...
    Are still using the same floppy drive with the same floppy disk in it?
    What is your current BIOS-Version?
    Quote
    BIOS update utility
    What version? What is the exact file name of that utility?
    Quote
    ade me a boot disk
    How/Based on what DOS Version?

  • Tecra S5 - Is it worth to update the BIOS?

    I bought a Tecra S5 notebook recently and yesterday I noticed an update of the BIOS in the Toshiba website.
    I googled alot and also searched this forum and found a lot of threads about people having problems after updating (flashing) their BIOS. So I want to ask if the update is worth it, and if somebody owning a S5 has done it. Also could somebody tell me if there is a way to ensure you can roll back previous BIOS version after an update goes wrong?
    The notebook is precious to me and since living in this financial crisis time means I won't be able to buy a new one if I screw this up I want to be sure. Thanks in advance.
    EDIT: Forgot to mention that I installed Vista 64 due to having 4 GB of RAM.

    Hello
    First of all a BIOS update is not necessary if your notebooks runs smoothly. Never touch a running system ;)
    A BIOS update is only advisable if you have problem with it, for example not properly recognized RAM modules or so.
    I only update the BIOS of my notebook if I have problems with it and that means I updated the BIOS on my Toshiba notebooks 3 times as yet. Im not a Tecra S5 owner but I never had a problem with the BIOS updates. Some people who reported that the BIOS update failed did forget to read some instructions how to do that:
    Before you start a BIOS update you should close all running programs and close all background processes that you dont need. Also your antivirus and firewall should be disabled and must be logged in as administrator. Dont forget to connect the AC/DC adaptor before you start it.
    If you follow these tips normally the BIOS update should be done successfully.
    A BIOS downgrade to an older version can only be done from anuthroized service provider. That means you can downgrade it yourself.
    But newer versions are pretested from Toshiba and should not cause more problems as before. Newer BIOS versions fix problems.
    I hope I could help you a little bit! :)
    Greets

  • Every time I update LR to a new version I seem to need a patch to make it work..... once again here I am SOS! I've just update LR to the 5.7 version and It wont let me start it: The application was unable to start correctly (0xc000007b).

    Every time I update LR to a new version I seem to need a patch to make it work..... once again here I am SOS! I've just update LR to the 5.7 version and It wont let me start it: The application was unable to start correctly (0xc000007b).

    Your system is missing a couple DLLs that LR needs, but the fix at Adobe is to copy them to the LR folder which gets replaced for each install, so you have to redo it after each LR install.  It would be worth documenting the process and saving the DLLs so you don’t have to ask about it each time:
    http://helpx.adobe.com/lightroom/kb/error-unable-start-correctly-0xc00007b.html
    You might also use the AIO210 program to add them as detailed in this YouTube video—maybe this is a more permanent fix, but since the files are from media-fire be very careful about what you do so as not to install a virus on your computer. 
    I’d scan the downloaded ZIP you download with whatever virus and internet security software you have and don’t be fooled by extraneous popups you might see during the download process.  I was able to download the aio210.zip after authorizing one Captcha window and closed at least one bogus popup trying to get me to install other software.  I also scanned the downloaded zip with two virus scanners and both said it was clean.  Here is the YouTube video, where the link to the ZIP to download is in the description once you expand it:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlT0N2CX50g

  • FIFO Underruns in newer versions of Linux using the Ivy Bridge cpus

    I have been getting consistent results from my Lenovo Z580 where an error will apear when upgrading to a newer version of linux past 3.15.8. More specifically a "[drm:cpt_serr_int_handler] *ERROR* PCH transcoder A FIFO underrun".  This also includes transcoder B.
    I found the bug report https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/40952?p … sort2=desc  which near to the bottom of the page someone has stated building the kernel from git fixes the issue. There was aslo some reports on updating the bios to solve the issue but on the bios I have is current based on the lenovo support site http://support.lenovo.com/us/en/product … s/DS100928.
    lscpu info:
    Architecture: x86_64
    CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
    Byte Order: Little Endian
    CPU(s): 4
    On-line CPU(s) list: 0-3
    Thread(s) per core: 2
    Core(s) per socket: 2
    Socket(s): 1
    NUMA node(s): 1
    Vendor ID: GenuineIntel
    CPU family: 6
    Model: 58
    Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3210M CPU @ 2.50GHz
    Stepping: 9
    CPU MHz: 1210.253
    CPU max MHz: 3100.0000
    CPU min MHz: 1200.0000
    BogoMIPS: 4990.71
    Virtualization: VT-x
    L1d cache: 32K
    L1i cache: 32K
    L2 cache: 256K
    L3 cache: 3072K
    NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-3
    lspci info
    00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core processor DRAM Controller (rev 09)
    00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller (rev 09)
    00:14.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family USB xHCI Host Controller (rev 04)
    00:16.0 Communication controller: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family MEI Controller #1 (rev 04)
    00:1a.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family USB Enhanced Host Controller #2 (rev 04)
    00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family High Definition Audio Controller (rev 04)
    00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port 1 (rev c4)
    00:1c.1 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port 2 (rev c4)
    00:1c.2 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port 3 (rev c4)
    00:1d.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family USB Enhanced Host Controller #1 (rev 04)
    00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation HM76 Express Chipset LPC Controller (rev 04)
    00:1f.2 SATA controller: Intel Corporation 7 Series Chipset Family 6-port SATA Controller [AHCI mode] (rev 04)
    00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family SMBus Controller (rev 04)
    02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8101E/RTL8102E PCI Express Fast Ethernet controller (rev 05)
    03:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation Centrino Wireless-N 2200 (rev c4)
    lsmod info
    Module Size Used by
    fuse 84249 3
    ctr 3927 2
    ccm 8278 2
    xt_tcpudp 3207 3
    ipt_MASQUERADE 2250 1
    ip6t_rpfilter 1740 1
    ip6t_REJECT 3980 18
    ipt_REJECT 2505 20
    xt_conntrack 3425 7
    ebtable_nat 1916 0
    ebtable_filter 1927 0
    ebtable_broute 1493 0
    bridge 100134 1 ebtable_broute
    stp 1653 1 bridge
    llc 3729 2 stp,bridge
    ebtables 24586 3 ebtable_broute,ebtable_nat,ebtable_filter
    ip6table_raw 1352 1
    ip6table_mangle 1620 1
    ip6table_filter 1556 1
    ip6table_security 1372 1
    ip6table_nat 3585 1
    nf_conntrack_ipv6 9661 5
    nf_defrag_ipv6 26126 1 nf_conntrack_ipv6
    nf_nat_ipv6 3736 1 ip6table_nat
    ip6_tables 17729 5 ip6table_filter,ip6table_mangle,ip6table_security,ip6table_nat,ip6table_raw
    iptable_raw 1348 1
    iptable_mangle 1616 1
    iptable_filter 1552 1
    iptable_security 1368 1
    iptable_nat 3454 1
    nf_conntrack_ipv4 9474 4
    nf_defrag_ipv4 1499 1 nf_conntrack_ipv4
    nf_nat_ipv4 3728 1 iptable_nat
    nf_nat 13368 5 ipt_MASQUERADE,nf_nat_ipv4,nf_nat_ipv6,ip6table_nat,iptable_nat
    nf_conntrack 80172 9 ipt_MASQUERADE,nf_nat,nf_nat_ipv4,nf_nat_ipv6,xt_conntrack,ip6table_nat,iptable_nat,nf_conntrack_ipv4,nf_conntrack_ipv6
    ip_tables 18115 5 iptable_security,iptable_filter,iptable_mangle,iptable_nat,iptable_raw
    x_tables 17344 17 iptable_security,ip6table_filter,ip6table_mangle,ip6t_rpfilter,ip_tables,xt_tcpudp,ipt_MASQUERADE,ip6table_security,xt_conntrack,iptable_filter,ip6table_raw,ebtables,ipt_REJECT,iptable_mangle,ip6_tables,iptable_raw,ip6t_REJECT
    uvcvideo 74983 0
    videobuf2_vmalloc 3368 1 uvcvideo
    videobuf2_memops 2239 1 videobuf2_vmalloc
    videobuf2_core 30407 1 uvcvideo
    arc4 2064 2
    videodev 123032 2 uvcvideo,videobuf2_core
    coretemp 6388 0
    rts5139 313272 0
    iwldvm 170735 0
    media 12611 2 uvcvideo,videodev
    hwmon 3346 1 coretemp
    joydev 10367 0
    mousedev 10912 0
    snd_hda_codec_hdmi 40396 1
    led_class 3611 1 iwldvm
    intel_rapl 12460 0
    x86_pkg_temp_thermal 7311 0
    mac80211 495361 1 iwldvm
    intel_powerclamp 9442 0
    kvm_intel 135528 0
    snd_hda_codec_realtek 54803 1
    snd_hda_codec_generic 56366 1 snd_hda_codec_realtek
    snd_hda_intel 22831 4
    snd_hda_controller 22975 1 snd_hda_intel
    snd_hda_codec 104665 5 snd_hda_codec_realtek,snd_hda_codec_hdmi,snd_hda_codec_generic,snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_controller
    kvm 408583 1 kvm_intel
    iTCO_wdt 5663 0
    psmouse 94918 0
    iTCO_vendor_support 1929 1 iTCO_wdt
    pcspkr 2059 0
    microcode 17157 0
    serio_raw 5073 0
    snd_hwdep 6652 1 snd_hda_codec
    evdev 11784 14
    snd_pcm 83207 4 snd_hda_codec_hdmi,snd_hda_codec,snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_controller
    ideapad_laptop 10439 0
    ac 3595 0
    thermal 9103 0
    sparse_keymap 3242 1 ideapad_laptop
    battery 7885 0
    iwlwifi 148746 1 iwldvm
    r8169 59191 0
    mii 4251 1 r8169
    cfg80211 437959 3 iwlwifi,mac80211,iwldvm
    snd_timer 19294 1 snd_pcm
    snd 61276 16 snd_hda_codec_realtek,snd_hwdep,snd_timer,snd_hda_codec_hdmi,snd_pcm,snd_hda_codec_generic,snd_hda_codec,snd_hda_intel
    wmi 8539 0
    rfkill 15971 3 cfg80211,ideapad_laptop
    shpchp 25706 0
    mei_me 10096 0
    mei 66784 1 mei_me
    lpc_ich 14008 0
    mac_hid 3273 0
    soundcore 5551 2 snd,snd_hda_codec
    i2c_i801 11364 0
    processor 25153 0
    ext4 494420 2
    crc16 1359 1 ext4
    mbcache 9155 1 ext4
    jbd2 82948 1 ext4
    algif_skcipher 6387 0
    af_alg 5020 1 algif_skcipher
    dm_crypt 17527 1
    dm_mod 85258 3 dm_crypt
    sr_mod 15026 0
    cdrom 35191 1 sr_mod
    sd_mod 37554 3
    crc_t10dif 1135 1 sd_mod
    atkbd 17006 0
    libps2 4571 2 atkbd,psmouse
    crct10dif_pclmul 4714 1
    crct10dif_common 1436 2 crct10dif_pclmul,crc_t10dif
    crc32_pclmul 2955 0
    crc32c_intel 14217 0
    ghash_clmulni_intel 4362 0
    xhci_hcd 149286 0
    aesni_intel 144871 6
    aes_x86_64 7463 1 aesni_intel
    lrw 3821 1 aesni_intel
    gf128mul 6018 1 lrw
    glue_helper 4737 1 aesni_intel
    ahci 24299 2
    ablk_helper 2100 1 aesni_intel
    cryptd 8537 4 ghash_clmulni_intel,aesni_intel,ablk_helper
    libahci 21772 1 ahci
    libata 174153 2 ahci,libahci
    ehci_pci 4152 0
    ehci_hcd 64619 1 ehci_pci
    scsi_mod 138333 4 rts5139,libata,sd_mod,sr_mod
    usbcore 188509 5 uvcvideo,rts5139,ehci_hcd,ehci_pci,xhci_hcd
    usb_common 1712 1 usbcore
    i8042 13666 2 libps2,ideapad_laptop
    serio 11018 9 serio_raw,atkbd,i8042,psmouse
    i915 797177 2
    video 12057 1 i915
    button 4765 1 i915
    intel_gtt 12856 1 i915
    i2c_algo_bit 5480 1 i915
    drm_kms_helper 39643 1 i915
    drm 244846 4 i915,drm_kms_helper
    i2c_core 41648 6 drm,i915,i2c_i801,drm_kms_helper,i2c_algo_bit,videodev
    journalctl of a previous attempt
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: input: Lid Switch as /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0C0D:00/input/input0
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: ACPI: Lid Switch [LID0]
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: input: Sleep Button as /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0C0E:00/input/input1
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: ACPI: Sleep Button [SLPB]
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: input: Power Button as /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0C0C:00/input/input2
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: ACPI: Power Button [PWRB]
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: input: Power Button as /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXPWRBN:00/input/input3
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: ACPI: Power Button [PWRF]
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: [drm] Memory usable by graphics device = 2048M
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: checking generic (e0000000 410000) vs hw (e0000000 10000000)
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: fb: switching to inteldrmfb from VESA VGA
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: Console: switching to colour dummy device 80x25
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: i915 0000:00:02.0: irq 40 for MSI/MSI-X
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: [drm] Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 2 (21.10.2013).
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: [drm] Driver supports precise vblank timestamp query.
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: vgaarb: device changed decodes: PCI:0000:00:02.0,olddecodes=io+mem,decodes=io+mem:owns=io+mem
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: fbcon: inteldrmfb (fb0) is primary device
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: [drm:cpt_serr_int_handler] *ERROR* PCH transcoder A FIFO underrun
    I've tested all the kernels > 3.15.8  but they seem to create the error above. My questions are
    Was there a change in the linux kernel options from 3.15.8?
    Am I using / missing a module that I shouldn't / should be using for my cpu?
    Last edited by acothi (2014-10-06 02:49:39)

    Hi acothi,
    I was getting the same error message for months. Linux kernel 3.16.3-1 finally fixed it for me. My system: Intel Ivy-Bridge i5-3570K CPU + Intel DH77DF Mobo with latest BIOS (dated 2013). Please update to latest kernel in [Core] and report back. However, I don't think that your SD card slot issues are directly related to this error message. I also recommend installing linux-lts kernel and adding a bootloader entry, so you can still be productive, even if the latest Linux kernel doesn't fix it for you.
    Afaik, this error has nothing to do with kernel options, but was introduced by a usual kernel commit (and seems to be fixed upstream).
    Cheers,
    Tolga
    Last edited by tolga9009 (2014-10-06 16:47:02)

  • I downlaoded the new version of firefox for my linux os on an Eee pc900 however i am unable to install the update why

    I need to update my firefox web browser, however when the update has down loaded to my notebook it refuses to open and install
    The bios is asus 900ocpi ver 1009 and it is using ECFirmware

    The version of Xandros Linux ''(from early 2007)'' that Asus was using on the EeePC doesn't have the GTK package needed to run Firefox 3+ versions, you need to update it. When I did that update on my EeePC 900 20GB two years ago it didn't work too well, was slower than hell. I ended up installing a newer version of Linux named EasyPeasy, which is a off-shoot of Ubuntu. - http://www.geteasypeasy.com/ - Now my EeePC runs better than it did when it was new back in 2008.
    Here's a couple of support threads about updating EeePC / Xandros for installing Firefox 3 on the EeePC, you'll have to modify those instructions for Firefox 4 or look for more up to date instructions.
    http://wiki.eeeuser.com/howto:installfirefox3?s=firefox
    http://forum.eeeuser.com/viewtopic.php?id=41815

  • New version of the LabHSM Toolkit for Complex Event-Driven Development is Now Available!

    A new version of the unique toolkit is now available for download. As announced earlier, LabHSM makes it possible to easily create and then maintain complex event-driven applications in LabVIEW as a collection of HSM-driven active object VIs using a higher level of abstraction and agile software development methodologies. These active object VIs are created based on a universal Hierarchical State Machine ( HSM or statechart ) template. Therefore, all your code looks similar regardless of its functionality!
    So, what’s new in version 1.1?
    • "No hands" block diagram modifications! Version 1.1 actually creates, renames, and removes actions on the block diagram as you define, rename, and remove them in the editor! (No, it can't fill in all the details for you, but it can do some, if you think ahead, by replicating similar actions.)
    • Two new screens, Events Usage and Actions Usage, (available in licensed copies only) clearly show where (in which state(s)/transition(s)) and how (is it an entry action, exit action or event handling action?) a particular event or action is used. Moreover, if after selecting an instance on the list, the Go To button is pressed, it makes the main screen jump to respective location in the HSM structure. In the case of Actions Usage screen, the respective action is also displayed on the block diagram. Thus, these screens provide two more different cross-sections of the HSM data set and two additional ways to navigate it – now along the Actions and Events dimensions too instead of just the state tree in the first version.
    • Version 1.1 can duplicate events or actions, which helps when you've got several that are similar. Changes in the events and actions lists are reflected immediately on the main screen and on the block diagram (which solves the previous problem of deleting a renamed event or action when it's still in use).
    • The Events and Actions List Editors are no longer modal and neither are the Events and Actions Usage screens, so you can have all the panels and the block diagram visible and move freely among them as you build your HSM (a good argument for an even larger monitor).
    • When you save an HSM file, version 1.1 automatically adds the .hsm extension if you leave it out and it remembers the last directory you used.
    • The Loaded VIs utility now can open and close block diagrams (if they are not protected with a password) and display only VIs with modal front panels, if desired—useful for quickly finding and closing accidentally opened (e.g., from the hierarchy window) modal VIs. Make a modal version of this utility and keep it on the Desktop for this purpose.
    • A new example of a simple hierarchical state machine and two more excellent tutorials from Paul F. Sullivan (SULLutions.com) are included into the package. The tutorials are also available online. The overview article has also been extended.
    As before, the LabHSM toolkit is available for UNLIMITED PERIOD trial. Please visit http://www.labhsm.com for details and download. The site also contains references which you may want to check to learn more about hierarchical state machines and active object computing.
    Stanislav Rumega
    NI Certified LabVIEW Developer
    H View Labs
    http://www.labhsm.com
    [email protected]
    US Toll-Free Phone/Fax: 877-570-8684

    I am not really sure if Azure support this but its worth to make your configuration file to support .NET 4.0
    $PShome\PowerShell_ISE.CONFIG and $PSHOME\PowerShell.exe.config will be not existing.
    So you can make an entry in configuration to support .NET framework 4.0
    like shown below
    $config_text = @"
    <?xml version="1.0"?>
    <configuration>
    <startup useLegacyV2RuntimeActivationPolicy="true">
    <supportedRuntime version="v4.0.30319"/>
    <supportedRuntime version="v2.0.50727"/>
    </startup>
    </configuration>
    $config_text| Out-File $pshome\powershell.exe.config
    $config_text| Out-File $pshome\powershell_ise.exe.config
    Close PowerShell Console and open as administrator.
    Try loading the modules back and let me know.
    Regards Chen V [MCTS SharePoint 2010]

  • New Version of the Azure Active Directory Module and PowerShell 2.0

    Since the last upgrade of the Azure Active Directory Module for Windows PowerShell (64-bit version), we are no longer able to load it in an application targeting .NET Framework 3.5 SP1. The error message that we receive is:
    Could not load file or assembly 'file:///C:\Windows\system32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\Modules\MSOnline\Microsoft.Online.Administration.Automation.PSModule.dll' or one of its dependencies. This assembly is built by a runtime newer
    than the currently loaded runtime and cannot be loaded.
    Our application loads and uses the Azure AD PowerShell Module for Azure AD management. The previous version of the module available until September worked well, however, we cannot use the new version because it is built using the .NET Framework 4.0 runtime,
    and our application targets .NET Framework 3.5 SP1.
    The link for the old version of the module was removed, and since the EULA for the module restricts us from making the old version available on our web site, we need a solution that would enable us
    to load the module in our application because we cannot retarget the application to a newer Framework version. In particular,
    we need a link that our customers can use to download the old version of the module.
    Is there a URL to the old version of the Azure Active Directory Module that we can download the old version from? Can someone help?

    Hi Vladimir,
    Since I'm not familiar with AZure AD, to get the old version of Azure AD Module, I also recommend you can post in Azure AD forum for more effective support:
    http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/forums/azure/en-US/home?forum=WindowsAzureAD
    However, for the error you posted, as you said, this is related to .NET version.
    I found a similar error, which was solved by upgrading the Powershell version 3.0 on Server 2008 R2 sp1, which also need to update the .NET version on server.
    Active Directory Single sign-on Office 365 Powershell Error
    If there is anything else regarding the powershell, please feel free to post back.
    Best Regards,
    Anna Wang
    Anna, yep upgrading to version 3.0 simple solve the issue. But WMF 3.0 is not compatible with few things like
    SharePoint 2010, Exchange 2007 , SCCM etc.
    WMF 3.0 has the same .NET version so how about making a configuration file in version 2.0
    I am not really sure if Azure support this but its worth to make your configuration file to support .NET 4.0
    $PShome\PowerShell_ISE.CONFIG and $PSHOME\PowerShell.exe.config will be not existing.
    So you can make an entry in configuration to support .NET framework 4.0
    like shown below
    $config_text = @"
    <?xml version="1.0"?>
    <configuration>
    <startup useLegacyV2RuntimeActivationPolicy="true">
    <supportedRuntime version="v4.0.30319"/>
    <supportedRuntime version="v2.0.50727"/>
    </startup>
    </configuration>
    $config_text| Out-File $pshome\powershell.exe.config
    $config_text| Out-File $pshome\powershell_ise.exe.config
    Close PowerShell Console and open as administrator.
    Try loading the modules back and let me know.
    Regards Chen V [MCTS SharePoint 2010]

  • The new version on itunes stink!

    i just downloaded the new version of itunes, and suddenly, more than 3/4 of my music have disappeared, and my playlists are gone! please tell me what to do!. those were years and years worth of music and playlists!

    Look at www.apple.com/iTunes and see for yourself.

  • WHY do you offer new versions of Firefox without warning that bookmarks will be lost and the last backup was 10 weeks ago???????????

    Just upgraded to 3.6.3 and found that all bookmarks since April 16 (it is now June 25) are missing. I have read instructions for restoring bookmark backups but if possible would like to restore bookmarks between 4/16 and now. Restoring instructions say that I will lose those if I follow the instructions. Why was there no warning of this when the 3.6.3 upgrade was offered???? How can I get back 10 weeks' worth of bookmarks?

    I have found an incompatibility in the older revision JSON files that your bookmarks are stored in to the newer client. It could be that the new client simply can't see them as a result of this incompatibility.
    Please check the following directory for JSON files dated older than the update in May just in case: C:\Users\[YourUsername]\AppData\Roaming\Mozilla\Firefox\Profiles\[generated stuff].default\bookmarkbackups
    If you're unable to see the AppData Folder, please enable Hidden files and folder by clicking on the Organise button from any folder (located top left of window), and then the following:
    Folder & search options > View Tab > Show Hidden Files, Folders and Drives.
    If JSON files are located there, which are dated older than the update and you wish to restore them, please make a copy of this folder on your desktop, and uninstall the current revision of firefox (Temporarily). Reinstall an older revision, import the JSON file of your choosing, then export them as an HTML file, before finally upgrading back to the latest revision of Firefox. Once the latest revision of Firefox is installed again, import the HTML file, and this should restore your bookmarks.
    If an older JSON file is not available, see if there's a shadowcopy of the file by going to Computer, right click your drive, Restore previous versions, click on the date of your shadowcopy and click on open, then navigate to the same location mentioned and copy it onto your current desktop.
    If no shadowcopies are available, you could be out of luck. You could try a system restore point dating to before the update, which should roll back Firefox to the older revision, and may restore your bookmarks too, but at this point hope is sparse.
    I've experienced the same frustration myself just recently. I was able to fix the issue, and I hope the same applies in your situation o_o"

  • The new version of Firefox does not seem to allow multi-touchscreen pinch/zoom feature. Is this a bug or is there something I can do to fix the problem? Thanks.

    Since the new version of Firefox (which I love, esp the reduced menu bars at the top, leaving more web page viewable space), I am unable to use the multi-touch pinch/zoom function to resize pages. the scrolling still works, and all worked fine before.
    Is this a bug or is there something I can do to fix it?
    Thanks for your time.
    Mx

    Not a fix but if it's just a web site here and there that you find yourself using the pinch zoom feature you can use the IE Tab 2 addon to automatically use the ie engine and the zoom works.
    You lose the other firefox features on those pages but as I said, if it's just a few sites it's worth a look.
    I sure hope the Mozilla community fixes this in their desktop PC version soon. You can't gripe if it's free so I just keep waiting. :)
    Their android and iOS version supports it so why not the PC version?

Maybe you are looking for