Is there solution to block user to adopt a Purchase Requsition to PO twice

Hi All,
Please advice. How can we block user to adopt a PR twice. In other words, let say user A have a PR number 3xxxxxxx then user A adopt this PR no to PO and get PO no 5xxxxxxx with status hold because of an error. In the next day another user B adopt the same PR no to PO and get another PO no 5xxxxxxx1 .
My question is ...
is there any solution / bapi to block another user to adopt the same PR when a PO already created even the status in held.
Thank you.
Nies

their is no standard process for hold PO you have to do it by enhansment take help from ABAP guy
regards

Similar Messages

Blocking User to change the "Configure Columns"

Hi,
I have a folder which is "Files" views
Is there any to block User to change "Configure Columns" in folder option?
Thanks

cityec,
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
- Visit http://support.novell.com and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
the other self support options and support programs available.
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
correct newsgroup. (http://forums.novell.com)
Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
http://forums.novell.com/faq.php
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
http://forums.novell.com/

How to Block user from Sending IM or Hide Presence of there user who is not in his department

Hi All,
How to Block user from Sending IM or Hide Presence of there user who is not in his department.
Thank you

Hi Jp,
Method 1:
You can use the Enhanced Privacy Mode in Lync 2013
<section class="ocpSection">
Enable Privacy Mode
By default, everyone except Blocked Contacts can see your presence status. To modify the privacy settings, you can do the following:
In the Lync main window, click the Options button.
In the Lync - Options dialog box, click Status, and then do one of the following:
Click I want everyone to be able to see my presence regardless of system settings (override default settings).
Click I want the system administrator to decide - currently everyone can see my presence but this could change in the future.
</section>
About Enhanced Privacy Mode
If your organization has enabled Enhanced Privacy Mode in Lync, you can choose whether to limit visibility of your presence information to only those people you’ve added to your Contacts list. You do that by selecting one of the following on the
Options->Status window:
I want everyone to be able to see my presence
I only want people in my Contacts list to see my presence
Method 2:
Using Privacy Relationship, you can block a particular user by adding him to blocked contacts
Anil Kumar (MCITP)
Note: Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and/or fitness for a particular purpose.

Block users from Home Hub 3 wi-fi without them kno...

Is there any way on the homehub 3 to block users on the wifi without it giving them a notification?
When you use the parental lock down between certain times when the user opens a web page it says they've been locked down by the hub but I don't want them to get this notification just to be completly disconnected?

Neogeo wrote:
Is there any way on the homehub 3 to block users on the wifi without it giving them a notification?
When you use the parental lock down between certain times when the user opens a web page it says they've been locked down by the hub but I don't want them to get this notification just to be completly disconnected?
No, you cannot do that with the home hub 3.
There are some useful help pages here, for BT Broadband customers only, on my personal website.
BT Broadband customers - help with broadband, WiFi, networking, e-mail and phones.

IM34, IMCCP1, IMCCP3 . How to block user not run these tcodes twice

Hi All,
I have plan value from cjr2 (cost element and activity type)
Normally we use IM34 (to roll up) the plan value then to copy plan value to investment management (imccp1) and copy plan to project budget (imccp3).
How to block user to run these tcodes twice. It seems that if user run it twice, the total plan and budget will be double. Is there any way to reverse?
PLz help...
Cheers,
Nies

thx

How can l block users from backing dating transactions

1. How can l block users from back dating transactions in SAP B1. It was discovered that, in production dept there is this allowance given to them to keep producing for the previous month in the new month; this according to line staff is to enable them meet up their monthly target, after a meeting with the management it was resolved to block that right of backdation of enteries. how can l correct this.
2. How can l change the decimal places backward in the general settings of administration of SAP B1( iniatially it was set to be 5 under Quantity now want to correct it to 3 how do l go about this).
Joel

Joel,
By forum rule, one question for one thread. I will answer you the second: If you are using 2007 version, the option to decrease decimal place is not available. Check this thread to know more:
Re: REDUCE NUMBER OF DECIMAL PLACES
Also note: this forum is just for B1 system administration. Please post it on the main forum.
Thanks,
Gordon

Trigger for blocking user using third party tool !

Dear Friends ,
I have to block the users from using sqlplus, TOAD, PLsldev etc (Except SYSTEM user) from client end using the below trigger :
create or replace trigger check_logon
after logon on database
declare
cursor c_check is
select
sys_context('userenv','session_user')
username,
s.module,
s.program
from v$session s
where
sys_context('userenv','sessionid')=s.audsid;
lv_check c_check%rowtype;
begin
open c_check;
fetch c_check into lv_check;
if lv_check.username in ('SYSTEM')
then
null;
elsif upper(lv_check.module) like
('%SQL*PLUS%') or
upper(lv_check.program) like
('%SQLPLUS%') or
upper(lv_check.module) like
('%T.O.A.D%') or
upper(lv_check.program) like
('%TOAD%')    or
upper(lv_check.program) like
('%PLSQLDEV%')    or
upper(lv_check.program) like
('%BUSOBJ%')    or
upper(lv_check.program) like
('%EXCEL%')
then
close c_check;
raise_application_error(-
20100,'Banned! Contact with Database Admin!');
end if;
close c_check;
end;
It works fine all normal user cannot access the database using above third party tools .
But the problem is , user with DBA privileges can access the database with generating an trace file . Is there any way to restrict DBA Privileged user ? or is there any mechanism to create a log/trace file so that If there any DBA Privilege user acess to the Database , then we can get the information from that specified log/trace file ?
Waiting your kind reply ... ...

Hi,
If the DBA users has the DBA role granted to them so they will by passes the logon trigger. For example, the SYSTEM user has the DBA role and the DBA role has the ADMINISTER DATABASE TRIGGER privilege. The ADMINISTER DATABASE TRIGGER by pass the logon trigger. If you want to restrict the access to a DBA user, then you need to revoke the ADMINISTER DATABASE TRIGGER privilege from the DBA role or grant individual privileges except the ADMINISTER DATABASE TRIGGER privilege to the DBA users.
Cheers
Legatti

ISE, WLC: web auth, blocking user account

Hello!
We are implementing BYOD concept with ISE (1.1.4) and WLC 5508 (7.4.100).
On WLC there is SSID(WLAN) with MAC filtering without L2 security. For authentication user is redirected to the ISE Guest Portal.
Credentials are created at the ISE sponsor portal.
We create user account in ISE sponsor portal with one hour lease.
In 10 minutes we delete (or block) user credentials.
In spite of it the user is still able to work. Even if we manually disconnect client and reconnect it again, client opens the browser and there is no redirection to the ISE web auth page.
This happens because WLC thinks, that client is still associated.
There are session and idle timeout timers in WLC WLAN, but they can't solve the problem of automatic client session removing.
From my point of you, ISE must send some kind of reauth request to the user after account deletion, to make user authentication impossible .
In practice, ISE doesn't tell wlc or user, that client sesssion is blocked.
How the user account blocking process can be automated without manually deleting the client session from WLC client database?

It seems that there is some bug about CoA when deleting Guest accounts
CSCuc82135
Guests need to be removed from the network on Suspend/Delete/Expiration
When a guest user is deleted from the system, the RADIUS sessions associated with that guest user still exists.
Workaround Reissue the Change of Authorization using the session information from Monitoring reports for the sessions associated with that guest user.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.1.1/release_notes/ise111_rn.html#wp411891
from BUG Toolkit there is Release-Pending in "Fixed-in" option.

Block user logon in CI

Hi
We have scenario where we have CI and 2 application servers. We want users to login only to applications servers. For this, we have created logon groups and configured users' GUI accordingly. The problem is some users directly give sapgui <CI> command in RUN command and get connected to CI. How can I avoid this? Is there any way by which I can block users login directly to CI?
Thanks
Javed

The problem is some users directly give sapgui <CI> command in RUN command and get connected to CI
You cannot avoid users connecting if they have the right to logon directly to the system... replace their SAPLogon to SAPLogon Pad so they cannot create or modify entries or Educate them with the reason why is wrong to logon directly to the CI.
Regards
Juan

Blocked user accessing log in screen

Hello all
I have the EA4500 router with cisco connect cloud, must say this router is great for limiting kids online.
1 question I have however is the ability for a blocked user (internet access block) that is redirected to the cisco web site and presented with a log in screen. Is there anyway I can disable this becuase the kids stay up all night trying to figure out the password to log in, I just want it to say internet access blocked with no option for logging in for the blocked user.

This is could be how they designed that feature to work. I agree with jaymay
I believe that I can make it

How to block user create personal view and select ALL VIEW?

How to block user create personal view and select ALL VIEW?

Hello,
>create personal view
To restrict creating personal view, you need to modify your existing permission level or create new one. Login with admin account to your site and open role.aspx page (http://siteurl/_layouts/role.aspx). Then click on existing permission or add new permission
level-->and move to "Personal Permissions" section-->uncheck "Manage Personal Views - Create, change, and delete personal views of lists" option. Later you can assign this permission to all users, whom you don't want
to allow to create.
>and select ALL VIEW
Since SP does not supports view level permission directly so you have to use custom solution or use below designer solution to restrict user to open any view.
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/433486/How-to-set-view-level-permissions-out-of-the-box-i
Hope it could help
Hemendra:Yesterday is just a memory,Tomorrow we may never see
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help

Block users not to be able to save objects as $tmp (local object)

Hi,
We don't want any user to save their changes to a local object ($tmp) in the process of creating a change request.
Is there any way to block users from using this? Please help.
Thanks
Vijay

Hi Vijay,
As per my understanding, $tmp usage cannot be blocked completely.
Its usage can be restricted by using the authorization object S_DEVELOP as per the Note 395937.
I think this should be relevant for your requirement.
Regards,
Srikishan

Messages from blocked user

Hello.
I'd like to ask the reason: I've blocked a person. But we're in a group chat and even if he's blocked, I still can see his messages and he can see the mine in the group. Why? What can I do?
Thanks, L.

[11:36:59 PM] <withheld>: ahhaahhahahaha
[11:37:14 PM] <withheld>: you thought you could get away from me
[11:37:16 PM] <withheld>: hahaha
[11:37:20 PM] <withheld>: trolling
[11:37:22 PM] <withheld>: spame
[11:37:24 PM] <withheld>: ala'l;kdf
[11:37:24 PM] <withheld>: a'
[11:37:24 PM] <withheld>: dfkas'
^ This. This is what happens when a person wants to spam you. This is what happens when you block someone, and they still know how to add you to a group. And once you're added to that group, they can spam you from that group. This is what happens when Skype doesn't block incoming messages from blocked users in groups.
... There's more, by the way. It's not as short as that. I've got months worth of logs of this, spamming me from different groups, and endlessly just creating new groups and adding me and messaging me then disbanding only to create anew. My "Recent" tab doesn't work anymore, as there's constant harrassment, and as much as I "block", the spam continues in groups. Well #@^& done, Skype; it's like "Blocked" doesn't even exist. I would seriously like to see a change or two to the application's Group functions to stop people like this. Each of them has been warned that police will soon be involved for harrassment, but it doesn't seem Skype wants to make a change to stop it...

Blocking Users from Posting

Hi,
We are auditing this company and we noted that there are three dormant company codes. They became dormant because these companies were already dissolved and liquidated. Currently. these three are set to non-productive.
My question is: Is there a way to block users, who have access to all company codes, from posting to these company codes? I was hoping maybe there is some configuration that will prevent the users from posting any transaction to these company codes. We don't want to clean up the roles since this is a big exercise.
Appreciate if you can help me on this matter.
Thanks in advance.

Post it in Netweaver--- security forum.
For your question..I think it can be done through configuration...If there is no existing company code..how can they post?

Blocking Users from Commenting

Is there a way to block users from posting comments on a blog? We have generic accounts for a labs and our students have figured out that they can login using the generic account and post a comment. Then another user can login sing the same generic account and read the comment even if it is not been moderated. They are using it like a chat system.
Simply put can we create a "blacklist" of users for the service which would prevent the students from posting as a user. They would still post as anonymous users.

Hi Vittal,
use the user-exit described in note: 808971 (RSWUWFML2).
If you had several users changing dynamically I would create a z_ table for those users and select all in the exit.
The other way would be to allocate to the users a dummy email adress...but this is surely not so great.
Regards
Tibor

Is there solution to block user to adopt a Purchase Requsition to PO twice

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for