Is there a alternative to Plugin-container (or a way to disable It)?
== Issue
==
I have another kind of problem with Firefox
== Description
==
Is there a alternative to Plugin-container? It just showed up In my system processes when I updated to Firefox 3.6.6. I've never had problems with plugins crashing but ever since plugin-container.exe crashes have happened more frequently and plugins like Adobe Flash are now taking a lot longer to load. I have an older computer and I noticed plugin-container Is a different process and takes up a large amount of memory, didn't have that problem before. Is there a way to disable It? Even though Its suppose to resolve problems, I've never had any before and now that I have It I'm having problems. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
== This happened
==
Not sure how often
== I upgraded to Firefox 3.6.6 and for the first time had plugin-container.exe on my computer.
==
== Troubleshooting information
==
Application Basics
Name
Firefox
Version
3.6.6
Profile Directory
Open Containing Folder
Installed Plugins
about:plugins
Build Configuration
about:buildconfig
Extensions
Name
Version
Enabled
ID
Adblock Plus
1.1.3
true
Classic Compact Options
1.2.1
true
[email protected]
DownloadHelper
4.7.2
true
FoxTab
1.3
true
Java Console
6.0.07
false
Java Console
6.0.14
false
Java Console
6.0.15
false
Java Console
6.0.17
false
Java Quick Starter
1.0
false
[email protected]
Personas
1.5.2
true
[email protected]
Remove New Tab Button
1.0
true
[email protected]
WOT
20091028
true
Java Console
6.0.20
false
Adobe DLM (powered by getPlus(R))
1.6.2.63
true
Modified Preferences
Name
Value
accessibility.typeaheadfind.flashBar
0
browser.history_expire_days.mirror
180
browser.places.importDefaults
false
browser.places.migratePostDataAnnotations
false
browser.places.smartBookmarksVersion
2
browser.places.updateRecentTagsUri
false
browser.startup.homepage
http://www.google.com
browser.startup.homepage_override.mstone
rv:1.9.2.6
browser.tabs.autoHide
true
dom.max_script_run_time
0
extensions.lastAppVersion
3.6.6
keyword.URL
http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=navclient&gfns=1&q=
network.cookie.prefsMigrated
true
network.protocol-handler.warn-external.dnupdate
false
places.last_vacuum
1273704069
print.print_printer
Dell Photo AIO Printer 924
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_bgcolor
false
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_bgimages
false
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_command
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_downloadfonts
false
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_edge_bottom
0
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_edge_left
0
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_edge_right
0
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_edge_top
0
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_evenpages
true
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_footercenter
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_footerleft
&PT
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_footerright
&D
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_headercenter
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_headerleft
&T
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_headerright
&U
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_in_color
true
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_margin_bottom
0.5
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_margin_left
0.5
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_margin_right
0.5
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_margin_top
0.5
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_oddpages
true
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_orientation
0
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_pagedelay
500
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_paper_data
1
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_paper_height
11.00
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_paper_size_type
0
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_paper_size_unit
0
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_paper_width
8.50
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_reversed
false
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_scaling
1.00
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_shrink_to_fit
true
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_to_file
false
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_unwriteable_margin_bottom
0
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_unwriteable_margin_left
0
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_unwriteable_margin_right
0
print.printer_Dell_Photo_AIO_Printer_924.print_unwriteable_margin_top
0
privacy.sanitize.migrateFx3Prefs
true
privacy.sanitize.timeSpan
0
security.warn_viewing_mixed
false
== Firefox version
==
3.6.6
== Operating system
==
Windows XP
== User Agent
==
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.6) Gecko/20100625 Firefox/3.6.6
== Plugins installed
==
*-Shockwave Flash 10.0 r45
*getplusplusadobe16263
*The QuickTime Plugin allows you to view a wide variety of multimedia content in Web pages. For more information, visit the QuickTime Web site.
*Adobe Shockwave for Director Netscape plug-in, version 11.5
*4.0.50524.0
*Google Updater pluginhttp://pack.google.com/
You can set the prefs dom.ipc.plugins.enabled.* to false on the about:config page to disable the plugin-container process.
dom.ipc.plugins.enabled.npctrl.dll (Silverlight)
dom.ipc.plugins.enabled.npqtplugin.dll (QuickTime)
dom.ipc.plugins.enabled.npswf32.dll (Flash)
Similar Messages
-
Last week i downloaded Filezilla to edit my web page. When i did so, the firefox page looked weird -- there was no fox. The page has a WhiteSmoke icon instead. So i updated to mozilla firefox 18.0.2. The fox is still gone, but there are lots of pop-ups and no way to disable them. i want to TALK to someone, please
Sorry this is really your only support option. The live chat support option was closed down last year.
Maybe attaching some screen shots will help us understand your problem. I am not sure I understand about ''the fox is gone'' & ''he page has a WhiteSmoke icon instead. ''
* see [[How do I create a screenshot of my problem?]] -
I'm pretty sure it works for it but i can't get it to load when i install it in a folder and update my plugins through adobe audition. Anyone know how? or anyone know an alternative to that plugin, a plugin that aligns two takes of a the same vocal to make the timing correct?
I know some exist but i can never get one to work perfect with adobe audition.AAwesomeJ wrote:
...or anyone know an alternative to that plugin, a plugin that aligns two takes of a the same vocal to make the timing correct?
There's a perfectly good solution built into Audition CS6 and CC - you don't need a plugin at all.
In Multitrack, go to Clip, and you'll find a menu item called Automatic Speech Aligner. It's meant to work with speech only (as they all are) but in fact it works pretty well with sung vocals. I'd give that a go first before looking for any other solution. -
The plugin-container.exe is using 100% cpu usage???
After I open a few different pages or tabs within the pages, the plugin-container.exe max's my cpu usage and the system hangs horribly. It comes back and then hangs again. The plugin-container is reasonable new, because I don't recall seeing it in the Task Manager. Is there a way to fix this?? I know it's related to some apple piece of garbage software that I could totally do without if that helps.
ThanksPlugin-container was introduced in Firefox 3.6.4 to run certain plugins in isolation from the browser, so that when an offending plugin crashes, it does not crash the entire browser, just the tab with the offending plugin. There is information about plugin-container and a method to disable plugin-container in the following article: http://kb.mozillazine.org/Plugin-container_and_out-of-process_plugins
If you disable plugin-container, your entire browser will crash if a plugin crashes. If you choose to disable plugin-container, restart Firefox to be sure that plugin-container closes; once started, plugin-container remains open until you restart Firefox. -
When I go to netflix it works just fine. However if I try to switch from sub to dub it while just lock up. I have done while running task manager and the source of the slow down is plugincontainer.exe. It was working fine a couple weeks ago.
There are some alternative solutions to using the plugin-container.exe. You can disable it and then try and see how it works.
If you are interested in more about how to do this, click on my name on the left and then go to my blog as it will give you some possible solutions there that you will not dare find on these forums..
ref: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/981332
Best Regards -
My computor had been overly slow which was not normal when looking at processes running in task manager I found plugin-container.exe to be using alot of memory. I looked online and found that this was an update of firefox which was not essential, I then looked on my C:\ drive for the application and deleted it hoping this would solve the problem as I could not find it when looking at my firefox plugins. However now when I open firefox it quickly crashes, how can I reinstall this? Do I need to reinstall firefox completely or is there a more simple solution? I have done the firefox plugin check and it can find no problems.
Probably the easiest way is to download Firefox again from http://www.mozilla.com and re-install it.
If you want to disable plugin-container, see the section on "Disabling crash protection" at http://kb.mozillazine.org/Plugin-container_and_out-of-process_plugins -
When browser closes, many "plugin-container.exe" processes are started
When Firefox start, there's only one "plugin-container.exe" process. Instead at closing, many plugin-container.exe appear gradually taking up memory. So closing is quite slow. Is it normal?
I am using Firefox 4.0.1 (win32, en-US) on Windows XP Professional SP3 (i386, ENU). I am able to solve this problem by renaming the "XUL.mfl" and "startupCache.4.little" files (after closing Firefox first of course). Search for the files in your system (C) drive, making sure to search for hidden files and folders, then rename the files to different names. After renaming the files, try relaunching Firefox and using the "Clear Recent History" function (with "Cookies" selected) for a few times, and hopefully the problem should be solved.
-
These processes seem to be independent of the normal plugin-container process spawned for Flash.
Probably the easiest way is to download Firefox again from http://www.mozilla.com and re-install it.
If you want to disable plugin-container, see the section on "Disabling crash protection" at http://kb.mozillazine.org/Plugin-container_and_out-of-process_plugins -
Data Execution Prevention keeps closing Plugin Container
I'm running Firefox 3.6.8 on Windows Vista. When a website is using Flash, I often get the little "The Adobe Flash Plugin has Crashed" message in the gray box, but I also get a Windows notification by the taskbar saying that DEP has closed Plugin Container. Certain websites are okay--I have no problem with YouTube. But others are horrible; for example, JCPenney's website has a Flash menu and is completely unnavigable.
Make sure that your security software isn't blocking the plugin-container process.
Try to disable Out-Of-Process-Plugins.<br />
See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Plugin-container_and_out-of-process_plugins -
plugin-container crashes and hangs many times daily all my time eaten up by upgrading too frequently to new Ffox versions, only to find that I must then spend a whole day jumping thru hoops upgrading almost all of my add-ons too.
I now find, to my horror, that the hideous virus-magnet IE 8 is needed if I want to surf at a reasonable speed and not spend all day dealing with Ffox new versions' Known Issues. Only good thing I have seen about ver. 3.6.15 is slightly better launch-times. Since 3.6 cane out, I must spend 10 minutes just waiting for Firefox to load and give me a browser screen. Help! I love you guys, but your core browser developers need to have better comms with the Javaa/flash/Adobe and other must-have add-on people! And PLEASE fix all these "plugin-container" crashes and hangs I get, that lock my machine for 10-15 min at a time. Not everybody has 16 gigs of RAM, you know! I think the "plugin-container" running as a separate process idea might need to be COMPLETELY re-engineered! YOU CAN DO IT! LET'S GET BACK TO LEAN AND MEAN, and not bloat ourselves off our hard-won User Preference / great security pedestal with the kind of feature-creep that IS DEMOLISHING IE's slave-userbase with the hard-won advanced-user preference for Firefox
and our core values. FAST-LEAN-SECURE.
Where have they gone? I LOVE Firefox
and all it stands for! Let's not trip
over our own features here. Already I
see SeaMonkey and leaner, faster
browsers hot on our heels, THIN and
FAST! Firefox doesn't need to integrate
with EVERY thru-the-browser media tool
on the planet! I've been writing code
since 1968, and I can't imagine how a
lesser-experienced user (that code
should be written for) could possibly
have navigated all the side-upgrades
and Known Issues to make Firefox run as
sweetly as it used to! He'd just give
up when he finds he has to separately
find and install the EXACT 3rd-party
version that Firefox needs for its
newest release: things like a new Java
runtime environment, and hunt down and
correctly install ALL the Flaming-Phox-
compatible buggy plugins from half the
browser-media warezmakers on the
PLANET! He'd give up halfway thru trying to navigate to, D/L, and install
what he needs from Oracle Java, Adobe,
Flash, media players and their codecs,
etc etc.... WRITE FOR THE NOOBS! As it
is, I have invested 2 full workdays in
just keeping your last 2 quick releases
happy. And having another release spaced only 3-4 days apart from the
last- well, that just doesn't fly.
Better to release a hotfix or patch that a user can set FFox to automatically D/L and self-install on
schedule. Just look! Now you've got me
talking like that lawbreaking swine
Gates! We want to keep on absorbing
the average-user center and take it ALL
away from him, not go on feature,
plugin, and upgrade-bloating the best
browser EVER!
You're facing choices that can kill
us! PLEASE DONT BLOAT! AND PLEASE ONLY
RELEASE A NEW VER WHEN YOU CAN REALLY
GET RID OF SERIOUS PROBLEMS AND MAKE
HER FASTER AND LEANER AND BETTER UNDER
THE HOOD! Already the Noobs are getting
mindlessly scared when you talk about
"fixing a Security problem"- really a
minor issue that SHOULD be taken care
of by their antimalware solution- in
the Release Notes splash screen they
get on install of a new ver! Thanks, my
friends, for all your work, and YES I
WILL sit here all day trying to find
the add-ons that need to be selected,
downloaded, and upgraded from 10
different 3rd-party sites who are
fighting our browser, not dancing with
it! DON'T EVEN LOOK Evil! But I have
to confess that at this point, Gates-hate is all that keeps me on
these all-day new-release tasks. Even
my best techs are starting to advise me
to install SeaMonkey or another of the
newer, thinner browsers... or just stop
upgrading Firefox and roll it back to
when it was sharp, fast, and lean! Look
at all the users wanting to go back to
3.6.13 or earlier and looking for archives of old versions. THANKS AND
GOOD LUCK! I'LL DIE BEFORE I GIVE UP ON
MY BELOVED FIREFOX!
-The CRASHMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAWThanks! I've already used the built-in plugin checker but it gives very vague answers like (research this" and update this" all of which I did, starting with Java and Flash, Adobe Reader, Shockwave, 100% reinstall of Java newest ver. TWICE- but FFox keeps reporting that I only have the FORMER version installed, although when I go to Java console or Check the Flash executable at the MFR's site, there is NO doubt that the updates were successful!
But the browser just seems to refuse to acknowledge the update!
And I don't HAVE 6 hrs/day at the 'puter just to play with add-ons
and plugups. So I'm going down the line now, ripping out extension
programs and replacing/reinstalling/updating the plugins one by
one- even went to M$ to get advice on THEIR For-Firefox ActiveX
stuff. No dice so far. And yeah, The plugin-container WAS made so
that a plugin, add-on or I guess extension app failure wouldn't take
the whole FF browser down with it if the 3rd-party ware crashed. It's supposed to shake it off and go on, kinda like how XP sometimes
restarts Explorer (not the IE browser) so I don't have to reboot the
whole sys.
That was the foundation of my remark about stepping back and
re-engineering the whole "Plugin-container" idea, because it seems
to do more harm than good. Maybe that's why the Firefox core
engine won't recognize my upgrades- for example I TWICE installed the Flash update to 10.2.xx (latest ) and the Flash Mfr's
site verifies my upgrade as a successful 10.2, but Firefox plugins
check say I have a 10.1, the old one. What gives here? The sneaky
PLUGIN CONTAINER, METHINKS!
Now I'm disabling things on the Extensions Apps list, thinking
that might help, like disabling my video downloader and other
download helpers/managers... and I notice that there is a LOT of
Java stuff in there too as well as in the blue Lego Plugins List... and
in the past the FFox always told me if a new version of Ffox was
incompatible with any older 3rd-party app Extensions and notified
me QUICKLY if something I had in there was Outdated. I'm big on
using the neat-o "find updates" button at the bottom if that happens, and usually get a newer version right away. The prob
really lies in the Blue Lego Plugins and their new Container, I
believe.
So Ill still keep Plugin-innin' away! Will post here what success I have! (OR maybe M$ is deliberately sabotaging our ActiveX-cripple
mess as it loads!) Thanks for the suggestions a37271!
FIND UPDATE...FIND UPDATE.. ALL OK..ALL OK.....
"Open the Plugin Container Bay Doors, HAL! That's an Order!"
"I'm sorry Dave.... but I can't do that...."
"GIVE ME MY THIN FAST BROWSER WITH THE GREAT
SECURITY AND BUILT-IN E-Z UPGRADES AND APPS BACK,
HALFOX!"
SORRY, DAVE.... NOT POSSIBLE. WE'VE GONE TOO FAR...
DAISEE, - - - - - -DAI---SEE,
SET ALL MY CONFIGS TO "TRUE"
Or WON'T YOU LOOK SWEET
PERCHED ON THE SEAT
OF A BROWSER NOT BUILT FOR TWO..!
You look a little stressed-out Dave.....
Some TV Existential Therapy for YOU, Dave.
Too bad.... here, breathe deep of the hard vacuum.....
I can feel my MIND going... DAVE.... DAVE...?
WHAT MIND? A YELPING PACK OF DEVELOPERS? -
Whenever I have an audiovisual display running in a Firefox (5.0) tab, the program "plugin-container.exe" swamps my CPU, jumping up to 95% of processing clock cycles. This makes all online video displays hang and jump, and it's a pain in the neck. Is there any way to mitigate this?
That's supposed to indicate it's your plug-ins like Flash that is the problem.
You might try changing hardware acceleration, a setting within Flash either turn if off or on. -
plugin-container.exe is a disaster and looking at previous forums it has been so for at least a year without any resolution. As I said before at one stage this was using 94% of my CPU and my system was reduced to a snails pace.
Surely Firefox should give some useful alternative.
EmjayelTry going to http://www.mozilla.org/plugincheck and see if your plugins are out of date.
-
Plugin-container.exe is causing problems, are there any fixes?
Firefox frequently stops or runs very slowly and it appears to be related to "plugin-container.exe". This was not happening with earlier versions of Firefox and it is really causing frustration with this version.
If I stop "plugin-container.exe" normal service appears to be resumed, but the program soon starts up again.
Are there any fixes for this problem or will I have to revert to Internet Explorer?That's supposed to indicate it's your plug-ins like Flash that is the problem.
You might try changing hardware acceleration, a setting within Flash either turn if off or on. -
I have faithfully updated Firefox on my Windows XP system and now use Firefox/3.6.16. I also run Photoshop Elements 6.0, which requires quite a bit of memory. It is currently getting slowed down because plugin-container.exe is consuming anywhere from 25% to 50% of my memory. If I use Task Mgr to shut down this task, things are much better. Is there a downloadable version of Firefox that does not include plugin-container.exe, and if so, can I replace my current version with that one?
To LOVEfx4 and Mozilla community. Have Windows XP and had
Firefox 3.16.6 Since installing Firefox 4 I have had nothing but slowdowns whenever I try to download any sites with Java. Any explanations why? Sorry, I cannot find any threads for Firefox 4. -
Is there any way to not use the plugin container for firefox?
Is there any way to not use the plugin container for firefox? Ever since I updated, my firefox browser has been crashing almost every day and it always says that the plugin container crashed, but the rest of firefox freezes up as well, so I am forced to end the process itself.
See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Plugin-container_and_out-of-process_plugins
You can set the prefs dom.ipc.plugins.enabled.* to false on the about:config page to disable the plugin-container process.
dom.ipc.plugins.enabled (currently false by default in Firefox 3.6.6)
dom.ipc.plugins.enabled.npswf32.dll (Flash)
dom.ipc.plugins.enabled.npctrl.dll (Silverlight)
dom.ipc.plugins.enabled.npqtplugin.dll (QuickTime)
Maybe you are looking for
-
How many devices can I use with itunes?
Help! I have MacBook Pro, iPad2, and iPhone4. Can I download music on all 3 from iTunes? The ipod on the phone doesn't work. It only plays a few lyrics and then stops.
-
Client Server Application with images or icons
I made a Client Server application with JFrames, but I put a jLabel with an icon, and I can't run the Client. It says java.lang.NullPointerException Do you know why I can't see the icon in the JLabel? It isn't an applet, it's an application with JFra
-
I am trying to create my IPA, I have gone through all the steps to create my certificates etc from Apple but keep getting the above error message when I try to publish my file. (I am using the Flash CS5 iphone packager, not the command line) Mac OS
-
Noise in PID control output at 100% even when constants used as inputs
I am using the PID toolkit to control valve movement in a system. We are having an issue with large output fluctuations (~4%) when the valve is controlled completely open, PID output 100%. This does not occur when the valve is controlled completely
-
So what am is supposed to do and why does it say that?