Is there Async-Sync bridge in BPM

Hi ,
I am trying this scenario in ccBPM(PI7.10
JMS(Async)>MDM(Sync)>SAP(Sync)
The reason I cant use it without BPM is that message in JMS is needed in SAP step.I am not sure of messages can be persisted without a ccBPM.
When I give receive step as Async,in next send (Sync call) ,I cant see any Syn Abstract interfaces even though i have declared one.Only Asyn abstract interfaces appear to chose container element as abstract type.
In what way can I specify Aysn-Sync bridge in ccBPM ?
Regards,
Premjit

the async / sync scenarios can be configured via two options;
ref these
/people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/27/rfc-scenario-using-bpm--starter-kit
Without BPM
File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19.

Similar Messages

Async Sync Bridge without BPM (Proxy-Soap-Idoc)

Hi,
I have read some blogs how to do the Async Sync Bridge without BPM for JMS adapters. I have a requirement that I am getting a Async Proxy message to PI and then PI makes Sync Soap call then the result need to send through the Idoc adapter.
Proxy - Soap- Idoc
Here Proxy is a sender so no adapter required in the Config and also Soap is java based adapter and Idoc adapter is a ABAP based so I am not sure this is possible but I just wanted to check with you.
Please let know if this is possible or not?
PI 7.1 with EHP1
Thanks,
Laxman
Edited by: Laxman Molugu on Oct 14, 2010 2:15 PM

The mapping programm can be defined as a user defined function. As sample of mine is "getGoogle()", which is doing some kind of address validation. The input parameter URL[0] contains source address. For that you need to import:
org.apache.commons.logging.*;
org.w3c.dom.*;
javax.xml.parsers.*;
org.xml.sax.SAXException;
org.apache.commons.httpclient.*;
org.apache.commons.httpclient.methods.*;
org.apache.commons.codec.*;
org.apache.log4j.*;
Example code for UDF "getGoogle()" is:
String sUrl = "http://maps.google.de/maps/api/geocode/xml?address=" + URL[0] + "&sensor=false";
HttpClient client = new HttpClient();
GetMethod method = new GetMethod(sUrl);
byte[] responseBody = null;
    try {
//      int statusCode = client.executeMethod(method);
//      byte[] responseBody = method.getResponseBody();
//     result.addValue(new String(responseBody));
String sResponse = "initial";
int statusCode = client.executeMethod(method);
responseBody = method.getResponseBody();
ByteArrayInputStream bis = new ByteArrayInputStream(responseBody);
DocumentBuilderFactory factory = DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance();
DocumentBuilder db = factory.newDocumentBuilder();
Document doc = db.parse(bis);
doc.getDocumentElement().normalize();
NodeList nodeLst = doc.getElementsByTagName("formatted_address");
Node formAdr = nodeLst.item(0);
NodeList nlFormAdr = formAdr.getChildNodes();
sResponse = ((Node) nlFormAdr.item(0)).getNodeValue();
      // Deal with the response.
    result.addValue(sResponse);
    } catch (Exception e) {
      result.addValue(e.toString() + "######## exhrenda - googleResponse:############### URL=" + sUrl+"###########"+new String(responseBody));
    } finally {
      // Release the connection.
      method.releaseConnection();

Async-Sync Bridge without BPM for SOAP WS and JDBC

I heard you can now have async-sync communication outside of BPM by utilizing adapter modules?
My scenarios are:
proxy (async) -> SOAP WS (sync)
proxy (async) -> JDBC (sync)
I will like to capture the synchronous responses in XI and perform some basic error handling.
I read h[File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19.|File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19.] and the release notes for 2004s SP19 and there is no reference to JDBC or SOAP.
tia

Hi Megha,
Plz do refer the below links u will get an idea:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a05b2347-01e7-2910-ceac-c45577e574e0
Sync/Async communication in Adapter without BPM (SP19)
Sync/Async communication in JMS adapter without BPM (SP19)
Async/Sync Communication using JMS adapter without BPM (SP 19)
Async/Sync Communication using JMS adapter without BPM (SP 19)
also try this
Sync/Async communication in JMS adapter without BPM (SP19)
File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19.
Collecting IDocs without using BPM
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5059f110-0d01-0010-7c8b-fdc983be70c0
Have a look
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5059f110-0d01-0010-7c8b-fdc983be70c0
HTTP to RFC - A Starter Kit
Sync/Async communication in JMS adapter without BPM (SP19)
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
Do refer this thread:
JDBC Async-Sync bridge does not work
Reward if found useful
Regards,
Vinod.

Alerts and Error handling in BPM Async/Sync Bridge

Hello All,
I am developing an Async/Sync Bridge in BPM for sending a request from ECC webservice asychronously to a front end application synchronously using BPM Async/Sync Bridge. I get a response from the front end to PI and stays there.
It wont be send back to ECC. What are the possibilities of error handling required in this type of scenario.
Thanks
Deno

. I get a response from the front end to PI and stays there.
Then it should mean that the BPM design is faulty...did you have a send step at the end which closes the Async-Sync Bridge by sending the message to original sender?
In SXMB_MONI --> For BPM message processing there will be a link called PE...click it...check the graphic workflow...see till where the message has processed.
error handling
include your Sync send step whithin a Block....this block will have an Exception Branch....in this exception branch you can have your Exception handling logic...like raise alert, cancel process etc.
Regards,
Abhishek.

QOS in Async/sync bridge

Hey guys
does QOS change in an Async/Sync bridge in BPM?
thanx
Ahmad

Yes Ahmed, Async/Sync bridge meant for this only
QOS for Async is EO
and for Sync it is BE.
So in the bridge QoS will change from EO to BE
or you can do a reverse also .i e BE to EO
Bipin

Async-sync bridge behavior

Hello all,
we have several scenarios where asynchronous JMS communication must be converted to synchronous RFC call. We use modules in sender JMS adapter to achieve this:
JMS message (async) -> JMS sender channel's async-sync module -> XI (sync) -> sRFC -> XI (sync) -> JMS sender channel's sync-async module -> JMS receiver channel -> JMS message (async)
This works perfectly when everything is OK and even when some problems occur (JMS rollback is performed). But in case of any problem in receiver JMS channel the behavior is arguable: Message is already processed in target system, response is lost forever and request is rolled back to sender queue to be processed again!
The result is that message may be processed many times in the target system and the caller system does even never learn about it!
We have transactional behavior set in our sender JMS channel with QoS Exactly Once. This QoS is not kept in case of receiver channel problem.
SAP states that this is normal behavior of async-sync bridge implemented with modules (no-BPM way). But I think there should be normal asynchronous processing (some queue) used when the message is converted back to asynchronous form. Such message must never be lost in XI.
Has anybody similar experience with async-sync bridging behavior in XI?
Thanks
Tomas

This "How To" Wiki should help you with the parameters you will need in the JMS Adapter.
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/XI/HowTo...ContentconversionmodulewithJ2EEJMS+adapter
You can go to/from files with no problem, and you don't need the Business Process Engine.

Multiple Async/Sync bridge

Hi All,
I have read about single Async/Sync and Sync/Async bridges without using BPM. But my scenario is somthing where multiple Async/Sync bridges are required.
Here data will come in the form of an IDOC which is sent to a Oracle database server where we run a stored procedure and get one particular field 'xyz' which has to be updated to SAP R/3 system through a RFC. So it is something like:
IDOC->Oracle->RFC->SAP.
I have tried this using BPM, it is working fine. But because of performance issue, I would like to do it without using BPM. Can anybody please help me out in finding whether it is possible without BPM. If yes, then how?
Thanks
Jaya

Jaya,
There is no need for BPM in ur scenario. You just need to write UDF in ur mapping program and can fetch the data from ORACLE and pass it to RFC.
Please see /people/siva.maranani/blog/2005/08/23/lookup146s-in-xi-made-simpler
If you need any more info, let us know.
-raj.

JDBC Async-Sync bridge does not work

Hi folks.
I read the how to guide How To Realize a sync-async and async-sync bridge within the Adapter Framework and I found some tips at SDN (i.e File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19.) . So on, I created a scenario JDBC<=>SOAP.
My scenario:
1 JDBC adapter sends an async request to SOAP
2 SOAP creates an object in its system and then sends a sync confirmation response to the sender (async JDBC adapter Receiver)
Module Tab of JDBC Sender
Processing Sequence
AF_Modules/RequestResponseBean          1
CallSapAdapter                    2
AF_Modules/ResponseOnewayBean     3
Module Configuration
1 passThrough     true
3 adapterNamespace     http://sap.com/xi/XI/System
3 adapterType          JDBC
3 receiverChannel     JDBC_Object_Receiver
3 receiverService     Legacy_Service
The problem is the scenario works fine until an error is detected on communication channel (Receiver). Any kind of error, as communication problem, insert/update problem or procedure types problem. When this thing happens, communication channel (Sender) posts the next message and a persist error appears, like that
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="PERSIST">MSGGUID_EXISTING</SAP:Code>
<SAP:Stack>Message ID XXXX for pipeline CENTRAL, version already exists in system</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>N</SAP:Retry>
After this, all the next messages remain at "Processing started".
This persist error message becomes constant in the system. It is executed once an hour approximately.
I have already tried solving this problem deleting the adapter and recreated it again, but the behavior remains the same.
This is the SOAP Header Main
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SOAP:Envelope xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
- <SOAP:Header>
- <SAP:Main xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:wsu="http://www.docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd" versionMajor="003" versionMinor="000" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1" wsu:Id="wsuid-main-92ABE13F5C59AB7FE10000000A1551F7">
<SAP:MessageClass>SystemError</SAP:MessageClass>
<SAP:ProcessingMode>synchronous</SAP:ProcessingMode>
<SAP:MessageId>6F5A54B3-96DF-C744-8BF6-A4D4B9289C5D</SAP:MessageId>
<SAP:RefToMessageId>F6BC6270-D94A-11DB-B6D0-00188B40F2CF</SAP:RefToMessageId>
<SAP:TimeSent>2007-03-23T14:31:30Z</SAP:TimeSent>
- <SAP:Sender>
<SAP:Service />
<SAP:Interface namespace="" />
</SAP:Sender>
- <SAP:Receiver>
<SAP:Party agency="" scheme="" />
<SAP:Service>VUC</SAP:Service>
<SAP:Interface namespace="http://oesp0115/xi/webservices">Cliente_THOR_OB</SAP:Interface>
</SAP:Receiver>
<SAP:Interface namespace="http://oesp0115/xi/webservices">Cliente_THOR_OB</SAP:Interface>
</SAP:Main>
- <SAP:ReliableMessaging xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
<SAP:QualityOfService>BestEffort</SAP:QualityOfService>
</SAP:ReliableMessaging>
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="PERSIST">MSGGUID_EXISTING</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>F6BC6270D94A11DBB6D000188B40F2CF</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2>CENTRAL</SAP:P2>
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>Message ID F6BC6270D94A11DBB6D000188B40F2CF for pipeline CENTRAL, version already exists in system</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>N</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
- <SAP:HopList xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
- <SAP:Hop timeStamp="2007-03-23T14:31:30Z" wasRead="false">
<SAP:Engine type="AE">af.xid.oesp0115</SAP:Engine>
<SAP:Adapter namespace="http://sap.com/xi/XI/System">XIRA</SAP:Adapter>
<SAP:MessageId>F6BC6270-D94A-11DB-B6D0-00188B40F2CF</SAP:MessageId>
<SAP:Info />
</SAP:Hop>
- <SAP:Hop timeStamp="2007-03-23T14:31:30Z" wasRead="false">
<SAP:Engine type="IS">is.00.oesp0115</SAP:Engine>
<SAP:Adapter namespace="http://sap.com/xi/XI/System">XI</SAP:Adapter>
<SAP:MessageId>F6BC6270-D94A-11DB-B6D0-00188B40F2CF</SAP:MessageId>
<SAP:Info>3.0</SAP:Info>
</SAP:Hop>
</SAP:HopList>
- <SAP:RunTime xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<SAP:Date>20070323</SAP:Date>
<SAP:Time>113130</SAP:Time>
<SAP:Host>oesp0115</SAP:Host>
<SAP:SystemId>XID</SAP:SystemId>
<SAP:SystemNr>00</SAP:SystemNr>
<SAP:OS>Windows NT</SAP:OS>
<SAP:DB>DB6</SAP:DB>
<SAP:Language />
<SAP:ProcStatus>023</SAP:ProcStatus>
<SAP:AdapterStatus>000</SAP:AdapterStatus>
<SAP:User>PIAFUSER</SAP:User>
<SAP:TraceLevel>1</SAP:TraceLevel>
<SAP:Logging>1</SAP:Logging>
<SAP:LogSeqNbr>000</SAP:LogSeqNbr>
<SAP:RetryLogSeqNbr>000</SAP:RetryLogSeqNbr>
<SAP:PipelineIdInternal>SAP_CENTRAL</SAP:PipelineIdInternal>
<SAP:PipelineIdExternal>CENTRAL</SAP:PipelineIdExternal>
<SAP:PipelineElementId />
<SAP:PipelineService />
<SAP:QIdInternal />
<SAP:CommitActor>X</SAP:CommitActor>
<SAP:SplitNumber>0</SAP:SplitNumber>
<SAP:NumberOfRetries>0</SAP:NumberOfRetries>
<SAP:NumberOfManualRetries>0</SAP:NumberOfManualRetries>
<SAP:TypeOfEngine client="001">CENTRAL</SAP:TypeOfEngine>
<SAP:PlsrvExceptionCode />
<SAP:EOReferenceRuntime type="TID" />
<SAP:EOReferenceInbound type="TID" />
<SAP:EOReferenceOutbound type="TID" />
<SAP:MessageSizePayload>1304</SAP:MessageSizePayload>
<SAP:MessageSizeTotal>3744</SAP:MessageSizeTotal>
<SAP:PayloadSizeRequest>1304</SAP:PayloadSizeRequest>
<SAP:PayloadSizeRequestMap>0</SAP:PayloadSizeRequestMap>
<SAP:PayloadSizeResponse>0</SAP:PayloadSizeResponse>
<SAP:PayloadSizeResponseMap>0</SAP:PayloadSizeResponseMap>
<SAP:Reorganization>INI</SAP:Reorganization>
<SAP:AdapterOutbound>AENGINE</SAP:AdapterOutbound>
<SAP:InterfaceAction>INIT</SAP:InterfaceAction>
<SAP:RandomNumber>14</SAP:RandomNumber>
<SAP:AckStatus>000</SAP:AckStatus>
<SAP:SkipReceiverDetermination />
<SAP:Sender_Agreement_GUID>56A2F666C66538F48BCD76B50034F91C</SAP:Sender_Agreement_GUID>
</SAP:RunTime>
- <SAP:PerformanceHeader xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="ADAPTER_IN">INTEGRATION_ENGINE_HTTP_ENTRY</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="oesp0115">20070323143130.699</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="ADAPTER_IN">INTEGRATION_ENGINE_HTTP_ENTRY</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="end" host="oesp0115">20070323143130.714</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="CORE">INTEGRATION_ENGINE</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="oesp0115">20070323143130.714</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="CORE">INTEGRATION_ENGINE</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="end" host="oesp0115">20070323143130.714</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="CORE">INTEGRATION_ENGINE</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="end" host="oesp0115">20070323143130.87</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
</SAP:PerformanceHeader>
- <SAP:Diagnostic xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
<SAP:TraceLevel>Information</SAP:TraceLevel>
<SAP:Logging>Off</SAP:Logging>
</SAP:Diagnostic>
- <SAP:Trace xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
<Trace level="1" type="T">Party normalization: sender</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender scheme external = XIParty</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender agency external = http://sap.com/xi/XI</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender party external =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender party normalized =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Party normalization: receiver</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver scheme external =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver agency external =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver party external =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver party normalized =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_HTTP_HANDLER-HANDLE_REQUEST" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">XMB was called with URL /sap/xi/engine?type=entry</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">COMMIT is done by XMB !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-ENTER_XMS" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-SET_START_PIPELINE" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMBCONF-SXMB_GET_XMB_USE" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_TROUBLESHOOT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">XMB entry processing</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = XID</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 001</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = PIAFUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2007-03-23T14:31:30Z BRAZIL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_UC_EXECUTE">
<Trace level="1" type="T">Message-GUID = F6BC6270D94A11DBB6D000188B40F2CF</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">PLNAME = CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">QOS = BE</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="interface activity determination">
<Trace level="1" type="T">Version 000</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Message status 000</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Interface action INIT</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">(must be INIT for a new determination)</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Message type BEST EFFORT. -> No determination</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Set interface action INIT into *MAST*</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="interface activity determination">
<Trace level="1" type="T">Version 000</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Message status 000</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Interface action INIT</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">(must be INIT for a new determination)</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Message type BEST EFFORT. -> No determination</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Set interface action INIT into *MAST*</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">SystemError message generated. Guid: 6F5A54B396DFC7448BF6A4D4B9289C5D</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Error during execution of message : F6BC6270D94A11DBB6D000188B40F2CF</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">ApplicationMessage was (=RefToMsgId): F6BC6270D94A11DBB6D000188B40F2CF</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="interface activity determination">
<Trace level="1" type="T">Version 000</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Message status 000</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Interface action INIT</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">(must be INIT for a new determination)</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Message type BEST EFFORT. -> No determination</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Set interface action INIT into MAST</Trace>
</Trace>
</SAP:Trace>
</SOAP:Header>
- <SOAP:Body>
<SAP:Manifest xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:wsu="http://www.docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd" wsu:Id="wsuid-manifest-5CABE13F5C59AB7FE10000000A1551F7" />
</SOAP:Body>
</SOAP:Envelope>
Someone can help me?
Regards
Rafael

Hey Rafael,
I've heard of ur problem by Carol Garcia.
I still think the problem was related to the fact that you were commiting the work at JDBC adapter, even though your DB (it was Oracle, right?) supports internal commit. I do aggree that this scenario should work for non-commiting DBs, though. Thus it is a bug, and the note is relevant.
Anyway, did you try to commit the work at DB side? I think it should have resolved your case (even though the bug would still exist, but it would not impact you).
Regards,
Henrique.

Proxy-Soap-Jdbc Async/Sync Bridge

Hi,
I have proxy soap requestsoap response-jdbc syncronous scenario. i have used async/Sync bridge for that.
I m getting NO_RECEIVER_CASE_ASYNC, No receiver could be determined error.
I have created :
2 Datatype for proxy sender and jdbc receiver and 2 MT
6 Service interface :
        one abastract syncronous for proxy sender and jdbc receiver
        one abstract asyncronus for proxy sender
        one outbound asyncrous for proxy sender
        one abstract asyncronus for jdbc receiver
        one inbound asysncronus for jdbc receiver
        one abstract syncronous for SOAP request and response
2 message mapping for request and response
1 operation mapping using abastract syncronous for proxy sender and jdbc receiver with   abstract syncronous for SOAP request and response
BPM steps
two container request and response
receiver- send1- send2
receiver for asyncrous and file request
send1 for syncrouns for request and response
send2 for asyncrouns response.
Activated the IR.
ID Part.
Imported BPM from Design and created two business component one for SOAP receiver and one for proxy sender and jdbc receiver.
Created 3 Reciver Determination as proxy sender to bpm, bpm to soap, bpm to jdbc receiver.
Created 3 IInterface Determination as proxy sender to bpm, bpm to soap, bpm to jdbc receiver.
Created 2 Receiver Agreement as bpm to soap, bpm to jdbc receiver
Activated and run the proxy . in sxmb_moni i m getthing No receiver could be determined error.
I have checked the BPM ,No semantic errors found.
cleared the cache with sxi_cache and full refresh url.
Please suggest me with above details.
Regards
Laxmi Bhushan Jha

like in operation mapping we have abstract syncronous interface which has proxy as sender and jdbc as response
receiver to SOAP reuest and response...
Either of us seem to be confused!
This is your scenario (as per my understanding)
Receive (Proxy_message) --> Transformation --> Send (Mode = Sync...SOAP message) --> Transformation --> Send (mode = Async..JDBC req)
If the requirement is correctly understood by me then:
You should have one ASYNC-Outbound and ASYNC-Abstract interface for your Proxy-side.....proxy to be developed on the ASYNC-Out interface.
You should have a SYNC-ABS and SYNC-IN interface for SOAP req and resp.
You should have one ASYNC-IN and ASYNC-ABS interface for your JDBC side.
Mapping to be developed between PROXY_Async and SOAP_Req_Async & SOAP_Resp_Async and JDBC_Async.
Regards,
Abhishek.

Sync/Async and Async/Sync Bridge in JMS Adapter

Hi,
I have scenarios using both the Sync/Async and the Async/Sync Bridge in the JMS Adapter. In general this works fine. There is just one thing that caught my attention.
In the Sync/Async Bridge, the correlation in JMS is done
JMS Message ID of Reqeust --> JMS Correlation ID of Response
In the Async/Sync Bridge, it is done
JMS Correlation ID of Request --> JMS Correlation ID of Response
which seems strange as I would have expected to work the same for both ways...
I'm following exactly the setup described in the 'How-to correlate JMS' guide.
Has anybody experienced the same thing or am I missing something important here?
thanks for your help
regards,
Peter

Hi,
If I get it right the MQ queue gives a response message back to XI. The message looks okay on MQ queue, but in XI it's empty.
So I guess the problem must be within the channel that picks it from MQ queue. Did you configure any modules in it that might screw up the content? Is the the message empty as soon as it arrives in XI adapter engine? Pls. check in RWB Monitoring or End-to-End monitoring.
Do you have other channels that pick up messages from that or another MQ queue which do not show such an error? Are they configured exactly the same way?
Regards,
Kai

Async/Sync Bridge with SOAP response

Hi All
I have a interface that uses BPM for async/sync bridge(SOAP->RFC->IDOC). I now need to change this to send response back to he webservice.
Any ideas on how to achieve this?
Regards

avoid the BPM.
just do a simple SOAP to RFC scenario here - Walkthrough - SOAP XI RFC/BAPI

Doubt on Aync-Sync Bridge without BPM

I created a scenario using Aync-Sync Bridge without BPM:
File(Asyn) => Rfc:BAPI_PO_CREATE1(Syn)
1 which mode of message interface should be used in IR for File(Asyn)?
Asyn or Syn?
2 if syn MSG interface should be used in the above question,how can i return BAPI_PO_CREATE1.response which includes PO number to the sender?
BTW:I had maintained the modules and their parameters(AF_Modules/RequestResponseBean and AF_Modules/ResponseOnewayBean)
in RFC CC.
Regards
Ming

Hi,
1) You have to use synchronous interface.
2) There will two message mappings(one request and one response) and one interface mapping between synchronous interface.
3) All the corresponding modules should ve added in File sender communication channel not in RFC CC.
Regards,
Sudheer
Message was edited by:
Sudheer

Questions async-sync bridge with JMS

Hi all
SAP recommends using JMS rather than BPM to make async-sync bridge or sync-sync bridge. But how to use it in real life?
For example, I have an async RFC function to call a sync SOAP function and the sync response should be passed to a mail receiver. I know how to use BPM to achieve this scenario. But how should we use JMS or can we use JMS to do the same thing?
Another question: If we use SAP own JMS service to make async-sync scenario, we need a sender JMS adapter and a receiver JMS adapter. Are the sender and receiver connected to the same queue in JMS or different queues?
Thanks!
Regards,
Hui

Hi Hui!!
have a look in these Url's
<b>sync/Sync Bridge in the Sender JMS Adapter</b>
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/45/20d251c20a0732e10000000a155369/frameset.htm
You can get some idea on these links also
/people/sriram.vasudevan3/blog/2005/01/11/demonstrating-use-of-synchronous-asynchronous-bridge-to-integrate-synchronous-and-asynchronous-systems-using-ccbpm-in-sap-xi - Use of Synch - Asynch bridge in ccBPM
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] - Use of Synch - Asynch bridge in ccBPM
Go thru following Weblogs:
1.Walkthrough with BPM:- /people/krishna.moorthyp/blog/2005/06/09/walkthrough-with-bpm
2./people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/11/xi-how-to-retrieve-messageid-from-a-bpm
3./people/ravikumar.allampallam/blog/2005/02/17/bridging-the-sync-async-bridge-with-fork-xi
4.https://www.sdn.sap.com/sdn/weblogs.sdn?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
<b>Sync/Async communication in JMS adapter without BPM</b>
/people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2007/01/18/syncasync-communication-in-jms-adapter-without-bpm-sp19
this thead also
Async/sync bridge

Async/Sync Bridge JMS/File

Hello,
An Async/Sync Bridge with usage of the JMS adapter is described in several blogs. Is there a chance to use the JMS Adapter as a sender system and a File Adapter as the receiver system in such a scenario?
Any suggestions are appreciated.
Peter

This "How To" Wiki should help you with the parameters you will need in the JMS Adapter.
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/XI/HowTo...ContentconversionmodulewithJ2EEJMS+adapter
You can go to/from files with no problem, and you don't need the Business Process Engine.

Multi response for Async/Sync bridge.

Hi everyone!
We have a scenario with Async/Sync Bridge. It is JDBC-BAPI-JDBC. So it uses 3 communication channels. Sender/Receiver for JDBC and Receiver for BAPI.
Now we need to modify scenario so that it will send BAPI response not only to JDBC but also to E-mail. Is it possible to acheive without BPM? And if it is possible than how? Any idea would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Andrei

>Now we need to modify scenario so that it will send BAPI response not only to JDBC but also to E-mail. Is it possible to acheive without BPM? And if it is possible than how? Any idea would be greatly appreciated.
One way to avoid BPM for this situation is use UDF in the response and send mail using UDF. This way in addition to JDBC response you can also do sending email. But downside is u will lose email monitoring..
explore this link .....
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=90570965

Is there Async-Sync bridge in BPM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for