Is there anything better than iPihoto?

Hi there,
I'm a long time iPhoto user, but I think I'm out growing it. I have about 5000 photos in my library now (and no, I don't want to split it into smaller libraries). I have a 1ghz PowerMac G4 and the speed of iPhoto isn't that bad. The issue I have is that I about to get a dSLR and I think I will be taking much more photos, so I see my library growing faster.
I'm about to keyword tag all my photos with people, places, and things, and rate all the photos (I know, major job, but I'm anal enough to do it Before I undertake such and job, I want to know that my work won't be wasted.
Here are my criteria for my image management program:
1) easy to use
2) Albums, or the ability to place photos in virtual containers
3) keywords with ease of entering and assigning them
4) ratings (1-5 is fine)
5) web publishing. here's the hard one. I don't want to create web galleries from my library, I want to have the library dynamically published. Right now I use iPhoto and iPhotoWebShare, which works pretty well. I want more. I want the ability to search by keyword, not unlike how you can search within iPhoto. Ideally, the search would let the user search by keywords and ratings. I'm not above writing my own web system (i'm in the process of dumping the iPhoto data to a sqlite database, and then writing a php search engine), so if there is no native web publishing, at lease good scripting capabilities to get the data out.
I figure the obvious choices are cumulus, portfolio, and iview. iPhoto might still fit the bill, but it just seems fragile. Maybe iPhoto 6 will use core data and we will have direct sqlite access to the database (cool), but until that is announced, I'm not willing to hold my breath.
Any ideas?

Allan
I was in a similar situation to you, and decided to go with Portfolio.
I'm currently in the process of migrating my iPhoto libraries to Portfolio, and I'm very impressed by the sotware. Most important thing for me is stability (closely followed by feature set) and it hasn't crashed once so far.
It easily takes care of items 1 to 3, though I'm not sure about item 4 (I'll check when I go home tonight); I use a "Favourite" keyword, rather than a rating system. And, even if it doesn't, you could replicate it using keywords of 0 through 5.
I use a combination of real, physical "watch" folders (I like to store the originals in folder(s) based on date taken), smart folders (keywords, etc..), and virtual folders (events, vacations).
To meet #5, Portfolio 7 comes with a basic version of NetPublish that allows for one concurrent connection to the website per hour. If this isn't sufficient, you'll have to pay for the full version of NetPublish.
Obviously, Portfolio's a serious financial investment ($200), so I'd recommend you take a look at the 30 day trial version and see what you think. There's also copious documentation available at their web site.

Similar Messages

Is there anything better than the cloud app

I am new to the "cloud" and although I understand FTP pretty well, I don't understand the cloud very well. I am going on vacation with my ipad and want to take along some word documents and an mp3 file to transcribe some audio.
I have the pages app and can drag the word docs into pages and the .mp3 into itunes, but this is a projec that I want to save in a folder. Anything I create I want to save in a folder and want to be able to download it to my MAC and visa versa when I get home.
Anything free app out there with the ability to let me download and store a folder. Can I also have full access to this folder on my ipad without having pages documents and mp3 documents spread all over my ipad?
Hope this isn't to confusing. I wished Ipad had a usb port.
Thanks

I agree on DropBox.
In DropBox, Favorite (Star) the files (documents, MP3...) when you are on-line. They will be available when you are off-line. Test access to your files in Airplane mode before you leave home.
To bring the document into an app (e.g., Pages), use 'Open In..'.. the MP3, you can just tap in DropBox.
There are solutions to get files back from different apps to DropBox, but honestly it is probably just easiest to email it to yourself (and then use your Mac to copy the final file back to DropBox for reference purposes).
Have a good vacation.

Is there anything better than a new iphone?

Hello,
My 3G iphone is coming to the end of its contract and I can get a new phone. I have an imac desktop so I am looking for something that will sync my diary, contacts and music easily. Are there any cheaper alternatives to the iphone? Im not sure I want another one...

If you are running a Mac OS less than Lion, there are literally hundreds of iSync compatible phones.
See http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2824 for natively supported devices.
See http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2520 for devices supported via a third party iSync plugin.
Other Mac syncing solutions for non-Apple phones include the "Missing Sync" range of products, "Blackberry Desktop Manager" for Blackberry devices, and "SyncMate". Check the websites for lists of phones these products support.

Test-to-speech program--anything better than Voice Dream Reader? I have AMD and NEED the serviced.

I have AMD and need a text-to-speech reader; anythiung better than Voice Dream Reader? HELP!!

My son uses Touch Chat. It wworks great for him. he is 14 years old and has been using it for 2 years. You can set up several different pages to ease navigations.

Anything better than Canon XL-2?

My company is needing to purchase a new camera because our XL-1 is pixelating and tiling - I've tried the fixes but none seem to be a reliable fix. We've lost a lot of video because of that. I've looked at the XL-2 and love all the features. I was just wondering if there is another camera on the market that you would recommend in comparison to the XL-2. We don't need a HD camera and all our setup is based around miniDV. I appreciate any suggestions!

Bad is in the eye of the beholder .. and the ability of the shooter, no doubt. Because I work with cameramen who are not always the most seasoned, a more simple "out of the box" camera seems to fair better: Tho I still contend the Panasonic and Sony always seem to look good
Problem with the Canon is mostly around the auto-iris (mind you, I edit I don't shoot so I don't know what the specific functions are called)and for sure the autofocus. I always reccomend not using autofocus but some guys are going to go there, and the Canon's seems particulary sensitive, which in a live event sceneario leaves the editor with a mess on his hands
Also, in a lower light situation (again, in the live event world this can be unavoidable due to some clients insisting on no lights) the Cannon does not seem to match up against the Sony; when boosting the setup or gamma in post, you tend to see a lot more grain with the Cannon.
The tapes I've seen from the Cannon never seem to have the chroma right; colors seem a bit skewed towards the green and the blacks are fairly crushed
Again, I'm sure with the right lighting conditions, different lenses etc you could produce a nice image with the Cannon. I actally worked on a TV wedding show where they shot with XL2s and it looked nice .. but they used lighting setups that would be impossible for us in the real world. So, sure, caveats always apply
All said and done tho, I would give the nod to the Panasonic and the Sony

Is there something better than CMD+Z for mass UNDOs?

After a month of superb Macprovideo training in FCPX and futile searches of the "worthless" FCPX help[less] document, I cannot find more on a VERY BASIC subject that pertains to everybody using FCPX.
EDITING HISTORY: Since we have NO control over our SAVES, how do you undo the last 50 changes --or-- undo everything since 10am? Do I have to hit CMD+Z until I get callouses? I did see a reference to TIMELINE HISTORY but the doc is skimpy & doesn't seem relevant.
If there is a window that shows a chronological order of changes & time with the option to UNDO, that would be great. If I've missed it, please advise.
Thank you for time & thoughts.
-Dale

Thank you R&B, you're an officer & a gentleman.
BTY- I can never figure out why folks on this (and all other forums) have ALIAS names. If they don't know you by your real name, then I can't see the purpose of an alias.

Is there one better than D90?

I have stared doing youth sports photography and up until this point I have chosen outdoor sports as my old reliable camera could handle it. Starting this year I am taking on indoor sports and some awards ceremonies that are notorious for the low light conditions and bad pictures due to this. I am looking for a camera with a high shutter speed but I also want it to be able to take great pictures in low light conditions of objects that are moving. I have found iti s next to impossible to have a child stand still in low light even for just a snapshot of them! I was reading the reviews for the D90 and there were some comments that it takes great low light pictures as long as there is no movement. Can anyone suggest a good camera with an auto setting that takes great lowlight pictures of things that ARE moving. Thanks!!

Well you are going to have to invest in faster lenses. I'm assuming you still have the 'kit' lenses. Maybe try a Nikon 17-55mm F2.8, Nikon 24-80 F2.8 or Nikon 70-200 F2.8 (or their 3rd party equivelents). Raise the ISO up has high as you can without getting too much noise.
King of the World...

Anything better than apple?

Hi,
After finding my bedroom Pansonic TX-26LXD60 incompatible with my MacBook Pro - the outsides of the outputted screen can't be seen (toolbar and dock etc.) and seeing that I won't be able to use the 46" Bravia sitting downstairs much because it is the main tv for the household and my parents won't like me, certainly as a long term solution, using it, I'm looking for a monitor to use with my new computer.
I have a PS3 which functions as my TV when needed but it obviously has to output to something.
I would like the Apple 24" to be honest, but are there any adaptors to change that mini-displayport to HDMI?
I like the USB ports on the back and the capability to charge my MacBook Pro, they are huge benefits.
If not, what would you recommend for a 24"-26" monitor (resolution needs to be 1920x1200 or greater) within the price range of the Apple?
Thanks all,
Fred

You can use the mini to stream stuff. Buying the Apple TV would be mostly redundant if you already need to buy the mini for regular computer use.

Anything better than Time Machine Buddy??

I'm not satisfied with the fact that this Widget does not appear to give me a History of backups and am wondering if anyone has any suggestions for other tools to monitor the state of my backup.
I have a 2TB Time Capsule and I just got into my MacPro (1TB) and MacBookPro (150 GB) backups by entering Time Machine on each machine and I see that on the left hand side my MacBookPro goes back to September of 2011 (great) but the MacPro on the left hand side only shows that this backup goes back 1 day (very bad).
Is there something that will let me check this kind of information instead of what appears to be simply a report on the last /successfull/ backup?
Thanks.

I see. Thanks Bob.
This will show what has been backed up by way of files on each Time Machine backup - say in addition to simply saying "Here are the last fifteen or twenty or thirty successful backups and their dates"?
You know what I mean?
I mean, I think I really only need it to show me a large number of successful backups and their dates so that I can see this in time and not have to actually get into Time Machine to see this if that makes sense.
Thank you/

Anything Better Than OMF or AAF?

I've been going back and forth trying to figure out a way to make a self contained and consolidated Soundtrack Pro file to send to another computer for mixing. Our process is that of a post house where editing is normally done in one room and then it's sent to audio in a different room. It seems to me that Apple and only thought about one computer operations and never thought about seemless transfers to other computers. Here are the processes I have tried so far:
-exporting an OMF out of Final Cut and importing it into Soundtrack Pro. The problem here is that stereo tracks are not kept in tackt when opening up in Soundtrack Pro which is a nightmare to edit.
-exporting an AAF out of Final Cut and importing it into Soundtrack Pro. This problem is the same as above except it also makes duplicates of all mono tracks.
-sending the sequence from Final Cut to Soundtrack Pro, then saving the project and copying all media. This problem is that it doesn't consolidate the media and I end up with a huge folder of audio.
In all three of these scenarios, crossfades are intact, but end fades never show up, which can also be a bit of a problem. When exporting a session out of Final Cut for audio, I can never seem to find a way to make two mono tracks into a stereo track for ease of editing and mixing. I've tried grouping tracks and sending them to a submix to treat them as a stereo pair, but editing grouped tracks doesn't really work like I would have expected it. If anyone has any help or suggestions it would be appreciated.
Thanks,
-b

Try saving the project with all its media in a single folder.
1. Save or Save As
2. Click the *New Folder* button and name the folder
3. Check the box to *Collect All Media*
4. Click Save
Now you have a folder with a stmp file and a media folder containing all the elements. Move that to the other mixing station.

What are some good apps for changing the pitch of my music? I currently use djay. Is there anything better?

I like shifting the pitch of songs, it makes it sound new to me. what are some good apps that can do this? right now I use djay

I like shifting the pitch of songs, it makes it sound new to me. what are some good apps that can do this? right now I use djay

Is there nothing better around???

< panic: can't find / >
|o_o |
|:_/ |
(| | )
/'_ _/`
___)=(___/
this was the greeting when i logged in some minutes ago ... this brings me to another thinking: the only thing archlinux cannot support are "bluescreens of death" (those, who changed totally to non-windows-os and forgot: = the nice screens that apear when your (windows)kernel is in panic) ... well, you can simulate simmilar things with fortune
to the subject:
i wanted to install a 3rd OS on my notebook (besides the 2GBwinXP and arch), after removing finally SuSE 8.2 --- now, arch is my prime OS, winXP is kept only because of compatibility --- when someone wants to do something only a windows is able to (e.g. to crash the OS when you dont expect it to crash --- while clicking the most important button on such an OS ).
Now the thing is: i wanted to install something totally new (like i did about a year ago with arch while using SuSE) just to try to enhance the possibilities you can have with a A31p-Thinkpad (the 4kg must be worth something) --- i was searching on the internet for long, but i cant find anything better than arch (for my needs = stability, easy upgrade, clean /etc, latest packages, easy way to build packages, package-management with dependences-tracking)
gentoo --- maybe when it becomes mature, great docs!
sourcer --- maybe when it becomes mature, and cleans up
slackware --- not modern enough, but my favourite for years
SuSE --- >7.1pro are not longer "linux", sorry (but great package-repository)
RedHat --- Toys are nice, but this is not an OS, sorry
Mandrake --- very nice installer (i wish i have such a installer on archlinux --- not the GUI, but the possibilities (NTFS- resizing, ...)), but the system is to much "newbie-like" planed
FreeBSD --- the logo is ok, the system not up-to-date
i tried to build a generic, source-driven, linux (do it your self - linux), but the dependences make you crazy after the first weekend :-)
-> i'm going to install a 2nd arch on this drive ... it will become the backup-system
-> if someone can tell me another linux distro i should try i didnt already ... i'm hearing...

_JeffG_ wrote:
FreeBSD --- the logo is ok, the system not up-to-date
What do you mean by this? I just scrapped a working up-to-date FreeBSD install for Arch Linux. In my opinion the only thing FreeBSD was missing was good browser plugins and a good jdk.
Jeff
-> JDK is too old (as you also saw)
-> some hardware are not supported (i cant watch TV over my USB-Hauppauge-card :-( ) ... the linux-kernel is better from this point of view
as i need JDK 1.4 and sometimes i like watching tv, it's not a big desicion, not to use FreeBSD

What's better than Illustrator?

I've been using Illustrator for many years and several versions. My usage is nominal and occasional/once a week, and I don't get very sophisticated for my needs, so it has been OK so far. I do not do commercial work but know Ai is the "de-facto std".
But I read this forum often and see many criticisms of Ai and I do have occasional issues with Illy with tools and UI....just not as easy or robust as it could/should be...cumbersome at times.
I see JET and others here make great use of Illy but also criticize (justifiably) it for not being as good as other vector tools.
I know there are competitors, Inkscape is free, others less costly than Illy; and seemingly better/easier/faster to use...at least for some things.
So my question: What is better than Illustrator (I'm using CS5) and why? What can they do better than Ai? Is it worth having a second program and learning (tho I suspect the learning curve should be easy as they do similar things but have different GUI). Or replacing Illy with something?
Pro's/Con's that would make one make the effort to try/use something else? I don't even know what out there is better than Illy. I've searched www and got a few hints but nothing very significant.
Am I wasting my time looking?
Your feedback welcomed to help me decide whether to explore/trial other programs.

I see JET and others here...criticize (justifiably) it for not being as good as other vector tools.
I can't speak for "and others", but since I'm the only one you mention by name:
If you've already deemed the criticism justifiable, then you must already know what that criticism says. When I criticize Illustrator, I don't just say "Illustrator is crap" and leave it at that, unsupported. I'm careful to explain myself with facts pertinent to the context of the discussion. I actually own and know how to use the other programs to which I compare. I've often posted lists of comparitive features.
I've always used my real name here and sign all my posts with my initials. So finding my comments is not difficult.
I know there are competitors, Inkscape is free, others less costly than Illy; and seemingly better/easier/faster to use...at least for some things. So my question: What is better than Illustrator (I'm using CS5) and why? What can they do better than Ai?
Didn't you just answer your own question? Other than the broadly general things you just mentioned, what program do you want to compare, and for doing what? Surely you're not asking someone to do an exhaustive feature-by-feature comparison between Illustrator and all similar programs in this one thread?
All you've said about what you use Illustrator for is that your use is nominal, occasional, unsophisticated, and non-commerical. Mine isn't. Commerical graphics has been my livelihood for over 40 years. Vector-based illustration is both a speciality and a passion.
I...knowAi is the "de-facto std"
"Defacto standard" is self-fulfilling. It's effectively equivalent to saying "More people use Illustrator because more people use Illustrator."
So what? More people ride Vespa scooters than KTM motorcycles. But which one would you call "professional quality"? You can use either one to pick up a gallon of orange juice at the corner store. But if you enter an enduro, the KTM will get the job done with alot less stress.
The myth is that most software buyers choose the best. That's as naive as the faith that most voters do.
Illustrator has been slothfully resting on its "defacto standard" haunches since the dark ages (AKA the 80s). "Defacto standard" be hanged.
I do have occasional issues with Illy with tools and UI....just not as easy or robust as it could/should be...cumbersome at times.
Okay. What issues? State something specific and users actually familiar with other programs can compare.
This is the 21st century. There's really little new under the sun here. A 2D drawing program is just an interface pasted on top of mostly the same old geometric functionality. The competitive advantage goes to the offering that best (easy) and most fully (robust) empowers the user. The multiplication of easy and robust yields elegance. That's a term I've never applied to Illustrator. Illustrator is one of the oldest of the bunch, lounging under the sun for so long it's at risk of skin cancer. Yet it still fails to provide basic functionality users of other drawing programs have taken for granted for decades.
Examples that may be germane to your casual, non-commerical use? Try these things in Illustrator:
Star Tool: Draw a star. Now change the number of points it has.
Arc Tool: Draw 36 degrees of a circular arc.
Label that star with a dimension.
Distribute a group of different objects along a curve.
Uniformly space Blend steps along a non-uniform curve.
Attach a Blend to a closed path and have the first/last instances properly positioned.
Knife Tool: Cut across an open unfilled path.
Connect a text label to an object that stays connected when you move it.
Paste a simple graphic into a text string so that it flows with the text.
Perform a Find/Replace on carriage returns.
Round Corners: Apply it to an accute or obtuse angle and have it actually yield the radius you specify.
Crop a raster image.
Rotate something. Go back later and find out what its rotation angle is.
Pathfinders: Use them without wrecking existing fills/strokes.
I could go on (and have). How long a list do you want? All the features/functions associated with the above basic operations (and many more) are substandard, half-baked, or even non-existent in Illustrator. This is "professional"-grade software? No, it's largely consumerish rubbish sold at exhorbitant prices just because it's the "defacto standard."
Is it worth having a second program and learning...
Obviously, it is to me (and a third, and a fourth, and...). As I've said many times in this forum, I don't know how anyone can legitimately claim to compare two programs if they've only got workaday familiarity with one.
As with any other endeavor, the more drawing programs you're comfortable with, the less arduous it is to pick up another, because you tend to pick up on the underlying principles involved, as opposed to just becomming habituated to a particular program's command locations and procedures by rote.
But you've been using AI for "many years" and find it to be "OK". So if you're happy with it, use it.
I have a cheap, consumerish Ryobi table saw and it's "OK." But I didn't pay a professional-grade price for it, either. And I'm sure not going to write glorious reviews on it, call it "professional," and get all fearfully brand-loyal defensive about it if someone dares suggest I might ought to learn to use a different one. My use of it, like yours, is merely occasional. But I also presently need to build a TV cabinet, and I'm dreading it. If I were to open a cabinet shop, I'd be much more discriminating, and would do my own homework to make an informed decision.
Or replacing Illy with something?
One doesn't have to "replace." There's nothing any more wrong with using more than one 2D drawing program than there is with using more than one 3D modeling program, or raster imaging program, or page layout program, or word processor, or video edting program, or....
Pro's/Con's that would make one make the effort to try/use something else?
That depends on what one is doing with it. Not knowing that, I can again only offer generalities that matter to me: If you've only ever used one program of a particulat kind, you're rather in the dark regarding functionality that you may be missing that may be important to you. (Second-degree ignorance: You don't know what you don't know.) If you're mission-dependent upon that one program, you're also kind of captive to the whims and agenda of its vendor.
That very well may not matter to you, given your nominal, occasional, unsophisticated, and non-commerical use. And if so, that's fine.
I don't even know what out there is better than Illy. I've searched www and got a few hints but nothing very significant.
But you just said you've been reading a bunch of posts here which mention other programs.
Am I wasting my time looking?
Only you can answer that about your time. Time is all any of us have.
Your feedback welcomed to help me decide whether to explore/trial other programs.
No offense, but frankly it sounds like you're just not motivated enough to do your own homework. If you are sufficiently motivated, visit the websites of other drawing program vendors. Read the features lists. Dowload the demos, read the documentation, and try them out. Visit the programs' user forums. Or, if it's really not that important to you, don't.
If you've got questions about specific functionality and/or specific programs, be more specific about what you do (or want to do).
JET

Is there a way that i can downgrade my iOS 7.1 on my iPhone 4 to iOS 6xx? battery life not good, and performance isn't better than iOS 6.. Please apple i am really disappointed with iOS 7 on my iPhone 4

Is there a way that i can downgrade my iOS 7.1 on my iPhone 4 to iOS 6xx? battery life not good, and performance isn't better than iOS 6.. Please apple i am really disappointed with iOS 7 on my iPhone 4, it can runs great on iPhone above 4 such as 5/5s/etc.. iPhone 4 just good with iOS 6...

No.

Is there any better way for updating table other than this?

Hi all, I need to update a row in the table that require me to search for it first (the table will have more than hundred thousands of row). Now, I am using a LOV that will return the primary key of the row and put that primary key to DEFAULT_WHERE property in the block and execute query command to fetch the row that need updating. This works fine except that it require 2-query-trip per update (the lov and the execute_query). Is there any better way to doing this? This update is the main objective for my application and I need to use the most effective way to do it since we need to update many records per hour.

Thanks Rama, I will try your method. Others, how to query row instead of primary key? I thought that querying primary key is faster due to the index?
BTW, what people do if you need to update a table using Form? I have been using the LOV then execute query since I first developing form. But I am building a bigger database recently that I start worrying about multiple query trip to dbms.
FYI my table will have up to million rows on it. Each row will be very active (updated) within 1-2 weeks after it creation. After that it will exist for records purposes only (select only). The active rows are probably less than 1% of all the rows.

Is there anything better than iPihoto?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for