Is there a Cornerfix solution built into Lightroom?

For those of you that use Cornerfix to reverse/eliminate corner vignetting and color shift in Leica M8/M9, and other mirrorless cameras using short register rangefinder lenses, is there a way to do this within Lightroom, using a Lightroom feature or a plug-in?

MadManChan2000 wrote:
Not yet.
I wonder if I interpret it right, if I read this as "it's being planned" or "under construction"?
Desperately needing something more streamlined that Cornerfix. Right now my solution is an export preset which outputs as DNG, stacks it with the original raw, then launches my quick&dirty assistant program which first runs Cornerfix where I need to do the dirty work by hand and after I quit it the file names get fixed by the assistant program - after that the metadata need to be restored in LR. Hardly fun

Similar Messages

  • Are there any ADA features for the visually impared built into SL?

    Hi,
    I am just about to buy a mac Mini for my Mother-in-law who suffer from macular degeneration. I was hoping that there might be some features built into Snow Leopard that were designed to assist the visually impared?

    It's difficult to generalise for any individual user, as almost every partially sighed person has different preferences.
    As V.K. pointed out, there are several features built into the Universal Access pane of System Preferences.
    However, you can begin with the Desktop & Screen Saver pane in System Preferences. You can choose from a wide variety of backgrounds to give the appropriate glare reduction and/or contrast enhancement that might be necessary. Try first the Desktop Pictures folder itself, and the Nature folder (Ladybug and Tranquil Surface can be restful for stressed eyes). Wave, in the Black & White collection, can also be helpful, as can Pinstripe in the Patterns folder. Finally, it's worth exploring the Solid Colours, as icons and such show up most clearly against these.
    You can also change the background colours of Finder windows (unfortunately only in Icon view), by using the View—>Show View Options menu command (shortcut Command-J), selecting the "Color" radio button and clicking on the white square. This opens the Colour Picker which enables the user to fine-tune the background to suit his or her vision. It can be very helpful to set the backgrounds of different folders to strongly contrasting colours, as they can be easily identified and selected without zooming in to see what they are. For example, if the Applications window is set to blue, the Utilities to a light brown, the Home folder to red, and the Documents folder to yellow, they are very easy to distinguish on the Desktop.
    You can change the size of icons and the text identifying them, also in the Finder's View Options pane, and the Highlight colour (in the Appearance pane of System Preferences).
    Moving on, in the Universal Access pane, of course there is VoiceOver itself, which enables even totally blind people to operate the Mac more or less comprehensively. However, learning this may be somewhat daunting to a person who is losing her sight, particularly someone new to the Mac. As A Brody indicated, this also provides Braille output, though again there might be a learning curve if the lady does not already know Braille. VoiceOver can be set to use Grade 1 (uncontracted) Braille, which is much easier than the contracted (Grade 2) forms.
    Also in Universal Access, as Dire Wolf pointed out, there are several zoom options. The simplest is to hold down the Ctrl key and scroll with mouse or trackpad. There are also fixed zoom positions that may be more suitable, as they can be reached with a single keystroke. The zoom range is up to 20 times magnification. The zoom can be configured to follow the keyboard focus (though this works best in Apple applications, and some third-party apps do not work in this way), or to keep the cursor in the middle of the screen, or to move the image when the pointer reaches an edge of the screen.
    The colours of the screen can be inverted, giving white on black instead of black on white, as referred to by Steven. Other colours may give a somewhat strange appearance—but it is worth experimenting with desktop and window backgrounds to give the most satisfactory solution. Alternatively, the whole display can be switched to greyscale, and the contrast tweaked to give maximum readability.
    Finally, the third-party application VisioVoice provides a wide range of specialist contrast-enhancement and readability tools, as well as the ability to speak text or convert it to sound files for use in iTunes or on MP3 players and iPods. I know one person who uses the Text Enlarger window to show white text on a dark blue background, as this suits her eye condition best. Others prefer yellow text against muddy brown…
    Hope this helps!
    Archie

  • Is there Wireless Capability built into the eMac?

    Can someone tell me if there is Wireless Capability built into the eMac? I would like to use it wireless from my Linksys router. If it is built in, where would I look to set it up? Thank you.

    You have the eMac from 2002, right? You will need a "classic" AirPort card that looks like THIS:
    http://afterthemac.com/wireless/airport_card.jpg
    The eMacs made between 2003-2006 use the faster AirPort Extreme card. I had an eMac that recently bit the dust, but I salvaged the AirPort Extreme card that I got with it (ordered a 1.42 GHz eMac to replace it, so this AirPort Extreme card should come in handy).

  • Is there a way to disable the HSTS ( HTTP Strict Transport Security ) list built into Firefox or to allow exceptions?

    HSTS is problematic in that it incorrectly assumes that all users trust the default list of CAs and makes the adding of exceptions impossible even by advanced users.
    For example, torproject.org is inaccessible on Firefox unless I am willing to trust DigiCert to never sign a fake certificate either by negligence or by court order of any country in witch they operate, thereby making every https: site ( not just torproject.org ) vulnerable to a MITM attack.
    A user disabling CAs in the browser is not unreasonable given the ever growing list of CAs built into Firefox ( each one a potential point of failure ), the number of CAs that have been recently compromised and the very low standards required to obtain a certificate.
    While I understand the desire to protect the average user who doesn't understand how certificates work and will click past warnings without reading them, this protection should not come at the expense of more security conscious users.
    I would recommend an about:config setting that would allow the creation of exceptions by users who explicitly choose to do so.
    So far the only kludge I have been able to come up with is to modify c:\program files\mozilla firefox\xul.dll with a hex editor and replace the sites on the list ( this is far from an ideal solution ).

    dumdidadida: Thanks for your reply, but it doesn't address the problem. HSTS is designed to FORCE the use of https, this is a good thing in most cases. However, HSTS is problematic in that it incorrectly assumes that all users trust the default list of CAs and makes the adding of exceptions impossible even by advanced users.
    torprojec.org is just an example, this effects every HSTS site. You can reproduce this problem yourself in version 17 or later if you temporary disable "DigiCert High Assurance EV Root CA" in your certificate store and then visit torproject.org. You will notice the ability to add exceptions has been removed and that the cert_override.txt file found in the user's profile is also ignored.

  • Is there a way to migrate my iPhoto content into Lightroom 5?

    I have been using iPhoto as my photo organising app since I first got my Mac, and I'm reasonably happy with the way it works. I have all my photos organised into 'Events', and it is all very satisfactory.
    However I am aware that iPhoto is on it's way out with the upcoming release of Yosemite in the autumn, and so I wondered about changing over to the 3rd Party, (but highly recommended), Adobe Lightroom app.
    I've paid my money for the Adobe 'Creative Cloud' subscription package, which includes full versions of both Lightroom 5 and Photoshop, but I've hit a snag when I come to migrate my photos from iPhoto 9.5.1 into Lightroom 5.5.
    Does anyone know if there is a way to migrate iPhoto content -organised into Events- into Lightroom please?
    I am running iPhoto under OS X 10.9.4.

    iPhoto is not on the way out with the release of Yosemite. Apple have stated that it will be updated to run on Yosemite. That means that iPhoto will continue to run for another 18 months at least.  iPhoto will then be migrated into a new App, called Photos, sometime in 2015. This migration will include the seamless adapting of your iPhoto app to the new Library. Even then, iPhoto will still continue to run until you update to a version of the OS that doesn't run it at all. There has been a lot of discussion on the merits or otherwise of migrating to Lightroom. One thing is sure is that there is no rush, and it might be worth waiting to see what the new Photos app is like before making such a big decision.
    You've gone from using a consumer level Photo Manager (retail cost $15) to a using two very serious professional level applications (combined retail cost about $800 - if you could still buy Photoshop at retail at all.) Even at subscription rates thats $100+ per year. Are you sure that's what you want to do? That's a heck of a learning curve for a start.
    Anyway to cases:
    Lightroom has no ability at all to parse an iPhoto Library. There is no migration path at all. So you'll need to export your Events to folders in the Finder. Then import those to Lightroom.
    When you export you're going to have to choose which version to export - the original or the edited versions. Or both - and have duplicates in your Lightroom library. Also, you'll need to consider what to do with metadata that you may have added in iPhoto. Along the way you'll lose the non-destructive editing feature.
    This User Tip
    https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-4921
    has details of the options in the Export dialogue.

  • Using Muse, I was wondering if there is a way to convert a website that is already built into a mobile website.

    Using Muse, I was wondering if there is a way to convert a website that is already built into a mobile website. I have no idea how the website was originally built. My client is asking me to build a mobile site for his current site without touching his desktop site. His site was originally built in Dreamweaver I think but he have no way of finding the files and lost contact with his original designer. We don't want to start a new site from scratch with a new domain because he is afraid of losing his seo work.
    In other words. My client site was build in Dreamweaver or something else. I am not a programer and was going to use muse to make his mobile site. So the question is how do I link a muse made mobile site to his desktop site?
    Thank you.

        as62467 We appreciate your G3 question! Let's see how we can help. What you are able to adjust is the USB connection mode by going to the home screen and selecting'recent apps' (in the touch keys bar), settings,storage, the menu (the 3 tiny dots) and tap usb pc connection. If you do not want the software to try and install choose either the internet connection or camera option. Let us know if this helps.
    SheritaH_VZW
    Follow us on Twitter

  • Anyone having issues with importing CR2 files into lightroom 5 as error message comes up saying "Some import operations were not performed". please advise what is a solution please

    Urgent please
    anyone having issues with importing CR2 files into lightroom 5 as error message comes up saying "Some import operations were not performed". please advise what is a solution please

    Sounds like the folder Write permissions issue described here with a solution:
    "Some import operations were not performed" from camera import

  • Hi there! So I am using Lightroom 3 on a pc and I have ran into an issue when exporting images. The DPI and image size (in inches) that I am selecting during the export process. For example I just exported a collection and set the dpi to 180 and the size

    Hi there! So I am using Lightroom 3 on a pc and I have ran into an issue when exporting images. The DPI and image size (in inches) that I am selecting during the export process. For example I just exported a collection and set the dpi to 180 and the size to 7 inches on the long edge. My exported result is 457 dpi and sized at 3200x2134 pixels.. Any ideas on why this is happening and what I can do to correct it?

    The DPI setting in a digital image has no meaning at all. You need to learn how to calculate what you need in your exported image. The only measurement in a digital image that has any meaning is the number of pixels in each direction. It doesn't matter what you set that DPI to (actually it's PPI or pixels per inch). The image will have the same number of pixels regardless of the setting. If you need an image that is 5 x 7" (for example) at 200 PPI then you would want an image that measured:
    5 x 200 = 1000 pixels
    7 x 200 = 1400 pixels
    So you would need an image that is 1000 x 1400 pixels to have a 5 x 7" image at 200 PPI. The reason your exported image had such a high PPI setting is because you specified the number of inches you wanted the image to be. And there were enough pixels in the image that it calculated out to be that high PPI setting.
    I apologize, I don't explain this very well. But you need to learn to do the math to determine how large you really want your exported images to be.

  • Do you know if theres any plans to incorporate "Actions" into Lightroom as there currently are in Photoshop ?

    Just a quick question on Photoshop Actions.
    Does anyone know if theres any plans to incorporate Actions into Lightroom ? It would be great if there were Actions or Macros to speed up repetitive tasks.

    I think the most important question here is Rob's: "What would be your first macros/actions if such feature was supported?"
    Because Lightroom already automates corrections, but in a different (and sometimes better) way than Photoshop. For example, in Photoshop you might use an action to record a string of adjustments to contrast, local contrast, curves, cropping, and lens correction. That could be a pretty long action. But in Lightroom, all you have to do is make a single preset and when you do, all of those steps are applied in one instant instead of having to wait for many Photoshop action steps to complete. Same with exporting: In Photoshop, making an output-specific version can mean recording a lot of steps for resizing, color conversion, sharpening, etc. But since Lightroom lets you save all those as an Export Preset, once again it only takes an instant to apply it. So a lot of times, automating is actually easier and faster in Lightroom.
    What kind of automation are you after? Is it something that Lightroom presets haven't been able to cover?

  • Garage Band,  I am using an MBOX with a digi design audio core as a mic interface to recod into Garage Band.  Now when I Change the preferences to use the MBOX I can not move the recorder slider and there is no sound going into garage band?  Any solutions

    Garage Band,  I am using an MBOX with a digi design audio core as a mic interface to recod into Garage Band.  Now when I Change the preferences to use the MBOX I can not move the recorder slider and there is no sound going into garage band?  Any solutions

    10.5.8 with latest garageband 5.1 with MBOX 1. On Nov 4.09 I did a software update, now i get no output volume or input volume to the computer itself. I get it from head phones from my mbox, but not to the computer. Before the software update It worked great. I've tried upgrading software through digidesign .com, but they dont seem to have one for what i need. any way to get my old garage band back? go from 5.1 to earlier? Or maybe it was the upgrade to 10.5.8. update? Can i go back in time lol?
    Any help would be appreciated
    BTW
    Ive tried all the system sound prefs, and garage band drivers. Back and forth.
    cheers
    ds

  • How to use the BD menu built into the player in Encore CS4

    I cant get Encore to create a production that responds to the player Top Menu button (Panasonic Direct Navigator table). Cyberlink, which was bundled with the burner, does this by default. Place a number of videos into the production, dont create a menu, and OK!: Press the Top Menu button and the player's built in table pops up with a list of all titles.
    In Encore, press the Top Menu button, and you get 'operation not allowed'. It appears that Encore requires a Title button action?, but opening the player table is not an option. There is no Title button on the remote; there is Top Menu and Popup Menu.
    There's got to be a simple solution. Player menu tables have been around since DVDs.
    thanks

    I'm not aware of any method to access a menu system that is only built into hardware.  My own Sony DVD does not have such a menu, and if there is none on the DVD, I get none during playback no matter which buttons I press.
    The standard method is to add your own menu if you want a menu.

  • Process for exporting out of Aperture to import into Lightroom

    I'm trying to convert a large library of images that is presently cataloged in Aperture 2.0 into a Lightroom 2.0 Catalog.
    Aperture doesn't store the sidecar files with the raw files. Is there a procedure or plugin that will create sidecar files in the same location as the (raw) image files in a nested file structure, so that I can then import the images (where they are now on the disk) into Lightroom and retain all the information that was recorded in Aperture (e.g. star ratings, keywords)? There are many thousands of images, in a fairly complex nested file structure, and recreating the images or manually moving files where they need to be in the file structure would take many hours.
    If there is a FAQ on this topic, can someone simply kindly point me to the FAQ? I tried searching but was unable to find anything useful. I found solutions that exported the master files (duplicating ALL the image files) with xmp sidecars but as noted above this would be problematic given the size and structure of the files currently in Aperture.
    Thanks!

    There are 2 big problems with the export/duplication route:
    1) The files are in a fairly complicated nested structure, and they need to STAY in that nested structure.
    2) The time and disk space required to duplicate the entire library.
    I don't have iView, don't know enough about Applescript to do this myself. (If I did, I would have done it already after reading the threads here that referenced iView.)
    This is *extremely* frustrating. If this is a simple thing (for someone with the appropriate skillset) to write a plugin for, Adobe should have an employee or associate developer do it to ease the transition for new customers coming to Lightroom with a library already cataloged in Aperture.

  • Importing from camera into lightroom when camera is connected

    I used to be able to import photos into lightroom when my camera is connected. I somehow am no longer able to do this, maybe because of updates, but I am not sure? I am using version 1.3.1 on a pc running windows vista professional, and my camera is a Canon Rebel Xti. The problem I have is that using windows to import is too slow and it has caused duplicate filenames of files. So I'd love to be able to have lightroom import from the camera like it used to. Cheers

    Hello. I've seen photographers have portrait setups that have the camera connected to the computer, and as soon as they take a picture, the new image is imported.
    I tried using "auto import" but it's not working properly. I'm shooting Nikon D200 and it has 2 USB modes: P2P and Mass Storage. In the former, I can't have "auto import" on because it needs to read from a folder and it's being read as a "device" instead. In the latter, I'd have to disconnect the camera to take the picture, reconnect it, but it doesn't detect a change (new picture) and so it won't auto-upload. I also have Bridge CS3 which I believe should do what I want it to do, but can't find it on there either.
    Does anyone have a solution?

  • How do I import GPS information for all of my images from Bridge into Lightroom 5.3?

    After importing my images into Lightroom 5.3, I discovered that the GPS location data was imported for some images, but not for others.  When I checked the metadata files for the same images in Bridge, the location data was present for all of my recently downloaded images.
    Why would Lightroom import the GPS data for some images and not others?
    Is there any way to import the location data from the Bridge metadata files into Lightroom?

    Tony,
    Thank you for your suggestion.  I had already tried several approaches along those lines without success.  In the end, the GPS data was still present in Bridge metadata file for each image, but not in the Lightroom metadata files for the same images.
    So, I went back to Lightroom, and did some further exploring on the internet for solutions.  Just as I was wondering whether or not the problem might be rooted in my download presets (i.e., setting copyright into, etc.), I stumbled across a reference by a Pentax owner that identified the same problem.  Here's the link:
    http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/115-pentax-k-5/203274-gps-data-not-importing-into-light room-4-2-a.html
    In a nutshell, I can download all of the metadata, including the GPS location information, but only if I do NOT use any metadata presets.  If I use a metadata preset when downloading my images, no GPS data can be seen in the Lightroom metadata files, but it does import into Bridge's metadata files.  I've now tried this both ways, several times now, and have verified this result. 
    I also tried re-downloading images with no presets, and replacing (copying over) the image from my original download.  This did not solve the missing GPS data in the Lightroom metadata.  From this point, all that I could think of doing was removing all of my recent downloads from Lightroom, and starting over.  However, I'd already started editing my images, and I didn't want to lose that time.
    So, I re-downloaded all of my recent images from my memory cards as a copy into each file without any metadata presets.  Then, after selecting the copy first, followed by selecting the original (order is important), I toggled 'Sync Metadata' under the Metadata tab in Lightroom.  Voila, the GPS data appeared in the original metadata.  When this is done for all of my images, I will delete the second copies in my files.  Once I am satisfied that everything is okay, and my images are backed up satisfactorily, and only then, will I reformat my memory cards. 
    This whole experience has surfaced an interesting quirk in Lightroom, or in my Lightroom settings that I don't understand.  It may be something that Adobe might want to look into further, if others are finding a similar problem.

  • I can't import .mov and .mp4 videos into Lightroom 5? Why?

    I'm not able to import videos (iPhone) into Lightroom 5. I've tried .mov and .mp4. Is there a cause/fix for this?

    BradRW wrote:
    Is there a cause/fix for this?
    I've no idea the cause, nor a proper fix.
    But here is a possible interim solution:
    'Import Any Videos' script (free, by me):
    robcole.com - MiscLrScripts
    It just re-encodes (or re-wraps) the video into a format that Lr likes, which you can do without the script if you have the tools and the know-how..
    Rob

Maybe you are looking for