Is this image capable of supporting SSH V2? flash:c2800nm-spservicesk9-mz.124-17a.bin

I ran a batch job on a certain group of routers trying to enable SSH V2 on them, some of them came back successfully and others replied when I ran the command "sh ip ssh" with "SSH Enabled - version 1.99". Even though this is a K9 image, is it only capable of supprting SSH V2 or where might I find a doc which might be able to show me what images are c\apable of supporting ssh v2? Thanks guys

Can I ask, is it a rock solid rule that an image that doesn't contain "K9" in it is incapable of supporting SSH? Also is there a feature navigator tool for hardware devices? That is to say is there a tool out there that will tell me what IOS's a hardware device is capable of running? For example let's say I need to see if a VG 202 is capable of running a K9 image is there a look up tool out there which would help me ascertain this infor mation? I can't seem to find one. Thanks so much for your help so far!

Similar Messages

Ios image support ssh

hello dear
please can you tell me that the image ((c2960-lanbase-mz.122-53.SE1.bin)) support the ssh or no??
if no what ios image can i load for the switch 2960G to support the ssh.
thanks

Hello sajjad_m1987,
c2960-lanbase-mz.122-53.SE1.bin does not support ssh.
You'll need the crypto image, which has the k9 in the name.
c2960-lanbasek9-mz.122-52.SE.bin
You can go to the following link to search for the ios that supports the feature that is needed.
http://tools.cisco.com/ITDIT/CFN/jsp/by-feature-technology.jsp
Hope this helps,
if so, please rate.

CMNS support is not present in this image

Hi,
We are using a C1721 router to connect a X25 line to an ethernet port. We need to enable CMNS and we get the following error:
GDM_Cisco#configure terminal
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
GDM_Cisco(config)#interface fastethernet0
GDM_Cisco(config-if)#cmns enable
CMNS support is not present in this image
This is the device information:
GDM_Cisco>show hardware
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) C1700 Software (C1700-ADVSECURITYK9-M), Version 12.3(15), RELEASE SOFTW
ARE (fc3)
Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Copyright (c) 1986-2005 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Tue 24-May-05 21:33 by ssearch
Image text-base: 0x8000816C, data-base: 0x81012AF4
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(7r)XM2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
ROM: C1700 Software (C1700-ADVSECURITYK9-M), Version 12.3(15), RELEASE SOFTWARE
(fc3)
Any help would be useful.
Regards,
Fernando L

Dear sir, you should throw cisco from the top of the mountain !
ilker

This image cannot be rendered for editing because Aperture does not support

Editing Error: This image cannot be rendered for editing because Aperture does not support the image format.
I have been having this issue when trying to open photos in CS4. It only seems to be affecting images from the last year or so, although I'm using the same cameras (Canon 7D, 5D, and S90) as before. My library is large, going back to year 2000, and all the older images seem to work fine, but most all of the recent files display this error when trying to open them is CS4. I've tried the methods described in other threads and on the support website, namely starting aperture while holding option and command, pulling up the options to rebuild the library in various ways. I've done all three options, the last two twice, with no change. This is very frustrating to not be able to use the program in the way I had planned... Any ideas? I'm wondering if my library is simply too large- although I'm not sure if breaking the library into smaller chunks is the best way to go. I prefer having all my photos together. I have found that iMovie fails to operate properly when events get too large. Is this a similar problem?

Again, thanks for the input. As for the first suggestion, when I import without renaming they all work, but as of late, all appear to work no problem. It seems like it was a block of time from roughly October 2009 through November 2010 where most all the files imported during this date demonstrate the problem. As for the second suggestion, I've tried both 8 and 16 bit TIFF and PSD file types selected in the editor preferences, with no luck.
My next move has been to relocate the offending files out of their current location to another location (they are referenced, not managed). In doing this, I encountered what seems to be a file access or privelege error message, although about 20% of the files were moved, and in doing so, it seems to have solved the problem for those. But I don't have a good way of isolating the involved images outside of Aperture, and I don't want to move them with Finder anyways since that would ruin the referencing.
This bug is getting so complicated I'm ready to throw my hands in the air and just go back to Lightroom. Aperture has so much potential, especially in regards to integration with ipods, iPads, other Macs, etc. but in the 4 months I've been using it, I have spent WAY more time addressing buggy issues like this one than the amount of time supposedly saved using Aperture instead of Lightroom.

I have a slightly out of date imac G5 , i went to apple store and was told i could updrade from os x 10.5 to 10.6, so i have this on delivery to me, now im being told my mac isnt capable of supporting 10.6... have i wasted my money ?

i have a slightly out of date imac G5 , i went to apple store and was told i could updrade from os x 10.5 to 10.6, so i have this on delivery to me, now im being told my mac isnt capable of supporting 10.6... have i wasted my money

it just says 2GHz power pc G5
i hope the apple store online do refunds.....
also now my iphone 5 will have to remain music-less as i cannot install the latest version of itunes...
wonder why the man in the apple store didnt ask me this when i said i had a G5 .. he just said if you have 10.5.8 you can install 10.6

Does 12.1 support ssh in 2950 and 3550

Hi,
We have 2950 and 3550 switches running IOS version 12.1
In this version can we implement ssh access?
Regards
SKRAO

Hi Rao,
The following images support SSH on 2950 24 switches.
12.1(22)EA9
12.1 doesn't support SSH for 3550 24 switches.The following images support SSH on 3550 24 switches.
12.2SEE
12.2SED
12.2SEB
Hope it helps you.
Thanks,
satish

Does 3650 Mgmt Interface (Gi0/0) support SSH ?

Does anyone know if the WS-C3650-48PD supports (or not) SSH over the MGMT interface (Gi0/0) ?
I have it working with Telnet and the switch is configured with SSH enabled.
I can use SSH if I use in-band management (configure the switch IP on a VLAN interface instead of on the Gi0/0 interface), but when I try to open a SSH session over the MGMT interface I get "Connection refused" in my SSH client.
Is there something extra I need to do to make SSH work over MGMT ?
vrf definition Mgmt-vrf
address-family ipv4
exit-address-family
address-family ipv6
exit-address-family
ip ssh time-out 60
ip ssh authentication-retries 5
ip ssh logging events
ip ssh version 2
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
vrf forwarding Mgmt-vrf
ip address 172.28.26.95 255.255.255.0
negotiation auto
ip route vrf Mgmt-vrf 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.28.26.1
line vty 0 4
access-class 1 in
exec-timeout 50 0
password 7 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
logging synchronous
login local
length 0
transport input telnet ssh
escape-character 3
Normally I would use "transport input ssh" - ie. no telnet - but this is the only way I've been able to use the MGMT interface so far and I'd rather not be using Telnet at all.
Thanks
David

Quicker than expected - quiet morning so far ;-)
#sh ip ssh
SSH Enabled - version 2.0
Authentication timeout: 60 secs; Authentication retries: 5
Minimum expected Diffie Hellman key size : 1024 bits
IOS Keys in SECSH format(ssh-rsa, base64 encoded):
ssh-rsa xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...
I checked the SSH traffic from my client - I send SYN, get back RST - definitely an active refusal of the connection.
If MGMT Gi0/0 does support SSH, it's clear I'm missing something to enable it.
IOS is Cisco's current recommended for this platform and in the recommended installation mode
Switch Ports Model SW Version SW Image Mode
* 1 52 WS-C3650-48PD 03.03.05SE cat3k_caa-universalk9 INSTALL
If I move the management IP address off Gi0/0 and onto the management VLAN interface (management is then through Gi1/1/1 where the VLAN is trunked), it works fine and I can SSH to the switch with no other changes to the configuration (of course subsequently I want to disable Telnet)
I know can eliminate patching and routing/forwarding of the traffic as issues given Telnet and PING can reach the management IP address under both configurations. It's as if the MGMT interface just doesn't allow SSH by default (or possibly not at all)
If you have a working configuration you'd be happy to share, I'd appreciate it.
Thanks again
David

IOS that supports SSH

Hi guys,
I am using L3 4506 switch with the IOS Version 12.2(18)EW3. I want to upgrade the IOS which supports SSH. Can any one suggest the latest IOS version that supports SSH for 4506 switch.
Thanks
Rajesh

Thanks Prame...
The Supervisor Engine that we have is Supervisor IV.
For your better understanding i have attached the output below.
Switch#sh ver
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) Catalyst 4000 L3 Switch Software (cat4000-I9S-M), Version 12.2(18)EW3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Copyright (c) 1986-2005 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Mon 07-Feb-05 19:21 by hqluong
Image text-base: 0x00000000, data-base: 0x010BFA78
ROM: 12.2(20r)EW1
Dagobah Revision 95, Swamp Revision 29
swsyd0501 uptime is 2 hours, 47 minutes
System returned to ROM by reload
System image file is "bootflash:"
cisco WS-C4506 (MPC8245) processor (revision 7) with 524288K bytes of memory.
Processor board ID FOX094203G6
Last reset from Reload
8 Virtual Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s)
48 FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s)
56 Gigabit Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s)
403K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
Configuration register is 0x2101
I think this will help to suggest me for a better IOS version which support SSH.
Thanks
Rajesh

Adobe Acrobat Message : ''To view the flash technology content in this PDF, please install the version of flash player that supports Adobe reader and acrobat "

I am using interop acrobat dll in one of my client , when trying to open a pdf file in acrobat X the following message appears :
''To view the flash technology content in this PDF, please install the version of flash player that supports Adobe reader and acrobat "
Is there any workaround to fix this issue ?...
will installing the flash player fix the issue ?
thanks

i am trying to convert the pdf to tiff image using
//Using ACROBAT PRO
AcroAppClass app = new AcroAppClass();
AcroAVDoc doc = new AcroAVDocClass();
i tried downloading the flash player ,now the error does not appear but for those pdf that displays this flash message error i am not getting the pdf converted to tiff file , instead i get an image with message
What could be the cause of this issue ?

Editing Error - This Image cannot be rendered for editing...

Editing Error - This Image cannot be rendered for editingbecause Aperture doesn't support the image format.
Thats the message that appears when I'm exporting to Photoshop CS5 (I tried CS4 too), or even other Plug-ins such as Silver Efex Pro...
That had never happened before, and I use Aperture for over 2 years.
Its RAW image format from the same camera and all, nothing has changed. just randomly decided not to export anymore to other programs, Regular exporting works, so it's nothing to do with exporting it self, but the communication between aperture and other softwares, I think.
I've seen some other people having the same problem, does anyone have a take on it, in how to solve this? I can't edit anymore outside of aperture. (of course not including the idea of exporting and doing everything away from aperture, which is totally not viable with the amount of content to be edited and not being in aperture anymore.)
I've tried deleting the preferences, tried repair permissions of the Library, and still didn't work.
Didn't go to the other 2 options (repair and rebuild database) because it would take days if chosen, and still not sure that would solve. or if has anything to do with.
Any light anyone?

What kind of file is it? (i.e.jpeg, Canon RAW, Nikon RAW etc..)
As a workaround until you get the issue fixed, why not reimport the image from the original file, lift and stamp any adjustments you've made in Aperture, and see if the same problem occurs?
A

TS3938 I have a problem with the CD player plays some species, others give me this letter no longer supported PowerPC

I have a problem with the CD player plays some species, others give me this letter no longer supported PowerPC

Educational software suffers from having been written many years ago, but the financial market is not such to give the publisher much incentive to update the software.
The problem for you is that Top Notch 2 with ActiveBook was written and released by Pearson back when Macs utilized the PowerPC CPU platform. In 2006, Apple migrated the Macs to Intel CPUs, but released their Operating Systems with an invisible translation program, Rosetta, so that the user could continue to use their existing library of PowerPC applications and take time to update them as needed.
The problem arises in that Apple no longer continues to update Rosetta for inclusion in Lion and now Mountain Lion, so that your CD-ROM cannot be executed on your Lion Mac.
Since Pearson looks unlikely to rewrite and release an Intel version of Top Notch 2, you must find a workaround that will play your CD-ROM and allow you to continue utilizing your ActiveBook.
You do not indicate which model of Mac you are using. If you upgraded it to Lion from Snow Leopard, you have these workarounds:
1. Revert to Snow Leopard
2. Partition your hard drive or add an external hard drive and install Snow Leopard into it. This will allow you to "dual-boot" into Snow Leopard when you need access to run Top Notch 2. You would then have to "dual-boot" back into Lion when you needed access to those features required by Lion.
If you purchased a new Mac that came with Lion, you only have one workaround available to run Top Notch 2:
3. Install Snow Leopard (with Rosetta) into Parallels
[click on image to enlarge]
There is an easier way to run your Top Notch 2 in Parallels if cost is not a significant factor for you. You must purchase Snow Leopard Server from a third party souce, such as eBay, which when sold by Apple was $499 or more. I now see that it can be purchased on eBay for as little as $51. Parallels allows for easy installation of Snow Leopard Server into Parallels.
If cost is a factor, then use the link above the photo to follow my instructions on how to install Snow Leopard client ($19.99 from Apple) into Parallels and achieve the same result.
Lastly, you could purchase a used Mac that will allow Snow Leopard to be the boot OS X installed (wth the optional Rosetta installed). But this seems like an expensive alternative just to run one piece of software; and subject to hardware failure without notice or recourse.

320PPI 5cm x 5cm , and the mobile app that this image appear runs on a mobile phone of 200ppi disp

IF I DO AN IMAGE in FW or PS of 320PPI 5cm x 5cm , and the mobile app that this image appear runs on a mobile phone of 200ppi display resolution, then resolution seem of image should be 200ppi ... in other words should adapt automatically????

Only if you were to measure the physical dimentions. (Using physical dimentions and changing the ppi would add or remove pixels)
inches X ppi = pixels
A 1200 x 1600 pixel image will be the same on all devices that share that ratio, the ppi difference comes into play when the phyical size of the screen is changed.
Technically the quality never changed only the zoom changed.
When designing a screen at 1200x1600 (example) That image will fit on any screen that has that spec.
The ratio plays a role when only 1 of the 2 pixel dimentions changes (width or the height).
On larger screens, the ppi is lower to equal the same number of pixels. So when a device can support a higher resolution, the ppi is increased on the same size screen.
Knowing that, having the specs of the device will tell you the maximum number of pixels that screen can display.
Therefore, when designing a screen, always start with the largest resolution (pixel dimmentions) first, then downsample to the next size screen and so on.
The reason is simple, it is easier to remove pixels, then it is to add them later, as photoshop or any other software does not know what should be there.
BTW, this is also the reason why you can change the pixel dimentions in the save for web dialog box and not the physical size or ppi. To make it easy to reduce the pixel dimentions.

HT4623 why cant i save phone image to photo album...its show save this image to your phone app?,,,,,but no image is save

why cant i save phone image to photo album...its show save this image to your phone app?,,,,,but no image is save

Hi FANMixco,
To be clear, you can see the image from your file system but cannot access it from code?
I'd like to know what could be my bug because I don't understand why I can access from the URL,
-> If you can access the image from URL, you should definitely download it and use it, I'm not quite understand your question now.
I'm not knowledgeable with chmod under Linux, let's say if we give it full accessibility, what will be the result?
Anyway if you can see the image from file system, that already means the upload is succeed, I think you may need get some suggestion from php side to see how can we save the image with a correct permission.
I will move the question to off topic, since the question is on the server side but not client side, which is out of the forum support scope, thanks for your understanding.
--James
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

The aspect ratio of this file is not support by DVD. Possible slideshow error?

hello everyone,
I will try to give as much information as possible. Dont scream at me if i forget anything. For starters, I just learned how to use Adobe Encore CS4. I taught my self between reading the help files and videos I found on the web. I am an amateur when it comes to DVD authoring (could have alot to do with my problem). Im an animator and I am making a DVD to show my demo reel, drawings, and i have a storyboard to final comparison video. I designed all of my menus in photoshop. I have one transition that was animated in after effects that was imported using dynamic link. My demo reel is a mov file at 640x360 widescreen, half the size of HD 720p. The comparison video is a premiere file from dynamic link (same size as the demo reel). There is some background music for the menus. Then I have 3 slideshows, and i believe this is where the error is coming from. Most of the artwork has the same dimensions but there are some that are larger or smaller. Some are jpg, but most are PSD files. The slide show is set to manual advance with music in the background. I have no transition effects on the slideshow. When building the DVD, i believe when it says "starting project" after all the importing was done,i get the error
The aspect ratio of this file is not support by DVD. PGC info: name= Figure Drawing (name of the slideshow and a menu button) ref=Fpgc, time=234.2340s
I just tried to build the DVD without the slideshow and I still get the error. Possibly a menu issue? I have no idea. Ive ran into errors before but I was able to get through the others. I just cant seem to find a solution to this error. Even after searching the forums for similar problems. Hopefully, the solution is simple. If more info is needed let me know. I really need this DVD to send out for jobs!! Thanks everyone.
Brandon

When doing SlideShows, whether in Encore (somewhat limited), or in PrPro, it is always better to re-size outside of these programs, prior to Import. I use Photoshop (PS) to do this, and use an Action to get everything in the proper Mode, Color Space, Size - everything. I always do a Save_As and use .PSD files. I also Save a working version, incase I have Flattened, etc., for Import into the NLE/authoring app.
JPEG's *should* work fine too, though there is the JPEG compression to deal with. Might not be an issue, but for max quality, I start with RAW images, process to .PSD's, and then work from copies of these, to get my still Assets ready for PrPro, or En.
I either size exactly to my Project Preset, or to exactly what I need, if say I will pan across a zoomed out image. In a major Project, I may have sub-folders with 4 different sizes of image - based precisely on what I will need to do with that/those image(s). If I will not need to do any animation on any images, then I use that Project Preset (including the correct PAR) and they work perfectly. This also eliminates any unnecessary overhead on the system.
Good luck,
Hunt

What is a "Core Image-capable video card" ?

Roxio Toast 10 Titanium Pro recommends in its System requirements that a core image-capable video card be used. I don’t know what this means, nor do I know whether my iMac has this video card.
I checked the System Profiler for my aging 2005 iMacG5 PPC and under Hardware / Graphics/Displays, my iMac has an ATI Radeon X600 XT. Under the Displays description, there is a “Core Image: Hardware Accelerated” feature. I don’t know how important the recommended video card is, nor whether my existing card would meet Roxio’s recommended system requirements.
I picked the Final Cut Express HD Forum to post this question; if there is a better Forum, please advise.
I want to purchase this Roxio software so that I can burn Blu-Ray discs of 1080i video footage downloaded from my Canon Vixia HV30 into Final Cut Express 3.5. After video editing in FCE, I want to export into Toast 10 because iDVD will not produce hi-def DVD’s.
I’m sure there are some experts out there who know whether my video card is sufficient for what I want to do, and may have other comments/suggestions about my hardware and its ability to work with Toast 10 and meet Blu-Ray objectives.
Thanks in Advance
BoBo

Alchroma,
Thank You for responding to my question; that was a very good reference.
I think I'll be OK with my old iMacG5PPC to handle the requirements of Toast 10 BluRay.
BoBo

Is this image capable of supporting SSH V2? flash:c2800nm-spservicesk9-mz.124-17a.bin

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for