Is there a workaround to CSCtn42049 user groups not deleted on topology?

My customer has 200 devices and the topology view is very dificult to visualize.
I tried using user defined groups, but after deleting them to start over they keep on the topology.
It´s probably the CSCtn42049 bug.
Is there a way to mannualy clear the topology and get rid of that deleted groups from topology?
Besides that on the Level 2 map I see several Ethernet segments that causes the links not shown
properly as they should. All links have CDP activated.
Is there a procedure to troublesoot and correct the topology in order to have the links shown direct from one device to the other like most
of them are shown?

The 2012 (no camera on back) was the one that has Tegra 3.
The old flash 11.1 should work on Nexus 7 2013 if it has Android 4.x, however with Android 5.0 or Lollipop I am not sure.

Similar Messages

After installing Mountain Lion, why is there Yahoo access for one user but not another?--both are administrators.

After installing Mountain Lion, why is there Yahoo access for one user but not another?--both are administrators.

We've had several instances where we have had to run chkdsk on arrays with over 1m files. Average completion time is approximately 72 hours. The maximum downtime window they have available is the 64 hour weekend window. File sizes and number of files were
much smaller then than they are now.
The idea, in theory, was to use VHDs to compartmentalize the data into smaller volumes which could be more easily managed. It would also improve performance when transferring these compartments of data as they would use sequential read/write rather than
fragmented/random. This idea was never fleshed out in entirety, they don't split data up into little containers, but simply into big ones per project. Hence the 11m files in one container that I am currently trying to diagnose.
Some other important facts: The VHD in question is mounted in B:/project/ as this server also allows remote workers to log in, but they are restricted to see only data in E:. Disks A-D are hidden via group policy.
Update: icacls is failing on a large number of files within this dataset. I counted the path characters to ensure it wasn't the 255 character limit I was encountering and verified that the paths being blocked are only about 150 characters long. Once it finishes,
I'll have to try taking ownership and then re-running it. At this point I still have no idea how long to expect. I'm running out of time as the environment will be in use again at 9AM tomorrow morning.

Is there a way to pull User, Group , Other permissions of a file

I wanted to know whether Java provides any API to pull up each and every permission associated with a file.
For example: In Unix, a file has 3 sets of permissions as shown below:
<UserPermissions><GroupPermissions><Others'Permissions>
Example: -rwxrwxrwx
r - for read
w - for write
x - for execute
There are some methods provided in java.io.File, such as canRead() and canWrite(), which help in telling whether a file is readable or writable. But I did not find any API which tells whether a perticular user has read/write/execute permission or not. Also, I presume the canRead(),canWrite() methods pull up the permissions pertaining to the owner of the file, but not for the group and others part of a Unix File's permissions.
Is there a way to pull up the read/write/executable permissions for all the 3 catergories namely, UserPermissions, GroupPermissions and Others'Permissions.
I appreciate your note on this and appreciate your time too.

In the java.io.File class, there's methods canRead() and canWrite().
They will test the read/write permissions of the Unix user you are running your Java program with.
They will not return a list of user names, user groups etc though.
You'd have to get the permissions through some platform specific method, eg. via JNI.
regards,
Owen

Is there a way to disable user groups?

Just curious if there is a way to disable user groups in Essbase rather than the indevidual users?Thanks!

I do not think there is a way to disbale the group - like a check box function (but that would be a ncie feature)- but you can consider the group "disabled" if you change the App/Db access of that group to nothing - you would just have to change the highest level of what you have defined for the group - so for instance change all of the APPS from "Access Database" to "None"...

LDAP user groups not visible for configuring a Group Portal

Hi,
We have created a Custom Security Realm(myRealm) on WebLogic 7.0 SP2 in which
I've added the Novell LDAP Authentication provider as the authentication provider
and then set "myRealm" as the default realm for the domain. I am able to start
the WLS server instance and login to portalAppTools with the "administrator" account.
We would like to configure a Group Portal. In Portal Administration interfaces,
when I click on Group Administartion, I am unable to see any of my external LDAP
groups. I know that we cannot create/delete users or groups in the external LDAP
repository thru the Admin UI but the documentation says that I should be able
to view the users/groups in the Admin UI. Authentication against the external
LDAP repository works fine. Can anybody suggest the reason why we are unable to
view any of the Users or Groups in our external LDAP repository thru the User
Administration interfactes.
Appreciate any feedback.
Thanks
Vikram

Hi Jim,
I've configured a default LDAP V2 Compatibility Realm by modifying the Config.xml
file. I was able to restart Weblogic and see the LDAP Groups and Users thru the
WLS console. In our project we've a unique requirement wherein all Application
Groups and User Accounts would be stored in an LDAP repository and all BEA SERVICE
level accounts and groups are stored in a Database (groups like AdminEligible,
Administrators etc.). We need to be able to look at the groups in both the Database
and LDAP repositories in order to administer and configure a Group Portal. On
the outset it looks like we will not be able to do what we want to with the current
portal framework. Please suggest if there are any alternatives in order to implement
this solution. I am sure there are lot of other Clients who cannot create groups
like Administrators, AdminEligible etc in their LDAP repositories and will be
forced to think of alternatives.
I would appreciate if you can reply back at your earliest convenience.
Thanks
Vikram
Jim Litton <replyto@newsgroup> wrote:
The Weblogic 7.0 Authentication Providers (new JAAS Framework) is not
supported with Portal 7.0. You will need to configure the Compatibility
Security CustomRealm for Novell to try to get Portal working.
see defaultLDAPRealmForNovellDirectoryServices at
http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs61/adminguide/cnfgsec.html#1083149
In addition, remember to test functionality through the Weblogic
Console. If you can see groups and users there okay it is very likely
that Portal will operate.
-- Jim
Vikram wrote:
Hi,
We have created a Custom Security Realm(myRealm) on WebLogic 7.0 SP2in which
I've added the Novell LDAP Authentication provider as the authenticationprovider
and then set "myRealm" as the default realm for the domain. I am ableto start
the WLS server instance and login to portalAppTools with the "administrator"account.
We would like to configure a Group Portal. In Portal Administrationinterfaces,
when I click on Group Administartion, I am unable to see any of myexternal LDAP
groups. I know that we cannot create/delete users or groups in theexternal LDAP
repository thru the Admin UI but the documentation says that I shouldbe able
to view the users/groups in the Admin UI. Authentication against theexternal
LDAP repository works fine. Can anybody suggest the reason why we areunable to
view any of the Users or Groups in our external LDAP repository thruthe User
Administration interfactes.
Appreciate any feedback.
Thanks
Vikram

Users & Groups not in Get Info options

When opening a Get Info window to change Sharing & Permissions, adding a new entry to the list shows maybe 4 options when the OS has dozens of users & groups. Why are standard options like "staff" not showing up?

I need to enable a folder to be read/write by "staff" for a specific application I am using, and the new GUI isn't allowing me to do that
What app is it? Why does it require you to do this? What folder is it that you want to modify? What are you trying to achieve? More then likely there is a better way to do it, or may not be needed in the first place.
Lasso web application. In order to execute file editing commands (read txt files, write them, manipulate uploads, etc), the target file/folder must have, under the POSIX rules of 10.4, either an owner of "lasso" (a user created by the software), or the group of "staff."
In order to make the source code files themselves easy to administer on the server, I typically have always left owner as the main user I log into the system with, and set group to staff. This is the most convenient configuration for ≤ 10.4 systems.
In 10.5, after copying files to servers I'm seeing a mixture in the Get Info ACL of {user owner}, admin, and everyone in some systems, and {user owner}, staff, and everyone in other systems. Haven't tracked down why the difference (I suspect preservation of permissions somehow during the copy). Even when staff is in the ACL, it's not a part of the options the GUI presents.
Anyway, I was trying to take advantage of the ACL in allowing two otherwise separate users/groups to have some shared access, and needed "staff" as a group for these files.
I didn't just use the chgrp command as I don't yet know the consequence of using POSIX commands on what I want to be ACL controls. So, am trying to do some digging into all that now. I was just thrown by the lack of visibility of all the usual user & groups options I am used to seeing in ≤ 10.4.

Message thrown as User group not created

Hi,
When the User tries to access a Transaction Code which is a (Query created from table BSEG) he gets a message that User Group has not yet been created, where as the User Group has been created and can be seen.
We checked the SU53 screen after accessing this transaction and all checks were successful.
Please provide ur suggestions.
Regards,
Priya

Just check if the query is attached is to a User Group or not .
GOTO to SQ02 find the infoset for the query
goto to Environment->User Group .
Please check this and reward if useful.

New user creation in AE- user group not getting assigned

Hi All,
Here is a typical case, wherein when we create a new user with AE for the production system, the user gets created and the roles are also assigned but the user group is not getting assigned. The user group is being fetched from a table from the backend and all that is working fine. Infact in order to test the configurations we even created a new user in the production instance of AE giving the development system as the target system for user creation and in this case the user was successfully created and the user group is also assigned. The problem is arising only when the target system is production system.
Connectors are all working fine, but we are unable to think of a reason. Can somebody help us on this?

Hi Vani,
If you are provisioning the user group using user defaults, check that production system is selected in the user defaults configured. Configuration -> user defaults. You can define any user default system, but for perticuticular user defaults that is applicable define all the systems, in which you want user defaults to be provisioned.
Kind Regards,
Srinivasan

Batch Risk Analysis in Full Sync mode with special user groups not working

Dear All,
we start Batch Risk Analyse Job in Full Sync with special User groups (use Range). In the Joblog I can see, that he selecet lesser users as in jobs before. But after all is finished (also managment job) when I go in Informer, he shows me also this user groups I have no analysed in Backgroudjob... Also he shows me in the detailed anlayse the date from a run before.. And we have deactivated some Risk - these are still in the analysis.
Have some one a information for me what here is wrong..
Best Regards
Gabriele Herr

to old..

Users/groups not visible in WGM after migration. (UIDs lower than 500)

I have migrated from a 10.5 to a 10.6 server.
Some of my user & groups are not visible in the WGM. However, the user can login to the system.
I discovered that if I check Workgroup Manager > View > Show System Records, that I can see the missing users and groups. The users and groups all of UID/GID's from 100 to 130.
All of the affected users & groups were created many versions ago, probably Mac OS X 10.1 Server. The accounts that are visible are newer and have UID's starting in either at 501 or 1025. So it looks like overtime OS X server has changed what ID's are used for system vs. users.
What is the proper way to solve this problem? The WGM will let me to manually change the UID/GID, but I am worried about doing this will not change file ownerships.
Thansk!

You are correct, the ACL and or POSIX permissions will not update if you just change the UID of the group or user account. You will need to add the new UID to the directories in question. And be sure to propagate the permissions.
I would take one each group and user account and use it as a test case to discover how much is involved. Document what steps are needed to make the changes and then do them in bits and pieces.

BPC 7.5 - Domain User Group Not Work - Configuration Server Manager

Hi Guys,
I install BPC 7.5 from NW. From the PC client only work ok with the same user OWNER the BPC .NET. In Server Manger -> Option
-> Define Systems User Group, add the follow data:
- System user group name= Domain Users
- Domain Type=Active Directory
- Domain Name = BAIRES
Is correct the Syntax? or need use the form OU=xxxx?
Thanks.

Ok, thanks, and So I have other problem. I need Add User from different Domains, How configure this?
Tks

User should not delete Sales orders in CRM before May 2014.

Hi,
We have requirement in CRM i.e. user cannot delete Sales orders before may 2014 in SAP CRM.
Recently we have implemented Credit Check management in ECC (Cash n Carry Process especially for some customers)
Normally we do create orders in CRM it should be replicated to ECC, based on FD32 credit value in ECC, CRM order should give credit check massage.
go through the below notes n help us where to change BADI in CRM, plz.
We like to add a scenario where prior to April’14 period, user can not cancel/delete any order in CRM, so that the order cancellation data will not flow to SAP and below problem can be resolved.
While checking the credit Exposure of the INDL Customers, we found in some cases, user has deleted few old orders in CRM which creates a open sales order value as Negative in SAP System. Due to this for a customer, if there is ZERO credit limit, ZERO outstanding, ZERO liability, Credit Exposure is become Negative as open order value is there. In CRM order is being raised and credit block is not appearing if the order amount is below the Credit exposure.
Request you pls maintain the open Sales order value as ZERO for the INC customers (as per attachment list) for those who have a NEGATIVE open sales order value.
For the open Sales order Value which are POSITIVE, keep these as same as these are customer’s actual & current open orders.
NOTE: If user delete before may 2014 sales orders, all the deleted order values will be added to FD32 (Credit exposure -Negative),then user can able to raise sales orders for that value also.(It cannot be happened)
Regards,
JK

Hello JK,
I guess you can play around with the standard. You need to create a separate PFCG Role which only contains sales order related authorization object. Basically removing sales order related authorization object from the main primary PFCG role. And then controlling the secondary PFCG Role which only have sales order object. Controlling sales order PFCG role with validity period. Below is the screen shot of the PFCG role where you can maintain the validity period of the PFCG role for the specific user assigned to it.
I hope this solution was helpful for you!
Regards,
Neha Gupta

OIM 11gR2 : User groups not visible on UI

Hello Experts,
I have a requirement in which i need to assign the user provisioned to AD to some group(s) depending upon certain conditions like BU, Location etc. I created a Process Task adapter for the same and am able to successfully assign the users to the desired groups.
But i am able to check for this validity from the Backend only.
Ideally the groups assigned to the user must be visible after following these steps:
*1. Search for a user provisioned to AD.
2. Go the the Accounts tab.
3. Click on the AD account (to which the user has been provisioned)
4. A process form is displayed in the lower half of the webpage which also shows the information regarding the groups assigned to the User. But the groups are not getting displayed.*
Kindly Help.
Edited by: IDM_newbie on Jan 24, 2013 11:24 PM

But sir, the groups are listed under the Accounts tab. Is there any schedule job provided by OIM 11gR2 which results in the display of Groups assigned to the user as well under the Accounts tab ?
Edited by: IDM_newbie on Jan 25, 2013 1:51 AM

SCCM Compliance Targeted to User Group Not Working

Due to the limitation in SCCM on working directly with DLs, I have found a work around that is posted in following blog
http://myitforum.com/myitforumwp/2012/02/11/collection-based-on-distribution-lists-2/
I tried to take this approach to deploy a compliance base line setting but it does not seem like doing anything. Its been nearly 2 days but the users in DL are not getting any settings. The DCM baseline is targeted to an AD security group that has DL as
its member.
Does anyone know if its never going to work or its now just waiting game? I have been waiting over 24 hours and logged on and off several times with user account but with no luck.

** Resolved **
I used following query which populated collection with users from desired DL and finally users got their DCM policy.
select SMS_R_USER.ResourceID,SMS_R_USER.ResourceType,SMS_R_USER.Name,SMS_R_USER.UniqueUserName,SMS_R_USER.WindowsNTDomain from SMS_R_User where SMS_R_User.UserGroupName like "%ConfigMgr_Compliance%"
Note: the DL is member of ConfigMgr_Compliance Security group.

Is there a workaround to make my PowerBook not spit out dvds?

powerbook g4 Mac OS X (10.4.8)
Since I updated to OSX10.4.8 recently my reader spits out dvds I have burned on my external Lacie burner using Toast 6.1.1 Titanium. This never used to happen. I've read previous posts on this topic but nothing suggested there helps.
Is this a deliberate attempt on the part of Apple to control dvd burning? I am using material that does not have security on it for demo reel purposes only.
Older dvds that I burned prior to the update are accepted by the machine while new ones are not.
Can anyone please help?

Is it the same question than in this post ?
PSE13 Organizer display (folder vs. album view) - Elements Village

Is there a workaround to CSCtn42049 user groups not deleted on topology?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for