Is there a way to have Adobe Acrobat run in the background while scanning documents?

This was working fine up until last week and then all of a sudden, the scanning program overrides anything else I'm doing on the computer (such as typing an email, etc).  I'm not sure if a recent update removed that setting, but I'd like to be scanning documents, but not have to wait until it's done to have my computer back.  Does anyone know how to change this?

My organization is having this same issue.  Our scanners were using 9.2 Acrobat standardard to scan.  While they were scanning, they could switch focus to another application and work while scanning continued in the background.  Now, the twain driver grabs focus at the start of every page.  This must have happened because of an upgrade.  Any thoughts or feedback would be appreciated considering this has affected our productivity.

Similar Messages

  • Is there a way to have Adobe Acrobat reader default to a higher version?

    Hi,
    We've pin-pointed the cause of an issue where in MS Excel we hyperlink a PDF file & our user is using Adobe Acrobat v7 & when the user clicks on it. The PDF pops up & just disappears.
    I've located the fix for it on MS Discussion Forums below:
    If you have version 7, you need to upgrade to version 7.0.8 to get a fix for this bug in Acrobat.
    But what we need to know is, if they have Adobe V7 installed, we can install v8 for them. But is there a way of having V8 set as a default reader?
    This may sound like a stupid question but my work colleague wanted me to ask.
    Thanks,
    PS

    It's not recommended nor supported to have both installed unless you're running Macs.
    Not being able to choose a default version is just one of the many issues.

  • Is there a way to keep apps from running in the background?

    I just updated to an Iphone 6, with the latest version of IOS.  It's a great product, but for me there is one annoyance.  There are times when my memory gets low.  I find out that it's the apps that are running in the background.  I personally don't use this.  All it does is hog memory.  Then, to close the apps, you have to close each one individually.  I forgot how many apps I have open, I'm of the mindset that when I close the app, that it's "really" closed, not still running in the background.  It would be nice if there was a way to disable this function.  It doesn't seem to serve a purpose for me in the way I use the Iphone.  I just "cleaned up my list of "behind the scenes apps" and I had about 20.  It gets frustrating to have to go to each one to close it.  Any comments or suggestions?

    Some things that might help:
    1. Only the most recently used apps actually occupy memory (used to be the most recent 4, but may have changed in the latest iPhones). After 4 (or so), IOS writes them out of active memory, as it does for even the latest 4 if there's no activity for a long time. So the business of closing all the open apps, apart from the most recent ones doesn't make a difference. Tis article has a good explanation:
    http://www.speirs.org/blog/2012/1/2/misconceptions-about-ios-multitasking.html
    2. There are settings about background app activity that might help:
    - Settings, General, Background App Refresh controls which apps can update their data in the background
    - Settings, Notifications controls which apps can tell you things, which they have to wake up to do.
    - Settings, Privacy, Location Services controls which apps monitor your location - another activity that uses resources
    Hope some of that helps

  • Is there a way to stop apps from running in the background on my 3gs?

    I was told that apps could be "turned off" in the iphone, which saves on battery life and removes the apps from the main screen, placing them in a scrollable line at the bottom. I even saw the guy do it! Now, I can't figure out how he did it!

    Hold till it wiggles is for the apps that will show up in the multi-tasking bar. This is the group to the bottom of the phone, just above the home button. I don't mean trying to delete apps off the home screen.
    Check page 19 in the User Guide http://manuals.info.apple.com/en_US/iphone_user_guide.pdf. That should explain it.

  • I have created a PDF and password protected it for view. However, when reading the PDF in Adobe Reader app on the iPad the commenting and annotation options are not available. Is there a way to allow commenting and annotation in the app while password pro

    I have created a PDF and password protected it for view. However, when reading the PDF in Adobe Reader app on the iPad the commenting and annotation options are not available. Is there a way to allow commenting and annotation in the app while password protecting the document?

    Is there a setting that needs to be set to allow the annotation features?  I set password protection to open and then password for editing and set it to Any except page extraction, but it still did not give the annotation option

  • RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the samemachine

    Sean,
    I mean I am always connecting to the nodemgr of the 2nd environment
    successfully. Only when I run the client part of the application that I know
    is up, I get a response from the Name Server that it is actually the first
    IP address.
    I checked again. I defenitely have FORTE_NS_ADDRESS set to IP:5004, in my
    case, and not the hostname. I don't have FORTE_LOCATIONS set any where. the
    NS_ADDRESS for env2 has only 1 IP address associated with it. My Forte
    Control Panel on the client, and hence the NS address has only one entry.
    I tried going into escript like you said, and the name service still thinks
    it is IP1.
    Venkat Kodumudi
    Price Waterhouse LLP
    Internet: [email protected]
    Internet2: [email protected]
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Sean Brown [SMTP:[email protected]]
    Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 1:31 PM
    To: Venkat Kodumudi; 'Sean Brown'
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same
    machine
    Hmmmm? That is a little odd! Let me rehash what I think you are saying.
    You now have two environments each with their own name service with
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS set to a different IP:Port combination. For example you
    are doing the steps:
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS=255.255.255.1:5000
    start the nodemgr for env 1
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS=255.255.255.2:5000
    start the nodemgr for env 2
    Now when you start a client you are always getting the address for env 1
    back from the nodemgr. I assume you actually mean the name service? Or, do
    you mean you are always connecting to the nodemgr & name service for env
    1?
    If the first scenario is the case and you are connecting to the nodemgr
    for
    env 2 but getting back IP's for services listening on the card for env 1 I
    would ask you what you are setting the FORTE_LOCATIONS value to before you
    start each service. If you are not setting it or are using the host name
    it
    will register using the IP for the primary network card associated with
    the
    machine name and I am again assuming that this is env 1. You need to set
    the FORTE_LOCATIONS variable to 255.255.255.2:0 (based on the steps above)
    before starting your services.
    If the second scenario is the case I would have you check what the
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS is set to before you start up the client. Once again it
    must be the IP:Port combination not host:port combination if you want to
    get
    anything other than the primary card.
    I would also suggest that you do the following. After everything is up
    and
    running execute the following commands:
    escript -fns "ip for env1":port
    findsub nameservice
    showpart
    What you should see is everything currently registered under the name
    service. It will have the name and any "locations" (IP and port) that it
    is
    registered as listening on. I would look for the nodemgr and see where it
    has advertised itself. I would then look for any services you expect to
    be
    registered there and also verify where the have advertised themselves. If
    there are multiple locations listed for any one service, the client will
    use
    the first one in the list.
    Do the same for env 2.
    Sean
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Venkat Kodumudi [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 9:57 AM
    To: 'Sean Brown'
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same machine
    I am giving the actual IP address. and not the host name. That is why I
    don't understand what is going on.
    Venkat Kodumudi
    Price Waterhouse LLP
    Internet: [email protected]
    Internet2: [email protected]
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Sean Brown [SMTP:[email protected]]
    Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 10:53 AM
    To: Venkat Kodumudi; 'Sean Brown'
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same
    machine
    Hello Venkat,
    I probably should have mentioned this before. Your are correct. Forteis
    doing a host lookup if you are providing a name for examplemachine1:5000.
    You can bypass the host lookup by using the actual ip dot addressinstead
    for example 255.255.255.255:5000. This way you are taking the name
    service
    out od the picture and Forte will use the address provided.
    Sean
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Venkat Kodumudi [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 9:27 AM
    To: 'Sean Brown'
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same machine
    My requirement is that my second card serves as best case performance
    testing piece. This eliminates the network completely. We went one step
    ahead and created a new enviromnent for the second card. Whatever I do,
    the
    nodemgr is returning back the IP address of the first card, even thoughmy
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS does not have the first card in the picture any where.
    I think Forte is doing a host look up and returning the first IP address
    it
    finds, as opposed to returning the IP address specified in theenvironment
    variable FORTE_NS_ADDRESS. Is there a way to trick it?
    Venkat Kodumudi
    Price Waterhouse LLP
    Internet: [email protected]
    Internet2: [email protected]
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Sean Brown [SMTP:[email protected]]
    Sent: Thursday, June 18, 1998 9:54 AM
    To: Venkat Kodumudi
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same
    machine
    OK, you ran into one of the issues. That is, if both addresses areknown
    to
    the client that is trying to contact the partition it will always usethe
    first address in FORTE_LOCATIONS. This is because FORTE_LOCATIONS was
    designed more as a failover mechanism. So it will always try the
    first
    address in the list and if it succeeds, there is no reason to move onto
    the
    second.
    Now, the second issue is that there is currently a problem with theclient
    failover to the secondary address in FORTE_LOCATIONS. If the firstentry
    fails it is supposed to retry on the second entry. Instead, it
    retries
    the
    first entry again. I know that Forte knows about this but I do nothave
    a
    bug number on it.
    With that said, lets look at a possible solution for you. If the real
    objective here is to have a back up network card available for fail
    over
    on
    the same machine, or use one card to advertise outside your firewalland
    one
    to use inside, then you will have to contact Forte to determine whenthe
    failover problem will be fixed. But, if the objective is to loadbalance
    across the network cards you could have the environment manager listenon
    both ports and then alternate your server partitions across both
    cards.
    For
    example:
    set FORTE_NS_ADDRESS=card1:5000;card2:5000 and then start up the
    environment
    manager
    set FORTE_LOCATIONS=card1:0 (the 0 in the port causes the OS to pick a
    port)
    and start partition one
    set FORTE_LOCATIONS=card2:0 and start partition two
    and so on....
    In this scenario the environment manager will be listening on bothcards
    but
    each server will be listening on only one of the two cards. So if a
    request
    comes in for partition1 it will go through card one and if it is for
    partition two it will go through card two. You could assign your
    partitions
    to cards based on expected load.
    Well, I am done. I hope this helps!
    Sean
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Venkat Kodumudi [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent: Thursday, June 18, 1998 8:06 AM
    To: 'Sean Brown'; 'John Jamison'
    Cc: [email protected]; Jose Suriol
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the samemachine
    Sean,
    Thanks for your reply. I tried the approach. I was not very specificin
    my
    question. I do need the ability for server applications to listen and
    server
    on both the network cards.
    I was succesfully able to make the nodemgr listen on both the cardsand
    actually serve requests coming in from both the cards. But, followingyour
    advise, I took a cautious step with FORTE_LOCATIONS. Here is what I
    noticed.
    I have an application that has 6 partitions in total. I used
    FORTE_LOCATION
    to make it listen on 1. Both the cards. 2. Swapped the IP addresses
    for
    both
    cards for this application. 3. One card that I want it to listen on. I
    tried
    all approaches by exporting the locations variable for just this
    application. The nodemgr recieves a request from this pc connected onthe
    second card to talk to one of the partitions. The node mgr responds
    with
    a
    proxy - with the ip address and socket number of the first card. The
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS variable looks like this:
    IP1:5002;IP2:5002.
    Is it possible atall to resolve my problem, without having a seperate
    environment?
    Thanks
    Venkat Kodumudi
    Price Waterhouse LLP
    Internet: [email protected]
    Internet2: [email protected]
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Sean Brown [SMTP:[email protected]]
    Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 1998 10:42 AM
    To: 'John Jamison'; Venkat Kodumudi
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the
    same
    machine
    Venkat,
    Actually, it is possible for Forte to listen on more than one IP andport
    combination. The first reply to your message was correct. If you
    set
    the
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS to contain multiple entries before starting the
    name
    service, it will advertise on both. For Forte servers you use the
    FORTE_LOCATIONS env variable to get it to advertise on multipleip:port
    combinations.
    We were doing something very similar with another customer I was at
    to
    get
    around a firewall. I will warn you that there are some issues with
    FORTE_LOCATIONS that may keep that portion from working. However,
    from
    reading your note, it appears that all you need is for the nameservice
    to
    advertise and listen on multiple ports and that works fine. I justtested
    it again for sanity sake and it worked. I ran my test on NT using
    Forte
    3G2.
    Sean
    -----Original Message-----
    From: [email protected]
    [<a href="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of John Jamison
    Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 1998 4:51 PM
    To: Venkat Kodumudi
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: Re: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the samemachine
    Venkat,
    Technically yes this is possible, though not in Forte. A nameserver
    can
    only listen on one port.
    To implement this scheme you will have to write a proxy service (insome
    language
    including perhaps forte) which listens on the well-known port on the
    second card, reads requests, then forwards them to the realnameservice
    (wkp on the first card), and forwards replies back. This is not
    trivial, but some firewall toolkit vendors supply stub code to write
    application specific proxies.
    -J
    Venkat Kodumudi wrote:
    Folks,
    Here is what we would like to do:
    We want to have 2 network cards on a unix box - which means I have
    2
    ip
    addresses, and the connection between the two is the unix box and
    only
    the
    unix box. I have a pc connected to the 2nd network card and I want
    it
    to
    connect to the nameserver that is listening on a well known port
    on
    the
    first network card. We don't want to turn IP forwarding between
    the
    two
    cards. We want Forte to address both cards to talk to clients, in
    one
    environment.
    Can this be done? If so how?
    Thanks in advance.
    Venkat Kodumudi
    Price Waterhouse LLP
    Internet: [email protected]
    Internet2: [email protected]
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive<URL:<a href=
    "http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
    >>>>
    John Jamison [email protected]
    Vice President and Chief Technology Officer
    Sage IT Partners, Inc.
    Voice: 415 392-7243 x 306
    Fax: 415 391-3899
    Internet Enabled Business Change
    <a href=
    "http://www.sageit.com">http://www.sageit.com</a>
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
    "http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>

    Hello Venkat,
    I probably should have mentioned this before. Your are correct. Forte is
    doing a host lookup if you are providing a name for example machine1:5000.
    You can bypass the host lookup by using the actual ip dot address instead
    for example 255.255.255.255:5000. This way you are taking the name service
    out od the picture and Forte will use the address provided.
    Sean
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Venkat Kodumudi [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 9:27 AM
    To: 'Sean Brown'
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same machine
    My requirement is that my second card serves as best case performance
    testing piece. This eliminates the network completely. We went one step
    ahead and created a new enviromnent for the second card. Whatever I do, the
    nodemgr is returning back the IP address of the first card, even though my
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS does not have the first card in the picture any where.
    I think Forte is doing a host look up and returning the first IP address it
    finds, as opposed to returning the IP address specified in the environment
    variable FORTE_NS_ADDRESS. Is there a way to trick it?
    Venkat Kodumudi
    Price Waterhouse LLP
    Internet: [email protected]
    Internet2: [email protected]
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Sean Brown [SMTP:[email protected]]
    Sent: Thursday, June 18, 1998 9:54 AM
    To: Venkat Kodumudi
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same
    machine
    OK, you ran into one of the issues. That is, if both addresses are known
    to
    the client that is trying to contact the partition it will always use the
    first address in FORTE_LOCATIONS. This is because FORTE_LOCATIONS was
    designed more as a failover mechanism. So it will always try the first
    address in the list and if it succeeds, there is no reason to move on to
    the
    second.
    Now, the second issue is that there is currently a problem with the client
    failover to the secondary address in FORTE_LOCATIONS. If the first entry
    fails it is supposed to retry on the second entry. Instead, it retries
    the
    first entry again. I know that Forte knows about this but I do not have a
    bug number on it.
    With that said, lets look at a possible solution for you. If the real
    objective here is to have a back up network card available for fail over
    on
    the same machine, or use one card to advertise outside your firewall and
    one
    to use inside, then you will have to contact Forte to determine when the
    failover problem will be fixed. But, if the objective is to load balance
    across the network cards you could have the environment manager listen on
    both ports and then alternate your server partitions across both cards.
    For
    example:
    set FORTE_NS_ADDRESS=card1:5000;card2:5000 and then start up the
    environment
    manager
    set FORTE_LOCATIONS=card1:0 (the 0 in the port causes the OS to pick a
    port)
    and start partition one
    set FORTE_LOCATIONS=card2:0 and start partition two
    and so on....
    In this scenario the environment manager will be listening on both cards
    but
    each server will be listening on only one of the two cards. So if a
    request
    comes in for partition1 it will go through card one and if it is for
    partition two it will go through card two. You could assign your
    partitions
    to cards based on expected load.
    Well, I am done. I hope this helps!
    Sean
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Venkat Kodumudi [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent: Thursday, June 18, 1998 8:06 AM
    To: 'Sean Brown'; 'John Jamison'
    Cc: [email protected]; Jose Suriol
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same machine
    Sean,
    Thanks for your reply. I tried the approach. I was not very specific in
    my
    question. I do need the ability for server applications to listen and
    server
    on both the network cards.
    I was succesfully able to make the nodemgr listen on both the cards and
    actually serve requests coming in from both the cards. But, following your
    advise, I took a cautious step with FORTE_LOCATIONS. Here is what I
    noticed.
    I have an application that has 6 partitions in total. I used
    FORTE_LOCATION
    to make it listen on 1. Both the cards. 2. Swapped the IP addresses for
    both
    cards for this application. 3. One card that I want it to listen on. I
    tried
    all approaches by exporting the locations variable for just this
    application. The nodemgr recieves a request from this pc connected on the
    second card to talk to one of the partitions. The node mgr responds with a
    proxy - with the ip address and socket number of the first card. The
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS variable looks like this:
    IP1:5002;IP2:5002.
    Is it possible atall to resolve my problem, without having a seperate
    environment?
    Thanks
    Venkat Kodumudi
    Price Waterhouse LLP
    Internet: [email protected]
    Internet2: [email protected]
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Sean Brown [SMTP:[email protected]]
    Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 1998 10:42 AM
    To: 'John Jamison'; Venkat Kodumudi
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same
    machine
    Venkat,
    Actually, it is possible for Forte to listen on more than one IP andport
    combination. The first reply to your message was correct. If you setthe
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS to contain multiple entries before starting the name
    service, it will advertise on both. For Forte servers you use the
    FORTE_LOCATIONS env variable to get it to advertise on multiple ip:port
    combinations.
    We were doing something very similar with another customer I was at toget
    around a firewall. I will warn you that there are some issues with
    FORTE_LOCATIONS that may keep that portion from working. However, from
    reading your note, it appears that all you need is for the name serviceto
    advertise and listen on multiple ports and that works fine. I justtested
    it again for sanity sake and it worked. I ran my test on NT using Forte
    3G2.
    Sean
    -----Original Message-----
    From: [email protected]
    [<a href="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of John Jamison
    Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 1998 4:51 PM
    To: Venkat Kodumudi
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: Re: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same machine
    Venkat,
    Technically yes this is possible, though not in Forte. A name server
    can
    only listen on one port.
    To implement this scheme you will have to write a proxy service (in some
    language
    including perhaps forte) which listens on the well-known port on the
    second card, reads requests, then forwards them to the real nameservice
    (wkp on the first card), and forwards replies back. This is not
    trivial, but some firewall toolkit vendors supply stub code to write
    application specific proxies.
    -J
    Venkat Kodumudi wrote:
    Folks,
    Here is what we would like to do:
    We want to have 2 network cards on a unix box - which means I have 2ip
    addresses, and the connection between the two is the unix box and onlythe
    unix box. I have a pc connected to the 2nd network card and I want it
    to
    connect to the nameserver that is listening on a well known port onthe
    first network card. We don't want to turn IP forwarding between thetwo
    cards. We want Forte to address both cards to talk to clients, in one
    environment.
    Can this be done? If so how?
    Thanks in advance.
    Venkat Kodumudi
    Price Waterhouse LLP
    Internet: [email protected]
    Internet2: [email protected]
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive<URL:<a href=
    "http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
    >>
    John Jamison [email protected]
    Vice President and Chief Technology Officer
    Sage IT Partners, Inc.
    Voice: 415 392-7243 x 306
    Fax: 415 391-3899
    Internet Enabled Business Change
    <a href="http://www.sageit.com">http://www.sageit.com</a>
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
    "http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>

  • Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the samemachine

    Folks,
    Here is what we would like to do:
    We want to have 2 network cards on a unix box - which means I have 2 ip
    addresses, and the connection between the two is the unix box and only the
    unix box. I have a pc connected to the 2nd network card and I want it to
    connect to the nameserver that is listening on a well known port on the
    first network card. We don't want to turn IP forwarding between the two
    cards. We want Forte to address both cards to talk to clients, in one
    environment.
    Can this be done? If so how?
    Thanks in advance.
    Venkat Kodumudi
    Price Waterhouse LLP
    Internet: [email protected]
    Internet2: [email protected]
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

    Hmmmm? That is a little odd! Let me rehash what I think you are saying.
    You now have two environments each with their own name service with
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS set to a different IP:Port combination. For example you
    are doing the steps:
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS=255.255.255.1:5000
    start the nodemgr for env 1
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS=255.255.255.2:5000
    start the nodemgr for env 2
    Now when you start a client you are always getting the address for env 1
    back from the nodemgr. I assume you actually mean the name service? Or, do
    you mean you are always connecting to the nodemgr & name service for env 1?
    If the first scenario is the case and you are connecting to the nodemgr for
    env 2 but getting back IP's for services listening on the card for env 1 I
    would ask you what you are setting the FORTE_LOCATIONS value to before you
    start each service. If you are not setting it or are using the host name it
    will register using the IP for the primary network card associated with the
    machine name and I am again assuming that this is env 1. You need to set
    the FORTE_LOCATIONS variable to 255.255.255.2:0 (based on the steps above)
    before starting your services.
    If the second scenario is the case I would have you check what the
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS is set to before you start up the client. Once again it
    must be the IP:Port combination not host:port combination if you want to get
    anything other than the primary card.
    I would also suggest that you do the following. After everything is up and
    running execute the following commands:
    escript -fns "ip for env1":port
    findsub nameservice
    showpart
    What you should see is everything currently registered under the name
    service. It will have the name and any "locations" (IP and port) that it is
    registered as listening on. I would look for the nodemgr and see where it
    has advertised itself. I would then look for any services you expect to be
    registered there and also verify where the have advertised themselves. If
    there are multiple locations listed for any one service, the client will use
    the first one in the list.
    Do the same for env 2.
    Sean
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Venkat Kodumudi [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 9:57 AM
    To: 'Sean Brown'
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same machine
    I am giving the actual IP address. and not the host name. That is why I
    don't understand what is going on.
    Venkat Kodumudi
    Price Waterhouse LLP
    Internet: [email protected]
    Internet2: [email protected]
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Sean Brown [SMTP:[email protected]]
    Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 10:53 AM
    To: Venkat Kodumudi; 'Sean Brown'
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same
    machine
    Hello Venkat,
    I probably should have mentioned this before. Your are correct. Forte is
    doing a host lookup if you are providing a name for example machine1:5000.
    You can bypass the host lookup by using the actual ip dot address instead
    for example 255.255.255.255:5000. This way you are taking the name
    service
    out od the picture and Forte will use the address provided.
    Sean
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Venkat Kodumudi [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 9:27 AM
    To: 'Sean Brown'
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same machine
    My requirement is that my second card serves as best case performance
    testing piece. This eliminates the network completely. We went one step
    ahead and created a new enviromnent for the second card. Whatever I do,
    the
    nodemgr is returning back the IP address of the first card, even though my
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS does not have the first card in the picture any where.
    I think Forte is doing a host look up and returning the first IP address
    it
    finds, as opposed to returning the IP address specified in the environment
    variable FORTE_NS_ADDRESS. Is there a way to trick it?
    Venkat Kodumudi
    Price Waterhouse LLP
    Internet: [email protected]
    Internet2: [email protected]
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Sean Brown [SMTP:[email protected]]
    Sent: Thursday, June 18, 1998 9:54 AM
    To: Venkat Kodumudi
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same
    machine
    OK, you ran into one of the issues. That is, if both addresses areknown
    to
    the client that is trying to contact the partition it will always usethe
    first address in FORTE_LOCATIONS. This is because FORTE_LOCATIONS was
    designed more as a failover mechanism. So it will always try the first
    address in the list and if it succeeds, there is no reason to move on to
    the
    second.
    Now, the second issue is that there is currently a problem with theclient
    failover to the secondary address in FORTE_LOCATIONS. If the firstentry
    fails it is supposed to retry on the second entry. Instead, it retries
    the
    first entry again. I know that Forte knows about this but I do not havea
    bug number on it.
    With that said, lets look at a possible solution for you. If the real
    objective here is to have a back up network card available for fail over
    on
    the same machine, or use one card to advertise outside your firewall and
    one
    to use inside, then you will have to contact Forte to determine when the
    failover problem will be fixed. But, if the objective is to loadbalance
    across the network cards you could have the environment manager listenon
    both ports and then alternate your server partitions across both cards.
    For
    example:
    set FORTE_NS_ADDRESS=card1:5000;card2:5000 and then start up the
    environment
    manager
    set FORTE_LOCATIONS=card1:0 (the 0 in the port causes the OS to pick a
    port)
    and start partition one
    set FORTE_LOCATIONS=card2:0 and start partition two
    and so on....
    In this scenario the environment manager will be listening on both cards
    but
    each server will be listening on only one of the two cards. So if a
    request
    comes in for partition1 it will go through card one and if it is for
    partition two it will go through card two. You could assign your
    partitions
    to cards based on expected load.
    Well, I am done. I hope this helps!
    Sean
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Venkat Kodumudi [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent: Thursday, June 18, 1998 8:06 AM
    To: 'Sean Brown'; 'John Jamison'
    Cc: [email protected]; Jose Suriol
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same machine
    Sean,
    Thanks for your reply. I tried the approach. I was not very specific in
    my
    question. I do need the ability for server applications to listen and
    server
    on both the network cards.
    I was succesfully able to make the nodemgr listen on both the cards and
    actually serve requests coming in from both the cards. But, followingyour
    advise, I took a cautious step with FORTE_LOCATIONS. Here is what I
    noticed.
    I have an application that has 6 partitions in total. I used
    FORTE_LOCATION
    to make it listen on 1. Both the cards. 2. Swapped the IP addresses for
    both
    cards for this application. 3. One card that I want it to listen on. I
    tried
    all approaches by exporting the locations variable for just this
    application. The nodemgr recieves a request from this pc connected onthe
    second card to talk to one of the partitions. The node mgr responds witha
    proxy - with the ip address and socket number of the first card. The
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS variable looks like this:
    IP1:5002;IP2:5002.
    Is it possible atall to resolve my problem, without having a seperate
    environment?
    Thanks
    Venkat Kodumudi
    Price Waterhouse LLP
    Internet: [email protected]
    Internet2: [email protected]
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Sean Brown [SMTP:[email protected]]
    Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 1998 10:42 AM
    To: 'John Jamison'; Venkat Kodumudi
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same
    machine
    Venkat,
    Actually, it is possible for Forte to listen on more than one IP andport
    combination. The first reply to your message was correct. If you setthe
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS to contain multiple entries before starting the name
    service, it will advertise on both. For Forte servers you use the
    FORTE_LOCATIONS env variable to get it to advertise on multiple
    ip:port
    combinations.
    We were doing something very similar with another customer I was at toget
    around a firewall. I will warn you that there are some issues with
    FORTE_LOCATIONS that may keep that portion from working. However,
    from
    reading your note, it appears that all you need is for the nameservice
    to
    advertise and listen on multiple ports and that works fine. I justtested
    it again for sanity sake and it worked. I ran my test on NT using
    Forte
    3G2.
    Sean
    -----Original Message-----
    From: [email protected]
    [<a href="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of John Jamison
    Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 1998 4:51 PM
    To: Venkat Kodumudi
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: Re: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the samemachine
    Venkat,
    Technically yes this is possible, though not in Forte. A nameserver
    can
    only listen on one port.
    To implement this scheme you will have to write a proxy service (insome
    language
    including perhaps forte) which listens on the well-known port on the
    second card, reads requests, then forwards them to the realnameservice
    (wkp on the first card), and forwards replies back. This is not
    trivial, but some firewall toolkit vendors supply stub code to write
    application specific proxies.
    -J
    Venkat Kodumudi wrote:
    Folks,
    Here is what we would like to do:
    We want to have 2 network cards on a unix box - which means I have 2
    ip
    addresses, and the connection between the two is the unix box and
    only
    the
    unix box. I have a pc connected to the 2nd network card and I want
    it
    to
    connect to the nameserver that is listening on a well known port onthe
    first network card. We don't want to turn IP forwarding between thetwo
    cards. We want Forte to address both cards to talk to clients, in
    one
    environment.
    Can this be done? If so how?
    Thanks in advance.
    Venkat Kodumudi
    Price Waterhouse LLP
    Internet: [email protected]
    Internet2: [email protected]
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive<URL:<a href=
    "http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
    >>>
    John Jamison [email protected]
    Vice President and Chief Technology Officer
    Sage IT Partners, Inc.
    Voice: 415 392-7243 x 306
    Fax: 415 391-3899
    Internet Enabled Business Change
    <a href=
    "http://www.sageit.com">http://www.sageit.com</a>
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
    "http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>

  • Is there a way to add Adobe Reader directly to my website for legal documents?

    Is there a way to add Adobe Reader directly to my website for legal documents? It is on Wordpress. [link removed by moderator]

    Technically, you CAN embed a pdf so that it opens within the page. Use <embed src="http://yoursite.com/the.pdf" width="500" height="375">
    But you'll want to test it with all browsers (assuming this is something you are trying to accomplish).

  • Do I need to have "Time Machine" running in the background all the time or can I turn it off and on say once a week?

    Do I need to have "Time Machine" running in the background all the time or can I turn it off and on say, once a week?

    Robert Kempner wrote:
    Do I need to have "Time Machine" running in the background all the time ...
    It is how it is designed to be used. How Time Machine Works its Magic
    Robert Kempner wrote:
    ... can I turn it off and on say, once a week?
    Why..?
    Perhaps TM is not for you... See Time Machine vs. Clones and Archives
    More Info here >  http://www.reedcorner.net/guides/backups/ch2.php

  • I have a new iTunes acct for my 10year old . she was playing one of the games and did not know it was charging my Cc and grandmas CC for her game. Is there a way to have these amt adj off the cards. I have made sure my CC info is not in the system now

    My 10 year old daughter downloaded a free game on her i Pod touch. When playing the game she did not know she was ordering apps
    is there a way to have my cc and her grandma cc refunded these charges. I thought my acct was set up to not keep our CC # on file.
    Please help.

    There are no refunds.
    You can set restirctions so that it does not allow in app purchases.
    You can try asking itunes support for an exception and see how it goes.
    Click "Support" at the top of this page, then click the link under "Contact Us"

  • Is there a way to have a Numbers spreadsheet show the row numbers on ipad?

    I am have a spreadsheet I am using for keeping count of the current people registered for an event.
    If there a way to have one of the columns automatically show the row numbers so I can easily see the amount of people confirmed for the event without having to manually count them? Also, I will be adding and deleting lines and need Numbers to automatically show the row numbers without me having to change it.
    Thanks,
    Mike

    I found it out:
    inserted a new column A
    a --
    In A1 type 1
    in A2 type 2
    select the pair A1:A2
    drag the circular handle from the bottom right of A2 thru the very bottom of the column.
    b --
    in A1 type =ROW()
    select the cell A1
    drag the circular handle from the bottom right of A1 thru the very bottom of the column.

  • Is there a way to install Adobe Acrobat XI Standard for Windows on Mac?

    Dear Acrobat Support Team!
    I bought a Fujitsu Scanner with Adobe XI Standard.
    Unfortunately, the software is only for PC and I am a Mac user. Is there a way for me to use this software or serial key on my  Mac?
    Thank you very much, ShuretzZ

    Only by running Windows (Boot Camp or Parallels Desktop). You'd also have to buy a copy of Windows 7 or Windows 8.

  • Is there a way to force Adobe Reader to grab the sign on ID for a digital stamp?

    I work for a state Agency and we want to use digital stamps as our signatures on our internal documents. I have created the form in LiveCycle and I know that in Adobe Reader by default the stamp will use the person's sign on ID for the stamp and then the person adds their name and other information.
    However, if the person right clicks the stamp, and edits the Identity and puts in another sign on ID number, such as their supervisor's and stamps the document, there is no way to tell that both of those stamps, with different sign on IDs and names, were created by the same person.
    If there is a script I can enter in LiveCycle, that when the form is opened in Adobe Reader, that would lock the Identity field of a stamp created in Adobe Reader from allowing a change to the sign on ID, then that would solve our problem and maybe the problem for other state agencies wanting to follow suit.
    The digital signatures are even worse. I made one in my name, my supervisor's name and my dog's name, attached them all to a document, validated all the signatures and they look absolutely authentic. Why would Adobe make digital signatures like that? If we could just find some evidence within the data showing that all the signatures were applied by the same person or on the same computer, then we could use them. But the stamps at least grab that unique sign on number that we use and applies it to the stamp if the user doesn't alter it.
    I'm on a time crunch as we hoped to launch this after the first of the year but our attorneys are saying, "uh, uh" until something can be done to prevent fraud. We have over 3,000 people in our agency so EchoSign would be out of the question.
    I'd appreciate any suggestions.

    You will not get what you need using stamps, especially if you ever want to use dynamic XFA forms.
    The digital signatures that were signed with a self-signed digital ID won't fully validate unless the user chooses to trust the corresponding digital certificate first. You should only trust a digital certificate if you trust its source. The problem is using self-signed IDs will be difficult to use on the scale you're talking about.
    Digital signatures are the best approach for your needs. They can provide both nonrepudiation of document origin as well as document integrity. You just have to figure out how to implement a solution you can afford.
    You agency can become its own certificate authority and issue certificates to its employees. You'd just have to find a way to implement and manage such a system.

  • Is there some way of getting adobe to work without having to download a document first, then adobe will show the pages.

    Hello,
    I am trying to find out what I can do, to get adobe to open up a pdf file so that I can read all pages, without having to download the document first. I get the first page only; then I download and have access to all pages. Then I delete. Seems like such a long process. Is there another way? Do I need to download a different adobe?
    Thanks for your help.

    How are you seeing your document on iCloud from your laptop? Web browser, or OS X Pages open dialog?
    If you have MS Word or .pages formatted files parked on iCloud, the web interface will not permit their download as PDF, and in fact, PDF is an inactive option in that download menu for these word processing files. There is no copy facility available, but duplicate functionality exists from the iWork category within the iCloud web presence.
    If you have Pages v4.2 or later installed on your (assumption: Mac) laptop, launch Pages and in the open file dialog, select iCloud on the dialog toolbar. Now, press and hold the option key as you drag and drop a copy of our document from iCloud to your desktop. The reverse works also.
    See if you can open that document on your laptop now.

  • When I mark a mail in the junk folder as 'not junk', is there a way to have it automatically move to the inbox?

    Apple Mail keeps putting good messages into the Junk folder. I mark them as 'not junk', but then they just sit there. It is really tedious to have to move them back to the inbox, and change the colour back to black. Is there any way to do this automatically?
    I originally placed this question on the Snow Leopard group, but since then I have updated to Lion. I was hoping that Lion would have provided a solution, but it seems not. In the Snow Leopard group, somebody posted a script which apparently works in Snow Leopard, but I have no idea if it works in Lion, as there doesn't seem to be any way to load scripts.
    This is the script, anyway.
    It was given to me by <Bernard Hills> but I don't know who wrote it.

    OK, I've discovered how to access the library.
    It's here: http://techheavy.com/2011/07/access-the-user-library-folder-in-lion/
    But I don't really want to try that script in case it screws something up. I know zero about scripting.

Maybe you are looking for