Is there any danger subjecting a WRE54g to below freezing temperatures?

Is there any danger subjecting a WRE54g to below freezing temperatures? I am using the repeater to relay an AP to a guard shack while working. I have the repeater in my car running on a power inverter about 500 feet away. I live in the northeast and winter temperatures can get below zero.

You can check this link and i think it will help you little bit. Check the specification and it might help you.
Message Edited by dibbler on 12-16-2009 05:47 PM

Similar Messages

I want to connect the ipod directly to the car 's speakers without any amplifiers, is there any danger to burn the ipod?

I want to connect the ipod directly to the car 's speakers without any amplifiers, is there any danger to burn the ipod?

No, but it will not work. The iPod does not have an amplifier in it that is powerful enough to drive the speakers in your car.
So, do you have a stereo in the car, either factory fitted or one you have had fitted after it came out of the factory? If you do, check to see if the car's stereo either has a dedicated input for an iPod or an auxilary (aux input) socket.
Some modern cars (for example, my 2006 model Mazda 3) have stereos that can be fitted with iPod connectors. I paid to have one fitted to my Mazda's factory-fitted stereo. So now, I connect my iPod to the car's stereo via a dock connector and I have limited control of the iPod from the car's steering wheel. Some cars have more sophisticted control than mine does.
Alternatively, if the car's stereo has an Aux input socket, you only need to buy a headphone-to-headphone lead and connect from the iPod's headphone socket to the Aux input.
If you don't have either of those options, another method is to use a transmitter. These small radio transmitters are connected into the headphone socket of the iPod and then transmit the audio (like radio) so that you can tune your car's radio to the same frequency as the transmitter. You control the iPod as you do when using headphones. The sound quality will porbably not be as good as the dedicated dock connector method, but it's reasonable.

Hello. I have two version of Office for Mac. 2008 and 2001. I want to delete the 2008 version. If I use the removal tool within the Offie 2008 folder, is there any danger of the 2001 version being removed too. Thanks Dave UK

Hello. I have two version of Office for Mac. 2008 and 2001. I want to delete the 2008 version. If I use the removal tool within the Offie 2008 folder, is there any danger of the 2001 version being removed too. Thanks Dave UK

Do you mean Office 2008 and 2011 or do you really want Office 2001? I think you mean 2011 since Office 2001 wouldn't make much sense.
The Office uninstaller should be able to identify there are two versions and allow you to delete either one or both.

I have ip 3gs and ios 4.1 i want to upgrade it to download latest version of apps ,which ios will be compatible and is there any danger to update ios before i erased all settings and content and i tried to update but it failed .it is working properly

i have ip 3gs and ios 4.1 i want to upgrade it to download latest version of apps ,which ios will be compatible and is there any danger to update ios before i erased all settings and content and i tried to update but it failed .it is working properly but i want to update from itunes.iwill do back up but is there any other thing i will face after updating like it will jut show apple loge and will not work. please answer quickly

An iPhone 3GS is too old to update to the very latest iOS and you will never be able to use apps that are compatible. The phone is just too old now in technology terms and the app makers have all moved on, so it's time to get a new phone.
Ideally, perhaps get an iPhone 4s or if you can afford it, an iPhone 5s or 5c which are the newest models.

Is there any danger in closing your apps completely?

I used to have an android phone and I read were you should just not kill your apps. Is there any danger in closing your apps completely on the iPhone 4s? To do this I hit the home button twice, hold down on one of the apps until it starts bounching and then close them.
Thanks!
Sikorasc

No.
I too came from an Android and the stupid "need" to close apps all the time in fear of battery drain or performance drop.
From what I've read and been told by Apple specialist at Verizon, there's no need.
Its part of the Apple multitasking experience.
The way I read it and had it explained is, the App running freezes in its current state once home button it hit.
You open another App and the previous one is froze in standby. Then you can switch between them and its fast
They call up much quicker. And they don't use battery while frozen.
They don't hurt performance either. I've had every App on my phone open at one point(accidentally) because I was used to Android and I never saw a performance drop.
I also leave them open all day and the battery life is same.
Apple says, if memory get slow, it will look at latest process vs biggest process and decide which to stop if need be.
You can close them if you like, it wont hurt, but its nice to have them open for quick use without the fear of battery drain.
A nice feature coming to Apple.
Heres my battery life
I know some have reported bad usage.....and I believe them. But every one of those Ive read were rectified by either a configuration of push not. etc or just a faulty battery.

Is there any danger in opening an unstructured document in structured Framemaker?

I know that it's not a good idea to open a structured FrameMaker file in the unstructured FrameMaker interface, and that there's a warning about this when you try.
What's come up for us however is whether there's any problem with people using the Structured FrameMaker interface to edit unstructured files.
We have a machine set up for people who are not expert or highly skilled with FrameMaker, and since we have both structured and unstructured documents, the question is whether to leave it set as the structured interface, or the unstructured interface. They're just making small content edits in most cases, for anything more involved they ask me.
So:
If it's set to unstructured:
If they open an unstructured document, all is well.
If they try to open a structured document, they will see the warning. I can tell them what to do if they see it. (This might mean telling them to change to structured, or just to give me that file to edit instead.)
If it's set to structured:
If they open a structured document, no problem.
If they open an unstructured document however -- is there any danger if they edit it that way? Will saving from structured FrameMaker change anything about the file?
In the latter case, opening unstructured in structured Frame, there's no warning, it just opens with a blank structure view window, if they even open that window.
I have to imagine that Adobe separated the two interfaces for a reason, but possibly it has more to do with just not needing all of the resources like XML and DITA menus when you're in unstructured.
I realize that the real answer is not to let people unskilled with FrameMaker use it to edit documents, but this is the way things are for the moment. If it's set to unstructured, they'll have to switch over in order to edit structured files, and then be sure to remember to switch back. Leaving it set as structured in some ways seems the best choice, but only if it won't damage unstructured files that way.
Thanks

timezoned wrote:
I know that it's not a good idea to open a structured FrameMaker file in the unstructured FrameMaker interface, and that there's a warning about this when you try.
What's come up for us however is whether there's any problem with people using the Structured FrameMaker interface to edit unstructured files.
We have a machine set up for people who are not expert or highly skilled with FrameMaker, and since we have both structured and unstructured documents, the question is whether to leave it set as the structured interface, or the unstructured interface. They're just making small content edits in most cases, for anything more involved they ask me.
So:
If it's set to unstructured:
If they open an unstructured document, all is well.
If they try to open a structured document, they will see the warning. I can tell them what to do if they see it. (This might mean telling them to change to structured, or just to give me that file to edit instead.)
If it's set to structured:
If they open a structured document, no problem.
If they open an unstructured document however -- is there any danger if they edit it that way? Will saving from structured FrameMaker change anything about the file?
In the latter case, opening unstructured in structured Frame, there's no warning, it just opens with a blank structure view window, if they even open that window.
I have to imagine that Adobe separated the two interfaces for a reason, but possibly it has more to do with just not needing all of the resources like XML and DITA menus when you're in unstructured.
I realize that the real answer is not to let people unskilled with FrameMaker use it to edit documents, but this is the way things are for the moment. If it's set to unstructured, they'll have to switch over in order to edit structured files, and then be sure to remember to switch back. Leaving it set as structured in some ways seems the best choice, but only if it won't damage unstructured files that way.
Thanks
As Matt notes, the extra structured stuff in the interface may be confusing to users familiar with unstructured FM. However, it will also be confusing when unstructured FM users try to find and use the paragraph and character catalogs, and some other unstructured features that are perfectly usable in structured FM, but are not immediately visible in the structured interface.
One way to improve and simplify the FM environment for users who are able to edit text, but shouldn't be manipulating other tools, is to customize the interface. Search Google for terms like "customizing framemaker" without quotes. Recent FM releases feature the ExtendScript ToolKit, which offers new ways to customize FM, in addition to those in the older methods of modifying the maker.ini and configui files. One option if you follow this path would be to create custom Windows icons that call startup scripts which then call FM. Before the script launches FM, it can copy specified configuration and ini files into the user's environment, so that when FM starts up, it's got just what you design it to have. A simple approach here would be customize unstructured FM's interface to have only the minimum set of menu items and other things you specify, and launch unstructured FM. An icon could be named for the user, like SallyJonesFM, or for the task, like FMUnStrEditing.
I'm sure some folks on the forum have taken an approach like this for their users, and can offer some advice from their vast experience.
HTH
Regards,
Peter
Peter Gold
KnowHow ProServices

Is there any danger in setting the system date/time to a prior date?

We are dealing with some software digital certificate expiration issues. Until the developer gets them fixed, the only way we can use the software is to set the date/time preferences to a date before the certificate expired. Some users are concerned that this will spell catastrophe for their systems because Unix/Linux based things don't like haivng their dates messed with. I maintain that the only things that would be affected are the date/time stamp on files they save while the settings are changed, possibly any iCal events created during the change (which can be overwritten by the user), and that if they use Time Machine the backups might not be dated correctly (and for that reason I've suggested they shut Time Machine off while their date is changed). I just don't believe it will lead to massive system failure. Who is correct?

Yes you will have issus with DHCP leases/Internet and your router if your time and date isn't current.
Offline you can do what you want. Better to get a temporary workaround from the developer to hold you over.

Is there any danger in using Disk Utility

I'm helping a friend who has a (dog slow) G4 iBook running Tiger. Trying to get it limping back into shape. Cleared a lot of junk off the drive, which was essentialy full and ran Disk Utility. Lotsa red ink. Copied the user folder and the applications folder to another drive. Ready to run Disk Utility from the Tiger startup disk. Should I be worried? Can Disk Utility make things worse?
For what it's worth, the computer is working and now has 8 GB free on a 40 GB drive.
These are the problems found:
Volume Bitmap needs minor repair
Invalid volume free block count
Volume header needs minor repair
Error: the underlying task reported failure on exit.
It's that last one that's got me worried.
Should I let Disk Utility fix it?
Thanks to anybody in advance for any light they can shed.
Steve

HI Steve,
No, Disk Utility is just a utility. It can't make anything worse.
Yes, let DU fix this error. Definitely!!!!
If fact, if it doesn't repair the error(s) on the first past, click Repair again.
What did you mean by, "Lotsa red ink" ?? Do you mean the errors were reported in red? That's normal.
IF... Disk Utility cannot repair the disk, then DiskWarrior is the best bet to repair the drive.
Carolyn

I accidentally opened a malicious email with my iPhone. Are there any specific precautions/actions I should take?

I awoke one morning and in my "still not awake" state, I checked my email on my iPhone to find a "your deposit was rejected" email in my inbox. Having deposited a check online the night before, and still not completely conscious, I opened the email and clicked the link to the bank statement. Had my eyes not been blurry and I was actually awake I would have realized earlier that this was neither my bank nor that sneaky of an attempt to get me to click on the link. I realized about 3 seconds after clicking on the link that this was malicious, closed the mail app, closed safari, cleared the cookies and closed all tabs, deleted the email from the inbox and trash.
Is there any danger of this foolish mistake migrating to my MBP? Is there anything more that I should do to avoid this becoming a larger security breach?
I appreciate all answers.

There is an antivirus app in Apple's ios app store. It is from Intego. It will not scan your ios device, but it will scan the attachment that you found on your email and if it is malicious then the scan should identify it and give you the option to safely delete or quarantine it. You have to use your finger or a stylus to select what you want it to scan. You just press down on what you want it to scan and don't let go, and then it launches and quickly scans that one item. This is useful to make sure you don't spread it to other people more so than protecting your own device, I've heard, as the ios devices are already fairly safe.
I have the Intego app and can vouch that it is easy to use. I scanned a few pdf files I saved on my iPhone 4 and they were clean.
If you are worried about your Mac, I recommend trying ESET antivirus for Mac. It is light on resources and does not cause any problems, whereas most other antivirus software programs are notorious for causing problems on the Mac. I've had ESET since June on my iMac and haven't had any problems, and it does not slow down my Mac or hog resources.

In some computers I cannot find "Switch Page Direction" on the shortcut Menu or "View" Menu. Is there any setting related to this subject?

Hi
I have a problem with my firefox browser. please Help me!
In some computers I cannot find "Switch Page Direction" on the shortcut Menu or "View" Menu. Is there any setting related to this subject?
thanks

In order to change your Firefox Configuration please do the following steps :
# In the [[Location bar autocomplete|Location bar]], type '''about:config''' and press '''Enter'''. The about:config "''This might void your warranty!''" warning page may appear.
# Click '''I'll be careful, I promise!''' to continue to the about:config page.
# Look for '''bidi.browser.ui''', change its value to '''true''', restart Firefox, then right click to see the '''Switch Page Direction'''

HT201250 Is there any way to schedule backups on Time Machine? I hate it that backup happens every dang hour. I would like to have it back up at night.

Is there any way to schedule backups on Time Machine? I hate it that backup happens every dang hour. I would like to have it back up at night.

Richard Campbell2 wrote:
I hear you, I do. But the problem is that with my Mac, I have to stop and postpone whatever project I am working on while the backup occurs. It just slows down my computer.
Then something is wrong with your backups. Changing the interval will only deal with they symptoms, not the actual problem, and you won't be as well protected as with hourly backups.
If the backups are much larger than they ought to be, see #D4 in Time Machine - Troubleshooting.
If the sizes are reasonable, but it seems to take too long, see #D2 there.

Is there any information about using iCloud on a Mac with multiple user accounts (Mountain Lion)

When upgrading to Mountain Lion, you are asked to sign in using your iCloud ID. I don't understand how to set up the proper synching of "stuff" if your Mac has multiple user accounts, and they each have their own iCloud ID.
The whole issue of supporting multiple users on a Mac and making everything easy to understand with regard to iTunes and iCloud is, in my opinion, currently in a state of disaster. Apple needs to address this. They have conveniently made it a non-issue on iPads by not allowing multiple users. I can tell you that as one of the resident iOS and Apple experts in my office, most of the questions I get from others (not work-related) are on this topic. It needs to be easier to understand and accomplish.
Thanks in advance for any information you have on this subject.

CS7981 wrote:
is "Is there any benefit to using my Airport Express with my wireless router
no.

Is there any version of Indesign that allows to open multiple instance at the same time

I am using Indesign CS3 to generate the bulk reports automatically(programmatically) using Adobe indesign library . One of the key limitation to this tool is it allows to open only one instance at a time unlike word where multiple instances can be opened at the same time. Is there any adobe indesign too version desktop/server which allows to open multiple instances at the same time. Any help on is appreciated. Thanks.

@PeterG
You said "You might want to examine the End User Licensing Agreement (EULA) for any prohibition against using these two instances at the same time with the same license; the license does permit two installs for the same user that are not used simultaneously." I thought that meant you had read the EULA. It's pretty unambiguous on that point.
For everyone's edification about multiple installations and server use with a standard license here's the relevant text:
2. Software License.
If you obtained the Software and any required serial number(s) from Adobe or one of its authorized
licensees and as long as you comply with the terms of this agreement, Adobe grants you a non-exclusive
license to install and use the Software in a manner consistent with its design and Documentation and as
further set forth below. See Section 16 for specific provisions related to the use of certain products and
components, for example font software, Acrobat, After Effects, Adobe Presenter, Contribute, Adobe
Device Central, Flash Player, Flash Builder, and Adobe Runtimes.
2.1 Limited Use. The Software, or portions of the Software, may allow installation and use without a serial
number. If so, you may install but not use such non-serialized Software on any number of Computers as
part of an organizational deployment plan. Further, you may install and use such non-serialized Software
on any number of Computers for demonstration, evaluation and training purposes only and only if any
Output Files or other materials produced through such use are used only for internal, non-commercial and
non-production purposes. You may not use such non-serialized Software after any applicable time-out
period has ended, unless you input a valid serial number under Section 2.2. ACCESS TO AND USE OF
ANY OUTPUT FILES CREATED WITH SUCH NON-SERIALIZED SOFTWARE IS ENTIRELY AT
YOUR OWN RISK.
2.2 General Use. You may install and use one copy of the Software only on the Permitted Number of your
compatible Computers into which you enter a valid serial number.
2.3 Distribution from Server. You may copy an image of the Software onto Computer file server(s) within
your Internal Network for the purpose of downloading and installing the Software onto Computers within
the same Internal Network for use as permitted by Section 2.1 and 2.2.
2.4 Server Use. You may install the Software on Computer file server(s) within your Internal Network only
for use of the Software initiated by an individual from a Computer within the same Internal Network only
as permitted by Section 2.2. The total number of users (not the concurrent number of users) able to use the
Software on such Computer file server(s) may not exceed the Permitted Number.
By way of example, the foregoing does not permit you to install or access (either directly or through
commands, data or instructions) the Software: (a) from or to a Computer not part of your Internal Network,
(b) for enabling Web hosted workgroups or services available to the public, (c) by any individual or entity
to use, download, copy or otherwise benefit from the functionality of the Software unless licensed to do so
by Adobe, (d) as a component of a system, workflow or service accessible by more than the Permitted
Number of users, or (e) for operations not initiated by an individual user (e.g., automated server
processing).
2.5 Portable or Home Computer Use. Subject to the important restrictions set forth in Section 2.6, the
primary user of the Computer on which the Software is installed under Section 2.2 (“Primary User”) may
install a second copy of the Software for his or her exclusive use on either a portable Computer or a
Computer located at his or her home, provided that the Software on the portable or home Computer is not
used at the same time as the Software on the primary Computer.
2.6 Restrictions on Secondary Use by Volume Licensees. If the Software was obtained under an Adobe
volume license program (currently known as Adobe Open Options) by any licensee other than an
educational volume licensee, the second copy of the Software made under Section 2.5 must be used solely
for the benefit and business of that volume licensee. For more information about secondary use by volume
licensees, please visit our Web Site at http://www.adobe.com/go/open_options.
There is also language stating that if you have a dual boot or other system capable of running more than one OS you will need a separate license for each platform if you want to run the software on more than one.

Is there any way to prevent non-root users from rebooting the system?

This question seems to be addressed many times on the web, but the problem is that none of the wannabe-howtos work on my system. In particular, this doesn't work and this doesn't work either, because (1) I need to keep policykit installed for udisks and other dependencies to function and (2) renaming (or removing) the file /usr/share/polkit-1/actions/org.freedesktop.login1.policy has (again) no effect on the users' ability to reboot and shut down the system. Even more surprisingly, adding the following to /etc/polkit-1/rules.d/20-disable-shutdown.rules has no effect at all:
polkit.addRule(function(action, subject) {
if (
action.id == "org.freedesktop.login1.power-off" ||
action.id == "org.freedesktop.login1.reboot" ||
action.id == "org.freedesktop.login1.suspend" ||
action.id == "org.freedesktop.upower.suspend" ||
action.id == "org.freedesktop.login1.hibernate" ||
action.id == "org.freedesktop.upower.hibernate"
return polkit.Result.NO;
As a result, ordinary users (not in the wheel group and with no special permissions) can simply reboot the machine by typing reboot. I remember that a simple polkit rule (as proposed on the Fedora forum) worked fine just a few months ago, but this doesn't work nowadays. The action IDs mentioned there are no longer listed in pkaction, so it's quite obvious that some changes (and bugs) have been introduced since then. I just need to prevent the users from rebooting the machine and to keep policykit installed. Is there any way to do this?

karol wrote:Do said users have the ability to push the Power or Reset buttons?
No, they don't.
But come on, access permissions are a matter of principle rather than a matter of what you can possibly do with a hammer in your hand. That makes your question somewhat irrelevant to this issue. Imagine someone asking: "How can I protect my home directory from access by other users?" You would then probably ask: "Do said users have the ability to pull out the hard drive and mount it on their computer?"
Even if the users had physical access to the ACPI buttons, rebooting the computer by mistake (via software) would still be much more likely than pressing (or even holding) the ACPI buttons by mistake.
If I call rm -Rf / as a normal user, nothing should happen to the system in terms of availability to other users. Only my home directory and temporary files would vanish, but that's all. This is what permissions are there for. Similarly, when I type reboot as a normal user (no matter if I'm on SSH, on a local terminal or logged into KDE), it should be possible to simply disallow rebooting.
The idea that users logged in locally can restart the computer may be fine for laptops under certain conditions, but it is a bad idea in almost all other cases. In a "kiosk" type environment, for example, the ability to reboot and get to the bootloader can be a huge security hole, unless all your disks are encrypted, and a huge "reliability hole" in any case. Suppose you use a desktop as a home server. You want everyone to be able to log in and to connect a USB flash drive (using polkit and udisks). But you simply don't want the machine to be rebooted. Why is such a simple thing so hard to do?
Last edited by andrej.podzimek (2014-03-10 02:15:35)

Is there any way to get around using iTunes.7 with a Nano (secnd gen)?

I, like many others received a pretty new Nano from Santa, but was disappointed to find that.. it doesn't seem to be usable!
I have a iMac (os x 10.2.8) and a iBook G4 (os x 10.3.7)
BUT as I'm sure you're aware, I can't update the iTunes on either to version 7 because it's only compatible with 10.3.9 or higher..
As I am only a poor design student, there is no way I can afford a new os, so my question is really, what the subject said, is there any way I can get around using iTunes to put music on my iPod? or am I pretty much screwed?
Any suggestions would be really aprechiated! I just want to be able to use it!
Thanks
Sacha
xxxxx
iMac. iBook. Mac OS X (10.3.7)

Here:
http://www.apple.com/macosx/tiger/
The current retail version is 10.4.6.
You should make sure that your computer meets the minimum requirements for 10.4.6 before you purchase.
They are listed here:
http://www.apple.com/macosx/upgrade/requirements.html

Is there any danger subjecting a WRE54g to below freezing temperatures?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for