Is there a way to disable alerts for updates on unused droid razr m factory installed apps?

Is there a way to disable the alerts for unused droid razor m factory installed aps?  Or how can I manage the settings so these do not pop up?  I literally have used none of their pre-installed apps in 2 years.  I would prefer they just do whatever it is they do in the background.

If you go into the application manager and disable those apps, that will uninstall updates and stop future update attempts

Similar Messages

  • Is there any way to raise alerts for stock outages in inventory

    Is there any way to raise alerts for stock outages in inventory

    You can use the Check Material Shortages attribute in the Org items under Inventory tab. Oracle will trigger shortage alert notifucations for the checked items. This works in the conjuntion with the Shortage Parameters defined at the Inv ORg level (these parameters are nothing but what business wants to consider as a shortage in WIP and OM). You can notify the cmp planner/buyer , assy planner/job creator..

  • Is there any way to disable caching for a particular component?

    I have a component which should always produce the output by executing a code and not from the dispatcher cache.
    Is there any way to clear the dispatcher cache for the component or is it possible to disable the component caching.

    Praveen-
    The dispatcher caches the entire HTTP response body, so doing what you are describing actually requires two steps:
    1) Loading the non-cacheable component through Ajax (or some other edge side assembly technology like ESI)
    2) Including the Dispatcher: no-cache header in the response when that component is requested.
    #1 is pretty easy to do with jQuery
    #2 is covered here: http://dev.day.com/content/kb/home/Dispatcher/faq-s/DispatcherNoCache.html
    You will probably want to use the WCMMode to only do the dynamic loading on the publish server.
    HTH,
    Justin

  • Is there a way to disable interrupts for a Solaris 9/ sun OS 5.9 machine

    I am trying to figure out if there is a way to disable interrupts in solaris 9 on a sun 5.9 sparc9 machine, while under lock. I don't want the process to get bumped under lock. I have been looking for a way to do it and have come up empty handed. Am I just missing something? -Thanks

    Thanks for the response, I understand that using real time scheduling I can still be preempted. I also understand how to solve my problem on a multiple CPU machine. Unfortunately I only have that luxery on part of the system. There is a part of the system, 7% of the processes, that run on a single cpu machine. This is a customer requirement, I can't change it. What I want to do is possibly take advantage of the priority inheritance features of the mutex locks, however, I believe this needs to be enacted as root, since they need to run real time and it seems that you need to be root to enable the real time features. However, to propose this as an option to solve my issue, I need to show that it works. I have kicked off a process using priocntl with RT and a priority of 11, and I can see them run as real time and in a priority level of 111 using TOP, but when I put code in so I know they are in the mutex portion of the code, I don't see a priority change. I created a mutex with the protect option and a priority ceiling of 5. Does anyone know if this would be reflected anywhere. I tried opening an xterm and using a priocntl -d, but I see priority 11 even when it is in a mutex with a ceiling of 5. I would have expected it to go to five. Just in case I had the levels backwards, I also tried a ceiling of twenty and there still was no change. How can I test the priority inheritance capability? Does anyone know which call would reflect the priority change? I just need to show it does something in order to propose the change at that low of a level in our system code. Thanks again everyone who has tried to help me understand this.

  • Is there ANY way to disable internet for specific wired MACs?

    I have been looking for a way to restrict specific MAC addresses from routing to the internet with my AEBS. The Access tab is labeled that it allows internet access for only the MACs in the list which is incorrect, it restricts connections to the AEBS entirely (not just to the internet).

    That is correct - Access Control cannot be used to limit wireless clients from accessing just the internet. Access Control also has no influence at all on restricting access by wired clients - it only influences connections by wireless clients.
    I assume the purpose of this is to find a way for a parent to limit internet access from one of their child's computers? If so, you should instead use software on the Mac itself, like the MacOS 10.4 "parental controls" feature.

  • Is there any way to disable Firefox from updating my browser?

    I have been an ardent Firefox user ever since Firefox began, having created innumerable Firefox users through the effusive enthusiasm in which I have promoted Firefox to others. But the manner in which Firefox has been demonstrating its total disdain for its loyal cadre of users like myself has me infuriated to no end, to the point of dumping Firefox altogether out of sheer frustration, anger with Firefox's absolute disregard to the requests of its users, who have pleaded to have a mechanism in which the all-too frequent updates wreaks havoc with our lives, livelihood.
    The worst aspect of Firefox's dictatorial approach is the manner in which truth is the first casualty in
    having a process to disable the update process which is very much akin to the manner in which Foie gras is produced. I have been given all sorts of advice, guidance on how to disable the update process
    none of which have done a wit to fulfill my request of the specific needs of a browser that serves my interest and purpose, one in which is very much entwined with the work I do online as what I do for a living.
    The insults Firefox perpetuates against users like me in providing phony approaches that in the end
    turn out to be just another dead end is nothing short of nefarious. My attempt for the umpteenth
    time in trying to put a stop to these updates is a terrible business practice, doing the worst sort of harm, to those who have been most loyal to the Firefox cause.
    Just today, despite applying every sort of suggestion to stop these infernal updates, Firefox has once
    again found a new way to bring me closer to becoming forever alienated.
    This morning I noticed browsers all on five computers updated when I specifically had in place every
    contingency for disabling these updates and so once again, I deleted every last remnant of Firefox off of my computer and started anew with a browser from Old Apps.com after going through my checklist
    of steps to insure the updates will never cross my path again.
    But despite doing everything to stop it, checking never to be updated, having extensions applied manually and a host of other faux approaches to disable the updates, I nearly lost it when noticing
    that all computers were displaying the latest updates.
    After today's latest debacle with the game you play with us users, it came to me like a ton of bricks falling loose right on top of me, how on a smaller scale,you, your tactics, your total obliviousness to the requests needs of our users, reminded me of Microsoft in its heyday.
    That's a very sad,tragic legacy to be reminiscent of.

    You can install Firefox ESR, '''which updates every year, but is aimed for IT and biz users.''' We also dont support it here, but '''you can install it''', the current version is 17.0.7.
    * https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/all
    Or another solution is to go to FIrefox button > Options > Advanced > Update > Disable Auto updates
    If disabling autoupdate doesnt work you can see [[How to fix preferences that won't save]].
    Hopefully you found my advice well!

  • How can I set Firefox update preferences via script so I can configure our 200 Macs to disable checking for updates?

    Most of our Mac users do not have admin privileges. So when they get alerted about Firefox updates, they don't have the ability to install them. We would like to disable Firefox for checking for updates, then push out updates from our software server as needed. We have about 200 machines to configure. Is there a way to disable checking for updates via script (bash or Applescript)? And if so, is there a guide or web site to explain the process?

    Use a mozilla.cfg file in the Firefox program folder to lock prefs or specify default values.
    Place a file local-settings.js in the defaults\pref folder where you also find the file channel-prefs.js to specify using mozilla.cfg.
    pref("general.config.filename", "mozilla.cfg");
    pref("general.config.obscure_value", 0); // use this to disable the byte-shift
    See:
    * http://kb.mozillazine.org/Locking_preferences
    You can use these functions in mozilla.cfg:
    defaultPref(); // set new default value
    pref(); // set pref, but allow changes in current session
    lockPref(); // lock pref, disallow changes

  • Is there any way to disable paid downloades on itunes

    Is there any way to disable paid downloades on itunes. I will never load paid apps.

    iPadDude15 wrote:
    Is there any way to disable paid downloades on itunes. I will never load paid apps.
    Yes.  Edit > Preferences > Parental, and check the box for "Disable - iTunes Store."
    Also, go into your account payment information, and make sure the credit card is set to "None."

  • The hotkey for Private Browsing ( CTRL Shift P ) interferes with another program I have running in the background. Is there a way to disable or change the Firefox Hotkey?

    Question:
    The hotkey for Private Browsing (<CTRL><Shift> <P>) interferes with another program I have running in the background. Is there a way to disable or change the Firefox Hotkey?

    You can try this extension:
    *Customizable Shortcuts: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/customizable-shortcuts/

  • Is there a way to disable the swiping back and forward for safari?

    It is the most annoying thing in the world to be surfing the web, press back then while trying to move around the page be forced forward because of this stupid swipe back and forward function. Is there some way to disable it or should I just burn my ipod?

    Sorry, but this doesn't seem to be an iTunes for Windows question. Perhaps you meant to post in the iPod touch forum?

  • Is there any way to disable face recognition in the latest Yosemite update for Photos?

    Is there any way to disable face recognition in the latest Yosemite update for Photos?

    Ingenico has a 1D Bluetooth barcode scanner certified MFi by Apple.
    http://baracoda.ingenico.com/Baracoda-i-fly.aspx
    Baracoda i-Fly is compatible with Apple iPod touch, iPhone and iPad.
    Baracoda i-Fly supports IAP Bluetooth profile and is MFi certified, which means it is 100% compatible with Apple development standards and performances.
    Its Bluetooth connection is bidirectional, which enables the i-Fly to transmit data both ways in mode « No Data Loss »).
    Furthermore, Firmware update is also possible, which is not the case for non-MFi certified devices.

  • Is there any way to disable right click and drag and drop for photos on iweb?

    Re: protecting photos when using iweb as your web designer...
    Is there any way to disable right click and drag and drop for photos using iweb?  I have seen tutorials about creating a text box around each image - but is there a better way? 

    However, there is no way you can prevent someone from making a screenshot of the image as it is displayed on the screen no matter what application you use to create the web page.
    You can add a watermark to dissuade the casual "thief" but those who are serious about stealing the photo for their own use can remove the watermark with some effort.
    OT

  • Is there any way to disable preview-icons & fileinfo for connected drives?

    Is there any way to disable preview-icons & fileinfo for connected drives?
    i.e. when i'm connecting to SMB share, and i see .mp4 file, i see icon change to video-frame.
    and when i see folder, i see "5 items"
    and i wanna disable it per-dir or per-connect.

    Praveen-
    The dispatcher caches the entire HTTP response body, so doing what you are describing actually requires two steps:
    1) Loading the non-cacheable component through Ajax (or some other edge side assembly technology like ESI)
    2) Including the Dispatcher: no-cache header in the response when that component is requested.
    #1 is pretty easy to do with jQuery
    #2 is covered here: http://dev.day.com/content/kb/home/Dispatcher/faq-s/DispatcherNoCache.html
    You will probably want to use the WCMMode to only do the dynamic loading on the publish server.
    HTH,
    Justin

  • Is there any way to disable update check for a specific add-on?

    There are a few add-ons I have problems with their latest versions. So i don't want to update them. But everytime there are any updates for other add-ons they also appear and need to be unchecked. Is there any way to disable update just for them permanently?

    Yes, but it is not straightforward. For details see [http://kb.mozillazine.org/Updating_add-ons Updating add-ons - MozillaZine Knowledge Base]

  • The external GPS is used only for 911 but the device will not op without it...this causes great inconvenience for me, having to run that cable to a window in the trwo houses I use it..ids there a way to disable the GPS if I do not care about the 911 funct

    the external GPS is used only for 911 but the device will not operate without it...this causes great inconvenience for me, having to run that cable to a window in the two houses I use it..is there a way to disable the GPS if I do not care about the 911 functionability..?  this is the only downside I have with the network extender and it renders my device useless..

    Nope, GPS is a Federal requirement for anything operating a cellular telephone signal.  You don't ever plan to call 911 until you are in an emergency.  I don't see that requirement changing any time soon.
    If you are truly inconvenienced by the VZW network extender then perhaps you should disable you calling features in these areas and swap over to WiFi only.  There are many services and apps out there that can route your phone services through internet service providers. 

Maybe you are looking for