Is there a possibility should not consider available quantity at time of MR

Sir,
Is there a possibility should not consider available quantity at time of MRP planning?
Example:
Available stock: 100
Planning stock: 100 (MD61)
Schedule line to be generate: 100 Qty (Exclude the available quantity at time of MRP planning)
regards,
sampath

Dear Sampath/Raj,
1) Move the stock to particular storage location for which you don't want to be consider by MRP
2) Now go to OMIR t-code, input value as 1 for that particular storage location
3) Go to MMSC, input value as 1 for that particular storage location
4) Go to MRP - 4 view Down you can find field Storage location input value as 1
5) Now run MRP, system will not consider stock of that particular storage location
Regards
Madhu

Similar Messages

Is there any possiblity to not to take the print out before release of PO

Is there any possiblity to not to take the print out before release of PO.
Please give some inputs to set up this in system.

Hi,
Thank you for your reply with kindness.I will appreciate your help.
I found nothing like what you have mentioned .Please find the programme details in my system.Please help in this reagrd.
FUNCTION EXIT_SAPLMEDRUCK_001.
""Lokale Schnittstelle:
*"       IMPORTING
*"             REFERENCE(IX_DRUVO) TYPE DRUVO
*"       EXPORTING
*"             REFERENCE(EX_RETCO)
*"       CHANGING
*"             REFERENCE(CX_DOC) TYPE MEEIN_PURCHASE_DOC_PRINT
*"       EXCEPTIONS
*"              NO_OUTPUT
INCLUDE ZXM01U04 .
ENDFUNCTION.
Even-- nothing is avaialble in Include programme also.Please help in this regard.
What is my further action to this.

Delivery quantity should not exceed order quantity

Hi,
in delivery delivery quantity should not exceed order quantity what should i do
please let me now what should i do it is urgent
Thanks in advance
Srinivas

Hi,
You may consider an enhancement with a user exit:FORM USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE in include MV50AFZ1.
Here you can put additional conditions to check the delivery qty and also can put a message for the user to correct the delivery qty in case he has manully increased it.
Please reward points if this helps.
Hemant

GR Quantity should not exceed PO Quantity

Hi All,
Our client requirement is GR Quantity should not exceed PO Quantity. But when I checked the Purchasing Value Key, Under Delivery Tolerance and Over Delivery Tolerance was given as 10%. So I have removed it from Over Delivery Tol and gave Blank. So in material master it got updated.
But while creating a PO, in Delivery Tab, Over Delivery Tolerance by default is coming as 10%. How to remove this? They need it to be blank while raising a PO.
Please suggest.
Regards,
Rosh

Hi
Check the inforecord for the same (combination of material, vendor, plant).
And make the purchasing value key in inforecord as blank.
regards
prasanna

MTO not considering available raw materials

Here there are some available raw materials in unrestricted use. When any new sales order is generated for MTO finished material it is generating a new purchase requisition for the same raw material ( since that raw material is not assigned to the sales order ). But here client is asking that it should consider the available raw material only when they generate any new sales order for finished product and it should not generate any new PR

Hi
For raw materials in MRP- 4 view give individual/coll field as 2 which is collective requirement. It will consider. Do it only for raw material.
Regards
Antony

"BlackBerry PlayBook should not be available in the Republic of Ireland"

DO NOT BUY A BLACKBERRY PLAYBOOK IF YOU LIVE IN IRELAND BECAUSE IT WILL NOT WORK AND BLACKBERRY WILL NOT HELP ANYONE IN IRELAND.
HERE'S MY STORY ("HAVE A GREAT DAY!"):
This is the complete message I sent (with a lot of difficulty) to "Blackberry Support" on 3 September 2012:
"I have just received my Blackberry Playbook bought online from PC World in Ireland, where I live. I cannot setup the unit because Ireland does not appear in the list of countries for the Agreement.
In order to register my product I have the same problem: Ireland does not exist as an option. In order to register my product and send this message I was forced to choose "UK" even though I live in Ireland, which is a totally different country.
Please tell me how to get past the Agreement screen on my Playbook."
This is the complete reply I received from "Brad" at "Blackberry Customer Support" (about 6 hours later):
Thank you for contacting BlackBerry Customer Support. We are pleased to assist you.
I'm sorry to hear that you were not able to setup or register the BlackBerry PlayBook in Ireland.
At this time the BlackBerry PlayBook should only be available in Northern Ireland (aka the United Kingdom). The BlackBerry PlayBook should not available in the Republic of Ireland, at present.
If you require further assistance, please feel free to contact us either by replying to this message or by calling us at one of the numbers below.
I will be pending your case for the next two (2) days, at which time I will email you to see if the problem is resolved.
Thank you again for contacting us. Have a great day.
Sincerely,
Brad
BlackBerry Customer Support
Research In Motion Limited
Tel:
Canada Toll Free: 1-877-644-8405
United States Toll Free: 1-877-644-8410
Puerto Rico Toll Free: 1-855-651-4936
Email: [email protected]
Web: www.blackberry.com

Jarviser, I am simply stating the facts about Blackberry not wanting people in Ireland to buy the Playbook. I know it is hard to believe but, I'll say it again, Ireland is NOT in the list of countries in the Blackberry Playbook setup menu. Therefore it is NOT possible to setup the Playbook as a resident of Ireland. Jarviser, you are totally wrong to assume that the only country not listed is Cyprus and your questioning of my facts is not appropriate.
Yes, it does sound unbelievable but Ireland (Eire, Republic of Ireland, Irish Republic) is also NOT in the list of countries where the new owner can legally register the product. The so-called "Blackberry Support" is ONLY available AFTER the product has been registered – which is why it was difficult for me to even get a message to "Support" at all.
A few Irish customers may be willing to register using a false address in the UK or another country but, as well as being totally against the moral principles of many Irish people, it would also mean potential legal and practical problems with returning faulty products, guarantees, etc.
On another moral point: Blackberry is selling Playbooks to PC World/Curries in Ireland, knowing that they cannot be legally registered and knowing that many customers will simply not be able to setup and use the Playbooks at all because they can't get past the initial setup and registration process. The only option for many people will be to return the Playbook to PC World/Curries for a refund, after a lot of frustration and disappointment with Blackberry.
As a PR exercise, Blackberry is really shooting itself at a time when it already has lost a lot of customers to rivals and is in serious financial difficulties. Whoever is running Blackberry needs to wake up to the real problems the company is facing, including this dishonest selling of Playbooks in Ireland. Do any of them ever even read these forums?

Sales orders with expired dates should not consider in MRP

Hi,
My requirement is that when i m running MRP for sales order for which expiry date has already been lapsed or over.sysyem should not create any mrp elements(Planned order) for such Sales orders.
We have maintained one Z table which gives the validity period(Expiry date) for sales order according to their respective division.
if MRP running date lies after the date of expiry of sales order, system shoul not allow to run MRP for that sales order or it should pop some message while executing MRP run before saving it.
How we can achieve this?
Pls suggest.....
Rgds,
Yogesh Thorat..

Since as per standard, there is no concept called validity period for sale order and you are maintaining in a zee table, definitely your requirement has to be met with user exit or function module or some enhancements.
Perhaps, you can try with MRP Enhancements
a) LMDR2001 or
b) LMDZU001
to meet your requirement.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Production order and planned order qty should not consider in MRP

Dear All,
i do not want to consider the previous month production order qty and plenned order qty (Nothing but WIP qty) in the current momth MRP, but the stock has to consider in MRP.
Example,
Before MRP,
material : XYZ
Stock : 1000
Prod Qty : 500 for 02.04.2008
PIR Qty : 2000 for 02.05.2008
After MRP, the requirement should be as below said,
material : XYZ
Stock : 1000
Prod Qty : 500 for 02.04.2008
PIR Qty : 2000 for 02.05.2008
Pld OrdQty : 1000 for 02.05.2008
For the above requirement ,i have done settings in the availabilty check like , for include planned order and include production order are "DO NOT TAKE IN ACCOUNT".
Even then also the planned order qty is generating for the "500" only.
please give the solution for the above said requirement.
thanx in advance
Regards
Srinivas

hi
MRP will always consider the prod order qty while doing nert req calculation.One thing u can do is TECo the prod orders and un MRP then it wont consider prod order qty.
The Availability check will check whether the components r avalaible or not based on ur scope of check
Reward points if useful
Amit

Smart Guides should not consider clipped away art

Illustrator always seems to have trouble with parts of art that are hidden in clipping masks. If parts of an object are 'clipped away', then that's it. They shouldn't be seen, selectable or anything by anything except the Direct Selection Tool, right?
In older versions you were able to select a portion of an object which was hidden beyond the bounds of a clipping mask. Thank god, you fixed that one.
My current problem, though, is that I need to use Smart Guides to snap a print ad to a new artboard. But I can't get it to work because rather than recognizing the border of the ad, it's trying to snap the hidden portion of "clipped away" art. (See photo)

I don't have that problem (CS5). I am using the selection tool and able to snap the clipped imaged to the artboard edge.

Order reservation should not get planned in mrp run

Hello friends,
Actually for a finished material i have created one production order by CO01.Because of it for semi finished material system created order reservation.I dont have any stock of semi finished material.Now i want while running the mrp run system should not planned this Order reservation of semifinished material.For these in configuration of availability check (Scope of check T.C OPJJ), I made the settings that system should not consider reservation (i deactivated the tick for include reservation) and for include depend reservation , i selected Donot check.And all these settings i made in checking group 02 and checking rule PP.After doing all these settings than also system is considering the order reservation for semifinished material and generating the planned order for it.
Do i need to do any other configurations?
Thanking you guys in advance.

Hi Jitendra,
Checking Control (OPJJ) has no relation with MRP.It is useful in the case of Plan and Production / Process Order only to find out Missing part.
Now come to MRP again.
You have a choice of only 3 type of stocks to include or exclude them during MRP run while rest of the things like (PO,PR,Reservation etc are consider by default)
Go to OPPQ and after selecting Plant go to Available Stock.You will find that options,
- Stock in Transfer
- Block Stock
- Restricted Stock.
And one more thing Reservation is not a available stock but its one kind requirement and if there is no stock then system will activate the Planning file entry and during next MRP run it will generate Planning proposal also.
Regards,
Dhaval

In-house production time not considered in scheduling

i have a material, with an in-house production time of 7. requirements date is today, May 23. as a sap standard, using backward scheduling, it shall see that the start day lies in the past, and should switch to forward scheduling, with May 23 as the start date, and may 30 as the finish date. however, the system only proposes a finish date of may 27. why is the system behaving this way?

Hi,
Please let us explain, where u have carried out scheduling ie during the MRP or in Production order.
I hope ur asking about Production order scheduling , inthat case system will not consider the Inhouse production time. Because lead time scheduling is carried in production order.
Scheduling will be done for routing times not for In-house production time.
Pradeep

Delivery quantity should not exceed order or confirm quantity

Dear Friends,
How to handle a below scenario,
Sales order is for 100 Tons.Partial delivery is allowed.
Now delivery quantity should be equal to 100 Tons.Delivery quantity should not exceed order quantity.
I mean delivery quantity must be equal to order quantity.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Shrikant

Dear Ram/Ramnath,
I have maintained the B for Check Overdelivery.Transaction code used is 0vlp.Item catg is TAN
Check Quantity 0 is A
Check Minimum Quantity is A
Now I ahve created a Sales Order for 10 Tons.
Created two delivery notes of 4 tons and 8 tons respectively.
While creating second delivery for 8 tons I do not get any error message.
Transaction code VOV7.Here completion rule is blank as it is relevant for Quotation and contracts.
Is there anything need to do?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Shrikant

Statements which should not use in BADIs

One Question ...
Any specific statements are there which we should not use in BADIs ?
Thanks

Hi,
BADI is an OO ABAP approach, therefore any statement which won't work in the OO context won't work here! Instead breaking your head on what is to be used? and what not? , run a "code inspector" and "EPC" on your implementation class.it will show list of illegal statements in your BADI implementation
Regards
Naren

Difference between 2 timestamp,not considering the weekends (SATURDAY,SUN)

I use an Oracle XE and I have a table which has the following Timestamp columns
A_Date Timestamp
R_Date Timestamp
Now in this query i need to be able to exclude the SAT/SUN and show the difference between these 2 timestamp dates.
Could any one help on this?
I use this query to find out the difference between the 2 dates (R_DATE - A_DATE),showing the DAYS:HOURS:MIN:SECS
TRUNC (TO_NUMBER (SUBSTR ((R_DATE - A_DATE),
1,
INSTR (R_DATE - A_DATE, ' ')
|| ':'
|| SUBSTR ((R_DATE - A_DATE),
INSTR ((R_DATE - A_DATE), ' ') + 1,
2
|| ':'
|| SUBSTR ((R_DATE - A_DATE),
INSTR ((R_DATE - A_DATE), ' ') + 4,
2
|| ':'
|| SUBSTR ((R_DATE - A_DATE),
INSTR ((R_DATE - A_DATE), ' ') + 7,
2
) "TTR"
Example : A_DATE := '11-Dec-2009 19:33:30 PM' ---> Friday
R_DATE := '14-Dec-2009 07:32:38 AM' ---> Monday
should not consider the SAT/SUN that comes between them.
Thanks
GAG

SQL> create table t as (
2 select to_timestamp('11-dec-2009 07:33:30 PM') rdate
3 ,      to_timestamp('14-dec-2009 07:32:38 AM') adate
4 from   dual
5 );
Table created.
SQL> select rdate
2 ,      adate
3         /* do some final formatting */
4 ,      to_number(substr(diff_incl_weekend, 1, instr( diff_incl_weekend, chr(32))))
5         ||':'||
6         substr(diff_incl_weekend, instr( diff_incl_weekend, chr(32))+1, 8) diff_incl_weekend
7 ,      to_number(substr(diff_excl_weekend, 1, instr( diff_excl_weekend, chr(32))))
8         ||':'||
9         substr(diff_incl_weekend, instr( diff_excl_weekend, chr(32))+1, 8) diff_excl_weekend
10 from ( /* substract intervals */
11         select to_char(rdate, 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM') rdate
12         ,      to_char(adate, 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM') adate
13         ,      trim('+'
14                from
15                numtodsinterval((to_date(to_char(adate, 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM'), 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM')
16                                 -
17                                 to_date(to_char(rdate, 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM'), 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM')
18                                )
19                               , 'day')
20                    ) diff_incl_weekend
21         ,      trim('+'
22                from
23                numtodsinterval((to_date(to_char(adate, 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM'), 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM')
24                                 -
25                                 to_date(to_char(rdate, 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM'), 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM')
26                                 -
27                                 nof_satsuns.total
28                                )
29                               , 'day')
30                    ) diff_excl_weekend
31         from   t
32         ,      /* calculate nof sats and suns*/
33              ( select count(dy) total
34                from ( select to_char(rdate+level-1, 'dy') dy
35                       from   t
36                       where to_char(rdate+level-1, 'dy', 'nls_date_language=american') in ('sat','sun')
37                       connect by level <= trunc(to_date(to_char(adate, 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM'), 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM'))
38                                           -
39                                           trunc(to_date(to_char(rdate, 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM'), 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM'))+1
40                     )
41              ) nof_satsuns
42      );
RDATE                   ADATE                   DIFF_INCL_WEEKEND                                 DIFF_EXCL_WEEKEND
11-dec-2009 07:33:30 PM 14-dec-2009 07:32:38 AM 2:11:59:08                                        0:11:59:08

Some words end up being underscored when they should not be

I end up with some words dbl underscored at a site when using fire fox and they should not be
== This happened ==
Every time Firefox opened
== since i installed ff on here

Those are usually IntelliTxt type links.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IntelliTXT
You can look at Adblock Plus: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/1865
You need to subscribe to a ''Filter list'' (e.g. the ''EasyList''): http://adblockplus.org/en/subscriptions
Adblock Plus forum: https://adblockplus.org/forum/

Is there a possibility should not consider available quantity at time of MR

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for